. STATEOFWASHINGTON
I

DEPARTMENT

of CORRECTIONS

WARNING··
THIS FILE IS THE PROPERTY OF THE
WASHINGTON CORRECTIONS CENTER FOR WOMEN
INTELLIGENCE & INVESTIGATIONS OFFICE
CONTENTS MAY SE DISCLOSED ONLY TO PERSONS WHOSE
OFFICIAL DUnES REQUIRE ACCESS. CONTENTS MA Y NOT BE
DISCLOSED TO THEPARTY(S) CONCERNED NOR TO COUNSEL,
WITHOUT SPECIFIC AUTHORIZA TION OF THE SUPERINTENDENT.

CASE TOPIC: STAFF MISCONDUCT EW LARllY

nxJR;

CASE#: OH}-()49-03-f01
DATE OPENED: 10/06/03
DATE CLOS~D: 10/16/03

sign .and date at
time of review or. re~eipt
"

I

,.,-..

,

-;

. IN OFFICE REVIEW

CASE OUT REVIEW

)

223

,,:,.- """":~'

,-

:

/'

.

: -,

':'~

"
,",,"

CONFIDENTIAL

Washington State Correction
Center for Women

)

Intelligence & Illvestigations
Caie File '
10..04.9-tl3~FOl
.

..

..

.

.,. <}",'_: :....'.. :._. "..c.'.

".

'

J. "

22'4

Washington Corrections Center for Women
Intelligence & Investigations
Investigative Case
. #10-049-03~FOl

October 16, 2003
Belinda D. Stewart
Superintendent, WCCW

TO:

Steven B. BaxteIl'1rr~"'>'rw

FROM:

.Investigator,
SUBJECT:

Possible Staff Misconduct:RE: AC Cook Larry Y liang

SYNOPSIS: On 10/06/03 a case of possible staff misconduct was opened at WCCW. This case involved
accusations of sexual contact between Inmate
!EWe W~ AC Cook Larry
Young. Inmat.
.came forward with the. acCuslitions to Food Manager ,~l&S.klJIR¥,,1lfter Mr.
Young wrote. her all18ior infractionfor what he t)1o~ght,was a threat towards him in the serving line (see
attachment 1- infraction and statements). Mr. Lamas then notified 1&1 and escorted her to the MI visiting
room along with Aast Food Manager ~2l!i..~,~a!BI!!-""
.

in:n~::. i!!iCIiiliiJ.~~~:as ill

.'. 'on for c. . .tneir ~=:':e~~y;:~.~er
, .,leho wollld coirlJim the accusationS. ACYoUDg was pl8CeCl on home 8S'!illtJ!''l~ on 10/07/03

•

::~c~~~~f~~: ~~~::~~~:::g::':hetoin~=~~;'s::;;~~~~OkLarry ';/,
Young was returned to work on 10/16/03.
INVESTIGATIVE INTERVIEWS:
-:;'~:::"""if"'-";>,;':,~I,:",_",,,/:-::~,.,: .',

• t]

:.,t' .'A~Was

, , "

"

,', '

_"

.

interviewed on 10/06/03 and stated that she had been in .
a ..
relati6!isJIijnvl' E8n'y Youhg tor about three years but had ended it about a year before. Inma~.
pi'!'
stated that the following had occnrred daring that time:
'
• Kissing by both parties
• Touching by both parties
• cp~~jS/Contraband tq ioclude perfume, chocolate,and body spray.
"
Inmate.
enied ever having·sex with Larry Young during, this initial interview. Inmate
, e !lhatshe had no notes.odetters from hiin nor had sheever made any phone calls to him
u

ill!!
.~=o~~~~::~~n:;~~f~~=~w=~~:t~:"~:s
: :Mr. r=rid, "Did you lcit nim tOuch you, I'll kick his ass." InmateflllllllJs

.~. Of s would

f~ceived a pOlygr~ph on 10/08/03 and was asked two relev~t~ti~ns with the

.

~. ~Jf~il!

wtlil,.,

:(~ ., ~:eJ~~e~on::J.'~r:,,':S_t!.9"··
~;oo~e~i~~fa~:that
P

, ,.. S,.;

slie was

a:lt

, , 'dee dOli

• ."Has q. oUng e~';'llissed you?"~SULe;~he
: ansVIetedyes
{ . ..
"

'

.~' !irid'es,

p

w:' attem:pilili'ae'¢epli~
~~n she
. , .' .

'.I ....:

,.

©@IN1!F1l®[g1Nl1fll~~

>"':', -:)::::',,;:<i~::4~;:,,'-:',; !;":::;',;:",:,,";:,;:'<>:-i~"

::c ::: . '::',':::,',., ,-::

225

Page 2
CAS~ #10-049-03-F01
Staff Misconduct RE: Larry Young
10/16/03

The polygraph was conducted by GSR Polygraph services and rechecked by a second examiner (see
attachment 2 - polygraph results).
Inma

."

F stated during an interview with WCCW h\V~tjgatorKelly Kelly that Mr. Young

..',

f_~~~i§E=
the following: .
.
.
• 1 lov""and "I would fuck with her ontlle.oJltside.",
.
• When asked if he would leave his wife fo
~. Young is supposed to have answered" 1

don'tknow."

,

-

Inmate~eed to a polygraph exam., which was administered on 10/14/03 and was askedtwo

relevant questions with the fo~o~r«SUlis:
• Did y~u SCI' I1mm~ver rub Larry Young's leg? ~ults - she was not attempting
deception when she~~9yes
~ •.•....•....•
• Did Larry Young ever tell you tbat he loved Inma~#- Chart recordings were not
adequate to form an opinion as to the truth ofher respOnse of yes.

'~il!(llT"'. - stated that she had been told by Inmate
folIdVili1g'llifo~liOli:"
.• 'Relilti0nship had been on-going for three years
.
She
had
bali
oral
sex
with
Mr.
Young,
he
had
performed
the
act
on
her
this
occurred
two years ago
•
on ber birthday
• Larry told berthat he would leave his wife for her
• Hadbr~~therp~and~~Y. .
Had fiXed her watch on the outside and then brought it back in

bad

When questioned'on what she had seen for herselfInmate ..
'ltated that she had seen then
leaY!ngthe freezer together and had se~:himhW' .• .
on 6iie'occaafon'oh,tDe hips. l"'!'ateU .. ,
~ver saw Mr. Yo~g giy~, . '"
y of the conirabijtld' sta~d a~o~e hot:hWd any ,
~endearment. lmililte,
tate the she had
'f!Pijpg, ut When
pre~sed for examPles shestl\~'d;' 'jou'" 0 • 06 ;joking arow:l.li;' .
. ...." . . . '0 stated
a
thattheir had been a oontes~betweenhe~;Mr. Youngand'lmn .
oscthe most
weiiht. The bet
that the loser would shave their'eYe~roWB off: ".
" ' .,!-ot
shave his eyebrqws,soiJ;lstead made,' .~O¢illl chicken dinner for the ki '
stated that~t track bft¥ contest On her oomputer. A~!._
and cOmPJlter cIisR!l'prol!uceda 3.5 diskwitli ~ file entitled LanY's an~Wel~h"€'
file was created on Feb 13,2003 and last modified .onOct 8,2003..
. -C"

a

was

rew.

ic 'cis- was interviewed on 10108/03 'and stated that hi had never seen Mr. Young or
,
'. .ore inappropriate while in.ille kitchen. Mr. Nichols stated that on one occasion he
, had fouiid'tlrefu" fu" freezer but where not 610se tGgetlier.
,',

::,::,:,.:..;"."'),::",, .. :.:

"

....

',.:

..... '

: .... , '

"':'.

',.c, ..,··"

....••

22.6

Page 3
CASE #10.049·03.F01
Staff Misconduct RE: Larry Young
10/16/03
Asst. Foo.d Manag~r~~-Ar~J.tk:.'I\'BS intemew~d on I ?108/03 ';"d statedthat while he had never
seen him mappropnate wttll any mmate he had seen him makingfood for the inmates but not just for a few
he would make it for the whole crew (see writtenstatement attachment 4).
'
CCCC.Food ~.!&!ltJJ.£~~fi1!IJ!.n;~,~;:;;. was interviewed by phoneon 10109/03 and stated that during
her time at WCCW sh"hAa neverseen Mr. Youngbe sexually inappropriate withany inmate although he
had been writtenup several times for the wayhe talkedto the inmates - cussing etc.
WCCW!2.o~,~,,;,,~ant~,!:tU!- was interviewed on 10108/03 and statedthat he had never seen
Mr. Youngmappropna e Wl~any mmate.
tes ",pl!,~,!!!;hed Inv. Baxter in the Mi Kitchen:

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

Theseinmates wan~ to saythat they had ~ workedin the kitchen for varying times from years to months
andhad never seenMr. Young treat ~y different than anyotherinmate. They stated that'
they bM never seen him flirt with her but JUSt "kicked" it withher like he doeswith all inmates. They did
statethat he yells at thembut tjlat's just Larry.

~fyJ~;;~:1~~:;~:i~:?=~9
gave to her.

.'

. v>;...::........

...,

... :.

.

..

,"

',,','

AC CooKLllrJ:YYoung wasinterviewed on 1017/03 and state!!~t J!e ,never had a relationship with

=o1i,@~~

,j

·:·~·d::fg.~~::~~~g1n~~!e

./S~~~::d%~:~~~~~:h~.

If '
qst shCWdlillillliave her eye, 0 :'lf~~l~. c,. • oUld cookthem a special dinner, .Mr. •
yOlil!-g::~!lia~)ie'llid 'lose ilnd'did cook j:he dinnerbut thatit )yQs for the whgl\; : . hen,s,taff not jm:tIIM

,1 )k..!ili/lt. young also deniedevet bringingany contrabllDd to

,"
.;': \:,·t::,':·',,;,:-~;::)·,·:,:'<.·_'::, ,"" .., ' . . . ".." . :,"',',.. -: ," :, _":,',,,.:,:" ,',,',,:.:-{fff!i'il' 1f·.
Concluding Synopsis: Froniinformation and witnesses suj>plied by lim,,! ",~
e case of a '
physlcavseXUal. relationship with 'Mr.
Young isinconc!iislv". bin:i~tii
polygtaph exam
showed she Was being decePtive biher
to questioilS6£phy.icai ,,6ft
'p 'er.witnesses were
not deeis,lve In lho:ir views ob. tl\e relatloxishlp. Erom,certaln witnesses ii,lnfg1lf6~;derl 'ed that certain
tounbing might ha",ie occurred'b,\~ Viith-tli~ amount of lc"mat.e wOrkers,in " , !Kitchen to hRve etlly two
comeJorwai'd witlrUrl'onnatlo~decre8se8,the viabilityof:lhelrc.lm, It
, \\in how"ver that Mr.
Young' ardi~iilfclpate illa weiglif loss contest arid when he ~ost' fuade aspehi , ,lor fOr tbeininMes in the
ki~.·'WlmerOUs;iljm.tes,aS'il1entiotiediri'j:bis'itlveiilig~ti9Jl also state;tjial'~. Y;~tlhg Muld be verbally
~~~~~:Jliteilicii6liSwitlHliefuln the; kitbhen. ''t!l'is case'lS 6!6s~ jlefuliiigany furthei~eldpni~ts

LatrY

answer.

CY,I.
,--""

:'

i:"":li';;::-1.-','

227

NOTE: An ECR investigation has been initiated due to four grievances from inmates and to look into the
allegationsof the weight contestand his cooking dinner for the inmates

\

2003.3796

DO~#~

Offender Name
,.

Hearing DatelTi,me
1018103

I

Infraction Date

TBA

OBTS Codes

1012103

----+---tl-I--

DataBase
OBTS

{ () - £ . cJS
•-

.

[

-'.tA~

1J1V"

Narrative
INF Hold

PjL~:'.JA':....

_

i6 -{- C13

Attachment (l )
229

2003.3796

•

STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

SERIOUS INFRACTION REPORT
~

on Correction Center for Women

Neme:

Number()fiUl~(~)Vi(,lat~d: _5",'b"'6'---

~

Date:
TIme:

--

Place:
Details in ~II:

10/2103
17:49
Dining hallMI

'

IDOC,'~tated in the dinnerline "Did you remove my soy sauce from
• ed 'That's alright, I've got something for you." I perceived this as a threatening

At approximately 1749 hours, inmate.
my salad?" I replied, "Yes, I did." Inmate'
stlltemenl:
Witnesses:
Young, LarryD.
REPORTING STAFF

Young, LarryD.

--::RE::P::O::'RTI~3NG==~ST=A::FtF :::SI=GN:7A::
::::RE
:: : - - - - - - - - - - - - - ru

LEASE PRIN

.

, ) .

Was,inmate informed of rightto remain silent? X Yes D No
PLEA: NOTGUILTY:

Dateof Hearing:

-"10"'16"'1"'0"'3

-,-_

GUILTY:

506

Did theinmate make statementafter being informed of hislher rights? X Yes D No
If so, whet? The stetement is, only In pert not ~II. lasKad him if he removed my soy sauce from my salad. He said "yes." I told him I
WQulddeal with Mr. Lames aboutthis. I did notthraaten him h ~sii:icai1il~i:i';'~~:::;~~:=':7.":-.'~,:',..-:-.';;;-,..-

il$lj"l!I!~;l;~!jl:~mi!~~::;··~fr_~'i:f.::.':

Finding: NOT GUILTY: c-'i'50"'6'---~
I

------~

...,

.

GUILTY:

Facts and evidence found:

506 - NOTGUILTY
finding based on written report and inmate statement.
/
'

,

Sanction(s):
Not applicable.
Reason forsanction(s):
Notapplicabie.

D WILL APPEAL

D NO APPEAL

HEARINGS OFFICER

SUPERINTENDENT

,

,

J,

Dlstribuilon:
,.. ",. ,:",':,.-:.:.'
, DOC 20-051

GREEN. Offender

>.: -. :,-, '"

CANARYT Untt Sgt

'PINK ~ CUS / Counselor

. I

,

,

y , .

GO~DENROD"" Hearings Officer
:: '.',
';,:j\:-:,":",:L:,',':,}
,DOC451.000

230

2lIlI3.37llI

STATEOF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

, ..j-"

om'_lf'll
.: ~ _~ "":~'''';;':;'''''':"_.:~ :'t·:.'.':'·'.,.,·... .: ..... :.:-' •.': ;:".;' :
TIME OF
DATE~G

... ~--'ff~

::"

DISCIPLINARY HEARING
MINUTES AND FiNJ:lINGS
,

...

HEAlflWi

DOC NUMB~,
INFRACTION DATE

/

10l2I03

1/1;1'2

W/WED 24 HOURS NOTICE
WAIVED APPEARANCE

'7
OFFENDER'S PLEA: GUILTY

INTERPREJ:ER: "

DYES

STAFF ADVISOR:

DYES

COMPETENCY CONCERN:

DYES

~
~

NOT GUILTY

;=

YES
YES

IV

~ l?
NO

$fJ{ ,

NAME:
NAME:
HEARING IMPAIRED:

/'"

DYES

[iNO

SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY (LIST WITNESSES TESTlFYING)/EVIDENCE USEDIFIND1NGSI REASONS FOR CONTINUANCES, DECISIONS, AND SANCTIONS/ANY

RELEVANTINFORMATION~ 7316

INFRACTION NO.

>7.17'.-;17;",-

If

~'7

,,t:?.htT

~' Pv/~

GUILTY

SAHcnON(Sl:

TIME

'

Distribution: WHrre'C.~ttal Fli. CANARY·Heering OfficerPINK.Offend.r
DOC 21·312 (Rov,'1l7105I2002) POL
-,
, '"- . ,, :~:::>\;:-;" . ',~"

231

.•
,,

if

"
STATE OFWASHINGTON
'
~', 'DEP~ENT OF CORRECTIONS

.'.

INITIAL SERIOUS INFRAcTlor,fREPORT

CL~"L--~~

ttt.sJ/.!3

•

DATE OF INFRACTION

"

, 'RULE VIOI.Ano~ #(S)
.

'-.

',': '.';

'0
(

TIME OCCURRED

o A:M;:;l'P.M.

\:

PI.ACE OF INCIDENT (BE SPECIFIC)

~r-N..

OATE OCCURRED

""-...\\. ~,

\.<:::T

1::.'1-- 't;) 1>.

WITNESS (1)

DAYS OFF

WITNESS (3)

DAYS OFF

WITNESS (2)

DAYS OFF

WITNESS (4)

DAYS OFF

.. ;r .

~

,',.

,.'

,':;

-,'

.

/

,,

- - s---~.
PHOTO SUBMITIED
DYESDNO
PI.ACED IN PRE·HEARING CONFINEMENT

EVIDENCE LOCKER NUMBER
YES NO
D1S,~OSITldNOF EVID,ENCE (IF NOTPI.ACED IN LOCKER)

:. ;'. '~:~
c'

(

....;.':' 'f..-

ESDNO

',AELATEDREPORTS ATTACfjED

, DATI:

.,'L Q -;.;z -oh'

~-,--

--,-

---.-:-

--==--

-;-__,_H'2 32

STATE OF WASHINGTO••
DEPARTMENT of CO~cnONS

INFRACTION REVIEW CHECKLIST

1::1.

Examine the infractlon to ensure that each field is filled in property and written legibly.

B-

Ensure the offender's name and DOC number areI"!lcorded correctly.

l2r

Read the infraction report narrative and ensure thefollowing elements are Included:

o Who?
o What?
o Where?

o Why?

DHoW'?
'.

Q--

Check to be surethatthe infraction violations at the top of the reportcorrespond with the written Information and
are' appropriate tor the Incident
NOTE: The reviewer may; 1) require that the report be revised. rewritten. or reinvestigated by the reporting staff
member to ens,ure the alleged fltctssupport the charges, or 2) add, dismiss. delete or reduce the indicated WAC
violations as !Ippropriate, based upon the Information and/orevidence provided by the reporting staff and any

'

mW~ng~~.

Ensure the report is factual, without alilsumptions, feelings, beliefs or what the reporting staff"thinks' mayhave
happened.
EhsurethereportinclUdes supporting documentation if the incident Included:

o Injunes? Medical Respo~e?
OWitnelilSes?

o property Damage?
o Use of Force3
o TeleincldenlRep9rt'?
DOtherSuPlJlementaJ Information?
.

o

.:

'

.\

!;:n~w:e ~Leviclence has been collected. secured. and logged property lnaccordence with polley and facility
pl'9c8dUres.Did yOu document:
•

o Evl(jence tak~n?

DEvi~l!ncl! sa~eNumber assigned?

Dwt\etHer~rn9Uheevldence .wasplsped in an evidence locker?
The clisp<>sttion of th~ eVidence if· not placed in locker?
D'Ph919ssubmiltlld?
'

lEI

'...

-

"

,

Complete the "Placed in Pre-hearing Confinement"
field
by checking
theI"Yes"or "No"boxes.
::<:." ,....
",,:::':
.: . .: ""
"
.:

'

..

'

,'.

'0

. "",". ,,:

;..'

'

.~

",

J

If confidentialinform!l~onhes,bllllhsubmitted.ha\i.e you:

o Reviewed the Information to ensure it is consistent with other reports?

Checked to lll1s4reth~~dcici4!"~nts are m~iked or slalTJ:ped as ~90nfldenti~I"?
.
oo andfor'Narq
Requested that tlie slathtil10 receIved the Information Initiate DOC 05- 392; Confldentiallnformalion Report
,illo CleSighatedfllcllity:stafr?

.,' ..

'

'.'~":

OOC 21,961 (112003) ceo

"

,':

,,:,

,

..

J

.)

•

,

'

'

.'

PIll·1ol2

I

I:d'

TI
TI
U

Tne InilJaJ Serious Infra!;:tlon report (with attachments, If any) Is complete. Sign and date the Initial Serious .
Infraction Report on the line labeled "Infraction Review Officer Signature" (Signature must be legible).
Send the infraCtion report and any supporting Documents to the hearing clerk or designated facility staff.
.

}

.

'

..

Tile Initial Serious InfraCtion report has been reviewed and is being returned for the following reason( s):
Reaso~
.
Prompjly resubmittile infraction report willltlle corrected I appropriate information, inclUding this Infraction Review
ClleckJi~t.

\,

\

'

J

.1
OOC21-961 (112003) ceo

234

...

. ---- ..
STATE OFWASHINGTON
DePARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

2lIll3.3788. HEARING NOTICE! APPEARANCE WAIVER

OFFENDER NAME '-.

_

DOC~UMBE~

FACILITY

DATE.

WCON

o DISCIPUNARY
EARNED TIME

"

LED FOR:

H

o CLASSIFICATU$13

LOCATION

/

.

TIME

DA.M.
DP.M.

HMrina 0Ifice

REASON FOR IiEARING (INCLUDE ALL ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT IF APPROPRIATE)

CIwiJed with violation or 508

I HAVE m=N PROVIDEDA CERTIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER

INTERPRETER NAME I DATE

I HAVE SEEN PROVIDED WITH A SPANlSI;I TRANSI.ATION OF TIlE CIfARt:iI;S AGAINSTME ON
SEME HA OAOO UNA TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL DE LOS CARGOS EN ME CONTRA EL alA

DATE/FECHA

TIMEI HORA

OFFENDER SIGNATURE I FIRMA DE OFENSOR

OFFENDER RIGHTS:

~ YOUHAVETHE RIGHT TO REIo'AIN SILENT ATTllE

HEARI\'iG.IF YOU CHOOSE TO REMAIN SILENT;VOUR SILENCE MAYBE USED
AGAINST YOU AND THE DECISION WILL BE BASED.ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED.

Ef' YOlfMAY WAIVEYOURAPPEARANCE ATTHEHEARING.
0"" yOU MAYREQUEST
WITNESS STATEMENTS:
.
..
".;-"

STAFFNAMe

PosmON

I2r CRIMINAL CHARGES MAYBE PENDING.
STATUS OF CRIMINAL CHARGES:

(Liat WItn_ Below)

r£

NONE

OFFENDER NAME

ANYTHING YOU SAY HENCEFORTH MAY BE USED AGAINST YOU IN A COURT OFLAW
Q1:lNKNOWN

0

PENDING IN

6YOU':tAVE'TJlE RIGHT TO REVIEW ALLRElATED REPORTS ANDA SUMMARY OF

"

DOC NUMBER

~~:FIDENTIAL INFORMAn:"GES

ErYou MAYREQUEST A STAFFADVISOR (H approved by the HearingOfficer).
0
c;r"Ybu MAYREQUEST ~ INTERPRETER (If unable to. speak andlor unde",t;lndthe English language). 0
Id1tf~A:6~EQUEST AC~fl.TIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER IF YOUARE HEARING
. 0

~IVED

F,lEQUESTED

~AIVED

REQUESTED

~V~D

REQUESTED

- Q'YOUMA'C'APPEAL THE DI;<;:ISI9N ANDtOR SANCTIONS TO THE FACILITY SUPERINTENDENT/SUPEFlVISOR.

.

CY~oW~~~flE ~4N,~~~I~tM, ,~~Q~ ~i~~D ";'lTnIN, ~O.DAYS OFAN ESTABLISHeD RE~E DATE, A GUILTYFINDING

0' .

.

·R.
. INI
G 'tid

.

. !ve MYRIGHT TO THE REQUIREQ 48 HOURS NOTICE PRIOR
ON)HEARING OFFICE ANDAUTHORIZE THE HEARING
,AND
EVIDENcePRESENTeD
TOTHE HEARING OFFICER
AS
"/
.
,
. . '

,.

";;WArvEMY RIGHT TO THE ReCl\JIRED24 HOURS NOTICE PRIOR

"~~~':N~g~rc:~N~ ~~~*~I~~~~~ep~~i~~&~~ON
=.,.,...""",,,,,,,,......WAlVE MY RIGHT T; ATIEND THIS SCHEDULED ~EARING.
.
I

I

235

'.

::

._.. _-----_.

••••1;

Im.",ralernoeded fpI'_...,Neeeallo Inl8",,,10 para
,-,'",

"

(languaga).
(Idloma).

.•:-

.,I
!

DAYS OFFl DIAS UBRES

~SPONSE
RESPUESTA

(

RESPONDER IPERSONAQUE RESPONDE

,

."'.

I.

,

236

"

..

~

"~'

.

.

~~t() -{f/1

• =~=cno~s.·.. . .

,.,N"'ATE'S KIT,E

PAPELETA DE. Pi:T1c:ION DI;L RECLUSO

Interp.....r n..dad for
Nece.1to lnt8rprstB psrs

REASON /QUESTION
RAZO~

.,"

.', ..'

'j

I PREGUNTA

~.

(Ianguaga).
(Idi0nla)'

;±]A]wiAc( YY\Aj Qn~
'vsou1 Y\Dt!{i;;;; SLo ptw.&z
LO\'"\C\JfJ:;lf VK&j hlOJ\ (1-'' '-&

RE$PONSE
RESPUESTA

\
....,

I OA

RESPO~OER I PERSONA QUE RESPONO~
"

.' • . .

,' .. "

'............

TEl FECHA

.........•...... > /

.....,....

. ':

..'

. .'. : . .

~ : ·.WHrrEIYELLQw~,YEu.~,lOotrilndwwlth Response..P1NK-O lfilnder keeps

~:·EIlAHcA1AIIARliJ.:A"PiInIOrie quit...,..., AM4,RIL.LA~1lilntCIutO con l'e8f3ueeta; ROs.we lei
~"~"""""'"

,,!"

'.,;.'

'.

,

DOC21'"473E1S.(11I1l1)OCO

(

.237

GSa
POLYGRAPH SEBVIOlS
WIlliam D.Tu118
1409 18'" Ave

cr.sw

Puv~llup, WA 98371

POLYGRAPH EXAMlNA.TION REPORT

TO:

Investigator Steve Baxter
Department of Corredions
washtngton Corredions 9enterfor Women
PO Box 17
Gig Harbor, WA 98335

._,h

Subject:

Examination Date:

10/08103

Offense:

Statement Verification

C

,;

DOB:

-,'If

1967

";'

Investigator Steve Baxter

Reqllested by:

Purpose of Exarni!lation: To verify
her and performed oral sex on her.

or refute the subjeph allegations that Larry Young kissed

Priorto the polygraPh. examination, the_subject was advised of her Polygraph Rigt1ts and waived
these rights by signing the
attached fOrm.
.
. .
1,

CONCLUSIONS
A polygraph examination was administered to the subject on the above issues.

t
Based on the physiolpgical responses prqducecl by the subject on three (3) polygraph charts, in
the 0p'inionofthis examiner, she was'attempting deception when she answered ·yes" to the )
followmg relevant questions:
'

1. Has Larry Young ever performed oral sex on you?
2. Has Larry Young ever kissed
. you?
,

.

I

..

'

..

.'

. '

.

.. .

"

'

,

'

,

A second examiner. !=.ric Killian, has reviewed this examination and concurs with the'numerical
evaluation and'conclusions.,
'
"
'
','
J
.
'.

Odabedt 2003 '
Dale!$lR~rl'

GSR

POLYGRAPH SERVICES
William D.TUIIs

1+09'18th AveCT. SW
Puyallup, WA 98371

POLYGRAPH EXAMlNA'DON REP8RT

TO:

Investigator Kelly Kelly
Departn\ent of Corrections
washington Correction Centerfor Women
PO Box 17
Gig Herbor, WA 98335

Subject:

976

008:
Requested by:

Examination Date:

10/14/03

Offense:

Statement Verification

Investigator Kelly Kelly

Purpose of Examination: To verify or refute the s\.lPj~:~>!III!l!SlilIion that Larry Youngtold you
that he loved Inmate Altheimer and if you saw Inmat~1:l Larry Young's leg.

Priorto.the pplygraph examination,the subjectwas advised Of her Polygraph Rights ,and waived
these rights by sjgning the attached form.
v

."

CONCLUSIONS
A polygrap~ examination was administered to the subjecton the above issue.
)

Based on the physioloQical responses produced bythe sUbj~ on four (4) polygraph charts, in
the opinion Of this examiner, she was not attempting deel:lption when she answered "yes" to the
following relevant question:
'
1. Did you see

,

Inmat~r rub Larry Young's leg?
," ""T"'''' ,

Base9 on the erratic physiological responses produCEld by the subjl!lcl on four (4) polygraph
charts, In the opinion Of tl')is ~min",r,chartrecoi'dings w~~not ~~fJate to form a definite
oplnibn as to truth or deceptionwhen she answered "yes" to thefol1QWing relevantquestion:

I~ved

1. ! ,Did La'rry Young evertell you that he
Inmat" '
, ", . ,.,_,>:,\'><:,"-,." . _,' - ' .: ", ,"..- _.,.' ;., -. ','_ .. ',',_<,: ... ,Iy,:,:::"t---'):':i}}-t>,,:
A second eXaminer; Eric Kiljian, has reviewed this. examination and conclJrs with the numerical
evahJation and&ndusions. .

,,!

.., ,"

~!S;~~?::>

"'

October 1.5, 2003

i'" ':;"".< .;.. .',~~.,.' . ,;;.::(:;.:':-.:,,:.•.'",;:'/':.. :::~,.,,~, ;,;.. ".,',."'.:">,:, "'. ',,'.'. '

Dare" olRe~ri

'=xarillher:W\llIam.,C); TUfts

Attachment, ( 3)
.' '':''-,....

239

e. 'ye;t I
0 c c...0\ '5'> (cn I
ka v e, .5;0 c.K€J,
'1-0
Lc$..V'YY YOe.-LYl
Cl.b~<--L.~ I=IX""o- -j-)',e frlf-C-h e ...
W&v-Itev Food ;J:.";-eYV2S -I-i-a..-I- t\\-e.. ,vzo-r- O h j-:he..
n-: en i.A. 5 L.A.- C. c-; C< 5 p}~ {e. d C h , c ,ke_h ; "1 s-re« d a';:;
/Ja ICed.;L Ac<-ve- /7':; of- S ee,t;t h¢fl1 f',,x,n.a- t.f-e'-5
Po Y d:u.:.-+ e n e I l - ' ] ~ -f-e.- b u: f- /0 yo -I-A.-E..... w4:, f€..S e u

() i"'\

cr

$h,F"-I-, ~ c.lov-c,f-

bel "1

cr

f

Gr eecs e...

knc~ 01 cv-.y l'7or vu'''''OS
ye- f> c;cr-eJ, r /. , e -H /4A e- h. e, l-<. S e.. -1-1- e,

f:-o

r

5""-,,,-41' Pc-,.-WI

rc-/,.... ·

IMiIt

Wa

s

f-I.--e... deep
Dlnne.r

5 Ufl~C).5'€:-

1:-

ro

r r» o€.r

a5
s c.

lA-'

+-,hE.- lo/l

Jo e... b.qlce.d

t:J

0#1.

Ot

KI +-Ch-e-h

C 4tc..ken

-l: t.. e- . rYI en "',' i m.

-,

Attachment (

S., '

240

241