FOR RELEASE February 23, 2002 at 7:45 AM EST

CONTACT: Steve Tuttle
Director of Government Affairs
TASER International, Inc.
(480) 905-2006

Coroner in Recent In-Custody Fatality Finds TASER® Was Not Cause of Death
Results Consistent with Historical Experience
Similar Results Anticipated in Other Pending Cases
SCOTTSDALE, Ariz., February 22, 2002 - TASER International, Inc. (Nasdaq: TASR and TASRW)
today refuted implications in recent news stories that the ADVANCED TASER may have contributed to
the deaths of several suspects taken into police custody following the use of the device. Three deaths
have occurred since November of 2001 where suspects were subdued using the ADVANCED TASER
and later died in custody. These cases have received significant media attention inquiring whether the
TASER may have contributed to these fatalities.
The first of these cases was closed on January 25th when Butler County Coroner Dr. Richard Burkhardt
signed the death certificate of Marvin Hendrix, an Ohio man who died while in police custody, listing the
cause of death as “cocaine abuse / accidental.” During the investigation, investigators learned that
Hendrix had swallowed a plastic bag containing an “eight-ball” of crack cocaine in efforts to conceal it
from officers. The bag later burst, releasing toxic levels of cocaine.
Two other cases, one in Hollywood, FL and another in Philadelphia, PA remain under investigation.
“Unfortunately, there’s a tendency for people to rush to conclusions in these cases,” said TASER
International CEO Rick Smith. “Every year around 12,000 people die as a result of drug overdoses in the
U.S. Since one of the early indicators of toxic drug levels is violent psychosis and paranoia, many of
these people are confronted by police officers called to protect other citizens during these violent
outbursts. It is not surprising, that some of these people will be hit with the TASER as police seek to
subdue them before they can hurt themselves, or others. If someone is in the throes of a drug overdose,
the application of the TASER will not stop or exacerbate the ongoing chemical reactions that will lead to
the eventual death of the subject.”
“There have been many of these cases since the TASER was first introduced in 1974 – we know of at
least 20,” Smith continued, “However, once the medical reviews have been completed, the TASER has
never been linked as a definitive cause of death in any of these cases. We are confident that the medical
examinations in Hollywood and Philadelphia will yield similar results to the recent incident in Hamilton,
and that the TASER will be cleared from any implication in these deaths.”
In a recent medical review conducted by Dr. Robert Stratbucker, Medical Director for TASER
International and internationally respected expert in the field of electrical safety, Dr. Stratbucker noted, “I
am unaware of any pathophysiological mechanism whereby the application of a TASER-like electrical
stimulus anywhere on the body surface could be the cause of that person’s death some 45 minutes later.
The only plausible cause of death from electrical injury not leaving tell-tale skin lesions -- clearly not
present in any of the cited cases -- is ventricular fibrillation, a fatal disturbance of heart rhythm which
ensues immediately upon shocking the heart with greater-than-threshold, non-Taser-like electric current
pulses. Specifically, if the TASER output were to cause cardiac arrest, it would be immediate.”

“I believe that in the Ohio case at issue (referring to an in-custody death in Hamilton OH), the recorded
time lag of minutes (rather than a few seconds) between application of the TASER and pulseless collapse
of the subject proves beyond reasonable doubt that the TASER was not the cause of death,” Stratbucker
concluded.
Preliminary reports all indicate that the deaths in the remaining two open cases occurred at least minutes
after the TASER application. “We continue to stand behind the safety of our products,” said Smith,
“While we certainly regret the loss of life in these cases, we need to give the authorities time to conduct
their investigations so that medical conclusions can be drawn. For example, in the Philadelphia incident,
the subject was naked in weather 10 degrees below freezing, exhibiting bizarre behavior, and cocaine was
found in the original blood samples. Yet, there is a rush for people to assign blame to the TASER, even
though the subject did not expire until well after the TASER application – clear evidence that the TASER
could not have played a causal role in the fatality.”
“As the use of the TASER becomes more widespread, we can anticipate it will be used to subdue even
more individuals who are in the course of a toxic, fatal overdose. Based on decades of experience and
over 5,000 human volunteers, we are confident the results will continue to exonerate this effective, safe
technology. In order to help people learn more about this complex topic, we have posted additional
information on our website at www.TASER.com.” Smith concluded.
About TASER International, Inc.
TASER International, Inc. provides advanced less-lethal weapons for use in the law enforcement, airlines,
private security, and personal defense markets. Its flagship ADVANCED TASER® product uses
proprietary technology to incapacitate dangerous, combative, or high-risk subjects that may be impervious
to other less-lethal means. This technology reduces injury rates to suspects and officers, thereby lowering
liability risk and improving officer safety. The ADVANCED TASER is currently in testing or
deployment at over 1100 law enforcement and correctional agencies in the U.S. and Canada.
###