U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs

Bureau of Justice Statistics
July 2005, NCJ 210333

Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003

Sexual Violence Reported
by Correctional Authorities, 2004
By Allen J. Beck, Ph.D.
and Timothy A. Hughes
BJS Statisticians
On September 4, 2003, President
George W. Bush signed into law the
Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003
(P.L. 108-79). The legislation requires
the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
to develop new national data collections on the incidence and prevalence
of sexual violence within correctional
facilities. This report fulfills the requirement under Sec. 4 (c)(1) of the act for
submission of an annual report on the
activities of the Bureau with respect
to prison rape.
As an initial step in a multiphase implementation strategy, BJS completed the
first-ever national survey of administrative records on sexual violence in adult
and juvenile correctional facilities.
Although data are limited to incidents
reported to correctional authorities
during 2004, the survey provides an
understanding of how administrators
respond to sexual violence. The survey
also collects basic counts of substantiated incidents, characteristics of
victims and perpetrators, and sanctions
imposed.
Survey results should not be used to
rank systems or facilities. Future data
collections, including victim reports of
sexual violence in surveys of current
and former inmates, are being developed to permit reliable comparisons.

Highlights
Survey selected more than 2,700 correctional facilities holding
79% of all adults and juveniles in custody

Total

Number of
facilities
2,730

Population
covered
1,754,092

Prison systems
1,404
1,318,616
Local jails
404
331,768
Private prisons/jails
32
31,086
State juvenile
systems*
510
41,196
Local/private
juvenile facilities
297
21,739
Other facilities
83
9,705
*Includes the District of Columbia.

y The survey met the requirement that
BJS draw a random sample, or other
scientifically appropriate sample, of not
less than 10 percent of facilities.
y Entire systems were selected to
maximize reporting coverage. Local
and private facilities were selected with
probabilities proportionate to the
number of adults or juveniles held.

8,210 allegations of sexual violence reported Nationwide in 2004

Total
Prison systems
Local jails
Private prisons/jails
State juvenile
systems
Local/private
juvenile facilities
Other facilities

Reported
in survey
5,528

National
estimate
8,210

3,456
699
67

3,456
1,700
210

931

931

359
16

1,890
20

y 42% of allegations involved staff

sexual misconduct; 37%, inmate-oninmate nonconsensual sexual acts;
11%, staff sexual harassment; and
10%, abusive sexual contact.
y Correctional authorities reported
3.15 allegations of sexual violence per
1,000 inmates held in 2004.

Correctional authorities substantiated nearly 2,100 incidents of sexual
violence, 30% of completed investigations
Rate per
y Males comprised 90% of victims
Number
1,000 inmates
and perpetrators of inmate-on-inmate
National estimate
2,090
0.94
nonconsensual sexual acts in prison
Total reported
1,213
0.69
and jail.
Prisons - Federal
Prisons - State
Local jails
Private prisons/jails
State juvenile
systems
Local/private
juvenile facilities
Other facilities

47
611
210
17

0.31
0.52
0.63
0.55

212

5.15

108
8

4.97
0.82

y In State prisons 69% of victims of
staff sexual misconduct were male,
while 67% of perpetrators were female.
y In local jails 70% of victims of staff
sexual misconduct were female; 65%
of perpetrators, male.

facilities. The methods will rely on selfadministered surveys to provide
anonymity to victims when reporting
their experiences. At the same time,
Between January 1 and June 15, 2005,
computer-assisted technologies will
BJS completed the first national survey Administrative records alone cannot
ensure uniform conditions under which
provide reliable estimates of sexual
of the incidence and prevalence of
inmates complete the survey, and
sexual violence in correctional facilities. violence. Due to fear of reprisal from
sampling techniques and supplemental
perpetrators, a code of silence among
The Governments Division of the U.S.
Census Bureau was the data collection inmates, personal embarrassment, and data collections will reduce potential
biases. (See box below for an update
lack of trust in staff, victims are often
agent for the survey. The survey was
of these activities.)
reluctant to report incidents to correcconducted to provide information on
tional authorities. At present there are
occurrences of sexual violence based
The 2004 administrative survey
no reliable estimates of the extent of
on allegations brought to the attention
of correctional authorities. Although the unreported sexual victimization among provides the basis for the annual statistical review, as required under the act.
results are limited to incidents reported prison and jail inmates and youth held
Though limited to basic counts, these
in residential facilities.
to officials and officially recorded
survey data will be used by the Review
during 2004, the survey provides an
BJS is developing and testing methods Panel on Prison Rape within the
understanding of what officials know,
for more fully measuring the incidence Department of Justice for purposes of
how many allegations were reported,
conducting public hearings concerning
of sexual violence in correctional
how many were substantiated, basic
BJS conducts the first annual
administrative records collection

National implementation of victim
self reports to begin in 2006
BJS works toward full implementation
of the Prison Rape Elimination Act.
Since January 2004 BJS has entered
into cooperative agreements with –
1. RTI International (Raleigh, NC)
to develop and test the adult prison
and jail collection methodologies
2. Westat, Inc. (Rockville, MD) to
develop and test methodologies for
measuring sexual violence in State
and local juvenile facilities
3. National Opinion Research Center
(NORC) (Chicago, IL) to develop
and test methods of collecting data
from soon-to-be released and
former prisoners.

characteristics of victims and perpetrators, and sanctions imposed on perpetrators.

As of June 30, 2005, the following
work had been completed or was
underway:
Prison and jail inmates
y An ACASI questionnaire for adult
inmates had been developed and
reviewed by over 40 prison and jail
administrators, prisoner rights
advocates, and researchers.
y Paper-and-pencil interview (PAPI)
forms were under development,
including forms translated into the
five most frequent foreign
languages (in addition to Spanish)
spoken by inmates; forms for
inmates considered too dangerous
for interaction with survey staff; and
forms to gather administrative data
on all inmates.

Though underlying survey methodology and logistical procedures differ
y Survey materials and methods had
with each of the data collection efforts,
been submitted to the Office and
the measurement strategies will be
Management and Budget (OMB)
consistent. The surveys will consist of
and to an Institutional Review Board
an Audio Computer-Assisted Self(IRB) for approval to conduct tests.
Interview (ACASI) in which respony Procedures for selection of prison
dents interact with a computerand jail facilities and for sampling
administered questionnaire using a
inmates within selected facilities
touch-screen and follow audio instruchad been developed.
tions delivered via headphones. The
use of ACASI is expected to overy A formal pretest in 10 State prisons,
come many limitations of previous
5 Federal prisons, and 10 local jails
research. (See Data Collections for
is planned for October 2005.
the Prison Rape Elimination Act of
2003, June 2004, NCJ 206109.)
2

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Youth in residential placement
facilities
y A draft ACASI questionnaire for
juveniles had been developed and
will be reviewed in a national
workshop of stakeholders in
September 2005.
y Survey procedures and draft
questionnaires have been submitted to an IRB for approval to begin
conducting cognitive testing.
y A formal pretest of collection
methods in up to 20 juvenile facilities is planned for November 2005.
Former and soon-to-be-released
prisoners
y An ACASI questionnaire and
administrative records form were
being developed to survey former
inmates under active parole or postcustody supervision.
y Activities were expanded to include
the development of methods to
survey soon-to-be-released prisoners in community-based facilities.
y Cognitive testing is planned for
September 2005.
National implementation of data
collections is scheduled to begin with
a 10% sample of prisons and jails in
June 2006, and a sample of juvenile
facilities in December 2006.

Survey covers more than 2,700 adult a representative sample was drawn of
local jails, jails in Indian country, faciliand juvenile correctional facilities
ties operated by the Bureau of
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
The 2004 survey included all Federal
(ICE), privately operated adult prisons
and State prison systems, Stateand jails, and privately or locally
operated juvenile facilities, and facilioperated juvenile facilities. Altogether,
ties in the United States operated by
the administrative survey covered
the U.S. military (table 1). In addition,
2,730 of the 8,663 facilities specified by
the act. These facilities housed more
How sexual violence was measured
than 1.7 million inmates, or 79% of all
adults and juveniles held at midyear
The definition of “rape” as required under the Prison Rape Elimination Act of
2004.
2003 was operationalized by disaggregating sexual violence into two categories of inmate-on-inmate sexual acts and two categories of staff sexual
The survey was based on 11 separate
misconduct. The inmate-on-inmate categories reflected uniform definitions
samples corresponding to the different
formulated by the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, in
types of facilities covered under the
“Sexual Violence Surveillance: Uniform Definitions and Recommended Data
act. (See Methodology, page 10.) Each
Elements,” Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The categories were –
sample was designed in accordance
with the requirement that BJS draw a
Nonconsensual sexual acts
random sample, or other scientifically
Contact of any person without his or her consent, or of a person who is unable
appropriate sample, of not less than
to consent or refuse; and
10% of facilities. Entire systems were
• Contact between the penis and the vagina or the penis and the anus
selected, when possible, to maximize
including penetration, however slight; or
reporting coverage. Local and private
• Contact between the mouth and the penis, vagina, or anus; or
facilities were sampled to ensure at
• Penetration of the anal or genital opening of another person by a hand,
least one in each State and with selecfinger, or other object.
tion probabilities proportionate to the
number of adults or juveniles held at
Abusive sexual contacts
the time of the last facility census.
Contact of any person without his or her consent, or of a person who is unable
to consent or refuse; and
Table 1. Facilities selected for the
• Intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia,
Survey of Sexual Violence, 2004
anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person.
Number
Selected

the operation of correctional facilities
with the highest and lowest incidence
of sexual violence. The number of
allegations and substantiated incidents
for each system and sampled facility
in the survey is provided. (See Appendix tables.)

Definitions of staff sexual misconduct and staff sexual harassment were based
on “Training for Investigators of Staff Sexual Misconduct,” prepared by the
National Institute of Corrections.
Staff sexual misconduct
Any behavior or act of a sexual nature directed toward an inmate by an
employee, volunteer, official visitor, or agency representative. Romantic
relationships between staff and inmates are included. Consensual or
nonconsensual sexual acts include:
• Intentional touching of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh,
or buttocks with the intent to abuse, arouse, or gratify sexual desire; or
• Completed, attempted, threatened, or requested sexual acts; or
• Occurrences of indecent exposure, invasion of privacy, or staff voyeurism
for sexual gratification.
Staff sexual harassment
Repeated verbal statements or comments of a sexual nature to an inmate
by employee, volunteer, official visitor, or agency representative, including:
• Demeaning references to gender or derogatory comments about body
or clothing; or
• Profane or obscene language or gestures.

Facility type
Total
Prisons
Public - Federal
Public - State
Private
Local jails
Public
Private
Juvenile facilities
Public - State
Public - Local
Private
Other facilities
Indian country jails
Military-operated
ICE-operatedb

of
facilities
8,663

in 2004
survey
2,730

84
1,320
264

Alla
Alla
27

3,318
47

404
5

510
685
2,275

Alla
69
228

70
59
31

10
Alla
14

a
The 2004 survey included all State
prison and juvenile systems, all Federal
facilities, and all facilities operated by
the U.S. military.
b
Includes facilities operated by or exclusively for the Bureau of Immigration and
Customs Enforcement.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

3

not report any data. Jail authorities had
Two-thirds or more of systems and
facilities able to fully report the most similar reporting capabilities, with 88%
using the survey definitions.
serious forms of sexual violence
After consulting with experts in sexual
victimization, prison rape researchers,
and corrections administrators, BJS
developed uniform definitions of sexual
violence. (See box on page 3.)
Incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual
violence were classified as nonconsensual sexual acts and abusive sexual
contacts. Incidents of staff-on-inmate
sexual violence were separated into
staff sexual misconduct and staff
sexual harassment. Incidents varied in
seriousness, ranging from the least
serious, harassment, to the most
serious, rape. For purposes of this
report, all such incidents are considered sexual violence.
The most serious forms of sexual
violence (inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts and staff sexual
misconduct) were the most widely
reported using survey definitions and
reporting rules (table 2).
Correctional authorities in two-thirds of
prison systems and more than threequarters of sampled jails were able to
report incidents of nonconsensual acts
as defined in the survey. Fewer were
able to report data fully on abusive
sexual contacts, with 25% of prison
systems and 14% of jails including the
lesser forms of sexual violence among
counts of nonconsensual sexual acts.
Compared to prison and jail authorities,
juvenile authorities had a greater
capacity to adopt the survey’s uniform
definitions and reporting rules for
youth-on-youth sexual violence. More
than 80% of authorities responsible for
local and privately operated juvenile
facilities were able to report data using
the categories provided.
Most prison administrators (35) were
able to report data on staff sexual
misconduct using survey definitions;
9 were unable to separate sexual
harassment from misconduct; 3 could
report data on some but not all of the
occurrences during the year; 4 could
4

Fewer prison administrators were able
to report comparable data on staff
sexual harassment. Among prison
administrators, 9 were unable to
separate harassment from other forms
of staff sexual misconduct, and 13 did
not have any data on staff sexual
harassment.
Variations in the reporting capacities of
State juvenile systems and local or
private juvenile facilities were similar.
Some administrators of State systems
were unable to separate staff sexual
misconduct from sexual harassment
(6) or unable to report any data on
sexual harassment (4). Operators of
local and private juvenile facilities,
which typically house small numbers
of youth, had the greatest capacity to
report data using survey definitions.
Nearly 90% of these facilities reported
data on staff misconduct and
harassment.

Caution needed when interpreting
the 2004 survey results
In completing the 2004 survey, correctional administrators frequently
expressed concern about the absence
of uniform definitions and differential
reporting capabilities. Many indicated a
commitment to improving their
offender-based information systems
and grievance tracking systems to
conform to future survey requirements.
During 2005 BJS expects to work with
administrators to improve reporting,
especially those with systems too large
for manual searches of paper files.
The absence of uniform reporting and
tracking procedures necessitates
caution when interpreting the 2004
survey results. The data should not be
used to rank systems or facilities.
Higher or lower counts may reflect
variations in definitions, reporting
capacities, and procedures for recording allegations and not differences in
the underlying incidence of sexual
violence.

Table 2. Reporting capabilities of adult and juvenile correctional authorities
to provide data on sexual violence, 2004

Type of sexual violence
Total

Federal and
State prison
systems

Local
jails

State
Local/private
juvenile
juvenile
systemsa facilities

51

404

50

270

Nonconsensual sexual acts
Full reporting
Partialb
Includes abusive sexual contacts
Unable to report

34
4
13
0

315
30
55
4

37
2
10
1

221
13
30
6

Abusive sexual contacts
Full reporting
Partialb
Combined with other sexual acts
Unable to report

26
3
13
9

343
0
55
6

38
0
10
2

230
2
30
8

Staff sexual misconduct
Full reporting
Partialb
Includes sexual harassment
Unable to report

35
3
9
4

357
10
32
5

40
4
6
0

240
12
14
4

Staff sexual harassment
Full reporting
Partialb
Combined with staff sexual misconduct
Unable to report

27
2
9
13

365
0
32
7

37
3
6
4

252
0
14
4

a
Includes the District of Columbia and all States, except Arkansas which did not operate
any juvenile facilities.
b
See Appendix tables for systems and facilities that reported for only part of the year, some
but not all facilities, or only incidents that were completed or substantiated.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Number of allegations
of sexual violence
during 2004
Reported National
in survey estimatea
5,528
8,210

More than 5,500 allegations of
sexual violence reported in survey
All selected correctional systems and
facilities responded except four:
y Navajo Department of Corrections,
Window Rock, AZ
y Colorado Boys Ranch,
La Junta, CO
y Homme Youth Family Program,
Wittenberg, WI
y Residential Treatment Center,
Yonkers, NY
Reports of sexual violence varied
across systems and sampled facilities,
with every State prison system except
New Hampshire reporting at least one
allegation of sexual violence. Among
the 404 sampled local jails, 166 (41%)
reported an allegation. Among Stateoperated juvenile systems, 46 reported
at least one allegation. (Iowa, Montana,
South Dakota, and Wyoming were the
exceptions.) About a third of sampled
local and privately operated juvenile
facilities (96) reported at least one
allegation.
Combined, the 2004 survey recorded
5,528 allegations of sexual violence.
Taking into account weights for
sampled facilities, the estimated total
number of allegations for the Nation
was 8,210. Prison systems reported
42% of all allegations; local or private
juvenile facilities, 23%; local jails, 21%;
and State juvenile systems, 11%.

Total
Prison systems
Local jails
Private prisons and jails
State juvenile systems
Local/private
juvenile facilities
Other facilitiesb

3,456
699
67
931

3,456
1,700
210
931

359
16

1,890
20

Juvenile facilities reported the
highest rates of alleged sexual
violence
State-operated juvenile facilities, often
required by law to record all allegations
and report them to State and local law
enforcement authorities and child
protective services, had the highest
rates of alleged staff sexual misconduct (11.34 allegations per 1,000
youth). Local and privately operated
juvenile facilities reported 3.22 allegations of staff sexual misconduct per
1,000 youth, nearly 3 times the rate in
State prison systems (1.12 per 1,000
inmates) and Federal prisons (1.33).

a
Among sampled facilities, totals were
estimated based on the reported number of
allegations times the inverse of the probability
of selection, and then summed.
b
Includes jails in Indian country and facilities
operated by ICE and the U.S. military.

Nearly 42% of the reported allegations
of sexual violence involved staff sexual
misconduct, 37% involved inmate-oninmate nonconsensual sexual acts;
11% staff sexual harassment; and 10%
inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual
contact.

Because many States have laws specifying that all sexual acts involving youth
below certain ages are nonconsensual,
rates of alleged nonconsensual sexual
acts were high in juvenile correctional
facilities. In 2004 there were an
estimated 7.31 allegations of youth-onyouth nonconsensual sexual acts per
1,000 youth in local or private juvenile
facilities and 6.75 allegations per 1,000
in State juvenile facilities. These rates
were more than 6 times the inmate-oninmate rate in State prison systems
(1.05 per 1,000) and nearly 7 times the
rate in local jails (.97 per 1,000). Only
jails in Indian country had a higher rate
(10.48); but, due to the small number
of reported allegations, the rate is
unstable. (See Methodology, page 10.)

Expressed in terms of rates, there
were 3.15 allegations of sexual
violence per 1,000 inmates held in
2004 (table 3). Rates of staff sexual
misconduct were the highest with 1.31
allegations per 1,000 inmates, followed
by inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual
sexual acts, (1.16 allegations per
1,000). Rates of alleged abusive
sexual contacts (0.33) and staff sexual
harassment (0.36) were the lowest.

Table 3. Allegations of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates, by type of facility, 2004

Type of facility
Total

Inmate-on-inmate sexual violence
Number of Nonconsensual sexual acts
Abusive sexual contacts
Staff sexual misconduct
Staff sexual harassment
inmates
Number of Rate per
Number of Rate per
Number of Rate per
Number of Rate per
covered
allegations 1,000 inmates allegations 1,000 inmates allegations 1,000 inmates allegations 1,000 inmates
1,754,092

2,027

1.16

579

0.33

2,298

1.31

624

0.36

151,650
1,166,966
27,682

17
1,229
12

0.11
1.05
0.43

66
221
14

0.44
0.19
0.51

201
1,305
26

1.33
1.12
0.94

-417
14

/
0.36
0.51

331,768
3,386

322
0

0.97
/

65
0

0.20
/

225
1

0.68
0.30

87
0

0.26
/

Juvenile facilities
State-operated
Local or private

41,196
21,739

278
159

6.75
7.31

131
82

3.18
3.77

467
70

11.34
3.22

55
48

1.34
2.21

Other facilities
Indian country jails
Military-operated
ICE-operated

477
2,355
6,873

5
3
2

10.48
1.27
0.29

0
0
0

/
/
/

0
2
1

/
0.85
0.15

0
0
3

/
/
0.44

Prisons
Public - Federal
Public - State
Private
Local jails
Public
Private

- - Not reported. / Not calculated.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

5

External authorities often involved
in investigating allegations
Allegations involving youth in State,
local or private facilities are typically
investigated by external authorities,
such as the State police, sheriff’s
department/local police, office of
inspector general, division of social
services, child protective services, and
other agencies serving youth. Nearly

80% of local/private juvenile agencies
and 64% of State juvenile systems
indicated that external authorities had
sole or shared responsibility for investigating allegations of youth-on-youth
sexual violence (table 4). In contrast, in
21 of the 51 prison systems (41%) and
195 of 404 sampled jails (48%) external authorities had a responsibility for
investigating allegations of inmate-oninmate sexual violence.

Table 4. Responsibility for investigating allegations of nonconsensual sexual
acts and staff sexual misconduct, by type of facility, 2004
State juvenile Local or private
juvenile facilitiesb
systemsa

State and
Federal prisons
Pi
51

Local
jails
404

50

270

Nonconsensual sexual acts
Internal
Shared with external authority
External authorities only
Not reported

29
13
8
1

203
82
113
6

18
10
22
0

56
31
182
1

Staff sexual misconduct
Internal
Shared with external authority
External authorities only
Not reported

22
18
11
0

166
95
127
16

14
18
18
0

69
45
156
0

Total

a
b

Table 5. Allegations of sexual violence in State prisons, local jails,
and private prisons and jails, 2004

Inmate-on-inmate
nonconsensual sexual acts
Substantiated
Unsubstantiated
Unfounded
Investigation ongoing
Inmate-on-inmate
abusive sexual contacts
Substantiated
Unsubstantiated
Unfounded
Investigation ongoing
Staff sexual misconductb
Substantiated
Unsubstantiated
Unfounded
Investigation ongoing
Staff sexual harassment
Substantiated
Unsubstantiated
Unfounded
Investigation ongoing

Local jails
Number Percenta

Private prisons
and jails
Number Percenta

1,229
152
392
322
355

100%
17.6
45.3
37.2

322
73
117
78
41

100%
27.2
43.7
29.1

12
0
8
4
0

100%
0.0
66.7
33.3

221
57
126
22
16

100%
27.8
61.5
10.7

65
22
31
9
3

100%
35.5
50.0
14.5

14
2
0
3
0

100%
40.0
0.0
60.0

1,305
321
588
166
230

100%
29.9
54.7
15.4

225
81
42
52
38

100%
46.3
24.0
29.7

27
13
6
6
2

100%
52.0
24.0
24.0

417
81
218
58
60

100%
22.7
61.1
16.2

87
34
22
14
12

100%
48.6
31.4
20.0

14
2
10
2
0

100%
14.3
71.4
14.3

Note: Comparable data for inmate-on-inmate sexual violence in the Federal Bureau
of Prisons were not available.
a
Percents based on allegations for which investigations had been completed.
b
The Federal Bureau of Prisons reported 201 allegations of staff sexual misconduct and
sexual harassment: 11 were substantiated; 96 unsubstantiated; 11 unfounded; 77 investigation ongoing; and 6 disposed of administratively.

6

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

In State prisons fewer than 20% of
allegations of nonconsensual sexual
acts were substantiated
Allegations reported in 2004 were
classified as:
y substantiated, if they were determined to have occurred
y unsubstantiated, if the evidence was
insufficient to make a final determination that they occurred
y unfounded, if they were determined
not to have occurred
y investigation ongoing, if a final determination had not been made at time
of data collection.

Includes the District of Columbia and all States, except Arkansas.
Excludes 20 sampled facilities that were out-scope (not covered under the act).

State prisons
Number Percenta

Responsibility for investigating allegations of staff sexual misconduct was
left to the prison authorities in 22
systems (43%), jail authorities in 166
local jails (41%), State juvenile authorities in 14 State systems (28%), and
local/private juvenile authorities in 69
facilities (26%). In other systems and
facilities, allegations were either
referred to external authorities or were
jointly investigated.

Overall, inmate-on-inmate allegations
of sexual violence were less likely to be
substantiated than allegations of staff
sexual misconduct. Based on allegations in State prisons for which investigations had been completed, 18% of
nonconsensual sexual acts were
substantiated, compared to 30% of
allegations of staff sexual misconduct
(table 5). In jails 27% of completed
investigations of nonconsensual sexual
acts were substantiated, compared to
46% of the allegations of staff sexual
misconduct.
The most common outcome of investigations of sexual violence was a determination of lack of evidence. Nearly
55% of allegations of staff sexual
misconduct in prison and 45% of
allegations of inmate-on-inmate
nonconsensual sexual acts were
unsubstantiated. More than a third
(37%) of completed investigations of
nonconsensual sexual acts in State
prison and 29% in local jails were
determined to be unfounded.

In juvenile facilities a third of the
alleged nonconsensual sexual acts
were substantiated
Based on allegations in State-operated
juvenile facilities for which investigations had been completed, 33% of
youth-on-youth nonconsensual sexual
acts were substantiated, compared to
15% of allegations of staff sexual
misconduct (table 6). In local or private
juvenile facilities, 33% of completed
investigations of nonconsensual sexual
acts were substantiated, compared to
17% of the allegations of staff sexual
misconduct.
About half of all allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts were determined
to be unsubstantiated: 53% in State
juvenile facilities; 49% in local/private
facilities. More than a third of alleged
incidents of staff sexual misconduct in
State juvenile facilities were determined to be unfounded (39%); nearly
30% in local/private facilities.
State juvenile authorities reported 212
substantiated incidents of sexual
violence, 24% of allegations for which
investigations had been completed.
Local and private juvenile authorities
reported 108 substantiated incidents,
31% of completed investigations. State
prison officials reported 611 substantiated incidents (24%); and jail administrators 210 (35% of completed
investigations). Federal prison authorities, reporting data only for staff sexual
misconduct and harassment, indicated
that 11 of the allegations had been
substantiated and another 6 disposed
of administratively through termination
or resignation. As a percentage of
completed investigations, 14% of
allegations were substantiated or
administratively resolved.

Table 6. Allegations of sexual violence in State juvenile systems
and local or private juvenile facilities, 2004
State-operated
juvenile facilities
Number Percent*

Local or private
juvenile facilities
Number Percent*

Youth-on-youth
nonconsensual sexual acts
Substantiated
Unsubstantiated
Unfounded
Investigation ongoing

278
85
137
38
13

100%
32.7
52.7
14.6

159
49
72
26
4

100%
33.3
49.0
17.7

Youth-on-youth
abusive sexual contacts
Substantiated
Unsubstantiated
Unfounded
Investigation ongoing

131
42
49
13
3

100%
40.4
47.1
12.5

82
42
34
6
1

100%
51.2
41.5
7.3

Staff sexual misconduct
Substantiated
Unsubstantiated
Unfounded
Investigation ongoing

467
69
204
175
20

100%
15.4
45.5
39.1

70
11
34
19
6

100%
17.2
53.1
29.7

Staff sexual harassment
Substantiated
Unsubstantiated
Unfounded
Investigation ongoing

55
16
27
9
3

100%
30.8
51.9
17.3

48
6
17
23
2

100%
13.0
37.0
50.0

*Percents based on allegations for which investigations had been completed.
Substantiated incidents
of sexual violence, 2004
Rate per
Number 1,000 inmates

During 2004 correctional authorities
substantiated nearly 2,100 incidents
of sexual violence
The survey of administrative records
recorded 1,213 substantiated incidents
of sexual violence. Taking into account
sampling of local jails, private prisons
or jails, and local/private juvenile facilities, the estimated total for the Nation
was 2,090. Relative to the number of
inmates, there were 0.94 substantiated
incidents of sexual violence per 1,000
inmates reported in 2004.
The rates of substantiated incidents of
sexual violence were highest in juvenile
facilities. State juvenile administrators
reported 5.15 substantiated incidents
per 1,000 youth; local and private
administrators reported 4.97 per 1,000
youth. These victimization rates were
nearly 10 times those reported in State
prisons (0.52 substantiated incidents
per 1,000 inmates) and 8 times those
in local jails (0.63 per 1,000 inmates).

National estimate

2,090

0.94

Total reported

1,213

0.69

47
611
210
17

0.31
0.52
0.63
0.55

212

5.15

108
8

4.97
0.82

Prisons - Federal*
Prisons - State
Local jails
Private prisons/jails
State-operated
juvenile facilities
Local or private
juvenile facilities
Other facilities

*Includes 36 guilty findings of abusive sexual
contacts involving cases spanning more than
1 calendar year.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

7

Males comprised 90% of victims and Approximately, 90% of reported victims
of inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual
perpetrators of nonconsensual
sexual acts in State prison were male;
sexual acts in prison and jail
87% of the reported victims in local
Characteristics of victims and perpetra- jails (table 7).
tors of inmate-on-inmate sexual
violence generally reflected the overall Among victims of abusive sexual
composition of the adult inmate popula- contacts, women were over represented compared with the general
tion. At midyear 2004 males repreinmate population. Females comprised
sented 93% of State prisoners and
88% of local inmates. (See Prison and 46% of victims of abusive sexual
contacts in State prison, and 28% of
Jail Inmates at Midyear 2004, April
the victims in local jails.
2005, NCJ 208801.)
Table 7. Characteristics of victims and perpetrators in substantiated incidents
of sexual violence in adult correctional facilities, by type, 2004

Type of incident

Number of
substantiated
incidents

Victims
Male Female

Perpetrators
Male
Female

Total

838

567

342

558

341

Nonconsensual sexual acts
State prisons
Local jails
Private jails and prisons

152
73
0

133
66
0

15
10
0

145
70
0

14
5
0

Abusive sexual contacts
State prisons
Local jails
Private jails and prisons

57
22
2

37
28
2

32
11
0

49
31
2

17
7
0

Staff sexual misconduct
State prisons
Local jails
Private jails and prisons

321
81
13

188
41
5

86
96
7

82
73
6

165
40
7

Staff sexual harassment
State prisons
Local jails
Private jails and prisons

81
34
2

52
15
0

39
45
1

53
45
2

50
34
2

Note: Details on victims and perpetrators were not provided for all substantiated incidents.

Table 8. Characteristics of victims and perpetrators in substantiated incidents
of sexual violence in juvenile correctional facilities, by type, 2004

Type of incident
Total

Number of
substantiated
incidents

Victims
Male
Female

Perpetrators
Male
Female

320

302

161

256

141

Nonconsensual sexual acts
State-operated
Local or private facilities

85
49

77
46

16
18

64
34

17
8

Abusive sexual contacts
State-operated
Local or private facilities

42
42

32
29

42
19

33
30

44
10

Staff sexual misconduct
State-operated
Local or private facilities

69
11

80
17

36
10

55
14

49
8

Staff sexual harassment
State-operated
Local or private facilities

16
6

17
4

11
9

20
6

4
1

Note: Details on victims and perpetrators were not provided for all substantiated incidents.

8

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Juvenile authorities reported that girls
comprised 17% of the victims of youthon-youth nonconsensual sexual acts in
State-operated facilities, 28% of the
victims in local/private facilities (table
8). Compared to their percentages
among youth held in juvenile facilities
nationwide, girls were over-represented
among victims. In the Census of
Juveniles in Residential Placement,
conducted by the Office of Juvenile
Justice and Delinquency Prevention in
2001, girls accounted for 11% of the
youth in State facilities and 17% of the
youth in local and private facilities.
Female staff implicated in staff
sexual misconduct in prisons; male
staff in local jails
Characteristics of victims and perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct differed
among correctional systems and
facilities:
y In State prisons 69% of victims of
staff sexual misconduct were male,
while 67% of perpetrators were
female.
y In local jails 70% of victims were
female; 65% of perpetrators, male.
y In State-operated juvenile facilities,
69% of victims were male; 47% of
perpetrators, female.
y In local/privately operated juvenile
facilities, 63% of the victims and
64% of the perpetrators were male.
Perpetrators of staff sexual harassment, involving incidents of demeaning
references to gender, derogatory
comments about an inmate’s body, or
use of obscene language, were divided
between male (58%) and female (42%)
staff.
Overall, correctional authorities
reported data on 716 perpetrators of
staff sexual misconduct or staff sexual
harassment. Of these perpetrators,
50% were female staff.

Table 9. Sanctions imposed on perpetrators of inmate-on-inmate and youth-on-youth sexual violence,
by type of correctional facility, 2004

Sanction
Total

State prison
systems
Number Percent

Local jails
Number Percent

State-operated
juvenile systems
Number Percent

Local or private
juvenile facilities
Number Percent

36

100%

42

100%

27

100%

40

100%

Legal sanction
Arrested
Referred for prosecution
Given new sentence

31
11
30
9

86%
31
83
25

32
10
29
6

76%
24
69
14

19
8
19
6

70%
30
70
22

20
10
16
1

50%
25
40
3

Change in custody
Solitary confinement or segregation
Higher custody within same facility
Transferred to another facility

32
30
14
26

89%
83
39
72

31
30
23
5

74%
71
55
12

19
16
11
12

70%
59
41
44

26
10
12
13

65%
25
30
33

Internal discipline
Confinement to own cell or quarters
Loss of good time/increase in "bad" time
Given extra work
Loss of privileges

27
11
21
3
20

75%
31
58
8
56

25
15
4
0
20

60%
36
10
0
48

21
15
12
2
20

78%
56
44
7
74

29
12
9
2
25

73%
30
23
5
63

Note: Data based on correctional systems and facilities that reported one or more
substantiated nonconsensual sexual act or abusive sexual contact involving inmates or youth.
*Detail sums to more than total, since systems or facilities may impose more than one sanction on perpetrators.

Most prisons and jails imposed
legal sanctions on perpetrators of
inmate-on-inmate sexual violence
To better understand how correctional
authorities respond to incidents of
sexual violence, the survey included
questions on sanctions imposed on
perpetrators. Authorities who had
reported at least one substantiated
inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual
sexual act or abusive sexual contact
were asked to report all of the
sanctions that had been imposed.
A legal sanction, including arrest, referral for prosecution, or new sentence,
was imposed on perpetrators in –
y 86% of the 36 prison systems
reporting a substantiated incident
y 76% of the 42 jail facilities
y 70% of the 27 State-operate
juvenile systems
y 50% of the 40 local/private
juvenile facilities (table 9).
A change in custody was also a
frequently reported sanction. Authorities in 89% of State prison systems
and 74% of local jails with a substantiated incident reported that perpetrators
were moved

to solitary confinement, changed to a
higher custody level, or transferred to
another facility as a result of sexual
violence. A change in custody was
imposed on perpetrators in 65% of the
local/private juvenile facilities and 70%
of State-operated juvenile systems.

authorities indicated that 55% of the
staff had been discharged, 36%
referred for prosecution, and 9% disciplined but not discharged. An additional
but unknown number of staff had
resigned before investigations had
been completed.

In addition, authorities with substantiated incidents during 2004 reported
use of other sanctions, including

State adult and juvenile systems
reported the largest numbers of staff
referred for prosecution. In State
prisons, 117 staff in substantiated
incidents of sexual misconduct had
been referred for prosecution (39%); in
State-operated juvenile systems 44
staff (41%). In local jails staff involved
in incidents of sexual misconduct were
less likely to have been referred for
prosecution (18%).

y loss of good time in 58% of State
prison systems and 44% of Stateoperated juvenile systems
y loss of privileges in 56% of State
prisons, 48% of local jails, 74% of
State juvenile systems; and 63% of
local/private juvenile facilities
y confinement to cell or quarters in
56% of State juvenile systems and
30% of local/private juvenile
facilities.
90% of perpetrators of staff sexual
misconduct discharged or referred
for prosecution
The survey collected data on 539 staff
implicated in 508 substantiated
incidents of staff sexual misconduct
during 2004 (table 10). Correctional

The most common sanction imposed
on staff involved in sexual harassment
of inmates was discipline but not
discharge or prosecution. During 2004,
129 staff were implicated in the 140
reported incidents of staff sexual
harassment. Of these staff, 60% were
disciplined; 36% discharged; and 4
referred for prosecution.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

9

Table 10. Sanctions imposed on perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct and staff sexual harassment,
by type of correctional facility, 2004
Substantiated
incidents

Staff sexual misconduct
Staff
Staff
Referred for
discharged
disciplined prosecution

Substantiated
incidents

Staff sexual harassment
Staff
Staff
Referred for
discharged
disciplined prosecution

Total

508

296

50

193

140

47

78

4

Prisons
Public - Federal*
Public - State
Private

11
321
12

0
160
11

1
23
0

4
117
5

-81
2

-25
0

-43
2

-1
0

Local jails
Public
Private

81
1

59
1

17
0

17
1

34
0

8
0

22
0

1
0

Juvenile facilities
State-operated
Local or private

69
11

55
10

8
0

44
4

16
6

12
1

7
4

2
0

0
2
0

0
0
0

0
1
0

0
1
0

0
0
1

0
0
1

0
0
0

0
0
0

Other facilities
Indian country jails
Military-operated
ICE-operated

-- Not reported.
*Excludes 10 resignations of Federal prison staff.

Methodology

The following samples were drawn:

Between January 1 and June 15, 2005,
BJS, with the Governments Division of
the U.S. Census Bureau as its collection agent, conducted the 2004 Survey
of Sexual Violence. The survey was the
first-ever survey of correctional
systems and facilities, designed to
measure the number of reported
incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual
violence and staff-on-inmate sexual
misconduct. Based on administrative
records, the 2004 survey was designed
to provide an understanding of what
corrections officials know, what information is recorded, how allegations
and substantiated incidents are
handled, where incidents occur and
how officials respond to allegations
brought to their attention. It was not
designed to rank systems or facilities.

1. The survey included all 50 State
adult prison systems and the Federal
Bureau of Prisons. Prison administrators were directed to report only on
incidents of sexual violence that
occurred within publicly operated adult
facilities.

Sampling design
The survey was based on 11 separate
samples, corresponding to the different
facilities covered under the act. Each
sample was designed in accordance
with the requirement that BJS draw a
random sample, or other scientifically
appropriate sample, of not less than 10
percent of all Federal, State, and
county prisons, and a representative
sample of municipal prisons.

10

2. A sample of 27 privately operated
prison facilities was drawn to represent
a 10% sample of the 264 private
prisons identified in the 2000 Census
of State and Federal Adult Correctional
Facilities. Facilities were sorted by
region and average daily population
and then sampled with probabilities
proportionate to size. Each sampled
facility was then weighted to provide a
national sum reflecting the total
average daily population of inmates
held in private prisons in the 12-month
period ending June 30, 2000.

Jurisdictions were sorted into 6 strata,
based on size, and then sampled
systematically, to provide a representative national sample. A total of 77 jurisdictions were sampled with certainty
(corresponding to the largest jurisdiction in each State plus 31 jurisdictions
selected due to their large size). An
additional 327 jurisdictions were
selected from 4 strata, with probabilities of selection proportionate to size.
Jail administrators were directed to
report on all publicly operated facilities
within their jurisdiction. Each facility
was then weighted to provide a
national estimate for inmates held in
local jails.

4. A sample of 5 privately operated jails
was also elected based on the data
reported in the 2003 Deaths in Custody
collection. Facilities were sorted by
region and size. The measure of size
was the number of inmates held on
December 31, 2002, plus the number
of new admissions in 2003. Facilities
3. Publicly operated jail facilities were
selected based on data reported in the were selected systematically using a
random start and a fixed sampling
2003 Deaths in Custody collection.
This collection provided the most up-to- interval. Each facility was then
date measure of jurisdiction size corre- weighted to provide a total sum of
inmates corresponding to the number
sponding to the total number of
of inmates at risk to sexual violence in
inmates held on December 31, 2002,
private jails in 2003.
plus the number admitted in 2003.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

5. The survey included all Stateoperated juvenile correctional facilities
in 49 States and the District of Columbia. (Arkansas was the only State that
did not operate a juvenile facility.)
Based on the 2003 Census of
Juveniles in Residential Placement
(CJRP), States operated a total of 510
juvenile correctional facilities.
6. A separate sample was drawn from
the 685 locally operated juvenile facilities identified in the 2003 Census. In
meeting the requirement under the act
to select a 10% sample, with at least
one facility in each State, the largest
locally-operated facility in each State
was selected (37). An additional 32
facilities were then sampled from
among the remaining facilities. Facilities were first sorted by region and
facility type (commitment and
non-commitment) and then ordered by
size (the number of youth with
assigned beds on the day of the
Census). Facilities were then selected
with probabilities proportionate to size.
7. A separate sample was drawn from
the 2,275 privately operated juvenile
facilities also identified in the 2003
Census. At total of 57 facilities were
selected with certainty, corresponding
to the largest facility in each State (51),
and 6 other large facilities. An
additional 171 facilities were selected
from the remaining 2,218 facilities by
forming 8 strata (based on region and
facility type). Within each stratum,
facilities were sorted by size (total
youth with assigned beds) and then
sampled with probabilities proportionate to size.
8. Three additional samples of other
correctional facilities were drawn to
represent a) jails in Indian country (10
selected from a total 70 based on
probabilities proportionate to size); b)
military-operated facilities (all of the 59
facilities operated the Armed Services
in the continental U.S.); and c) 14 facilities operated by the Bureau of
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(excluding contract facilities holding
inmates exclusively for ICE).

The Bureau of Justice Statistics is
the statistical agency of the U.S.
Department of Justice. Lawrence
A. Greenfeld is director.
Allen J. Beck and Timothy A. Hughes
wrote this report. Paige M. Harrison
provided statistical assistance.
Lauren E. Glaze and Thomas P.
Bonczar verified the report, and Tom
Hester edited it.
Timothy A. Hughes and Paige M.
Harrison, under the supervision of
Allen J. Beck, designed the survey,
developed the questionnaires, and
monitored data collection and data
processing.

Pamela H. Butler, Lisa A. McNelis,
Greta B. Clark, and Monica R. Hill,
carried out data collection and
processing, under the supervision of
Charlene M. Sebold, Governments
Division, Census Bureau, U.S.
Department of Commerce. Arthur W.
Ciampa, Regina M. Yates, Patricia D.
Torreyson, and Pearl E. Chase
assisted in data collection. Suzanne
M. Dorinski drew the facility samples
and provided sampling weights.
July 2005 NCJ 210333
Office of Justice Programs
Partnerships for Safer Communities
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov

Comparing systems and facilities
Data for each correctional system and
sampled facility are displayed in the
Appendix tables. (See pages 13 to 39.)
In each table a measure of population
size has been provided as a basis of
comparison. These measures include:
y Custody population on June 30,
2004, for State and Federal prison
systems (the most recent counts from
the National Prisoners Statistics data
series);
y Average daily population during
2004, for local jails, private jails and
prisons, and other adult correctional
facilities (collected specially for the
survey);
y Number of youth held on December 31, 2004, for State juvenile
systems and local or private juvenile
facilities (collected specially for the
survey).
These population counts still mask
underlying differences in systems and
facilities related to the total number of
inmates or youth who were at risk to
sexual victimization during 2004. Such
differences result from variations in
length of stay, and further complicate
drawing reliable comparisons of
systems and facilities.
The 2004 survey results should not be
used to rank systems or facilities.

This report in portable document
format and in ASCII, its tables, and
related statistical data are available
at the BJS World Wide Web Internet
site:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/
The 2004 Survey of Sexual Violence
comprised six separate questionnaires corresponding to types of
correctional systems and facilities.
Copies of the questionnaires in
Portable Document Format (pdf) are
available on the BJS website. Click
on Publications.
Variations in the number of allegations
and substantiated incidents may reflect
differences in definitions and reporting
criteria, as well as variations in procedures for recording allegations and in
the thoroughness of subsequent investigations. Nevertheless, the 2004
survey provides an understanding of
what officials know and how they
respond to incidents brought to their
attention.
Future data collections, based on
victim reports of sexual violence in
surveys of current and former inmates,
are being developed to permit reliable
comparisons that overcome the limitations of administrative records.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

11

Appendix table 1a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by State or Federal
prison authorities, by type, 2004
Prisoners
in custody,
6/30/2004a
Total

Reported inmate-on-inmate
nonconsensual sexual acts
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported inmate-on-inmate
abusive sexual contacts
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

1,318,616

1,246

152

392

322

287

93

126

22

151,650
1,166,966

17
1,229

0
152

-392

-322

66
221

36
57

-126

-22

Alabamac
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Californiac,d

24,768
3,158
26,833
12,655
160,703

6
0
18
4
23

2
0
4
1
23

2
0
12
0
0

1
0
2
3
0

-0
1
4
--

-0
0
0
--

-0
1
1
--

-0
0
3
--

Coloradoe
Connecticut
Delaware
Floridac
Georgiag

16,609
18,814
6,778
77,647
44,026

5
6
3
75
51

3
0
0
2
0

1
5
2
56
16

1
0
1
4
4

-0
2
---

-0
0
---

-0
2
---

-0
0
---

Hawaii
Idahof,g
Illinois
Indianac
Iowaf

3,877
4,621
44,379
21,236
8,611

6
3
17
18
4

0
3
1
0
4

6
-12
16
--

0
-2
1
--

0
-3
-10

0
-0
-10

0
-2
---

0
-1
---

Kansas
Kentucky
Louisianah
Maine
Marylandc

9,181
10,814
16,672
1,986
23,622

21
7
1
0
3

2
2
0
0
1

8
4
0
0
2

11
1
1
0
0

12
3
1
0
--

6
0
0
0
--

5
2
1
0
--

1
1
0
0
--

Massachusetts
Michiganc,i
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri

10,043
48,111
7,827
11,456
30,139

12
39
13
3
17

2
17
4
0
3

5
22
6
0
11

5
0
2
2
2

23
-1
0
15

7
-0
0
1

11
-1
0
11

5
-0
0
0

Montanag
Nebraska
Nevadac
New Hampshire
New Jerseyc

2,074
4,053
10,152
2,426
23,752

2
12
15
0
1

1
0
4
0
0

1
11
2
0
1

0
1
6
0
0

-0
-0
--

-0
-0
--

-0
-0
--

-0
-0
--

New Mexicoe,i
New York
North Carolinac
North Dakota
Ohio

3,703
64,778
35,219
1,176
42,231

4
15
15
0
86

1
2
0
0
14

2
11
7
0
18

1
0
7
0
46

-1
-2
32

-0
-2
4

-1
-0
16

-0
-0
9

Oklahoma
Oregong
Pennsylvaniag
Rhode Island
South Carolinag

17,727
12,678
39,823
3,494
23,321

29
16
9
9
14

2
5
3
3
1

17
7
6
3
0

1
3
0
3
7

15
--1
--

1
--0
--

8
--1
--

0
--0
--

South Dakota
Tennessee
Texasi
Utahc
Vermontc

3,157
14,306
139,148
4,550
1,632

2
8
550
18
6

0
2
13
2
1

0
0
78
12
5

2
1
197
1
0

2
-59
---

0
-2
---

2
-51
---

0
-2
---

Virginia
Washingtonc
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

29,514
16,765
3,987
21,560
1,174

5
12
12
31
3

1
4
11
7
1

0
0
0
24
1

1
0
1
0
1

0
-16
17
1

0
-15
8
1

0
-1
9
0

0
-0
0
0

Federal
State

b

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not
shown).
- - Not reported.
a
Excludes inmates in private facilities. Counts were based on National
Prisoner Statistics (NPS-1A), 2004.
b
Allegations were reported for occurrences in 2004; findings may include
cases from previous years.
c
Nonconsensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts.
d
Information provided for period January 1 to June 30, 2004, only.

e
Reports of abusive sexual contacts were based on a broader
category of inmate sexual misconduct.
f
Allegations limited to substantiated occurrences only.
g
Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not in a central database.
h
Louisiana conducted a manual search of records in 2 facilities with a
combined capacity of 2,406 beds.
i
Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts may include reports of other
acts of inmate sexual misconduct.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

13

Appendix table 1b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates
reported by State and Federal prison authorities, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with inmates
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported allegations of staff
sexual harassment of inmates
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Total

1,506

332

684

177

417

81

218

58

Federala
State

201
1,305

11
321

96
588

11
166

-417

-81

-218

-58

Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Californiaa

5
4
54
15
126

3
3
19
1
75

0
0
34
3
17

2
0
1
7
15

4
5
32
5
--

0
4
9
0
--

1
0
13
1
--

3
0
0
2
--

Coloradob
Connecticut
Delaware
Floridac
Georgiac,d

20
0
7
181
--

5
0
1
10
--

6
0
6
143
--

8
0
0
2
--

-0
5
---

-0
4
---

-0
0
---

-0
1
---

Hawaii
Idahoa
Illinoisc
Indiana
Iowae

11
17
2
40
2

4
11
0
17
2

5
4
0
17
--

1
1
2
6
--

0
--27
5

0
--8
5

0
--9
--

0
--10
--

Kansas
Kentuckya
Louisianaf
Maine
Marylandc

39
42
18
4
5

13
11
0
3
1

13
26
7
0
1

7
5
10
1
3

1
-6
2
--

0
-0
0
--

0
-2
0
--

1
-3
0
--

Massachusettsc
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri

28
23
33
9
45

2
3
7
1
16

2
5
13
5
21

7
11
9
3
5

-39
18
1
130

-1
13
0
25

-23
4
1
68

-14
0
0
20

Montanac
Nebraska
Nevadaa
New Hampshire
New Jerseya

3
12
2
0
9

0
4
0
0
0

3
2
1
0
9

0
5
0
0
0

-4
-0
--

-2
-0
--

-2
-0
--

-0
-0
--

New Mexicoc
New York
North Carolinaa,e
North Dakota
Ohioc

1
181
13
1
26

0
12
13
1
6

0
125
-0
8

1
0
-0
2

-99
-1
--

-1
-0
--

-81
-0
--

-0
-1
--

Oklahoma
Oregonc
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolinaa

11
16
34
4
37

2
4
7
2
8

5
12
26
0
12

0
0
0
2
1

5
-14
3
--

0
-6
0
--

5
-3
1
--

0
-0
1
--

South Dakotad
Tennessee
Texasc
Utah
Vermontc,d

-32
56
7
--

-9
1
2
--

-14
20
2
--

-4
1
0
--

-9
-0
--

-2
-0
--

-4
-0
--

-1
-0
--

Virginia
Washingtonc,d
West Virginia
Wisconsina
Wyoming

51
-24
46
9

16
-16
3
7

13
-5
3
0

4
-2
36
2

0
-1
-1

0
-1
-0

0
-0
-0

0
-0
-1

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations
(not shown).
- - Not reported.
a
Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual
harassment.
b
Reports of staff sexual harassment are included in a broader category
of staff misconduct.

14

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

c

Reports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded in a central
database.
Reports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central
database.
e
Reports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated
allegations only.
f
Reports are based on allegations reported in two facilities.
d

Appendix table 2a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities,
by type, 2004
Reported inmate-on-inmate
Reported inmate-on-inmate
nonconsensual sexual acts
abusive sexual contacts
Average daily
SubUnsubSubUnsubpopulation, 2004 Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded
Total

271,418

322

73

117

78

65

22

31

9

Alabama
Athens Citya
Baldwin County
Jefferson Countyb

10
498
1,057

0
2
0

0
0
0

0
2
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

Arizona
Maricopa County
Yavapai County

8,938
482

11
0

1
0

5
0

1
0

4
0

0
0

2
0

0
0

Arkansas
Craighead County
Pulaski County Regionalb

248
1,095

1
0

0
0

1
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

4,047
2,180
17,451
5,871
56
3,204
4,038
5,615
5,097
1,819
4,050
1,186
1,571

5
0
30
0
0
1
2
5
11
2
1
2
1

0
0
2
0
0
1
1
-0
0
0
1
1

4
0
18
0
0
0
1
-7
0
1
0
0

0
0
2
0
0
0
0
-0
2
0
1
0

2
3
3
0
0
1
2
0
-0
----

0
3
2
0
0
1
1
0
-0
----

1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
-0
----

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0
----

Colorado
Arapahoe County
Denver County
Douglas County

1,299
1,906
259

1
2
0

0
0
0

1
2
0

0
0
0

3
0
0

1
0
0

1
0
0

1
0
0

California
Alameda County
Kern County
Los Angeles County
Orange County
Plumas County
Riverside County
Sacramento County
San Bernardino County
San Diego Countyc
San Francisco City and County
Santa Clara Countyc
Stanislaus Countyc
Ventura Countyc

District of Columbia

3,477

3

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

Florida
Alachua Countyc
Broward County
Charlotte Countyc
Columbia County
Jacksonville City
Leon County
Manatee County
Miami-Dade County
Okaloosa Countya
Orange Countyc
Palm Beach County
Pasco County
Pinellas Countyb
Polk County

957
5,072
423
292
3,414
1,063
1,027
6,721
612
3,380
2,601
1,158
3,213
2,529

11
1
0
0
2
0
5
1
0
3
0
1
0
3

3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1

8
1
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
1

0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
1

-0
-0
0
0
2
0
1
-0
0
0
0

-0
-0
0
0
0
0
0
-0
0
0
0

-0
-0
0
0
2
0
0
-0
0
0
0

-0
-0
0
0
0
0
1
-0
0
0
0

Georgia
Chatham Countyc,d
DeKalb County
Douglas County
Fulton Countyc
Jackson Countyc
Lowndes County
Spalding Countya,b,c

1,414
2,856
674
3,429
147
507
375

0
2
0
16
0
1
0

0
-0
12
0
0
0

0
-0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
1
0

-2
0
--0
--

-0
0
--0
--

-0
0
--0
--

-2
0
--0
--

Idaho
Washington County

27

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

10,479

12

12

0

0

1

1

0

0

Illinois
Cook County

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

15

Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities,
by type, 2004
Reported inmate-on-inmate
Reported inmate-on-inmate
nonconsensual sexual acts
abusive sexual contacts
Average daily
SubUnsubSubUnsubpopulation, 2004 Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded
Indiana
Elkhart County
Howard County
La Porte County
Lake Countyc
St. Joseph County
Wabash County

406
243
282
940
574
95

1
0
5
1
1
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
0
0
1
0
0

0
0
5
0
1
0

1
0
0
-0
2

0
0
0
-0
0

1
0
0
-0
2

0
0
0
-0
0

Iowa
Dubuque Countyc
Hardin Countyc
Polk County

77
62
571

1
1
1

1
0
1

0
0
0

0
1
0

--1

--0

--1

--0

Kansas
Sedgwick County

1,381

0

0

0

0

2

1

1

0

Kentucky
Daviess County
Franklin Countyc
Hopkins Countyc
Louisville Cityc
Woodford Countyc

613
287
390
1,921
72

1
1
6
3
1

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
2
3
0

0
1
4
0
1

0
-----

0
-----

0
-----

0
-----

Louisiana
Caddo Parish
East Baton Rouge Parish
Orleans Parishc
Rapides Parish

1,101
1,580
5,931
939

1
4
10
1

1
0
10
0

0
2
0
1

0
1
0
0

0
--0

0
--0

0
--0

0
--0

Maine
Cumberland County

558

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Maryland
Baltimore Cityd
Baltimore County
Prince George’s County
Wicomico Countyc

4,319
1,092
1,203
536

7
0
1
0

1
0
0
0

1
0
0
0

2
0
1
0

-0
0
--

-0
0
--

-0
0
--

-0
0
--

Massachusetts
Hampden Countyc
Suffolk Countyc
Worcester Countyc

1,861
1,145
1,281

1
4
4

0
0
0

1
0
4

0
4
0

----

----

----

----

Michigan
Macomb County
Van Buren County
Wayne County

1,397
154
2,725

0
1
4

0
1
0

0
0
2

0
0
2

2
0
2

2
0
0

0
0
2

0
0
0

Minnesota
Hennepin County
Sherburne Countyc

604
381

3
0

0
0

0
0

3
0

0
--

0
--

0
--

0
--

Mississippi
Harrison Countyb,c

935

0

0

0

0

--

--

--

--

477
163
98
1,430

1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

1
0
0
0

0
0
---

0
0
---

0
0
---

0
0
---

Montana
Missoula Countyb

397

0

0

0

0

4

1

3

0

Nebraska
Douglas County
Sarpy County

966
164

0
1

0
0

0
0

0
1

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

3,061

1

1

0

0

3

3

0

0

502

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

Missouri
Greene Countyb
Jasper County
Laclede Countyc
St. Louis Cityb

Nevada
Clark Countyb
New Hampshire
Hillsborough Countya

16

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities,
by type, 2004
Reported inmate-on-inmate
Reported inmate-on-inmate
nonconsensual sexual acts
abusive sexual contacts
Average daily
SubUnsubSubUnsubpopulation, 2004 Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded
New Jersey
Cumberland County
Essex Countyc
Gloucester County

589
1,888
337

1
3
2

0
0
0

0
0
0

1
0
2

1
-0

0
-0

0
-0

1
-0

New Mexico
Bernalillo Countyc
Curry County
Dona Ana County
San Juan County

1,882
200
859
660

8
1
0
1

-0
0
0

-0
0
1

-1
0
0

-0
1
1

-0
0
1

-0
0
0

-0
1
0

989
926
13,709
585
334
87

0
0
13
0
3
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
6
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
3
0

-0
-0
-0

-0
-0
-0

-0
-0
-0

-0
-0
-0

North Carolina
Buncombe County
Cabarrus Countyc
Henderson Countyc
Mecklenburg Countyc
New Hanover Countyc

413
202
163
2,046
434

0
1
0
1
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
0

0
0
0
1
0

0
-----

0
-----

0
-----

0
-----

Ohio
Franklin Countyc
Hamilton Countye
Lorain County
Montgomery County
Northwest Regional Cor. Center

2,356
2,057
403
910
588

3
3
1
1
1

1
1
0
0
0

0
2
1
0
0

1
0
0
1
1

--1
0
0

--0
0
0

--1
0
0

--0
0
0

Oklahoma
Dewey Countyc
Oklahoma County
Rogers County

22
2,600
147

0
5
0

0
3
0

0
0
0

0
2
0

-0
--

-0
--

-0
--

-0
--

Oregon
Clackamas Countyc
Jackson County
Multnomah Countyc
Myrtle Creek City
Northern Regional Cor. Fac.b,c
Polk County

349
225
1,497
1
123
105

4
1
0
0
0
0

3
0
0
0
0
0

1
1
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

-1
-0
-3

-0
-0
-2

-1
-0
-1

-0
-0
-0

Pennsylvania
Adams County
Lehigh Countyc
Philadelphia Cityb,d,e

255
1,300
7,493

2
0
1

1
0

1
0

0
0

0
--

0
--

0
--

0
--

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

South Carolina
Beaufort County
Charleston County
Greenville County

194
1,344
1,127

0
3
0

0
0
0

0
2
0

0
1
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

South Dakota
Pennington County

373

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

Tennessee
Hamilton County
Madison Countyc
Nashville-Davidson County
Shelby County
Wilson County

553
445
3,105
2,317
140

1
0
4
3
0

0
0
0
0
0

1
0
4
1
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

Texas
Amarillo City
Bexar County
Dallas Countyc
El Paso County

68
3,770
7,082
2,224

0
3
8
2

0
0
4
0

0
3
0
0

0
0
3
2

0
--2

0
--0

0
--0

0
--2

New York
Erie County Holding Centerc,d
Erie County Correctional Fac.
New York Cityc
Orange County
Schenectady Countyc
Tioga County

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

17

Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities,
by type, 2004
Reported inmate-on-inmate
Reported inmate-on-inmate
nonconsensual sexual acts
abusive sexual contacts
Average daily
SubUnsubSubUnsubpopulation, 2004 Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded
Texas (continued)
Harris Countyc
Jefferson County
Montgomery County
Nueces County
Travis Countyc
Williamson County

7,989
933
726
861
2,356
678

3
0
1
1
3
0

0
0
0
1
1
0

3
0
0
0
2
0

0
0
1
0
0
0

-0
0
0
-1

-0
0
0
-0

-0
0
0
-0

-0
0
0
-1

Utah
Salt Lake County
Utah County
Weber Countyc

2,036
589
1,024

0
4
0

0
0
0

0
2
0

0
2
0

2
1
--

0
0
--

2
1
--

0
0
--

Virginia
Alexandria City
Chesapeake Cityc
Fairfax County
Hampton City
Newport News Cityc
Pamunky Regional
Pittsylvania County
Riverside Regional
Virginia Beach Cityc
Virginia Peninsula Regionalc,d

420
835
1,276
421
643
454
140
1,006
1,365
409

1
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
2
1

1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1

0
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
1
0

--4
0
-0
0
1
---

--1
0
-0
0
0
---

--3
0
-0
0
1
---

--0
0
-0
0
0
---

Washington
King Countyc
Kitsap Countyc
Thurston Countyc
Whatcom Countyc
Yakima County

2,461
367
472
256
947

5
1
3
0
0

1
0
0
0
0

4
0
0
0
0

0
1
3
0
0

----1

----0

----1

----0

West Virginia
North Central Regionalc

499

2

0

2

0

--

--

--

--

Wisconsin
Milwaukee County
Outagamie County
Walworth County
Winnebago Countyc

918
474
306
343

0
1
2
0

0
0
0
0

0
1
2
0

0
0
0
0

0
3
0
--

0
1
0
--

0
2
0
--

0
0
0
--

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown).
- - Not reported.
a
Average daily population was based on data from the Deaths in Custody Reporting Program, 2003 and 2004.
b
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated occurrences only.
c
Non-consensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts.
d
Allegations are limited to completed nonconsensual sexual acts only.
e
Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database.

18

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Appendix table 2b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates
reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with inmates
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded
Total

Reported allegations of staff
sexual harassment of inmates
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

225

81

42

52

87

34

22

14

Alabama
Athens City
Baldwin County
Jefferson Countya

1
0
2

1
0
1

0
0
0

0
0
1

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

Arizona
Maricopa County
Yavapai County

2
1

1
0

0
1

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

Arkansas
Craighead Countya,b
Pulaski County Regionala

0
1

0
1

0
0

0
0

---

---

---

---

California
Alameda County
Kern Countya
Los Angeles Countya
Orange County
Plumas County
Riverside County
Sacramento Countya
San Bernardino Countya
San Diego County
San Francisco City and County
Santa Clara County
Stanislaus County
Ventura County

0
0
0
4
0
1
1
0
2
3
3
0
3

0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1

0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2

2
--0
1
3
--1
0
2
0
0

1
--0
1
1
--1
0
0
0
0

1
--0
0
0
--0
0
1
0
0

0
--0
0
0
--0
0
0
0
0

Colorado
Arapahoe County
Denver County
Douglas County

0
1
1

0
0
1

0
1
0

0
0
0

0
1
4

0
0
4

0
0
0

0
1
0

District of Columbia

25

0

0

21

--

--

--

--

Florida
Alachua County
Broward County
Charlotte County
Columbia County
Jacksonville City
Leon County
Manatee County
Miami-Dade County
Okaloosa County
Orange Countya
Palm Beach Countya
Pasco County
Pinellas Countyc,d
Polk County

0
2
3
1
2
0
1
3
0
0
2
0
3
0

0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0

0
0
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0

0
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0

0
0
0
1
0
1
0
6
0
--0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
--0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--0
0
0

0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
--0
0
0

Georgia
Chatham Countyb
DeKalb County
Douglas County
Fulton County
Jackson County
Lowndes County
Spalding Countya

2
0
1
1
0
0
1

1
0
1
1
0
0
0

1
0
0
0
0
0
1

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
1
0
--

0
0
0
0
0
0
--

0
0
0
0
1
0
--

0
0
0
0
0
0
--

Idaho
Washington County

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Illinois
Cook Countya

1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

19

Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates
reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with inmates
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported allegations of staff
sexual harassment of inmates
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Indiana
Elkhart County
Howard County
La Porte County
Lake County
St. Joseph County
Wabash County

0
0
1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

Iowa
Dubuque County
Hardin County
Polk County

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

Kansas
Sedgwick County

2

0

2

0

1

1

0

0

Kentucky
Daviess County
Franklin Countya
Hopkins County
Louisville Citya
Woodford Countya

0
0
0
2
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
-0
---

0
-0
---

0
-0
---

0
-0
---

Louisiana
Caddo Parish
East Baton Rouge Parisha
Orleans Parish
Rapides Parish

5
0
0
1

3
0
0
1

1
0
0
0

1
0
0
0

3
-1
0

0
-1
0

2
-0
0

1
-0
0

Maine
Cumberland County

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Maryland
Baltimore City
Baltimore County
Prince George’s County
Wicomico County

1
1
2
1

1
1
0
1

0
0
2
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

Massachusetts
Hampden County
Suffolk County
Worcester County

2
3
0

1
0
0

1
0
0

0
2
0

0
0
3

0
0
1

0
0
2

0
0
0

Michigan
Macomb Countyb
Van Buren County
Wayne County

0
0
1

0
0
0

0
0
1

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

Minnesota
Hennepin County
Sherburne County

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
1

0
0

0
0

0
1

Mississippi
Harrison Countya,b

1

1

0

0

--

--

--

--

Missouri
Greene Countya
Jasper County
Laclede County
St. Louis City

0
3
0
1

0
3
0
0

0
0
0
1

0
0
0
0

-3
2
1

-3
1
0

-0
1
1

-0
0
0

Montana
Missoula County

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Nebrasksa
Douglas County
Sarpy County

9
0

8
0

1
0

0
0

2
0

0
0

2
0

0
0

Nevada
Clark Countyb

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

New Hampshire
Hillsborough County

3

0

--

--

0

0

0

0

20

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates
reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with inmates
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported allegations of staff
sexual harassment of inmates
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

New Jersey
Cumberland County
Essex County
Gloucester County

3
3
0

0
0
0

1
2
0

2
0
0

0
1
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
1
0

New Mexico
Bernalillo County
Curry County
Dona Ana County
San Juan County

4
0
1
1

-0
0
0

-0
0
0

-0
0
1

4
0
0
0

-0
0
0

-0
0
0

-0
0
0

4
1
10
2
0
1

1
0
1
0
0
1

0
0
4
1
0
0

1
0
1
1
0
0

-0
-7
-1

-0
-5
-0

-0
-0
-0

-0
-0
-1

North Carolina
Buncombe County
Cabarrus Countya
Henderson County
Mecklenburg County
New Hanover County

1
0
0
2
1

0
0
0
2
0

0
0
0
0
1

1
0
0
0
0

0
-1
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-1
0
0

0
-0
0
0

Ohio
Franklin County
Hamilton Countya
Lorain County
Montgomery County
Northwest Regional Cor. Center

1
1
1
0
2

1
1
0
0
0

0
0
1
0
0

0
0
0
0
2

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

Oklahoma
Dewey Countya
Oklahoma County
Rogers County

2
2
3

1
2
2

1
0
0

0
0
1

-4
0

-0
0

-4
0

-0
0

Oregon
Clackamas County
Jackson County
Multnomah County
Myrtle Creek City
Northern Regional Cor. Facilitya
Polk County

1
0
4
0
1
0

1
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
-0
1
0

0
0
-0
0
0

0
0
2
1
-0

0
0
0
0
-0

0
0
-1
-0

0
0
-0
-0

Pennsylvania
Adams Countya
Lehigh County
Philadelphia Citya

2
2
14

1
1
9

0
1
1

1
0
0

-3
--

-3
--

-0
--

-0
--

South Carolina
Beaufort County
Charleston County
Greenville County

1
1
0

1
0
0

0
1
0

0
0
0

0
2
1

0
0
1

0
1
0

0
0
0

South Dakota
Pennington County

3

3

0

0

2

2

0

0

Tennessee
Hamilton County
Madison County
Nashville-Davidson Countya
Shelby County
Wilson Countya

0
1
0
2
1

0
0
0
2
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
0

0
0
----

0
0
----

0
0
----

0
0
----

1
-1
1

1
-0
1

0
-1
0

0
-0
0

0
-1
1

0
-1
0

0
-0
0

0
-0
0

New York
Erie County Holding Centera
Erie County Correctional Facility
New York Citya
Orange County
Schenectady Countya,c
Tioga County

Texas
Amarillo City
Bexar County
Dallas County
El Paso County

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

21

Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates
reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with inmates
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported allegations of staff
sexual harassment of inmates
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Texas (continued)
Harris County
Jefferson County
Montgomery County
Nueces County
Travis Countyc
Williamson County

3
0
0
0
3
1

1
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
2
0

2
0
0
0
0
1

0
4
0
1
-1

0
1
0
1
-1

0
0
0
0
-0

0
3
0
0
-0

Utah
Salt Lake County
Utah County
Weber Countya

3
1
1

1
1
0

1
0
1

0
0
0

2
0
--

1
0
--

0
0
--

1
0
--

Virgina
Alexandria Citya
Chesapeake City
Fairfax County
Hampton City
Newport News Citya
Pamunky Regional
Pittsylvania County
Riverside Regional
Virginia Beach City
Virginia Peninsula Regional

0
2
0
0
1
1
0
1
6
1

0
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
3
1

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0

-1
0
0
-0
0
1
1
0

-1
0
0
-0
0
1
0
0

-0
0
0
-0
0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
-0
0
0
1
0

Washington
King Countya
Kitsap County
Thurston County
Whatcom Countya
Yakima County

1
1
0
1
0

0
1
0
0
0

0
0
0
1
0

0
0
0
0
0

-0
1
-0

-0
0
-0

-0
0
-0

-0
1
-0

West Virginia
North Central Regional

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Wisconsin
Milwaukee County
Outagamie Countya
Walworth County
Winnebago County

0
0
1
1

0
0
0
0

0
0
1
0

0
0
0
0

3
-0
0

0
-0
0

3
-0
0

0
-0
0

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown).
a
Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment.
b
Reports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated allegations only.
c
Reports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded in a central database.
d
Reports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central database.

22

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Appendix table 2c. Local jail jurisdictions with no allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence
and staff sexual misconduct, 2004
Jurisdiction
Alabama
Carbon Hill Citya
Choctaw County
Covington Countyb
Dallas County
Etowah County
Lauderdale Countyc
Saraland City
Alaska
Kodiak City
Unalaska City
Arizona
Apache County
Coconino County
Graham County
La Paz Countyc
Pima County
Yuma County
Arkansas
Crossett City
Fayetteville City
Hot Spring County
Marianna Citya
Springdale City
Washington County
Yell County
California
El Dorado County
Fresno County
Glendale Cityc
Kings County
Lake County
Nevada County
Sutter County
Florida
Collier County
Hamilton Countyc,d
Indian River County
Santa Rosa County
Georgia
Acworth City
Baker Countya
Clinch Countya
Cobb County
Effingham County
Elbert Countya
McDuffie County
Milledgeville Citya
Peach County
Stewart County
Troup County
Upson County
Washington County
Idaho
Ada County
Bingham County
Elmore Countya
Jerome County

Average daily
population, 2004
1
30
150
178
660
155
6

9
1

121
490
109
195
1,739
628

25
34
22
5
10
251
24

323
3,019
12
311
256
181
273

956
90
475
353

22
4
30
2,083
240
65
161
9
63
90
356
166
50

927
89
31
34

Jurisdiction
Illinois
Bond Countya
Boone County
Du Page County
Ford County
Kendall County
McHenry Countye
Peoria Countyb,f,g,h
Schuyler County
St. Clair Countyc
Washington County
Will County
Indiana
Daviess Countya,c,d,e
Dearborn Countya,c
Delaware Countyd
Johnson County
Knox Countya
Marion Countya
Orange County
Vanderburgh County
Wayne County
Iowa
Adair County
Johnson County
Woodbury County

Average daily
population, 2004
20
95
814
41
131
266
404
21
442
9
521

90
194
274
249
81
1,089
81
329
209

4
77
230

Kansas
Allen County
Butler County
Reno County

23
188
136

Kentucky
Christian County
Clark Countya
Henderson County
Jackson County
Laurel County
Lincoln County Regional
McCracken County
Warren County

690
144
371
85
305
107
422
573

Louisiana
Livingston Parish
Shreveport City
St. Charles Parishc
West Baton Rouge Parish

128
52
338
279

Maine
Penobscot County
Waldo County

156
50

Maryland
Dorchester County
Frederick County

158
452

Michigan
Allegan County
Bay County
Berrien County
Calhoun County
Charlevoix County
Grand Traverse County
Marquette County
Newaygo Countyc

141
214
397
582
65
143
75
195

Jurisdiction

Average daily
population, 2004

Minnesota
Carver Countyc,d
Dakota County
Douglas County
Kandiyohi County
Otter Tail County
Ramsey County
Stearns Countya
Todd County
Winona County

94
222
64
152
82
350
160
45
54

Mississippi
Copiah County
De Soto County
Hinds County
Neshoba County
Rankin County
Union County

49
280
866
43
279
41

Missouri
Dunklin Countyb
Franklin County
Grundy County
Kansas City
Madison County
Sullivan County

70
115
11
177
15
1

Montana
Yellowstone Countye

399

Nebraska
Colfax County
Franklin County
Morrill County
Pierce County

13
5
5
11

Nevada
Las Vegas Cityb,f,g,h
Mineral County

884
22

New Jersey
Bergen County
Morris County

972
286

New Mexico
Artesia City
Roosevelt County

3
75

New York
Monroe County
Oneida Countyc,e
Onondaga County

1,410
415
604

North Carolina
Bertie-Martin Regionala
Craven County
Davidson County
Franklin County
Lenoir County
Moore County
Nash County
Northampton County
Orange County

95
189
235
114
123
92
205
76
130

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

23

Appendix table 2c (continued). Local jail jurisdictions with no allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence
and staff sexual misconduct, 2004
Jurisdiction

Average daily
population, 2004

Jurisdiction

Average daily
population, 2004

Jurisdiction

North Carolina (continued)
Polk Countyg
Robeson Countyc
Rowan County
Union County
Yadkin County

25
417
202
242
28

South Carolina
Allendale County
Berkeley County
Clarendon County
Darlington County
Georgetown County

30
303
65
171
185

North Dakota
Adams County
Cass County

2
200

South Dakota
Lake County
Minnehaha County

11
468

Ohio
Adams County
Allen County
Cleveland City
Darke County
Geauga Countye
Huron County
Mahoning County
Multicounty Cor. Center
Noble County
Trumbull County
Wood County

39
250
204
30
47
100
704
142
14
275
133

Tennessee
Benton Countyc
Blount County
Cumberland County
Fayette Countyc,h
Sevier County
Washington County

63
343
130
97
265
432

Washington
Adams Countya
Kent Cityg
Lynnwood City
Okanogan County
Skamania County
Spokane County

23
140
39
139
26
470

Oklahoma
Adair County
Cleveland County
Garfield County
Jefferson County
LeFlore County
Midwest City

5
190
66
25
68
11

411
251
215
107
21
622

West Virginia
Central Regional
Eastern Regional
South Central Regional

261
368
400

3
571
143
562

13
226
20
877
696
61
486
126
78
218
16
217
7
276
50
155
41
245
516
160
588

Wisconsin
Dodge County
La Crosse County
Ozaukee County
Polk County
Price County
Racine County

Oregon
Cottage Grove City
Lane County
Lincoln Countya
Washington County

Texas
Carrollton City
Comal County
Dallam County
Denton County
Fort Bend County
Grand Prairie City
Gregg County
Hardin County
Jackson County
Kaufman County
Lee County
Maverick County
Menard County
Nacogdoches County
Refugio County
Rockwall County
Shelby Countya,d
Starr County
Taylor County
Walker County
Webb County

Wyoming
Lincoln County
Natrona County

20
258

Pennsylvania
Armstrong County
Blair County
Butler County
Dauphin County
Erie County

112
251
233
1,239
705

Virginia
Albermarle-Charlottesville Reg.b,f,g,h
Augusta County
Blue Ridge Regional
Central Virginia Regional
Chesterfield County
Danville City
Mecklenburg County
Montgomery County
Norfolk City
Smyth County

Average daily
population, 2004

Note: The average daily population for all facilities in Appendix table 2c is 60,350.
a
The average daily population was based on the Deaths in Custody Reporting Program, 2003 and 2004.
b
Reports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded in a central database.
c
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated occurrences only.
d
Reports of staff sexual misconduct are limited to substantiated occurrences only.
e
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed occurrences only.
f
Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts are not recorded in a central database.
g
Reports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central database.
h
Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database.

24

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

484
194
923
380
314
239
126
152
1,639
70

Appendix table 3a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence
reported in private prisons and jails, by type, 2004
Average
Reported inmate-on-inmate
daily
nonconsensual sexual acts
population, Allega- SubUnsubUn2004
tions
stantiated stantiated founded
Total

Reported inmate-on-inmate
abusive sexual contacts
Allega- SubUnsubUntions
stantiated stantiated founded

31,068

12

0

8

4

14

2

0

3

Arizona
Florence Correctional Facility (CCA)
Phoenix West State Prison (CSC)

1,754
440

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

California
California City Correctional Center (CCA)a
Central Valley Community Cor. Fac. (GEO)a

2,620
515

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

---

---

---

---

Colorado
Crowley County Correctional Facility (CCA)a

911

2

0

1

1

--

--

--

--

Florida
Gadsen Correctional Facility (CCA)
Moore Haven Correctional Facility (GEO)
South Bay Correctional Facility (GEO)a

1,036
745
47

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

Georgia
Coffee Correctional Facility (CCA)

1,490

2

0

2

0

11

2

0

0

Louisiana
Allen Correctional Center (GEO)

1,456

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

3

Mississippi
Delta Correctional Facility (CCA)a
Walnut Grove Youth Cor. Fac. (Cornell)

258
758

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

-0

-0

-0

-0

Montana
Community Counseling and Corr. Services

161

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

26

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

New Jersey
Tremont House (VOA)
New Mexico
Torrance County Detention Facility (CCA)a

730

0

0

0

0

--

--

--

--

Ohio
Columbiana County Jail (CiviGenics)
Lake Erie Correctional Institution (MTC)a

183
1,366

0
5

0
0

0
4

0
1

---

---

---

---

Oklahoma
David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center (CCA)a,b
Davis Correctional Facility (CCA)a

1,206
952

0
1

0
0

0
0

0
1

---

---

---

---

Pennsylvania
Joseph Coleman Center (CEC)

227

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Tennessee
Hardeman County Correctional Center (CCA)
South Central Correctional Center (CCA)c,d
Whiteville Correctional Facility (CCA)

1,950
1,620
1,471

0
-0

0
-0

0
-0

0
-0

0
-0

0
-0

0
-0

0
-0

Texas
Bradshaw State Jail (MTC)
Cleveland Correctional Center (GEO)
East Hidalgo Detention Center (LCS)
Jefferson County Jail (CSC)
Lindsey State Jail (CCA)a
Mineral Wells Pre-Parole Facility (CCA)
South Texas Intermediate Sanction Fac. (CSC)a
Val Verde County Jail (GEO)

1,970
519
539
382
1,015
2,060
210
885

1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
---0

0
0
0
0
---0

0
0
0
0
---0

0
0
0
0
---0

Virginia
Lawrenceville Correctional Center (GEO)e

1,566

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not
shown). Initials identify the following: CCA - Corrections Corporation of America.
CEC - Community Education Centers. CiviGenics - CiviGenics Corporation.
Cornell - Cornell Companies, Incorporated. CSC - Correctional Services Corporation. GEO - Global Expertise in Outsourcing. LCS - Louisiana Corrections
Services, Incorporated. MTC - Management and Training Corporation. VOA Volunteers of America.
- - Not reported.
a
Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts.

b

Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to
substantiated occurrences only.
c
Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts are not recorded in a
central database.
d
Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central
database.
e
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to
completed occurrences only.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

25

Appendix table 3b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates
reported in private prisons and jails, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with inmates
sexual harassment of inmates
SubUnsubSubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded
27

13

6

6

14

2

10

2

Arizona
Florence Correctional Facility (CCA)
Phoenix West State Prison (CSC)

Total

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

California
California City Correctional Center (CCA)
Central Valley Community Correctional Fac. (GEO)a

1
1

1
1

0
0

0
0

1
--

0
--

1
--

0
--

Colorado
Crowley County Correctional Facility (CCA)a

3

0

0

3

--

--

--

--

Florida
Gadsen Correctional Facility (CCA)
Moore Haven Correctional Facility (GEO)
South Bay Correctional Facility (GEO)

9
1
1

6
0
1

2
1
0

0
0
0

3
0
4

0
0
0

3
0
4

0
0
0

Georgia
Coffee Correctional Facility (CCA)

1

1

0

0

1

0

0

1

Louisiana
Allen Correctional Center (GEO)

3

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

Mississippi
Delta Correctional Facility (CCA)a
Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility (Cornell)

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

-0

-0

-0

-0

Montana
Community Counseling and Corr. Services

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

New Jersey
Tremont House (VOA)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

New Mexico
Torrance County Detention Facility (CCA)b

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Ohio
Columbiana County Jail (CiviGenics)a
Lake Erie Correctional Institution (MTC)

0
2

0
0

0
0

0
2

-1

-0

-1

-0

Oklahoma
David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center (CCA)a
Davis Correctional Facility (CCA)

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

-0

-0

-0

-0

Pennsylvania
Joseph Coleman Center (CEC)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Tennessee
Hardeman County Correctional Center (CCA)
South Central Correctional Center (CCA)b
Whiteville Correctional Facility (CCA)

0
0
1

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
1
0

0
1
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

Texas
Bradshaw State Jail (MTC)
Cleveland Correctional Center (GEO)
East Hidalgo Detention Center (LCS)
Jefferson County Jail (CSC)
Lindsey State Jail (CCA)
Mineral Wells Pre-Parole Facility (CCA)
South Texas Intermediate Sanction Facility (CSC)a
Val Verde County Jail (GEO)

1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0

1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0

1
0
0
0
1
--0

0
0
0
0
0
--0

1
0
0
0
0
--0

0
0
0
0
1
--0

Virginia
Lawrenceville Correctional Center (GEO)

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown).
Initials identify the following: CCA - Corrections Corporation of America. CEC Community Education Centers. CiviGenics - CiviGenics Corporation. Cornell - Cornell
Companies, Incorporated. CSC - Correctional Services Corporation. GEO - Global
Expertise in Outsourcing. LCS - Louisiana Corrections Services, Incorporated.
MTC - Management and Training Corporation. VOA - Volunteers of America.
- - Not reported.

26

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

a
Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include staff
sexual harassment.
b
Reports of staff sexual misconduct are limited to substantiated occurrences only.

Appendix table 4a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence
reported in other correctional facilities, by type, 2004
Average
daily
population,
2004
Total

Reported inmate-on-inmate
nonconsensual sexual acts
Allega- SubUnsubUntions
stantiated stantiated founded

Reported inmate-on-inmate
abusive sexual contacts
Allega- SubUnsubUntions
stantiated stantiated founded

9,705

10

5

3

1

0

0

0

0

1
1,012
643
699

0
0
0
3

0
0
0
2

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

51
227
416
436
254

0
1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

El Paso, TX
Florence, AZ
Houston, TX
Laredo, TXa
Los Fresnos, TX

553
1,042
499
378
755

0
0
0
1
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
1
0

0
0
0
-0

0
0
0
-0

0
0
0
-0

0
0
0
-0

Miami, FL
San Diego, CA
San Pedro, CAb,c
Tacoma, WA

554
822
483
403

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

7
159
38
61
17

0
4
0
1
0

0
2
0
1
0

0
2
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

--0
0
0

--0
0
0

--0
0
0

--0
0
0

U.S. Military
Air Force
Army
Marine Corps
Navy
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Aguadilla, PRa
Aurora, CO
Batavia, NY
El Centro, CAb
Elizabeth, NJ

Jails in Indian country
Chinle Youth Corrections, AZ
Gila River Dept. of Cor. and Rehab., AZa,b
Gila River Juvenile Det. and Rehab. Ctr., AZ
Hopi Rehabilitation Center, AZ
Navajo Department of Cor.-Crownpoint, NM
Navajo Department of Cor.-Window Rock, AZ
Omaha Tribal Police Department, NEa
Southern Ute Detention Center, CO
Tohono O'odham Detention Center, AZ
Walter Miner Law Enforcement Center-Adult, SD

Refusal
18
44
111
22

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown).
- - Not reported.
a
Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts.
b
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated occurrences only.
c
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed occurrences only.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

27

Appendix table 4b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates
reported in other correctional facilities, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with inmates
sexual harassment of inmates
SubUnsubSubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded
3

2

0

0

3

1

0

2

U.S. Military
Air Force
Army
Marine Corps
Navy

Total

0
1
0
1

0
1
0
1

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Aguadilla, PR
Aurora, CO
Batavia, NY
El Centro, CA
Elizabeth, NJ

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
1

-0
0
0
1

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

El Paso, TX
Florence, AZ
Houston, TX
Laredo, TX
Los Fresnos, TX

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

Miami, FL
San Diego, CA
San Pedro, CA
Tacoma, WA

0
1
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
2

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
2

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

-0
0
0
0

Jails in Indian country
Chinle Youth Corrections, AZ
Gila River Dept. of Cor. and Rehabilitation, AZ*
Gila River Juvenile Detention and Rehabilitation, AZ
Hopi Rehabilitation Center, AZ
Navajo Department of Corrections-Crownpoint, NM
Navajo Department of Corrections-Window Rock, AZ
Omaha Tribal Police Department, NE
Southern Ute Detention Center, CO
Tohono O'odham Detention Center, AZ
Walter Miner Law Enforcement Center-Adult, SD

Refusal
0
0
0
0

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown).
- - Not reported.
*Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include staff sexual harassment.

28

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Appendix table 5a. Allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence reported by State juvenile administrators,
by type, 2004
Number of
youth held
12/31/2004
Total

Reported youth-on-youth
nonconsensual sexual acts
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported youth-on-youth
abusive sexual contacts
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated

Unfounded

41,196

278

85

137

38

131

42

49

13

Alabamaa,b
Alaskab
Arizona
Arkansasc
Californiab,d

592
251
617
0
3,678

5
1
9
-11

5
0
6
-8

0
1
3
-3

0
0
0
-0

--2
---

--1
---

--1
---

--0
---

Colorado
Connecticuta
Delawarea,b
District of Columbiaa
Floridaa

849
66
211
241
2,088

3
0
0
0
15

1
0
0
0
4

1
0
0
0
4

1
0
0
0
4

1
0
-0
5

1
0
-0
2

0
0
-0
1

0
0
-0
0

Georgiaa
Hawaiia,b
Idahob
Illinois
Indianaa,b

6,363
51
412
1,487
1,261

9
0
0
1
13

1
0
0
0
3

8
0
0
1
3

0
0
0
0
0

7
--0
--

0
--0
--

7
--0
--

0
--0
--

243
475
621
451
195

0
9
21
12
0

0
9
7
0
0

0
0
14
3
0

0
0
0
9
0

0
3
2
8
1

0
0
0
0
1

0
2
2
4
0

0
0
0
4
0

679
1,122
435
137
315

16
1
0
3
1

3
1
0
3
1

13
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

16
--4
13

3
--4
13

12
--0
0

1
--0
0

753
113
261
396
119

2
0
1
0
4

0
0
0
0
2

2
0
1
0
1

0
0
0
0
1

1
-0
1
--

0
-0
0
--

1
-0
1
--

0
-0
0
--

New Jerseya
New Mexico
New Yorka
North Carolinaa
North Dakotaa

946
270
1,568
660
94

4
0
2
1
0

0
0
1
0
0

0
0
0
1
0

4
0
1
0
0

6
2
1
0
2

5
1
0
0
2

0
0
1
0
0

1
1
0
0
0

Ohioi
Oklahomae
Oregona
Pennsylvania
Rhode Islande

1,662
372
855
624
220

22
7
0
0
0

1
1
0
0
0

11
4
0
0
0

5
1
0
0
0

2
2
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
0

South Carolinae
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texasj
Utah

818
170
525
4,383
674

20
0
5
62
0

7
0
1
17
0

4
0
2
45
0

8
0
2
0
0

11
0
1
10
0

0
0
1
0
0

6
0
0
10
0

2
0
0
0
0

Vermontg
Virginiaa
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsina
Wyominga

22
1,028
784
269
650
120

0
2
5
-11
0

0
1
0
-2
0

0
1
3
-8
0

0
0
1
-1
0

1
0
19
-10
0

1
0
--7
0

0
0
--0
0

0
0
--3
0

Iowae
Kansase
Kentuckya
Louisiana
Maine
Marylanda
Massachusettsb,e
Michiganb,f,g
Minnesota
Mississippia
Missouria
Montanaa,b
Nebraskah
Nevadae
New Hampshireb,h

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not
shown). - - Not reported.
a
All sexual acts involving youth under age 18 are considered nonconsensual.
b
Non-consensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts.
c
Arkansas does not have any State-operated juvenile facilities.
d
Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database.
e
All sexual acts involving youth under age 16 are considered nonconsensual.
f
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated
occurrences only.

g
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed
occurrences only.
h
All sexual acts involving youth under age 17 are considered
nonconsensual.
i
All sexual acts involving youth under age 14 are considered
nonconsensual.
j
All sexual acts involving youth under age 21 are considered
nonconsensual.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

29

Appendix table 5b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth
reported by State juvenile administrators, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with youth
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported allegations of staff
sexual harassment of youth
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Total

467

69

204

175

55

16

27

9

Alabamaa
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansasb
Californiaa

8
0
12
-12

0
0
6
-2

0
0
2
-3

8
0
4
-1

-0
1
---

-0
0
---

-0
0
---

-0
1
---

Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida

5
2
0
1
30

0
0
0
0
1

2
2
0
1
10

3
0
0
0
16

-1
2
0
10

-0
1
0
3

-1
1
0
1

-0
0
0
6

Georgia
Hawaiia,c
Idaho
Illinoisd
Indiana

7
1
3
0
14

0
1
2
0
9

1
0
0
0
3

6
0
0
0
2

0
-4
-1

0
-1
-1

0
-3
-0

0
-0
-0

Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine

0
7
27
25
3

0
1
3
0
1

0
4
0
5
2

0
2
24
20
0

0
5
5
5
0

0
1
2
0
0

0
4
0
5
0

0
0
1
0
0

Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigana,c
Minnesota
Mississippi

18
2
4
3
0

8
0
0
0
0

10
2
2
0
0

0
0
1
3
0

8
1
-0
0

3
1
-0
0

5
0
-0
0

0
0
-0
0

Missouri
Montanaa
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire

2
0
0
3
2

1
0
0
0
0

1
0
0
1
1

0
0
0
2
1

0
-2
2
2

0
-0
0
1

0
-1
2
1

0
-1
0
0

New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota

16
0
18
3
0

0
0
7
0
0

0
0
5
3
0

16
0
6
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

Ohiod
Oklahoma
Oregona,c
Pennsylvania
Rhode Islandc

9
19
3
4
1

0
1
2
0
1

3
4
0
1
0

5
14
0
3
0

-0
-0
0

-0
-0
0

-0
-0
0

-0
-0
0

South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesseea
Texasd
Utah

6
0
23
138
3

0
0
1
13
3

1
0
0
125
0

4
0
19
0
0

1
0
--3

0
0
--2

0
0
--1

0
0
--0

0
11
14
2
6
0

0
5
0
1
0
0

0
3
3
1
3
0

0
3
9
0
3
0

-0
-1
1
0

-0
-0
0
0

-0
-1
1
0

-0
-0
0
0

Vermonta
Virginia
Washingtona
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown).
- - Not reported.
a
Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment.
b
Arkansas does not have any State-operated juvenile facilities.

30

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

c

Reports of staff sexual misconduct based on
substantiated allegations only.
d
Reports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded
in a central database.

Appendix table 6a. Allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence reported in local
and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004
Number of
youth held
12/31/2004

Reported youth-on-youth
nonconsensual sexual acts
SubUnsubAllegation stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported youth-on-youth
abusive sexual contacts
SubUnsubAllegation stantiated stantiated

Unfounded

10,848

159

49

72

26

82

42

34

6

221
106
12

3
5
1

1
1
0

2
0
1

0
4
0

1
2
--

0
1
--

1
1
--

0
0
--

51

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Arkansas
Alexander Youth Services Centera
Northeast AR Regional Juv Proga,b
Pulaski County Juv Detentiona
Youth Emergency Shelterc

141
38
32
12

2
0
1
1

1
0
0
0

0
0
0
1

1
0
1
0

1
-0
--

1
-0
--

0
-0
--

0
-0
--

California
Barry J. Nidorf Juvenile Halla
Kearny-Mesa Juv Detention Facilityb
Lindsay Programb
Los Padrinos Juvenile Halla
Main Campus, Boys Republica,b
Santa Clara County Juvenile Halla
Trinity-Whitewater

582
208
48
473
134
245
118

1
6
2
4
1
1
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1
6
1
2
0
1
0

0
0
1
1
0
0
0

1
--0
-2
1

1
--0
-0
1

0
--0
-2
0

0
--0
-0
0

Colorado
Excelsior Youth Centerb,d
Greeley Youth Centerb
Threshhold, Cedar Springs, Inc.a,b

164
18
30

3
1
9

0
0
5

2
1
4

1
0
0

----

----

----

----

Florida
Avon Park Youth Academy
Bowling Green Youth Academy
Gulf Coast Youth Academy
Marion Youth Development Centera
Polk Juvenile Correctional Facilitya
South Pines Academy

199
52
92
96
158
64

0
0
2
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
2
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

46

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Illinois
Cook County Juv Temp Det Ctra,b,e
Residential Treatment Ctr, La Villa

402
101

6
2

0
1

3
1

3
0

4
7

0
2

1
4

3
1

Indiana
Campagna Academyb
Kokomo Academya,b
Whites Residential and Family Srvcs

41
116
148

0
1
0

0
0
0

0
1
0

0
0
0

--8

--3

--5

--0

Iowa
Woodward Academy

153

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

51
49
79
57
9

0
2
31
3
0

0
2
8
0
0

0
0
20
3
0

0
0
3
0
0

1
---1

0
---0

1
---1

0
---0

12
36
166

3
1
0

0
0
0

3
0
0

0
1
0

----

----

----

----

77
85

0
2

0
1

0
1

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

Total
Alabama
Camp Mitnicka
Laurel Oaks Behavioral Health Ctr
Treatment Center, Lee Countya,b
Alaska
Jesse Lee Campusa

Georgia
The Bridge, Inc.

Kansas
Forbes Juvenile Attention Center
Judge Riddel Boys Rancha,b
Marillac Centera,b
Newton Campusb
Raymond Cerf Home
Kentucky
Baptist Youth Rancha,b
Dessie Scott Childrens Homeb
Hack Estep Home for Boysb
Louisiana
Florida Parishes Juvenile Detentiona
La Methodist Children's Homea

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

31

Appendix table 6a (continued). Allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence reported in local
and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004
Number of
youth held
12/31/2004

Reported youth-on-youth
Reported youth-on-youth
nonconsensual sexual acts
abusive sexual contacts
Alllega- SubUnsubAllega- SubUnsubtions
stantiated stantiated Unfounded ations
stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Massachusetts
Germaine Lawrence, Inc.a
Stetson School, Inc.

77
110

3
0

3
0

0
0

0
0

3
1

3
1

0
0

0
0

Michigan
Clinton Campus, Holy Cross Servicesd,e
Curtis House, Holy Cross Services
Eagle Village, Inc.a
Michigan Youth Correctional Facilitya
Ottawa Co Juvenile Detention Center
Starr Commonwealth/Albionb

109
12
44
480
29
194

1
6
1
1
0
0

1
1
0
0
0
0

0
5
1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
--

0
0
0
0
0
--

0
0
0
0
0
--

0
0
0
0
0
--

14

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

147

8

2

5

1

--

--

--

--

32
38

9
0

-0

-0

-0

-0

-0

-0

-0

Nebraska
Home Campus Prog. (Boys Town)

447

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

Nevada
Canyon State Academya,b
Clark Co Dept of Juv Just Servicesa
Ridge View Youth Services Centera,b

216
176
481

1
0
2

0
0
2

1
0
0

0
0
0

-0
--

-0
--

-0
--

-0
--

New Mexico
Bernalillo Co Juv Detention Centera

71

1

0

1

0

5

1

4

0

11
75
71
256
118
137

0
0
0
0
0
5

0
0
0
0
0
5

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
2
2
3
2
--

1
2
0
0
2
--

0
0
2
3
0
--

0
0
0
0
0
--

North Carolina
Boys and Girls Home of North Carolina

67

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

North Dakota
The Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch

64

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

Ohio
Catholic Charities Svcs./Parmadalea,b

80

0

0

0

0

--

--

--

--

Oregon
Parrott Creek Residential Programa

Minnesota
Austin Youth Ranch
Missouri
St. James Facilityb
Montana
Inter-Mt Children's Homea
Swan Valley Youth Academya

New York
Cottage 10, Elmcrest Children’s Ctr
Holbrook Agency Operated Boardinga
NYC Dept of Juv Justicea
Residential Center, Canaana
Residential Treatment Ctr, Syosetta
St. Anne Instituteb,d,e

20

0

0

0

0

2

2

0

0

Pennsylvania
Abraxas I (Marienville), Cornella
Abraxas of Ohio (Shelby), Cornella
Berks Co Youth Ctr. (Juv. Detention)b
Campbell Griffin Centera
Colorado Group Home/Shelter (CO)a,b
Evergreen Housed
Harborcreek-Main Campusb
Main Campus, Tunkhannock
Pennsylvania Clinical Schoola,b
Shuman Juvenile Detention Centera,b
St. Gabriel's Halla

267
109
55
244
15
10
108
106
104
78
205

0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
2

0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2

0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0

0
0
-5
-0
-4
--0

0
0
-0
-0
-2
--0

0
0
-5
-0
-1
--0

0
0
-0
-0
-0
--0

Rhode Island
Harmony Hill School

57

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

32

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Appendix table 6a (continued). Allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence reported in local
and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004
Number of
youth held
12/31/2004

Reported youth-on-youth
nonconsensual sexual acts
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported youth-on-youth
abusive sexual contacts
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated

Unfounded

South Dakota
Sky Ranch for Boysa
Springfield Academyb
Western So Dakota Juv Serv

34
73
65

1
3
0

0
0
0

1
0
0

0
3
0

0
-2

0
-2

0
-0

0
-0

Tennessee
Deer Valley
Memphis Boys Town

37
80

0
2

0
2

0
0

0
0

3
2

3
2

0
0

0
0

Texas
Coastal Bend Youth Citya
GEO Grp, Coke Co Juv Just Ctra,b
Hays Co Juv. Det. and Boot Campa
Lifeworks Emergency Shelter

0
203
99
16

2
3
0
0

1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

1
3
0
0

0
-0
2

0
-0
1

0
-0
1

0
-0
0

Utah
Heritage Centera

146

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

Washington
Ruth Dykeman Children’s Center

38

0

0

0

0

2

1

1

0

West Virginia
Main Campus - Davis Stuart, Inc.a
Northern Regional Juv. Det. Ctr.a
Princeton Facilitya,b

36
7
21

2
0
0

2
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

-0
--

-0
--

-0
--

-0
--

Wisconsin
Eau Claire Academya

80

1

1

0

0

6

6

0

0

Wyoming
Residential Treatment, Laramiea,b

57

3

3

0

0

--

--

--

--

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown).
- - Not reported.
a
All sexual acts involving youth under age 18 are considered nonconsensual.
b
Nonconsensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts.
c
Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database.
d
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed
occurrences only.

e
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to
substantiated occurrences only.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

33

Appendix table 6b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth reported in local
and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with youth
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported allegations of staff
sexual harassment of youth
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

70

11

34

19

48

6

17

23

Alabama
Camp Mitnick
Laurel Oaks Behavioral Health Ctr
Treatment Center, Lee Countya

2
2
0

0
0
0

2
0
0

0
2
0

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

Alaska
Jesse Lee Campus

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

Arkansas
Alexander Youth Services Center
Northeast AR Regional Juvenile Program
Pulaski County Juvenile Detention Center
Youth Emergency Shelter

1
1
0
0

0
1
0
0

1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

1
0
0
0

California
Barry J Nidorf Juvenile Hall
Kearny-Mesa Juvenile Detention Facility
Lindsay Program
Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall
Main Campus, Boys Republica
Santa Clara County Juvenile Hall
Trinity-Whitewater

0
0
0
0
1
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
1
0
0

0
0
0
1
-0
0

0
0
0
1
-0
0

0
0
0
0
-0
0

0
0
0
0
-0
0

Colorado
Excelsior Youth Center
Greeley Youth Centera
Threshhold, Cedar Springs, Inc.

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
-0

0
-0

0
-0

0
-0

Florida
Avon Park Youth Academy
Bowling Green Youth Academya
Gulf Coast Youth Academy
Marion Youth Development Center
Polk Juvenile Correctional Facility
South Pines Academy

5
4
0
1
5
1

2
0
0
0
1
0

2
2
0
0
2
1

1
2
0
1
0
0

0
-0
0
0
0

0
-0
0
0
0

0
-0
0
0
0

0
-0
0
0
0

Georgia
The Bridge, Inc.

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

Illinois
Cook Co Juvenile Temporary Detention
Residential Treatment Center

7
2

0
1

7
1

0
0

2
1

1
1

0
0

1
0

Indiana
Campagna Academy
Kokomo Academya
Whites Residential and Family Services

1
0
2

1
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
2

1
-0

1
-0

0
-0

0
-0

Iowa
Woodward Academy

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Kansas
Forbes Juvenile Attention Center
Judge Riddel Boys Rancha
Marillac Center
Newton Campus
Raymond Cerf Home

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
-0
0
2

0
-0
0
0

0
-0
0
2

0
-0
0
0

Kentucky
Baptist Youth Ranch
Dessie Scott Children's Home
Hack Estep Home for Boys

1
0
1

0
0
0

0
0
1

0
0
0

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

Louisiana
Florida Parishes Juvenile Detention Center
La Methodist Children's Home

1
0

0
0

0
0

1
0

1
0

0
0

0
0

1
0

Total

34

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Appendix table 6b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth reported in local
and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with youth
sexual harassment of youth
SubUnsubSubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded
Massachusetts
Germaine Lawrence, Inc.
Stetson School, Inc.

1
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

Michigan
Clinton Campus, Holy Cross Services
Curtis House, Holy Cross Services
Eagle Village, Inc.
Michigan Youth Correctional Facility
Ottawa Co Juvenile Detention Centerb
Starr Commonwealth/Albiona

0
0
0
0
0
1

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
1

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
1
--

0
0
0
0
1
--

0
0
0
0
0
--

0
0
0
0
0
--

Minnesota
Austin Youth Ranch

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Missouri
St. James Facility

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

-0

-0

-0

-0

-1

-0

-1

-0

Nebraska
Home Campus Prog. (Boys Town)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Nevada
Canyon State Academya
Clark Co Dept of Juvenile Justice Services
Ridge View Youth Services Center

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
1
0

0
1
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

New Mexico
Bernalillo County Juv Detention Center

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

New York
Cottage 10, Elmcrest Children’s Center
Holbrook Agency Operated Boarding Home
NYC Dept of Juvenile Justicea
Residential Center, Canaan
Residential Treatment Center, Syosett
St. Anne Institute

0
0
1
1
0
1

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
1
1
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
1

0
2
2
0
2
1

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
2
0
0
0

0
2
0
0
2
0

North Carolina
Boys and Girls Home of North Carolina, Inc.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

North Dakota
The Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Ohio
Catholic Charities Services/Parmadalea

1

0

1

0

--

--

--

--

Oregon
Parrott Creek Residential Programa

0

0

0

0

--

--

--

--

Pennsylvania
Abraxas I (Marienville), Cornell
Abraxas of Ohio (Shelby), Cornell
Berks Co Youth Center (Juv Detention)
Campbell Griffin Center
Colorado Group Home/Shelter (Co)a
Evergreen House
Harborcreek-Main Campus
Main Campus, Tunkhannock
Pennsylvania Clinical School
Shuman Juvenile Detention Center
St. Gabriel's Hall

1
1
0
1
2
1
0
1
2
0
0

0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0

1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0

0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
1
0
-0
1
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
-0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
-0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
1
0
-0
1
0
0
0
0

Rhode Island
Harmony Hill School

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Montana
Inter-Mt Children's Home
Swan Valley Youth Academy

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

35

Appendix table 6b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth reported in local
and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004
Reported allegations of staff
sexual misconduct with youth
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

Reported allegations of staff
sexual harassment of youth
SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded

South Dakota
Sky Ranch for Boys
Springfield Academyb
Western So Dakota Juvenile Services Ctr

0
3
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
3
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

Tennessee
Deer Valley
Memphis Boys Town

0
1

0
0

0
1

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

Texas
Coastal Bend Youth City
GEO Group Coke County Juv Just Ctr
Hays Co Juvenile Detention And Boot
Lifeworks Emergency Shelter

0
4
1
1

0
0
0
1

0
1
0
0

0
3
0
0

0
24
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
10
0
0

0
14
0
0

Utah
Heritage Center

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Washington
Ruth Dykeman Children’s Center

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

West Virginia
Main Campus - Davis Stuart, Inc.
Northern Regional Juvenile Detention Ctr
Princeton Facilitya

0
1
1

0
0
0

0
1
1

0
0
0

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

0
0
--

Wisconsin
Eau Claire Academy

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Wyoming
Residential Treatment, Laramiea

0

0

0

0

--

--

--

--

Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown).
- - Not reported.
a
Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment.
b
Reports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated allegations only.

36

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Appendix table 6c. Private and local juvenile facilities with no allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence
and staff sexual misconduct, 2004

Facility
Alabama
Camp Saylaa,b,c
Jefferson Co. Youth Detention Center
Three Springs School of Madison-Main Campus

Number of
youth held on
12/31/2004
19
84
48

Arizona
4321 South Evergreen Home
Arizona's Children's Association
Maricopa County Juvenile Court Center
Mohave County Juvenile Detention Center
Mountain Facility
Tumbleweed-Open Handsa,c

7
102
267
34
42
12

California
Browning Housed
Camp Barrett
Camp Fred Miller
Camp Joseph M. Paige
Fred Finch Youth Centerb,c
Girls Rehabilitation Facility
House #7
Joplin Youth Center
Main Campus, Optimist Youth Homes
Mid Valley Youth Ctr (Residential Treatment)a
Patrick House
San Jose Home
Silverlake Residence
Trinity-Fair Oaks
Trinity-Main Campus, Residential Treatment Ctr
Trinity-Yucaipa

6
96
112
120
29
50
4
62
93
84
6
6
15
7
70
66

Colorado
Colorado Boys Ranch, La Junta
Cottage 28, El Pueblo Boys and Girls Ranch, Inc.
Jeffco
Jefferson Co Juvenile Residential Work Crew
Connecticut
Apt/Daytop-Alpha House
Lake Grove at Durham
Touchstone
District of Columbia
Dupont III Group Home
Florida
Bay Point Schools (North) Better Outlook Ctr
Blackwater Career Development Center
Brevard Group Treatment Home
Camp-E-Ku-Sumee
Camp E-Ma-Chamee
Camp E-Toh-Anee
Camp E-Tu-Makee
Camp E-Wen-Akee
Gulf/Lake Academy
Kennedy Campus
Manatee Juvenile Boot Camp
Polk Co Juvenile Boot Camp
Georgia
Paulding Regional Youth Detention Center
Hawaii
Emergency Shelter, Salvation Army

Refusal
6
17
14

99
114
20

Facility
Idaho
Emancipation Home, Idaho Youth Ranch
Ranch Campus, Idaho Youth Ranch
Southwest Idaho Juvenile Detention Center

Number of
youth held on
12/31/2004
10
33
48

Illinois
Chaddock
Champaign Co Juvenile Detention Center
Woodridge Facility Program

80
11
110

Indiana
Alternative Housed,e
Christian Havend
La Porte County Juvenile Services Center
Ladoga Academy
Marion County Juvenile Justice Complex
Southwest Indiana Regional Youth Village

30
21
23
85
135
127

Iowa
712 House
Juvenile Detention Center
Rosedale Shelter
Scott Co Juvenile Detention Center
Stop Home #1, #2, #3, Four Oaks
Woodlands Treatment Center
Kansas
Girls Home, Temporary Lodging for Children

7
16
10
8
34
24

8

Kentucky
Louisville Metro Youth Detention Center

45

Louisiana
Juvenile Detentiond

11

Maine
Goodwill Hinckley Home for Boys and Girls
Semi-Independent Living Program

120
4

Maryland
Bowling Brook Prep School
Karma Academy for Boys
Residential Program, Baltimore

136
13
100

7

28
25
20
53
47
39
50
28
97
178
24
67

Massachusetts
Key Program, Inc., Chestnut Street
Springfield Secure Treatment
Spectrum Boys Programd,e
Michigan
Barat Child and Family Servicesf
Monroe County Youth Center
Moreau Center, Holy Cross Children’s Service
Oakland Co Childrens Villagec
St. Jude's Home

7
45
24

15
20
66
272
5

92

7

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

37

Appendix table 6c (continued). Private and local juvenile facilities with no allegations of youth-on-youth
sexual violence and staff sexual misconduct, 2004

Facility
Minnesota
Bar-None Residential Treatment Servicesd,e,f
Bricelyn Group Home
Hennepin County Home School
Mille Lacs Academy
Prairie Lakes Youth Programs
Residential Treatment Center, Duluth
Mississippi
Harrison County Juvenile Detention Center
Henley Young Juvenile Justice Center
Missouri
Hilltop, Jackson Co Court Services
Main Campus, Evangelical Children’s Homes
St Louis (City) Juvenile Detention Center
Montana
Cascade Co Juvenile Detention Center
Nebraska
Douglas Co Youth Center
Epworth Village, Inc.
Father Flanagan’s Emgcy Shelter (Orlando Fl)
Father Flanagan’s Emgcy Shltr (Washington DC)
Father Flanagan’s Emgcy Shltr (Grand Island)
Lancaster County Youth Services Center
Tallahasse Residence: 2752 Hollyhock Hill
Nevada
Silverstate Academy
New Jersey
Essex Co Juvenile Detention Center
Somerset Hills School
Warren Acres Juvenile Detention Center
Women Risingc
New York
Children's Home of Jefferson Co
Hurst Group Home
Lincoln Hall
Shell Farm Children’s Center
Queens Outreach Haven
Residential Treatment Center, Randolph
Residential Treatment Center, Yonkers
Residential Treatment Program-Dewey
Shiller Street Group Home
Woodfield Cottage Secure Detention Facility
North Carolina
Bertie-Martin Beaufort Shelter Home, Inc.-Girls
Guilford Co Juvenile Detention Center
Rainbow House
North Dakota
Northwest Youth Assessment Center
Ohio
Co Detention Center, Cleveland
Co Juvenile Detention Center, Lima
Hamilton Co Juvenile Court Youth Center
Horizon I, The Twelve, Inc.
Oakview Group Home
Rosemont Centere,f

38

Number of
youth held on
12/31/2004
60
5
123
69
28
95

33
24

51
49
61

9

152
65
15
10
7
56
6

140

159
75
11
10

54
11
227
25
9
107
No response
90
9
21

12
28
6

3

80
28
137
8
13
18

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

Facility

Number of
youth held on
12/31/2004

Oklahoma
Comanche Co Regional Juv Detention Center
Oaks Indian Mission (Level C)
Oklahoma Co Juvenile Detention Centerd
Yth and Fmly Services of No Central Oklahoma

22
42
68
7

Oregon
Donald E Long Home (Dept of Multnomah Co)
Girls Ranch, Bob Belloni Ranch, Inc.
St. Mary's Home for Boys

53
7
57

Pennsylvania
Abraxas Leadership Development Program
Allentown Secure Treatment Unit
Bucks County Residential Service Unit
Glen Mills Schoolsf
Henning Shelter
Main Campus, George Junior Republic
Main Campus, Children’s Home of Easton
New Directions Shelter (Pennsylvania)
Northampton Co Juv Justice Centera,b,c
Pressley Ridge at Ohiopyle
Summit Academy
Sweeney Homea,b,c
Treatment Unit for Boys (Unit #2), Fleetwood
York Special Needs Group Home

117
16
9
837
27
492
51
91
27
63
269
12
18
15

Rhode Island
Corkery House, Caritas, Inc.

16

South Carolina
Beaufort Marine Institute
Camp White Pines
Horizon Campus
Juvenile Detention, North Charleston
New Hope Carolinas

28
74
28
47
78

South Dakota
Chamberlain Academy

68

Tennessee
CCA, Shelby Co. Training Centerd,e

185

Texas
Brazoria Co Juvenile Detention Center
Colorado Co. Juvenile Boot Camp
Dallas County Detention Center
Denton Co Juvenile Detention
Sandy Brook Residential Treatment Center
Shelter Harbor (North, South, East, West)

21
97
243
42
27
44

Utah
712 East 25th Street Home
Cinnamon Hills Youth Crisis Centerd,e
County Residential Group Home, Springville
Provo Canyon
Salt Lake Valley Detention Center

12
126
51
220
116

Virginia
Henrico Detention Home
New Dominion School
Newport News Juvenile Detentiona,c
Tidewater Detention Home

19
101
75
68

Appendix table 6c (continued). Private and local juvenile facilities with no allegations of youth-on-youth
sexual violence and staff sexual misconduct, 2004

Facility
Washington
Johnny Robinson Boys Home
Pierce Co Juvenile Court
Wisconsin
Boys Shelter Care, Milwaukee
Focus Unit, Milwaukee
Home Youth Family Program, Wittenberg
Milwaukee County Juvenile Detention Home

Number of
youth held on
12/31/2004
30
139

Facility
Wyoming
Crisis Center, Rock Springs
Normative Services, Inc.

Number of
youth held on
12/31/2004
8
134

38
17
No response
64

Note: Facilities included in this table held 10,891 youth
on December 31, 2004.
- - Not reported.
a
Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts are not recorded in a central
database.
b
Reports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central
database.
c
Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central
database.

d
Reports of staff sexual misconduct are limited to substantiated
occurrences only.
e
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated
occurrences only.
f
Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed
occurrences only.

Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004

39