Skip navigation
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct - Header

Center for Media and Democracy Alec Model Legislation Criminal Justice Drug Testing Act

Download original document:
Brief thumbnail
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
See Center for Media and Democracy's quick summary on last page

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

D I D Y O U K N O W ? Corporations VOTED to adopt this. Through ALEC, global companies
Search

LOGIN | LOGOUT
HOMEto
| govern
JOIN ALEC
| CONTACT
work as “equals” in “unison” with politicians
to write| laws
your
life. Big
Business
has “a VOICE and
VOTE,” according
to newly exposed
documents. DO YOU?
MODEL LEGISLATION
TASKaFORCES
ALEC INITIATIVES
PUBLICATIONS

ALEC EXPOSED
ABOUT

GO

MEMBERS

EVENTS & MEETINGS

“ALEC”
NEWShas long been a
secretive collaboration
between
BigLegislation
Business and
Model
“conservative”
politicians.
Civil Justice
Behind closed doors, they
Commerce,
Insurance,
ghostwrite
“model”
bills to
and Economic
be introduced
in state
Development
capitols across the country.
This agenda--underwritten
Education
by global corporations-Energy,
includes
majorEnvironment,
tax
and Agriculture
loopholes
for big industries
and the
superRelations
rich,
Federal
proposals to offshore U.S.
Health
Human
jobs and
gutand
minimum
wage,Services
and efforts to
weaken
public health,
International
Relations
safety, and environmental
Public Safety
andmany
protections.
Although
Elections
of these
bills have become
law, until
their Policy
origin
Tax now,
and Fiscal
has been largely unknown.
Telecommunications
With ALEC
EXPOSED, the
Centerand
forInformation
Media and
Technology
Democracy hopes more
Americans will study the
Print this Page
bills to understand
the
depth andText-Only
breadth Page
of how
big corporations are
Email
this Page
changing the
legal
rules
and undermining democracy
across the nation.

ALEC’s’Corporate Board
--in recent past or present

• AT&T Services, Inc.
• centerpoint360
• UPS
• Bayer Corporation
• GlaxoSmithKline
• Energy Future Holdings
• Johnson & Johnson
• Coca-Cola Company
• PhRMA
• Kraft Foods, Inc.
• Coca-Cola Co.
• Pfizer Inc.
• Reed Elsevier, Inc.
• DIAGEO
• Peabody Energy
• Intuit, Inc.
• Koch Industries, Inc.
• ExxonMobil
• Verizon
• Reynolds American Inc.
• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
• Salt River Project
• Altria Client Services, Inc.
• American Bail Coalition
• State Farm Insurance
For more on these corporations,
search at www.SourceWatch.org.

Home

Model Legislation

Public Safety and Elections

Criminal Justice Drug Testing Act
Summary

Did you know the
NRA--the National
Rifle Association-was the corporate
co-chair in 2011?

This Act would require probation, corrections, and parole agencies to develop drug
testing plans for those under their supervision. The agencies would be authorized to
drug test all classes of crime. However, they would be required to drug test persons
convicted of intoxicated driving, persons convicted of drug related offenses, or persons
with a history of illegal drug use.
The Act would require agencies to distribute a written statement explaining their drug
testing program, and would require them to establish procedural, confirmation, chain of
custody, confidentiality, and record-keeping safeguards.
Persons who refuse to submit to a drug test or who test positive would have their
probation, intensive probation, parole, work release, electronic home detention, or any
intermediate sentence being served in lieu of incarceration, revoked.

Model Legislation
{Title, enacting clause, etc.}
Section 1. {Title.} This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Criminal Justice
Drug Testing Act.

Section 2. {Definitions.} As used in this Act:
(A) "Agency" means any governmental organization, or organization acting under the
authority of the government, which has jurisdiction and responsibility for persons
charged with, or convicted of, criminal or motor vehicle offenses or child abuse or
neglect.
(B) "Announced Drug Testing" means drug testing of a defendant when the defendant
has been provided with the time, date, and location of a drug test.
(C) "Defendant" means a person, adult or juvenile, who is charged with, or convicted of,
a criminal or motor vehicle offense or child abuse or neglect who is under the jurisdiction
of any agency.
(D) "Drug test" means a test administered for the purpose of determining the presence
of absence of a prohibited drug or the metabolites of a prohibited drug in a person's
bodily fluids or respiration.
(E) "Initial test" means the first drug test on a defendant to determine the presence or
absence of prohibited drugs or their metabolites in specimens.
(F) "Officer" means an employee or agent of an agency who has responsibility for the
sentencing, surveillance, evaluation, treatment, or custody of defendants.
(G) "On-site drug test" means a drug test where the specimen collection and drug test
is performed in the presence of the defendant either at:
(1) an agency facility, or
(2) in a location where an officer is performing his/her lawful duty.
(H) "Prescription or nonprescription medicine" means a drug prescribed for use by a
duly licensed physician, dentist, or other medical practitioner licensed to issue
prescriptions, or a drug that is authorized for general distribution and use in the
treatment of human diseases, ailments, or injuries pursuant to the Federal Food Drug
and Cosmetic Act, 52 Stat.1040 (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq).
(I) "Prohibited drug" means any substance, other than alcohol, having psychological
and/or physiological effects on a human being and that is not a prescription or nonprescription medication, including controlled dangerous substances and controlled
substance analogs or volatile substances which produce the psychological and/or
physiological effects of a controlled dangerous substance through deliberate inhalation.
(J) "Reasonable suspicion" means a belief that a defendant is using or has used
prohibited drugs drawn from specific objective and articulated facts and reasonable
inferences drawn from those facts in light of experience, which may be based upon,
among other things:

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

(1) observable phenomena, such as direct observation of prohibited drug use and/or the
physical symptoms or manifestations of being under the influence of a prohibited drug;
(2) abnormal conduct or erratic behavior;
(3) a report of prohibited drug use provided by a reliable and credible source;
(4) evidence that a defendant has tampered with a drug test;
(5) evidence that a defendant is involved in the use, possession, sale, solicitation, or
transfer of prohibited drugs.
(K) "Specimen" means a tissue or product of the human body chemically capable of
revealing the presence of prohibited drugs in the human body.
(L) "Unannounced drug test" means selecting defendants for drug testing using a
mechanism that:
(1) results in an equal probability that any defendant from a group of defendants
subject to the selection mechanism will be selected; and
(2) does not give an officer discretion to waive the selection of any defendant selected
under the mechanism.

Section 3. {Agency plans and coordination.}
(A) Agencies shall prepare a drug testing plan that shall include:
(1) drug testing goals including:
(a) surveillance of defendants for the protection of society;
(b) deterrence of criminal behavior;
(c) rehabilitation of defendants;
(2) procedures for staff training;
(3) plans for logistical support;
(4) specimen collection procedures;
(5) laboratory selection and/or on-site testing procedures;
(6) chain of custody procedures;
(7) reporting of drug test results;
(8) guidelines on providing notice to defendants;
(9) the circumstances under which drug testing is authorized.
(B) All drug testing plans and procedures shall be reviewed and dated annually.
(C) Each agency shall appoint a drug testing program coordinator who shall coordinate
the agency's drug testing plan.

Section 4. {Drugs to be tested.} All agency plans may require drug tests for any
prohibited drug and shall conduct drug tests for marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines,
barbiturates, opiates, and phencyclidine (PCP).

Section 5. {Drug testing authorization.} Whenever a defendant has a history of
prohibited drug use or a conviction of a prohibited drug-related offense, drug testing
shall be required. A defendant has a history of prohibited drug use and/or a prohibited
drug offense under the following circumstances:
(A) the defendant admits to prohibited drug use or having been convicted of a
prohibited drug-related offense;
(B) the defendant has a record of a conviction of prohibited drug-related offense;
(C) the defendant has a history of drug or alcoholism treatment;
(D) an officer has a report from a reliable and credible source that the defendant is using
or has used prohibited drugs or has a history of prohibited drug use or a conviction for a
prohibited drug-related offense;
(E) there is reasonable suspicion that the defendant is using or has used prohibited
drugs.

Section 6. {Types of testing authorized.} All drug testing conducted by

agencies shall be in conformity with the standards established in this Act and all
applicable regulations promulgated pursuant to this Act. Each agency plan shall
authorize unannounced, announced, and reasonable suspicion drug testing and the
circumstances under which each type of testing will occur.

Section 7. {Testing Methodologies authorized.} A drug test shall be an
immunoassay of one of four types:
(A) radio immunoassay (RIA);
(B) latex agglutination inhibition immunoassay (LAI);

(C) enzyme immunoassay (EIA);

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

(D) fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA).

Section 8. {Classes of offenses for which drug testing is authorized.}

Drug testing is authorized for all classes of offenses including criminal, motor vehicle,
and child abuse and neglect. The offense may or may not be related directly to
prohibited drugs.

Section 9. {Discretion of officers to require drug tests and to apply
sanctions.}
(A) Officers shall be authorized to require that defendants submit to drug testing when
the officer in his or her professional opinion believes that testing is authorized by the
agency plan or when the officer determines that the defendant has a history of drug use
or there is a drug-related offense.
(B) If the defendant refuses to submit to a drug test or if the defendant has a positive
drug test result that has not been successfully contested or explained by the defendant,
an officer may apply any lawful sanction for discipline, revocation, or contempt normally
available to the officer when a defendant violates any lawful order or request of an
officer.

Section 10. {Presumption of proof and admissibility of drug test
results.}
(A) A positive drug test result obtained in accordance with this Act on a specimen
provided by a defendant shall be presumptive proof of the use of a prohibited drug by
the defendant.
(B) A report of a drug test result that has been obtained in accordance with this Act
shall be admissible in any hearing conducted by an agency as a business record
exception to the hearsay rule.

Section 11. {Drug testing following a sentence.} All initial drug tests

authorized by the Act, or by any agency, shall occur within 30 days of a sentence or a
release from custody.

Section 12. {Drug testing as punishment or discipline.} No defendant shall
be required to submit to a drug test solely as a means of punishment or discipline.

Section 13. {Procedures and defendant protection.}
(A) All specimen collection and testing for prohibited drugs under this Act shall be
performed in accordance with the following procedures:
(1) Specimens shall be collected in a manner that is reasonably calculated to prevent
substitution of specimens and that will reasonably preclude specimen contamination or
adulteration of specimens. Specimen donation may be observed. Donation of the
specimen shall be observed by a person of the same sex as the defendant when an
officer of the same sex is available. Observation must be direct and continuous.
(2) Specimen collection shall be documented, and the documentation procedures may
include:
(a) chain of custody procedures to reasonably preclude the likelihood of erroneous
identification of test results;
(b) an opportunity for the defendant to provide any information that he/she considers
relevant to the test, including identification of currently or recently used prescription or
nonprescription drugs, or other relevant medical information. The provision of this
information shall not preclude the administration of the drug test, and may be taken in
to account in interpreting any positive results.
(3) Specimen storage and transportation to the testing site shall be performed in a
manner that will reasonably preclude specimen contamination or adulteration.
(4) All drug testing shall conform to scientifically accepted analytical methods and
procedures, and all initial drug tests shall be performed within 48 hours of specimen
collection.
(5) A specimen for a drug test may be taken or collected by a qualified person employed
by a licensed laboratory or a person deemed qualified by an agency.
(B) A defendant shall have the right to obtain a copy of the drug test report prior to any
agency hearing regarding the imposition of sanctions on the defendant for having a
positive drug test result or for refusing to submit to a lawful drug test requirement.

Section 14. {On-site drug testing.} On-site drug testing is authorized by this Act.
Section 15. {Preventing adulteration.}
(A) To ensure that a defendant does not adulterate a specimen when donating a
specimen, an officer, or other person authorized by an agency, is authorized to:
(1) conduct a frisk search of the defendant to determine if adulterants are stored on the
defendant's body or clothes;
(2) require that the defendant wash his/her hands prior to specimen donation.
(B) It shall be unlawful for a person to intentionally or willfully alter, replace, or dispose of
a specimen, or to alter, remove, or replace the identification labels of a specimen, or to

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

commit any other act for the purpose of producing an incorrect result. Any person who
violates the provisions of this paragraph shall be guilty of a [cite class of offensemisdemeanor or felony].

Section 16. {Chain of custody.}
(A) Except for on-site drug tests, all drug tests conducted under this Act shall provide
for the following chain of custody protection:
(1) The defendant shall be properly identified using a driver's license or similar official
identification.
(2) The defendant shall register at the collection site using his/her name or an
identification number.
(3) The specimen container shall be labeled with the defendant's identification (name or
number), and the defendant shall initial the container label or test kit label indicating it
is his/her specimen. The defendant shall affix the label to the specimen container.
(4) A chain of custody form shall be completed, and it shall accompany the specimen to
the laboratory.
(B) In the case of an on-site test, the officer conducting the test shall complete an onsite drug test result form that shall serve as the drug test result report and chain of
custody form. The form shall indicate the drug test result and shall be signed by the
officer in the presence of the defendant. The defendant shall be provided the
opportunity to sign the form indicating it is a report on his/her specimen. The defendant
shall have been properly identified to the officer who shall note it on the drug test form.

Section 17. {Drug test result reports.} All drug test results must have indicia of
reliability to include the following:

(A) The report must be on agency or laboratory letterhead with the name and address of
the laboratory or agency that performed the test and the positive identification of the
person tested.
(B) The officer administering the on-site test, or the appropriate person in a laboratory,
must sign and date the report.
(C) The report shall list the prohibited drugs tested for, the results, and the drug test
methodology utilized.
(D) The report shall not disclose the presence or absence of any physical or mental
condition or of any drug other than the specific prohibited drug and/or its metabolites
that an agency requests to be identified.

Section 18. {Release of drug test results.} Results of drug tests shall be
released only as follows:
(A) to the defendant;
(B) to other persons with the written consent of the defendant;
(C) to medical personnel to meet the medical needs of the defendant;
(D) pursuant to a court order;
(E) to qualified personnel who have a legitimate audit or program
coordination function; or
(F) to agency officers on a need-to-know basis.

Section 19. {Record-keeping.} Each agency shall keep proper records to include:
(A) chain of custody forms and drug test result reports;
(B) records of drug test results including the number of unannounced
tests, announced tests, and reasonable suspicion tests;
(C) records of supplies and reagent dating;
(D) documentation of training for test operators of on-site tests;
(E) equipment maintenance records.

Section 20. {Civil immunity.}
(A) Agency officers, drug testing coordinators, other responsible officials, and drug test
manufacturers shall have immunity from civil liability under state law for any good faith
implementation of a drug test plan or procedure, training, manufacture of drug test, or
any conduct arising out of this Act.
(B) Civil liability shall only be established by clear and convincing evidence that a drug
test was knowingly and purposefully administered, or, with respect to the manufacturer,
manufactured in bad faith and in violation of this Act.

Section 21. {Confirmation of drug test results.}

(A) If, in the discretion of an officer, a confirmation of a drug test result is desirable, drug
tests may be confirmed by one of three methods:
(1) an admission of drug use by the defendant;
(2) a re-test on the same device used in the initial test;

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

(3) a more specific alternative method.
(B) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require confirmation of a drug test arising
out of this Act.

Section 22. {Reporting for drug testing.} If a defendant is required to submit to
a drug test, he/she shall report for the drug test within
24 hours of being notified or as otherwise required by the agency.

Section 23. {Notice of drug testing.}
(A) All defendants shall be provided in writing with the following notice of drug testing:
(1) types of testing authorized;
(2) a list of all drugs for which the defendant might be tested. Each drug shall be
described by its brand name or common name, as applicable, as well as its chemical
name;
(3) the specimen(s) required to be submitted;
(4) a statement describing the testing procedures;
(5) consequences of a refusal to take a drug test including that a refusal to take a drug
test may be used against the defendant in an agency hearing;
(6) consequences of a positive or negative drug test result including that a positive drug
test result may be used against the defendant in an agency hearing;
(7) the responsibility of the defendant submitting to the drug test to report his/her use
of a prescription or nonprescription medicine.
(B) The defendant submitting to the test shall sign a statement to indicate his/her
knowledge and understanding of the information set forth in the notice. A failure to sign
the statement shall not invalidate the results of any drug test.

Section 24. {Officer training.}
(A) Each agency shall establish a program to train and certify persons to collect
specimens and conduct on-site drug tests.
(B) Agencies may designate employees for this training and certification, and may utilize
any person so trained and certified to conduct the on-site drug tests.

Section 25. {Pretrial drug testing.} This Act authorizes orders prohibiting

defendants who are released on bail from using prohibited drugs and requiring drug
testing for those defendants who have a history of prohibited drug use or prohibited
drug-related offenses and providing for sanctions for violations of the orders including
the revocation of release, punishment for contempt, or other sanctions deemed
appropriate by the court.

Section 26 . {Drug testing as a condition of probation.}
(A) When imposing a sentence to probation, the court may require such conditions as it
deems appropriate, and may include any one or more of the following:
(1) an order instructing the defendant to refrain from the use of alcohol or of prohibited
drugs;
(2) an order to submit to announced or unannounced drug testing for prohibited drugs.
(B) Upon any evidence of a history of prohibited drug use or a conviction for a prohibited
drug offense on the part of the defendant, the court shall require as a condition of
probation that the defendant submit to announced or unannounced drug testing for
prohibited drugs.

Section 27. {Intensive probation supervision.}
(A) Defendants enrolled in an intensive probation program who have a history of
prohibited drug use or a conviction of a prohibited drug offense, shall be required to
remain drug free and allow administration of drug and alcohol tests as required by
Subsection (B) of this Section or as required by an officer, and they may be required to
participate in an approved drug rehabilitation program.
(B) Unannounced tests shall be administered not less than once per week for persons
enrolled in intensive probation supervision.
(C) The following shall be considered permissible reasons for revocation of intensive
probation:
(1) if a defendant at any time refuses to undergo drug testing as authorized by this Act
or has a positive drug test result from a drug test administered in accordance with this
Act;
(2) failure to successfully complete the required drug rehabilitation program;
(3) violation of any term or condition of the probation authorized by this Act or of any
term or condition of the applicable drug rehabilitation program.
(D) A defendant whose intensive probation is revoked will be required to serve out
his/her term of incarceration.

(E) An action for violation under this section may be brought by an officer or prosecutor.

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

Section 28. {Ordering incarcerated defendants to submit to drug tests.}
Incarcerated defendants may be required to submit urine for analysis under any of the
following circumstances:
(A) an officer believes that there is reasonable suspicion to suspect the defendant of
using or possessing drugs;
(B) a supervising officer, in accordance with an agency plan, orders all defendants in a
particular housing unit to submit drug tests. Such orders shall be in writing and this
authority may not be delegated;
(C) an officer orders drugs tests for any defendants returning from furlough or other
unsupervised temporary release from custody;
(D) upon recommendation of an officer as part of a sanction for a prohibited drug or
alcohol related infraction;
(E) an officer requires a defendant to submit to drug testing in accordance with an
agency plan;
(F) there is a need to drug test for the purpose of deterring and controlling the
introduction of contraband into a custodial setting;
(G) a defendant has a history of prohibited drug use or a conviction of a prohibited drugrelated offense.

Section 29. {Drug testing for defendants on parole.} In addition to other

requirements imposed on defendants as a condition of parole or release to mandatory
supervision, on evidence of a history of prohibited drug use or a conviction of a
prohibited drug-related offense, a defendant shall be required to submit to drug testing.

Section 30. {Work release.} Defendants may be required to submit to a drug test

as a condition of a work release application or sentence. A refusal to submit to drug
testing, or a positive drug test result, may be a basis for refusing to admit the defendant
into the program or to revoke the work release and return the defendant to
incarceration.

Section 31. {Treatment drug testing.} Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
prevent alcoholism or drug abuse treatment programs who provide treatment to
defendants from requiring drug testing as part of their treatment plans for defendants.

Section 32. {Funding.}
(A) The agencies shall pay for the costs of developing and implementing their drug
testing plans from funds made available through the Drug Testing Program Fund. All
monies collected or appropriated pursuant to this section shall be forwarded to the [cite
appropriate agency] to be deposited in a revolving fund to be known as the "Drug
Testing Program Fund" which shall be distributed by the [cite appropriate agency] for
agency drug testing programs.
(B) In addition to any disposition authorized by any other statute indicating the
dispositions that can be ordered for conviction of a violation of [cite state controlled
substance act], every person convicted of [cite state controlled substances act] shall
pay a surcharge of $200 for a first offense and $300 for a second offense and $500 for
every offense thereafter, which shall be deposited in the Drug Testing Program Fund.
(C) In addition to any disposition authorized by any other statute indicating the
dispositions that can be ordered for a conviction of a violation of [cite state controlled
substance act], every person convicted of [cite state controlled substance act] shall pay
a fee of $100 for each drug test that shall be assessed to each defendant who is
required to submit to drug testing, which shall be deposited in the Drug Testing
Program Fund.
(D) Nothing in this Act shall be deemed to affect or suspend any other criminal sanctions
imposed pursuant to [cite controlled substance act].
(E) All surcharges and fees provided for in this Act shall be collected as provided for
collection of fines and restitution in [cite appropriate state law].

Section 33. {Intoxicated driving.}
(A) In addition to the requirements otherwise set forth in law concerning the restoration
of a suspended or revoked driver's license, any defendant whose driver's license has
been suspended for a violation of [cite intoxicated driving statute] shall, as a condition
for the restoration of that license, submit to a drug test for the purpose of determining
the presence or absence of any prohibited drug.
(B) A defendant subject to the provisions of this Act shall be given 10 days notice prior
to the date on which he/she shall be required to submit to a drug test. Prior to, or at the
time of, the drug test, the defendant shall have the opportunity to submit medical
documentation to verify his or her use of a prescription or nonprescription medicine.
(C) If the drug test required under the provisions of this section indicate the presence of
a prohibited drug, the [state motor vehicle agency] shall so notify the defendant tested
and inform the defendant that his/her license shall not be restored and that the
forfeiture of the defendant's right to operate a motor vehicle over the highways of this
state remains in effect.
(D) A defendant who, pursuant to the provisions of this Act, is denied the restoration of
his/her driver's license and right to operate a motor vehicle over the highways of the
state, shall not be permitted to submit another motor vehicle agency] shall so notify the

Exposed

By the Center for
Media and Democracy
www.prwatch.org

defendant tested and inform the defendant that his/her license shall not be restored and
that the forfeiture of the defendant's right to operate a motor vehicle over the highways
of this state remains in effect.
(D) A defendant who, pursuant to the provisions of this Act, is denied
the restoration of his/her driver's license and right to operate a motor vehicle over the
highways of the state, shall not be permitted to submit another specimen for testing for
120 days from the date the agency notified the defendant that his/her driver's license
had not been restored.
(E) The results of the drug tests conducted pursuant to the provisions of this Act shall
be made available only to the agency and to the defendant.
(F) The result of any drug test conducted for the purposes of driver license restoration
shall not be used in any civil or criminal proceeding against the defendant tested.
(G) The agency may charge a fee of $50 for the restoration of any license that has been
suspended or revoked by reason of the licensee's violation of any of the provisions of this
Act or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto and, in the case of a license suspended
for a violation of [the state intoxicated driving law], any additional charge the agency
shall determine is necessary to cover the actual cost of providing the drug testing
required under the provisions of this chapter.

Section 34. {Physician-patient relationship.} A physician-patient relationship is

not created between a defendant and an agency or any person performing or evaluating
the drug test, solely by the establishment or implementation of a drug testing plan.

Section 35. {Retroactivity.} This Act shall not be retroactive and shall not abrogate
the right of an agency under State law to conduct drug tests prior to the effective
implementation date of this Act. A drug test conducted by an agency before the
effective date of this Act is not subject to this Act.

Section 36. {Rules.} The commissioners of the agencies shall promulgate rules and
regulations necessary to effect the purposes of this Act in accordance with the [state
administrative procedures act]. They shall include rules and regulations concerning the
establishment of plans, procedures, and standards for all the technical aspects of drug
testing including, but not limited to:
(A) the collection of specimens;
(B) procedures to ensure the integrity of the chain of custody;
(C) technical standards and authority of the agency personnel; and
(D) the training and authority of the agency personnel conducting those tests.

Section 37. {Annual report.} Each agency shall submit an annual report on the
implementation of its drug testing plan to the Governor and the legislature.

Section 38. {Federal compliance.} The drug testing procedures provided here do
not apply to defendants subject to drug testing pursuant to:

(A) federal regulations that specifically preempt state and local regulation of drug testing
with respect to such defendants;
(B) federal regulations or requirements enacted or implemented in connection with the
operation of federally regulated facilities;
(C) federal contracts; or
(D) state agency rules that adopt federal regulations applicable to the interstate
component of a federally regulated activity.

Section 39. {Severability clause.}
Section 40. {Repealer clause.}
Section 41. {Effective date.}
ALEC's Sourcebook of American State Legislation 1995

About Us and ALEC EXPOSED. The Center
Media andLogin
Democracy
About for
Members
Logoutreports
Eventson
& corporate
Meetings spin and government
ModelinLegislation
Task ForcesandALEC
Initiatives
Publications www.SourceWatch.org,
Home
propaganda.! We are located
Madison, Wisconsin,
publish
www.PRWatch.org,
Join
ALEC
Contact
News
and now www.ALECexposed.org. For more information contact: editor@prwatch.org or 608-260-9713.

Center for Media
and Democracy's
quick summary:

This bill is part of a set of 1995 bills that perpetuates the failed "War on Drugs," raises privacy concerns, and wastes
taxpayer resources with no benefit. It authorizes agencies to require that all persons charged with a crime be drug
tested, even if no probable cause exists to suspect a person of being a drug user. While the results of the drug test
would be admissible in court, only the possession (or manufacture or sale) of drugs is a crime, not the failure of a drug
test: without something more, a person cannot be penalized for failing a drug test. However, the results of the drug test
could be used to attack the character of a defendant, making the judge or jury biased against the defendant. This would
open the door to a conviction for a non-drug related crime not based on evidence, but bias (which runs against
America's Constitutional Due Process guarantees).

 

 

Disciplinary Self-Help Litigation Manual - Side
Advertise Here 4th Ad
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct Side