Bjs Report on Sexual Violence in Prisons 2005
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report July 2006, NCJ 214646 Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 By Allen J. Beck, Ph.D. and Paige M. Harrison BJS Statisticians On September 4, 2003, President George W. Bush signed into law the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-79). The legislation requires the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) to develop new national data collections on the incidence and prevalence of sexual violence within correctional facilities. This report fulfills the requirement under Sec. 4 (c)(1) of the act for submission of an annual report on the activities of BJS with respect to prison rape. In 2004, as one step in a multiphase implementation strategy, BJS completed the first-ever national survey of administrative records on sexual violence in adult and juvenile correctional facilities. In 2005 the survey was expanded to collect detailed information on substantiated incidents. New survey items included the circumstances surrounding each incident, characteristics of victims and perpetrators, the type of pressure or physical force, victim injuries, sanctions imposed, and victim assistance. The 2005 survey results should not be used to rank systems or facilities. Future data collections, based on surveys of current and former inmates, are being developed to permit reliable comparisons of facilities. Highlights 6,241 allegations of sexual violence in prison and jail reported in 2005, up from 5,386 in 2004 Total* 2005 6,241 2004 5,386 Federal prisons 268 284 State prisons 4,341 3,172 Local jails 1,384 1,700 Private prisons/jails 204 210 Other facilities 44 20 *Based on adult correctional facilities only. • 38% of allegations involved staff sexual misconduct; 35%, inmate-oninmate nonconsensual sexual acts; 17%, staff sexual harassment; and 10%, inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contact. • There were 2.83 allegations of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates in 2005, up from 2.46 in 2004. Correctional authorities substantiated 885 incidents of sexual violence in 2005, 15% of completed investigations Total* Number of substantiated incidents 885 Rate per 1,000 inmates 0.40 Federal prisons 41 0.26 State prisons 458 0.39 Local jails 336 0.45 Private prisons/jails 37 0.31 Other facilities 13 1.21 *Estimates based on the reported number of substantiated incidents times the inverse probability of selection, and then summed. • There were an estimated 0.40 substantiated incidents of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates in 2005, down from the 0.55 recorded in 2004. • Based on completed investigations only, 37% of allegations of staff sexual misconduct in local jails and 15% in State prisons were substantiated. Half of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence involved physical force or threat of force; two-thirds of staff misconduct was romantic Percent of substantiated inmate-on-inmate incidents Force/threat used Victim injured Victim given medical exam Victim placed in protective custody Perpetrator arrested/ prosecuted Perpetrator placed in solitary Nonconsensual 59% 22 Abusive sexual contacts 33% 3 63 33 49 30 58 39 72 70 • In prisons 67% of victims involved in staff sexual misconduct were male, while 62% of perpetrators were female. In jails 78% of victims of staff sexual misconduct were female; 87% of the perpetrators, male. • Staff were arrested or prosecuted in 45% of substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct; discharged, fired or resigned in 82%. Second administrative records collection conducted for 2005 Between January 1 and June 22, 2006, BJS completed the second national survey of the incidence and prevalence of sexual violence in correctional facilities. The Governments Division of the U.S. Census Bureau was the data collection agent for the survey. Initiated in 2004, the survey was conducted to provide information on occurrences of sexual violence based on allegations brought to the attention of correctional authorities. Although the results are limited to incidents reported to officials, the survey provides an understanding of what officials know, how many allegations were reported, and the outcomes of followup investigations. In 2005 the survey was expanded to obtain data on each substantiated incident in which the event was investigated and determined to have occurred. Using a separate incident form, the survey obtained incidentbased data on all substantiated allegations, providing a basis for an in-depth analysis of sexual violence. New information included details on the circumstances surrounding each incident, characteristics of victims and perpetrators, type of pressure or physical force used, victim injuries, sanctions imposed, and victim assistance. Administrative records alone cannot provide reliable estimates of sexual violence. Due to fear of reprisal from perpetrators, a code of silence among inmates, personal embarrassment, and lack of trust in staff, victims are often reluctant to report incidents to correctional authorities. BJS is developing and testing methods for more fully measuring the incidence of sexual violence in correctional facilities. These methods will rely on selfadministered surveys to provide anonymity to victims when reporting their experiences. At the same time, computer-assisted technologies will ensure uniform conditions under which inmates complete the survey, and sampling techniques and supplemental data collections will reduce potential biases. (See box below for an update of these activities.) Collection of victim self reports to begin in 2006 BJS is working toward full implementation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act. BJS has entered into cooperative agreements with — As of June 30, 2006, the following work had been completed or was underway: 1. Research Triangle International (RTI) (Raleigh, NC) to develop and test the adult prison and jail collection methodologies; • The ACASI questionnaire and survey protocols for adult inmates have been developed and tested. Between January and May 2006, BJS and RTI completed a pretest with more than 1,400 inmates in 4 State prisons, 4 local jail facilities, and 1 Federal prison. Results of the pretest will be published in October 2006 and assessed at a national meeting of stakeholders in November. 2. Westat, Inc. (Rockville, MD) to develop and test methodologies for measuring sexual violence in State and local juvenile facilities; 3. National Opinion Research Center (NORC) (Chicago, IL) to develop and test methods of collecting data from former inmates. Though underlying survey methodology and logistical procedures differ with each of the data collection efforts, the measurement strategies will be consistent. The surveys will consist of an Audio Computer-Assisted SelfInterview (ACASI) in which respondents interact with a computer-administered questionnaire using a touchscreen and follow audio instructions delivered via headphones. The use of ACASI is expected to overcome many limitations of previous research. (See Data Collections for the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003, December 30, 2005.) Prison and jail inmates • In July 2006 BJS will submit an overview of all survey procedures, sampling methods, and questionnaires to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval to begin national implementation in late 2006. • Procedures for selecting prison and jail facilities and for sampling inmates within selected facilities have been developed. In the first year of implementation, BJS expects to select 450 public and private prisons and jails and to interview more than 60,000 inmates. • Upon OMB approval, RTI field staff will begin obtaining approval from State-level Institutional Review Boards (IRB) and begin interviews in January 2007. 2 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Youth in residential placement facilities • Survey procedures and questionnaires have been developed and reviewed by State and local administrators and other stakeholders. Cognitive testing of questionnaires with eligible youth began in June 2006. • A formal pretest of collection methods in 10 juvenile facilities with up to 600 youth is planned for September 2006. • National implementation is expected in 2007. Initial survey efforts will focus on more than 14,000 adjudicated youth in a sample of 150 State-operated facilities and 30 large, local or private facilities. Former State prisoners • An ACASI questionnaire, an administrative records form, and survey protocols have been developed to survey former inmates under active parole or post-custody supervision. • A formal pretest of collection methods in 10-20 parole offices with up to 1,000 former inmates is planned for September 2006. • National implementation is scheduled in 2007 with more than 11,500 completed interviews expected in 285 parole field offices. The 2005 administrative survey provides the basis for the annual statistical review, as required under the act. These data will be used by the Review Panel on Prison Rape within the Department of Justice for purposes of conducting hearings concerning the operation of correctional facilities. The number of allegations and substantiated incidents for each system and sampled facility in the survey is provided. (See Appendix tables.) 2005 survey covered 1,866 adult correctional facilities The 2005 survey included all Federal and State prison systems and facilities operated by the U.S. military and the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (table 1). In addition, a representative sample was drawn of local jail jurisdictions, privately operated adult prisons and jails, and jails in Indian country. Altogether, the administrative survey covered 1,867 of the 5,220 adult facilities. These facilities How sexual violence was measured The definition of “rape” as required under the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 was operationalized by disaggregating sexual violence into two categories of inmate-on-inmate sexual acts and two categories of staff sexual misconduct. The categories were — Nonconsensual sexual acts Contact of any person without his or her consent, or of a person who is unable to consent or refuse; and • Contact between the penis and the vagina or the penis and the anus including penetration, however slight; or • Contact between the mouth and the penis, vagina, or anus; or • Penetration of the anal or genital opening of another person by a hand, finger, or other object. Abusive sexual contacts Contact of any person without his or her consent, or of a person who is unable to consent or refuse; and • Intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person. • Excluding incidents in which the intent of the sexual contact is to harm or debilitate rather than sexually exploit. Staff sexual misconduct Any behavior or act of a sexual nature directed toward an inmate by an employee, volunteer, official visitor, or agency representative. Romantic relationships between staff and inmates are included. Consensual or nonconsensual sexual acts include: • Intentional touching of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks with the intent to abuse, arouse, or gratify sexual desire; or • Completed, attempted, threatened, or requested sexual acts; or • Occurrences of indecent exposure, invasion of privacy, or staff voyeurism for sexual gratification. Staff sexual harassment Repeated verbal statements or comments of a sexual nature to an inmate by an employee, volunteer, official visitor, or agency representative, including: • Demeaning references to gender or derogatory comments about body or clothing; or • Profane or obscene language or gestures. housed more than 1.7 million inmates, or 78% of all inmates held in adult facilities in 2005.* The survey was based on seven separate samples corresponding to the different types of facilities covered under the act. (See Methodology, page 11.) Each sample was designed in accordance with the requirement that BJS draw a random sample, or other scientifically appropriate sample, of not less than 10% of facilities. Entire systems were selected, when possible, to maximize reporting coverage. Local and private facilities were sampled to ensure at least one in each State and with selection probabilities proportionate to the number of inmates held. In 2004 BJS developed uniform definitions of sexual violence. (See box to the left.) Incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence were classified as nonconsensual sexual acts and abusive sexual contacts. Incidents of staff-oninmate sexual violence were separated into staff sexual misconduct and staff sexual harassment. For purposes of this report, all such incidents are considered sexual violence. *A survey of State-operated juvenile systems and privately or locally operated juvenile facilities was also conducted. Survey results for juvenile systems and facilities will be published in a separate report. Table 1. Facilities selected for the Survey of Sexual Violence, 2005 Facility type Selected in Number of the 2005 facilities survey Total 5,220 1,867 Prisons Public - Federal 84 All* Public - State 1,320 All* Private 319 31 Local jails Public 3,318 347 Private 38 5 Other adult facilities Indian country jails 68 7 Military-operated 59 All* ICE-operated 14 All* *The 2005 survey included all State prison systems, all Federal facilities, and all facilities operated by the U.S. military or the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 3 State prison reporting capabilities improve during 2005 The most serious forms of sexual violence (inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts and staff sexual misconduct) were the most widely reported using survey definitions and reporting rules (table 2). During 2005 State and Federal prison authorities enhanced their abilities to report data on sexual violence. Correctional authorities in more than 36 State and Federal prison systems were able to report incidents of inmateon-inmate nonconsensual acts as defined in the 2005 survey (up from 34 in 2004). Authorities in 38 States were able to report incidents of abusive sexual contacts separately, while 10 combined these incidents with the more serious nonconsensual acts. Only 2 systems did not record abusive sexual contacts, down from 9 in 2004. The greatest improvements in reporting were for staff sexual misconduct and harassment. In 2005 most prison administrators (44) were able to report data on staff sexual misconduct using survey definitions, up from 35 in 2004. Six systems were unable to separate sexual harassment from misconduct in 2005, down from nine in 2004. Only 1 system was unable to report any data on sexual harassment in 2005, down from 13 in 2004. The ability to report incidents of sexual violence by authorities in sampled jail jurisdictions dropped during 2005. Also, jail authorities were less likely than prison authorities to meet survey definitions. A third of jail jurisdictions were unable to separate abusive sexual contacts from the more serious nonconsensual sexual acts; a fifth were unable to report staff sexual harassment separately from staff sexual misconduct. Sexual violence allegations increased The lower percents meeting survey requirements may be the result of the sampling procedures. More than twothirds of the jail jurisdictions (242) received the definitions and reporting criteria for the first time in 2005, while all of the prison systems received the survey in 2004. BJS expects to work with administrators to improve reporting, especially in large jail jurisdictions with systems too large for manual searches of paper files. Reports of sexual violence varied across systems and sampled facilities, with every State prison system except New Mexico reporting at least one allegation of sexual violence. Among the 347 sampled local jails, 131 (38%) reported an allegation. About 42% of the 36 sampled privately operated prisons and jails reported at least one allegation. As first noted in the 2004 report, the absence of uniform reporting necessitates caution when interpreting the survey results. The data should not be used to rank systems or facilities. Higher or lower counts, especially among jail jurisdictions, may reflect variations in definitions, reporting capacities, and procedures for recording allegations and not differences in the underlying incidence of sexual violence. All selected correctional systems and facilities responded to the survey. Combined, the 2005 survey recorded 5,247 allegations of sexual violence. Taking into account weights for sampled facilities, the estimated total number of allegations for the Nation was 6,241. Expressed in terms of rates, there were 2.83 allegations of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates held in 2005, up from 2.43 per 1,000 inmates held in prisons, jails, and other adult correctional facilities in 2004. Prison systems reported 74% of all allegations; local jails, 22%; private prisons and jails, 3%; and other adult facilities, 1%. Table 2. Reporting capabilities of correctional authorities to provide data on sexual violence, 2004 and 2005 Federal and State prison systems Type of sexual violence Local jails 2005 2004 2005 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Nonconsensual sexual acts Full reporting Partial* Includes abusive sexual contacts Unable to report 70.6% 9.8 19.6 0 66.7% 7.8 25.5 0 62.8% 2.3 34.9 0 78.0% 7.4 13.6 1.0 Abusive sexual contacts Full reporting Partial* Combined with other sexual acts Unable to report 74.5% 0 19.6 3.9 51.0% 5.9 25.5 17.6 61.9% 0 34.6 3.5 84.9% 0 13.6 1.5 Staff sexual misconduct Full reporting Partial* Includes sexual harassment Unable to report 86.3% 2.0 13.7 0 68.6% 5.9 17.6 7.8 76.1% 1.4 21.3 1.2 88.4% 2.5 7.9 1.2 Total 2004 Staff sexual harassment Full reporting 86.3% 52.9% 76.1% 90.3% Partial* 0 3.9 0.3 0 Combined with sexual misconduct 11.7 17.6 21.9 7.9 Unable to report 2.0 25.5 1.7 1.7 *See Appendix tables for systems and facilities that reported only incidents that were completed or substantiated. 4 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Nationwide, the number of allegations rose by nearly 16%. Consistent with improvements in reporting capabilities, State and Federal prison systems reported a 33% increase in the number of allegations; local jails reported a 19% decrease. Allegations of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates, by type of facility, 2005 Rate per National 1,000 Facility type estimate inmates Total 6,241 2.83 Prisons Public - Federal 268 1.71 Public - State 4,341 3.68 Private 182 1.80 Local jails Public 1,384 1.86 Private 22 1.33 Other adult facilities Indian country jails* 32 ^ Military-operated 8 3.08 ICE-operated 4 0.60 *Excludes facilities housing juveniles only. ^Too few cases to provide a reliable rate. About 38% of the reported allegations of sexual violence involved staff sexual misconduct, 35% involved inmate-oninmate nonconsensual sexual acts; 17% staff sexual harassment; and 10% inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts. Allegations of sexual violence, by type of incident, 2005 National Incident type estimate Percent Total 6,241 100.0 % Inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts 2,160 34.6 Inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts 611 9.8 Staff sexual misconduct 2,386 38.2 Staff sexual harassment 1,084 17.4 Federal prisons for which investigations had been completed, 14% of nonconsensual sexual acts were substantiated, compared to 15% of allegations of staff sexual misconduct (table 3). In jails 16% of completed investigations of nonconsensual sexual acts were substantiated, compared to 37% of the allegations of staff sexual misconduct. Approximately 15% of allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts in 2005 were substantiated The most common outcome of investigations of sexual violence was a determination of lack of evidence. More than 66% of allegations of staff sexual misconduct in prison and 49% of allegations of inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts were unsubstantiated. More than a third of completed investigations of nonconsensual sexual acts in State and Federal prisons (37%) and local jails (38%) were determined to be unfounded. Allegations reported in 2005 were classified as: • substantiated, if they were determined to have occurred • unsubstantiated, if the evidence was insufficient to make a final determination that they occurred • unfounded, if they were determined not to have occurred • investigation ongoing, if a final determination had not been made at time of data collection. Overall, inmate-on-inmate allegations of nonconsensual sexual violence were less likely to be substantiated than allegations of staff sexual misconduct. Based on allegations in State and Table 3. Allegations of sexual violence in Federal and State prisons, local jails, and private prisons and jails, 2005 State and Federal prisons Number Percent* Inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Staff sexual misconduct Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Local jails Number Percent* Private prisons and jails Number Percent* 1,443 163 582 442 236 100.0% 13.7 49.0 37.2 263 100.0% 32 15.7 94 46.1 78 38.2 32 34 7 13 2 12 100.0% 31.8 59.1 9.1 423 103 235 62 13 100.0% 25.8 58.8 15.5 57 100.0% 12 22.6 17 32.1 24 45.3 4 3 0 3 0 0 100.0% 0 100.0 0 1,829 195 867 243 519 100.0% 14.9 66.4 18.6 184 100.0% 53 36.5 50 34.5 42 29.0 39 29 6 18 5 0 100.0% 20.7 62.1 17.2 Staff sexual harassment 914 100.0% 39 100.0% 7 100.0% Substantiated 39 5.7 3 10.0 0 0 Unsubstantiated 478 69.4 12 40.0 7 100.0 Unfounded 172 25.0 15 50.0 0 0 Investigation ongoing 226 8 0 Note: Excludes facilities operated by the U.S. military, the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, tribal authorities and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. *Percents based on allegations for which investigations had been completed. During 2005 correctional authorities substantiated 885 incidents of sexual violence The survey of administrative records recorded 620 substantiated incidents of sexual violence. Taking into account sampling of local jails, private prisons or jails, and jails in Indian country, the estimated total for the Nation was 885. Relative to the number of inmates, there were 0.40 substantiated incidents of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates reported in 2005, down from the 0.55 per 1,000 inmates in adult facilities in 2004. Facility type Number of substantiated incidents of sexual violence Rate per National 1,000 estimate inmates Total 885 0.40 Prisons Public - Federal 41 0.26 Public - State 458 0.39 Private 24 0.24 Local jails Public 336 0.45 Private 13 0.78 Other adult facilities Indian country jails* 10 ^ Military-operated 2 0.77 ICE-operated 1 0.15 *Excludes facilities housing juveniles only. ^Too few cases to provide a reliable rate. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 5 Correctional authorities provided detail on 82% of substantiated incidents For the first time in the 2005 survey prison systems and sampled facilities were asked to provide detailed information on each substantiated incident of sexual violence. Using a separate incident form, the survey obtained incident-based data, providing a basis for an in-depth analysis of sexual violence. Data included details on the circumstances surrounding each incident, characteristics of victims and perpetrators, type of pressure or physical force, sanctions imposed and victim assistance. Incident-level data were reported on 510 of the 620 substantiated incidents (82%). More than two-thirds of the unreported incidents were in the Federal system (missing data on 35 incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence), New Hampshire (missing 23 incident reports), and Vermont (missing 16 reports on staff sexual harassment). An additional 25 substantiated incidents were missing from local jail reports. Because most systems and facilities reported fully, there was little evidence of any selection bias among the 510 incident reports. Data provided on substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence revealed that — • In 4% of the incidents more than one inmate was victimized (table 4). • In 7% of the incidents there was more than one perpetrator (table 5). • Males comprised 88% of the victims and 91% of the perpetrators in prison and jails. • 74% of victims in jail and 42% in prison were age 24 or younger; while 42% of perpetrators in jail and 66% in prison were age 30 or older. Table 4. Characteristics of victims in substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence, by type, 2005 All facilitiesa Prison 358 208 127 Number of victims 1 2 3 4 or more 95.8% 3.1 0.3 0.8 94.7% 3.4 0.5 1.4 96.9% 3.1 0 0 Genderb Male Female 88.4% 11.6 84.8% 15.2 92.4% 7.6 Ageb Under 18 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45 or older 7.7% 45.1 12.5 17.0 9.3 4.8 3.7 0.9% 41.4 15.8 18.1 11.2 6.5 6.0 20.6% 53.4 3.8 10.7 7.6 3.1 0.8 Race/Hispanic originb Whitec Blackc Hispanic Otherc,d 72.7% 11.9 9.3 6.1 78.1% 10.2 9.8 1.9 71.0% 11.5 3.8 13.7 a Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. b Based on characteristics of victims for whom gender (380), age (377), or race/Hispanic origin (377) were reported. c Excludes victims of Hispanic origin. dIncludes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. 6 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Number of victims and perpetrators by race/ Hispanic origin Perpetrator Victim White* Black* Hispanic Other* Total 171 152 65 13 White* 130 113 39 10 Black* 15 28 4 0 Hispanic 6 11 21 1 Other* 20 0 1 2 *Excludes persons of Hispanic origin. Table 5. Characteristics of perpetrators in substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence, by type, 2005 All facilitiesa Jail Number of incidents • Whites comprised 73% of the victims, 43% of the perpetrators; while blacks comprised 12% of victims, 39% of perpetrators. • 15% of perpetrators were Hispanic, compared to 9% of victims. • More than half of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence was interracial: 10% involved a white perpetrator and a nonwhite victim; 31% black perpetrators and a non-black victim; 11% a Hispanic perpetrator on a non-Hispanic victim (not shown). Prison Jail Number of perpetrators 1 2 3 4 or more 92.7% 3.6 1.4 2.3 92.8% 3.9 1.9 1.5 91.4% 3.9 0.8 3.9 Genderb Male Female 91.3% 8.7 85.7% 14.3 98.6% 1.4 Ageb Under 18 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45 or older 5.4% 20.1 14.9 14.9 14.7 18.0 11.9 0.5% 16.8 16.8 15.0 17.3 16.4 17.3 14.7% 30.1 13.2 9.6 6.6 19.9 5.9 Race/Hispanic originb Whitec Blackc Hispanic Otherc,d 43.0% 38.8 14.7 3.4 42.1% 42.1 10.0 5.9 48.2% 33.6 18.2 0 a Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. b Based on characteristics of perpetrators for whom gender (401), age (388), or race/Hispanic origin (381) were reported. c Excludes perpetrators of Hispanic origin. dIncludes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. Physical force or threat of force was used in 51% of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence Correctional authorities reported that force or threat of force was involved in about half of all incidents of inmate-oninmate sexual violence (table 6). In less than a third of the incidents no force was used or threatened. In other incidents of inmate sexual violence, victims were talked into it (18%), bribed/blackmailed (11%), or offered protection from other inmates (6%). Force was more common among incidents of nonconsensual sexual activity than among incidents of abusive sexual contacts. In nearly a third of nonconsensual sexual acts, the victim was physically held down or restrained. In a sixth, the victim was physically harmed or injured. In more than two-thirds of the inmateon-inmate incidents, the sexual violence occurred in the victim’s cell (59%) or in a dormitory (12%). In only 21% of the substantiated incidents did the sexual violence occur in a common area, such as a shower or a day room. In less than 9% of the incidents, the inmate-on-inmate sexual violence occurred in a program service area, such as in a storage room, hallway, laundry, cafeteria, kitchen or workshop. Incidents of inmate sexual violence were the most common (44%) in the evening between 6 p.m. and midnight and the least common (18%) overnight between midnight and 6 a.m. The most serious forms of inmate sexual violence (nonconsensual sexual acts) were most likely to have occurred in the evening (50%); while the least serious acts (abusive sexual contacts) were most likely to have occurred in the morning between 6 a.m. and noon (41%). In nearly 90% of the substantiated incidents of inmate sexual violence, the victim or another inmate reported the incident. In less than 11% of the incidents had a correctional officer made the initial report. In only 4% of the most serious incidents (nonconsensual sexual acts) had medical or health care staff reported the incident. Table 6. Circumstances surrounding substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence, by type, 2005 All facilities* Prison Number of incidents Type of pressure or force None Force/threat of force Threatened with physical harm Physically held down or restrained Physically harmed or injured Threatened with a weapon Persuasion or talked into it Bribery/blackmail Gave victim drugs/alcohol Offered protection from other inmates Jail Nonconsensual sexual acts Abusive sexual contacts 357 207 127 241 116 30.5% 50.7 25.1% 61.4 40.2% 39.4 17.8% 58.9 56.9% 32.8 22.4 32.4 10.2 26.1 15.5 28.3 32.9 23.6 32.4 19.0 12.6 13.0 13.4 16.5 5.2 4.2 18.5 10.9 0.3 6.8 15.9 7.7 0.5 0.8 15.7 11.8 0 5.8 22.4 12.9 0.4 0.9 10.3 6.9 0 5.9 6.8 5.5 8.3 0.9 Where occurred In victim's cell/room In perpetrator's cell/room In a dormitory In a common area In temporary holding area In a program service area Outside the facility While in transit 59.1% 3.9 12.1 20.7 0.3 8.7 1.1 0.3 58.7% 5.3 7.8 18.0 0 12.6 1.9 0.5 60.2% 0 17.3 25.8 0.8 3.1 0 0 59.2% 5.0 10.8 23.3 0 2.9 1.3 0.4 58.6% 1.7 15.4 15.5 0.9 20.7 0.9 0 Time of day 6 a.m. to noon Noon to 6 p.m. 6 p.m. to midnight Midnight to 6 a.m. 27.8% 20.5 44.0 18.4 22.0% 30.9 44.5 18.8 36.0% 4.8 42.4 20.0 21.5% 18.4 50.2 18.5 41.3% 24.8 31.2 18.2 Who reported the incident Victim 82.6% 80.2% 90.6% 84.2% 78.6% Another inmate 8.4 9.7 7.1 7.9 10.3 Family of victim 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.9 Correctional officer 10.6 12.1 6.3 10.8 10.3 Administrative staff 0.6 0 1.6 0.8 0 Medical/healthcare staff 2.8 2.4 1.6 4.1 0 Counselor/teacher 1.4 2.4 0 0.4 3.4 Chaplain/other religious official 0.3 0.5 0 0.4 0 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. *Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 7 Victims received physical injuries in 15% of substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence Knife or stab wounds and other internal injuries were not reported for any of the incidents. In most substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence victims were not physically injured (85%) (table 7). Anal or rectal tearing was reported in 6% of the incidents; less serious injuries, including bruises, black eyes, sprains, cuts, and scratches were reported in 11% of the incidents. In fewer than 1% of the incidents, victims received broken bones or were knocked unconscious. Victims received medical attention, counseling or mental health treatment in more than two-thirds of the incidents of nonconsensual sexual acts. Among the most serious incidents, 63% of the victims were given a medical examination; 27% were administered a rape kit; 17% were tested for HIV/AIDS; 17% were tested for other sexually transmitted diseases; and 33% were provided counseling or mental health treatment. Table 7. Impact on victims and perpetrators in substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence, by type, 2005 All Victim injured No Yesb Broken bones Anal/vaginal tearing Teeth chipped/knocked out Knocked unconscious Bruises, black eye, sprains, cuts, scratches, swelling Medical follow up for victim Given medical examination Administered rape kit Tested for HIV/AIDS Tested for other STD Provided counseling or mental health treatment None of the above NonconAbusive sensual sexual sexual acts contacts facilitiesa Prison Jail 84.6% 15.4 0.3 6.1 0.3 0.3 80.0% 20.0 0.5 5.4 0 0.5 95.7% 4.3 0 2.6 0.9 0 11.0 15.6 53.4% 19.0 12.0 11.8 58.9% 21.3 14.0 14.0 42.5% 8.7 6.3 5.5 63.3% 26.7 17.0 16.6 33.3% 3.4 1.7 1.7 34.9 35.7 43.5 29.0 20.3 46.9 32.9 31.7 39.3 43.6 44.0% 8.7 9.0 10.7 4.8 31.7 46.6% 13.2 3.2 17.5 2.6 30.7 40.2% 2.0 18.6 0.0 1.0 38.2 49.3% 9.1 10.5 12.3 6.0 23.2 30.3% 7.8 5.6 6.7 2.2 52.8 2.6 78.4% 21.6 0.4 9.3 0 0.4 15.0 96.6% 3.4 0 0 0.9 0 3.4 Change in housing/custody for victimc Placed in administrative segregation or protective custody Placed in medical unit Confined to own cell/room Transferred to another facility Other (reported after release/transfer) None of the above Sanction imposed on perpetrator Solitary/disciplinary 70.8% 84.5% 55.9% 71.6% 69.6% Confined to own cell/room 27.9 21.8 40.2 25.1 33.0 Placed in higher custody 20.1 16.6 26.8 27.3 5.4 Transferred to another facility 18.9 25.4 9.4 17.7 21.2 Loss of good time 13.4 22.8 0 13.9 12.5 Given extra work 0.6 0.5 0 0.4 0.9 Loss of privileges 20.7 21.2 22.0 21.6 18.8 Legal action 51.3 31.1 83.5 57.6 39.3 Arrested 12.2 4.1 20.5 15.9 4.5 Referred for prosecution 45.6 28.5 77.3 50.6 34.8 Given new sentence 4.1 1.0 9.4 6.1 0 Disciplinary report issued 4.7 8.3 0 6.1 1.8 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. a Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. bThe categories "knife or stab wounds" and "internal injuries" were not marked in any incident. cThe category "given a higher custody level within the facility" was not marked in any incident. 8 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Half of victims of nonconsensual sexual acts were placed in protective custody or administrative segregation The most common response following a reported incident of sexual violence was to place the victim in administrative segregation or protective custody (44%) or to transfer the victim to another facility (11%). Given differing housing options, prison authorities were more likely than jail authorities to move the victims rather than confine them to their cell/room. Victims of abusive sexual contacts were the least likely to be moved, with over half (53%) having no change in housing. About a third of the victims of nonconsensual sexual acts were confined to their cell (11%) or had no change in their housing (23%). Most inmate perpetrators received legal sanctions or solitary confinement • A legal sanction, including arrest, referral for prosecution, or new sentence, was imposed on perpetrators in 31% of the substantiated incidents in prisons; 83% of the incidents in jails. • Perpetrators were referred for prosecution in more than half of the substantiated incidents of nonconsensual sexual acts; in a third of the incidents of abusive sexual contacts. • Perpetrators were moved to solitary confinement in 72% of the incidents of nonconsensual sexual acts and in 70% of the incidents of abusive sexual contacts. • Perpetrators also received other sanctions, including confinement to own cell/room (28%), loss of privileges (21%), placement in a higher custody level (20%), or transfer to another facility (19%). Two-thirds of incidents of staff sexual misconduct with inmates were reported to be romantic Other data reported on substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment revealed that — Female staff implicated in staff sexual misconduct in prisons; males in local jails The survey collected data on 344 substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment during 2005. In two-thirds of these incidents, correctional authorities determined that staff had a romantic relationship with the inmate (table 8). Although legally all sexual relationships between staff and inmates are considered nonconsensual, fewer than 15% of the substantiated incidents involved physical force, abuse of power or pressure by staff. • In more than half the incidents, either the victim (32%) or another inmate (26%) reported the misconduct (table 9). • In a third of the incidents, correctional officers (18%) or administrative staff (16%) reported the incident. In 10% of the incidents, the misconduct was reported anonymously. • Most incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment occurred outside of the inmate’s living area, in a program area (53%), outside of the facility (12%), or in a common area (10%). • In prisons, incidents of staff sexual misconduct occurred most often between noon and 6 p.m. (50%); in jails, incidents occurred more evenly throughout the day. • In 5% of the incidents more than one staff member was involved in the sexual misconduct. • In 10% of the incidents more than one inmate was involved. Characteristics of victims and perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct and harassment differed among prisons and jail facilities: Coercion, including force, pressure, unwanted touching, indecent exposure, and harassment, was more common among incidents in jails (43%) than in prisons (26%). • In State and Federal prisons 67% of the victims of staff misconduct were male, while 62% of the perpetrators were female (tables 10 and 11). • In local jails 78% of the victims were females; 87% of the perpetrators, male. • 47% of the prison staff involved in sexual misconduct and harassment were age 40 or older; compared to 27% of the jail staff. • In prisons 69% of the perpetrators were white, 25% black, and 3% Hispanic. • In jails 74% of the perpetrators were white, 21%, black, and 4% Hispanic. Table 8. Characteristics of substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility, 2005 Table 9. Circumstances surrounding substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility, 2005 Characteristic All facilities* Prison Jail Circumstance All facilitiesa Prison Jail Number of incidents 344 208 111 Nature of the incident Romantic Sexual harassment Unwanted touching Indecent exposure Pressure/abuse of power Physical force 68.3% 10.9 10.3 5.3 14.1 0.6 73.6% 12.0 9.6 4.8 10.6 1.0 56.8% 10.9 10.8 7.2 21.6 0 Number of staff involved 1 2 95.0% 5.0 95.7% 4.3 92.8% 7.2 Who reported the incident Victim Another inmate Family of victim Correctional officer Administrative staff Medical/healthcare staff Instructor/teacher/counselor Chaplain/other religious official Other (anonymous/letter) 31.9% 25.8 0.9 17.6 15.8 2.4 0.9 0.3 9.7 24.9% 28.9 0.5 18.8 16.2 2.5 1.5 0.5 11.7 43.9% 26.2 1.9 11.2 18.7 0 0 0 4.7 Where occurredb In victim's cell/room In a dormitory In a common area In temporary holding area In a program service area Outside the facility Other/unknown 14.0% 6.7 10.1 0.6 52.6 12.5 9.7 8.9% 8.9 7.3 0.5 57.3 13.0 12.5 26.1% 3.6 17.3 0.9 40.5 12.7 2.7 Number of victims 1 90.1% 92.8% 84.7% 2 8.1 4.8 14.4 3 0.6 1.0 0 4 or more 1.2 1.5 0.9 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. *Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. Time of day 6 a.m. to noon 32.4% 37.0% 30.5% Noon to 6 p.m. 41.4 50.0 29.5 6 p.m. to midnight 36.8 36.4 32.4 Midnight to 6 a.m. 18.5 16.9 23.6 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. a Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. bThe category "In transit" was not marked in any incident. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 9 Table 10. Characteristics of staff involved in staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility, 2005 All facilitiesa Prison Jail Genderb Male Female Ageb 24 or younger 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54 55 or older 54.3% 45.7 37.7% 62.3 86.6% 13.4 12.7% 14.7 15.9 19.0 14.1 18.2 5.5 10.4% 13.3 13.7 15.2 13.7 25.1 8.5 10.5% 14.9 21.9 25.4 17.5 8.8 0.9 Race/Hispanic originb Whitec 68.5% 69.4% 74.4% 23.5 25.4 21.4 Blackc Hispanic 4.3 2.9 4.3 3.7 2.4 0 Otherc,d Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. aIncludes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. bThe number of staff involved totaled 358. Gender was reported for 350 staff; age for 347; and race/Hispanic origin for 349. c Excludes staff of Hispanic origin. d Includes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. Table 11. Characteristics of inmates involved in staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility, 2005 Among victims of staff sexual misconduct, white inmates were overrepresented compared with the general inmate population. Non-Hispanic whites comprised 57% of the inmates involved in staff misconduct, compared to 36% of all prison and jail inmates at midyear 2005. (See Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2005, NCJ 213133.) Non-Hispanic blacks comprised 27% of inmates involved in staff misconduct; 40% of all inmates nationwide. Hispanic inmates were 10% of the victims of staff misconduct compared to 20% of the inmate population. Over two-thirds of perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct or harassment were correctional officers Most substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment involved correctional officers — 57% of the incidents in prisons; 89% of those in jails (table 12). In prisons, nearly 16% of perpetrators of staff misconduct were maintenance and other facility support staff, including groundskeepers, janitors, cooks, and drivers. An additional 10% of perpetrators in prisons were medical or health care staff, including counselors, doctors, dentists, nurses, psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and medical assistants. In both prisons and jails, about 13% of the staff perpetrators of sexual misconduct or harassment were contract employees or vendors. Inmates involved in staff sexual misconduct often transferred or placed in segregation In 27% of the substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct the inmates involved were transferred to another facility; in 20% of the incidents they were placed in administrative segregation or protective custody (table 13). In incidents involving a romantic relationship between inmate and staff, more than half of the inmates were either transferred (30%) or placed in administrative segregation (22%) (not shown). All facilitiesa Prison Gender Male Female 52.0% 48.0 67.5% 32.5 21.9% 78.1 Ageb Under 18 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45 or older In incidents involving staff coercion, about a third of the victims were either transferred (20%) or placed in segregation (15%). 0.6% 17.6 28.5 22.9 17.3 6.7 6.4 0% 12.8 25.1 27.5 18.0 8.5 8.1 1.7% 24.4 26.9 18.5 18.5 5.0 5.0 In most substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct (74%), victims received no medical followup, counseling, or mental health treatment. Excluding incidents involving romantic relationships, victims in 15% of the nonconsensual acts were given a medical examination and 19% were provided counseling or mental health treatment. Race/Hispanic originb Whitec Blackc Hispanic Otherc,d 56.8% 26.9 9.8 6.5 54.2% 32.1 9.4 4.2 66.7% 24.0 6.2 3.1 Jail b a Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. b The number of victims of staff misconduct totaled 390: gender was reported for 367; age for 358; and race/Hispanic origin for 368. cExcludes inmates of Hispanic origin. dIncludes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. 10 Table 12. Type of staff involved in staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility, 2005 All facilities* Type of staff involved Full/part-time employee Contract employee/vendor Volunteer/intern 86.7% 13.3 0.6 Prison 86.2% 13.8 1.0 Jail 87.9% 12.1 0 Position of staff involved Administrator 1.8% 2.9% 0% Correctional officer 68.7 57.0 89.1 Clerical 3.5 3.9 3.6 Maintenance 10.9 15.9 0.9 Medical/health care 6.2 9.7 0.9 Educational 2.6 3.9 0.9 Other program staff 1.5 2.4 0 Other 6.8 5.3 9.1 *Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Nearly 90% of perpetrators of staff misconduct arrested, referred for prosecution, or discharged Correctional authorities indicated that in 82% of the substantiated incidents staff had been discharged or resigned; 45% arrested or referred for prosecution, and 17% were disciplined, transferred, or demoted. Among the multiple types of sanctions imposed on staff, discharge or resignation was the most common — 30% of the incidents in prison and 55% of those in jails. Many staff chose to resign (43%) rather than be terminated. In incidents involving a romantic relationship between an inmate and staff, 90% of staff were discharged or resigned (not shown). In incidents involving coercion, 64% of staff lost their jobs and 53% were arrested or referred for prosecution. Methodology The 2005 Survey of Sexual Violence was based on seven separate samples, corresponding to the different facilities covered under the act. The following samples were drawn: 1. The survey included all 50 State adult prison systems and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Prison administrators were directed to report only on incidents of sexual violence that occurred within publicly operated adult facilities. 2. A sample of 32 privately operated prison facilities was drawn to represent a 10% sample of the 319 private prisons identified in the 2000 Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities and updated for new construction and closures since 2000. Facilities were sorted by region and average daily population and then sampled with probabilities proportionate to size. One sampled facility had closed. 3. Publicly operated jail facilities were selected based on data reported in the 2004 Deaths in Custody collection. Jurisdictions were sorted into 6 strata, based on their average daily popula- Table 13. Impact on inmate and staff in substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, 2005 All facilitiesa Prison Medical followup for inmate Given medical examination Administered rape kit Tested for HIV/AIDS Tested for other STD Provided counseling or mental health treatment None of the above 14.7% 7.4 1.5 2.5 14.2 74.2 11.6% 2.6 0.5 1.6 17.4 78.4 17.1% 11.8 1.8 2.7 10.9 67.6 Any change in housing/custody for inmate Placed in administratve segregation or protective custody Placed in medical unit Confined to own cell/room Given a higher custody level within facility Transferred to another facility Otherb None of the above 19.7% 2.2 5.1 4.5 26.8 11.1 36.3 26.3% 0 1.1 4.7 25.3 7.4 42.6 3.0% 4.0 11.1 1.0 35.4 17.2 28.3 Jail Sanctions on staff Legal sanction 44.7% 37.0% 62.7% Arrested 27.9 16.8 48.6 Referred for prosecution 34.3 34.6 35.1 Loss of job 81.8 81.7 79.3 Discharged 41.3 30.3 55.5 Staff resigned (prior to investigation) 30.1 32.7 27.0 Staff resigned (after investigation) 13.2 19.7 3.6 Other sanction 17.0 16.8 19.8 Reprimanded/disciplined 11.8 12.5 11.8 Demoted/diminished responsibilities 3.5 1.0 8.1 Transferred to another facility 2.3 3.4 0 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. a Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. b Includes "stayed in same unit," "transferred elsewhere in facility," and "incident reported after release." tions, and then sampled systematically, to provide a representative national sample. A total of 72 jurisdictions were sampled with certainty (corresponding to the largest jurisdiction in each State plus 26 jurisdictions selected due to their large size). An additional 278 jurisdictions were selected from 4 strata, with probabilities of selection proportionate to size. Jail administrators were directed to report on all publicly operated facilities within their jurisdiction. Of the 350 selected facilities, 3 had closed. 4. A sample of 5 privately operated jails was also selected based on the data reported in the 2004 Deaths in Custody collection. The 38 private facilities were sorted by region and their average daily population during 2004. Facilities were selected systematically using a random start and a fixed sampling interval. 5. Three additional samples of other correctional facilities were drawn to represent: a) jails in Indian country (7 facilities holding adults were selected from a total of 68 based on probabilities proportionate to size); b) military-operated facilities (all of the 59 facilities operated by the Armed Services in the continental U.S.); c) 14 facilities operated by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Data for each correctional system and sampled facility are displayed in the Appendix tables. In each table a measure of population size has been provided as a basis of comparison; however, the survey results should not be used to rank systems or facilities. Variations in the number of allegations and substantiated incidents may reflect differences in definitions and reporting criteria, as well as variations in procedures for recording allegations and in the thoroughness of subsequent investigations. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 11 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics *NCJ~214646* PRESORTED STANDARD POSTAGE & FEES PAID DOJ/BJS Permit No. G-91 Washington, DC 20531 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 The Bureau of Justice Statistics is the statistical agency of the U.S. Department of Justice. Jeffrey L. Sedgwick is director. Allen J. Beck and Paige M. Harrison wrote this report. Laura Maruschak, Seri Palla, and Maura Spiegelman verified the report. Tina Dorsey, Carolyn Williams, and Marianne W. Zawitz produced and edited the report. Jayne Robinson prepared the report for publication. Timothy A. Hughes and Paige M. Harrison, under the supervision of Allen J. Beck, designed the survey, devel- This report in portable document format and in ASCII and its related statistical data and tables—including five appendix tables—are available at the BJS World Wide Web Internet site: <http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/> 12 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 oped the questionnaires, and monitored data collection and data processing. Pamela H. Butler, Greta B. Clark, and Nicole D. Simpson carried out data collection and processing, under the supervision of Charlene M. Sebold, Governments Division, Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. Patricia D. Torreyson, Pearl E. Chase, and D. Alicia Gumbs assisted in data collection. Suzanne M. Dorinski drew the facility samples and provided sampling weights. July 2006, NCJ 214646 Office of Justice Programs Partnerships for Safer Communities http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov Appendix table 1a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by State or Federal prison authorities, by type, 2005 Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Jurisdiction Prisoners in custody, Allega6/30/2005a tions Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Investigation SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded ongoing InvestiAllega- SubUnsubgation tions stantiated stantiated Unfounded ongoing Total 1,337,473 1,443 163 582 442 236 423 103 235 62 13 Federalb State 156,643 1,180,830 25 1,418 5 158 / 582 / 442 / 236 40 383 30 73 / 235 / 62 / 13 25,161 3,248 27,204 12,568 161,709 9 1 17 7 59 1 1 6 1 4 4 0 4 3 28 4 0 6 1 16 0 0 1 2 11 1 / 6 0 16 0 / 2 0 2 0 / 1 0 8 1 / 3 0 0 0 / 0 0 6 Colorado Connecticutc Delaware Florida Georgiac 16,997 19,087 6,916 79,478 43,057 27 21 2 124 37 15 0 0 0 0 8 20 0 101 0 4 1 2 14 4 0 0 0 9 33 11 / 1 19 / 8 / 0 0 / 3 / 0 14 / 0 / 1 5 / 0 / 0 0 / Hawaiic Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa 3,931 6,136 44,669 22,304 8,578 8 15 17 27 11 4 3 1 3 0 3 5 14 12 5 1 7 0 11 3 0 0 2 1 3 / 11 0 3 8 / 5 0 0 0 / 6 0 1 0 / 0 0 2 8 / 0 0 0 0 Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland 9,068 11,366 16,667 2,063 23,086 25 3 10 4 15 1 0 1 3 2 7 2 6 0 10 16 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 3 17 10 1 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 14 4 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Massachusetts Michiganc Minnesota Mississippi Missouri 10,159 48,535 7,996 11,643 31,000 10 48 12 1 36 2 19 1 0 1 2 29 2 1 25 5 0 9 0 5 1 0 0 0 5 21 / 1 0 21 9 / 1 0 4 2 / 0 0 11 10 / 0 0 2 0 / 0 0 4 Montana Nebraskac Nevadac New Hampshirec,d,e New Jerseyc 1,911 4,308 11,155 2,456 26,353 2 10 14 18 3 2 0 0 18 0 0 0 7 / 0 0 10 2 / 2 0 0 5 / 1 3 / / / / 2 / / / / 1 / / / / 0 / / / / 0 / / / / New Mexico New York North Carolinac North Dakota Ohio 3,757 63,234 36,477 1,287 42,346 0 28 20 1 71 0 1 7 0 11 0 14 12 0 10 0 0 1 1 50 0 13 0 0 0 0 1 / 8 27 0 1 / 4 12 0 0 / 1 6 0 0 / 3 9 0 0 / 0 0 Oklahomaa Oregon Pennsylvaniac Rhode Island South Carolinad 17,196 12,769 40,649 3,364 23,057 23 25 16 1 0 3 4 6 1 0 10 15 10 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 3 / 3 0 1 0 / 1 0 1 3 / 1 0 0 0 / 1 0 0 0 / 0 0 South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermonte 3,385 14,303 141,247 4,775 1,601 6 25 511 14 19 1 3 10 3 1 3 12 145 8 17 2 7 225 3 1 0 3 131 0 0 7 7 143 7 20 2 2 5 3 1 3 2 131 2 18 2 1 7 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 Virginiae Washington West Virginia Wisconsinf Wyoming 29,445 16,126 3,966 21,850 1,187 7 25 3 24 6 1 7 2 6 2 0 12 0 13 3 4 5 0 4 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 / 3 0 0 1 / 1 0 0 0 / 2 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California /Not reported. inmates in private facilities. Counts were based on National Prisoners Statistics (NPS-1A), 2005. bAllegations were reported for occurrences in 2005; findings may include cases from previous years. c Allegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts. d Allegations limited to substantiated occurrences only. e Allegations limited to completed acts only. f Reports of abusive sexual contacts were based on a broader category of inmate sexual misconduct. aExcludes Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 13 Appendix table 1b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by State or Federal prison authorities, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Unfounded Investigation ongoing 1,829 195 867 243 519 914 39 478 172 226 203 1,626 6 189 80 787 5 238 107 412 / 914 / 39 / 478 / 172 / 226 2 1 63 29 51 0 1 3 5 6 0 0 35 4 22 2 0 24 15 4 0 0 1 5 19 1 0 1 2 37 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 22 1 0 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 4 21 19 2 264 226 9 0 0 5 0 2 15 0 232 87 4 0 2 15 0 6 4 0 12 139 8 / 1 77 218 0 / 1 0 0 1 / 0 67 114 5 / 0 1 0 2 / 0 9 104 Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa 8 10 0 35 19 3 3 0 15 4 1 2 0 9 7 1 3 0 10 6 3 2 0 1 2 1 4 0 13 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland 48 13 73 2 17 5 5 8 1 0 25 5 44 0 12 8 3 7 1 1 10 0 14 0 4 12 0 48 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 12 0 33 2 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 7 1 0 Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri 70 35 19 6 54 4 3 2 5 2 12 7 8 0 41 21 19 6 0 4 33 6 3 1 7 6 245 0 0 42 0 1 0 0 3 2 118 0 0 31 1 126 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 9 0 2 1 6 9 0 1 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 / / 5 3 0 / / 1 1 0 / / 2 2 0 / / 2 0 0 / / 0 0 New Mexico New York North Carolinaa,c North Dakota Ohio 0 138 14 4 18 0 13 13 1 2 0 60 0 0 14 0 0 1 3 1 0 65 0 0 1 0 20 / 0 22 0 2 / 0 0 0 8 / 0 17 0 0 / 0 0 0 10 / 0 5 Oklahomaa Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolinac 19 35 39 12 1 5 13 7 3 1 11 0 24 6 0 3 14 0 3 0 0 8 8 0 0 / 3 8 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 5 0 0 / 3 0 0 0 / 0 3 0 0 South Dakota Tennessee Texasa Utah Vermont 4 20 54 5 15 1 8 4 0 4 1 7 22 2 4 2 2 1 3 7 0 3 27 0 0 0 4 / 2 115 0 1 / 1 16 0 1 / 1 29 0 0 / 0 6 0 2 / 0 64 Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming 24 38 1 77 3 5 5 0 7 1 4 18 1 35 1 8 4 0 27 0 7 11 0 8 1 1 2 0 4 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Jurisdiction Total Federala,b State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticuta Delaware Florida Georgia Montana Nebraskaa Nevadaa New Hampshire New Jersey Allega- Subtions stantiated Unsubstantiated /Not reported. aReports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. b Excludes 5 cases disposed of administratively. cReports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated allegations only. dReports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded in a central database. 14 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Allegations Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Appendix table 2a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Jurisdiction and facility Total Average daily population, 2005 Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded 328,655 263 32 94 78 57 12 17 24 16 160 71 207 44 94 6 835 1,433 83 2 297 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alaska Unalaska Citya,b 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arizona Maricopa County Mohave County Pinal Countya 9,515 441 698 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 / 0 0 / 2 0 / 0 0 / 7 227 66 40 857 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / 0 0 / / / / 0 0 / / / / 0 0 / / / / 0 0 76 1,627 3,029 2,198 307 19,488 215 6,164 3,268 4,123 5,592 5,172 503 4,525 599 10 1,061 1,284 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 12 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 2 2 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 Colorado Adams Countya Denver Citya,d,e Gilpin Countya La Plata Countya Larimer Countya Mesa Countya Sedgwick Countyb 1,197 2,336 53 175 528 365 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / / 0 / / / / / / 0 / / / / / / 0 / / / / / / 0 District of Columbiac 3,588 3 0 2 0 / / / / Florida Bradford County Broward Countyc,e Charlotte County Dade Countya Hillsborough Countya Indian River County Jacksonville Citya Orange Countya Palm Beach County 226 5,482 471 6,772 4,637 627 3,420 3,706 2,789 0 3 0 3 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / / 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / / 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / / 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / / 0 Alabama Attalla City Autauga County Bibb County Chilton County Crenshaw Countya Franklin County Lipscomb City Madison County Mobile Countyb Pickens County Pleasant Grove City Russell County Arkansas Brinkley Citya Craighead Countya Dallas Countyc Drew Countya Pulaski County Regionalb Warren City California Calaveras County Contra Costa Countya Fresno County Kern County Kings County Los Angeles County Nevada County Orange County Riverside County Sacramento County San Bernardino County San Diego Countya San Luis Obispo County Santa Clara Countya Santa Cruz Countya,d Sierra County Solano Countya Stanislaus County Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 15 Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Jurisdiction and facility Average daily population, 2005 Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded Florida (continued) Pinellas Countya Polk County St. Lucie County Sarasota Countyb Seminole County Taylor County Volusia County Wakulla County 3,317 2,724 1,073 873 933 123 1,575 218 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Georgia Augusta-Richmond County Ben Hill County Butts County Carroll County Cor. Inst. Carroll Countya Cobb Countya Decatur County DeKalb Countya East Point City Forsyth County Fulton Countya Gwinnett County Cor. Inst.a Gwinnett County Lowndes County Milledgeville City Monroe County Muscogee Countya,e Peach County Polk Countya Taylor Countya Troup Countyd Upson County 1,087 116 118 230 478 2,265 296 3,032 62 136 3,200 723 1,766 645 4 128 598 70 150 27 428 151 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 0 25 111 579 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Illinois Adams County Cook County Jackson Countya Jo Daviess County Kankakee County Stark County Will Countya Woodford County 106 9,854 108 25 385 6 568 42 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 Indiana Clinton Countya Floyd County Greene Countya Hendricks County Lake Countya Marion Countya Perry County Porter Countya Shelby Countya Tippecanoe Countya Vermillion County 118 273 83 276 970 2,584 38 493 187 504 78 0 15 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 / / 0 / / / 0 / / / 0 / / 0 / / / 0 / / / 0 / / 0 / / / 0 / / / 0 / / 0 / / / 0 915 8 7 380 151 9 971 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / 0 / / Idaho Adams County Bingham County Canyon County Iowa Buchanan County Davis Countya Fremont County Linn Countyc Marshall County Mills Countya Polk Countya 16 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Jurisdiction and facility Kansas Galena City Geary County Kingman Countya Ottawa County Sedgwick County Stevens Countya Average daily population, 2005 Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded 4 79 8 59 1,501 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 3 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 1 / 0 0 / 0 0 / Kentucky Campbell County Daviess Countya Hardin County Laurel County Louisville-Jefferson Countya Mason County Meade County Ohio Countya Oldham Countyc,d Whitley Countyf 294 650 523 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 1,830 119 142 47 90 90 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 Louisiana Amite City Avoyelles Parish Calcasieu Parish Iberia Parisha Jennings City Orleans Parisha Ouachita Parisha,e St. Charles Parisha St. James Parish St. Landry Parish Terrebonne Parishc Washington Parish 12 1,000 1,190 450 41 3,969 850 508 91 211 616 179 0 0 5 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 / / / 0 3 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / / 0 0 / 0 0 0 1 / 0 / / / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / / 0 3 / 0 413 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / Maryland Baltimore City Montgomery County Prince Georges County St. Mary’s County 3,710 978 1,256 306 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Massachusetts Hampden County Hampshire County Middlesex Countya Plymouth Countya 1,607 270 1,182 1,514 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 / 0 1 1 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 Michigan Delta Countya,d,e Dickson County Genesee County Jackson County Kalkaska Countya Livingston Countya Mackinac Countya Macomb County Monroe County Van Buren Countya,d Wayne County 89 77 575 410 47 217 29 1,409 369 178 2,712 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / / / 3 0 / 2 / 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / / / 1 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / / / 2 0 / 2 Minnesota Hennepin County Houston County Nicollet County Winona County Wright County 552 12 34 41 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mississippi Attalla County Claiborne County Harrison Countya,d 32 10 925 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / Maine Cumberland County Oxford Countya Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 17 Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Jurisdiction and facility Mississippi (continued) Kemper-Neshoba County Regional Leflore County Stone County Washington County Wayne Countya Average daily population, 2005 Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded 52 130 344 74 49 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 76 22 501 12 41 132 123 3 136 1,572 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 5 40 430 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 / / 1 / / 0 / / 0 / Nebraska Cedar County Douglas Countya Fillmore Countya,d,e Seward Countya 3 1,034 3 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 / / / 0 / / / 0 / / / Nevada Clark County Lander County Washoe County 3,296 22 1,077 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 524 180 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / New Jersey Bergen County Essex County Hudson County Middlesex County Ocean Countya Salem County 989 2,138 2,064 1,152 471 270 0 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 2 / 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 2 3 0 / 0 New Mexico Bernalillo County Lea County Rio Arriba Countya San Juan County Sierra County 2,239 289 120 598 60 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 / 2 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 2 0 1 0 / 0 0 714 100 1,581 13,420 672 145 320 162 1 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 276 88 511 113 73 145 2,178 517 200 1,682 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 / 0 1 0 / / / / / 0 / 0 0 0 / / / / / 0 / 0 0 0 / / / / / 0 / 0 1 0 / / / / / 0 Missouri Callaway County Clinton County Greene County Howard County Howell County Kansas City Phelps County Reynolds County St. Francois Countya St. Louis Citya Montana Glacier Countya,e Lake County Yellowstone Countya,e New Hampshire Hillsborough County Merrimack Countya New York Erie County Holding Center Livingston County Nassau Countye New York Citya Onondaga County Oswego County Rensselaer Countya Steuben County North Carolina Alamance Countya Beaufort County Cumberland County Dare County Greene Countya Harnett County Mecklenburg Countya New Hanover Countya Randolph Countya Wake County 18 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Jurisdiction and facility North Dakota Cass County Grand Forks County Mercer County Average daily population, 2005 Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Allega- SubUnsubtions stantiated stantiated Unfounded 223 113 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ohio Ashland Countya Brown County Butler Countya Carroll County Clark Countya Franklin County Greene Countya Hamilton County Highland Heights City Mahoning County Muskingum County Richland County 95 46 766 41 227 2,370 370 2,101 1 428 169 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 Oklahoma Coal County Comanche Countya Custer Countya Eufaula Citya Johnston County Le Flore Countyb,e Oklahoma Countya Okmulgee Countya 15 230 75 3 41 67 2,800 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / 0 / / / 0 0 / / 0 / / / 0 0 / / 0 / / / 0 0 / / Oregon Deschutes County Josephine County Lane County Multnomah Countya 231 130 572 1,495 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / Pennsylvania Allegheny County Cumberland Countyd Dauphin County Greene Countya Lebanon County Luzerne County Montgomery County Philadelphia City Pike County Union Countyd 2,394 350 1,265 112 449 753 1,543 7,792 279 60 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 243 1,466 34 609 98 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 393 0 0 0 0 / / / / 34 560 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / / / / 82 203 47 294 1,052 112 2,250 114 46 2,519 575 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / / South Carolina Beaufort County Charleston County Edgefield Countya Lexington Countya,d,e Pickens Countyc Sumter-Lee County Regionala South Dakota Charles Mix Countya Minnehaha Countya Tennessee De Kalb County Dickson County Fentress County Greene County Knox County Lincoln Countyc Nashville-Davidson County Rhea County Scott County Shelby Countya Sullivan Countya Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 19 Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Jurisdiction and facility Average daily population, Allega2005 tions Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded Texas Bell County Bexar County Brown Countya Burleson County Cameron County Comal Countya Crane Countya Dallas Countya El Paso County Falls Countya Fort Bend County Galveston County Grayson Countya Gregg County Hale Countya Harris County Hutchison Countya Johnson Countya Kemah City Lamar County Live Oak County Lubbock County Medina County Robertson County Tarrant Countya Travis Countya Zavala County 645 3,871 155 60 968 263 12 7,629 2,110 93 835 882 463 512 118 8,730 57 480 1 174 25 731 85 28 3,299 2,629 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 1 / / 0 0 0 2 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 1 / / 0 0 0 2 0 0 / / 0 Utah Carbon County Rich County Salt Lake County Washington Countya 76 1 1,913 450 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 / Virginia Albemarle-Charlottesville Regional Augusta Countya Henrico County Loudon County Newport News Citya Norfolk City Pamunkey Regional Rappahannock Regionala Richmond City Shenandoah County Virginia Peninsula Regional Warren Countya 446 223 1,143 155 656 1,664 411 964 1,378 75 381 119 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 / Washington King Countya Pacific County Pierce Countya Spokane Countya Thurston Countya Whatcom Countya 2,303 34 1,298 621 432 263 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 / 0 / / / / / 0 / / / / / 0 / / / / / 0 / / / / 486 459 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / West Virginia Kanawha County Regional Raleigh County Regionala 20 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Jurisdiction and facility Wisconsin Marathon County Milwaukee County Milwaukee County House of Cor.a Polk County Richland County Sawyer County Washington County Waukesha County Wyoming Albany Countyc,f Converse Countya Natrona Countya Average daily population, 2005 Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded 293 863 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2,327 108 27 30 202 563 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 1 0 1 3 / 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 0 3 73 35 305 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / / / / / / / / / / / / Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). /Not reported. a Allegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts. bNumber of inmates confined on December 31, 2005. c Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database. dAllegations limited to substantiated occurrences only. e Allegations limited to completed acts only. f Number of inmates confined on June 30, 2005. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 21 Appendix table 2b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Total Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded 184 53 50 42 39 3 12 15 Alabama Attalla City Autauga County Bibb Countya Chilton County Crenshaw Countya Franklin County Lipscomb City Madison County Mobile County Pickens County Pleasant Grove City Russell County 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alaska Unalaska Cityb 0 0 0 0 / / / / Arizona Maricopa County Mohave County Pinal Countya 9 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / Arkansas Brinkley City Craighead Countya,c Dallas Countyb,d Drew County Pulaski County Regional Warren City 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / / 1 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / / 1 0 0 California Calaveras County Contra Costa Countya Fresno County Kern County Kings County Los Angeles County Nevada County Orange County Riverside County Sacramento County San Bernardino County San Diego County San Luis Obispo County Santa Clara County Santa Cruz County Sierra County Solano County Stanislaus Countya,c 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 / 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 / Colorado Adams County Denver Citya Gilpin Countya La Plata County Larimer County Mesa County Sedgwick Countya 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 1 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 1 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 / District of Columbia 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 / 0 5 / 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 1 / 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 2 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 Florida Bradford County Broward Countyb Charlotte County Dade County Hillsborough Countya Indian River County Jacksonville City Orange County Palm Beach County Pinellas County Polk County 22 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Florida (continued) Sarasota County Seminole County Taylor County Volusia County Wakulla County Georgia Augusta-Richmond County Ben Hill County Butts County Carroll County Cor. Inst. Carroll Countya Cobb County Decatur County DeKalb Countya East Point City Forsyth County Fulton County Gwinnett County Cor. Inst. Gwinnett County Lowndes County Milledgeville City Monroe County Muscogee Countya,c Peach County Polk Countya Taylor Countya Troup County Upson Countya 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 1 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 1 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / Idaho Adams County Bingham County Canyon County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Illinois Adams County Cook County Jackson County Jo Daviess County Kankakee County Stark County Will Countya Woodford County 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 Indiana Clinton Countya Floyd Countya Greene Countya Hendricks County Lake County Marion County Perry County Porter Countyd Shelby Countya Tippecanoe Countya Vermillion County 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 1 / / 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 1 / / 0 Iowa Buchanan County Davis County Fremont County Linn Countya Marshall County Mills Countya Polk County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 23 Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Kansas Galena City Geary County Kingman County Ottawa County Sedgwick County Stevens Countya 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / Kentucky Campbell County Daviess County Hardin Countya Laurel County Louisville-Jefferson Countya Mason County Meade County Ohio Countya Oldham Countyc Whitley County 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 Louisiana Amite Citya Avoyelles Parish Calcasieu Parish Iberia Parisha Jennings City Orleans Parisha Ouachita Parisha St. Charles Parish St. James Parisha St. Landry Parish Terrebonne Parish Washington Parisa 0 0 3 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / Maine Cumberland County Oxford County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maryland Baltimore City Montgomery County Prince Georges County St. Mary's County 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Massachusetts Hampden Countya Hampshire County Middlesex County Plymouth Countya,c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / Michigan Delta Countya Dickson County Genesee County Jackson County Kalkaska County Livingston Countya Mackinac County Macomb County Monroe County Van Buren Countya,c Wayne County 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 Minnesota Hennepin County Houston County Nicollet Countya Winona County Wright County 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 24 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Mississippi Attalla County Claiborne County Harrison Countya,c Kemper-Neshoba County Regionala Leflore County Stone County Washington County Wayne County 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 Missouri Callaway County Clinton County Greene County Howard County Howell County Kansas City Phelps County Reynolds County St. Francois County St. Louis City 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Montana Glacier Countyc Lake County Yellowstone Countya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / Nebraska Cedar County Douglas County Fillmore Countyc Seward Countya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / Nevada Clark County Lander County Washoe County 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Hampshire Hillsborough County Merrimack Countya 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / New Jersey Bergen County Essex County Hudson County Middlesex County Ocean County Salem County 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 New Mexico Bernalillo Countyb Lea Countya Rio Arriba County San Juan County Sierra County 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 3 0 0 25 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 1 0 / New York Erie County Holding Center Livingston County Nassau County New York Citya Onondaga County Oswego County Rensselaer County Steuben County North Carolina Alamance County Beaufort Countya Cumberland County Dare County Greene Countya Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 25 Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded North Carolina (continued) Harnett County Mecklenburg Countya New Hanover Countya Randolph Countya Wake County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 North Dakota Cass County Grand Forks County Mercer County 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ohio Ashland County Brown County Butler Countya Carroll County Clark County Franklin County Greene Countya Hamilton County Highland Heights City Mahoning County Muskingum County Richland County 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 Oklahoma Coal County Comanche Countyc Custer County Eufaula Citya Johnston County Le Flore County Oklahoma County Okmulgee County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 Oregon Deschutes Countya Josephine County Lane County Multnomah Countya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 1 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 1 / Pennsylvania Allegheny County Cumberland Countyc Dauphin County Greene County Lebanon County Luzerne County Montgomery County Philadelphia City Pike County Union County 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Carolina Beaufort County Charleston County Edgefield County Lexington County Pickens County Sumter-Lee County Regional 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Dakota Charles Mix Countya Minnehaha Countya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / / / / Tennessee De Kalb County Dickson County Fentress County Greene County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Tenneessee (continued Knox Countya Lincoln County Nashville-Davidson County Rhea County Scott County Shelby County Sullivan Countya 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 0 3 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 3 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / Texas Bell County Bexar County Brown Countya,c Burleson County Cameron County Comal County Crane Countya Dallas Countya El Paso County Falls County Fort Bend County Galveston County Grayson County Gregg County Hale Countya Harris County Hutchison Countya Johnson County Kemah City Lamar County Live Oak County Lubbock County Medina County Robertson County Tarrant Countya Travis County Zavala County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 Utah Carbon Countya Rich County Salt Lake County Washington County 0 0 15 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 / 0 1 2 / 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 Virginia Albemarle-Charlottesville Regional Augusta Countya Henrico County Loudon County Newport News Citya Norfolk City Pamunkey Regional Rappahannock Regional Richmond City Shenandoah County Virginia Peninsula Regional Warren County Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 27 Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Washington King County Pacific County Pierce Countya Spokane County Thurston County Whatcom County 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 West Virgina Kanawha County Regional Raleigh County Regionala 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / / / / / / / / / / / / Wisconsin Marathon Countya Milwaukee County Milwaukee County House of Cor.a Polk County Richland County Sawyer County Washington County Waukesha County Wyoming Albany Countyb,d Converse Countyb Natrona Countya Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). /Not reported. aReports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. bReports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded in a central database. c Reports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated allegations only. dReports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central database. 28 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Appendix table 3a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported in private prisons and jails, by type, 2005 Jurisdiction and facility Total Average daily population, 2005 Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubAllegastantiated stantiated Unfounded tions Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded 42,966 34 7 13 2 3 0 3 0 Arizona Arizona State Prison- Kingman (MTC)a Central Arizona Detention Center (CCA) 1,022 0 0 0 0 / / / / 3,259 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 California Central Valley Community Cor. (GEO)a Taft Correctional Institution (GEO) 532 0 0 0 0 / / / / 2,293 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 / / / / 920 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 850 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Colorado ComCor, Inc.a Crowley County Correctional Facility (CSC) Phoenix Center Connecticut Cochegan House (Connections) Florida Bay County Jail and Annex (CCA) Moore Haven Correctional Facility (GEO) South Bay Correctional Facility (GEO) 747 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,462 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Georgia Wheeler Correctional Facility (CCA) 1,500 13 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Indiana Volunteers of America of Indiana (VOA) 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kentucky Lee Adjustment Center (CORC) 770 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Louisiana Allen Correctional Center (GEO) 1,450 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Mississippi Delta Correctional Facility (CCA) East Mississippi Correctional Facility (GEO) 963 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 858 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 New Jersey Hope Hall (VOA) 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Mexico Guadalupe County Correctional Facilty (GEO)a 591 0 0 0 0 / / / / 1,428 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Ohio Lake Erie Correctional Institution (MTC)b,c Oklahoma Cimarron Correctional Facility (CCA) Diamondback Correctional Facility (CCA) 952 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,892 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pennsylvania George W. Hill Correctional Facility (GEO) 1,919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,950 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,077 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,630 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tennessee Hardeman County Correctional Center (CCA) Metro Davidson County Detention Facility (CCA) South Central Correctional Center (CORC) Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 29 Appendix table 3a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported in private prisons and jails, by type, 2005 Jurisdiction and facility Texas Big Spring Community Cor. Center (Cornell)a Bradshaw State Jail (CORC) Bridgeport Pre-Parole Facility (CCA)a Dawson State Jail (CCA) Houston/Reid Community Cor. Facility (Cornell) Limestone County Detention Center (CiviGenics) Lockhart Pre-Parole Facility (GEO) Mineral Wells Pre-Parole Facility (CCA) Willacy County State Jail (CCA) Virgina Lawrenceville Correctional Center (CCA) Average daily population, 2005 Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate onconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubstantistantiated ated Unfounded Allegations Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubstantiated stantiated Unfounded 2,792 1,973 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 196 2,166 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 444 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 762 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,030 1,053 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,568 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). Abbreviations or acronyms of private corporations: CCA - Corrections Corporation of America. CiviGenics - CiviGenics Corporation. Connections - The Connections Incorporated. CORC - Corrections Corporation. CSC - Correctional Services Corporation. Cornell - Cornell Companies, Incorporated. GEO - Global Expertise in Outsourcing. MTC - Management and Training Corporation. VOA - Volunteers of America. /Not reported. a Allegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts. bAllegations limited to substantiated occurrences only. c Allegations limited to completed acts only. 30 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Appendix table 3b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported in private prisons and jails, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Total Arizona Arizona State Prison-Kingman (MTC) Central Arizona Detention Center (CCA) California Central Valley Community Cor. (GEO)a Taft Correctional Institution (GEO) Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded 29 6 18 5 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 Colorado ComCor, Inc.b Crowley County Correctional Facility (CSC) Phoenix Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Connecticut Cochegan House (Connections) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Florida Bay County Jail and Annex (CCA) Moore Haven Correctional Facility (GEO) South Bay Correctional Facility (GEO) 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Georgia Wheeler Correctional Facility (CCA)c / / / / / / / / Indiana Volunteers of America of Indiana (VOA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kentucky Lee Adjustment Center (CORC) 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Louisiana Allen Correctional Center (GEO) 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mississippi Delta Correctional Facility (CCA) East Mississippi Correctional Facility (GEO)a 3 0 1 2 / / / / New Jersey Hope Hall (VOA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Mexico Guadalupe County Correctional Facilty (GEO) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ohio Lake Erie Correctional Institution (MTC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 10 1 / / / / 1 1 0 0 / / / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oklahoma Cimarron Correctional Facility (CCA) Diamondback Correctional Facility (CCA)a Pennsylvania George W. Hill Correctional Facility (GEO)a Tennessee Hardeman County Correctional Center (CCA) Metro Davidson County Detention Facility (CCA) South Central Correctional Center (CORC) Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 31 Appendix table 3b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported in private prisons and jails, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubSubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Texas Big Spring Community Cor. Center (Cornell)a Bradshaw State Jail (CORC) Bridgeport Pre-Parole Facility (CCA)a Dawson State Jail (CCA)a Houston/Reid Community Cor. Facility (Cornell) Limestone County Detention Center (CiviGenics)a Lockhart Pre-Parole Facility (GEO)c Mineral Wells Pre-Parole Facility (CCA) Willacy County State Jail (CCA) Virgina Lawrenceville Correctional Center (CCA) 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 / / / 0 / / / 0 / / / 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 1 / / 0 0 / / 0 1 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). Abbreviations or acronyms of private corporations: CCA - Corrections Corporation of America. CiviGenics - CiviGenics Corporation. Connections - The Connections Incorporated. CORC - Corrections Corporation. CSC - Correctional Services Corporation. Cornell - Cornell Companies, Incorporated. GEO - Global Expertise in Outsourcing. MTC - Management and Training Corporation. VOA - Volunteers of America. /Not reported. a Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. bReports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated allegations only. cReports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central database. 32 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 Appendix table 4a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported in other correctional facilities, by type, 2005 Jurisdiction and facility Total U.S. Military Air Force Army Marines Navy U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Aguadilla, PR* Aurora, CO Batavia, NY El Centro, CA Elizabeth, NJ El Paso, TX Florence, AZ* Houston, TX Laredo, TX Los Fresnos, TX Miami, FL* San Diego, CA San Pedro, CA* Tacoma, WA Jails in Indian Country Gila River Dept. of Cor. and Rehab., AZ Hopi Rehabilitation Center, AZ Red Lake Law Enforcement Services, MN Rosebud Sioux Tribe Law Enforcement, SD Supai Jail, AZ White Mountain Apache Police Dept., AZ Zuni Detention Facility, NM Average daily population, 2005 Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded 9,547 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 120 1,113 631 730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 15 454 480 350 624 343 820 260 600 580 1,119 393 496 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 152 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). /Not reported. *Allegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 33 Appendix table 4b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported in other correctional facilities, by type, 2005 Reported allegations of staff Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubSubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Total U.S. Military Air Force Army Marines Navy U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Aguadilla, PR* Aurora, CO Batavia, NY El Centro, CA Elizabeth, NJ El Paso, TX Florence, AZ Houston, TX Laredo, TX Los Fresnos, TX Miami, FL* San Diego, CA San Pedro, CA Tacoma, WA Jails in Indian Country Gila River Dept. of Cor. and Rehab., AZ Hopi Rehabilitation Center, AZ Red Lake Law Enforcement Services, MN Rosebud Sioux Tribe Law Enforcement, SD Supai Jail, AZ White Mountain Apache Police Deprt., AZ Zuni Detention Facility, NM 14 4 4 5 5 2 1 1 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). /Not reported. *Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. 34 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005