Orange County Sheriff - Custody Informant Program, 2017
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
Custody Informant Program Integrity without compromise, Service above self, Professionalism in the performance of duty, Vigilance in safeguarding our community. Assertions • Eliciting statements from charged and represented defendants violating Massiah • Brady violations • Unchecked custodial informant program • Lack of documentation and or record keeping • Discovery Request responses hindering due process Past Practice Note: information was not provided by those who testified during the hearing • Arranged inmate/informant movement to garner information to bolster cases for various agencies • Handled informants internally by gathering notes and sharing w/DA without creating a file • Minimal documentation of informant work product (notes only) • Minimal records or notations related to informant activity Past Practice continued Note: information was not provided by those who testified during the hearing • In specific cases (noted in DeKraai hearing) it appears DA was aware of informant activity and supported operations. Deputies handling informants lacked training and understanding of case law • Records which are kept are not well organized – Ad Seg and PC inmates some of whom have been sources of information Moving Forward • • • • • Department policy CCOM policy Spec Ops created an outside agency agreement Documentation procedures developed and include Training to all classification staff included – Confidential Informants and 6th amendment • Course also developed for all personnel • Improved coordination with subpoena desk and DA – Discovery protocol developed Moving Forward • All informant activities will be documented including work product, movement, notes, and items to DA • Record keeping will be electronic with a file created for all ongoing activity for specific sources of information (in collaboration with investigations). • Continuous training of assigned personnel. Questions