Skip navigation
CLN bookstore

Mdoc Memo on Prisoner-to-prisoner Mail 2009

Download original document:
Brief thumbnail
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
LANSING

JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM
GOVERNOR

DIRECTOR'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2009 - 18
DATE:

September 16, 2009

TO:

Executive Policy Team
Administrative Management Team
Wardens

FROM:

Patricia L. Caruso, Director

SUBJECT:

Prisoner-to-Prisoner Mail

PATRICIA L. CARUSO
DIRECTOR

EFFECTIVE: Immediately

Over the years, there have been on-going concerns with prisoner-to-prisoner correspondence sent
through the mail. These concerns include but are not limited to prisoners using the mail to extort funds
from other prisoners or their families, to operate illegal activities or coordinate disruptive activities
within the Department, to threaten the safety of other prisoners or their family members, to coordinate
gang activity, and to identify prisoners, staff, and others as targets for violence. Current policy
requires that all prisoner-to-prisoner mail be screened to guard against the introduction of such mail,
but this has become increasingly difficult due to the sheer volume of such mail and limited staff
resources.
After careful consideration, I have decided to prohibit all prisoner-to-prisoner correspondence sent
through the mail beginning December 1, 2009, except for the following:
1.

Correspondence between prisoners who are verified to be immediate family members. An
immediate family member is defined as being a spouse, parent, stepparent, grandparent,
mother-in-law, father-in-law, child, step-child, grandchild, sibling, step-sibling, or half-sibling.

2.

Legal correspondence between prisoners who are not represented by legal counsel who are
either:
a.

co-defendants in a verified pending criminal case that has been filed with the court,
including during the appeal period.

b.

co-plaintiffs in a verified pending civil case that has been filed with the court, including
during the appeal period. Plaintiffs in a civil case filed with the court also may
correspond with witnesses in that case, but only during the trial court phase.

Legal correspondence may only be regarding identified issues in the case for which the
prisoners are approved to correspond. The case name and docket number must be identified at
GRANDVIEW PLAZA BUILDING • P.O. BOX 30003 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909
www.michigan.gov • (517) 335-1426

DOM 2009- 18
PAGE 2

the top of all correspondence sent.
Prisoners who meet the criteria set forth above for allowable prisoner-to-prisoner correspondence must
obtain prior approval to correspond with another prisoner. Only prisoners who have received approval
to correspond with another prisoner are permitted to do so. This applies only to prisoners under the
jurisdiction of the Department; prisoners may continue to correspond with prisoners in other federal or
state correctional facilities and with jail inmates in accordance with applicable policies and procedures.
Currently, a parolee may not correspond with a prisoner as a standard condition of parole unless
approval is received from the supervising field agent. A prisoner therefore is prohibited from
corresponding with a parolee absent such approval. If that approval is received, the prisoner may
correspond with the parolee but only in the same manner as allowed for prisoner-to-prisoner
correspondence.
A prisoner who is approved to correspond with another prisoner may have that approval revoked as set
forth in this Director’s Office Memorandum for unauthorized communications, including sending
correspondence on behalf of another prisoner.
Approval Process
A prisoner who meets the criteria for allowable correspondence with another prisoner who wants to
correspond with that prisoner must submit a completed and signed Prisoner-to-Prisoner Mail form
(CSJ-100) to designated housing unit staff to obtain approval prior to corresponding with the prisoner.
The form shall be readily available to prisoners during reception processing and in housing units. If a
prisoner wants to correspond with more than one prisoner, a separate form must be used for each
prisoner.
Designated housing unit staff shall attempt to confirm the prisoner’s eligibility to correspond with the
identified prisoner within five business days after receipt of a completed Prisoner-to-Prisoner Mail
form. This includes confirming the relationship of those identified by the prisoner as being an
immediate family member by reviewing the prisoner's Record Office or Counselor file. For legal
correspondence, the prisoner is required to provide the full docket number of the case on the Prisonerto-Prisoner Mail form; housing unit staff shall verify the status of the case through the local litigation
coordinator, who shall confer with the Office of Legal Affairs. Additional information and/or
documentation may be requested from prisoners as needed to verify eligibility.
The prisoner’s request shall be approved using the Prisoner-to-Prisoner Mail form if it is verified that
the prisoner is eligible to correspond with the identified prisoner. The approval allows for
correspondence between the requesting prisoner and the identified prisoner; the identified prisoner
does not need to also apply. Approved requests shall be entered into OMNI in accordance with
instructions issued by the CFA Deputy Director or designee. If staff are unable to verify the prisoner’s
eligibility, the request shall be denied using the Prisoner-to-Prisoner Mail form and the prisoner
advised that s/he may resubmit the request with acceptable verifying documentation if s/he wants the
request reconsidered. Regardless of whether the request is approved or denied, a copy of the
completed Prisoner-to-Prisoner Mail form shall be placed in the prisoner’s Record Office and
Counselor files with a copy given to the prisoner. If the request is approved, a copy of the form also
shall be sent to the Warden of the institution at which the other prisoner is housed. The Warden shall
ensure that a copy of the form is placed in that prisoner’s Record Office and Counselor files and that a
copy is given to the prisoner.

DOM 2009- 18
PAGE 3

Receipt of Prisoner-to-Prisoner Correspondence through the Mail
Whenever mail is received for a prisoner from another prisoner that is post-marked on or after
December 1, 2009, mailroom staff shall check OMNI to determine if the sending prisoner is approved
to correspond with the intended recipient. If the sending prisoner is not approved, the correspondence
shall not be delivered and may be destroyed without notice to the sender or intended recipient.
If the sending prisoner is approved to correspond with the intended recipient through the mail, the
correspondence shall be read in its entirety to determine if it is otherwise allowed under PD 05.03.118
“Prisoner Mail” and this Director’s Office Memorandum. If the mail is believed to violate
PD 05.03.118 or this Director’s Office Memorandum, including if the mail contains correspondence
from another prisoner, the receiving institution shall issue a Notice of Prisoner-to-Prisoner Mail
Rejection (CSJ-320) to the sending prisoner; the Office of Legal Affairs shall be consulted prior to
issuing the Notice if the prisoners are approved to correspond only regarding criminal or civil
litigation. The Notice and relevant portions of the correspondence shall be sent within a reasonable
period of time to the facility at which the sending prisoner is housed for prompt delivery to the sending
prisoner.
A hearing on the proposed rejection shall be provided to the sending prisoner consistent with hearing
requirements set forth in PD 05.03.118 unless the prisoner waives the hearing. The institution at
which the sending prisoner is housed may restrict that prisoner’s correspondence with others prisoners
who are immediate family members pending the hearing with written notice to the prisoner, but the
hearing shall be held within 14 business days after imposition of the temporary restriction. All
temporary restrictions shall be entered in OMNI; the prisoner being restricted also shall be provided
written notice of the temporary restriction.
If the sending prisoner waives the hearing or the institutional hearing officer upholds the rejection, the
prisoner will no longer be allowed to send correspondence to prisoners who are immediate family
members unless the Warden or designee approves otherwise based on the specific facts of the
rejection; however, the prisoner is allowed to receive correspondence from approved immediate family
members. If the rejected mail was legal correspondence, the Warden or designee shall consult with the
Office of Legal Affairs to determine appropriate action to be taken. The restriction shall be entered in
OMNI and any temporary restriction imposed removed. The sending prisoner also shall be notified of
the restriction in writing with a copy sent to the wardens of the institutions housing prisoners with
whom the sending prisoner had been approved to correspond; the wardens shall ensure that a copy of
the notice is given to the prisoner(s) at their respective institutions.
A prisoner whose approval to send correspondence to other prisoners has been revoked may request
that the approval be reinstated no sooner than one year after the Warden’s determination and, if denied,
at one year intervals thereafter. Approval for reinstatement is subject to approval by the Warden of the
facility at which the prisoner is housed.
Prisoner-to-Prisoner Mail Sent on a Prisoner’s Behalf by a Member of the Public
Mail received for a prisoner from a member of the public that was sent on behalf of another prisoner in
an attempt to circumvent restrictions set forth in this Director’s Office Memorandum is considered a
threat to the security, good order, and discipline of the institution and therefore shall be rejected as set
forth in PD 05.03.118 “Prisoner Mail”. Whenever mail from a member of the public is believed to
have been sent for this purpose, the notice, hearing, and appeal requirements set forth in PD 05.03.118

DOM 2009- 18
PAGE 4

shall be followed. If the prisoner waives his/her right to a hearing in writing or the institutional
hearing officer upholds the rejection, the mail shall be destroyed after the retention period required by
PD 05.03.118.
Implementation
The restriction on prisoner-to-prisoner mail does not take effect until December 1, 2009. To ensure
requests are appropriately screened and approved prior to that date, prisoners may begin submitting
requests to send mail to a family member who also is incarcerated in a Department institution
beginning October 1, 2009. Requests to send legal correspondence to another prisoner may be
submitted beginning November 1, 2009.

PLC: prds

 

 

BCI - 90 Day Campaign - 1 for 1 Match
PLN Subscribe Now Ad 450x450
The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel Side