Skip navigation
The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel - Header

ICE Detention Standards Compliance Audit - Euless City Jail, Euless, TX, ICE, 2009

Download original document:
Brief thumbnail
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
ICE Detention Standards
Compliance Review
. Euless City Jail

April 7-8, 2009
REPORT DATE - Apri19, 2009

reative

correctio ns
I

I

Contract Number: ODT-6-D-OOOI
Order Number: HSCEOP-07-F-01016
b6,b7c

J

, Executive Vice President
Creative Corrections
6415 Calder, Suite B
Beaumont, TX 77706

b6,b7c
, COTR
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Detention Standards Compliance Unit
500 12th St, SW
Washington, DC 20536

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE) .

reative.
corrections

6415 Calder, Suite B • Beaumont, Texas 77706
Making a Difference!

April 9, 2009

MEMORANDUM FOR:

FROM:

James T. Hayes, Jr.
Director
Office of Detention and Removal Operations
b6,b7c

b6,b7c

b6,b7c

Reviewer-In-C

!J'. . . .

Euless City Jail Annual Detention Review

SUBJECT:

.
An Annual Detention Review (ADR) of Euless City Jail was conducted by Creative Corrections
on April 7-8, 2009. The facility has an intergovernmental service agreement with Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The facility houses ICE detainees and city offenders. As
noted on the attached documents, the team of Subject Matter Experts (SME) included b6,b7c
b6,b7c , Food Service;
b6,b7c
, Health Services;
, Environmental Health and
b6,b7c
Safety; and
, Security.
b6,b7c

A closeout meeting was conducted on April 8, 2009, with Chief
deficiencies, concerns, and recommendations were discussed.
I

I
I
I

b6,b7c

during which all

Type of Review
This review is a scheduled Detention Standard Review to determine general compliance with
established ICE National Detention Standards for facilities housing detainees under 72 hours.
The last review of this facility was conducted on April 14-15, 2008.

Review Summary
The Euless City Jail is not accredited by the American Correctional Association, National
.Commission on Correctional Health Care, or the Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE)

1

Standards Compliance
The following statistical information provides a direct comparison of the 2008 ADR and this
ADR conducted for 2009.

April 14-15. 2008 Review

25

Compliant
Deficient
At-Risk
Not Applicable

2

o
1

April 7-8,2009 Review
Compliant
Deficient
At-Risk
Not Applicable

26
1

o
1

Disciplinary Policy - Deficient (Repeat Finding)
Policy: All facilities housing ICE detainees are authorized to impose discipline on detainees
whose behavior is not in compliance with facility rules and reguJations.
•

The Euless City Jail has not established policy or procedures to impose discipline on
detainees whose behavior is not in compliance with facility rules and regulations.

•

ECJ Policy 400.47, Inmate·Discipline, does not establish a written disciplinary procedure.
The policy identifies loss of privileges, disciplinary isolation, and formal charges as
actions allowable by staff; however, the policy does not establish the severity of charges,
duration of sanctions, or proceedings regarding disciplinary reports, investigations, or
hearings. There is no progressive level of review and/or appeals.

•

ECJ is~ues a detainee handbook which describes, in general terms, the disciplinary
process but it does not define charges, or sanctions based on the severity levels of
offenses. Additionally, the facility's discipline policy and procedure does not require
staff compliance with the general procedures described in the handbook.

•

Policy 400.46, Rules of Conduct for PrisonerslDetainees, briefly describes prohibited
acts, but they are not posted in the facility. A disciplinary severity scale and sanctions for
violation of a prohibited act have not been established.

I
I

I

I
I.

.1

Recommendation
The administration should develop a written disciplinary policy that is consistent with the
procedures listed in the ICE Handbook, and should develop a methodology to ensure this
information is made available to all detainees.

2.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE)

Recommended Rating and Justification

It is the Reviewer-In-Charge recommendation that the facility receIve a rating of "Acceptable."
It is also recommended a Plan of Action be required to identify and implement corrective actions
for the deficienc.y noted during tbjs review

RIC Assurance Statement

All findings of this review have been documented on the Detention Review Worksheet and are
supported by the written documentation contained in the review file.

i

3
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE)

Detention Facility Inspection Form
Facilities Used Under 72 hours
Estimated Man-days per Year
6000

Department Of Homeland Security
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
A. TYPE OF FACILITY REVIEWED
ICE Service Processing Center
ICE Contract Detention FacUity
ICE Intergovernmental Service Agreement
~

o
o

G. ACCREDITATION CERTIFICATES
N/A
,. [gI.
....--,
~
·-L-j ._-_.
au ........, v.
" ....

B. CURRENT INSPECTION
'1"'.

.L'T.

o Field Office
:..:£.t'_~1

~ HQ Inspection

Date[s] of Facility Review
April 7-8, 2009

!

J. TOTAL FACILITY POPULATION
Total Facility Intake for Previous 12 months .
9200
Total ICE Man Days for Previous 12 months
i 7787 .
K. CLASSIFICATION LEVEL (lCE SPCS AND CDFs ONLY)

1..-1

L-3

I Adult Female

L. FACILITY CAPACITY
Rated
ODerational
Emergency
Adult Male
74
Adult Female
varies
• [J Facility Holds Juveniles Offenders 16 and Older as Adults
M. AVERAGEDAILYPOPULATION
ICE
10
I AdultMale
I Adult Female
3

i. Name of Team Member//SME
Title / Duty Location
/ Security
b6,b7c

I

1..-2

I Adult Male

1

CDF/IGSA INFORMATJON ONLY
Date of Contract or IGSA
IGSAAlDLS-6060-92
February 23. 1991
Basic Rates per Man-Day
$55.00
Other Charges; (If None, Indicate N/A)
; I8J N/A

I FACILITY HISTORY
Date Built
January, 2002
Date Last Remodeled or Upgraded
N.A.
Date New Construction / Bed Space Added
N.A.
Future Construction Planned
DYes [8j No Date:
Current Bed space
Future ~ed Space (#. New Beds only)
• Number. N.A. Date. N.A. .
75

T

E. ICE Information
I Name of Inspector (Last Name, Title and Duty Station)
b6,b7c
/R
'
• Char2e /
I
eVlewer
m
Name. of Team Member / Title / Duty Location
SME-Food Service /
b6,b7c
! Name of Team Member I Title / Duty Location
i J
/ SME-Medical /
b6,b7c
Name of Team Member I Title I Duty Locadon
b6,b7c
/ SME-Environmental Health and Safety /

l F.

•

.

D. NAME AND LOCATION OF FACILITY
Name
Euless City Jail
Address
1102 West Euless Blvd;
City, State and Zip Code
Euless TX 76040
County
Tarrant
Name and Title of Chief Executive Officer
erintendent
. ( Warden/OIC/Sup
.)
, Asst. Chief
b6,b7c
Telephone Number (Include Area Code)
817-685- b6,b7c
Field Office / Sub-Office (List Office with Oversight)
Dallas
Distance from Field Office
·6.5 miles

! Contract Number

.1.
,-~

H. PROBLEMS / COMPLAINTS (COPIES MUST BE ATTACHED)
..
The FacIlity IS under Court Order or Class ActIon Fmdmg
D Court Order
D Class Action Findin
The Facility has Significant Litigation Pending
Ma'or Liti ation
D Life/Safe Issues
IZJ None

C. PREVIOUSIMOST RECENT FACILITY REVIEW
Date[s] of Last Facility Review
I A ril14-15 2008

i

...

L<'''~

.~

I

I

N. FACILITY STAFFING LEVEL
b2High

USMS

Other

port:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONL Y (LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE)
Form G-324B SIS (Rev. 7/9/07)

SIGNIFICANT INCIDENT SUMMARY WORKSHEET
In order for Creative Corrections to complete its review of your facility, you must complete the following worksheet prior to your
scheduled review dates. This worksheet must contain data for the past twelve months. We wiII use this worksheet in conjunction with
the ICE Detention Standards to assess your detention operations with regard to the needs of ICE and its detainee population. Failure
to complete this worksheet wilI result in a delay in processing this report, and may result in a reduction or removal of ICE detainees
from your facility.

o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Assault:
Offenders on
Offenders!

Assault:
Detainee on
Staff

Number of Forced Moves, inc I.
Forced Cell Moves3

Offender / Detainee Medical
Referrals as a Result of fnjuries
Sustained.

i

I

Escapes
Actual
I

Grievances: .

i

of

I

Psychiatric / Medical Referrals

o

o

o

o

o
o
o
o

o
o
o
o

o
o
o
o

o
o
o
o

o

o

o

o

o

o

2

2

o

o

2
# Psychiatric Cases Referred
for Outside Care

P

IC

o
i

o
o
o
o
o
o
o
v

IC

Deaths

I

o
o
o

o
o
o
o
o
o
o

o
v

# Times Four/Five Point
Restraints Applied/Used

o
o
o

o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

o

o

I

Any attempted physical contact or physical contact that involves two or more offenders
Oral, anal or vaginal penetration or attempted penetration involving at least 2 parties, whether it is consenting or non-consenting
Routine transportation of detainees/offenders is not considered "forced"
Any incident that involves four or more detainees/offenders, includes gang fights, organized mUltiple hunger strikes, work stoppages, hostage situations,
major fires, or other large. scale incidents.
.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE)
Form G~324B SIS (Rev. 7/9/07)

DHS/ICE DETENTION STANDARDS REVIEW SUMMARY REpORT
Z. DEFICIENT

5.
6.
7.
8.

13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.

3. AT-RISK

4. REPEAT

S.NOT

F1NDING

ApPLICABLE

Admission and Release
Classification System
Detainee Handbook
Food Service
Funds and Personal Property
Detainee Grievance Procedures
Issuance and Exchange of Clothing, Bedding, and Towels
Practices

Detention Files
Disciplinary Policy
Emergency Plans
Environmental Health and Safety
Hold Rooms in Detention Facilities
Key and Lock Control
Population Counts
Security Inspections
Special Management Units (Administrative Detention)
Special Management Units (Disciplinary Segregation)
Tool Control
Transportation (Land management)
Use of Force
. Staff / Detainee Communication (Added August 2003)
Detainee Transfer

ALL FINDINGS OF DEFICIENT AND AT-RISK REQUIRE WRITTEN COMMENT DESCRIBING THE FINDING AND
WHAT IS NECESSARY TO REACH COMPLIANC.E •

. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE)
Form G-324B

~IS

(Rev. 7/9/07)

RIC REVIEW ASSURANCE STATEMENT
BY SIGNING BELOW, THE REVIEWER-IN-CHARGE (RIC) CERTIFIES THAT:

1.

2.

ALL FINDINGS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH POLICY OR INADEQUATE CONTROLS, AND FINDINGS OF NOTEWORTHY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS, CONTAINED IN THIS INSPECTION REPORT, ARE SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE THAT IS SUFFICIENT AND
RELIABLE; AND
W'nHlN tHE SCOPE OF lHlS REvIEW, IHE FACILII r IS OPERA lING IN ACCORDANCE WIIH APPLICABLE LAW AND POLICr, AND
PROPERTY AND RESOURCES ARE BEING EFFICIENTLY UTILIZED AND ADEQUATELY SAFEGUARDED, EXCEPT FOR ANY
DEFICIENCIES NOTED IN THE REPORT.

Signature

.

b6,b7c

b6,b7c

Title & Duty Location

Date

Review In Cha e

A i19,2009

5MB-Food Service

b6,b7c

b6,b7c

Print Name, Title, & Duty Location
b6,b7c

SME-Securi

Print Name, Title, & Duty Location

, SME-Environmental Health and Safe

RECOMMENDED RATING:

b6,b7c

b6,b7c

, SME -Medical

b8J ACCEPTABLE
DDEFICIENT
OAT-RISK

COMMENTS:

I

)

j
\
I

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE)
Form G-324B SIS (Rev. 7/9/07)

 

 

The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel Side
Advertise here
Federal Prison Handbook - Side