\.

2818 C.lpilOI Bt,d.
PO Bo\ .111')11
01> mpi.l. W.\ 'Hl:;U~·U·) 11

STATE OF WASHINGTON

13601 iBn.l0l81
fAX IJ60) ;5J·UlJ'J

PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD

Seplember 15, 1997

CERTIFIED P-360-112-992
P-360-112-993
John R. Anhur
Attorney at Law
10900 NE 8" SlrCCl Suite 850
Bellevue, WA 98004

RE:

Annette Belden v. Department of Corrections, Reduction in Salary Appeal &
Disabilitv Separation Appeal, Case Nos. RED-95-0060 & DSEP-96-0016

-

-

Dear Mr. Arthur:
Enclosed is a copy of the order of the Personnel Appeals Board in the above-referenced
matter. The order was entered by the Board on September 15, 1997.
Sincerely,

QUttLL~kL~
Kenneth J. Latsch
Executive Secretary

KJL:lh
Enclosure
cc:

Annene M. Belden
Michael Sellars, A.AG
Jennie Adkins, DOC

BEFORE THE PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD
STATE OF WASHINGTON

2
3

ANNETTE BELDEN,
4

s

Appellant,

~ Case No. RED-95-0060 and DSEP-96-0016

vs.

~

6
7

8
9

10

II

)
)

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

)
)
)
)

---------------)
These matters came before the Personnel Appeals Board, JUDITH MERCHANT, Chair; HOWARD
N. JORGENSON, Vice Chair; and ROGER F. SANFORD, Member, pursuant to WAC 358-30-084.

12

13

WAC 358-30-084 provides in relevant part:
14

IS
16

17
18

19

20
21

22

23
24

(l) In all appeals filed with the personnel appeals board:
(a) Where the parties have indicated that the case has been settled and ready
for dismissal and where there has been no action by the parties during the preceding
thirty days; or
(b) When. the board deems it appropriate for lack of timeliness or any other
jurisdictional matter where there is no question of fact; or
(c) When a party refuses to participate in a prehearing conference pursuant to
WAC 358-30-026(4); or
(d) When the board is unable to contact the appellant at the last address and
telephone number provided by the appellant, the executive secretary or hislher
designee may mail notice to the appellant or the appellant's representative and to the
respondent or the respondent's representative that the appeal will be dismissed by the
board unless within fifteen days following the date of service of the notice a written
request is made to the board and good cause is shown why the appeal should be
continued as a pending case.
(2) If no request is made, the matter will be brought before the board for
dismissal.

2S
26

Personnel Appeals Board
2828 Capitol Boulevard
Olympia, Washington 98504

The appeals of Annette Belden fall within the categories covered by the rule. Specifically, on July
2

16, 1997, the Personnel Appeals Board (PAB) was infonned that Ms. Belden had decided to drop

3

her appeals before the PAB. By letter dated July 22, 1997, the PAB contacted the Appellant's

4

Attorney and requested that the appeals be withdrawn. Subsequent to the July 22, 1997, letter from

5

PAB, there had been no action taken by either party to these appeals.

6
7

Therefore, on August 25, 1997, the PAB served the parties with a Notice of Potential Dismissal.

8

The notice stated that the appeals wO';1ld be dismissed, unless, within fifteen days following the date

9

of service, .the Board received a written request showing good cause why the appeals should be

10

continued as a pending case. Appellant received a copy of the notice by certified mail on August

11

26, 1997. Neither of the parties to this appeals have submitted a written request showing good

12

cause why the appeals should be continued as a pending case.

13
14

The Board having reviewed the files and records herein, being fully advised in the premises, now

IS

enters the following:

16

ORDER

17

NOW, THEREFORE, .IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeals of Annette Belden are

18

dismissed.

19

DATED this

20

Ih4b day of
-U..:..-

, 1997.
SHINGTON STATE PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD

21

22
23

24
25
26

Personnel Appeals Board
2828 Capitol Boulevard
Olympia, Washington 98504

2

BEFORE THE PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD
STATE OF WASHINGTON

2
3

ANNETTE BELDEN,
4

Appellant,

~ Case No. RED-95-0060 and DSEP-96-0016

vs.

~

5
6
7

8

)
)

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.

9

NOTICE OF POTENTIAL
) DISMISSAL

)
)
)
)
)

10
II

Pursuant to the provisions of WAC 358-30-084, notice is hereby given that the above-referenced

12

matters have been noted for dismissal by the Personnel Appeals Board.

13

14
15
16
17

18
19

20
21
22

23
24

WAC 358-30-084 provides in relevant part:
(1) In all appeals filed with the personnel appeals board:
(a) Where the parties have indicated that the case has been settled and ready
for dismissal and where there has been no action by the parties during the preceding
thirty days; or .
(b) When the board deems it appropriate for lack of timeliness or any other
jurisdictional matter where there is no question of fact; or
(c) When a party refuses to participate in a prehearlng conference pursuant to
WAC 358-30-026(4); or
(d) When the board is unable to contact the appellant at the last address and
telephone number provided by the appellant, the executive secretary or hislher
designee may mail notice to the appellant or the appellant's representative and to the
respondent or the respondent's representative that the appeal will be dismissed by the
board unless within fifteen days following the date of service of the notice a written
request is made to the board and good cause is shown why the appeal should be
continued as a pending case.
(2) If no request is made, the matter will be brought before the board for
dismissal.

25
26

Personnel Appeals Board
2828 Capitol Boulevard
Olympia, Washington 98504

It appears that the appeals of Annette Belden fall within the categories covered by the rule.
2

Specifically, on July 16, 1997, the Personnel Appeals Board (PAB) was informed that Ms. Belden

3

has decided to drop her appeals before the PAB. By letter dated July 22, 1997, the PAB contacted

4

the

5

1997, letter from PAB, there has been no action taken by either party to these appeals.

~ppellant's

Attorney and requested that the appeals be withdrawn.

Subsequent to the July 22,

6
7

Therefore, the appeals will be dismissed unless, within fifteen days following the date of service of

8

this notice, the Board receives a written request showing good cause why the appeals should be

9

continued as pending cases.

10
II

DATEDANDMAILEDthisiJ6 day of

f1~

,1997.

12

GTON STATE PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD
13
14
15
16

cc:
17
18

Annette Belden, APP
John R. Arthur;ATT
Michael Sellars, AAG
Jennie Adkins, DOC

19

\
20

\
21
22
23
24
25
26

Personnel Appeals Board
2828 Capitol Boulevard
Olympia, Washington 98504
2

2828 Capitol Blvd.
PO Box 40911
Olympia, WA 98504·0911

STATE OF WASHINGTON

PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD

(360) 586-1481
fAX (360) 753·0139

July 22, 1.997

John R. Arthur
Attorney at Law
10900 NE 8th Street, Suite 850
Bellevue, WA 98004
RE:

Annette Belden v. Department of Corrections
PAB Case Nos. RED-95-0060 and DSEP-96-0016

Dear Mr. Arthur:
On July 16, 1997, you informed a mediator for the Personnel Appeals Board that Ms. Belden had
decided to drop her appeals before the Board. However, the Board has not yet received a formal
withdrawal of the appeals.
Before we can close our files on Ms. Belden's appeals, we must receive a formal notification of
withdrawal. In order to assist you with submitting the withdrawal, I have enclosed a withdrawal
form. Please sign, date and return the form to us as soon as possible so that we can close our
files on the matters.
.
Sincerely,

~ 6...,5:)0<_"",-\
Holly Galloway
Senior Special Assistant to the Board
Enclosure
cc (without enclosure):
Michael P. Sellars, AAG
Jennie Adkins, DOC
Annette Belden, APP

o

~

..

.

.

"ot,\

"'.

.-' .......

WASHINGTON STATE

PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD

APPEAL STATUS REPORT
(To be completed by.Medlaton)

Date:

Appeal Name:
Appeal Number:

The status ofthe above-captioned appeal is as follows:

Cl

The appeal was settled and a copy of the withdrawal order is attached.

Cl

The appeal was settled and the parties are going to withdraw.

(J

Appellant called to advise that he/she would withdraw.

Cl

The appeal has been settled but final paperwork has not been c,?mpleted.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ should be contacted by
_ _ _ _ _--J. 19_ to be sure that the withdrawal is forthcoming.

[J

The appeal was' not settled in mediation. The case should now be set for
pre-hearing conference and hearing by the board.
The mediation case has not been scheduled, and the case is being
returned to the Board for re-assignment
Other

.
:t -l±

Date

~.

::r1\
"
. .>,

,

... .'

JOHN R. ARTHUR
ATTORNEY AT LAW
10900 N.E. 8TH STREET SUITE 850
BELLEVUE. WASHINGTON 98004
(206) 455·2022

16 July 1997
Jennifer Woods
Attorney at Law
715 North 193rd Place
Seattle, Washington 98133
Copy to:

(1)
(2)

Client
File

Dear Ms. Woods:
Annette Belden has decided to drop her appeals before
the Board and will pursue her discrimination claims with the
Washington State Human Rights Commission. This decision is
based upon the fact that the Commission can award
reimbursement of her attorney fees. I understand that Mr.
Sellers has requested a meeting. If he still wishes to meet
after being informed of this letter, he can contact me
directly. I would not object to your assistance at such a
meeting.
Sincerely,

/4I-1ctf&~

(J hn R. Arthur

RECEIVEr
JENNIFER WOODS
Attorney at Law
715 North 193rd Place
Seattle, WA 98133
(206) 546·9081

DEC 10 '990
~&

December 9, 1996

John R. Arthur
Attorney at Law
10900 N.E. 8th Street, #850
Bellevue, WA 98004
Re:

Michael P. Sellars
Assistant Attorney General
P.O. Box 40145
Olympia, WA 98504-0145

Belden v. Dept. of Corrections
PAS Case Ho. RED-95-0060

Dear Counsel:
This letter confirms the mediation date and time in the above
referenced appeal.
We will hold the mediation/pre-hearing
conference January 28, 1997 at 10:00 a.m. at the Washington State.
Reformatory. My understanding is that the Personnel Appeals Board
will be assigning me the disability separation appeal file for Ms.
Belden and that we will be mediating both the reduction in salary
and the disability separation appeal on January 28, 1997. I will
inform you both at once if I learn that I will not be assigned the
disability separation appeal.
By letter dated December 5, 1996, Mr. Arthur requested that he
appear by telepho~e for the mediation. I believe we will be able
to work something out to accommodate this request although I
believe face to face mediation of parties and representatives is
more effective. If Mr. Arthur can have Ms. Belden with him, then
they will be able to conference privately with one another and with
me. If Mr. Sellars can be with his client, then we may be able to
hook up on a conference call.
I am available to travel to the
institution if that works best.
Let me know how you see this
working and we will set it up for the convenience of you both.
Mr. Arthur sent me some documents pertaining to this mediation
which I am happy to review. If Mr. Sellars would like to provide
written background information, I will review it as well.
Very

e~

Jennifer
cc:

Kenneth Latsch

r

urs

WO~dS

,

(to- ..\

(;,1ou
J lett'"

/'f\L..
{::..V\ovJ .

4:c.J

STATE OF WASHINGTON

2828 Capitol Blvd.
PO Box 40911

Olympia, WA 98504.0911

PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD

(360) 586-1481
FAX (360) 753·0139

December 2, 1996

Annette M. Belden
12304 - 227th Avenue SE
Monroe, VVA 98272
RE:

Annette M. Belden v. Department of Corrections, Disability Separation Appeal,
Case No. DSEP-96-0016

Dear Ms. Belden:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of the above entitled appeal by the Personnel Appeals Board
on November 18, 1996.

For your information, we have enclosed a copy of the Personnel Appeals Board Laws &
Regulations and our brochure entitled "Your Right To Be Heard."

~~

~

e e

r.;J;J...

. atsch

Executive Secretary
KJL:lh
cc:

John R. Arthur, AIT
Linda Dalton, AAG
Jennie Adkins, PO

z:\lh\newappl/belden.doc

. .D 5L-P- '11JJ -OOIG:,
RECEIVED
NOV f 8 1996
November 12, 1996

~~~~

Director, Department of Personnel
600 South Franklin
Olympia, Washington 98504
Encl:

(1)
(2)
(3)

WAC 356-35-010
Medical Certification
Letter of Disability Separation

Copy to:

(1)
(2)
(3)

K. DuCharme
Dr. Nochlin
Dr. Reinking

Dear Sir:
I am requesting an appeal of my attached three page
Disability Separation, dated October 15, 1996, from the
Washington State Reformatory by Kenneth DuCharme,
Superintendent. My termination is in violation of the
attached WAC 356-35-010 Disability - Reasonable
Accommodation - Separation - Appeals. My termination
constitutes disability/handicap discrimination. I note the
following:
Article 1. An appointing authority may initiate a
disability separation of a permanent employee only
when reasonable accommodations cannot be provided.
According to both of my physicians, Dr. Eugenia
Nochlin and Dr. Richard Reinking, only minimal
accommodations are essential. My Employer has
refused to mutually agree upon an enumeration of
reasonable accommodations with my physicians for
over two years.
Article 2. My disability does not prevent my
performance of the essential functions of my
current job of RN3. Appropriate work is and was
available while accommodations were to be worked
out. I should have been given this work rather
than an inappropriate separation without pay.
Article 3. A disability determination and evidence was
provided by my physicians that I am able to
perform my duties with minimal accommodation.
Article 5. I view the disability separation as
disciplinary in keeping with management's
consistent treatment of me since April of 1993.

Page 1 of 2

Article 7. Both of my physicians have submitted
statements that I am able to perform both the
duties of my original position or other suitable
positions.
Dr. Nochlin's attached Medical Certification of 1 November
1996 establishes that I am currently able to work with, or
without, reasonable accommodations.
Respectfully submitted,

~~~
Annette M. Belden
12304-227th Avenue SE
Monroe, Washington 98272
(360) 794-4123

Page 2 of 2

: WAC 356-35--010 Disability-Reasonable accommodation-Separation-Appeals. (1) An appointing
authority may initiate a disability separation of a permanent employee only when reasonable accommodations
cannot be provided. When the employee requests a disability separation. the appointing authorit)' is DOL required
to consider reasonable accommodations.
(2) If the disability pre'\'ents perfonnance of an essential function of the CWTent job. and there is no
appropriate work av3ilable while ttying to reasonably accommodate the employee, the employee shall be allowed
to use accrued vacation, sick, shared leave, exchange, and/or c:ompens:1lOl')' time. Ifthcre is no paid leave
available or if the employee chooses not to use paid leave., the employee shall be placed on authorized leave
wilhout pay.
(3) When reasonable accommodations cannot be prodded, the employee may be separated by the appointing
authority after written notice of. whichever is greater,
(a) sixty calendar days; or.
(b) the number of consecutive work days for which only accrued sick and vacation leave. as defined in WAC
356·18-050 and 356-18-090, could be used.
Ifthe emplO}'cc is unable to work due to the disability during the notice period and there: u; no paid leaVe
available. the absence shaU be considered approved leave without pay.
The sixty eaIendar ~'s notice shall not be required when the emplo)'Cc requests and the appointing authority
approves a shorter notice period.
, (4) For purposes of this role, determinations of disability shall be made by an appointing authority only at tbe
employee's written request or after obtaining a written statement from a physician or a licensed mental health
professional. The appointing authority may require an employee to obtain a medical examination at agency
~se from a physician or a licensed mental health professional of tile agencYs choice. In such cases. the
ageIltj· shall pfO\;de the ph)/sician or licensed mental health professional '\\ith the specification for the employee's
class and a description of the employee's position. Evidence ma), be requested from the physician or licensed
mental health professional regarding tile employcc'S abilit)" to perfonn the specified duties.
(5) Agency initiated separations due to disability shall not be considered disciplinary actions and shall be
appealable to the personnel appeals board At the time of notification that their empJO)1Dent will be temlinated
because ofdisability, such employees shall be informed by the appointing authority oftheir right to appeal. The
appeal must be filed in writing to the personnel appeals board as provided in Title 358 WAC within thirty
calendar days after notice of separation is given.
(6) During the notice period required by subsection (3) of this section the agency shall inform employees
being separated due to disability that they may be eligible for benefits/assistance programs such as employees'
insurance plans. Social ~ty, worker's compensation, veteran's benefits, public assistanec. disabillly
retirement, and vocational rehabilitation.
(7) The names ,of pennanent cmplO)'ccs who have been separated because of disabili~' shall be placed on
reduction in force and promotional registers b)' the director of personnel as prmided in WAC 356-26-030 upon
submission ofa statement from a physician or licensed mental health professional that th~' are able to perfonn
the duties of the dass(es) for whieh the registers are established.
[Stamtory Authority: RCW 41.00.040 and 41.06.150. 93·14..()67 (Order 422), _ 356-35.010, tiled 6130/9'S.
effective 8/1193. Statutory Authority; RCW 41.06.150. 87-02-038 (Order 267), _ 356-35"()lO, filed Ifll87~
85·14-008 (Order 224), _ 356-35-010, filed 6/24185; 84-23-059 (Order 211), _ 356-35-010, filed 11120/84;
83.;24·002 (Order 193), _ 3S6-35..()IO, filed 11/28/83. Sramlory Authorit)r: RCW 41.06.150(17). 82-09-022
(Order 1(9), _ 356-35-010. filed 4/12182; 81-20.Q60 (Order 161). _ 356·3S.() 10. f1led 10/5/81; Order 58, _
356-35-010, filed 9110n3.1

TOTAL P.03

StaJa of WashinglOn

Medical Certification

EmpJoy:nent Securpy Depanment
I

(2) The palient~s under my care for1his con

-.3

'on: Ftcm:

To:

.3

patienrs ~dition:
;J
(4) If pregnant, what is the expected date of birth?
(3) Dale at onset:of the

(5) Did y~ advi~ the priMt to leave work because of illness, cli;abUity or pregnancy?
o Yea )(No
Yes lJ No
(6) Has !he palienl been unable to wot1< at any lIms? '1/
If Ves, pleas!, provide dates: From:
93
To:
Has the patie~t been released as able 10 reSl.lme wor1<?
ONo
If Yes.
F,ulllime
C Part rime
On what dale'?
~ ,j
(8) Please identifY any res1ricticns or limitations the patient may have as . tha days or hours of worl<, type of wort<, or place of wot1c. because of hislher

r

en

itt

health:
(9) . c:er1l~~lt,lat

/1/CfY"A-

:

'last. rp Tl'f)ated) (Q:Ex8ll'lin9dJ thi~ patient on:

'X

G:

.

/I-I-?~

11-1-9({,

s sgnature

' Date

o SECTION Two·
This person
unable to wori< becausa of a non·work related injury/Illness. Under RCW 50.06.020, benefits may be allowed
:
• to an otherwise eliSible individual who is reenlBring the work force after an absenee of not less than thirteen consecutive
wa$

calendarweeks resulling from temporary IOtal physical disabUity because ofa nonwork related injury or illness. In orderforus to detennine1his person's,
eligibilitY for benefits, we need the foRowing inlormalion from you.
( t) Diagnosis:
':
I

(3) Date bec:ame totally disabled for work:
(4) Dale r~ to l8SUtn8 full-time wock:

(5) I oer1ify thel the above individual was unable to work without &erious risk to hi$ or her h9alth during ttle period of tempanuy total c1isabllit{.

x
I Doc:tDr's

License ,

Signal\lre

Date

Please Return To:

Empk)yment security Department
3

P.O. Box 870
Everett, WA S8206

EMS e637 CR8\'.12193)

......

, ..
CHAS::

~IVE1.ANL>

Secret1ty

STATE OF WASHINGTON

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
WASHINGTON STATE REFOR/lliATORY
P.O. 80)( 777 • Monroe, Washington 98272-0777

October 15, 1996

CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Annette Belden
12304; 227th Avenue SE
Monro~, WA
98272
Dear

Mrs.

Belden:

This :is official notification of· your disability separation from
your f position as Registered Nurse 3 with the Washington. state
Refo~atory, effec~ive D~cember 14, 1996) pursuant to Merit System
·Rule356-34-010 O~sabil~ty - Separation - Appeal - Procedure.
On M~rch 14, 1996, you were assigned to home due to some troubling
incidents which had recently occurred. A copy of that letter is
attached. It more fully outlines the concerns I had at that time.
since ~hat time, I have attempted to receive a specific diagnosis
of :your health
condition
in
order
to
determine
your
ability/inability to perform your job duties.
On August 22,. 1996, Dr. Reinking, your psychologist, responded to
my inquiry regarding your condition.
H~ stated, in .part, "The
nature of Mrs. Belden's disability (i.e.,' P'I'SD) lIlajor depression,
etc.) is not like a tbad back' ..• there are no physical or mental
limitations that need to be imposed .. The nature of Mrs. Belden's
condition requires that tne interpersonal/supervisory environment
withln which she functions as a nurse be altered in ways I outlined
in my July 22, 1996 letter .•.. " Dr. Reinking further suggested a·
"face-to-face discussion be our next step". A copy of that letter
is attached.
On September IS, ~996, Deborah Addleman, Affirmative Action
Offxcer, and L: Nani McLaughlin, personnel supervisor, met with Dr.
Reinking. The meeting was held to discuss possible adjustments to
your RN 3 position. Or. Reinking had three solutions:
(1) reassign you to another RN 3 position in the
geographic location;

immed~ate

(2) appoint you to a position with equal·salary outside the
nursing profession;

october 15, 1996
Page Two
Department p~ovid~ t~aining for you and appoint you to
another profess~on w~thln the same pay range;

(3) the

Dr. Reinking said he would not agree to an accommo<;lation which
would!require you to lose salary and benefits or require a further
commute for you.
None :of the solutions that were offered by Dr.
available.

Reinking are

(1)

There are no vacant RN

(2)

There are no vacant positions with the Monroe Command.
that are at the same salary range (49N) and for which
you qualify;

(3)

An equivalent position within your salary range would
require a Bachelor's Degree. The Department has never
paid for someone to attain an undergraduate degree, nor
would this be considered a reasonable accommodation.

:3

position in the Monroe Command;

There~ore,

given the lack of options available and Dr. Reinkins's
statement that he would not agree to any other accommodation,
you are being separated from your position as a Registered Nurse 3.
This ~ction is being taken without prejUdice and may be rescinaed
at any time during the 60-calendar-clay period by submitting a
statement from your physician or mental health professional that
you are able to perform the.essential functions of your position
withOut restriction~
records indicate t.hat you have 76.9 hours accrued vacation
leave and 8 hours of sick leave.
r will allow you to use the
balance of your sick and vacation leave before December 13, 1996.
A supply of "Leave Request" forms is enclosed.
Our

Since you are a vested employee, you may be eliqible for non-duty
disability retirement. You are advised to contact the Department
of Rstirement systems, P.O. Box 48380, Olympia, Washington 98504A brochure from the Department of
8380 . or call 360-109-4700.
Retirement Systems describing disability benefits is en~losed. ,tt
is also suggest.ed that you contact the social SecurJ.ty Of~J.ce
regarding disability social security retirement. Another poss,ible
resource is Tom Gohm at the Department of p.erson~el who ,J.s a
disability personnel specialist. He can be reached ~n Olympla at
360-586-0164.

..

>4.t..1 ..

J.M.. .;. .' iZ:::z~"".:-<,"·,(,,:.r:;:m,·M#· .

... v:·, .. "Y.'·'
.~.".y:.,~.

.~

.

october 15, 1996
Page Three
The Merit system Rule on disability separation, a: copy is enclosed
P7o~ides that you ~ay a~p~al this term~nation due to disability by
fl.ll.ng a!1 appeal l.n wrl.tJ.ng to the Dl.rector of· Personnel, stat.e
Department of personnel, 600 South Franklin, olympia, Washington
98504, within 30 calendar days of this letter.
your letter must
state .that a disability does not exist. Additionally, you have the
right to have your name placed on the reduction-in-force register
and any current promotional registers by the Director, Department
of Personnel, provided you have sub~itted to the Director a current
physician's statement that you are physically able to perform the
duties of the class(es) for which the registers are established.
Your service with the state of washington since February 15, 1983
is appreciated. I regret that your condition has made a disability
separation necessary.
prior to receiving your final paycheck, please return any items of
state property such as picture IO, key chits, etc.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact
ei the:r mysel f or Cheryl Landers, Area Personnel Manager' (until L.
Nani McLaughlin returns from vacation on October 21, 1996). Cheryl
may be reached at 794-22BO at the Monroe Command House.
Sinc~relYI

!;l\
~
Krn~Charme

Superintendent

KDC:jh
:Enclosures
cc: Chase Riveland, secretary, Department of Corrections
Dennis Karras, Director, Department of Personnel
Jennie Adkins, Director, Division of HUDan Resources
Eldon Vail, Assistant Director, Division of prisons
Cheryl Landers, NW Area Personnel Manager
L. Nani McLaughlin, Personnel supervisor
EOHR File