Doj Bjs Report on Sexual Assault in Prisons 2007-2008
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA) January 2011, NCJ 231172 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Paul Guerino and Allen J. Beck, Ph.D., BJS Statisticians T he Survey of Sexual Violence (SSV) is an annual collection based on official records that the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) has conducted since 2004. It is one of a number of BJS data collections that are conducted to meet the mandates of the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA). On behalf of BJS, staff of the Governments Division of the U.S. Census Bureau mailed survey forms to correctional administrators in the Federal Bureau of Prisons, state prison systems, public and private jails, private prisons, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Administrators were given the option to mail back a completed form or to complete it on the web. Data collection forms can be accessed on the BJS website at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm? ty=dcdetail&iid=406. Each sexual act, as defined by BJS, is classified by the perpetrator who carried out the incident (i.e., inmate or staff) and the type of act perpetrated. Administrators provided counts of the four types of sexual victimization that occurred during the prior calendar year: inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts, inmate-oninmate abusive sexual contacts, staff sexual misconduct, and staff sexual harassment. (See “Defining sexual victimization,” page 2.) For each type of victimization, correctional administrators indicated how many of the allegations were substantiated (determined to have occurred), unsubstantiated, unfounded (insufficient evidence to make a final determination), and still under investigation. The administrators then completed a separate form for each substantiated allegation, providing details about the victim, perpetrator, and circumstances surrounding the incident. Highlights Correctional administrators reported 7,444 allegations of sexual victimization in 2008 and 7,374 allegations in 2007. Total allegations of sexual victimization increased significantly between 2005 (6,241 incidents) and 2008 (7,444). The increase in total allegations of sexual victimization between 2005 and 2008 was largely due to prisons, where allegations increased 21%, from 4,791 incidents to 5,796. In 2008, 931 allegations of sexual victimization (13%) were substantiated, i.e., determined to have occurred upon investigation. State prison administrators reported 589 substantiated incidents of sexual violence in 2008, up 28% from 459 substantiated incidents reported in 2005. About 54% of substantiated incidents of sexual victimization involved only inmates, while 46% of substantiated incidents involved staff with inmates. Female inmates were disproportionately victimized by both other inmates and staff in federal and state prisons, as well as local jails. Approximately 12% of substantiated inmate-on-inmate sexual victimizations were committed by two or more perpetrators. Injuries were reported in about 18% of incidents of inmate-oninmate sexual victimizations and less than 1% of incidents of staff-on-inmate sexual victimizations. The 2007 and 2008 surveys included all federal and state prisons, facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE, and a representative sample of jail jurisdictions and privately operated jails and prisons. The surveys also included jails holding adults in Indian country based on a complete enumeration of jails in 2008 and a representative sample of jails in 2007. In total, data were collected from facilities containing 2.12 million inmates in 2007 and 2.17 million inmates in 2008. (See Methodology for more information about the systems and facilities from which data were collected.) Responses were weighted to provide nationallevel estimates for jails and privately operated facilities. Since the estimates for jails and privately operated facilities are based on a sample rather than a complete enumeration, they are subject to sampling error. (See Methodology for description of sampling procedures.) The 2007-2008 survey results should not be used to rank systems or facilities. Given the absence of uniform reporting, caution is necessary for accurate interpretation of the survey results. Higher or lower counts among facilities may reflect variations in definitions, reporting capacities, and procedures for recording allegations, as opposed to differences in the underlying incidence of sexual victimization. Detailed tabulations of the survey results by system and sampled facility are presented in appendix tables 19-30. Detail on substantiated incidents The 2008 SSV recorded 763 substantiated incidents of sexual victimization, or incidents that were investigated and determined to have occurred. Weighting this total to take into account the sampling of local jail jurisdictions, private prisons, and private jails, the estimated total number of substantiated incidents in the nation in 2008 was 931. The 2007 SSV recorded 783 substantiated incidents of sexual victimization, which when weighted represented 1,001 incidents nationwide. For each substantiated incident reported, correctional administrators were asked to provide details on circumstances surrounding each incident, characteristics of victims and perpetrators, type of pressure or physical force, sanctions imposed, and what type of victim assistance was provided, if any. They provided detail on 97% of reported substantiated incidents. These data are displayed in tables 4–7 and appendix tables 1–18. Defining sexual victimization To define “sexual victimization” under the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003, BJS uses uniform definitions that classify each sexual act by the perpetrator who carried out the incident (i.e., inmate or staff ) and the type of act perpetrated. Staff-on-inmate sexual victimization includes consensual or nonconsensual acts perpetrated on an inmate by an employee, volunteer, contractor, official visitor, or other agency representative. (Family, friends, and other visitors are excluded.) Inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization involves sexual contacts with a victim without his or her consent or with a victim who cannot consent or refuse. The most serious incidents, nonconsensual sexual acts, include— Staff sexual misconduct includes any sexual behavior or act directed toward an inmate by staff, including romantic relationships. Such acts include— contact between the penis and the vagina or the penis and the anus including penetration, however slight; or contact between the mouth and the penis, vagina, or anus; or penetration of the anal or genital opening of another person by a hand, finger, or other object. intentional touching of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks with the intent to abuse, arouse, or gratify sexual desire; or completed, attempted, threatened, or requested sexual acts; or occurrences of indecent exposure, invasion of privacy, or staff voyeurism for sexual gratification. Less serious incidents, abusive sexual contacts, include— intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person; and incidents in which the intention is to sexually exploit rather than Staff sexual harassment includes repeated statements or comments of a sexual nature to an inmate by staff. Such statements include— demeaning references to an inmate’s sex or derogatory comments about his or her body or clothing; or repeated profane or obscene language or gestures. to harm or debilitate. 2 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Summary findings Allegations of sexual victimization The rate of sexual victimization reported by correctional administrators increased from 3.33 incidents per 1,000 inmates in 2005 to 3.82 in 2008. Overall, there were 7,374 allegations of sexual victimization in 2007 and 7,444 allegations in 2008 (table 1). Although there was no significant difference between the overall totals in the 2007 and 2008 collection years, total allegations of sexual victimization increased significantly between 2005 (6,241 allegations) and 2008. This increase was largely the result of increased allegations of sexual victimization in prisons, from 4,791 incidents in 2005 to 5,796 incidents in 2008. The number of allegations of sexual victimization in local and private jails did not increase by a statistically significant amount between 2005 and 2008. The increase in the total number of reported allegations of sexual victimization corresponds with an increase in the rate of reported allegations over time, from 2.83 allegations per 1,000 inmates in 2005 to 3.18 incidents per 1,000 in 2008. As with total allegations, this trend resulted from an increase in the rate of reported allegations in prisons, from 3.33 incidents per 1,000 inmates in 2005 to 3.82 in 2008. The rate of reported allegations of sexual victimization in jails did not increase significantly between 2005 and 2008. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts account for twothirds of the total increase in reported allegations of sexual victimization between 2005 and 2008. The increase in the total number of reported allegations of sexual victimization since 2005 is due to an increase in inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts. Unlike the other three types of victimization, allegations of abusive sexual contact increased significantly over time, from 611 incidents in 2005 to 1,417 in 2008 (table 2). This increase accounted for 67% of the overall increase of 1,203 allegations between 2005 and 2008. January 2011 Table 1 National estimates of total allegations of sexual victimization, by type of facility, 2005-2008 Number of allegations Rate per 1,000 inmates Facility type 2008* 2007 2006 2005 2008* 2007 2006 2005 7,444 7,374 6,528** 6,241** 3.18 2.95 2.91** 2.83** Total 5,796 5,535** 4,958** 4,791** 3.82 3.62** 3.37** 3.33** Prisonsa 368 309** 242** 268** 2.22 1.86** 1.50** 1.71** Public-federalb 5,194 4,940** 4,516** 4,341** 4.20 3.98** 3.75** 3.68** Public-state 1,633 1,823 1,533 1,406 2.04 1.89 2.02 1.86 Jailsc Other adult facilities 2 9** 29 32** ^ 3.33** ^ ^ Indian country jailsd 6 3** 3** 8** 3.34 1.63** 1.62** 3.08** Military-operated 6 4** 5** 4** 0.49 0.61** 0.62** 0.61** ICE-operated *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. ^Too few cases to provide a reliable rate. aIncludes federal, state, and private prisons. bEstimates for 2006 are not comparable to those in 2005 due to a change in reporting. cIncludes local and private jails. dExcludes facilities housing juveniles only. Table 2 National estimates of total allegations of sexual victimization, by type of incident, 2005–2008 Incident type 2008* 2007 2006 7,444 7,374 6,528** Total Inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts 2,343 2,421 2,205 Inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts 1,417 1,220** 834** Staff sexual misconduct 2,528 2,436 2,371 Staff sexual harassment 1,169 1,298 1,118 2005 6,241** 2,160 611** 2,386 1,084** *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Detail may not sum to total due to missing data. BJS Surveys of Sexual Victimization in Correctional Facilities Section 4(a)(1) of the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA) requires the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) to “carry out, for each calendar year, a comprehensive statistical review and analysis of the incidence and effects of prison rape” (P.L. 108-79). BJS has developed a multiple-measure, multiple-mode data collection strategy to fully implement requirements under PREA, including three surveys relating to inmate sexual victimization. The Survey of Sexual Violence (SSV) collects administrative data annually on the incidence of sexual victimization in adult and juvenile correctional facilities. The National Inmate Survey (NIS) and the National Survey of Youth in Custody (NYSYC) gather data on the incidence of sexual assault as reported by inmates in prisons and jails and by youth held in juvenile facilities. 3 Substantiated incidents of sexual victimization State prison administrators reported an increase of 130 substantiated incidents between 2005 and 2008. Administrators of all categories of correctional facilities reported 1,001 substantiated incidents of sexual victimization in 2007 and 931 substantiated incidents in 2008 (table 3). This change in all categories was not statistically significant, nor was the increase in substantiated incidents between 2005 (885 incidents) and 2008. State prisons experienced a 28% increase in substantiated incidents between 2005 (459 incidents) and 2008 (589 incidents). Local and private jails saw no statistically significant change during the same period. The rate of substantiated incidents of sexual violence follows the same pattern as total substantiated incidents. While the overall rate did not change significantly between 2005 and 2008 (for both years, it was 0.4 substantiated incidents per 1,000 inmates), the rate of substantiated incidents in prisons increased from 0.36 incidents per 1,000 inmates in 2005 to 0.43 incidents per 1,000 in 2008. The rate of substantiated incidents in jails did not change significantly between 2005 and 2008. Substantiated incidents of inmateon-inmate abusive sexual contacts and staff sexual harassment increased significantly between 2005 and 2008. Substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts declined from 326 in 2005 to 235 in 2008, but this decline was not statistically significant (table 4). Substantiated incidents of abusive sexual contacts increased significantly between 2005 and 2008, from 173 to 272. The increase in substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct from 338 in 2005 to 361 in 2008 was not significant. Substantiated incidents of staff sexual harassment did increase significantly, from 48 in 2005 to 63 in 2008. Table 3 National estimates of substantiated incidents of sexual victimization and rates per 1,000 inmates, by type of facility 2005–2008 Number of substantiated incidents Rate per 1,000 inmates Facility type 2008* 2007 2006 2005 2008* 2007 2006 2005 Total 931 1,001 967 885 0.40 0.40 0.43 0.40 Prisonsa 651 613 563** 524** 0.43 0.40 0.38** 0.36** Public-federalb 21 14** 5** 41** 0.13 0.08** 0.03** 0.26** Public-state 589 570** 549** 459** 0.47 0.46** 0.46** 0.39** Jailsc 271 380 393 348 0.34 0.39 0.52 0.46 Other adult facilities Indian country jailsd 2 6 7 10 ^ 2.22 ^ ^ Military-operated 5 1** 2** 2** 2.78 0.54** 1.08** 0.77** ICE-operated 1 1 2** 1 0.08 0.15** 0.25** 0.15** *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. ^Too few cases to provide a reliable rate. Note: Detail may not sum to total due to rounding. aIncludes federal, state, and private prisons. bEstimates from 2006 are not comparable to those in 2005 due to a change in reporting. cIncludes local and private jails. dExcludes facilities housing juveniles only. 4 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 A greater percentage of allegations of abusive sexual contacts and incidents of staff sexual misconduct were substantiated in local jails than in prisons. Administrators reported that 19% of alleged abusive sexual contacts were substantiated, as were 12% of alleged nonconsensual sexual acts, 19% of alleged incidents of staff sexual misconduct, and 5% of alleged incidents of staff sexual harassment (table 5). The percentage of substantiated allegations varied by type of facility. Local jail administrators reported substantiating a greater percentage of allegations of abusive sexual contacts (24% in jails versus 17% in prisons). Federal and state prison administrators reported that a greater percentage of allegations of inmateon-inmate sexual victimization were found to be unsubstantiated than local jail administrators. In prisons, 63% of alleged nonconsensual sexual acts and 61% of abusive sexual contacts were unsubstantiated, while 41% of nonconsensual sexual acts and 46% of abusive sexual contacts in jails were unsubstantiated. The same was true of incidents of staff sexual misconduct: 58% of alleged incidents were found to be unsubstantiated in prisons, compared to 39% in local jails. Incident-level findings For each substantiated incident of sexual victimization, administrators were asked to fill out a form that collected incident-level characteristics, such as the age and sex of the victim, the number of perpetrators, any injuries to the victim, the time and location of the victimization, and sanctions imposed on the perpetrator. Table 4 National estimates of total substantiated incidents of sexual victimization, by type of incident, 2005–2008 Incident type 2008* 2007 2006 2005 Total 931 1,001 967 885 Inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts 235 268 262 326 Inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts 272 218** 158** 173** Staff sexual misconduct 361 452 471 338 Staff sexual harassment 63 63 70 48** *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Detail may not sum to total due to rounding. Table 5 National estimates of outcomes of investigations into allegations of sexual violence, by type of facility, 2007-2008 Number of allegations Percent by outcomea All Federal and All Federal and facilitiesb state prisons Local jails facilitiesb state prisons* Local jails Inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts 4,764 3,260 1,291 100% 100% 100% Substantiated 503 304 161 12 11 13 Unsubstantiated 2,416 1,800 504 57 63 41** Unfounded 1,349 739 558 32 26 46** Investigation ongoing 495 417 69 Inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts 2,637 2,012 546 100% 100% 100% Substantiated 490 347 132 19 17 24** Unsubstantiated 1,508 1,209 250 58 61 46** Unfounded 602 429 158 23 22 29 Investigation ongoing 36 27 7 Staff sexual misconduct 4,964 3,461 1,211 100% 100% 100% Substantiated 814 454 285 19 15 25 Unsubstantiated 2,324 1,699 443 53 58 39** Unfounded 1,230 785 416 28 27 36 Investigation ongoing 595 523 67 Staff sexual harassment 2,467 2,078 363 100% 100% 100% Substantiated 126 89 33 5 4 9 Unsubstantiated 1,475 1,222 239 63 62 68 Unfounded 758 671 78 32 34 22 Investigation ongoing 108 96 12 *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Detail may not sum to total due to missing information. aPercents based on allegations for which investigations have been completed. bIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). January 2011 5 Inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization Females were disproportionately victimized by inmates in state and federal prisons and local jails. Females represent 7% of sentenced prison inmates but accounted for 21% of all victims of inmate-oninmate sexual victimization in federal and state prisons1 (table 6). Similarly, females account for 13% of inmates in local jails but 32% of all victims.2 Victims and perpetrators of nonconsensual acts were more likely to be younger than 25, compared to victims and perpetrators of abusive sexual contacts. About 42% of victims of nonconsensual sexual acts and 31% of perpetrators were younger than 25, compared to 33% of victims of abusive sexual contacts and 21% of perpetrators. A greater percentage of perpetrators in local jails were younger than 25 compared to perpetrators in prisons. Perpetrators of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization in local jails were more likely to be under 25 (38%) than perpetrators in prisons (17%). Perpetrators in prisons were more likely than perpetrators in local jails to be ages 25-39 (48% in prisons compared to 39% in local jails) and 40 or older (35% compared to 23%). About 1 in 9 substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization were committed by more than one perpetrator. Approximately 12% of substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization were committed by two or more perpetrators, but this varied by facility and incident type. Two or more perpetrators committed a greater percentage of substantiated incidents in local jails (14%) than in prisons (9%). In addition, two or more perpetrators committed a greater percentage of nonconsensual sexual acts (16%) than abusive sexual contacts (7%). See Prison Inmates at Midyear 2008—Statistical Tables, BJS Web, 8 April 2009. 2 See Jail Inmates at Midyear 2008—Statistical Tables, BJS Web, 31 March 2009. 1 6 About 1 in 5 incidents of inmate-oninmate sexual victimization resulted in a victim injury. Under a fifth (18%) of substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization resulted in an injury. There was no significant difference in the percentage of incidents resulting in an injury in prisons compared to local jails. There was a difference by incident type: nonconsensual sexual acts were significantly more likely to result in an injury (28%) than abusive sexual contacts (8%). Nonconsensual sexual acts were more likely than abusive sexual contacts to occur in the early morning hours (midnight to 6 a.m.). Abusive sexual contacts occurred more often during the day (6 a.m. to 6 p.m.) than nonconsensual sexual acts. About 32% of nonconsensual sexual acts occurred between midnight and 6 a.m., compared to 12% of abusive sexual contacts. Roughly 22% of abusive sexual contacts occurred between 6 a.m. and noon (compared to 17% of nonconsensual sexual acts), and 36% occurred between noon and 6 p.m. (compared to 24% of nonconsensual sexual acts). Solitary confinement was used most often as a sanction against perpetrators of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization. Solitary confinement was the most frequent sanction imposed on perpetrators of inmate-oninmate sexual victimization, but the distribution of sanctions imposed varied by facility and incident type. Perpetrators of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization in local jails were more likely to receive legal action (51%) than were perpetrators in prisons (26%). These legal actions included arrest (22% in jail compared to 3% in prison) and referral for prosecution (34% compared to 25%). Perpetrators of inmate-oninmate sexual victimization were also more likely to be placed in a higher custody level within the facility (33%) in local jails compared to prisons (22%). Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Perpetrators of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization in prisons were more likely than perpetrators in local jails to be placed in solitary confinement (77% in prisons compared to 67% in jails), transferred to another facility (23% compared to 9%), receive a loss of good time or increase in bad time (22% compared to 6%), and confined to their cells (14% compared to 10%). Sanctions were more severe for nonconsensual sexual acts than for abusive sexual contacts. Perpetrators were subject to legal action for 41% of nonconsensual sexual acts, compared to 23% of abusive sexual contacts. They were referred for prosecution for 36% of nonconsensual sexual acts, compared to 17% of abusive sexual contacts. About 32% of nonconsensual sexual Table 6 National estimates of selected characteristics of substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, by type of facility and incident, 2007-2008 Facility type Incident type Characteristic Total percenta Federal and state prisons* Local jails Nonconsensual sexual acts* Abusive sexual contacts Victim characteristics Sex Male 77% 79% 68%** 92% 62%** Female 23 21 32** 8 38** Age Under 25 37% 35% 44% 42% 33%** 25-39 45 46 38 41 48** 40 or older 18 19 18 17 19 Perpetrator characteristics Number of perpetrators 1 88% 91% 86%** 84% 93%** 2 or more 12 9 14** 16 7** Sex Male 82% 81% 80% 93% 70%** Female 18 19 20 7 30** Age Under 25 26% 17% 38%** 31% 21%** 25-39 44 48 39** 41 47** 40 or older 30 35 23** 29 32 Incident characteristics Victim injured No 82% 83% 85% 72% 92%** Yes 18 17 15 28 8** Time of dayb 6 a.m. to noon 20% 22% 15%** 17% 22%** Noon to 6 p.m. 30 34 23** 24 36** 6 p.m. to midnight 42 41 42 44 40 Midnight to 6 a.m. 22 19 29** 32 12** Sanction imposedb Solitary/disciplinary 72% 77% 67%** 69% 76%** Legal actionc 32 26 51** 41 23** Arrested 9 3 22** 10 8 Referred for prosecution 27 25 34** 36 17** Confined to own cell/room 12 14 10** 11 13 Placed in higher custody within same facility 27 22 33** 32 21** Loss of privileges 23 25 22 22 23 Transferred to another facility 22 23 9** 27 17** Loss of good time/increase in bad time 17 22 6** 18 17 Other 14 15 12** 13 15** *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Sex and age are reported for at most two victims in multiple-victim incidents and at most two perpetrators in multiple-perpetrator incidents. Excludes victims with unknown sex or age. aIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). bDetail sums to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for this item. cIncludes “given new sentence.” January 2011 7 acts resulted in the perpetrator being placed in a higher custody level, compared to 21% of abusive sexual contacts, and 27% of the more severe acts resulted in the perpetrator being transferred to another facility, compared to 17% of abusive sexual contacts. as through incriminating photos or notes (15% compared to 8%). Staff-on-inmate sexual victimization The most common location for staff-on-inmate sexual victimization was in a program service area3 (38%), followed by a victim’s cell or room (17%), another area (17%), outside of the facility (12%), in a dormitory (10%), in a common area (10%), and in a staff area (10%). Incidents of staff sexual misconduct were more likely to occur in a staff area (11%) or another area (18%) than incidents of staff sexual harassment (6% and 10%, respectively). Incidents of staff sexual harassment were more likely to occur in a dormitory (14%) or common area (14%) than incidents of staff sexual misconduct (9% for both). Females were disproportionately victimized by staff in state and federal prisons and local jails. Following the same pattern as inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, females account for a greater proportion of victims of staff-on-inmate victimization than they do in the overall inmate population. As previously stated, females account for 7% of sentenced prison inmates, but represent about a third of all victims of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization in federal and state prisons (32%) (table 7). Similarly, females represent only 13% of inmates in local jails but over half of all victims of staff-on-inmate victimization (56%). Females perpetrated the majority of incidents of staff sexual misconduct, while males perpetrated the majority of incidents of staff sexual harassment. About 61% of incidents of staff sexual misconduct and 21% of incidents of staff sexual harassment were perpetrated by females. Males perpetrated 39% of incidents of staff sexual misconduct and over three-quarters of incidents of staff sexual harassment (79%). Over half of incidents of staff sexual harassment were reported by the victim. In over half the incidents of staff sexual harassment (58%), the victim reported the incident to administrators, compared to 26% of the incidents of staff sexual misconduct. Incidents of staff sexual misconduct were more likely than incidents of staff sexual harassment to be reported by an individual other than the victim, including another inmate (23% of staff sexual misconduct compared to 13% of staff sexual harassment), the family of the victim (29% compared to 21%), or a correctional officer or frontline staff (8% compared to 2%). Incidents of staff sexual misconduct were also more likely than incidents of staff sexual harassment to be discovered during an unrelated investigation (4% compared to 2%) or in some other way, such 8 About 2 in 5 incidents of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization occurred in a program service area. More incidents of staff sexual victimization occurred during daytime hours (6 a.m. to 6 p.m.) in federal and state prisons than in jails. More incidents of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization occurred in federal and state prisons either between 6 a.m. and noon (45%) or noon and 6 p.m. (51%) than in local jails (21% and 36%, respectively). More incidents of staff sexual victimization occurred between 6 p.m. and midnight in local jails (51%) than in federal and state prisons (35%). 3Program service areas include the commissary, kitchen, storage area, laundry, cafeteria, workshop, and hallway. To date, BJS has released the following reports on inmate sexual victimization in adult correctional facilities: Sexual Victimization in Prisons and Jails Reported by Inmates, 2008-09 (NCJ 231169) Sexual Victimization in Local Jails Reported by Inmates, 2007 (NCJ 221946) Sexual Victimization in State and Federal Prisons Reported by Inmates, 2007 (NCJ 219414) Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 (NCJ 218914) Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 (NCJ 214646) Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 (NCJ 210333) Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Table 7 National estimates of selected characteristics of substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007-2008 Facility type Incident type Federal and Local Staff sexual Staff sexual Total state prisons* jails misconduct* harassment Characteristic percenta Victim characteristics Sex Male 63% 68% 44%** 65% 50%** Female 37 32 56** 35 50** Perpetrator characteristics Sex Male 44% 39% 63%** 39% 79%** Female 56 61 37** 61 21** Incident characteristics Who reported the incidentb Victim 31% 27% 43%** 26% 58%** Another inmate (non-victim) 22 23 22 23 13** Family of victim 28 31 22 29 21** Correctional officer/frontline staff 7 7 3** 8 2** Anonymous 4 5 4 4 3 Discovered during unrelated investigation 4 2 2 4 2** Other 14 14 12 15 8** Where occurredb In victim’s cell/room 17% 13% 26%** 17% 16% In a dormitory 10 9 11 9 14** In a common area 10 11 10 9 14** In a program service area 38 46 14** 37 41 Outside the facility 12 12 15 13 9 Staff area 10 11 5** 11 6** Other 17 13 28 18 10** Time of dayb 6 a.m. to noon 36% 45% 21%** 36% 38% Noon to 6 p.m. 45 51 36** 45 45 6 p.m. to midnight 40 35 51** 41 29** Midnight to 6 a.m. 23 19 28 24 16 *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Sex and age are reported for at most two victims in multiple-victim incidents and at most two perpetrators in multiple-perpetrator incidents. Excludes victims with unknown sex or age. aIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). bDetail sums to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for this item. January 2011 9 Methodology 2008 survey closed prior to data collection: Sampling The sampling designs for the 2007 and 2008 SSV surveys varied according to the different facilities covered under PREA. The following designs were used: Federal and state prisons In both 2007 and 2008, the survey included the Federal Bureau of Prisons and all 50 state adult prison systems. Prison administrators were directed to report only on incidents of sexual victimization that occurred within publicly operated adult prison facilities and to exclude incidents involving inmates held in local jails, privately operated facilities, and facilities in other jurisdictions. Privately operated state and federal prisons In 2007, a sample of 42 privately operated state and federal prison facilities was drawn to produce a 10% sample of the 417 private prisons identified by the 2005 Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities. Facilities were sorted by average daily population (ADP) in the 12-month period ending June 30, 2005. Five facilities with ADPs greater than 2,145 inmates were selected with certainty because of their size.4 The remaining facilities were sorted by region (i.e., Northeast, Midwest, South, or West), state, and ADP, and 37 facilities were sampled systematically with probability proportional to their size.5 (See “National estimates and accuracy,” page 11.) In 2008, BJS increased the sample from 42 to 85 privately operated prison facilities with the intention of increasing the precision of private prison estimates. As in 2007, facilities were ranked by ADP in the 12-month period ending June 30, 2005. The 33 facilities with an ADP of at least 1,000 inmates were included with certainty in the 2008 SSV. The remaining facilities were sorted by region, state, and ADP, and 52 facilities were sampled systematically with probability proportional to their size. Three privately operated prisons selected for the 4These facilities were given a 100% chance of selection in each sample because of their size. 5The chance of selection was directly related to the size of the facility (i.e., within each stratum, facilities with larger ADPs had a greater chance of selection than facilities with smaller ADPs). 6Six states have combined jail-prison systems: Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, and Vermont. 10 • Pacific Furlough Facility, CA • Horizon Center Community Corrections Center, NY • Community Residential Treatment Services, OH. Public jails In 2007, a sample of 500 publicly operated jail facilities was selected based on data reported in the 2005 Census of Jail Inmates. First, the third-largest jail jurisdiction in 44 states and the District of Columbia was selected.6 This minimized overlap with the 2005 and 2006 studies, in which the largest and second-largest jurisdictions in those states were chosen with certainty. An additional 132 jail jurisdictions with ADPs greater than or equal to 1,000 inmates were also selected with certainty. The remaining 2,745 jail jurisdictions on the frame were then grouped into three strata. The first stratum contained 1,527 jails with an ADP of 79 or fewer inmates, the second stratum included 796 jails with an ADP of 80 to 253 inmates, and the third stratum included 422 jails with an ADP of 254 to 999 inmates. Jail jurisdictions in these three strata were sorted by region, state, and ADP and selected systematically with probability proportional to size, resulting in 72 selections from stratum one, 85 from stratum two, and 165 from stratum three. Of the 500 selected jail jurisdictions, two did not respond to the survey: • Marion-Walthall County Regional Correctional Facility, MS • Desoto County Jail, MS. Three jail jurisdictions selected for the 2007 survey closed prior to data collection: • Haskell County Jail, TX • Galena City Jail, KS • Montevallo City Jail, AL. In 2008, a sample of 500 publicly-operated jail facilities was selected based on data reported in the 2007 Deaths in Custody Annual Summary on Inmates under Jail Supervision. First, the largest jail jurisdiction in 44 states and the District of Columbia was selected to minimize overlap with the 2006 and 2007 studies, in which the second- and third-largest jurisdictions were chosen with certainty, respectively. Another 130 jail jurisdictions with ADPs greater than or equal to 1,000 inmates were selected with certainty. The remaining 2,707 jail jurisdictions on the frame were then grouped into three strata. The first Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 stratum contained 1,483 jails with an ADP of 84 or fewer inmates, the second stratum included 792 jails with an ADP of 85 to 263 inmates, and the third stratum included 432 jails with an ADP of 264 to 999 inmates. As in 2007, jail jurisdictions in these three strata were sorted by region, state, and ADP and selected systematically with probability proportional to their size, resulting in 63 selections from stratum one, 70 from stratum two, and 191 from stratum three. Of the 500 selected jail jurisdictions, 6 did not respond to the survey: • St. Clair County Jail, AL • Welsh City Jail, LA • Anson County Jail, NC • Northumberland County Department of Corrections, PA • Hudspeth County Jail, TX • Marathon County Adult Detention, WI. Two selected jail jurisdictions closed in 2008: • Tyrrell County Jail, NC • Trenton City Jail, MO. Private jails In 2007, a sample of 5 privately operated jails was selected based on data reported in the 2005 Census of Jail Inmates. The 42 private facilities on the sampling frame were sorted by region, state, and ADP, and 5 jails were systematically sampled with probability proportional to size. In 2008, a sample of 5 privately operated jails was selected based on data reported in the 2007 Deaths in Custody Annual Summary on Inmates under Jail Supervision. Like 2007, the 41 private facilities on the sampling frame were sorted by region, state, and ADP, and 5 jails were systematically sampled with probability proportional to size. Other correctional facilities Three additional censuses of other correctional facilities were drawn to represent— • all adult jails in Indian country in 20077 • all facilities operated by the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Marines in the continental United States • all facilities operated by ICE. 7A sample of 15 of the 63 adult jails in Indian country was taken in 2008 rather than a census. January 2011 Of the 66 other correctional facilities surveyed in 2007, seven did not respond to the survey: • Fort Peck Police Department and Adult Detention, MT • Standing Rock Law Enforcement and Adult Detention, ND • Turtle Mountain Law Enforcement and Adult Detention, ND • Laguna Tribal Police and Detention Center, NM • Eastern Nevada Law Enforcement and Adult Detention, NV • Sisseton-Wahpeton Law Enforcement and Adult Detention, SD • ICE—Port Isabel Service Processing Center, TX. Five of the 74 other correctional facilities surveyed in 2008 did not respond to the survey: • Navajo Department of Corrections, Tuba City, AZ • ICE—Krome Service Processing Center, FL • ICE—LaSalle Detention Facility, LA • Blackfeet Adult Detention Center, MT • ICE—Aguadilla Service Processing Center, Puerto Rico. Two other correctional facilities sampled for the 2007 survey closed prior to data collection: • ICE—San Pedro Processing Center, CA • Pine Ridge Police Department and Adult Detention, SD. One other correctional facility sampled for the 2008 survey closed prior to data collection: • ICE—San Pedro Processing Center, CA. Data for each correctional system and sampled facility are displayed in appendix tables 19-30. In each table, a measure of population size has been included to provide a basis for comparing victimization counts. Reports of sexual victimization Since BJS first developed uniform definitions of sexual victimization, correctional administrators have significantly enhanced their abilities to report uniform data on sexual victimization. In 2008, administrators in 46 state prison systems were able to report incidents of abusive sexual contacts separately from nonconsensual sexual acts. This was an increase of 4 systems since 2006. One state limited counts of nonconsensual sexual acts to substantiated incidents, and one state limited counts of nonconsensual sexual acts to completed (versus attempted and completed) acts. The majority of state prison systems were able to report data on staff sexual misconduct using survey definitions. Three systems were unable to separate 11 staff sexual harassment from misconduct, and one system did not track incidents of staff sexual harassment in a central database. Public jail administrators were less likely than prison administrators to report sexual victimization based on the definitions provided. About a quarter of public jail jurisdictions did not record abusive sexual contacts separately from the more serious nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008. This is an improvement over the 2006 SSV, in which a third of public jail jurisdictions did not record this information. Ten public jail jurisdictions did not record allegations of abusive sexual contacts, 12 based counts of nonconsensual sexual acts on completed acts only, and 15 based counts of nonconsensual sexual acts on substantiated allegations only. Finally, 5 public jail jurisdictions did not keep records on allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts. by treating each facility-level sample as its own stratum (or multiple strata in the case of the public jail sample), for a total of 10 strata in 2007 and 10 strata in 2008. The 2007 and 2008 incident report data files were combined and treated as one data file. The sampling information for each year was retained by treating each facility-level sample as its own stratum (or multiple strata in the case of the public jail samples), for a total of 19 strata across both years. A finite population correction was utilized for both summary- and incident-level estimation. Published estimates are not adjusted to account for systems and facilities that were unable to meet BJS reporting standards. However, these systems and facilities are footnoted in appendix tables 19-30. Estimates of the standard errors are included in appendix tables 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18. These standard errors may be used to construct confidence intervals around survey estimates (e.g., numbers, rates, and percentages), as well as differences between these estimates. For example, the 95% confidence interval around the percentage of male victims of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization is approximately 77% plus or minus 1.96 times 1.2% resulting in a 95% confidence interval of 74.6% to 79.4%. National estimates and accuracy Tests of statistical significance Survey responses were weighted to produce national estimates by type of correctional facility. Data from the Federal Bureau of Prisons, all state systems, 2008 jails in Indian country, military facilities, and ICE facilities received a weight of 1.00, since these systems and facilities were all selected with certainty. To facilitate the analysis, rather than provide the detailed estimates for every standard error, differences in the estimates of sexual victimization for subgroups in these tables have been tested for significance at the 95% level of confidence. For example, the difference in the total number of incidents of sexual victimization in 2005 (6,241 incidents) compared to 2008 (7,444), is statistically significant at the 95% level of confidence (table 1). In all tables providing detailed comparisons, statistical differences at the 95% level of confidence have been designated with two asterisks (**). The comparison group has been designated with one asterisk (*). Among public jails, private jails, private prisons, and 2007 jails in Indian country, facilities were assigned a weight equal to the inverse of their probability of selection. Estimates for responding public jail jurisdictions were adjusted for nonresponse by multiplying each estimate by the ratio of the total ADP in all jurisdictions within the jail’s sampling stratum to the ADP among participating jurisdictions within the jail’s sampling stratum. Survey estimates for public jails, private jails, and private prisons are subject to sampling error. The estimated sampling error varies by the size of the estimate and the size of the base population. Estimated standard errors were calculated using SUDAAN.8 For summary statistics, the 2007 and 2008 data files were treated separately. For each file, the sampling information was retained Appendix tables Appendix tables 1-6 have more detailed information on characteristics of inmate-oninmate incidents. Characteristics of staff-oninmate sexual victimization are described in table 5 and appendix tables 7-18. Detailed tabulations of the survey results by system and sampled facility are presented in appendix tables 19–30. All appendix tables are available on the BJS website at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/ pdf/svraca0708.pdf. 8See Research Triangle Institute (2008). SUDAAN Language Manual Release 10.0. Research Triangle Park, NC. 12 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 1 National estimates of the characteristics of victims and perpetrators in substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Facility type Incident type Federal and Nonconsensual Abusive sexual state prisons* Local jails sexual acts* contacts Characteristic Total percenta Victim characteristics Number of victims 1 96% 96% 97%** 97% 95%** 2 or more 4 4 3** 3 5** Sex Male 77% 79% 68%** 92% 62%** Female 23 21 32** 8 38** Age Under 25 37% 35% 44% 42% 33%** 25-39 45 46 38 41 48** 40 or older 18 19 18 17 19 Race/Hispanic origin White, Non-Hispanic 73% 75% 69% 73% 73% Black, Non-Hispanic 17 17 17 15 18 Hispanic 8 5 14** 8 8 Other, Non-Hispanicb 3 3 1** 3 2** Perpetrator characteristics Number of perpetrators 1 88% 91% 86%** 84% 93%** 2 or more 12 9 14** 16 7** Sex Male 82% 81% 80% 93% 70%** Female 18 19 20 7 30** Age Under 25 26% 17% 38%** 31% 21%** 25-39 44 48 39** 41 47** 40 or older 30 35 23** 29 32 Race/Hispanic origin White, Non-Hispanic 42% 46% 33%** 39% 46% Black, Non-Hispanic 45 44 47 47 44 Hispanic 9 6 16** 9 8 Other, Non-Hispanicb 4 4 4 5 3** *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Sex, age, and race/Hispanic origin are reported for at most two victims in multiple-victim incidents and at most two perpetrators in multiple-perpetrator incidents. Excludes victims with unknown sex, age, race, or Hispanic origin. aIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). bIncludes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. January 2011 13 Appendix Table 2 Standard errors for appendix table 1: National estimates of the characteristics of victims and perpetrators in substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Incident type Nonconsensual Abusive sexual Characteristic Total percent Local jails sexual acts contacts Victim characteristics Number of victims 1 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 2 or more 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 Sex Male 1.2% 4.2% 0.7% 1.7% Female 1.2 4.2 0.7 1.7 Age Under 25 1.4% 4.5% 2.5% 1.3% 25-39 1.5 4.4 2.8 1.5 40 or older 1.2 4.1 1.1 1.9 Race/Hispanic origin White, non-Hispanic 1.0% 3.0% 1.5% 1.2% Black, non-Hispanic 0.7 2.4 1.0 1.0 Hispanic 0.5 1.6 0.8 0.7 Other, non-Hispanic 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 Perpetrator characteristics Number of perpetrators 1 1.5% 2.1% 2.9% 0.7% 2 or more 1.5 2.1 2.9 0.7 Sex Male 0.7% 2.2% 0.7% 1.3% Female 0.7 2.2 0.7 1.3 Age Under 25 2.0% 4.7% 3.3% 1.1% 25-39 1.2 2.7 2.1 1.6 40 or older 1.4 4.2 1.5 1.8 Race/Hispanic origin White, Non-Hispanic 1.8% 4.6% 2.8% 1.5% Black, Non-Hispanic 1.8 4.7 2.7 1.7 Hispanic 0.5 1.7 0.8 0.8 Other, Non-Hispanic 0.2 0.9 0.5 0.1 Note: All facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and state prison systems were included in the survey and therefore do not have standard errors. 14 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 3 National estimates of the circumstances surrounding substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Facility type Incident type Federal and Nonconsensual Abusive Circumstance Total percenta state prisons* Local jails sexual acts* sexual contacts Type of pressure or forceb None 31% 33% 32% 14% 48%** Force/threat of forcec 46 43 47 66 26** Persuasion or talked into it 15 17 10** 20 9** 21 20 23 20 21 Otherd Victim injured No 82% 83% 85% 72% 92%** Yes 18 17 15 28 8** Where occurredb In victim’s cell/room 47% 49% 42%** 57% 37%** In a dormitory 12 10 19 11 13 In a common area 23 23 26 16 29** In a program service area 10 11 8 4 16** Other arease 15 13 14 17 13 Time of dayb 6 a.m. to noon 20% 22% 15%** 17% 22%** Noon to 6 p.m. 30 34 23** 24 36** 6 p.m. to midnight 42 41 42 44 40 Midnight to 6 a.m. 22 19 29** 32 12** Who reported the incidentb Victim 70% 66% 77%** 71% 68% Another inmate 13 13 12 14 11 Correctional officer 21 23 16** 19 22 Otherf 7 6 9 7 6 *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. aIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). bDetail sums to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for this item. cIncludes “threatened with physical harm,”“physically held down or restrained in some way,”“physically harmed or injured,” and “threatened with a weapon.” dIncludes “bribery or blackmail,”“gave victim drugs or alcohol,”“offered protection from other inmates,” and “other.” eIncludes “in the perpetrator’s cell/room,”“in a temporary holding cell within the facility,”“outside the facility,”“while in transit,” and “other.” fIncludes “family of victim,”“administrative staff, “medical/healthcare staff,”“instructor/teacher,”“counselor,”“chaplain or other religious official,” and “other.” January 2011 15 Appendix Table 4 Standard errors for appendix table 3: National estimates of the circumstances surrounding substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Incident type Nonconsensual Abusive Circumstance Total percent Local jails sexual acts sexual contacts Type of pressure or force None 1.4% 4.6% 1.1% 1.7% Force/threat of force 1.6 4.8 2.5 1.2 Persuasion or talked into it 0.5 1.5 1.2 0.4 Other 1.4 4.9 2.5 1.1 Victim injured No 1.5% 1.9% 2.7% 0.5% Yes 1.5 1.9 2.7 0.5 Where occurred In victim’s cell/room 1.3% 3.4% 2.8% 1.4% In a dormitory 1.3 4.5 2.4 1.0 In a common area 1.3 4.6 2.4 1.2 In a program service area 1.1 4.1 0.2 2.0 Other areas 1.5 1.9 2.9 0.9 Time of day 6 a.m. to noon 0.8% 2.5% 1.2% 1.2% Noon to 6 p.m. 1.0 2.7 1.5 1.4 6 p.m. to midnight 1.7 5.0 3.0 1.8 Midnight to 6 a.m. 1.5 5.0 2.6 0.9 Who reported the incident Victim 1.0% 2.6% 1.6% 1.3% Another inmate 0.7 2.1 1.1 0.9 Correctional officer 0.8 2.0 1.4 1.0 Other 0.5 1.9 0.7 0.8 Note: All facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and state prison systems were included in the survey and therefore do not have standard errors. 16 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 5 National estimates of the sanctions imposed on perpetrators of substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Facility type Incident type Federal and Nonconsensual Abusive Sanction Total percenta state prisons* Local jails sexual acts* sexual contacts Solitary/disciplinary 72% 77% 67%** 69% 76%** 32 26 51** 41 23** Legal actionb Arrested 9 3 22** 10 8 Referred for prosecution 27 25 34** 36 17** Confined to own cell/room 12 14 10** 11 13 Placed in higher custody within same facility 27 22 33** 32 21** Loss of privileges 23 25 22 22 23 Transferred to another facility 22 23 9** 27 17** Loss of good time/increase in bad time 17 22 6** 18 17 Otherc 14 15 12** 13 15** *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Detail sums to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for this item. a Includes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). bIncludes “given new sentence.” cIncludes “given extra work” and “other.” Appendix Table 6 Standard errors for appendix table 5: National estimates of the sanctions imposed on perpetrators of substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Incident type Nonconsensual Abusive Sanction Total percent Local jails sexual acts sexual contacts Solitary/disciplinary 1.9% 4.4% 3.4% 1.0% Legal action 1.5 4.5 2.6 2.0 Arrested 1.2 4.3 1.1 2.2 Referred for prosecution 1.4 4.3 2.5 1.0 Confined to own cell/room 0.6 1.8 0.8 0.9 Placed in higher custody within same facility 1.6 2.0 3.1 1.9 Loss of privileges 1.3 4.3 2.2 1.1 Transferred to another facility 1.9 3.9 2.9 1.9 Loss of good time/increase in bad time 0.6 1.1 1.2 0.4 Other 0.4 1.1 0.9 0.4 Note: All facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and state prison systems were included in the survey and therefore do not have standard errors. January 2011 17 Appendix Table 7 National estimates of the characteristics of substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Facility type Federal and state prisons* Local jails Characteristic Total percenta Nature of the incidentb Sexual relationship that “appeared to be willing” 62% 68% 45%** Sexual harassment or repeated verbal statements of a sexual nature 18 19 20 Unwanted touching 8 7 9 Indecent exposure, invasion of privacy, or voyeurism for sexual gratification 4 3 5 Pressure or abuse of power resulting in a nonconsensual act 6 7 5 Physical force resulting in a sexual act 1 1 2** Other 10 7 19** Unknown level of coercion 3 3 3 Number of staff involved 1 96% 98% 95% 2 or more 4 2 5 Number of victims 1 91% 92% 91% 2 or more 9 8 9 *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. aIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). bDetail sums to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for this item. Appendix Table 8 Standard errors for appendix table 7: National estimates of the characteristics of substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident , 2007–2008 Characteristic Total percent Local jails Nature of the incident Sexual relationship that “appeared to be willing” 2.7% 7.8% Sexual harassment or repeated verbal statements of a sexual nature 2.2 7.1 Unwanted touching 1.3 4.3 Indecent exposure, invasion of privacy or voyeurism for sexual gratification 0.6 1.6 Pressure or abuse of power resulting in a nonconsensual act 0.4 1.1 Physical force resulting in a sexual act ^ 0.2 Other 1.6 5.7 Unknown level of coercion 0.4 1.2 Number of staff involved 1 1.3% 2.0% 2 or more 1.3 2.0 Number of victims 1 1.2% 1.9% 2 or more 1.2 1.9 ^Less than 0.05. Note: All facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and state prison systems were included in the survey and therefore do not have standard errors. 18 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 9 National estimates of circumstances surrounding substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Facility type Incident type Circumstance Total percenta Federal and state prisons* Local jails Staff sexual misconduct* Staff sexual harassment Who reported the incident Victim 31% 27% 43%** 26% 58%** Another inmate (non-victim) 22 23 22 23 13** Family of victim 28 31 22 29 21** Correctional officer/front line staff 7 7 3** 8 2** Anonymous 4 5 4 4 3 Discovered during unrelated investigation 4 2 2 4 2** Other 14 14 12 15 8** Where occurred In victim’s cell/room 17% 13% 26%** 17% 16% In a dormitory 10 9 11 9 14** In a common area 10 11 10 9 14** In a program service area 38 46 14** 37 41 Outside the facility 12 12 15 13 9 Staff area 10 11 5** 11 6** Other 17 13 28 18 10** Time of day 6 a.m. to noon 36% 45% 21%** 36% 38% Noon to 6 p.m. 45 51 36** 45 45 6 p.m. to midnight 40 35 51** 41 29** Midnight to 6 a.m. 23 19 28 24 16 *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Detail sums to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. aIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Appendix Table 10 Standard errors for appendix table 9: National estimates of the circumstances surrounding substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Incident type Staff sexual Staff sexual Circumstance Total percent Local jails misconduct harassment Who reported the incident Victim 2.7% 7.7% 3.2% 2.6% Another inmate (non-victim) 1.8 5.8 2.0 1.9 Family of victim 2.0 6.0 2.3 2.0 Correctional officer/front line staff 1.2 0.9 1.4 0.1 Anonymous 0.5 1.8 0.5 2.0 Discovered during unrelated investigation 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.1 Other 1.7 4.1 1.9 1.3 Where occurred In victim’s cell/room 1.8% 6.2% 2.1% 1.9% In a dormitory 1.4 4.5 1.6 1.3 In a common area 1.3 4.4 1.5 1.7 In a program service area 1.7 2.4 1.9 2.2 Outside the facility 1.4 4.6 1.5 2.6 Staff area 0.8 1.5 0.9 0.3 Other 2.7 8.3 3.1 1.9 Time of day 6 a.m. to noon 1.4% 3.4% 1.6% 2.1% Noon to 6 p.m. 1.8 5.8 2.1 2.7 6 p.m. to midnight 2.2 6.8 2.5 2.7 Midnight to 6 a.m. 2.2 6.7 2.6 2.8 Note: All facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and state prison systems were included in the survey and therefore do not have standard errors. January 2011 19 Appendix Table 11 National estimates of the characteristics of victims of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Facility type Incident type Federal and Staff sexual Staff sexual Characteristic Total percenta state prisons* Local jails misconduct* harassment Sex Male 63% 68% 44%** 65% 50%** Female 37 32 56** 35 50** Age Under 18 ^% ^% 0%** ^% 0%** 18-24 19 13 29** 20 19 25-29 26 24 30 27 24 30-34 25 24 27 27 16** 35-39 16 20 8** 15 21** 40-44 9 12 4** 8 14** 45 or older 4 5 2** 3 7** Race/Hispanic originb White, non-Hispanic 55% 55% 68%** 53% 63%** Black, non-Hispanic 33 34 27 35 26** Hispanic 10 8 8 11 8 3 3 1** 3 3 Otherc *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. ^Less than 0.5. Note: Sex, age, and race/Hispanic origin are reported for at most two victims in multiple-victim incidents. Excludes victims with unknown sex, age, and/or race/ Hispanic origin. aIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). bDetail sums to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for this item. cIncludes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. Appendix Table 12 Standard errors for appendix table 11: National estimates of the characteristics of victims of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Incident type Characteristic Total percent Local jails Staff sexual misconduct Staff sexual harassment Sex Male 2.4% 7.0% 2.8% 2.3% Female 2.4 7.0 2.8 2.3 Age Under 18 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 18-24 2.5 7.5 2.9 2.5 25-29 1.9 5.8 2.2 2.1 30-34 2.1 6.6 2.5 0.9 35-39 0.8 1.6 0.9 1.8 40-44 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.6 45 or older 0.3 0.8 0.2 1.5 Race/Hispanic origin White, non-Hispanic 2.0% 5.2% 2.4% 1.9% Black, non-Hispanic 1.8 4.8 2.1 1.2 Hispanic 1.1 1.9 1.3 1.8 Other 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 Note: All facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and state prison systems were included in the survey and therefore do not have standard errors. 20 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 13 National estimates of the characteristics of staff involved in staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007-2008 Facility type Incident type Federal and Staff sexual Staff sexual Characteristic Total percenta state prisons* Local jails misconduct* harassment Sex Male 44% 39% 63%** 39% 79%** Female 56 61 37** 61 21** Age 24 or younger 8% 6% 7% 8% 3%** 25-29 19 17 25 20 13** 30-34 15 17 10** 15 15 35-39 18 17 23 18 17 40-44 14 14 12 15 10** 45-54 21 21 22 19 28** 55 or older 5 7 2** 4 13** Race/Hispanic origin White, non-Hispanic 63% 68% 55% 62% 69% Black, non-Hispanic 24 20 29 26 13** Hispanic 9 6 16 9 12 4 6 0** 3 6** Otherb *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Sex, age, and race/Hispanic origin are reported for at most two perpetrators in multiple-perpetrator incidents. Excludes perpetrators with unknown sex, age, and/ or race/Hispanic origin. aIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). bIncludes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. Appendix Table 14 Standard errors for appendix table 13: National estimates of the characteristics of staff involved in staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Incident type Characteristic Total percent Local jails Staff sexual misconduct Staff sexual harassment Sex Male 2.4% 6.4% 2.9% 2.1% Female 2.4 6.4 2.9 2.1 Age 24 or younger 1.4% 4.0% 1.6% 0.2% 25-29 2.1 6.1 2.5 2.6 30-34 1.4 2.3 1.6 2.0 35-39 1.3 4.4 1.5 1.7 40-44 1.8 4.1 2.1 0.5 45-54 2.4 7.8 2.8 3.1 55 or older 0.2 0.4 0.2 1.0 Race/Hispanic origin White, non-Hispanic 2.7% 7.8% 3.1% 2.8% Black, non-Hispanic 2.3 6.6 2.7 0.7 Hispanic 2.3 7.2 2.7 3.1 Other 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 Note: All facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and state prison systems were included in the survey and therefore do not have standard errors. January 2011 21 Appendix Table 15 National estimates of the type and position of staff involved in staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Facility type Incident type Federal and Staff sexual Staff sexual Characteristic Total percenta state prisons* Local jails misconduct* harassment Type of staff involved Full/part-time employee 86% 83% 93%** 86% 87% Contract employee/vendor 13 16 5** 13 9** Volunteer/intern 1 1 1 ^ 3 Other 2 1 1 2 2 Position of staff involved Administrator 2% 1% 5% 2% 4% Correctional officer 65 55 82** 66 61 Clerical 2 3 2 3 0** Maintenance or other facility support 13 17 6** 13 18** Medical or other health care 10 12 4** 10 7** Education staff 3 4 0** 2 4** Other program staff 3 5 1** 3 5** Other 4 5 3** 3 9** *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. ^Less than 0.5. Note: Detail sums to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. aIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE). Appendix Table 16 Standard errors for appendix table 15: National estimates of the type and position of staff involved in staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Incident type Characteristic Total percent Local jails Staff sexual misconduct Staff sexual harassment Type of staff involved Full/part-time employee 0.7% 1.4% 0.7% 2.4% Contract employee/vendor 0.6 1.0 0.7 1.7 Volunteer/intern 0.3 1.0 0.0 2.0 Other 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Position of staff involved Administrator 1.1% 3.8% 1.3% 1.7% Correctional officer 1.8 4.5 2.0 2.4 Clerical 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.0 Maintenance or other facility support 0.6 1.4 0.6 1.7 Medical or other health care 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.4 Education staff 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 Other program staff 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 Other 0.3 1.0 0.1 1.9 Note: All facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and state prison systems were included in the survey and therefore do not have standard errors. 22 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 17 National estimates of the impact on inmate and staff in substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Facility type Incident type Impact Total percenta Federal and state prisons* Local jails Staff sexual misconduct* Staff sexual harassment Victim injured No 100% 99% 100%** 100% 99%** Yes ^ 1 0** ^ 1** Medical follow-up for victimb Given medical examination 10% 11% 4%** 12% 1%** Administered rape kit 1 2 ^** 2 0** Tested for HIV/AIDS 2 3 2 3 0** Tested for other STDs 2 3 2 3 0** Provided counseling or mental health treatment 15 20 5** 17 5** None of the above 80 74 94** 77 95** Change in housing/custody for victimb Placed in administrative segregation or protective custody 25% 24% 14%** 28% 4%** Placed in medical unit, ward, or hospital 1 1 1 1 0** Confined to own cell/room 2 1 ^** 2 0** Given higher level of custody in facility 2 2 0** 2 0** Transferred to another facility 19 20 22 22 3** Other 10 14 6** 10 9** None of the above 51 49 65** 46 85** Sanction imposed on staffb Legal action 45% 44% 42% 51% 9%** Arrested 20 13 30** 23 2** Referred for prosecution 37 41 31 42 7** Convicted/charged/indicted 3 3 2 3 0** Loss of job 79 78 88** 85 44** Discharged 37 31 50** 40 23** Staff resigned (prior to investigation) 30 34 28 32 16** Staff resigned (after investigation) 13 15 10 14 6** Other sanction 21 26 14** 15 60** Reprimanded/disciplined 12 12 13 6 43** 12 17 4** 10 24** Otherc *Comparison group. **Difference with comparison group is significant at the 95% confidence level. ^Less than 0.5. aIncludes private prisons and jails, jails in Indian country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE). bDetail sums to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed. cIncludes “demoted/diminished responsibilities,”“transferred to another facility,” and “other.” January 2011 23 Appendix Table 18 Standard errors for appendix table 17: National estimates of the impact on inmate and staff in substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility and incident, 2007–2008 Incident type Staff sexual Staff sexual Impact Total percent Local jails misconduct harassment Victim injured No ^% 0.0% ^% ^% Yes ^ 0.0 ^ ^ Medical follow-up for victim Given medical examination 1.2% 1.0% 1.4% 0.0% Administered rape kit 0.1 ^ 0.1 0.0 Tested for HIV/AIDS 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.0 Tested for other STDs 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.0 Provided counseling or mental health treatment 0.6 1.0 0.8 1.3 None of the above 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.2 Change in housing/custody for victim Placed in administrative segregation or protective custody 1.9% 5.0% 2.1% 0.2% Placed in medical unit, ward, or hospital ^ 0.1 ^ 0.0 Confined to own cell/room 0.4 ^ 0.4 0.0 Given higher level of custody in facility 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Transferred to another facility 2.0 6.7 2.4 0.2 Other 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4 None of the above 2.3 6.9 2.7 0.7 Sanction imposed on staff Legal action 2.5% 7.6% 2.9% 0.4% Arrested 2.5 7.2 2.9 0.1 Referred for prosecution 2.3 7.2 2.8 0.4 Convicted/charged/indicted 0.3 0.9 0.4 0.0 Loss of job 1.5 2.4 1.8 2.6 Discharged 2.7 7.9 3.0 2.8 Staff resigned (prior to investigation) 2.2 6.9 2.5 1.9 Staff resigned (after investigation) 1.3 4.0 1.5 0.3 Other sanction 1.4 4.6 1.6 2.7 Reprimanded/disciplined 1.4 4.6 1.6 2.4 Other 0.5 0.9 0.5 1.5 ^Less than 0.5. Note: All facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and state prison systems were included in the survey and therefore do not have standard errors. 24 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 19 Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by federal and state prison authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007–2008 2008 2007 Reported Reported Reported Reported inmate-on-inmate inmate-on-inmate inmate-on-inmate inmate-on-inmate Prisoners in nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts custody, 6/30/2008a Jurisdiction Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Total 1,405,074 1,577 136 1,105 193 1,683 168 907 154 Federal 165,690 74 1 30 2 19 0 9 0 State Alabamab 24,861 47 1 4 0 11 0 / / 3,796 0 0 / / 0 0 / / Alaskab,c Arizona 31,345 58 1 19 1 63 0 26 1 Arkansas 13,235 5 2 11 5 13 5 10 4 California 169,532 113 4 31 7 117 6 12 2 Colorado 17,720 31 7 13 2 50 13 34 6 Connecticut 20,590 27 2 22 0 22 2 16 0 Delaware 7,200 1 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 Florida 89,102 148 0 31 0 171 0 31 0 Georgiab,c 48,870 68 0 / / 70 1 / / Hawaiic 3,398 6 1 / / 1 1 0 0 Idaho 5,387 2 2 3 2 1 1 5 5 Illinois 45,548 17 2 2 0 29 2 7 1 Indiana 23,762 25 2 13 0 19 1 11 1 Iowa 8,740 26 7 58 16 31 10 58 16 Kansas 8,653 31 1 21 3 28 1 18 2 Kentucky 12,846 15 5 7 1 10 3 6 0 Louisiana 20,929 39 8 14 1 21 1 4 0 Maine 2,163 1 1 4 4 1 0 5 4 Marylandc 22,956 21 1 / / 17 1 0 0 Massachusetts 11,346 23 12 32 16 18 8 21 5 Michigand 50,482 22 7 30 18 21 3 29 22 Minnesota 7,820 23 1 2 0 17 0 9 2 Mississippib,e 12,899 5 0 0 0 7 0 / / Missouri 30,004 45 2 11 2 37 3 14 5 Montana 1,629 36 4 8 6 18 6 5 1 Nebraska 4,478 5 0 9 4 5 1 10 2 Nevada 13,006 16 1 15 3 34 0 10 0 New Hampshireb 2,890 7 0 2 0 29 0 / / New Jersey 22,605 5 0 8 1 13 1 2 0 New Mexico 3,446 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 New York 62,019 23 1 18 3 37 6 24 7 North Carolina 39,326 58 5 35 7 38 13 47 3 North Dakota 1,425 0 0 3 1 3 1 3 3 Ohio 48,230 64 16 22 9 67 12 25 15 Oklahoma 18,034 28 0 9 2 46 3 1 0 Oregon 13,499 17 0 7 2 20 4 2 0 Pennsylvania 44,957 33 8 23 4 42 6 9 2 Rhode Island 3,890 6 2 8 7 3 0 7 4 South Carolinaf 24,492 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 South Dakota 3,320 5 0 4 1 5 1 7 2 Tennessee 14,357 20 0 9 4 35 3 6 1 Texas 140,054 210 2 416 4 261 3 327 3 Utah 5,153 15 3 24 3 8 3 27 0 Vermont 1,579 20 7 39 29 20 6 27 17 January 2011 25 Appendix Table 19 (continued) Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by federal and state prison authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007–2008 2008 2007 Reported Reported Reported Reported inmate-on-inmate inmate-on-inmate inmate-on-inmate inmate-on-inmate Prisoners nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts in custody, 6/30/2008a Jurisdiction Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated State (continued) Virginia 32,195 38 2 15 4 25 3 1 1 Washington 17,055 45 10 17 4 110 22 14 6 West Virginia 4,959 2 1 7 4 2 2 0 0 Wisconsin 22,378 36 0 43 10 51 5 23 9 Wyoming 1,224 9 2 4 0 13 5 3 2 /Not reported. aExcludes inmates in privately-operated facilities and facilities operated and administered by local governments. Counts were based on National Prisoners Statistics (NPS-1A), 2008. bAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007. cAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008. dCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts limited to completed acts only in 2008. eCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts limited to completed acts only in 2007. fCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts limited to substantiated incidents only in 2007 and 2008. 26 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 20 Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by federal and state prison authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007–2008 2008 2007 Reported allegations of staff sexual Reported allegations of staff Reported allegations of staff sexual Reported allegations of staff misconduct with inmates sexual harassment of inmates misconduct with inmates sexual harassment of inmates Jurisdiction Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Total 1,818 233 1,062 48 1,643 221 1,016 41 Federal 161 10 103 8 182 8 99 6 State Alabama 23 2 4 0 5 1 3 1 Alaskaa,b 0 0 / / 0 0 / / Arizona 61 7 3 3 50 7 0 0 Arkansas 20 6 17 0 8 4 27 3 California 28 1 0 0 17 1 14 0 Colorado 14 1 2 2 32 13 5 0 Connecticut 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 Delaware 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Florida 150 1 210 1 130 2 191 2 Georgia 78 3 29 0 85 3 0 0 Hawaii 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 Idaho 5 5 0 0 3 1 0 0 Illinois 26 4 0 0 29 8 0 0 Indiana 37 6 7 1 14 5 4 0 Iowa 49 8 19 4 53 11 23 4 Kansas 37 7 16 3 22 5 8 2 Kentucky 8 4 0 0 15 9 0 0 Louisiana 47 2 117 0 55 4 37 0 Maine 6 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 Marylandb 19 0 / / 27 1 0 0 Massachusetts 28 5 8 0 68 4 6 0 Michigan 34 1 321 7 20 2 429 6 Minnesota 12 1 1 0 7 0 0 0 Mississippia 1 1 0 0 5 0 / / Missouri 55 11 11 1 69 10 11 1 Montana 18 2 5 0 9 2 0 0 Nebraska 14 0 12 0 18 1 10 1 Nevada 20 3 10 1 8 0 4 0 New Hampshire 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 New Jersey 8 2 2 0 2 1 1 0 New Mexico 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 New York 224 13 39 5 161 8 51 3 North Carolina 101 19 38 0 58 11 16 1 North Dakota 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ohio 50 7 4 0 67 15 9 0 Oklahoma 29 12 5 0 24 6 3 1 Oregon 17 1 4 1 17 3 1 1 Pennsylvania 46 5 33 0 30 9 15 2 Rhode Islanda,b 7 1 / / 5 1 / / South Carolina 5 5 0 0 2 2 0 0 South Dakota 4 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 Tennessee 18 9 1 0 13 7 8 1 129 4 / / 123 8 / / Texasc Utah 5 1 0 0 5 0 1 0 Vermont 23 8 12 5 24 6 9 4 January 2011 27 Appendix Table 20 (continued) Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by federal and state prison authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007–2008 2008 2007 Reported allegations of staff sexual Reported allegations of staff Reported allegations of staff Reported allegations of staff misconduct with inmates sexual harassment of inmates sexual misconduct with inmates sexual harassment of inmates Jurisdiction Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated State (continued) Virginia 30 7 1 0 33 10 2 0 Washington 93 21 9 1 51 13 6 0 West Virginia 13 12 2 2 12 11 0 0 Wisconsin 48 6 12 2 66 4 19 1 Wyoming 2 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 /Not reported. aAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2007. bAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2008. cJurisdiction did not record allegations of staff sexual harassment in 2007 and 2008. 28 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 21 Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of violence, 2007–2008 2008 2007 Reported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-oninmate abusive inmate nonconsensual inmate abusive Average inmate nonconsensual sexual acts sexual contacts sexual acts sexual contacts daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Total / 517 44 196 49 / 455 71 178 45 Alabama Calhoun Co.a,b 343 0 0 / / 400 1 1 / / Etowah Co. Det. Ctr.b 812 3 1 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,099 2 0 0 0 1,212 5 1 0 0 Jefferson Co.b Morgan Co. & Annex ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 270 0 0 1 0 Arizona Maricopa Co.a 9,249 6 3 6 3 9,241 15 7 / / Pima Co. Adult Det. Ctr. 1,921 0 0 1 0 1,891 0 0 0 0 Arkansas Craighead Co. Det. Ctr. 311 1 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Faulkner Co. Det. Ctr.c,d,e 373 1 0 0 0 325 0 0 0 0 Sebastian Co. Adult Det. Ctr. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 381 1 0 0 0 California Alameda Co. 4,431 6 1 1 1 4,278 4 0 0 0 Contra Costa Co.a 1,612 1 0 0 0 1,600 0 0 / / Fresno Co.a 2,961 1 1 1 1 2,861 2 1 / / Kern Co. 2,260 0 0 1 1 2,392 1 0 0 0 Los Angeles Co. - Custody Support Svs.a,b 19,569 13 1 / / 19,374 12 12 / / Madera Co.c 350 2 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Orange Co.b 6,178 1 0 / / 6,360 0 0 0 0 Riverside Co. 3,481 3 0 2 0 3,521 3 3 1 1 Sacramento Co. 4,575 1 1 1 1 2,139 2 2 0 0 San Diego Co. 5,184 1 0 1 1 5,072 0 0 3 2 San Francisco City & Co.a 2,086 2 0 2 0 2,011 8 0 / / San Joaquin Co.a 1,500 2 0 1 0 1,566 0 0 / / San Mateo Co.a 1,125 0 0 0 0 1,198 2 0 / / Santa Clara Co.a 4,610 6 2 0 0 4,640 4 2 / / Solano Co.b 937 1 0 / / 1,065 0 0 0 0 Sonoma Co. 1,027 0 0 3 3 1,056 0 0 0 0 Stanislaus Co. 1,339 0 0 0 0 1,368 1 0 0 0 Tulare Co. 1,529 0 0 0 0 1,527 0 0 1 1 Ventura Co. 835 1 1 0 0 850 0 0 1 1 Colorado Arapahoe Co. 1,171 2 1 2 0 1,352 7 4 2 2 Denver Co.b,f 2,281 4 2 / / 2,395 20 2 / / El Paso Co. 1,538 0 0 3 3 1,522 0 0 1 1 Jefferson Co.f 1,182 0 0 0 0 1,302 3 1 / / Larimer Co. Det. Ctr. 463 0 0 1 0 537 0 0 0 0 347 1 0 / / 368 0 0 0 0 Mesa Co. Det. Fac.b Weld Co. 690 0 0 5 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Florida Alachua Co.b 910 1 0 / / 1,079 0 0 0 0 Brevard Co. Det. Ctr. 1,812 1 1 3 1 1,797 4 0 5 0 Broward Co. 5,364 1 0 0 0 5,305 0 0 2 0 Collier Co. 1,138 0 0 0 0 1,224 2 0 0 0 Escambia Co. 1,812 0 0 2 0 1,881 1 0 1 0 Hillsborough Co.a,b 3,847 4 0 / / 4,015 2 1 / / Jacksonville City 3,727 8 1 6 0 3,629 8 3 5 0 Leon Co. Det. Fac. 1,132 1 0 0 0 1,153 0 0 0 0 Manatee Co. 1,294 3 0 0 0 1,423 19 0 0 0 Marion Co. 1,832 0 0 0 0 2,007 1 0 1 0 Miami-Dade Co. Corr. & Rehab. 7,013 14 0 2 0 6,975 5 0 1 0 Okeechobee Co. 263 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Orange Co. 4,454 4 2 2 1 4,096 0 0 0 0 January 2011 29 Appendix Table 21 (continued) Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of violence, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-oninmate abusive inmate nonconsensual inmate abusive Average inmate nonconsensual sexual acts sexual contacts sexual acts sexual contacts daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Florida (continued) Palm Beach Co.b 2,980 5 0 / / 2,555 2 0 0 0 Pasco Co. 1,277 1 0 0 0 1,271 1 0 0 0 3,368 3 1 0 0 3,593 8 0 / / Pinellas Co.f Polk Co. 2,374 1 0 2 0 2,466 14 0 3 0 Sarasota Co.b,d,g 1,019 1 0 / / 1,045 0 0 0 0 Seminole Co. Corr. Fac. 1,003 3 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ St. Lucie Co. Main Jail 1,550 6 0 1 0 1,434 2 0 2 0 Volusia Co. 1,383 3 0 0 0 1,533 0 0 0 0 Georgia Carroll Co.a,d,g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 533 1 0 / / 1,739 0 0 1 0 1,718 0 0 / / Chatham Co. Adult Det. Ctr.a,d,g Cobb Co. Sheriff’s Office Jail & Prison Unita 2,490 1 1 0 0 2,104 4 1 / / Dougherty Co. 831 0 0 1 0 816 0 0 0 0 Fulton Co.b 2,846 0 0 / / 2,834 5 0 7 0 Gordon Co. 249 0 0 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Gwinnett Co.a 2,691 3 0 0 0 2,478 0 0 / / Muscogee Co.b 565 3 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Walton Co.a 419 0 0 0 0 371 1 1 / / Ware Co. 383 3 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Idaho Ada Co. 980 1 0 2 1 920 0 0 4 1 Canyon Co.b 479 1 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Kootenai Co.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 379 1 1 / / Twin Falls Co.b 203 124 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Illinois Cook Co. - Dept. of Corr. 9,355 14 1 0 0 9,600 10 0 2 0 Kane Co. 671 0 0 0 0 615 0 0 1 0 Winnebago Co. 758 1 0 ~ ~ 665 4 1 1 0 Indiana Elkhart Co. Security Ctr. (Jail)b 747 2 1 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Hamilton Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 327 0 0 2 0 Lake Co.e 923 0 0 1 1 937 0 0 0 0 St. Joseph Co. 650 2 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Vanderburgh Co.f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 708 1 0 / / Vigo Co.b 290 1 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Kansas Chautauqua Co.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 1 0 / / Sedgwick Co. 1,553 0 0 6 0 1,522 1 0 3 0 Shawnee Co. Adult Det. Division ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 475 1 0 4 1 Kentucky Campbell Co.b 425 1 1 / / 427 0 0 0 0 Clark Co. Det.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 1 0 / / Daviess Co. Det. Ctr.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 614 3 0 / / Franklin Co. Reg. Jaild ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 319 1 1 4 0 Henderson Co. Det. Ctr.b,e 547 0 0 / / 496 0 0 8 0 Lexington-Fayette Co. Det. Div.b,e 1,237 2 0 / / 1,252 0 0 0 0 Louisville Metropolitan Dept. of Corr.b 1,902 5 0 / / 1,810 1 0 0 0 30 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 21 (continued) Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of violence, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-oninmate abusive inmate nonconsensual inmate abusive Average inmate nonconsensual sexual acts sexual contacts sexual acts sexual contacts daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Louisiana Avoyelles Parish 1,231 0 0 0 0 1,230 1 1 0 0 1,262 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Bossier Parishh East Baton Rouge Prison 1,671 3 0 4 0 1,606 4 0 3 0 Jefferson Parish Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 839 0 0 1 1 Lafayette Parish Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,090 1 0 2 0 New Orleans Parish Prison System 2,570 7 0 0 0 2,685 3 1 0 0 Richland Parish Det. Ctr.b 854 0 0 / / 840 2 0 0 0 Sherman Walker Corr. Ctr. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 298 2 0 0 0 St. Landry Parish Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 23 2 0 0 0 Terrebonne Parish Jail 670 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Maine Cumberland Co. 402 2 0 0 0 462 0 0 0 0 Kennebec Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 170 1 0 0 0 Maryland Anne Arundel Co. 1,128 5 0 2 0 1,123 0 0 3 3 4,113 5 1 / / 3,899 9 0 0 0 Baltimore Cityb Baltimore Co. Bureau of Corr. 1,360 2 0 4 3 1,356 5 3 0 0 Caroline Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 100 1 0 0 0 Montgomery Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 998 3 0 3 0 Massachusetts 416 1 0 2 0 440 2 1 / / Barnstable Co. Jail & House of Corr.a Bristol Co. 1,483 3 0 7 3 1,472 4 0 3 1 Essex Co. Corr. Fac. 1,624 1 0 0 0 1,631 2 1 0 0 Hampden Co.a 1,911 3 0 0 0 2,138 6 0 / / Hampshire Co. Jail & House of Corr. 288 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Middlesex Co. Jail & House of Corr. 1,294 4 0 0 0 1,326 0 0 1 0 Norfolk Co.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 702 2 0 / / Suffolk Co. 711 0 0 1 0 698 0 0 0 0 Suffolk Co. House of Corr.a 1,733 4 1 11 1 1,685 8 0 / / Worcester Co. Jail & House of Corr.a 1,282 6 1 0 0 1,415 4 0 / / Michigan Berrien Co. 363 0 0 5 1 388 0 0 6 1 Kent Co.a 1,307 0 0 1 1 1,352 0 0 / / Macomb Co.a 1,361 1 0 4 2 1,398 2 1 / / Oakland Co. 1,814 0 0 6 0 1,961 0 0 4 3 St. Joseph Co. 269 0 0 1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Wayne Co.a,b 2,185 10 0 / / 2,713 2 1 / / Minnesota Nobles Co.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 57 1 0 / / Mississippi Harrison Co. 1,160 0 0 0 0 1,150 8 1 0 0 Missouri 121 1 1 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Franklin Co.b Greene Co.c 539 1 0 1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ St. Louis Co. - Dept. of Justice Servicesb 1,186 2 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Montana Cascade Co. Reg. Jail 380 1 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Missoula Co.a 314 1 0 0 0 337 0 0 / / Nebraska Douglas Dept. of Corr. 1,148 0 0 0 0 1,041 2 0 1 1 Lancaster Co. 450 0 0 0 0 474 0 0 2 2 January 2011 31 Appendix Table 21 (continued) Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of violence, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-oninmate abusive inmate nonconsensual inmate abusive Average inmate nonconsensual sexual acts sexual contacts sexual acts sexual contacts daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Nevada Clark Co. Det. Ctr. 3,061 6 0 0 0 3,745 4 0 2 0 Washoe Co. Det. Ctr.b 1,048 0 0 / / 1,200 0 0 7 3 North Las Vegas Det. Corr. Ctr. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 869 1 0 1 1 New Hampshire Hillsborough Co. House of Corr. 583 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Strafford Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 405 1 0 0 0 New Jersey 914 1 0 0 0 909 6 3 / / Atlantic Co. Jail - Dept. of Public Safetya Camden Co. Corr. Fac.b 1,640 4 0 / / 1,608 0 0 0 0 Cumberland Co. 580 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Essex Co. Corr. Fac.b 2,332 1 0 / / 3,028 0 0 0 0 Hudson Co. Corr. Fac. 1,885 4 0 0 0 1,946 4 1 1 0 Mercer Co. Corr. Ctr.b 995 1 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Middlesex Co. Adult Corr. Ctr.a 1,204 3 0 0 0 980 3 2 / / Monmouth Co. Corr. Inst. 977 1 0 2 0 1,209 3 0 0 0 Passaic Co.a 1,509 1 0 0 0 1,912 1 0 / / Union Co. 8,085 1 0 0 0 1,070 2 0 0 0 New Mexico Bernalillo Co./City Det. Ctr. 5,483 2 0 1 0 2,613 7 0 0 0 New York Albany Co. Corr. Fac. 687 0 0 2 0 762 0 0 0 0 1,364 1 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Erie Co. Holding Ctr.b Erie Couny Corr. Fac. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,469 0 0 1 1 New York City 13,546 11 0 2 0 14,064 6 0 4 0 Schenectady Co. 305 0 0 0 0 317 3 0 0 0 North Carolina Gaston Co. 541 0 0 0 0 517 1 1 0 0 Mecklenburg Co.b 2,578 1 0 / / 2,585 0 0 1 0 North Dakota Grand Forks Co. Corr. Ctr.b 171 3 1 / / 159 0 0 1 0 Ohio Butler Co. 1,042 1 0 0 0 1,101 0 0 0 0 Cuyahoga Co. Corr. Ctr. 1,941 1 0 5 0 1,978 3 0 6 1 Franklin Co. 2,202 4 0 0 0 2,314 0 0 0 0 2,019 3 0 0 0 2,086 0 0 2 2 Hamilton Co.d Lorain Co.a 427 0 0 2 1 450 1 0 / / Muskingum Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 154 1 0 0 0 Oklahoma Oklahoma Co.a 2,281 7 0 6 0 2,369 5 1 / / Oregon Deschutes Co. Corr. Fac. 201 0 0 2 0 210 0 0 3 0 Marion Co.b 501 1 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Multnomah Co. Det. Fac. 1,502 4 0 5 0 1,592 10 0 2 0 Pennsylvania Allegheny Co.a 2,749 7 3 0 0 2,650 0 0 / / Berks Co. Prison 1,109 0 0 0 0 1,304 2 1 4 3 Bucks Co. 780 1 0 1 0 1,180 0 0 1 1 Dauphin Co. Prison ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 979 1 0 0 0 Franklin Co. Prisona 358 0 0 0 0 343 2 0 / / 1,160 1 0 0 0 1,197 3 0 / / Lancaster Co. Prisona Lehigh Co. 1,169 0 0 1 0 1,181 5 0 3 0 Montgomery Co. Prison Corr. Fac. 1,742 0 0 0 0 1,614 1 0 0 0 32 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 21 (continued) Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of violence, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-oninmate abusive inmate nonconsensual inmate abusive Average inmate nonconsensual sexual acts sexual contacts sexual acts sexual contacts daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Pennsylvania (continued) Northampton Co. Dept. of Corr.b 779 3 0 / / 906 0 0 0 0 Philadelphia Prison Systemb 9,287 4 0 0 0 10,200 11 0 0 0 2,172 1 0 0 0 2,031 0 0 0 0 York Co. Prisonb South Carolina Charleston Co.a,b 1,694 0 0 / / 1,762 2 0 / / South Dakota Minnehaha Co. 520 1 1 0 0 520 0 0 0 0 Tennessee Blount Co.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 394 1 0 / / Davidson Co. Sheriff’s Office 2,470 2 0 4 3 2,470 6 1 7 1 Rutherford Co. 771 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2,960 4 0 / / 2,960 5 0 / / Shelby Co. Corr. Ctr.a,b Shelby Co. Justice Ctr. 2,678 1 0 0 0 2,733 5 0 0 0 Texas Bexar Co. Adult Det. Ctr.a 4,211 6 2 6 4 3,176 9 0 / / Collin Co. 897 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dallas Co.a,b,e 6,157 4 0 / / 7,180 1 0 / / Ector Co.a,b,g 583 0 0 / / 594 1 0 / / El Paso Co. Det. Fac.a,b 2,209 0 0 / / 2,220 1 0 / / Galveston Co. 1,028 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Harris Co.a,b 10,891 12 1 / / 9,657 19 0 / / Hood Co.b 161 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Nueces Co. 950 3 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Travis Co. 2,431 4 1 5 3 2,623 6 1 9 1 Utah Beaver Co.b 370 1 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Davis Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 736 2 1 1 1 Salt Lake Co. 2,125 6 1 23 2 1,880 7 1 0 0 Utah Co. 646 1 0 1 1 685 1 0 1 1 Weber Co. Corr. Fac. 973 1 1 4 2 770 0 0 13 4 Virginia 520 1 0 / / 538 0 0 0 0 Albemarle-Charlottesville Reg. Jailb Arlington Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 623 0 0 2 1 Blue Ridge Reg. Jail Authority 1,267 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Chesapeake City 1,133 0 0 0 0 1,109 0 0 1 0 Fairfax Co. Adult Det. Ctr. 1,325 2 0 1 0 1,311 1 0 1 1 Hampton Roads Reg. Jail 1,233 5 0 0 0 1,240 0 0 0 0 Henrico Co. 1,214 1 0 0 0 1,135 3 1 1 1 New River Valley Reg. Jaila ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 650 4 0 / / Norfolk Municipal Jail 1,638 0 0 5 0 1,727 0 0 4 0 Northern Neck Reg. Jail 451 0 0 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Northwestern Reg. Adult Det. Ctr.i 672 2 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Prince William-Manassas Reg Adult Corr. Ctr.f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 722 1 0 / / Richmond City 1,527 0 0 0 0 1,564 1 0 0 0 Riverside Reg. Jail 1,192 1 0 0 0 1,146 0 0 0 0 Roanoke Cityb 716 2 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Virginia Beach Municipal Corr. Ctr.a,b 1,461 1 0 / / 1,609 1 0 / / Washington Benton Co. 672 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Clark Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 769 2 1 1 0 King Co.a,b 2,476 7 1 / / 2,727 8 0 / / Kitsap Co. Corr. Ctr. 371 0 0 0 0 435 1 0 0 0 Pierce Co.j 1,334 0 0 1 0 1,471 / / 0 0 Snohomish Co. 1,225 2 0 3 0 1,284 0 0 2 0 Whatcom Co. 428 3 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ January 2011 33 Appendix Table 21 (continued) Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of violence, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-oninmate abusive inmate nonconsensual inmate abusive Average inmate nonconsensual sexual acts sexual contacts sexual acts sexual contacts daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated West Virginia Kanawha Co. South Central Reg. Jaili 454 2 0 / / 453 1 0 1 0 467 0 0 / / 524 3 0 0 0 Raleigh Co. Southern Reg. Jailb Tygart Valley Reg. Jail 356 3 0 1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Wisconsin ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 770 1 1 / / Brown Co.a Dane Co. 926 0 0 1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Milwaukee Co. House of Corr. 1,841 1 0 0 0 2,247 0 0 0 0 Ozaukee Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 220 2 0 0 0 ~Not applicable. /Not reported. aAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007. bAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008. cCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008 are based on substantiated allegations only. dCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007 are based on completed acts only. eCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008 are based on completed acts only. fJurisdiction did not record allegations of abusive sexual contacts in 2007. gCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007 are based on substantiated allegations only. h Jurisdiction did not record allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008. iJurisdiction did not record allegations of abusive sexual contacts in 2008. j Jurisdiction did not record allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007. 34 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 22 Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility Alabama Colorado Albertville City ~ 37 Adams Co. Det. Fac.a,b Baldwin Co. 593 628 Bent Co. Bibb Co. 76 ~ Garfield Co. Brighton Citya ~ 5 Jackson Co. Cullman Co. ~ 5,109 Lincoln Co.b De Kalb Co.b 177 ~ Logan Co. District of Columbia Gardendale City 19 ~ Geneva Co. 58 ~ D.C. Dept. of Corr. Florida Lee Co. Det. Ctr. 338 321 Madison Co. Det. Fac. ~ 967 Bradford Co. Clay Co. Mobile Co. 53 51 Montgomery Co. Det. Fac.a ~ 688 Columbia Co. Det. Ctr.b Opp City 5 ~ Dixie Co. Pickens Co.a ~ 91 Highlands Co. Saraland City ~ 4 Indian River Co. Shelby Co.c 459 ~ Jackson Co. Corr. Fac.a 286 ~ Talledega Co.b Lafayette Co. Alaska Lake Co.a Kotzebue Reg. Jail 15 ~ Lee Co. Petersburg City ~ 1 Martin Co. Sitka City ~ 5 Osceola Co. Arizona Santa Rosa Co. Apache Co. 122 ~ St. Johns Co. Mohave Co. 460 525 Sumter Co. Det. Ctr. Navajo Co. Det. Ctr.c 349 377 Georgia Pinal Co.d 1,229 904 Augusta-Richmond Co. Arkansas Bibb Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. Ashley Co. 40 ~ Chattooga Co. Benton Co. Det. Fac.a ~ 493 Cherokee Co. Crawford Co.a ~ 73 Clarke Co. Jackson Co. Det. Ctr.a ~ 35 Clayton Co. Madison Co. ~ 2 Clinch Co. Mississippi Co. Det. Ctr. 157 ~ Coweta Co.a,b Montgomery Co. 5 ~ Dawson Co. Pulaski Co. Reg. Jail 1,129 932 Decatur Co. Corr. Inst.b ~ 2,796 St. Francis Co.g Dekalb Co.a,b Washington Co. Det. Ctr.b Dodge Co. 549 ~ Early Co. Yell Co. 14 ~ California Effingham Co. Prison Butte Co. 472 ~ Evans Co.a,e,g Humboldt Co. ~ 371 Floyd Co. Prison Imperial Co. 502 489 Forsyth Co. 357 ~ Kings Co.b Glynn Co. Det. Ctr. Lake Co. Hill Road Corr. Fac. ~ 260 Gordon City Marin Co. 309 290 Gwinnett Co Dept. of Corr. Mendocino Co. ~ 308 Hall Co. Det. Ctr.a Merced Co. 769 ~ Houston Co.a Monterey Co. 1,118 1,120 Jackson Co. Placer Co. ~ 595 Jeff Davis Co. San Bernardino Co. West Valley Det. Ctr. 5,500 5,814 Jones Co. Santa Barbara Co. ~ 950 Lamar Co. Sierra Co. 2 ~ Lee Co. Siskiyou Co.a ~ 83 Liberty Co. Jail Tuolumne Co.b 141 ~ Lowndes Co. Madison Co. Yolo Co. ~ 428 Yuba Co. 360 ~ McDuffie Co. Mitchell Co. Corr. Inst. Monroe Co. January 2011 Average daily population, 2008 Average daily population, 2007 1,286 ~ 130 ~ 120 ~ 1,300 22 ~ 1,194 ~ 120 1,911 1,949 125 ~ 295 ~ 459 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2,218 611 1,160 ~ 530 249 ~ 398 ~ 91 ~ 544 226 32 1,033 2,199 601 ~ 520 ~ 275 1,112 ~ ~ 549 365 1,751 26 341 189 260 3,015 68 ~ ~ ~ 739 313 532 0 682 ~ ~ 146 44 126 90 72 ~ 702 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,239 751 58 ~ ~ 1,721 ~ 330 ~ ~ 3,252 ~ 39 242 18 339 ~ ~ ~ ~ 624 405 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 247 ~ 69 153 140 134 35 Appendix Table 22 (continued) Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility Georgia (continued) Kansas Muscogee Co. Prisona,c 568 565 Allen Co. Ford Co. Newton Co. 626 ~ Pike Co. ~ 3 Johnson Co.b Lane Co.b,c Spalding Co. ~ 459 ~ 378 Spalding Co. Corr. Inst.a Linn Co. Thomas Co.a Montgomery Co. ~ 210 Pratt Co. Troup Co. 465 ~ Smith Co. Troup Co. Corr. Inst. ~ 351 Kentucky Idaho Boone Co.b Bonneville Co. 238 288 10 ~ Boyd Co. Idaho Co.b Breckinridge Co. Power Co. ~ 10 Illinois Casey Co./State Jail Christian Co.b Adams Co. ~ 101 De Kalb Co. ~ 102 Clay Co. Det. Ctr. Du Page Co.b Crittenden Co. 841 820 ~ 4 Graves Co. Edgar Co.e,g Kankakee Co. ~ 506 Grayson Co. Jail & Annex Lawrence Co. ~ 19 Hardin Co. Det. Ctr.a McDonough Co.b Laurel Co. 34 ~ Pike Co. Macon Co. 251 ~ Three Forks Reg. Jail Monroe Co. 10 ~ Webster Co. Peoria Co. 499 445 Rock Island Co.a ~ 266 Louisiana Saline Co. Law Enforcement & Det. Ctr. 81 ~ Ascension Parish Jail Sangamon Co. 340 ~ Bayou Dorcheat Corr. Ctr. Stephenson Co.b 134 ~ Beauregard Parish Jaila Vermilion Co. ~ 260 Caddo Parish Corr. Ctr. Indiana Calvasieu Parish Corr. Ctr.a,b Adams Co. 65 ~ Caldwell Parish Jails - (3 Facilities)a,b Allen Co. ~ 700 Catahoula Parish Jail & Det. Faca Bartholomew Co.a 154 192 Claiborne Det. Ctr. Delaware Co. Justice Ctr.a 318 317 De Soto Parish Jailc Grant Co. Security Complex 251 ~ East Carroll Det. Ctr. Greene Co. ~ 64 Evangeline Parish Jaild,h Hancock Co. ~ 148 Iberia Parish Jailb Harrison Co.b 170 ~ La Salle Parish Jail Howard Co. 341 ~ Morehouse Parish Jaila,e Jay Co. ~ 40 Morgan City Johnson Co. ~ 290 Ouachita Parish Corr. Fac. Knox Co. ~ 153 Pointe Coupee Parish Det. Ctr. Marion Co.d ~ 1,361 Rapides Parish Porter Co.a,b 467 467 St. Charles Parish Jailb Wells Co. 91 93 St. Tammany Parish Iowa Union Parish Det. Ctr. Black Hawk Co. 183 257 West Baton Rouge Parish Buena Vista Co. 24 ~ Maine Carroll Co. ~ 12 Hancock Co. Clinton Co. 9 ~ Two Bridges Reg. Jaila Decatur Co. 5 ~ Maryland Delaware Co. ~ 7 Carroll Co. Det. Ctr. Emmet Co. 8 ~ Charles Co. Det. Ctr. Howard Co. ~ 7 Harford Co. Det. Ctr. Marshall Co. ~ 146 Prince Georges Co. Corr. Ctr. Polk Co. 648 ~ Wicomico Co. Det. Ctr.a Scott Co. Jail & Annex 8,829 295 Worcester Co. Sioux Co. ~ 37 36 Average daily population, 2008 Average daily population, 2007 ~ 91 715 2 8 ~ ~ 7 53 ~ 863 ~ ~ 144 15 ~ 448 ~ 191 308 632 235 ~ ~ 580 ~ ~ 300 205 109 ~ 227 ~ ~ 686 ~ 12 101 ~ 545 292 ~ ~ 108 258 ~ ~ 1,400 1,249 318 ~ 525 110 688 ~ 485 ~ 160 59 900 174 272 532 ~ 360 ~ ~ 524 168 1,450 1,197 318 22 ~ ~ 1,125 72 ~ 23 535 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 746 347 250 44 ~ ~ 9,464 271 377 461 1,385 492 253 283 ~ 400 1,486 628 ~ Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 22 (continued) Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility Massachusetts Missouri (continued) 1,516 1,596 Plymouth Co. House of Corr. & Jaila St. Clair Co. Michigan St. Louis Cityb Antrim Co. 40 ~ Stoddard Co. Bay Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. ~ 219 Montana Benzie Co. ~ 31 Fallon Co.a Calhoun Co. 497 ~ Flathead Co. Det. Ctr.d Cass Co. ~ 126 Gallatin Co. Det. Ctr. Emmet Co. 86 ~ Pondera Co. Ingham Co.b,f 672 685 Sanders Co. Kalamazoo Co.b 324 365 Nebraska ~ 86 Mecosta Co.a Box Butte Co.b Monroe Co. 328 ~ Hamilton Co. Saginaw Co.a Harlan Co. ~ 516 Morrill Co. St. Clair Co. 428 408 Sarpy Co. Minnesota Thayer Co. Anoka Co. 228 ~ Nevada Beltrami Co. ~ 121 Las Vegas City Det. Ctr.b Dakota Co. ~ 335 Hennepin Co. Adult Det. Ctr. 728 ~ New Hampshire Hennepin Co. Workhouse ~ 582 Carroll Co. House of Corr. & Jail Itasca Co.b 83 ~ Rockingham Co. Jail & House of Corr. Koochiching Co. Law Enforcement Ctr.b New Jersey 14 ~ Bergen Co. Jail & Annex Lyon Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. ~ 30 Burlington Co. Marshall Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. ~ 10 Gloucester Co. Olmsted Co. ~ 280 Hunterdon Co.b Otter Tail Co. Det. Ctr. 58 ~ Ramsey Co. Corr. Fac. 398 ~ Morris Co. Corr. Fac. 566 581 Sherburne Co.b Somerset Co. Jail & Annex Mississippi New Mexico Calhoun Co. ~ 47 Catron Co. Carroll/Montgomery Region Corr. Ctr. 337 ~ Curry Co. 44 ~ Clarke Co.b Dona Ana Co. Det. Ctr. Clay Co.e ~ 10 Lea Co. Hinds Co.a,b 1,042 931 Luna Co. Holmes-Humphrey Reg. Corr. Fac. 379 ~ Gallup-McKinley Adult Det. Ctr. Jackson Co.b 412 ~ Roosevelt Co.i Jefferson/Franklin Corr. Fac. 296 ~ Sandoval Co. Lafayette Co.a ~ 130 San Juan Co. Det. Ctr. Lauderdale Co.a New York ~ 270 Chenango Co.b Leake Co. Corr. Fac. 361 373 Jefferson Co. Leflore Co. 125 ~ 416 58 Madison Co. Rankin Co.a,i Walthall Co. ~ 22 Monroe Co.a Webster Co. 12 ~ Montgomery Co. Winston/Choctaw Reg. Corr. Fac.a ~ 350 Nassau Co. Corr. Ctr.f Missouri Niagara Co.i Arnold Municipal Citya Oneida Co. Corr. Fac. ~ 7 Onondaga Co. Dept. of Corr. Bates Co. Sheriff & Jaila ~ 104 Ontario Co.g Belton Cityb 10 ~ Clay Co. Det. Ctr. 322 ~ Rensselaer Co. Douglas Co. ~ 19 Rockland Co. Corr. Ctr. ~ 784 Jackson Co. Det. Ctr.g St. Lawrence Co. Kansas City Corr. Inst. 148 ~ Suffolk Co. Lincoln Co.a ~ 147 Tioga Co. Marion Co. 6 ~ Westchester Co. Montgomery Co. ~ 76 Ozark Co. 16 ~ Pulaski Co. ~ 30 St. Charles Co. ~ 329 January 2011 Average daily population, 2008 Average daily population, 2007 ~ 1,672 65 118 1,200 ~ ~ ~ 81 6 ~ 1 92 ~ ~ 20 16 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ 6 3 13 153 ~ 820 100 ~ 332 88 ~ ~ ~ 373 102 327 ~ 970 703 ~ ~ 308 324 ~ 37 852 ~ ~ 328 79 396 ~ 4 ~ ~ 299 392 ~ ~ ~ 606 79 142 3 1,343 ~ 1,607 489 ~ 474 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,695 ~ 1,478 ~ ~ ~ 1,450 126 1,716 ~ 468 ~ 214 282 262 112 1,752 83 1,465 37 Appendix Table 22 (continued) Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility North Carolina Pennsylvania Buncombe Co. 409 475 Adams Co. Cabarrus Co. ~ 217 Blair Co. Prisoni Duplin Co. ~ 16 Centre Co. Prison Durham Co.a ~ 618 Clearfield Co. Prison Edgecombe Co.b,h 282 260 Clinton Co. Prisonb Forsyth Co. 891 ~ Erie Co. Guilford Co. ~ 926 Greene Co. Prison ~ 161 Lee Co.a Lackawanna Co. Prisona 104 ~ McDowell Co.b Lebanon Co. Corr. Fac.a,b Moore Co.j 129 ~ Lycoming Co. Prison Monroe Co. Corr. Fac. Pamlico Co. ~ 87 Richmond Co.b Washington Co.b 86 87 377 ~ Robeson Co.b South Carolina Rowan Co. 274 ~ Abbeville Co. Det. Ctr.b Vance Co. ~ 153 Aiken Co. Det. Ctr. Wake Co. 1,331 1,211 Anderson Co. Wilson Co. 220 ~ Beaufort Co. Det. Ctr.b Berkeley Co. Det. Ctr. North Dakota Dillon Co. Det. Ctr. Cass Co. 198 175 Dorchester Co. Pembina Co. 7 ~ Fairfield Co. Det. Ctr. Ohio Clermont Co. 304 ~ Florence Co. Det. Ctr. Greenville Co. Det. Ctr.a Clinton Co. 19 ~ Horry Co. Det. Ctr.b Crawford Co. 111 112 b 163 ~ Orangeburg-Calhoun Reg. Det. Ctr. Delaware Co. Fayette Co.b Pickens Co. 52 ~ Richland Co. Det. Ctr. Greene Co. ~ 381 Spartanburg Co. Det. Fac.a Highland Co. ~ 71 York Co. Moss Justice Ctr.b Lake Co. Adult Det. Ctr. 318 ~ South Dakota Mahoning Co. 561 527 ~ 104 Bon Homme Co. Miami Co.a Niles City 2 ~ Hughes Co. Noble Co. ~ 20 Meade Co. Richland Co. ~ 152 Pennington Co. Jail Summit Co. Jail & Glenwood Annex 658 ~ Winner Citya,g Tennessee Oklahoma Carroll Co.b Carter Co. ~ 185 a 291 298 Comanche Co. Greene Co. Grady Co. 334 ~ Knox Co. Latimer Co. 100 ~ Lawrence Co. Midwest City ~ 48 Lincoln Co.f Muldrow City ~ 6 Loudon Co.b,f Muskogee Co./City Det. Ctr. ~ 287 Madison Co. Penal Farm Roger Mills Co.h ~ 17 Marion Co. Rogers Co.b 192 ~ Monroe Co. Stephens Co.a ~ 108 Putnam Co. Washington Co. 102 91 Sequatchie Co. Woodward Co.b,c Sevier Co.b 31 ~ Oregon Sullivan Co. ~ 336 Clackamas Co.a Sumner Co.a Grant Co. 24 ~ Warren Co.b Lake Co. ~ 15 Washington Co.I,j Lane Co. 330 558 Williamson Co.a,b Polk Co. ~ 115 Wilson Co. Tillamook Co.b 73 ~ 38 Average daily population, 2008 Average daily population, 2007 ~ 304 ~ 135 318 632 ~ 1,013 518 ~ 344 413 312 ~ 212 ~ 298 ~ 105 1,072 538 336 ~ ~ 61 422 428 300 ~ ~ 295 6 ~ 1,367 656 ~ ~ 1,153 ~ 425 ~ ~ ~ ~ 362 160 ~ ~ 426 1,418 ~ 336 96 1,100 919 ~ ~ 48 ~ 420 ~ 6 ~ 45 ~ 63 76 366 979 130 125 91 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 366 675 ~ 212 519 311 ~ 74 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 80 101 165 208 90 305 584 616 ~ ~ 341 250 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 22 (continued) Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Texas Virginia (continued) Angelina Co. 258 ~ Rappahannock Co. ~ 16 Bandera Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. ~ 12 Rappahannock Reg. Jail & Annexb 1,017 1,003 Bell Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. 672 ~ Roanoke Co. 286 ~ Bowie Co. ~ 895 Rockingham Reg. Jail ~ 295 Brazos Co.c,f 553 ~ Southwest Virginia Reg. 1,102 1,379 Burnet Co. ~ 89 Virginia Peninsula Reg. Jail ~ 489 Caldwell Co.g ~ 168 Washington 100 971 ~ 47 Cameron Co.a Asotin Co.a g ~ 114 22 ~ Chambers Co. Buckley Cityb Denton Co. Det. Ctr.a Kent Cityd 1,121 1,065 ~ 139 Edwards Co. 9 ~ Kirkland City ~ 7 Fayette Co. Justice Ctr. 21 37 Skagit Co. 237 ~ Grayson Co. ~ 382 Spokane Co. Geiger Corr. Ctr. 510 562 Guadalupe Co. Det. Ctr.a 378 460 West Virginia Harrison Co. 133 ~ Marshall Co. Northern Reg Jail & Corr. Complex ~ 314 Hays Co. 315 ~ North Central Reg. Jail 517 ~ 1,132 1,185 ~ 461 Hidalgo Co. Adult Det. Ctr.b,g Western Reg. Jaile,g 384 ~ Hunt Co. Criminal Justice Ctr.b,f Wisconsin Jasper Co. Law Enforcement Ctr.a Adams Co. ~ 64 ~ 62 Barron Co. Justice Ctr. ~ 123 Jefferson Co. Det. Ctr.a,b 924 1,176 Burnett Co. Law Enforcement Ctr.b Lipscomb Co. ~ 2 30 ~ a Lubbock Co. 724 1,000 Dodge Co. 462 463 McLennan Co. 869 860 Dunn Co.c 113 ~ Maverick Co. ~ 230 Eau Claire Co. ~ 274 Midland Co. ~ 280 Marathon Co. Adult Det. Fac.d ~ 300 Milwaukee Co. 890 947 Mills Co. 7 ~ Racine Co.b 788 ~ Montgomery Co. 815 1,112 310 ~ Richland Co.a ~ 27 Parker Co.b Randall Co. ~ 272 Rock Co. ~ 521 Rusk Co.a,b Shawano Co. 510 ~ 89 88 Waukesha Co. 655 ~ San Patricio Co. 192 ~ Shelby Co. ~ 51 Winnebago Co. 319 ~ Sherman Co. ~ 2 Wyoming Tarrant Co.a,b 3,333 3,377 Fremont Co. ~ 166 Tom Green Co.a ~ 415 Laramie Co. 222 ~ Upton Co. 38 ~ Natrona Co. Det. Ctr.a ~ 297 Victoria Co.b 450 ~ Platte Co. 97 ~ Walker Co. ~ 130 Sheridan Co. 90 ~ Wichita Co.i 435 435 Sweetwater Co.a ~ 119 ~Not applicable. Facility not sampled in survey year. Zavala Co. 9 ~ aAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual Utah sexual acts in 2007. Cache Co.a ~ 306 bAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual Tooele Co. ~ 119 sexual acts in 2008. Virginia cCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008 are based on substantiated allegations only. Accomack Co. ~ 113 dJurisdiction did not record allegations of abusive sexual contacts in 2007. Alexandria City Det. Ctr.b 540 ~ eCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007 are based on completed acts only. Botetourt Co.b 91 ~ fCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008 are based on completed acts only. Central Virginia Reg. Jail 372 395 gCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007 are based on substantiated allegations only. Danville City ~ 208 hJurisdiction did not record allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007. a,b,c,e,f,g 149 164 Danville City Prison Farm iJurisdiction did not record allegations of abusive sexual contacts in 2008. Middle River Reg. Jail 651 ~ jJurisdiction did not record allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008. Newport News City 629 ~ Pamunkey Reg. Jail ~ 455 Patrick Co. 27 ~ Peumansend Creek Reg. Jaila 275 288 January 2011 39 Appendix Table 23 Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate sexual harassment sexual misconduct sexual harassment Average daily sexual misconduct Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Total / 239 38 87 9 / 256 73 79 15 Alabama 343 0 0 / / 400 1 1 / / Calhoun Co.a,b Cullman Co.c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5,109 1 1 0 0 Jefferson Co.a,b 1,099 0 0 / / 1,212 2 0 / / Lee Co. Det. Ctr. 338 0 0 0 0 321 1 1 0 0 Morgan Co. & Annex ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 270 1 1 0 0 Arizona 9,249 3 2 / / 9,241 0 0 / / Maricopa Co.a,b Pima Co. Adult Det. Ctr. 1,921 1 0 1 1 1,891 1 0 0 0 Pinal Co. 1,229 1 1 0 0 904 0 0 0 0 Arkansas Faulkner Co. Det. Ctr. 373 1 0 0 0 325 0 0 0 0 Pulaski Co. Reg. Jail 1,129 1 1 0 0 932 0 0 0 0 California Contra Costa Co. 1,612 0 0 0 0 1,600 1 1 0 0 Fresno Co. 2,961 2 2 1 0 2,861 0 0 0 0 Humboldt Co.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 371 1 0 / / Imperial Co. 502 0 0 0 0 489 3 1 0 0 Kern Co. 2,260 1 0 0 0 2,392 0 0 0 0 Los Angeles Co.-Custody Support Svs.b 19,569 1 0 / / 19,374 2 1 0 0 Riverside Co. 3,481 1 0 0 0 3,521 1 1 0 0 San Bernardino Co. West Valley Det. Ctr. 5,500 4 2 0 0 5,814 0 0 0 0 San Diego Co. 5,184 4 0 0 0 5,072 0 0 1 0 San Francisco City & Co. 2,086 2 0 0 0 2,011 0 0 1 0 1,500 2 1 / / 1,566 0 0 / / San Joaquin Co.a,b Santa Clara Co.a 4,610 3 2 0 0 4,640 0 0 / / Colorado Arapahoe Co. 1,171 0 0 0 0 1,352 0 0 1 0 Bent Co.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 22 2 1 / / El Paso Co. 1,538 0 0 0 0 1,522 1 0 0 0 Jefferson Co. 1,182 0 0 2 0 1,302 0 0 0 0 Larimer Co. Det. Ctr. 463 1 0 0 0 537 0 0 1 0 Weld Co. 690 2 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ District of Columbia D.C. Dept. of Corr. 1,911 0 0 0 0 1,949 4 0 1 0 Florida Alachua Co.a,b 910 1 0 / / 1,079 1 1 / / Brevard Co. Det. Ctr. 1,812 1 0 0 0 1,797 0 0 0 0 Broward Co. 5,364 6 0 6 0 5,305 5 1 2 0 Collier Co. 1,138 4 1 0 0 1,224 1 1 0 0 Highlands Co. 459 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lee Co. 2,218 0 0 0 0 2,199 1 0 0 0 Manatee Co. 1,294 0 0 0 0 1,423 2 0 0 0 Marion Co. 1,832 0 0 0 0 2,007 1 0 0 0 Miami-Dade Co. Corr. & Rehab. 7,013 6 0 4 1 6,975 0 0 4 0 Palm Beach Co. 2,980 0 0 0 0 2,555 1 1 0 0 Polk Co. 2,374 1 1 0 0 2,466 2 2 2 2 Volusia Co. 1,383 1 0 0 0 1,533 0 0 0 0 Georgia Cherokee Co. 549 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Clayton Co. 1,751 0 0 0 0 1,721 1 1 3 3 Fulton Co.a,b 2,846 0 0 / / 2,834 1 0 / / Gwinnett Co. 2,691 1 0 1 0 2,478 2 0 0 0 40 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 23 (continued) Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate sexual harassment sexual misconduct sexual harassment Average daily sexual misconduct Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Georgia (continued) Muscogee Co. 565 3 0 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Spalding Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 459 1 0 0 0 Walton Co. 419 0 0 0 0 371 1 1 0 0 Idaho Ada Co. 980 0 0 0 0 920 0 0 2 0 Illinois Cook Co. - Dept. of Corr. 9,355 2 1 0 0 9,600 1 1 0 0 Du Page Co. 841 1 0 0 0 820 0 0 0 0 Edgar Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 1 0 0 0 Peoria Co. 499 0 0 0 0 445 1 0 0 0 Winnebago Co.e 758 1 0 0 0 665 0 0 0 0 Indiana 467 1 1 / / 467 0 0 / / Porter Co.a,b Vigo Co. 290 2 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Wells Co. 91 1 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 Iowa Polk Co. 648 0 0 2 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Kansas Allen Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 53 2 2 0 0 Sedgwick Co. 1,553 0 0 1 0 1,522 4 1 0 0 Shawnee Co. Adult Det. Division ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 475 2 0 1 1 Kentucky Daviess Co. Det. Ctr. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 614 1 0 0 0 Franklin Co. Reg. Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 319 2 0 0 0 Henderson Co. Det. Ctr.d,e 547 2 1 / / 496 0 0 2 0 Lexington-Fayette Co. Det. Div.d 1,237 5 0 / / 1,252 3 3 0 0 Louisville Metropolitan Dept. of Corr.b 1,902 3 1 / / 1,810 1 1 4 0 Louisiana Beauregard Parish Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 168 2 2 0 0 Caddo Parish Corr. Ctr. 1,400 0 0 0 0 1,450 3 0 0 0 Claiborne Det. Ctr. 525 3 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lafayette Parish Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,090 1 1 1 1 West Baton Rouge Parish ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 250 1 0 0 0 Maine Cumberland Co. 402 1 0 0 0 462 1 0 0 0 Two Bridges Reg. Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9,464 1 1 0 0 Maryland Anne Arundel Co.a 1,128 0 0 0 0 1,123 4 0 / / Baltimore Co. Bureau of Corr. 1,360 0 0 1 0 1,356 0 0 0 0 Caroline Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 100 1 0 0 0 Carroll Co. Det. Ctr. 271 0 0 0 0 283 3 0 0 0 Montgomery Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 998 2 1 1 0 492 1 1 0 0 628 1 0 / / Wicomico Co. Det. Ctr.a Massachusetts Barnstable Co. Jail & House of Corr. 416 1 0 0 0 440 0 0 2 0 Bristol Co. 1,483 4 0 1 0 1,472 1 0 0 0 Essex Co. Corr. Fac. 1,624 2 0 0 0 1,631 0 0 0 0 Hampden Co. 1,911 0 0 0 0 2,138 1 0 1 0 Middlesex Co. Jail & House of Corr. 1,294 0 0 0 0 1,326 1 0 1 0 Suffolk Co. 711 1 0 0 0 698 0 0 0 0 Suffolk Co. House of Corr. 1,733 1 1 0 0 1,685 1 0 0 0 Worcester Co. Jail & House of Corr.b 1,282 1 0 / / 1,415 0 0 0 0 January 2011 41 Appendix Table 23 (continued) Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate sexual harassment sexual misconduct sexual harassment Average daily sexual misconduct Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Michigan Berrien Co. 363 1 0 0 0 388 0 0 0 0 Macomb Co. 1,361 0 0 0 0 1,398 1 1 0 0 Oakland Co. 1,814 1 0 0 0 1,961 0 0 0 0 Minnesota Sherburne Co.b,c 566 0 0 / / 581 1 0 1 0 Mississippi Missouri Bates Co. Sheriff & Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 104 1 0 0 0 Kansas City Corr. Inst. 148 8 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Pulaski Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 30 1 0 0 0 St. Clair Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 118 1 1 0 0 St. Louis City 1,672 1 0 18 0 1,200 0 0 0 0 St. Louis Co. - Dept. of Justice Services 1,186 2 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Montana Gallatin Co. Det. Ctr. 81 5 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Nebraska Sarpy Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 153 1 0 0 0 Nevada Clark Co. Det. Ctr. 3,061 3 0 0 0 3,745 4 0 0 0 Washoe Co. Det. Ctr. 1,048 3 0 0 0 1,200 0 0 0 0 Las Vegas City Det. Ctr. 820 0 0 0 0 100 1 0 0 0 New Hampshire Carroll Co. House of Corr. & Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 88 0 0 2 0 Strafford Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 405 1 1 0 0 New Jersey 914 1 0 0 0 909 2 0 / / Atlantic Co. Jail - Dept. of Public Safetya Essex Co. Corr. Fac. 2,332 1 0 0 0 3,028 0 0 0 0 Hudson Co. Corr. Fac. 1,885 1 0 0 0 1,946 1 0 0 0 Hunterdon Co.b 102 1 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Mercer Co. Corr. Ctr.b 995 3 3 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Middlesex Co. Adult Corr. Ctr.a 1,204 1 0 0 0 980 0 0 / / Monmouth Co. Corr. Inst. 977 1 0 1 0 1,209 0 0 0 0 Morris Co. Corr. Fac. 327 1 0 0 0 308 0 0 0 0 Passaic Co.a 1,509 1 0 0 0 1,912 0 0 / / Union Co. 8,085 0 0 1 0 1,070 0 0 0 0 New Mexico Bernalillo Co./City Det. Ctr. 5,483 1 0 0 0 2,613 5 3 0 0 Gallup-Mckinley Adult Det. Ctr. 328 3 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ New York Nassau Co. Corr. Ctr. 1,607 1 0 0 0 1,716 2 0 1 0 New York City 13,546 28 0 11 0 14,064 18 0 10 0 Ontario Co.c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 214 1 0 0 0 Rensselaer Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 282 1 0 0 0 Suffolk Co. 1,695 1 0 1 0 1,752 0 0 0 0 Westchester Co. 1,478 2 0 0 0 1,465 1 0 0 0 North Carolina Durham Co.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 618 1 0 / / Mecklenburg Co.b 2,578 1 0 / / 2,585 4 0 2 1 North Dakota Cass Co. 198 0 0 0 0 175 2 0 0 0 42 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 23 (continued) Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate sexual harassment sexual misconduct sexual harassment Average daily sexual misconduct Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Ohio Cuyahoga Co. Corr. Ctr. 1,941 0 0 2 1 1,978 1 0 0 0 Franklin Co.a 2,202 0 0 1 1 2,314 0 0 / / Highland Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 71 1 0 6 0 Lake Co. Adult Det. Ctr. 318 1 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Oregon Clackamas Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 336 1 0 0 0 Deschutes Co. Corr. Fac. 201 0 0 0 0 210 1 0 0 0 Lane Co. 330 2 0 0 0 558 2 0 1 0 Multnomah Co. Det. Fac. 1,502 12 1 4 1 1,592 14 0 5 1 Pennsylvania Clinton Co. Prisonb 318 0 0 / / 298 1 0 0 0 Dauphin Co. Prison ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 979 2 0 0 0 Franklin Co. Prison 358 0 0 2 0 343 0 0 0 0 Lackawanna Co. Prison 1,013 0 0 0 0 1,072 1 0 0 0 Lancaster Co. Prison 1,160 0 0 0 0 1,197 3 1 0 0 Montgomery Co Prison Corr. Fac. 1,742 0 0 0 0 1,614 1 0 0 0 Northampton Co. Dept. of Corr. 779 0 0 1 1 906 0 0 0 0 9,287 2 0 / / 10,200 21 12 0 0 Philadelphia Prison Systemb South Carolina Dillon Co. Det. Ctr. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 160 1 1 0 0 Dorchester Co. 295 1 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Orangeburg-Calhoun Reg. Det. Ctr. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 336 1 0 1 0 Richland Co. Det. Ctr. 1,153 0 0 0 0 1,100 0 0 6 0 Spartanburg Co. Det. Fac. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 919 0 0 1 1 York Co Moss Justice Ctr.b 425 1 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Davidson Co. Sheriffs Office 2,470 3 2 0 0 2,470 9 7 1 1 Knox Co. 979 2 0 2 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Sequatchie Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 90 2 0 0 0 Sevier Co. 366 1 0 1 0 305 0 0 0 0 Shelby Co. Justice Ctr. 2,678 2 1 1 0 2,733 1 0 1 0 Texas Bexar Co. Adult Det. Ctr.a 4,211 4 0 0 0 3,176 3 0 / / Burnet Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 89 1 0 0 0 Chambers Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 114 1 0 0 0 Dallas Co. 6,157 0 0 0 0 7,180 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 382 1 0 / / Grayson Co.a Harris Co. 10,891 6 1 1 1 9,657 3 0 0 0 Hunt Co. Criminal Justice Ctr.b 384 2 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Travis Co. 2,431 1 0 0 0 2,623 4 0 1 0 Utah Davis Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 736 1 1 0 0 Salt Lake Co. 2,125 1 0 7 0 1,880 9 7 2 2 Utah Co.b 646 1 1 / / 685 0 0 0 0 Virginia Arlington Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 623 2 0 0 0 Blue Ridge Reg. Jail Authority 1,267 2 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Chesapeake City 1,133 3 1 2 0 1,109 2 0 1 1 Fairfax Co. Adult Det. Ctr. 1,325 0 0 0 0 1,311 1 0 0 0 Hampton Roads Reg. Jail 1,233 2 0 0 0 1,240 0 0 0 0 Henrico Co. 1,214 0 0 0 0 1,135 1 1 0 0 New River Valley Reg. Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 650 4 0 0 0 Northwestern Reg. Adult Det. Ctr. 672 3 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ January 2011 43 Appendix Table 23 (continued) Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by local jail authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate Reported staff-on-inmate sexual harassment sexual misconduct sexual harassment Average daily sexual misconduct Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Virginia (continued) Pamunkey Reg. Jail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 455 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 722 2 2 / / Prince William-Manassas Reg Adult Corr. Ctr.a Richmond City 1,527 0 0 0 0 1,564 1 0 0 0 Riverside Reg. Jail 1,192 1 1 1 0 1,146 3 2 0 0 Roanoke Cityb 716 1 1 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Southwest Virginia Reg. 1,102 0 0 0 0 1,379 1 1 0 0 Virginia Beach Municipal Corr. Ctr. 1,461 1 0 0 0 1,609 1 0 0 0 Washington Clark Co. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 769 5 1 1 1 King Co. 2,476 10 0 7 0 2,727 6 0 1 0 Kitsap Co. Corr. Ctr. 371 0 0 1 0 435 0 0 0 0 Pierce Co.b 1,334 4 0 / / 1,471 3 0 0 0 Snohomish Co. 1,225 3 0 0 0 1,284 0 0 0 0 West Virginia 454 2 1 / / 453 0 0 2 0 Kanawha Co. South Central Reg. Jailb Raleigh Co. Southern Reg. Jailb 467 1 0 / / 524 0 0 0 0 Wisconsin Dunn Co. 113 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Marathon Co. Adult Det. Fac.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 300 1 0 / / Milwaukee Co. 890 0 0 0 0 947 1 1 0 0 Milwaukee Co. House of Corr. 1,841 2 0 0 0 2,247 0 0 2 0 Winnebago Co. 319 0 0 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Not applicable. /Not reported. aAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2007. bAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2008. cCounts of staff sexual misconduct in 2007 are based on substantiated allegations only. dJurisdiction did not record allegations of staff sexual harassment in 2008. eCounts of staff sexual misconduct in 2008 are based on substantiated allegations only. 44 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 24 Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility Alabama Sonoma Co. Albertville City ~ 37 Stanislaus Co. Baldwin Co. 593 628 Tulare Co. Bibb Co. 76 ~ Tuolumne Co. Brighton Citya Ventura Co. ~ 5 Yolo Co. De Kalb Co.b 177 ~ Yuba Co. Etowah Co. Det. Ctr. 812 ~ Colorado Gardendale City 19 ~ Adams Co. Det. Fac. Geneva Co. 58 ~ Denver Co.a,b Madison Co. Det. Fac. ~ 967 Garfield Co. Mobile Co. 53 51 Jackson Co. ~ 688 Montgomery Co. Det. Fac.a Lincoln Co.b Opp City 5 ~ Pickens Co.c ~ 91 Logan Co. Saraland City ~ 4 Mesa Co. Det. Fac. Shelby Co. 459 ~ Florida Talledega Co. 286 ~ Bradford Co. Alaska Clay Co.a Columbia Co. Det. Ctr.b Kotzebue Reg. Jail 15 ~ Dixie Co. Petersburg City ~ 1 Escambia Co. Sitka City ~ 5 Hillsborough Co.a Arizona Apache Co. 122 ~ Indian River Co. Mohave Co. 460 525 Jackson Co. Corr. Fac.a Jacksonville City Navajo Co. Det. Ctr. 349 377 Lafayette Co. Arkansas Lake Co.a Ashley Co. 40 ~ ~ 493 Benton Co. Det. Fac.a Leon Co. Det. Fac.a Craighead Co. Det. Ctr. 311 ~ Martin Co. Crawford Co. ~ 73 Okeechobee Co. Jackson Co. Det. Ctr. ~ 35 Orange Co. Madison Co. ~ 2 Osceola Co. Mississippi Co. Det. Ctr. 157 ~ Pasco Co. Montgomery Co. 5 ~ Pinellas Co.a St. Francis Co. ~ 2,796 Santa Rosa Co.a Sebastian Co. Adult Det. Ctr. ~ 381 Sarasota Co. Washington Co. Det. Ctr.b 549 ~ Seminole Co. Corr. Fac. Yell Co. 14 ~ St. Johns Co.b California St. Lucie Co. Main Jail Alameda Co. 4,431 4,278 Sumter Co. Det. Ctr. Butte Co. 472 ~ Georgia Kings Co.b 357 ~ Augusta-Richmond Co. Lake Co. Hill Road Corr. Fac.a ~ 260 Bibb Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. Madera Co. 350 ~ Carroll Co. Marin Co. 309 290 Chatham Co. Adult Det. Ctr.a,e Chattooga Co.a Mendocino Co. ~ 308 Merced Co. 769 ~ Clarke Co. Monterey Co. 1,118 1,120 Clinch Co.b Orange Co. 6,178 6,360 Cobb Co. Sheriff’s Office Jail & Prison Unita Placer Co. ~ 595 Coweta Co.a Sacramento Co. 4,575 2,139 Dawson Co. 1,125 1,198 San Mateo Co.c,d Decatur Co. Corr. Inst. Santa Barbara Co. ~ 950 Dekalb Co. Sierra Co. 2 ~ Dodge Co. Siskiyou Co. ~ 83 Dougherty Co. Solano Co.b 937 1,065 Early Co. January 2011 Average daily Average daily population, 2008 population, 2007 1,027 1,056 1,339 1,368 1,529 1,527 141 ~ 835 850 ~ 428 360 ~ 1,286 2,281 130 ~ 120 ~ 347 1,300 2,395 ~ 1,194 ~ 120 368 125 ~ 295 ~ 1,812 3,847 ~ ~ 3,727 ~ ~ 1,132 611 263 4,454 1,160 1,277 3,368 ~ 1,019 1,003 530 1,550 249 ~ 398 ~ 91 1,881 4,015 544 226 3,629 32 1,033 1,153 601 ~ 4,096 ~ 1,271 3,593 520 1,045 ~ ~ 1,434 275 1,112 ~ ~ 1,739 ~ 365 26 2,490 341 189 260 3,015 68 831 ~ 1,239 751 533 1,718 58 ~ ~ 2,104 330 ~ ~ 3,252 ~ 816 39 45 Appendix Table 24 (continued) Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility Effingham Co. Prison ~ 242 Grant Co. Security Complex ~ 18 Evans Co.c Greene Co. Floyd Co. Prison 739 339 Hamilton Co. Forsyth Co. 313 ~ Hancock Co. Glynn Co. Det. Ctr. 532 ~ Harrison Co. Gordon City 0 ~ Howard Co.f Gordon Co. 249 ~ Jay Co. Gwinnett Co Dept. of Corr. 682 ~ Johnson Co. Hall Co. Det. Ctr.a ~ 624 Knox Co. ~ 405 Lake Co.a,f Houston Co.a Jackson Co.d 146 ~ Marion Co. St. Joseph Co. Jeff Davis Co. 44 ~ Jones Co.f 126 ~ Vanderburgh Co.c,e Lamar Co. 90 ~ Iowa Lee Co. 72 ~ Black Hawk Co. Liberty Co. Jail ~ 247 Buena Vista Co. Lowndes Co. 702 ~ Carroll Co. Madison Co. ~ 69 Clinton Co. McDuffie Co. ~ 153 Decatur Co. Mitchell Co. Corr. Inst. ~ 140 Delaware Co. Monroe Co. ~ 134 Emmet Co. Muscogee Co. Prisona,f 568 565 Howard Co. Newton Co. 626 ~ Marshall Co. Pike Co. ~ 3 Scott Co. Jail & Annex Spalding Co. Corr. Inst. ~ 378 Sioux Co. Thomas Co. ~ 210 Kansas Troup Co. 465 ~ Chautauqua Co.a Troup Co. Corr. Inst. ~ 351 Ford Co. Ware Co. 383 ~ Johnson Co.b Idaho Lane Co.b Bonneville Co. 238 288 Linn Co. Canyon Co. 479 ~ Montgomery Co. Idaho Co.b 10 ~ Pratt Co. Kootenai Co. ~ 379 Smith Co. Power Co.a ~ 10 Kentucky Twin Falls Co. 203 ~ Boone Co.b Illinois Boyd Co. Adams Co. ~ 101 Breckinridge Co.b De Kalb Co. ~ 102 Campbell Co.b Casey Co./State Jail Kane Co. 671 615 Kankakee Co.a ~ 506 Christian Co.b Lawrence Co. ~ 19 Clark Co. Det.a McDonough Co. 34 ~ Clay Co. Det. Ctr. Macon Co. 251 ~ Crittenden Co. Monroe Co. 10 ~ Graves Co. Grayson Co. Jail & Annex Rock Island Co. ~ 266 Hardin Co. Det. Ctr.a Saline Co. Law Enforcement & Det. Ctr. 81 ~ Sangamon Co. 340 ~ Laurel Co. Stephenson Co. 134 ~ Pike Co. Vermilion Co. ~ 260 Three Forks Reg. Jail Indiana Webster Co. Adams Co. 65 ~ Louisiana Allen Co. ~ 700 Ascension Parish Jail Avoyelles Parish Bartholomew Co. 154 192 Delaware Co. Justice Ctr. 318 317 Bayou Dorcheat Corr. Ctr.c b Elkhart Co. Security Ctr. (Jail) 747 ~ Bossier Parish 46 Average daily Average daily population, 2008 population, 2007 251 ~ ~ 64 ~ 327 ~ 148 170 ~ 341 ~ ~ 40 ~ 290 ~ 153 923 937 ~ 1,361 650 ~ ~ 708 183 24 ~ 9 5 ~ 8 ~ ~ 8,829 ~ 257 ~ 12 ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 146 295 37 ~ 91 715 2 8 ~ ~ 7 9 ~ 863 ~ ~ 144 15 ~ 448 ~ 191 425 308 632 ~ 235 ~ ~ 580 ~ ~ 300 205 109 ~ 227 ~ 427 ~ 686 8 ~ 12 101 ~ 545 292 ~ ~ 108 258 1,231 ~ 1,262 ~ 1,230 524 ~ Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 24 (continued) Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility Calcasieu Parish Corr. Ctr.a 1,249 1,197 Hennepin Co. Workhouse Caldwell Parish Jails - (3 Facilities)a 318 318 Hennepin Co. Adult Det. Ctr. Catahoula Parish Jail & Det. Fac ~ 22 Itasca Co. De Soto Parish Jail 110 ~ Koochiching Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. East Baton Rouge Prisona 1,671 1,606 Lyon Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. 688 1,125 East Carroll Det. Ctr.a Marshall Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. Evangeline Parish Jail ~ 72 Nobles Co.a Iberia Parish Jailb 485 ~ Olmsted Co. Jefferson Parish Jail ~ 839 Otter Tail Co. Det. Ctr. La Salle Parish Jail ~ 23 Ramsey Co. Corr. Fac. Morehouse Parish Jaila 160 535 Mississippi Morgan City 59 ~ Calhoun Co. New Orleans Parish Prison System 2,570 2,685 Carroll/Montgomery Region Corr. Ctr. Ouachita Parish Corr. Fac. 900 ~ Clarke Co.b Pointe Coupee Parish Det. Ctr. 174 ~ Clay Co. Rapides Parish 272 ~ Harrison Co. Richland Parish Det. Ctr.b 854 840 Hinds Co.a Sherman Walker Corr. Ctr. ~ 298 Holmes-Humphrey Reg. Corr. Fac St. Charles Parish Jail 532 ~ Jackson Co.b St. Landry Parish Jail ~ 23 Jefferson Franklin Corr. Fac. St. Tammany Parish ~ 746 Lafayette Co.a Terrebonne Parish Jail 670 ~ Lauderdale Co. Union Parish Det. Ctr. 360 347 Leake Co. Corr. Fac. Maine Leflore Co. Hancock Co. 44 ~ Rankin Co.a,d Kennebec Co. ~ 170 Walthall Co. Maryland Webster Co. Baltimore Cityb 4,113 3,899 Winstonchoctaw Reg. Corr. Fac. Charles Co. Det. Ctr. 377 ~ Missouri Harford Co. Det. Ctr. 461 400 Arnold Municipal Citya Prince Georges Co. Corr. Ctr. 1,385 1,486 Belton City Worcester Co. 253 ~ Clay Co. Det. Ctr. Massachusetts Douglas Co. Hampshire Co. Jail & House of Corr.b 288 ~ Franklin Co.b Norfolk Co. ~ 702 Greene Co.f Plymouth Co. House of Corr. & Jail 1,516 1,596 Jackson Co. Det. Ctr. Michigan Lincoln Co.a,g Antrim Co. 40 ~ Marion Co. Bay Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. ~ 219 Montgomery Co. Benzie Co. ~ 31 Ozark Co. Calhoun Co. 497 ~ St. Charles Co. Cass Co. ~ 126 Stoddard Co. Emmet Co. 86 ~ Montana 672 685 Ingham Co.b,f Cascade Co. Reg. Jail Kalamazoo Co.b 324 365 Fallon Co.a Kent Co.a 1,307 1,352 Flathead Co. Det. Ctr.c Mecosta Co. ~ 86 Missoula Co. Monroe Co. 328 ~ Pondera Co. Saginaw Co.a ~ 516 Sanders Co. St. Clair Co. 428 408 Nebraska St. Joseph Co. 269 ~ Box Butte Co.b Wayne Co.a 2,185 2,713 Douglas Dept. of Corr. Minnesota Hamilton Co. Anoka Co. 228 ~ Harlan Co. Beltrami Co. ~ 121 Lancaster Co. Dakota Co. ~ 335 Morrill Co. Thayer Co. January 2011 Average daily Average daily population, 2008 population, 2007 ~ 582 728 ~ 83 ~ 14 ~ ~ 30 ~ 10 ~ 57 ~ 280 58 ~ 398 ~ ~ 337 44 ~ 1,160 1,042 379 412 296 ~ ~ 361 125 416 ~ 12 ~ 47 ~ ~ 10 1,150 931 ~ ~ ~ 130 270 373 ~ 58 22 ~ 350 ~ 10 322 ~ 121 539 ~ ~ 6 ~ 16 ~ 65 7 ~ ~ 19 ~ ~ 784 147 ~ 76 ~ 329 ~ 380 ~ ~ 314 6 ~ ~ 1 92 337 ~ 20 16 1,148 ~ ~ 450 ~ 3 ~ 1,041 6 3 474 13 ~ 47 Appendix Table 24 (continued) Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility Nevada Ohio North Las Vegas Det. Corr. Ctr. ~ 869 Butler Co. New Hampshire Clermont Co. Hillsborough Co. House of Corr. 583 ~ Clinton Co. Rockingham Co. Jail & House of Corr. 332 ~ Crawford Co. New Jersey Delaware Co. Bergen Co. Jail & Annex ~ 970 Fayette Co.b Burlington Co. ~ 703 Greene Co. Hamilton Co. Camden Co. Corr. Fac. 1,640 1,608 Cumberland Co. 580 ~ Lorain Co. Mahoning Co. Gloucester Co. 373 ~ Somerset Co. Jail & Annex ~ 324 Miami Co.a Muskingum Co. New Mexico Niles City Catron Co. ~ 4 Noble Co. Curry Co. 37 ~ Richland Co. Dona Ana Co. Det. Ctr. 852 ~ Summit Co. Jail & Glenwood Annexb Lea Co. ~ 299 Oklahoma Luna Co. ~ 392 Carter Co. Roosevelt Co. 79 ~ Comanche Co.a Sandoval Co. 396 ~ Grady Co. San Juan Co. Det. Ctr. ~ 606 Latimer Co. New York Midwest City Albany Co. Corr. Fac. 687 762 79 ~ Muldrow Citya Chenango Co.b b Erie Co. Holding Ctr. 1,364 ~ Muskogee Co. City Det. Ctr. Erie Couny Corr. Fac. ~ 1,469 Oklahoma Co. Jefferson Co. 142 ~ Roger Mills Co. Madison Co.b Rogers Co.b 3 ~ Monroe Co. 1,343 1,450 Stephens Co.a Montgomery Co. ~ 126 Washington Co.f Niagara Co.d 489 ~ Woodward Co. Oneida Co. Corr. Fac. ~ 468 Oregon Onondaga Co. Dept. of Corr. 474 ~ Marion Co.b Rockland Co. Corr. Ctr. ~ 262 Polk Co. Schenectady Co. 305 317 Pennsylvania Allegheny Co.a St. Lawrence Co. ~ 112 Tioga Co. ~ 83 Berks Co. Prison North Carolina Blair Co. Prisond Buncombe Co. 409 475 Bucks Co. Cabarrus Co. ~ 217 Centre Co. Prison Duplin Co. ~ 16 Clearfield Co. Prison Edgecombe Co. 282 260 Erie Co. Forsyth Co. 891 ~ Greene Co. Prison Gaston Co. 541 517 Lebanon Co. Corr. Fac.b Guilford Co. ~ 926 Lehigh Co. Lee Co.a ~ 161 Washington Co. McDowell Co.b 104 ~ South Carolina Moore Co. 129 ~ Abbeville Co. Det. Ctr. Pamlico Co. ~ 87 Aiken Co. Dt. Ctr. Anderson Co. Richmond Co. 86 87 Robeson Co. 377 ~ Beaufort Co. Det. Ctr. Rowan Co. 274 ~ Berkeley Co. Det. Ctr. Vance Co. ~ 153 Charleston Co.a,b Wake Co. 1,331 1,211 Horry Co. Det. Ctr.b b Wilson Co. 220 ~ Pickens Co. North Dakota 171 159 Grand Forks Co. Corr. Ctr.b Pembina Co.f 7 ~ 48 Average daily Average daily population, 2008 population, 2007 1,042 304 19 111 163 52 ~ 2,019 427 561 ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 658 1,101 ~ ~ 112 ~ ~ 381 2,086 450 527 104 154 ~ 20 152 ~ ~ 291 334 100 ~ ~ ~ 2,281 ~ 192 ~ 102 31 185 298 ~ ~ 48 6 287 2,369 17 ~ 108 91 ~ 501 ~ ~ 115 2,749 1,109 304 780 ~ 135 632 ~ 518 1,169 413 2,650 1,304 ~ 1,180 212 ~ ~ 105 538 1,181 ~ 61 422 428 300 ~ 1,694 656 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 362 1,762 ~ 96 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 24 (continued) Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility South Dakota Wichita Co.d Bon Homme Co. ~ 6 Zavala Co. Hughes Co. 48 ~ Utah Meade Co. ~ 45 Beaver Co. Minnehaha Co.a,b 520 520 Cache Co.a Pennington Co. Jail 420 ~ Tooele Co. Winner Cityg ~ 63 Weber Co. Corr. Fac.a b Carroll Co. Virginia 76 74 Accomack Co. Greene Co. 366 ~ Albemarle-Charlottesville Reg. Jailb Lawrence Co. 130 ~ Alexandria City Det. Ctr.b Lincoln Co. 125 ~ Botetourt Co.b Madison Co. Penal Farm ~ 80 Central Virginia Reg. Jail Rutherford Co. 771 ~ Danville City Shelby Co. Corr. Ctr. 2,960 2,960 Danville City Prison Farma,b Sullivan Co. 675 584 Middle River Reg. Jail ~ 616 Sumner Co.a Newport News City Warren Co. 212 ~ 519 ~ Norfolk Municipal Jail Washington Co.d,h Williamson Co.a,b 311 341 Northern Neck Reg. Jail Wilson Co. ~ 250 Patrick Co. Texas Peumansend Creek Reg. Jaila Angelina Co. 258 ~ Rappahannock Co. Bell Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. 672 ~ Rappahannock Reg. Jail & Annexb Brazos Co. 553 ~ Roanoke Co. Caldwell Co. ~ 168 Rockingham Reg. Jail Cameron Co.a 100 971 Virginia Peninsula Reg. Jail Collin Co. 897 ~ Washington Denton Co. Det. Ctr. 1,121 1,065 Asotin Co. Ector Co.a,b 583 594 Benton Co. Edwards Co. 9 ~ Buckley Cityb El Paso Co. Det. Fac. 2,209 2,220 Kent Citya Guadalupe Co. Det. Ctr. 378 460 Kirkland City Hays Co. 315 ~ Skagit Co. Hidalgo Co. Adult Det. Ctr.a,b 1,132 1,185 Spokane Co. Geiger Corr. Ctr. Hood Co. 161 ~ Whatcom Co. Jasper Co. Law Enforcement Ctr. ~ 62 West Virginia Jefferson Co. Det. Ctr.a 924 1,176 Marshall Co. Northern Reg. Jail & Corr. Complex Lipscomb Co. ~ 2 North Central Reg. Jail Lubbock Co. 724 1,000 Tygart Valley Reg. Jail McLennan Co. 869 860 Western Reg. Jailg Maverick Co. ~ 230 Wisconsin ~ 280 Adams Co. Midland Co.a Mills Co. 7 ~ Barron Co. Justice Ctr. Montgomery Co. 815 1,112 Brown Co.a Nueces Co. 950 ~ Burnett Co. Law Enforcement Ctr.b Parker Co.b 310 ~ Dane Co. Randall Co. ~ 272 Dodge Co. Rusk Co.b 89 88 Eau Claire Co. San Patricio Co. 192 ~ Ozaukee Co. Shelby Co. ~ 51 Racine Co.b a Sherman Co. ~ 2 Richland Co. Tarrant Co.c 3,333 3,377 Rock Co. Tom Green Co. ~ 415 Shawano Co.b Upton Co. 38 ~ Waukesha Co. Victoria Co.b 450 ~ Walker Co. ~ 130 January 2011 Average daily Average daily population, 2008 population, 2007 435 435 9 ~ 370 ~ ~ 973 ~ 306 119 770 ~ 520 540 91 372 ~ 149 651 629 1,638 451 27 275 ~ 1,017 286 ~ ~ 113 538 ~ ~ 395 208 164 ~ ~ 1,727 ~ ~ 288 16 1,003 ~ 295 489 ~ 672 22 ~ ~ 237 510 428 47 ~ ~ 139 7 ~ 562 ~ ~ 517 356 ~ 314 ~ ~ 461 ~ ~ ~ 30 926 462 ~ ~ 788 ~ ~ 510 655 64 123 770 ~ ~ 463 274 220 ~ 27 521 ~ ~ 49 Appendix Table 24 (continued) Local jail authorities with no reported allegations of staff-on inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Wyoming Fremont Co. ~ 166 Laramie Co. 222 ~ Natrona Co. Det. Ctr.a ~ 297 Platte Co. 97 ~ Sheridan Co. 90 ~ ~ 119 Sweetwater Co.a ~ Not applicable. Facility not sampled in survey year. aAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2007. bAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2008. cJurisdiction did not record allegations of staff sexual harassment in 2007. dJurisdiction did not record allegations of staff sexual harassment in 2008. eJurisdiction did not record allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2007. fCounts of staff sexual misconduct in 2008 are based on substantiated allegations only. gCounts of staff sexual misconduct in 2007 are based on substantiated allegations only. hJurisdiction did not record allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2008. 50 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 25 Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by private prison and jail authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Average Reported inmate-on-inmate Reported inmate-on-inmate Average Reported inmate-on-inmate Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts daily daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Total / 56 6 14 4 / 58 6 27 0 Arizona Eloy Det. Ctr. (CCA) 1,456 0 0 1 0 1,449 3 0 1 0 Colorado Bent Co. Corr. Fac. (CCA) 847 1 0 1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ High Plains Corr. Fac. (GRW/CCI)a,b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 244 8 0 19 0 Florida Bay Corr. Inst. (CCA) 25 2 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lake City Corr. Fac.(CCA) 906 4 0 0 0 891 3 0 0 0 South Bay Corr. Fac. (GEO)c 1,858 4 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Georgia Coffee Corr. Fac.(CCA)c,d 1,691 ~ ~ / / 1,690 10 0 / / D. Ray James Prison 1,796 0 0 2 0 1,728 0 0 0 0 Wheeler Corr. Fac. (CCA)d,e 1,692 1 0 / / 1,680 3 0 / / Idaho Idaho Corr. Fac. (CCA)c 1,493 0 0 / / 1,464 0 0 1 0 Illinois Substance Abuse Services-Marion (FWHS) 39 0 0 1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Kansas Leavenworth Det. Ctr. (CCA) 1,057 1 0 0 0 962 0 0 0 0 Kentucky Lee Adjustment Ctr. (CCA) 684 2 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Louisiana Allen Corr. Ctr. (GEO)b 1,469 0 0 0 0 1,530 2 0 0 0 Mississippi East Mississippi Corr. Fac.(GEO) 950 2 0 2 1 870 2 1 0 0 Tallahatchie Co. Corr. Fac. (CCA) 1,685 0 0 0 0 1,500 5 0 2 0 Walnut Grove Youth Corr. Fac. (CCI) 1,019 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Montana Helena Pre-Release Ctr. (BACS) 92 1 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ New Mexico Lea Co. Corr. Fac. (GEO)f 1,238 1 0 0 0 1,240 0 0 0 0 Ohio Oriana House, Inc. 16 2 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Oklahoma Cimarron Corr. Fac. (CCA) 993 5 2 0 0 1,021 6 3 0 0 David L. Moss Criminal Justice Ctr.g 1,425 1 1 3 3 1,517 0 0 0 0 Davis Corr. Fac.(CCA) 1,062 6 0 1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Diamondback Corr. Fac. (CCA) 2,150 1 0 0 0 2,093 0 0 0 0 Lawton Corr. Fac. (GEO)e 2,480 8 2 / / 2,498 8 0 2 0 Tennessee Hardeman Co. Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 1,963 2 0 0 0 1,962 0 0 0 0 South Central Ctr. (CCA) 1,633 4 0 2 0 1,642 5 1 2 0 Whiteville Corr. Fac. (CCA)c 1,489 2 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Texas Big Spring Corr. Ctr. (CCI)c,d 3,389 0 0 / / 2,835 2 1 / / Bradshaw State Jail (CCA)c 1,970 3 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dalby Corr. Ctr. (MTC) 1,875 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Eden Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 1,495 0 0 0 0 1,540 1 0 0 0 January 2011 51 Appendix Table 25 (continued) Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by private prison and jail authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Average Reported inmate-on-inmate Reported inmate-on-inmate Average Reported inmate-on-inmate Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts daily daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Virginia Lawrenceville Corr. Ctr. (GEO) 1,557 1 0 1 0 1,554 0 0 0 0 ~Not applicable. /Not reported. BACS—Boyd Andrew Community Services CCA—Corrections Corp. of America CCI—Cornell Companies, Inc. FWHS—Franklin-Williamson Human Services, Inc. GEO—The GEO Group, Inc. MTC—Management & Training Corp. SMBH—Southeast Missouri Behavioral Health aCornell Companies, Inc. took over management of the Brush Correctional Facility from GRW Corporation in May 2007. It was renamed High Plains Correctional Facility. bCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007 are based on substantiated allegations only. cAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008. dAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007. eFacility did not record allegations of abusive sexual contact in 2008. fCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008 are based on completed acts only. gFacility is currently operated locally. 52 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 26 Private prison and jail authorities with no reported allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 Arizona New Jersey Arizona State Prison - Florence West (GEO) 698 ~ Bo Robinson Education & Training Ctr. (CEC) ~ Arizona State Prison - Kingman (MTC) 1,490 ~ Hope Hall (VOA)c 170 Arizona State Prison - Phoenix West (GEO) 479 512 Talbot Hall (CEC) 499 California New Mexico 2,621 692 Cibola Co. Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 1,138 California City Corr. Ctr. (CCA)a,b Central Valley Community Corr. Fac. (GEO) 585 600 Dismas Charities - Las Cruces (DCI) 73 Desert View Community Corr. Fac. (GEO) 584 ~ New Mexico Women’s Corr. Fac. (CCA)c 563 Taft Corr. Inst. (MTC)a 2,355 2,316 Valencia Co. Adult Det. Ctr. - Cornell Corr. ~ Colorado North Carolina Crowley Co. Corr. Fac.(CCA)c 1,630 ~ Rivers Corr. Inst. (GEO) 1,298 Kit Carson Co. Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 960 749 Ohio Phoenix Ctr. Adams Co. Community Corr. (CEC)c 228 ~ Alvis House Cope Ctr.e ~ Tooley Hall (CEC) 59 ~ Lake Erie Corr. Inst. (MTC) 1,484 Women’s Remediation Ctr. (CC)c 308 ~ N.E. Ohio Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 1,982 Connecticut North Coast Corr. Treatment Fac. (MTC) ~ Berman Treatment Ctr. (CSI) 17 ~ Oklahoma Florida Carver Corr. Ctr. (ACS) 277 Citrus Co. Det. Fac. (CCA) 646 ~ Catalyst Behavioral Services - Ivanhoe 102 Gadsden Corr. Fac. (CCA) 137 1,273 Great Plains Corr. Fac. (CCI) 1,153 Hillsborough Co. (CSC) 92 ~ Pennsylvania Moore Haven Corr. Fac. (GEO) 15 ~ Kintock - Philadelphia 338 McRae Corr. Fac. (CCA) 1,724 ~ Tennessee Illinois Salvation Army Ctr. 47 Southwood Interventions (CCI)a ~ 101 Texas Kentucky B.M. Moore Corr. Ctr. (MTC) 499 Dismas Charities-Portland (DCI) 218 ~ Bartlett (CCA) 1,046 Marion Adjustment Ctr. (CCA)a ~ 790 Bridgeport Corr. Ctr. (GEO) 519 Louisiana Bridgeport PPT (CCA) 200 C.I.N.C., Inc. 180 ~ Country Rehab. Ctr., Inc. of Tyler ~ Winn Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 1,461 ~ Dawson State Jail (CCA) 2,188 Minnesota Estes Unit (MTC) 1,036 Prairie Corr. Fac. (CCA)c 1,413 ~ Kyle Unit (CEC) 519 Mississippi Liberty Co. Jail (CEC) 318 Delta Corr. Fac.(CCA) 968 970 Limestone Co. Det. Ctr. (CEC)c 1,005 Wilkinson Co. Corr. Ctr.(CCA) 988 ~ Lindsey State Jail (CCA) 1,027 Missouri Lockhart PPT (GEO) ~ S.E. Missouri Comm. Treatment Ctr. (SMBH)c 38 ~ Mineral Wells PPT (CCA) 2,056 Montana Reeves Co. Det. Ctr. (GEO)c,f 2,175 c Alpha House (AI) 158 ~ Reeves Co. Det. Ctr. III 1,350 Willacy Co. State Jail (CCA) 1,065 ACS—Avalon Correctional Services, Inc. CEC—Community Education Centers, Inc. AI—Alternatives, Inc. CSC—Correctional Services Corp. CC—ComCor, Inc. CSI—Community Solutions, Inc. CCA—Corrections Corp. of America DCI—Dismas Charities, Inc. CCI—Cornell Companies, Inc. GEO—The GEO Group, Inc. ~Not applicable. aAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007. bFacility did not record allegations of abusive sexual contact in 2008. cAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008. dFacility is currently closed. eCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007 are based on substantiated allegations only. fCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008 are based on substantiated allegations only. January 2011 Average daily population, 2007 495 ~ ~ ~ ~ 576 163 ~ 22 ~ ~ 649 ~ 92 ~ 337 ~ ~ 1,003 518 ~ 46 2,182 ~ ~ ~ 997 ~ 997 2,085 2,147 ~ 1,059 MTC—Management & Training Corp. SMBH—Southeast Missouri Behavioral Health VOA—Volunteers of America - Delaware Valley 53 Appendix Table 27 Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by private prison and jail authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported allegations of Reported allegations of Reported allegations of Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment staff sexual misconduct staff sexual harassment Average staff sexual misconduct Average with inmates of inmates with inmates of inmates daily daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Total / 59 20 8 1 / 29 7 5 0 Arizona Eloy Det. Ctr. (CCA) 1,456 2 0 0 0 1,449 1 0 0 0 California Taft Corr. Inst. (MTC)a 2,355 1 0 0 0 2,316 0 0 / / Colorado Crowley Co. Corr. Fac.(CCA) 1,630 4 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ High Plains Corr. Fac. (GRW/CCI)b,c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 244 1 0 0 0 Kit Carson Co. Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 960 0 0 0 0 749 4 0 1 0 Florida Gadsden Corr. Fac. (CCA) 137 3 1 0 0 1,273 0 0 0 0 Lake City Corr. Fac.(CCA) 906 1 0 0 0 891 1 1 0 0 15 1 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Moore Haven Corr. Fac. (GEO)d South Bay Corr. Fac. (GEO) 1,858 1 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Georgia Coffee Corr. Fac.(CCA) 1,691 1 0 1 0 1,690 0 0 0 0 D. Ray James Prisona 1,796 3 0 1 0 1,728 0 0 / / McRae Corr. Fac. (CCA) 1,724 1 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Idaho Idaho Corr. Fac. (CCA) 1,493 1 0 0 0 1,464 1 0 0 0 Illinois Substance Abuse Services-Marion (FWHS) 39 2 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Kansas Leavenworth Det. Ctr. (CCA) 1,057 2 1 0 0 962 0 0 0 0 Kentucky Lee Adjustment Ctr. (CCA) 684 4 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Marion Adjustment Ctr. (CCA)a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 790 2 1 / / Louisiana Winn Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 1,461 3 3 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Minnesota Prairie Corr. Fac. (CCA)d 1,413 1 1 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Mississippi Delta Corr. Fac.(CCA) 968 1 0 0 0 970 1 1 2 0 Marshall Co. Corr. Fac. (GEO)e 900 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Wilkinson Co. Corr. Ctr.(CCA) 988 2 0 2 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ New Mexico New Mexico Women’s Corr. Fac. (CCA) 563 4 0 1 1 576 0 0 0 0 North Carolina Rivers Corr. Inst. (GEO) 1,298 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ohio Lake Erie Corr. Inst. (MTC) 1,484 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N.E. Ohio Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 1,982 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Oklahoma Catalyst Behavioral Services - Ivanhoe 102 0 0 0 0 92 1 0 0 0 David L. Moss Criminal Justice Ctr.a,f 1,425 1 1 0 0 1,517 2 0 / / Diamondback Corr. Fac. (CCA) 2,150 2 2 0 0 2,093 2 2 1 0 Lawton Corr. Fac. (GEO)d 2,480 1 0 / / 2,498 2 0 0 0 Pennsylvania Kintock - Philadelphiad 338 0 0 / / 337 2 0 0 0 Tennessee South Central Ctr. (CCA) 1,633 3 1 0 0 1,642 2 1 0 0 Whiteville Corr. Fac. (CCA) 1,489 1 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 54 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix table 27 (continued) Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported by private prison and jail authorities, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported allegations of Reported allegations of Reported allegations of Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment staff sexual misconduct staff sexual harassment Average staff sexual misconduct Average with inmates of inmates with inmates of inmates daily daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Texas Big Spring Corr. Ctr. (CCI)a 3,389 3 3 0 0 2,835 2 1 / / Eden Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 1,495 2 1 0 0 1,540 0 0 0 0 Liberty Co. Jail (CEC) 318 2 2 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Virginia Lawrenceville Corr. Ctr. (GEO) 1,557 2 0 3 0 1,554 5 0 1 0 ~Not applicable. /Not reported. CCA—Corrections Corp. of America CCI—Cornell Companies, Inc. CEC—Community Education Centers, Inc. GEO—The GEO Group, Inc. aAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2007. bCornell Companies, Inc. took over management of the Brush Correctional Facility from GRW Corporation in May 2007. It was renamed High Plains Correctional Facility. cCounts of staff sexual misconduct in 2007 are based on substantiated allegations only. dAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2008. eFacility is currently closed. fFacility is currently operated locally. January 2011 55 Appendix Table 28 Private prison and jail authorities with no reported allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization, 2007-2008 Average daily Average daily Jurisdiction and facility population, 2008 population, 2007 Jurisdiction and facility Arizona New Mexico Arizona State Prison - Florence West (GEO) 698 ~ Cibola Co. Corr. Ctr (CCA) Arizona State Prison - Kingman (MTC) 1,490 ~ Dismas Charities-Las Cruces (DCI) Arizona State Prison - Phoenix West (GEO) 479 512 Lea Co. Corr. Fac. (GEO) California Valencia Co. Adult Det. Ctr. - Cornell Corr. California City Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 2,621 692 Ohio Central Valley Community Corr. Fac. (GEO) 585 600 Alvis House Cope Ctr. Desert View Community Corr. Fac. (GEO) 584 ~ North Coast Corr. Treatment Fac. (MTC) Colorado Oriana House, Inc. Bent Co. Corr. Fac. (CCA) 847 ~ Oklahoma Phoenix Ctr. Adams Co. Comm. Corr. (CEC)a 228 ~ Carver Corr. Ctr. (ACS)a,c Tooley Hall (CEC) 59 ~ Cimarron Corr. Fac. (CCA) Women’s Remediation Ctr. (CC) 308 ~ Davis Corr. Fac.(CCA) Connecticut Great Plains Corr. Fac. (CCI) Berman Treatment Ctr. (CSI) 17 ~ Pennsylvania Florida George W. Hill Corr. Fac. (CEC) Bay Corr. Inst. (CCA) 25 ~ Tennessee Citrus Co. Det. Fac. (CCA) 646 ~ Hardeman Co. Corr. Ctr. (CCA) Hillsborough Co. (CSC) 92 ~ Salvation Army Ctr. Georgia Texas Wheeler Corr. Fac. (CCA)a,b 1,692 1,680 B.M. Moore Corr. Ctr. (MTC) Illinois Bartlett (CCA) Southwood Interventions (CCI)b ~ 101 Bradshaw State Jail (CCA)a Kentucky Bridgeport PPT (CCA) Dismas Charities-Portland (DCI) 218 ~ Country Rehab. Ctr., Inc. of Tylerb Louisiana Dalby Corr. Ctr. (MTC) Allen Corr. Ctr. (GEO) 1,469 1,530 Dawson State Jail (CCA) C.I.N.C., Inc. 180 ~ Estes Unit (MTC) Mississippi Houston/Reid Facility (CCI)a East Mississippi Corr. Fac.(GEO) 950 870 Kyle Unit (CEC) Tallahatchie Co. Corr. Fac. (CCA) 1,685 1,500 Limestone Co. Det. Ctr. (CEC)a Walnut Grove Youth Corr. Fac. (CCI) 1,019 ~ Lindsey State Jail (CCA) Missouri Lockhart PPT (GEO) Southeast Missouri Comm. Treatment Ctr. (SMBH) 38 ~ Mineral Wells PPT (CCA) Montana Reeves Co. Det. Ctr. (GEO) Alpha House (AI)a 158 ~ Reeves Co. Det. Ctr. III Helena Pre-Release Ctr. (BACS)a 92 ~ Willacy Co. State Jail (CCA) New Jersey Bo Robinson Education & Training Ctr. (CEC)b ~ 495 Hope Hall (VOA) 170 ~ Talbot Hall (CEC) 499 ~ ACS—Avalon Correctional Services, Inc. AI—Alternatives, Inc. BACS—Boyd Andrew Community Services CC—ComCor, Inc. CCA—Corrections Corp. of America CCI—Cornell Companies, Inc. CEC—Community Education Centers, Inc CSC—Correctional Services Corp. CSI—Community Solutions, Inc. DCI—Dismas Charities, Inc. Average daily Average daily population, 2008 population, 2007 1,138 73 1,238 ~ ~ ~ 1,240 163 ~ ~ 16 22 649 ~ 277 993 1,062 1,153 ~ 1,021 ~ ~ ~ 1,877 1,963 47 1,962 ~ 499 1,046 1,970 519 ~ 1,875 2,188 1,036 306 519 1,005 1,027 ~ 2,056 2,175 1,350 1,065 ~ 1,003 ~ 518 46 ~ 2,182 ~ ~ ~ 997 ~ 997 2,085 2,147 ~ 1,059 GEO—The GEO Group, Inc. MTC—Management & Training Corp. SMBH—Southeast Missouri Behavioral Health VOA—Volunteers of America - Delaware Valley ~Not applicable. aAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2008. bAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2007. cCounts of staff sexual misconduct in 2008 are based on substantiated allegations only. 56 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 29 Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization reported in other correctional facilties, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-oninmate nonconsensual inmate abusive inmate nonconsensual inmate abusive Average Average sexual acts sexual contacts sexual acts sexual contacts daily daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated U.S. Military Total 1,798 1 0 1 1 1,844 0 0 1 0 Air Force 40 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 Army 811 1 0 0 0 974 0 0 0 0 Marines 431 0 0 0 0 381 0 0 1 0 Navy 516 0 0 1 1 436 0 0 0 0 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 607 0 0 / / 543 0 0 0 0 ICE - Florence (AZ)a ICE - El Centro (CA)a,b 470 0 0 / / 454 0 0 / / ICE - San Diego (CA) 662 1 0 0 0 671 1 0 0 0 ICE - Aurora (CO) 388 1 1 0 0 397 0 0 0 0 ICE - Broward Transitional Ctr. (FL) 581 0 0 0 0 . . . . . ICE - Miami (FL) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 677 0 0 0 0 ICE - Stewart Det. Ctr. (GA)a 1,670 0 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ICE - Elizabeth (NJ) 258 0 0 0 0 270 0 0 0 0 ICE - Batavia (NY) 554 0 0 0 0 504 0 0 0 0 ICE - Varick Federal Det. Fac. (NY) 225 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ICE - Aguadilla (PR) ~ ~ ~ 40 0 0 0 0 800 0 0 0 0 800 0 0 / / ICE - El Paso (TX)b ICE - Houston (TX)c 836 0 0 0 0 853 0 0 0 0 ICE - Laredo (TX) 341 0 0 0 0 369 0 0 0 0 ICE - Port Isabel Service Processing Ctr. (TX) 700 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ICE - South Texas Det. Fac. (TX) 1,803 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ICE - Willacy Det. Ctr. (TX) 1,451 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 956 0 0 / / 980 0 0 0 0 ICE - Tacoma (WA)a Jails in Indian Country Colorado River Indian Tribes Adult Det. Ctr. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 38 0 0 0 0 Gila River Dept. of Rehab. & Supervision - Adult (AZ) 167 0 0 0 0 186 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Navajo Nation - Chinle (AZ)a Navajo Nation - Kayenta Police Dept. & Holding Fac. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 0 0 0 0 Navajo Nation - Shiprock Police Dept. & Adult Det. (AZ)a 77 0 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Navajo Nation - Window Rock Adult Det. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 21 0 0 0 0 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Dept. of Corr. - Adult & Juv. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 65 0 0 0 0 San Carlos Dept. of Corr. & Rehabilitation - Adult (AZ) 107 0 0 0 0 1,284 0 0 0 0 Supai Law Enforcement & Holding Fac. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 Tohono O’Odham Tribe Adult Det. Ctr. (AZ) 145 0 0 0 0 145 0 0 0 0 Truxton Canyon Adult Det. Ctr. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 102 0 0 0 0 White Mountain Apache Det. Ctr. (AZ) 65 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 Chief Ignacio Justice Ctr. Adult Det. (CO) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 41 0 0 0 0 Fort Hall Police Dept. & Adult Det. Ctr. (ID) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 19 0 0 0 0 Saginaw Chippewa Tribal Police Dept. & Adult Det. Ctr. (MI) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 Red Lake Tribal Justice Ctr. Adult Det. (MN) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 38 0 0 0 0 Choctaw Justice Complex Adult Det. (MS) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 35 0 0 0 0 Blackfeet Adult Det. Ctr. (MT) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 22 0 0 0 0 Crow Adult Det. Ctr. (MT) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 0 0 / / Flathead Adult Det. Ctr. (MT)b Fort Peck Police Dept. & Adult Det. Ctr. (MT) 28 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Northern Cheyenne Adult Det. Ctr. (MT) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 35 0 0 0 0 Omaha Tribal Police Dept. & Adult Det. (MT) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 22 0 0 0 0 Acoma Tribal Police & Holding Fac. (NM) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 0 0 0 0 Jicarilla Apache Police Dept. (NM) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 27 0 0 0 0 Navajo Nation - Crownpoint Adult Det. (NM) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 14 0 0 0 0 Navajo Nation - Shiprock Police Dept. & Adult Det. (NM) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 36 0 0 0 0 Zuni Adult Det. Ctr. (NM) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 23 0 0 0 0 Fort Totten L.E. & Adult Det. Ctr. (ND) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 0 0 0 0 Gerald Tex Fox Justice Ctr. Adult Det. (ND) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 0 0 0 0 Standing Rock L.E. & Adult Det. (ND) 45 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ January 2011 57 Appendix Table 29 (continued) Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization reported in other correctional facilties, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-onReported inmate-oninmate nonconsensual inmate abusive inmate nonconsensual inmate abusive Average Average sexual acts sexual contacts sexual acts sexual contacts daily daily Jurisdiction and facility population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated population Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Jails in Indian Country (continued) Turtle Mountain L.E. & Adult Det. (ND)a 25 0 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Warm Springs Police Dept. & Adult Det. Ctr. (OR) 51 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 Cheyenne River Sioux Adult Det. Ctr. (SD) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 35 0 0 / / Kyle Police Dept. & Adult Det. (SD)b Lower Brule Justice Ctr. - Adult Det. (SD) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 0 0 0 0 Oglala Sioux Tribal Offenders Fac. (SD) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 85 0 0 0 0 Rosebud Sioux Tribe Police Dept. & Adult Det. (SD) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 56 0 0 0 0 Chehalis Tribal Police Dept. & Adult Det. Ctr. (WA) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 10 0 0 0 0 Colville Adult Det. Ctr. (WA) 30 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 Makah Public Safety-Adult Det. (WA) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 0 0 0 0 Nisqually Adult Corrections (WA)a 57 0 0 / / 65 0 0 0 0 Puyallup Tribal Law Enforcement & Adult Det. (WA)b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 0 0 / / Quinault Nation Police Dept. & Holding Fac. (WA) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 0 0 0 0 Spokane Adult Det. Ctr. (WA) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 17 0 0 0 0 Menominee Police Dept. & Det. Ctr. (WI) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 48 0 0 0 0 Wind River Adult Det. Ctr. (WY) 15 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 ~Not applicable. /Not reported. aAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008. bAllegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2007. cCounts of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2008 are based on substantiated allegations only. 58 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 Appendix Table 30 Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported in other correctional facilties, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported allegations of Reported allegations of Reported allegations of Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct staff sexual harassment staff sexual misconduct staff sexual harassment with inmates of inmates with inmates of inmates Jurisdiction and facility Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated U.S. Military Total 4 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 Air Force 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Army 4 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 Marines 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Navy 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ICE - Florence (AZ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ICE - El Centro (CA)a,b 0 0 / / 0 0 / / ICE - San Diego (CA) 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 ICE - Aurora (CO) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ICE - Broward Transitional Ctr. (FL) 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ICE - Miami (FL) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ICE - Stewart Det. Ctr. (GA)b 0 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ICE - Elizabeth (NJ) 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ICE - Batavia (NY) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ICE - Varick Federal Det. Fac. (NY) 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ICE - Aguadilla (PR)a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 / / ICE - El Paso (TX) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ICE - Houston (TX)c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ICE - Laredo (TX) 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 ICE - Port Isabel Service Processing Ctr. (TX) 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ICE - South Texas Det. Fac. (TX) 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ICE - Willacy Det. Ctr. (TX) 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ICE - Tacoma (WA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jails in Indian Country Colorado River Indian Tribes Adult Det. Ctr. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Gila River Dept. of Rehab. & Supervision - Adult (AZ) 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ Navajo Nation - Chinle (AZ)b Navajo Nation - Kayenta Police Dept. & Holding Fac. (AZ)a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 / / Navajo Nation - Shiprock Police Dept. & Adult Det. (AZ)b 0 0 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ Navajo Nation - Window Rock Adult Det. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Dept. of Corr. - Adult & Juv. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 San Carlos Dept. of Corr. & Rehabilitation - Adult (AZ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supai Law Enforcement & Holding Fac. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Tohono O’Odham Tribe Adult Det. Ctr. (AZ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Truxton Canyon Adult Det. Ctr. (AZ) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 White Mountain Apache Det. Ctr. (AZ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chief Ignacio Justice Ctr. Adult Det. (CO) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Fort Hall Police Dept. & Adult Det. Ctr. (ID) ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 0 0 0 Saginaw Chippewa Tribal Police Dept. & Adult Det Ctr. (MI) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Red Lake Tribal Justice Ctr. Adult Det. (MN) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Choctaw Justice Complex Adult Det. (MS) ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 2 0 0 Blackfeet Adult Det. Ctr. (MT) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Crow Adult Det. Ctr. (MT) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Flathead Adult Det. Ctr. (MT)a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 / / Fort Peck Police Dept. & Adult Det. Ctr. (MT) 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Northern Cheyenne Adult Det. Ctr. (MT) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Omaha Tribal Police Dept. & Adult Det. (MT) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Acoma Tribal Police & Holding Fac. (NM) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Jicarilla Apache Police Dept. (NM) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Navajo Nation - Crownpoint Adult Det. (NM) ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 0 0 0 Navajo Nation - Shiprock Police Dept. & Adult Det. (NM) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 January 2011 59 Appendix table 30 (continued) Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization reported in other correctional facilties, by year and type of victimization, 2007-2008 2008 2007 Reported allegations of Reported allegations of Reported allegations of Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct staff sexual harassment staff sexual misconduct staff sexual harassment with inmates of inmates with inmates of inmates Jurisdiction and facility Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Allegations Substantiated Jails in Indian Country (continued) Zuni Adult Det. Ctr. (NM) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Fort Totten L.E. & Adult Det. Ctr. (ND)a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 / / Gerald Tex Fox Justice Ctr. Adult Det. (ND) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Standing Rock L.E. & Adult Det. (ND) 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Turtle Mountain L.E. Adult Det. (ND) 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Warm Springs Police Dept. & Adult Det. Ctr. (OR) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Cheyenne River Sioux Adult Det. Ctr. (SD) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Kyle Police Dept. & Adult Det. (SD)a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 / / Lower Brule Justice Ctr. - Adult Det. (SD) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Oglala Sioux Tribal Offenders Fac. (SD) ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 0 0 Rosebud Sioux Tribe Police Dept. & Adult Det. (SD) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Chehalis Tribal Police Dept. & Adult Det. Ctr. (WA) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Colville Adult Det. Ctr. (WA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Makah Public Safety-Adult Det. (WA) ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 2 1 1 Nisqually Adult Corrections (WA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Puyallup Tribal Law Enforcement & Adult Det. (WA)a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 / / Quinault Nation Police Dept. & Holding Fac. (WA) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Spokane Adult Det. Ctr. (WA) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Menominee Police Dept. & Det. Ctr. (WI) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Wind River Adult Det. Ctr. (WY) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~Not applicable. /Not reported. aAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2007. bAllegations of staff sexual harassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct in 2008. cCounts of staff sexual misconduct in 2008 are based on substantiated allegations only. 60 Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2007–2008 January 2011 61 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics ncj231172 Washington, DC 20531 PRESORTED STANDARD POSTAGE & FEES PAID DOJ/BJS Permit No. G-91 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 Office of Justice Programs • Innovation • Partnerships • Safer Neighborhoods • http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov The Bureau of Justice Statistics is the statistical agency of the U.S. Department of Justice. James P. Lynch is Director. This Special Report was written by Paul Guerino under the supervision of Allen J. Beck. Ebony Nicholson, Kyle Harbacek, and Allina Boutilier verified this report. Brian R. Higgins (Lockheed Martin) and Jill Duncan edited the report, Barbara Quinn produced the report, and Jayne Robinson prepared the report for final printing under the supervision of Doris J. James. January 2011, NCJ 231172 This report in portable document format and in ASCII and its related statistical data and tables are available at the BJS website: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index. cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2204.