Exposed

D I D Y O U K N O W ? Corporations VOTED to adopt this. Through ALEC, global companies

ALEC EXPOSED
Search

ABOUT

GO

MEMBERS

LOGIN | LOGOUT | HOME | JOIN ALEC | CONTACT
work as “equals” in “unison” with politicians
to write laws to govern your life. Big
MODEL LEGISLATION
ALEC INITIATIVES
PUBLICATIONS
Business
has “a VOICE TASK
and aFORCES
VOTE,” according
to newly exposed
documents. DO YOU?

EVENTS & MEETINGS

“ALEC”
NEWShas long been a
secretive collaboration
between
BigLegislation
Business and
Model
“conservative” politicians.
Civil Justice
Behind closed doors, they
ghostwrite
“model”
bills to
Commerce,
Insurance,
and Economic
be introduced
in state
Development
capitols
across the country.
This agenda--underwritten
Education
by global corporations-Energy,
includes
majorEnvironment,
tax
and Agriculture
loopholes
for big industries
and the
super rich,
Federal Relations
proposals to offshore U.S.
Health
Human
jobs and
gut and
minimum
wage,Services
and efforts to
weaken public health,
International Relations
safety, and environmental
protections.
Public Although
Safety andmany
Elections
of these
bills have become
law, until now, their origin
Tax and Fiscal Policy
has been largely unknown.
With ALEC
EXPOSED, the
Telecommunications
Centerand
forInformation
Media and
Technology
Democracy
hopes more
Americans will study the
bills to understand
the
Print this Page
depth and breadth of how
Text-Only Page
big corporations are
Email
this Page
changing the
legal
rules
and undermining democracy
across the nation.

ALEC’s’Corporate Board
--in recent past or present

• AT&T Services, Inc.
• centerpoint360
• UPS
• Bayer Corporation
• GlaxoSmithKline
• Energy Future Holdings
• Johnson & Johnson
• Coca-Cola Company
• PhRMA
• Kraft Foods, Inc.
• Coca-Cola Co.
• Pfizer Inc.
• Reed Elsevier, Inc.
• DIAGEO
• Peabody Energy
• Intuit, Inc.
• Koch Industries, Inc.
• ExxonMobil
• Verizon
• Reynolds American Inc.
• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
• Salt River Project
• Altria Client Services, Inc.
• American Bail Coalition
• State Farm Insurance
For more on these corporations,
search at www.SourceWatch.org.

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

Home

Model Legislation

Public Safety and Elections

Drug Dealer Liability Act
Summary

Did you know the
NRA--the National
Rifle Association-was the corporate
co-chair in 2011?

This Act would provide an action for civil damages against persons who cause injury by
their participation in the illegal drug market. The Act would also prescribe the parties
and procedures regarding civil action.

Model Legislation
{Title, enacting clause, etc.}
Section 1. {Title.} This Act may be cited as the Drug Dealer Liability Act.
Section 2. {Statement of purpose.} The purpose of this Act is to provide a civil

remedy for damages to persons in a community injured as a result of illegal drug use.
These persons include parents, employers, insurers, governmental entities, and others
who pay for drug treatment or employee assistance programs, as well as infants injured
as a result of exposure to drugs in utero ("drug babies"). The Act will enable them to
recover damages from those persons in the community who have joined the illegal drug
market. A further purpose of the Act is to shift, to the extent possible, the cost of the
damage caused by the existence of the illegal drug market in a community to those who
illegally profit from that market. The further purpose of the Act is to establish the
prospect of substantial monetary loss as a deterrent to those who have not yet entered
into the illegal drug distribution market. The further purpose is to establish an incentive
for drug users to identify and seek payment for their own drug treatment from those
dealers who have sold drugs to the user in the past.

Section 3. {Legislative findings.} The legislature finds and declares all of the
following:

(A) Every community in the country is affected by the marketing and distribution of
illegal drugs. A vast amount of state and local resources are expended in coping with the
financial, physical, and emotional toll that results from the existence of the illegal drug
market. Families, employers, insurers, and society in general bear the substantial costs
of coping with the marketing of illegal drugs. Drug babies and parents, particularly those
of adolescent illegal drug users, suffer significant non-economic injury as well.
(B) Although the criminal justice system is an important weapon against the illegal drug
market, the civil justice system can and must also be used. The civil justice system can
provide an avenue of compensation for those who have suffered harm as a result of the
marketing and distribution of illegal drugs. The persons who have joined the illegal drug
market should bear the cost of the harm caused by that market in the community.
(C) The threat of liability under this Act serves as an additional deterrent to a
recognizable segment of the illegal drug network. A person who has non-drug-related
assets, who markets illegal drugs at the workplace, who encourages friends to become
users, among others, is likely to decide that the added cost of entering the market is not
worth the benefit. This is particularly true for a first-time, casual dealer who has not yet
made substantial profits. This Act provides a mechanism for the cost of the injury caused
by illegal drug use to be borne by those who benefit from illegal drug dealing.
(D) This Act imposes liability against all participants in the illegal drug market, including
small dealers, particularly those in the workplace, who are not usually the focus of
criminal investigations. The small dealers increase the number of users and are the
people who become large dealers. These small dealers are most likely to be deterred by
the threat of liability.
(E) A parent of an adolescent illegal drug user often expends considerable financial
resources, typically in the tens of thousands of dollars, for the child's drug treatment.
Local and state governments provide drug treatment and related medical services made
necessary by the distribution of illegal drugs. The treatment of drug babies is a
considerable cost to local and state governments. Insurers pay large sums for medical
treatment relating to drug addiction and use. Employers suffer losses as a result of illegal
drug use by employees due to lost productivity, employee drug-related workplace
accidents, employer contributions to medical plans, and the need to establish and
maintain employee assistance programs. Large employers, insurers, and local and state
governments have existing legal staffs that can bring civil suits against those involved in
the illegal drug market, in appropriate cases, if a clear legal mechanism for liability and
recovery is established.
(F) Drug babies, who are clearly the most innocent and vulnerable of those affected by
illegal drug use, are often the most physically and mentally damaged due to the

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

existence of an illegal drug market in a community. For many of these babies, the only
hope is extensive medical and psychological treatment, physical therapy, and special
education. All of these potential remedies are expensive. These babies, through their
legal guardians and through court-appointed guardians ad litem, should be able to
recover damages from those in the community who have entered and participated in
the marketing of the types of illegal drugs that have caused their injuries.
(G) In theory, civil actions for damages for distribution of illegal drugs can be brought
under existing law. They are not. Several barriers account for this. Under existing tort
law, only those dealers in the actual chain of distribution to a particular user can be
sued. Drug babies, parents of adolescent illegal drug users, and insurers are not likely to
be able to identify the chain of distribution to a particular user. Furthermore, drug
treatment experts largely agree that users are unlikely to identify and bring suit against
their own dealers, even after they have recovered, given the present requirements for a
civil action. Recovered users are similarly unlikely to bring suit against others in the
chain of distribution, even if they are known to the user. A user is unlikely to know other
dealers in the chain of distribution. Unlike the chain of distribution for legal products, in
which records identifying the parties to each transaction in the chain are made and
shared among the parties, the distribution of illegal drugs is clandestine. Its participants
expend considerable effort to keep the chain of distribution secret.
(H) Those involved in the illegal drug market in a community are necessarily interrelated
and interdependent, even if their identity is unknown to one another. Each new dealer
obtains the benefit of the existing illegal drug distribution system to make illegal drugs
available to him or her. In addition, the existing market aids a new entrant by the prior
development of people as users. Many experts on the illegal drug market agree that all
participants are ultimately likely to be indirectly related. That is, beginning with any one
dealer, given the theoretical ability to identify every person known by that dealer to be
involved in illegal drug trafficking, and in turn each of such others known to them, and
so on, the illegal drug market in a community would ultimately be fully revealed.
(I) Market liability has been created with respect to legitimate products by judicial
decision in some states. It provides for civil recovery by plaintiffs who are unable to
identify the particular manufacturer of the product that is claimed to have caused them
harm, allowing recovery from all manufacturers of the product who participated in that
particular market. The market liability theory has been shown to be destructive of
market initiative and product development when applied to legitimate markets. Because
of its potential for undermining markets, this Act expressly adopts a legislatively crafted
form of liability for those who intentionally join the illegal drug market. The liability
established by this Act grows out of but is distinct from existing judicially crafted market
liability.
(J) The prospect of a future suit for the costs of drug treatment may drive a wedge
between prospective dealers and their customers by encouraging users to turn on their
dealers. Therefore, liability for those costs, even to the user, is imposed under this Act as
long as the user identifies and brings suit against his or her own dealers.
(K) Allowing dealers who face a civil judgment for their illegal drug marketing to bring
suit against their own sources for contribution may also drive a wedge into the
relationships among some participants in the illegal drug distribution network.
(L) While not all persons who have suffered losses as a result of the marketing of illegal
drugs will pursue an action for damages, at least some individuals, guardians of drug
babies, government agencies that provide treatment, insurance companies, and
employers will find such an action worthwhile. These persons deserve the opportunity to
recover their losses. Some new entrants to retail illegal drug dealing are likely to be
deterred even if only a few of these suits are actually brought.

Section 4. {Definitions.} As used in this Act:
(A) "Illegal drug" means a drug whose distribution is a violation of state law.
(B) "Illegal drug market" means the support system of illegal drug related operations,
from production to retail sales, through which an illegal drug reaches the user.
(C) "Illegal drug market target community" is the area described under Section 9.
(D) "Individual drug user" means the individual whose illegal drug use is the basis of an
action brought under this Act.
(E) "Level 1 offense" means possession of 1/4 ounce or more, but less than four ounces,
or distribution of less than one ounce of a specified illegal drug, or possession of one
pound or 25 plants or more, but less than four pounds or 50 plants, or distribution of
less than one pound of marijuana.
(F) "Level 2 offense" means possession of four ounces or more, but less than eight
ounces, or distribution of one ounce or more, but less than two ounces, of a specified
illegal drug, or possession of four pounds or more or 50 plants or more, but less than
eight pounds or 75 plants, or distribution of more than one pound, but less than five
pounds, of marijuana.
(G) "Level 3 offense" means possession of eight ounces or more, but less than 16
ounces, or distribution of two ounces or more, but less than four ounces, of a specified
illegal drug or possession of eight pounds or more or 75 plants or more, but less than 16
pounds or 100 plants, or distribution of more than 5 pounds, but less than 10 pounds,
of marijuana.
(H) "Level 4 offense" means possession of 16 ounces or more or distribution of four
ounces or more of a specified illegal drug or possession of 16 pounds or more or 100
plants or more or distribution of 10 pounds or more of marijuana.
(I) "Participate in the illegal drug market" means to distribute, possess with an intent to
distribute, commit an act intended to facilitate the marketing or distribution of, or agree

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

to distribute, possess with an intent to distribute, or commit an act intended to facilitate
the marketing and distribution of an illegal drug. "Participate in the illegal drug market"
does not include the purchase or receipt of an illegal drug for personal use only.
(J) "Person" means an individual, governmental entity, corporation, firm, trust,
partnership, or incorporated or unincorporated association, existing under or authorized
by the laws of this state, another state, or a foreign country.
(K) "Period of illegal drug use" means, in relation to the individual drug user, the time of
the individual's first use of an illegal drug to the accrual of the cause of action. The
period of illegal drug use is presumed to commence two years before the cause of action
accrues unless the defendant proves otherwise clear and convincing evidence.
(L) "Place of illegal drug activity" means, in relation to the individual drug user, each
state house legislative district in which the individual possesses or uses an illegal drug or
in which the individual resides, attends school, or is employed during the period of the
individual's illegal drug use, unless the defendant proves otherwise by clear and
convincing evidence.
(M) "Place of participation" means, in relation to a defendant in an action brought under
this Act, each state house legislative district in which the person participates in the
illegal drug market or in which the person resides, attends school, or is employed during
the period of the person's participation in the illegal drug market.
(N) "Specified illegal drug" means cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine and any other
drug the distribution of which is a violation of state law.

Section 5. {Liability for participation in the illegal drug market.}
(A) A person who knowingly participates in the illegal drug market within this state is
liable for civil damages as provided in this Act. A person may recover damages under
this Act for injury resulting from an individual's use of an illegal drug.
(B) A law enforcement officer or agency, the state, or a person acting at the direction of
a law enforcement officer or agency or the state is not liable for participating in the
illegal drug market, if the participation is in furtherance of an official investigation.

Section 6. {Recovery of damages.}
(A) One or more of the following persons may bring an action for damages caused by an
individual's use of an illegal drug:
(1) a parent, legal guardian, child, spouse, or sibling of the individual drug user;
(2) an individual who was exposed to an illegal drug in utero;
(3) an employer of the individual drug user;
(4) a medical facility, insurer, governmental entity, employer, or other entity that funds
a drug treatment program or employee assistance program for the individual drug user
or that otherwise expended money on behalf of the individual drug user;
(5) a person injured as a result of the willful, reckless, or negligent actions of an
individual drug user.
(B) A person entitled to bring an action under this section may seek damages from one
or more of the following:
(1) a person who knowingly distributed, or knowingly participated in the chain of
distribution of, an illegal drug that was actually used by the individual drug user;
(2) a person who knowingly participated in the illegal drug market if:
(a) the place of illegal drug activity by the individual drug user is within the illegal drug
market target community of the defendant; and;
(b) the defendant's participation in the illegal drug market was connected with the same
type of illegal drug used by the individual drug user and;
(c) the defendant participated in the illegal drug market at any time during the
individual drug user's period of illegal drug use.
(C) A person entitled to bring an action under this section may recover all of the
following damages:
(1) economic damages, including, but not limited to, the cost of treatment and
rehabilitation, medical expenses, loss of economic or educational potential, loss of
productivity, absenteeism, support expenses, accidents or injury, and any other
pecuniary loss proximately caused by the illegal drug use;
(2) non-economic damages, including, but not limited to, physical and emotional pain,
suffering, physical impairment, emotional distress, mental anguish, disfigurement, loss
of enjoyment, loss of companionship, services and consortium, and other nonpecuniary
losses proximately caused by an individual's use of an illegal drug;
(3) exemplary damages;
(4) reasonable attorneys' fees;
(5) costs of suit, including, but not limited to, reasonable expenses for expert testimony.

Section 7. {Limited recovery of damages.}

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

(A) An individual drug user shall not bring an action for damages caused by the use of
an illegal drug, except as otherwise provided in this subsection. An individual drug user
may bring an action for damages caused by the use of an illegal drug only if all of the
following conditions are met:
(1) the individual personally discloses to narcotics enforcement authorities, more than
six months before filing the action, all of the information known to the individual
regarding all that individual's sources of illegal drugs;
(2) the individual has not used an illegal drug within the six months before filing the
action;
(3) The individual continues to remain free of the use of an illegal drug throughout the
pendency of the action.
(B) A person entitled to bring an action under this section may seek damages only from
a person who distributed, or is in the chain of distribution of, an illegal drug that was
actually used by the individual drug user.
(C) A person entitled to bring an action under this section may recover only the following
damages:
(1) economic damages, including, but not limited to, the cost of treatment,
rehabilitation, and medical expenses, loss of economic or educational potential, loss of
productivity, absenteeism, accidents or injury, and any other pecuniary loss proximately
caused by the person's illegal drug use;
(2) reasonable attorneys' fees;
(3) costs of suit, including, but not limited to, reasonable expenses for expert testimony.

Section 8. {Third party cases.} A third party shall not pay damages awarded

under this Act, or provide a defense or money for a defense, on behalf of an insured
under a contract of insurance or indemnification.

Section 9. {Illegal drug market target community.} A person whose

participation in the illegal drug market constitutes the following level offense shall be
considered to have the following illegal drug market target community:
(A) for a level 1 offense, the state house legislative district (states may designate their
counties as the area described as the drug target communities, place of participation
and place of illegal drug activity) in which the defendant's place of participation is
situated;
(B) for a level 2 offense, the target community described in
Subsection A plus all state house legislative districts with a border contiguous to that
target community;
(C) for a level 3 offense, the target community described in Subsection B plus all state
house legislative districts with a border contiguous to that target community;
(D) for a level 4 offense, the state.

Section 10. {Joinder of parties.}
(A) Two or more persons may join in one action under this Act as plaintiffs if their
respective actions have at least one place of illegal drug activity in common and if any
portion of the period of illegal drug use overlaps with the period of illegal drug use for
every other plaintiff.
(B) Two or more persons may be joined in one action under this Act as defendants if
those persons are liable to at least one plaintiff.
(C) A plaintiff need not be interested in obtaining and a defendant need not be
interested in defending against all the relief demanded. Judgment may be given for one
or more plaintiffs according to their respective rights to relief and against one or more
defendants according to their respective liabilities.

Section 11. {Comparative responsibility.}
(A) An action by an individual drug user is governed by the principles of comparative
responsibility. Comparative responsibility attributed to the plaintiff does not bar recovery
but diminishes the award of compensatory damages proportionally, according to the
measure of responsibility attributed to the plaintiff.
(B) The burden of proving the comparative responsibility of the plaintiff is on the
defendant, which shall be shown by clear and convincing evidence.
(C) Comparative responsibility shall not be attributed to a plaintiff who is not an
individual drug user.

Section 12. {Contribution among and recovery from multiple
defendants.} A person subject to liability under this Act has a right of action for

contribution against another person subject to liability under this Act. Contribution may
be enforced either in the original action or by a separate action brought for that
purpose. A plaintiff may seek recovery in accordance with this Act and existing law
against a person whom a defendant has asserted a right of contribution.

Section 13. {Standard of proof; effect of criminal drug conviction.}
(A) Proof of participation in the illegal drug market in an action brought under this Act
shall be shown by clear and convincing evidence. Except as otherwise provided in this
Act, other elements of the cause of action shall be shown by a preponderance of the

evidence.

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

(B) A person against whom recovery is sought who has a criminal conviction pursuant to
state drug laws or the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970
(Public Law 91-513, 84 Stat. 1236, codified at 21 U.S.C. Section 801 et. seq.) is
estopped from denying participation in the illegal drug market. Such a conviction is also
prima facie evidence of the person's participation in the illegal drug market during the
two years preceding the date of an act giving rise to a conviction.
(C) The absence of a criminal drug conviction of a person against whom recovery is
sought does not bar an action against that person.

Section 14. {Prejudgment attachment and execution on judgments.}
(A) A plaintiff under this Act, subject to Section 14 (C), may request an ex parte
prejudgment attachment order from the court against all assets of a defendant sufficient
to satisfy a potential award. If attachment is instituted, a defendant is entitled to an
immediate hearing. Attachment may be lifted if the defendant demonstrates that the
assets will be available for a potential award or if the defendant posts a bond sufficient to
cover a potential award.
(B) A person against whom a judgment has been rendered under this Act is not eligible
to exempt any property, of whatever kind, from process to levy or process to execute on
the judgment.
(C) Any assets sought to satisfy a judgment under this Act that are named in a forfeiture
section or have been seized for forfeiture by any state or federal agency may not be
used to satisfy a judgment unless and until the assets have been released following the
conclusion of the forfeiture action or released by the agency that seized the assets.

Section 15. {Statute of limitations.}
(A) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a claim under this
Act shall not be brought more than two years after the cause of action accrues. A cause
of action accrues under this Act when a person who may recover has reason to know of
the harm from illegal drug use that is the basis for the cause of action and has reason to
know that the illegal drug use is the cause of the harm.
(B) For a plaintiff, the statute of limitations under this section is tolled while the
individual potential plaintiff is incapacitated by the use of an illegal drug to the extent
that the individual cannot reasonably be expected to seek recovery under this Act or as
otherwise provided by law. For a defendant, the statute of limitations under this section
is tolled until six months after the individual potential defendant is convicted of a
criminal drug offense or as otherwise provided by law.
(C) The statute of limitations under this Act for a claim based on participation in the
illegal drug market that occurred prior to the effective date of this Act does not begin to
run until the effective date of this Act.

Section 16. {Representation of governmental entities; stay of action.}
(A) A prosecuting attorney may represent the state or a political subdivision of the state
in an action brought under this Act.
(B) On motion by a governmental agency involved in a drug investigation or
prosecution, an action brought under this Act shall be stayed until the completion of the
criminal investigation or prosecution that gave rise to the motion for a stay of the action.

Section 17. {Effect on existing laws.} The provisions of this Act are not intended
to alter the law regarding intrafamily tort immunity.

Section 18. {Severability clause.} If any provision of this Act or the application of
any provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Act
and the application of such provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be
affected by that invalidation.

Section 19. {Repealer clause.}
Section 20. {Effective date.}
ALEC's Sourcebook of American State Legislation 1995

About Us and ALEC EXPOSED. The About
Center for
Media and
Democracy
corporate spin and government
Members
Login
Logout reports
Events on
& Meetings
Model Legislation
Task Forces and
ALEC
Initiatives
Publications www.SourceWatch.org,
Home
propaganda.! We are located
in Madison, Wisconsin,
publish
www.PRWatch.org,
Join ALEC contact:
Contact editor@prwatch.org
News
and now www.ALECexposed.org. For more information
or 608-260-9713.