WA DOC Report Staff Sexual Misconduct (Gregg), WA DOC, 2003
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS WARNING THIS FILE IS THE PROPERTY OF THE WASHINGTON CORRECTIONS CENTER FOR WOMEN INTELLIGENCE & INVESTIGATIONS OFFICE CONTENTS MA Y BE DISCLOSED ONL Y TO PERSONS WHOSE OFFICIAL DUTlESBEQUlRE ACCESS. CONTENTS MA Y NOT BE DISCLOSED TO THE PARTY(S) CONCERNED NOR TO COUNSEL, WITHOUT SPECIFIC A UTHORIZA TION OF THE SUPERINTENDENT. c;, CASE TOPIC: Staff Misconduct - ACWf'~r~gg;,andlhmate_ _'-''',:::c.:?'._,.---~'tr'':::'1:::''-'':'-:~7<'~: " S:;ASE #: 03-015-03-F01 DATE OPENED: 3/7103 . DATE CLOSED: 3/12/03 sign and date at time of review or receipt IN OFFICE REVIEW 75 CONFIDENTIAL Washington State Correction Center for Women Intelligence & Investigations Case File 03-015-03-FO 1 CONFIDENTIAL J 76 ATTACHMENTS 1.1R Dated 3/6/03 by Sgt. Amu 2.IR Dated 3/6/03 by CO Cowans 3.1R Dated 3/6/03 by AC Gregg 4. Statement by 11M _ Undated 77 Washington Corrections Center for Women Intelligence & Investigations Investigative Case 03-15-03-FOI March 12, 2003 TO: Belinda Stewart Superintendent, WCCW FROM: Steven B. Baxter Investigator, WCCW SUBJECT: Possible Staff Misconduct: AC ~Wiam Gregg SYNOPSIS: On 3/6103 Inmat~f)OC~reported to staff that AC William (Ray) Gregg had made inappropriate remarks to her (see attachments 1-3 Incident reports). ~l~ges that she approached A,C Gregg and asked for a wire whisk and he in return asked her for a blow job. lnmat~tates that this isn't the first time this has happened and that it has been occurring since Christmas. INVESTIGATIVE INTERVIEWS: ~i_)wasinterviewed on 3/7/03 and related the same Inmate information as stated above and as included in the custody incident reports. These statements included the following allegations: ~ That AC Gregg had asked her for a blow job when she asked him for a wire whisk • AC Gregg had been sitting on a crate with a banana between his legs and said "look at my little wee wee." • That AC Gregg frcsl.lleIltly told dirty jokes to the inmates • That he told VM""guess what on Monday I'm getting a blow job, and on Tuesday pussy and dft wed more pussy and guess what it's not from my old lady." e. a ..•rroa.c..hed her in the stockroom and asked when hewas getting his blow job, • Th~.h. I/~aid you're crazy, AC Gregg replied you're crazy and I like my women crazy." ~ates she slapped him and left theroom. Inmat~tated that these iricidents had occurred over the span of several months and that A,CGtegg1lll<i.been on vacation for awhile and so the problems went away until his return. IIM"'eported this incident due to the look in his face when he asked this time she felt thiiihe was no !<mgC)." trying to be funny but rather was serious in his request for a blow-job. InmateflllllJlgave several other names of inmates that either she had told of the incidents or thought might have information on AC Gregg's behavior. These inmates are: 78 Page 2 Case #03-015-03-F01 RE: ACGregg March 12, 2003 • • . - released inmate currently housed at Snohomish County Jail ",: ' .:~0c#._ . .~.. • '. GGil ;U:t '~C!i~'.". ,'0CJ"S. .". • • '. ,j~ ' VM_' II!m3t~~~,~~~)Vas interviewed on 3/10/03 and stated that she was"lifr~ecause of his actions towards her and others, stated that several times in the past year when she had asked for things from AC Gregg he had mentioned giving him a blow job in return for him giving her the item. On one occasion when she asked him for something AC Gregg is alleged to say, "by the time you get.out of here you'll owe me lots ofblow jobs". VM_Jalso stated that AC Gregg had brushed up against her and others in the kit~ another occasion while telling anotherinmate that she thought her rear was getting too big AC Gregg told her "your butt looks f i n e _ you don't have to worry." Another time states she was with VM_~\vhen AC Gregg sat on a crate with a banana,heid"ii'""' between his legs and said look at my wee-wee. VM_,hasagreed to take a polygraph if asked. VM--, Inmate \DQ~_wasinterviewed on 3/11/03 and stated that while working'tin the kitchen about a year ago that AC Gregg had asked her to let him watch VM landher girlfriend have sex. VM\_lIlso states that she has heard him asked inmates for blow jobs and has commented OR how he is going to get some pussy but not from his wife. Inmate"'stated that other inmates have told her that he has grabbed their butts while in the kitchen. VM . . .supplied a.written statement (see attachment 4) and has agreed to take a polygrapli'ifrequested. Ex-Inmatelil~Jwas interviewed at the Snohomish County Jail on 3/11/03 and statedtliat shefiiS~'Gregg that he was always nice to her, but that he talks like a dirty old man.. ~.stated that she never heard him ask for a blow job , from any inmate. VM......tahidthat they were good friends, and that he let her " volunteer to work at the!citchtln when she came back for violations.' IIMl.stated that AC Gregg had told her about the past investigation conducted on him about his conduct with other inmates in tile kitchen. When asked for details of the investigation lIM_~i \\las able to give the major facts of the case which should not be available to inmates. liM ~so states that AC William had told her he had a friend who managed a Denny's in Bremerton and could get her a job when she got out. 79 Page3 Case #03-015-03-FOI RE: ACGregg March 12, 2003 IIM_,also. stated that they talked about.hich he also attends and that he offered to take her to a meeting upon his release, when she asked him for his phone number AC Gregg told her "I'm the only William Gregg in the book."(A check of the Bremerton area phone book confirmed that he is the only William Gregg in the book.) I / M _ said that one young inmate that came back on a violation stated that AC Gregg had taken her to a_meeting after she got out but liM_didn't know her name. I/M~id state that this inmate was short, Caucasian, with shoulder length brown hair. I~ also related that AC Gregg likes to tell racy jokes to the inmates. . IIM_ Inmate _ D O C ~Was interviewed on 3/10103 and stated that she didn't have any first hand knowledge of anything that AC Gregg had done but that and _ h a d told her the allegations while they worked in the kitchen together. Both had asked her to insure that they didn't have to go alone with AC Gregg anywhere. Inmate~OC~Was interviewed on 3/11103 and stated that AC Gregg IIM_ had come up to her while she was in the kitchen and had told her thathe was under investigation and would be sent home soon. AC Gregg also told her that he thought it was about allegations made by Inmate-,stated that there were other inmates at the table but said they did not want to get involved and would not give the names. AC William Gregg: was interviewed on 3/13/03, and stated that he had not done any of the things alleged by inmates. AC Gregg denied the following: • • • • • • • That he ever asked an inmate for a blow job - even as a joke That he has never touched an inmate He has never asked to see two inmates have sex Ever taking an inmate to an_meeting Ever holding a banana and saying look at my wee-wee, he states that he held it up like a phone That he ever told an inmate about this or any other investigation on him Has never told racy jokes While asking AC Gregg about the banana incident the part about placing the banana between his legs was left out intentionally. During his denial, AC Gregg stated" I never placed a banana between my legs and said look at my wee-wee - 1 held it up and used it like a phone." When asked why he said it was between his legs when I didn't say that, AC Gregg stated "1 just assumed that's where it was at." When asked ifhe had ever taken an inmate to.he said no, when then asked if he had ever seen any inmates at_he tried to tell me it was confidential. When pressed he admitted to seeing several a. 80 Page 4 Case #03-015-03-FOI RE: AC Gregg March 12, 2003 But would not reveal their names. When asked if one looked like the ex-inmate described by Inmate _i,AC Gregg said yes but still refused to give any names. AC Gregg was reinterviewed on 3/17/03 and did admit that he tells inmates that he has a buddy who is the manager at the Denny's in Bremerton and to go see him if they need jobs after they get out. EVIDENCE: None CONCLUSION: AC Gregg refutes all allegations, however while being interviewed he added vital information to the question about the banana At no time during the questioning was the banana mentioned to be between his legs butduring his denial he stated "I did not place the banana between my legs ..." AC Gregg became agitated upon this realization. AC Gregg stated that he had never told any inmates about any cases on him yet two inmates had information that they claim he told them about past and the current case. ACGregg has admitted to telling inmates about getting jobs at the Denny's in Bremerton. Two of the key inmates in this investigation land' Jhave agreed to take polygraphs. 1 Attachment: 1. IR dated 3/6/03 by Sgt. Ahmu 2. IR dated 3/6/03 by CO Cowans 3. IR dated 3/6/03 by AC Gregg 4. Statement by lIM ~dated 81 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS INCIDENT REPORT Use Tab to move to the next Text Field 'E OF INCIDENT INCIDENT CATEGORY ·06-03 Aile ations of staff misconduct. .'<FF WITNESSES (Name, Rank/Job Class, andPostiwork Unit. Volunteers and visitors; name and reason for visit) Me Nish Officer Cowens Officer Bailey :TAILS: (Who was involved, what took place, descriptions of any injuries, damage, USe of force etc. Use additional page if :ess':2'1,9ffi.S!?Lc;.owe.!J- requested to speak to me regum:ding a conversation he had with inmate_ ~Inmat~ade allegations inapproprate comments made by AC Cook Ray Gregg. _ 1900 hour Officer Bailey requested to speak to me reguarding a conversation he had with inmat~and egations. I noitfied Lt. McNish and had inmat~escortedto the shift office. mat~rstated that she works in the MI kitchen and lately has been feeling uncomfortable about AC cook ry Ray. Today she asked for a wire wisk and he adked for a blow job. He will just stand there and wait for sponse. I don't know ifhe has said or done this to other people. Today isn't the first daythis has happened. hen I asked_when this started. She stated around Christmas. I will ask him for something and his sponse will be I need a blow job. I loud talked him hoping someone would hear what he was saying. I said did lU hear what he said to me? xlay I said yuck! Ray replied Yuck! He said it again "so am I going to get a blow job?" while ago he was sitting down on a crate he had a banana inbetween his legs and said to me look at my little ee wee. I said to~anotherinmatekichen worker) look what he is doing when she looked behind the tray 'ea he Ray didn't do it._:got moved to the hill.~ad problems with Ray Ray~d I made and lfeement that we wouldn't go int othe stock ropffi()r alone cause he gives her the creeps~wentto the hill -rout a month and half ago. She use to live in_Jpod. oday I told inmat~an~bothsaid Ray has never said anything like that to them. ~e tells me this at least four times a week. I use to work in the kitchen with . A lot of people made omments that.Ray Ray would always make comments of wanting head. People would say Ray Ray was a dirty ld man. ' ... ' and I got into it. Ra~ulled me off my job and put~in my job and I got made lade some comments about Ray Ray a n d _ A professional would have address that. This happened at the nd of the summer. vbout a month ago Ray told me guess what? Guess what is happening on Monday I'm getting a blow job. On 'uesday guess what I'm getting pussy and on Wed. more pussy. and guess what its not from myoid lady. He dis me if my friend was in town I would be getting some more pussy. I said good for you. started wording in the kitchen' off and on last March. I went to the hole for 30 days. ~bout 2 month ago in the stock room. I didn't want to get into trouble. Ray Ray leaned into me invaiding my :pace he said so when am I going to get my blow job. I step back and told him your crazy. He said your crazy md I like my women crazy. I back handedhim and told him he was sick and I walked out. This all happened md he went on vacation. I went a long time before seeing or having to (leal with. him. Ionight was the first time that it was close for staff overhearing his remarks. OfficllI' Pine overheard that's lfOSS and asked.whats gross? .' ' . ""","'" . c. asked inmat~what did she want for the. out come from this. Inmat_tated she just want the nstitution involved she has had problems with that before. She has never addressed this with Ray Ray his comments telling him to stop. . , Attachment (, ) 82 MMEDlATE ACTION TAKEN:Spoke with staff. Notified shift Lt. requested documentation from staff. nterviewed inmate_ Notified Shift Lt. McNish. Documentation completed. IN SEGREGATION YES NO~ YEsDNoD YES YES YES REPORTING STAFF NAME AND SIGNATURE Kathleen S. Ahmu SUPERVISOR NO NoD NoD DATEITIME 83 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS INCIDENT REPORT OFFENDERS INVOLVED DOC NUMBER LIVING UNIT WITNESSES DETAILS: Who was involved, what took place, how did it happen, description of any injuries, damage, use of force, etc. Attach additional sheet, if necessary. I A 0 LD E. , oFSvG,fl< ArJo HE s.t'iNv.A. A Sl"VC/: (UdJAfJ\ BEiWHIIJ HIS IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN: / Me. IVIS+\ TITLE !?--c ORIGINAL REPORT TO ASSOCIATE SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE DATE/ TIMERECEIVED INVESTIGATION ASSIGNEDTO INCIDENT NUMBER I BY DATE . .. Distribution by Associate Superintendent: Superintendent 0 Intelligence Officer Shift Commander 0 Clinical Director SafetyOfficer 0 Other o o o ...:. o Other oo Other,-. Other _ _ ~ DOC 21-458 (9/91) WCCW Attachment ( ;L ) 84 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS INCIDENT REPORT PLACE I AREA OCCURRED OFFENDERS INVOLVED DOC NUMBER LIVING UNIT DATE I TIME OF INCIDENT - 6- 3 0 USE OF FORCE INCIDENT D YES ~ NO WITNESSES DETAILS: Who was Involved, what took place, how did Ithappen, description of any Injuries, damage, use of force, etc. Attach additional sheet, If necessary. 'IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN: DATE /TIME RECEIVED INVESTIGATION ASSIGNED TO BY Dlstrlbutlon by Assoclet~ Sup'erintendent: Superintendent 0 Intelligence Officer Shift Commander . 0 Clinical Director Safety Officer 0 bther --'- o o o DOC 21-458 (1OJ16/2001)WCCW DATE 0 0 Other Other --'-___ DOther .Attachment (3 ) 85 STATE OFWASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PLACE I INCIDENT REPORT ARr \1c.Hc~ M{:., . OCCURRE~V OFFENDERS INVOLVED DOC NUMBER LIVING UNIT fI~E0(,~i Oz, DATE ,INCIDENT 03 USE OF FORCE INCIDENT DYES utNo WITNESSES DETAILS: Who was involved, what took place, how did it happen, description of any injuries, damage, use of force, etc. Attach additionel sheet, if necessary. -r.;/'-I STJ't TE:D C.'MIW(. ,l olli IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN: REPORTING STAFF SIGNATURE TITLE f/ri "t", ,C.. "A~ DATEI TIME RECEIVED INVESTIGATION ASSIGNEOTO BY Distribution by Associate, Superintendent: 0 Intelligence Officer 0 Clinical Director 0 Other o Superintendent o Shift Commander o Safety OffIcer DATE --'---,-____ 0 0 0 Other other Other DOC 21-458 (10/16/2001)WCCW 86 Washington Corrections Center for Women Intelligence & Investigations Investigative Case 03-15-03-FOl' POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION REPORT MEMO March 24, 2003 TO: Belinda Stewart Superintendent, WCCW FROM: Steven B. Baxter Investigator, WCCW SUBJECT: Possible Staff Misconduct: AC William Gregg Polygraph examinations were administered on 3/23/03 to the three main witnesses in the AC Gregg case; the results of the examination are as follows: Inmate • • Did Ray Ray ever touch your butt? - she answered YES ands was Not attempting deception Did Ray Ray ever say you were going to owe him a blow job? - she answered YES and was Not attempting deception Inmate • • iI'J0e!tliV• •f.vas asked the following questions: ,~Q,(J~as asked the following questions: Did AC Gregg ever ask to watch you and your girlfriend having sex? - she answered YES and was Not attempting deception Did Ray Ray ever say to you that he needed a blow job? She answered Yes but the results were not adequate to form a opinion of truth or deception **lnmatei. . . . . . .flM:i:XuCnl'& . a s asked the following questions: Did Ray Ray ever touch your butt? - she answered yes but according to the polygraph results she WAS attempting deception when she answered • . Did Ray Ray ever say to you that he needed a blow job? - She answered yes but the ' polygraph wasnotable to establish a defmite opinion as to the truth or deception of her answer. ' • 87 ** Due to multiple self-arm scars on her wrists the finger plates had to be attached to her toes - only the second time this examiner has done this, and may have impacted the results. Conclusion: the results of the examination have two inmates are being honest when they say that AC Gregg has made sexual comments to them. One inmate was said to be truthful when she said that AC Gregg has touched her on her butt. 88 GSa POLYGRAPH SERVICES William D. Tufts th Ave CT. SW Puyallup, WA 98371 1409 18 POLY6BAPH EXAMINATION REPORT Investigator Steve Baxter Department of Corrections Washington Correction Center for Women PO Box 17 Gig Harbor, WA98335 TO: Subject: 111iii11969 DOB: Examination Date: 03/23/03 Offense: Statement Verification Investigator Steve Baxter Requested by: Purpose of Examination: To verify or refute the subject's allegation that Ray Ray said to her that she was goingto owe him a blow job and that he touched her butt. Prior to the polygraph examination, the subject was advised of her Polygraph Rights and waived these rights by sighing the attached form. . CONCLUSIONS A polygraph examinationwas administered to the subject on the above issue. Based on the physiological responses produced by the subject on four (4) polygraph charts, in the opinion of this examiner, she was not attempting deception when she answered "yes" to the following relevant question: 1. Did Ray Ray ever touch your butt? 2. Did Ray Ray ever say you were goingto owe him a blow job? \.......)b r - .\::;-•• ---::> Examiner: William D. Tults March 23, 2003 Date ofRej:lOrt 90 POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION STATEMENT OFCONSENT Date 3--J],~O 3 Time / Examination 0 "-__, understand a polygraph examination administered by GSLR polygraph services for the~_~N:....::':.cC",C.=-vJ is being conducted ,,- _ concemini5iJ:1~;-DtJ(II,C,I41-t~ I also understand rhar I cannot be required to submit to a polygraph exarnination without my consent. Additionally, that if the answers during the examination show deception, I may be asked to explain. [hold GSR polygraph services and William Tufts harmless and free from any, liability for any acts or omission by any other parties or agencies and release and hold harmless arry persons or agencies from any and all claims or liabilities alleged to result from or . arise out of this examination. Understanding that I have the unqualified right to refuse, r do hereby, this date, voluntarily and without duress, coercion, unlawful inducement, or promise of reward, agree to submit to a polygraph examination. I further understand that the information obtained during this process will not be released tome. "···:·'·'_,·,.. {.~·:.J.·i.;i.'" Date "'7"'C-'-==_-=-_-.-_'- 91 GSR POLYGRAPH SERVIcmi William D. Tufts 140918'" Ave CT. SW Puyallup, WA 98371 POLyc;.1lAPH EXAMINATION REPORT TO: Investigalor Steve Baxter Department of Corrections Washington Correction Center for Women PO Box 17 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Subject: Examination Date: 03/23/03 008: Offense: StatementVerification Requested by: Investigator Steve Baxter Purpose of Examination: To verify or refute the subject's allegation that Ray Ray asked her to watch while she was having sex with her girlfriend and that he stated he neededa blow job. Prior to the polygraph examination, the subject was advised of her Polygraph Rights and waived these rights by signing the attached form. CONCLUSIONS A polygraph examination was administered to the subject on the abOve issue. Based on the physiological responses produced by the subject on three (3) polygraph charts, in the opinion of this examiner, she was not attempting deception when she answered 'yes" to the following relevant question: .- - 1. Did Ray Ray ever ask to watch you and your girlfriend having sex? Based on the erratic physiological responses produced by t!le subject on three (3) polygraph charts, in the opinion of this examiner, .chart recordirgswere not adequate to fOI1)1 a definite opinion as to truth or deception when she answered "yes" to the following relevant question: 1. Did Ray Ray ever sayto you that he needed a blow job? 1 _March 23, 2003 Examiner: William D. TUfts Date of Report 92 GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES WIlliam D. Tufts 1409 18th Ave CT. SW Puyallup, WA 98371 POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION REPORT TO: Investigator Steve Baxter Department of Corrections Washington Correction Center for Women PO Box 17 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Subject: Examination Date: II1II1971 DOB: . Offense: 03/23/03 Statement Verification Investigator Steve Baxter Requested by: ; Purpose of Examination: To verify or refute the subject's allegation that Ray Ray stated he needed a blow job and that he touched her on her butt. Prior to the polygraph examination, the subject was advised of her Polygraph Rights and waived these rights by signing the attached form. CONCLUSIONS A polygraph examination was administered to the subject on the above issue. Based on the physiological responses produced by the subject on three (3) polygraph charts, in theopinion of this examiner, she was attempting deceptionwhen she answered "yes" to the folloWing relevant question: 1. Did Ray Ray ever touch your butt? J Based on the erratic physiCllogical responses produced by the subjedon three (3) polygraph charts,in the opinion of this examiner, chart recordings Were not adequate to form a·definite opinion as to truth or deception when she answered "yefi' to the, following relevant question: . 1.. Did R~y Ray ever say to you that he needed a blow job? NOTE:.$tated ~hej"lt very badly that ~he neverrepo~ed Ray Ray (Ale G.reg) when he toucry7c1.P~~,~~.lts~oUI~alsobe noted that due to the multiple ~rs (finQerFatrs) was attached to her toes. \.A~~.y~ . Examiner: William D. . tllfts . on her wnst. thegsr ' . March 23. 2003 Date Of Report 93 POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION STATEMENT OF CONSENT Examination of I, , understand a polygraph examination Wee- w is being conducted concerning ~..,. VLtl, ~e Ilrf~. I also understand that I administered by GSR polygraph services' for the cannot be required to submit to a polygraph examination without my consent. Additionally, that if the answers during the examination show deception, I may be asked to explain. I hold GSR polygraph services and William Tufts harmless and free from any liability for any acts or omission by any other parties or agencies and release and hold harmless any persons or agencies from any and all claims or liabilities alleged to result from or arise out of this examination. Understanding that I have the unqualified right to refuse, do hereby, this date, voluntarily and without duress, coercion, unlawful inducement. or promise of reward, agree to submit to a polygraph examination. I further understand that the information obtained during this process will not be released to me. Witness -4===- ..:::....... , 94 ," r ! . '_,L" :J-" ; .:' --,~;.~ -,{ , ,:1 '.,)I I~ iU -',I.,. " -- 98