:-~

-

U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Justice.Programs
National Institute of Justice ·

National
Directory of
Corrections
Construction

i

1993 Supplement

----M-----~---------

---

.

.: -:

__________ ......,,

l

About the National Institute
of Justice
The National Institute of Justice, a component of the Office of Justice Programs, is the research anq_ development agency
of the U.S. Department of Justice. NIJ was established to prevent and reduce crime and to improve the criminal justice
system. Specific mandates established by Congress in the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as
amended, and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 direct the National Institute of Justice to:
■

Sponsor special projects and research and development programs that will improve and strengthen the criminal
justice system and reduce or prevent crime.

■

Conduct national demonstration projects that employ innovative or promising approaches for improving criminal
justice.

■

Develop new technologies to fight crime and improve criminal justice.

■

Evaluate the effectiveness of criminal justice programs and identify programs that promise to be successful if
continued or repeated.

■

Recommend actions that can be taken by Federal, State, and local governments as well as private organizations to
improve criminal justice.

■

Carry out research on criminal behavior.

■

Develop new methods of crime prevention and reduction of crime and delinquency.

The National Institute of Justice has a long history of accomplishments, including the following:
■

Basic research on career criminals that led to the development of special police and prosecutor units to deal with
repeat offenders.

■

Research that confinned the link between drugs and crime.

■

The research and development program that resulted in the creation of police body armor that has meant the
difference between life and death to hundreds of police officers.

■

Pioneering scientific advances such as the research and development of DNA analysis to positively identify suspects
and eliminate the innocent from suspicion.

■

The evaluation of innovative justice programs to determine what works, including drug enforcement, community
policing, community anti-drug initiatives, prosecution of complex drug cases, drug testing throughout the criminal
justice system, and user accountability programs.

■

Creation of a corrections information-sharing system that enables State and local officials to exchange more efficient
and cost-effective concepts and techniques for planning, financing, and constructing new prisons and jails.

■

Operation of the world's largest criminal justice information clearinghouse, a resource used by State and local
officials across the Nation and by criminal justice agencies in foreign countries.

The Institute Director, who is appointed by the President ap_d confirmed by the Senate, establishes the Institute's
objectives, guided by the priorities of the Office of Justice Programs, the Department of Justice, and the needs of the
criminal justice field. The Institute actively solicits the views of criminal justice professionals to identify their most
critical problems. Dedicated to the priorities of Federal, State, and local criminal justice agencies, research and
development at the National Institute of Justice continues to search for answers to what works and why in the Nation's
war on drugs and crime.

. --j

U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs

National Institute ofJustice

National Directory of
Corrections Construction
1993 Supplement

July 1993

National Institute of Justice
Michael J. Russell
Acting Director

Data Gathering and Publication Support
Data GatheringNerification: Cheryll Bissell, Kathenne Furr (Meyers),
Brenda Harding, Mark La Rue, Sharon Williams
Editorial: Joan Alpert, Linda Odda, Judy Reardon,
Celeste Silevinac, Vivian Workman
Design: Richard Creighton, John Guzman
National Criminal Justice Reference Service

This 1993 Supplement of the National Directory ofCorrections
Construction was prepared by Aspen Systems Corporation
under contract number OJP-90--C-005. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author and do not
necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S.
Department of Justice.
·
The National Institute of Justice is a component of the Office of
Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice
Assistance, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Juvenile
Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims
of Crime.

Foreword
National Institute of Justice

The Nation's prisons and jails continue to face a crowding
crisis. A steady stream of offenders has more than doubled
Federal and State prison populations during the past 10
years, bringing the current total to a record 883,593,
according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Local jail
populations have surpassed 420,000, and the probation and
parole population now exceeds 3.2 million.
Prison and jail capacities are lacking in many localities,
compromising efforts to effectively punish offenders and
deter crime. Federal, State, and local authorities need
practical, proven information on more rapid and economical ways to meet the increasing demand for bed space.
That is why the National Institute of Justice (ND) created
the Construction Information Exchange (CIE)-an important resource that can help Federal, State, and local
jurisdictions make crucial investment decisions when
building or expanding corrections facilities. The Exchange
provides easy access to the latest concepts and techniques
for planning, financing, and constructing new prisons and
jails. Federal, State, and local officials can tap into this
valuable network and obtain the information they need
through the Construction Data Base, the Construction
Information Exchange Reference and Referral Service, the
National Directory of Corrections Construction, and
Construction Bulletins. Specific information on how CIE
works is included in this directory.
A key element of the Exchange is this National Directory
of Corrections Construction, based on results of a national
survey administered by the American Institute of Architects, Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture
Council (ACSA) on Architectural Research. The directory
is a catalog of up-to-date designs, construction and finance
methods, and costs for 148 of the prisons and jails completed and operational since 1985. Two previous editions
of the directory focused on similar information for prisons

and jails completed after 1978. For the first time, this
supplement features:
■

Data on complex-use facilities (secure areas of facilities
with law enforcement or courts components located within
the same complex).
■ Facilities that serve special inmate populations, such as
drug offenders and females.
■ Facilities using advanced technology systems, such as
closed-circuit television, perimeter detection/alarm, paging
or sound systems, and satellite or cable communication.

■ The costs of land acquisitions, equipment and furnishings purchases, and site development.
■

Location-specific information on the Nation's cities,
suburbs, and rural communities.

Corrections officials can turn to this compendium for a
wide range of options to help them make the most informed
decisions on corrections construction for today and in the
future.
The construction projects featured in this directory are
also available in the Construction Information Exchange
data base in greater detail. The data base includes all the
information-more than 400 types of data on each facility-obtained from architects and facility administrators.
This data base reflects continuous activities to collect and
maintain information on prison and jail projects as they are
completed and become operational.
With support from the Bureau of Justice Assistance and
cooperation from the American Institute of Architects,
ACSA Council on Architectural Research, NIJ's Construction Information Exchange can benefit Federal, State, and
local officials by providing innovative approaches that
incorporate techniques of proven effectiveness. By
building on the experience of others, officials can develop
well-designed, cost-effective prison and jail facilities that
will serve the needs of their jurisdictions.
Michael J. Russell
Acting Director

NJJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

iii

Acknowledgments

Many people provided support and assistance for this
publication. Special thanks go to the following:

National Institute of Justice
Paul Cascarano, Assistant Director
Carole Knapel, Visiting Fellow

Bureau of Justice Assistance
Jack A. Nadol, Acting Director

American Institute of Architects
Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture
Council on Architectural Research
Deane Evans, AJA, Director
Emily Cole

Federal Bureau of Prisons
Kathleen Hawk, Director
William J. Patrick, AIA, Deputy Assistant Director,
Administration Division
Mary Robinson, Design and Construction Branch
Mike Staggs, Facilities Management Branch

We are also indebted to all of the facility administrators,
government officials, and architects who contributed
information about their projects.

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Introduction

The National Institute of Justice developed the National
Directory of Corrections Construction to assist corrections
officials and others seeking to expand their facility capacities. The directory is one of four components of NIJ' s
Construction Information Exchange (CIE)-a resource that
promotes sharing information on building jails and prisons
in a timely and cost-effective manner.
This supplement of the National Directory of Corrections
· Construction features many of the prison and jail projects
completed since 1985. The three sections and three
appendixes, highlighted below, can assist officials in the
various phases of planning, designing, financing, and
constructing new and expanded corrections resources.

Section 1
The first section includes a glossary of terms used in the
facility profiles in section 3. The sequence of these terms
corresponds to their order of appearance in the profiles, and
each is coded to distinguish the source of data used: the
architect, facility administrator, or a mathematical calculation. In some instances, profile data fields may be listed as
"Unknown" or "N/A.'' "Unknown" indicates that information was not provided, and "N/A" indicates that the item
does not apply to the particular project. For example, the
profile does not show the total cost per inmate for a
complex-use project because the calculation would be
invalid; hence, the data field lists "N/A."
Also included in section 1 are cost indexes to assist in
comparing construction projects. These cost indexes
enable readers to make detailed cost comparisons between
different years and geographic regions. Years of comparison are available from 1978 through 1992. The 1978 base
allows for comparison of facilities featured in previous
editions of the National Directory of Corrections
Construction.

Section 2
The second section is composed of indexes that serve as
locators for particular projects based on location, inmate
design capacity by facility type, and category of construction. An alphabetical listing by facility name is also
provided. These indexes can assist readers in locating
projects that are comparable to their individual needs.
Additional information is provided in the appendixes.

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Section 3
The primary component of the directory, section 3 features
profiles of 148 prison and jail construction projects. These
profiles were prepared from data submitted and verified by
architects and facility administrators of projects completed
and operational since 1985. Profiles appear in a two-page
format, and in most instances, each is augmented with a
floor plan of the typical housing unit. The projects highlighted in this directory were accepted without evaluation
and include examples of both positive and negative
experiences. Facility profile pages are presented alphabetically by the State in which they are located and alphabetically by facility name.
Each facility profile provides 91 pieces of information;
additional information for each project, illustrated in
appendix B, is available in the data base.

Appendixes
Appendix A provides an alphabetical listing of architectural
firms and construction managers appearing in this directory. Appendix B shows a sample layout of the full range
of facility data available on the CIE data base. Finally,
appendix C lists additional sources and readings for corrections construction-related information. Publications
featured include those by the National Institute of Justice as
well as those available in the NIJ/NCJRS literature data
base.

Data Comparison
In identifying similar projects and facilities, caution must
be exercised when actually comparing and contrasting data.
Category of construction. Comparisons of different jails
or prisons may be inappropriate when the facilities to be
examined do not share common characteristics. For
example, a jail or prison categorized as a "new, ancillary
building" may not have complete support spaces such as
kitchen or administration. If such a building were compared with a "new, independent facility" offering complete
support services, the appearance of a reduced cost might be
misleading. For this reason, it is most appropriate to
compare facilities in the same construction category.

V

Costs. Cost comparisons can be especially difficult. To
facilitate comparison of construction costs alone, the total
cost excludes costs of land acquisition and architects' fees.
Moreover, several factors can influence the project costs
shown, and comparisons should be made with caution. For
example, readers will find that jails and prisons with
multiple occupancy cells are invariably less expensive (per
inmate) than facilities designed with single occupancy
cells. And highrise facilities are almost always more
expensive than lowrise buildings even when their capacities
are the same.
Dimensions. When comparing dimensions, readers should
examine "gross square feet per inmate." This is computed
by dividing the "gross square feet/corrections" by the
inmate design capacity. This statistic may show that some
buildings provide much more space per inmate than
otherwise comparable projects. However, it simply may be
that the policy of a particular jurisdiction requires that more
space be provided for vocational training, counseling, and
other support activities rather than larger cells. An example
of a common difference is where one facility has dayrooms
contiguous to cells and another facility has only corridors.
Housing areas. To facilitate comparisons of different
types of correctional facilities, each profile includes a
special series of housing statistics. For readers interested
primarily in those portions of a construction project that
relate to custody and housing of inmates, it is important to
note terms such as "Housing area," "Housing per inmate,"
"Housing area square feet," and "Size of cells." These
statistics allow comparisons that might otherwise be
impossible.

vi

The Construction Information
Exchange Program
In addition to the directory, the Exchange provides three
other information resources.
Construction data base. Features the full range of data
supplied by the architects and facility administrators for
each completed and operational prison and jail. Diskettes
and hardcopy printouts to meet individual needs are
available for analysis purposes.
Reference and referral. Assist in responding to questions
and concerns about jail and prison crowding, alternatives,
and construction issues. Information specialists are
available to provide information through searches of the
CIE data base, publications, and referrals.
Construction Bulletins. Report on selected projects and
topics that illustrate substantial time and cost savings in
constructing correctional facilities.
Once a decision has been made to build, officials must then
consider many critical questions that will determine what
shape, size, or cost the new or expanded facility will take.
Through the Construction Information Exchange and the
directory, corrections officials can build upon the experiences of others.
For further assistance, contact the Construction Information
Exchange: NU/NCJRS, Box 6000, Rockville, MD 20850;
800-851-3420.

Nll!Nationa!Directory of Corrections Construction

Contents

Foreword (NIJ) ................................................................ iii
Acknowledgments ........................................................... iv
Introduction ...................................................................... v
Contents .......................................................................... vii
Section 1
Glossary ........................................................................... 2
Construction Cost Indexes ............................................. 10
Section
Index:
Index:
Index:
Index:

2
State/county/city ................................................. 20
Inmate design capacity ....................................... 23
Category of construction .................................... 27
Facility name ...................................................... 31

Section 3
Facility Profiles
Arkansas
Varner Unit ............................................................... 36
California
Alameda City Police Department and Jail ................ 38
Alameda County Jail ................................................ .40
Butte County Minimum Security Facility ............... .42
ECI: Leo Chesney Women's Center ......................... 44
Federal Detention Center-Dublin ........................... 46
Lerdo Pre-Trial ...................... ,.................................. 48
Metropolitan Detention Center-Los Angeles ......... 50
Naval Consolidate Brig Miramar ........... ;.................. 52
Santa Clara County Main Jail ................................... 54
South County Detention Facility .............................. 56
Stanislaus County Public Safety Center ................... 58
West Valley Detention Center .................................. 60
Colorado
Alamosa County Detention Center ........................... 62
Arapahoe County Justice Center .............................. 64
Boulder County Jail .................................................. 66
Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center ................. 68
Huerfano County Law Enforcement Center ............. 70
Mesa County Detention Facility ............................... 72
Pueblo County Detention Facility-Work Release .. 74
Saguache County Jail ................................................ 76
Connecticut
Alexander Cybulski Correctional Institution ............ 78
Gamer Correctional Institution ................................. 80
Delaware
Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility ................... 82

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Florida
Brevard County Detention Center ............................ 84
Genesis Unit 200 Bed Correctional Facility ............. 86
Hillsborough County Orient Road Jail ..................... 88
James I. Montgomery Correctional Center ............... 90
John E. Goode Pre-Trial Detention Facility ............. 92
Martin Correctional Institution ................................. 94
Metro West Detention Center ................................... 96
Palm Beach County Stockade ................................... 98
Pinellas County Jail ................................................ l 00
Georgia
Central Correctional Institute ................................. 102
Central Probation Detention Center ........................ 104
Clayton County Correctional Institution ............ :... 106
Coastal Correctional Institution .............................. 108
Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center ........ 110
Georgia Women's Correctional Institute ................ 112
Glynn County Detention Center ............................. 114
Hays Correctional Institute-Bootcamp ................. 116
Henry County Jail ................................................... 118
Homerville Parole Center ............................ ,.......... 120
I.W. Davis Probation Detention Center .................. 122
Lowndes County Jail .............................................. 124
Northeast Probation Detention Center .................... 126
Northwest Probation Detention Center ................... 128
Phillips Correctional Institute-Bootcamp ............. 130
Rockdale-Dekalb Probation Detention Center ....... 132
Rogers Correctional Institute .................................. 134
Southeast Probation Detention Center .................... 136
Telfair Correctional Institute-Bootcamp .............. 138
Treutlen Shock Unit ................................................ 140
U.S. Federal Penitentiary-Atlanta ........................ 142
Ware Correctional Institute ..................................... 144
Washington Correctional Institute-Bootcamp ..... 146
Washington County Correctional Institution .......... 148
West Central Probation Detention Center .............. 150
Western Probation Detention Center ...................... 152
Women's Probation Detention Center .................... 154
Illinois
Danville Correctional Center .................................. 156
Hill Correctional Center ......................................... 158
Illinois River Correctional Center .......................... 160
McHenry County Government Center .................... 162
Robert H. Babcox Justice Center ............................ 164
Robinson Correctional Center ................................ 166
Taylorville Correctional Center ,............................. 168
Western Illinois Correctional Center ...................... 170
Will County Adult Detention Facility .................... 172

vii

Contents ccontinuect)

Indiana
Boone County Jail ................................................... 174
Gibson County Jail ................................................. 176
Kosciusko County Work Release ........................... 178
Tippecanoe County Law Enforcement Center ....... 180
Kansas
El Dorado Correctional Facility .............................. 182
Johnson County Jail ................................................ 184
Lansing Correctional Facility-East ...................... 186
Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility ........... 188
Sedgwick County Adult Local Detention Facility .. 190
Sedgwick County Work Release ............................ 192
Shawnee County Adult Detention Facility ............. 194
Stanton County Law Enforcement Center .............. 196
Wyandotte County Detention Center ...................... 198
Kentucky
Carroll County Regional Detention Center ............ 200
Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex ............... 202
Louisiana
Federal Correctional Institution-Oakdale I .......... 204
Federal Detention Center-Oakdale II ................... 206
Orleans Parish Prison .............................................. 208
St. Bernard Jail Complex ........................................ 210
Tulane Avenue Facility ........................................... 212
Maine
Androscoggin County Jail ...................................... 214
Maryland
Baltimore Pre-Release Unit for Women ................. 216
Central Laundry Facility ......................................... 218
Jessup Pre-Release Unit. ......................................... 220
Montgomery County Detention Center .................. 222
Montgomery County Detention Center .................. 224
Patuxent Institution ................................................. 226
Massachusetts
N01folk County Sheriff's Office and
Correctional Center ................................................. 228
Michigan
Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility .................... 230
Macomb County Jail ............................................... 232
Sergeant William Dickerson Detention Facility ..... 234
Minnesota
Hennepin County Adult Detention Center ............. 236
Minnesota Correctional Facility-Shakopee .......... 238
Sherburne County Jail ............................................. 240
Mississippi
Harrison County Jail ............................................... 242

viii

Missouri
Boone County Jail ................................................... 244
Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center ................ 246
Marion County Jail and Law Enforcement Center . 248
W estem Missouri Correctional Center ................... 250
Nevada
Ely State Prison ....................................................... 252
New Jersey
Cumberland County Jail ......................................... 254
Federal Correctional Institution-Fairton .............. 256
Monmouth County Correction Institution .............. 258
New York
Cattaraugus County Jail .......................................... 260
Genesee County Jail ............................................... 262
Metro Jefferson Public Safety Building ................. 264
Saratoga County Law Enforcement Center ............ 266
North Carolina
Duplin County Jail .................................................. 268
Durham County Jail Annex .................................... 270
Wake County Public Safety Center ........................ 272
Ohio
Grafton Correctional Institution ............................. 274
Lorain Correctional Institution ............................... 276
Northwest Ohio Regional Jail ................................. 278
Warren Correctional Institution .............................. 280
Oregon
Federal Correctional Institution-Sheridan ............ 282
Marion County Corrections Facility ....................... 284
Pennsylvania
Bucks County Rehabilitation Center ...................... 286
Federal Correctional Institution-McKean ............ 288
Federal Correctional Institution-Schuylkill ......... 290
Philadelphia Industrial Correctional Center ........... 292
State Correctional Institution at Waymart .............. 294
York County Prison ................................................ 296
Texas
Bee County Jail ....................................................... 298
Caldwell County Jail ............................................... 300
Federal Correctional Institution-Three Rivers ..... 302
Frio County Jail ...................................................... 304
Lew Sterrett Justice Center ..................................... 306
Nacogdoches County Jail Law Enforcement
Center .................................................................... 308
Rusk County Sheriff's Department ........................ 310
Utah
Oxbow Jail Facility ....... :......................................... 312

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Contents (continued)

Virginia
Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Regional
Adult Detention Center .......................................... 314
Greensville Correctional Center ............................. 316
Keen Mountain Correctional Center ....................... 318
Lorton Maximum Security Facility ........................ 320
Washington
Clallam Bay Correctional Center ............................ 322
Wisconsin
Columbia Correctional Institution .......................... 324
Milwaukee County Jail and Criminal
Justice Facility ....................................................... 326
Racine Correctional Institution ............................... 328
Wyoming
Sublette County Jail ................................................ 330
Appendix A
Reference: Architects and Construction Managers ..... 333
Appendix B
Data Base Profile Information ..................................... 341
Appendix C
Additional Resources ................................................... 347

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Section 1
Glossary
Construction Cost Indexes

Glossary

The terms explained in this glossary follow the order in
which they appear in the facility profiles.
Some of the responses in the facility profiles may include
the following:
N/A-not applicable.
Unknown-information not provided or unable to
determine.
None-as in the case of "inmate labor" and "prefabrication," none used.
To distinguish the sources of information, the following
codes are used in this glossary:
(A)-as reported by the architect.
(F)-as reported by the facility contact.
(C)-calculations.

Responsible official
The title and jurisdiction of the responsible elected official
under which the facility falls (for example, sheriff, mayor,
or commissioner). (F)

Contact
The name, title, and phone number of the responsible
official at the facility (for example, sheriff, jail administrator, or warden). This includes (where applicable) both the
actual location and mailing address. (F)

Architect
The name, address, and phone number of the primary
architectural firm(s) responsible for the project. This may
also include architectural consultants. (A)

Construction manager

these units of government typically house pretrial detainees. Jails may also house locally sentenced inmates
(typically sentenced to 1 year or less). Inmates may be held
on both felony and misdemeanor charges. Several States
permit inmates from State prison systems to be housed in
local jail facilities. Some States such as Pennsylvania refer
to their detention facilities as prisons. Other States (i.e.,
Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, and
Vermont) have integrated prison and jail systems. (F)
Prison: facility operated by any State, the District of
Columbia, or the Federal Government. Unlike local jails,
prisons house only sentenced offenders for periods typically longer than 1 year. Some States permit units of local
government to board jail inmates in State facilities, but this
practice is unusual. (F)
Private: facility operated by a private entity. Inmates are
sentenced to the Federal, State, or local correctional system
and can be housed in privately operated facilities. (F)

Jurisdiction type
The jurisdictional level of inmates confined to the facility.
Options include Federal, State, county, or city. (F)

Commitment type
The type of inmate housed in the facility, classified as
either pretrial or sentenced. (F)

Category
The category of construction for the specific project.
Several types of projects are included in this directory, and
each has different characteristics. (A)
Conversion: acquiring an existing facility such as a
warehouse and converting it into a correctional facility.

Facility type

Expansion project: extension or new wing added to an
existing facility. Data refer to the expansion only and do
not include existing or original building information
(except where noted).

Complex use: building with multiple purposes. In a local
facility, jail space may be combined with courts, law
enforcement, or other related uses. Cost comparisons are
discouraged for this type of facility because it may not be
possible to isolate corrections costs from the costs for other
areas of the building. (F)

New, anciIIary building: an entirely new building, but
relying on existing buildings for some or all support
services. The new facility does not provide a complete
array of "core" spaces. Data refer to the new addition
only and do not include existing or original building
information.

Jail: facility operated by any Federal, State, or local
(county/city/combination) government. Jails operated by

New, independent facility: an entirely new facility with
complete support services that does not rely on other
facilities.

If applicable, the name, address, and phone number of the
company hired to oversee the construction process. (A)

2

NJJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Phased project (future): when costs invested in construction relate to future expansion or addition in a master plan.
Phased project (past): completion of previously "master
planned" space(s) "shelled out" or partially constructed at
an earlier date.
Remodeling/renovation project: improvements within an
existing facility, typically to modernize an older jail or
prison and to bring the design into compliance with current
standards.
Temporary facility/housing: premanufactured or portable
units not intended for long-term use.

Building configuration
The physical arrangement of individual buildings. In a
complex-use facility, building configuration is provided for
the court or law enforcement building(s). (Figure 1) (A)

Campus style: a number of individual buildings that are
not interconnected.
Clusters: a number of interconnected individual buildings.
Courtyard: linear cell blocks interconnected around a
central enclosed courtyard.
Highrise: one building, more than four stories.
Integrated structure: one building.
Ladder, telephone pole: linear cell blocks arranged in
parallel off a central connecting corridor.
Wheel, spoke, or radial: linear cell blocks that emanate
from one central control area (like spokes from the hub of a
wheel).

Complex use
Lists other spaces within the project. These include, but are
not limited to, courts or law enforcement. Cost comparisons
are discouraged for this type of facility because it may not
be possible to isolate corrections costs from the costs for
other areas of the building. (A)

Facility location
Description of the project location-rural, suburb,
or urban. (F)

Amount of land
The total acreage acquired for the project. (F)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Time
Groundbreaking: the official date marking the beginning
of construction. (A)
Finish date: the date when the project is ready for occupation and operation. (F)
Construction time: the elapsed time, in months, from
groundbreaking to substantial completion of the
facility. (A)
Substantial completion: the stage in the progress of
construction when the work or designated portion thereof is
sufficiently complete in accordance with the contract
documents so the owner can occupy or utilize the facility
for its intended use. (F)

Costs
Total: the total cost of building and site improvements,
plus all approved change orders. However, this figure
does not include the cost of acquiring the site, the time of
public employees, or administrative expenses for the
project. Because it is intended to show the cost of construction, it does not include fees for architects and other
consultants. (F)
Building only: the cost for the facility only, excluding all
site work. Costs such as grading, paving, and providing
utilities are not included here. (F)
Final construction cost: indicates whether the final cost
for the project was higher or lower than, or the same as, the
construction cost prior to bid. (F)
Housing area: the cost for those areas of the correctional
facility designed for housing inmates. This includes the
total gross square footage of the entire housing building,
unit, or level, including the contiguous and associated
spaces for mechanical, circulation, storage, visiting,
control, counseling, multipurpose room, dayrooms,
exercise, interviews, and so forth. Excluded from this
figure are costs of independent or unrelated areas and
buildings such as intake, medical, special housing, administration, food service, vocational, educational, and
agricultural. (A)
Housing per inmate: the housing costs per general
population inmate. This figure is computed by dividing the
total number of general population inmates (design
capacity) into the housing area cost. (C)
Housing per cell: the housing cost per general population
cell. This figure is computed by dividing the total number
of general population cells into the housing area cost. (C)

3

Figure 1
Building configuration

Campus style

□□

□

Ladder, telephone pole

Wheel, spoke, or radial

Clusters

Courtyard

4

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Total per inmate: the total construction costs per inmate.
This figure is computed by dividing the total number of
inmates (design capacity) into total construction cost. This
cost is not calculated for complex-use facilities. (C)

tion (radio and telephone), inmate intercoms, paging and
sound systems, duress and fire alarms, door control and
monitoring systems, card access, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alarm, and satellite and cable. (A)

Total per GSF: the total construction costs per gross
square foot. This figure is computed by dividing the total
gross square feet into the total construction cost. (C)

Dimensions

Total per NSF: the total construction cost per net square
foot. This figure is computed by dividing the total net
square footage into the total construction cost. (C)
Total annual operating costs: the total current fiscal year
budget for the new facility, addition, or expansion. Cost
shown is related to the construction project. In the case of
an addition, this figure represents the operating cost for that
portion of the facility only. This figure only represents
corrections costs; it does not include costs that are affiliated
with a complex-use facility. This figure is computed by
adding staff, utilities, medical, food, transportation,
supplies and equipment, maintenance, communications,
and other operating costs. (F)

Construction type
Structural: the frame that carries the building's weight and
provides structural support for the facility. Examples of a
type of structural system include steel frame, load-bearing
precast panels, cast-in-place concrete frame, precast
concrete frame, precast concrete cells, and modular metal
cells. (A)
Exterior walls: the construction and materials that form
outside walls of the building, creating the security shell or
"envelope." Options include, but are not limited to,
materials such as precast panels, cast-in-place concrete,
CMU block, and brick. (A)
Interior walls: the construction materials that form inside
walls or partitions that divide cells and rooms within the
building. Options may include, but are not limited to,
materials such as precast panels, cast-in-place concrete,
CMU block, and brick. (A)
Exterior surface or facade: the exterior finish, resulting in
the completed outside appearance (sometimes called the
building's "skin"). Examples include, but are not limited to,
stucco, brick, natural wall, textured, colored concrete, and
CMU block. (A)
Electronic technology systems: the type, if applicable, of
electronic technology system(s) installed in the facility.
Options include lighting protection, video camera surveillance and closed-circuit television, staff intercommunica-

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Total GSF: the total square footage of the construction
project. If the project was an addition or expansion, this
figure represents the square footage of that addition or
expansion only. This figure is computed by adding the total
gross square footage for corrections, law enforcement,
courts, and other. Gross square feet is defined by the
American Institute of Architects as the sum of the areas of
the several floors of the building, including basements,
mezzanine, and intennediate floored tiers and penthouses
of headroom height, measured from the exterior faces of
exterior walls or from the center line of walls separating
buildings. Covered walkways, open roofs over paved areas,
porches, and similar spaces have the architectural area
multiplied by an area factor of 0.50. The architectural area
does not include such features as pipe trenches, exterior
terraces, steps, chimneys, and roof overhangs. (A)
Total NSF: the total net square footage of the construction
project. If the project was an addition or expansion, this
represents the net square footage of that addition or
expansion only. This figure is calculated by adding
corrections, law enforcement, courts, and other net square
footage. (A)
Corrections GSF: the gross square feet (as defined under
Total GSF above) of all spaces relating to corrections in the
construction project shown in the profile. In the case of an
addition or expansion, this figure represents the square
footage of that addition or expansion only. (A)
Corrections NSF: the net square footage of all spaces
relating to corrections in the construction project. In the
case of an addition or expansion, this figure represents the
square footage of that addition or expansion only. (A)
Housing area GSF: the size of spaces related directly to
the custody and housing of inmates, not the entire facility.
The figure includes total gross square footage of the
housing building, unit, or level, including the contiguous
and associated spaces for mechanical, circulation, storage,
visiting, control, staff areas, multipurpose rooms, dayrooms, exercise, interviews, and so forth. Excluded are
independent areas not contiguous to inmate housing such as
intake, medical, special housing, administration, food
service, vocational, educational, and other support activities

5

not directly associated with housing. In expansion or
addition construction projects, the square footage shown for
housing may be almost equal to the total square footage,
since support spaces may not be provided. (A)
Housing area NSF: the total net square footage of the
housing building, unit, or level. (A)
GSF per inmate (design): the gross square footage
assigned to an inmate based on design capacity. This figure
is computed by dividing the total number of inmates
(design capacity) into the total corrections gross square
footage. (C)
GSF per inmate (current): the gross square footage
assigned to an inmate based on the current population. This
figure is computed by dividing the current population into
the total corrections gross square footage. (C)
NSF per inmate (design): the net square footage assigned
to an inmate based on design capacity. This figure is
computed by dividing the total number of inmates (design
capacity) into the total corrections net square footage. (C)
NSF per inmate (current): the net square footage assigned
to an inmate based on the current population. This figure is
computed by dividing the current population into the total
corrections net square footage. (C)
Size of cells: space inside a typical cell. This figure is the
useful space and does not include areas consumed by a
plumbing chase or protruding walls. The type of cell
(single, double, dorm) is indicated. (A)
Net/gross square feet: this percentage is an expression of
building efficiency. Because spaces not used by staff or
inmates are excluded from net space, this percentage
represents how much of the total square footage is actually
devoted to everyday use purposes. The remaining space is
the amount consumed by spaces necessary for the building
but not used by its occupants. This percentage is calculated
by dividing the total gross square footage into the total net
square footage, multiplied by I 00. (C)

Inmate design capacity
General population: the number of inmates for general
population housing based on facility design. (A)
Special population: the number of inmates for special
housing based on facility design (i.e., holding, medical and
detoxification, psychiatric, isolation, protective custody,
work release). (A)

6

Total design (inmates): the total number of inmates
(general population and special housing) for whom the
project was designed. (A)
Current population: the total current population of the
project as reported by the facility official and the date of
the calculation. (A)

Inmate housing areas
Design: the options for layout or arrangement of the inmate
cells. Options include linear outside cells, where cells have
windows on outside walls, permitting direct light into cells;
linear inside cells, where cells are not on outside walls and
light to cells is indirect; and modular/pod, where cells are
arranged around a common dayroom with cell doors
opening into this activity area. (Figure 2) (A)
Cells per unit: the number of cells in each block, pod, or
module; the number of cells included in one housing unit of
the facility. If dorms only, one dorm equals one unit. (A)
Inmates per unit (design): the number of inmates (design
capacity) in a typical block, pod, module, or dorm. (A)
Inmates per unit (current): the number of inmates
currently housed in a typical block, pod, module, or dorm.
This number and the current population are given for the
same date. (F)
Management type (design): the type of surveillance used
for a typical housing unit per project design. Options
include intermittent surveillance, where officers may
periodically walk down hallways lined with cells and do
not have constant view of all inmate areas; remote surveillance, where officers have inmates under constant
observation but are separated from inmates by a security
enclosure or barrier; or direct supervision, where officers
are in constant contact with inmates and are not enclosed in
a workstation or separated by other barriers. (A)
Management type (current): the type of surveillance
currently used for a typical housing unit. Options include
intermittent surveillance, where officers may periodically
walk down hallways lined with cells and do not have
constant view of all inmate areas; remote surveillance,
where officers have inmates under constant observation but
are separated from inmates by a security enclosure or
barrier; or direct supervision, where officers are in constant
contact with inmates and are not enclosed in a workstation
or separated by other barriers. (F)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Figure 2

Design of inmate housing areas

Linear, cells are on outside walls

Hallway

Hallway

Linear, cells are inside

Hallway

~

/

Module/pod type, cells are on outside walls

Dayroom

~
NIJ!Nationa!Directory of Corrections Construction

7

Means to handle crowding: the means by which the
facility handles, or plans to handle, an inmate population
greater than the designed capacity. Options include, but are
not limited to, transfer to another facility, bunk beds in cell,
mattresses on floor, beds in dayroom, and second bunk
permanently attached to wall. (F)
Total officers per unit: the number of officers assigned to
an average housing unit by shift designations of day,
evening, and midnight. (F)

Construction process
Contract method: the legal and financial steps used in the
building process. Options include, but are not limited to,
conventional design-bid-build, turnkey design-build,
multiple bid packages, and fast track. (A)
Finance method: the method of payment and the source of
funds for the construction project. Options include State or
local general obligation bonds, lease-purchase, State or
local tax levy, fixed or variable financing rate, other
Federal funds, rent, private-sector funds, and shared cost
from multiple jurisdictions. (A)
Use of inmate labor: use of inmate labor in the construction of the new facility, addition, or expansion. If applicable, a brief explanation of the way in which inmate labor
was used and whether the percentage of inmate labor used
was extensive (greater than 50 percent), moderate (greater
than 25 percent but less than 50 percent), or limited (less
than 25 percent). (A)
Use of prefabrication: techniques that may have been used
to manufacture portions of the facility away from the
construction site. If applicable, the nature of the components is described and whether use of plant manufacturing
was extensive (greater than 50 percent), moderate (greater
than 25 percent but less than 50 percent), or limited (less
than 25 percent). (A)

Inmate cells
The finishes, fixtures, and furnishings selected for general
population cells. These aspects may be different for special
custody, isolation, medical, and other special population
areas of a jail or prison. (A)

Doors: the type, material, and locking mechanisms. Type
may be swinging or sliding. Material may be steel or wood.
Locking may be motor driven and remote locking, remote
locking only, or manual locking.

8

Floor surface: materials of the floor surface. Options
include, but are not limited to, materials such as linoleum,
carpet, epoxy coating, sealed concrete, and vinyl tile.
Intercom: the type of communications system between
officers and inmates. Options include, but are not limited
to, either one- or two-way systems to cells or common
areas, or no system.
HVAC: heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning. Describes the environmental systems included in the facility.
While all facilities have some form of heating, not every
jail or prison has an air conditioning system. Solar systems,
steam, gas, or other specialized energy recycling systems
are indicated here.
Plumbing: inmate plumbing fixtures, options include but
not are not limited to, stainless steel, china, or aluminum.
Indicates whether the lavatory and toilet are a combination
unit or separate units.
Furniture: chairs, beds, tables, and other furniture in cells
and dayrooms. Choices include, but are not limited to,
materials such as steel, wood, vinyl, plastic, and concrete.
Fire protection: fire protection systems used in inmate
housing areas. Hardware may include components such as
smoke detectors for cells, common areas, or both; sprinklers for cells, common areas, or both; or manual alarm
stations.
Windows: styles of windows. Choices include, but are not
limited to, slit windows, security screens, special security
windows, and standard windows and bars.

Security
Perimeter: the type(s) of perimeter security used in the
facility. Options include, but are not limited to, single,
double, or triple fence; razor wire on/between fence(s);
towers; video camera surveillance; building exterior only;
perimeter patrols; and perimeter detection and alarm
systems. (A)
Costs included: indicates that the costs for the perimeter
security are included in the total construction cost. (A)
Costs excluded: indicates that the costs for the perimeter
security are excluded from the total construction cost. (A)
Inmate security level: the percentage of inmate cells in
maximum, medium, minimum, and other security levels. (A)

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Maximum: most secure construction and the highest level
of staff supervision in the system. (A)
Medium: although not as restrictive as maximum, has a
locked unit and secure perimeter. (A)
Minimum: the least restrictive, allows the greatest movement for inmates. There may be dormitories; living areas
may not be locked; and perimeter security is limited or not
present. (A)
Other: a percentage and brief explanation, if applicable.
(A)
The Federal Bureau of Prisons identifies and ranks all
Federal facilities into five security levels: minimum, low,
maximum, high, and administrative.

Current staff

Current inmate/staff ratio: the number of inmates per
total staff based on the current population. This figure/ratio
is computed by dividing the current total number of staff
into the current population. Total staff includes administrative, security, maintenance and support, program, and
treatment staff. (C)
Contracted services: the contracting of facility services to
private vendors. Possibilities include, but are not limited to,
medical, food, and transportation services. (F)

Architect's reported analysis
Architects have reported positive and negative factors
which, in their opinion, strongly influenced both costs and
length of time that were required for completion of the
facility. (A)

Administration: includes wardens, superintendents,
directors, administrators, colonels, captains, majors, and
managerial and budget staff. Also includes support and
administrative staff, secretaries, typists, stenographers,
bookkeepers, clerks, and switchboard operators. (F)

Positive cost factors: factors that positively affected the
cost of the project. Options include, but are not limited to,
prefabricated and factory-assembled components; simple
construction methods, including repetitiveness of design,
phased construction; good competition and a favorable
market; and less expensive materials and hardware.

Security: the current number of full-time line staff and first
line supervisors, both sworn and unswom; correctional
officers; deputies; sergeants; lieutenants; and security
supervisors assigned to the new facility, addition, or
expansion. (F)

Negative cost factors: factors that negatively affected the
cost of the project. Options include, but are not limited to,
slow construction; high labor costs; difficult site conditions; government procedures and regulations; and complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical systems.

Programs and treatment: the current number of recreation, education, religious, vocational, industrial, classification, and other program personnel assigned to the new
facility, addition, or expansion. (F)

Positive time factors: factors that positively affected the
time schedule. Options include, but are not limited to, use
of prefabricated, factory-assembled components; simple
construction methods, including repetitiveness of design,
phased construction; advanced order of materials and
hardware; and coordination of design between the construction manager and the owner.

Maintenance: the current number of full-time engineers,
electricians, plumbers, janitors, repair people, groundskeepers, food service workers, commissaries, and other
maintenance/support personnel for the new facility,
expansion, or addition. (F)
Total: the total number of current full-time staff members
assigned to the new facility, addition, or expansion as
reported by the facility administration. This figure is
computed by adding current administration, security,
maintenance, program, and treatment staff. (F)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Negative time factors: factors that negatively affected the
time schedule. Options include, but are not limited to,
slow responses and delivery problems from vendors and
suppliers; labor problems; weather problems; government
procedures and regulations; and complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems.

9

Construction Cost Indexes

Facilities appearing in the NU National Directory of
Corrections Construction show the date and cost of
construction at a particular location, and you can
use the following table of Cost fudexes to estimate
what it would cost to construct that facility in your
geographic region. Likewise, you may have an NU
Construction Information Exchange Facility Data
Base Search printout that shows the date and cost of
construction for a jail or prison that you would like
to consider for your own jurisdiction. You can use
these indexes to make reasonably estimated comparisons. These comparisons should not be
substituted, however, for detailed budget estimates,
which include appropriate contingencies and
consider your specific site and program.

The formula:

The Cost Indexes are based on a 69-city national
average, with a 1978 base of 100. To estimate or
compare costs, use the index factors for the cities
closest to the geographic areas you wish to compare, or closest to the area in which you wish to
construct a new facility. The Cost fudexes are in
alphabetical order by State for your convenience.
The table does not list any cities in North Dakota.
The two main uses of the Cost Indexes involve the
estimation and comparison of costs for:
1. Construction in different regions for different
years (examples 1 and 2).
2. Construction in a particular region for different
years (example 3).

fudex factor for date and place desired
fudex factor for date and place known

X

known cost

=

estimated cost

Example 1
You are interested in adapting the Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center (DRDC), constructed in
1991 in Denver, Colorado, for construction in your
own region. The total construction cost for the
DRDC in 1991 was $36,000,000. Your new facility
is to be built in Charlotte, North Carolina.

(b) Multiply the DRDC known cost ($36,000,000)
by the result of (a).
(c) The result of (b) is the total estimated cost for
your new jail in Charlotte.

Procedure

1992 Charlotte index factor
1991 Denver index factor

=
=

140.3
159 .2

l 4 0. 3
159.2

=

$31,726,130

Calculation

(a) Divide the 1992 Charlotte index factor by the
199 I Denver index factor.

Example 1 formula:·
10

(1992 Charlotte index factor)
(1991 Denver index factor)

x

X

$36 000 000
'
'

DRDC known cost

estimated cost

= for Charlotte

NII/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Example 2
You are interested in adapting the Knox County
Jail, constructed in 1984 in Barbourville, Kentucky,
for construction in your own region. The total
construction cost for the Knox County Jail in 1984
was $666,000. Your new facility is to be built in
Billings, Montana.

Procedure
(a) Divide the 1992 Billings index factor by the
1984 Louisville (closest city to Barbourville,
Kentucky) index factor.

(1992 Billings index factor)

Example 2 formula:

(b) Multiply the Knox County Jail known cost

($666,000) by the result of (a).
(c) The result of (b) is the total projected cost for
your new jail in Billings.

Calculation
1992 Billings index factor
1984 Louisville index factor

=
=

162.4
130.4

l GZ.4
130.4

=

$829,436

X

$666 000
'

Knox County Jail

(1984 Louisville index factor) x known cost

estimated cost
= for Billings

Example 3
A replacement cost is needed for a State prison
located near Birmingham, Alabama. You would
like to model the new prison after the Federal
Correctional Institution constructed in 1979 in
Talladega, Alabama. The total construction cost for
that facility was $10,069,300.

(b) Multiply the Federal Correctional Institution
known construction cost ($10,069,300) by the result
of (a).
(c) The result of (b) is the total projected cost for the
replacement prison near Birmingham.

Calculation
Procedure
(a) Divide the 1992 Birmingham index factor by the
1979 Birmingham (closest city to Talladega) index
factor.

(1992 Birmingham index factor)

1992 Birmingham index factor = 144.9
1979 Birmingham index factor = 94.3
144·9 X $10 069 300
= $15,472,338
94.3
' '

Federal Correctional

estimated cost

Example 3 formula: (1979 Birmingham index factor) x Institution known cost = for Birmingham

NfJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

11

Alabama
Binningham

86.5

94.3

103.5

110.3

115.5

120.2

125.6

121.2

131.5

144.8

159.4

172.9

182.7

187.9

95.7

105.0

116.7

126.7

134.2

139.1

140.7

86.2

92.1

101.6

110.6

117.1

120.6

126.5

106.8
111.3
108.3
117.7

117.3
122.1
119.5
128.2

128.9
133.7
130.1
142.5

140.6
146.7
142.0
155.8

150.3
156.1
152.5
168.3

160.5
163.8
158.0
178.8

163.5
169.2
161.5
184.4

96.0

105.3

115.8

122.5

132.7

140.4

148.4

94.6

101.4

111.2

118.7

127.8

136.3

144.3

98.2

105.4

115.8

125.3

135.1

142.9

148.4

95.9

102.6

113.8

122.5

130.1

138.2

141.6

85.7
88.3
86.9

93.5
95.7
94.6

102.4
103.5
103.4

108.6
112.9
112.7

115.8
121.9
118.6

121.0
126.6
125.9

127.6
129.0
129.8

87.7

95.0

103.6

111.1

118.8

125.6

127.9

114.8

124.6

137.1

151.0

163.8

173.1

178.0

91.7

100.4

110.4

121.5

131.9

137.1

140.4

102.3
92.3

110.9
100.0

122.0
109.5

131.9
120.0

139.7
128.7

146.6
135.2

152.1
139.3

98.5

107.1

116.7

125.6

133.7

138.1

144.6

90.7

97.9

108.9

114.7

122.1

126.0

130.5

89.4

95.8

104.2

112.9

119.4

123.1

130.8

Alaska
Anchorage

Arizona
Phoenix

Arkansas
Little Rock

California
Fresno
Los Angeles
San Diego
San Francisco

Colorado
Denver

Connecticut
Hartford

Delaware
Wilmington

District of
Columbia
Florida
Jacksonville
Miami
Tampa

Georgia
Atlanta

Hawaii
Honolulu

Idaho
Boise

Illinois
Chicago
Peoria

Indiana
Indianapolis

Iowa
Des Moines

Kansas
Wichita

12

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

128.1

128.5

130.8

136.6

139.4

140.1

142.9

144.9

190.3

195.2

202.2

205.7

210.2

214.7

221.0

223.8

145.2

143.9

147.1

157.2

160.7

163.7

169.2

172.1

127.1

127.3

128.4

137.9

140.9

144.1

147.5

149.0

164.3
174.6
167.3
186.6

167.1
176.1
168.6
192.1

171.7
180.8
174.4
198.8

179.6
184.3
179.7
201.3

183.5
187.8
183.7
205.0

187.5
190.3
187.1
208.9

193.0
198.1
193.2
215.8

195.5
202.1
196.7
218.2

144.2

144.0

149.0

154.6

152.9

155.0

159.2

161.8

150.0

155.5

160.3

161.3

165.6

169.6

173.3

175.9

151.2

155.4

162.2

165.3

169.8

174.2

178.7

182.5

143.7

148.5

153.0

155.6

159.0

162.9

168.5

169.2

128.9
132.5
133.2

131.8
133.9
136.2

134.7
137.9
140.8

138.9
143.2
143.1

142.1
146.4
146.2

144.2
149.7
149.5

147.5
153.3
153.1

149.6
155.7
155.5

130.3

133.3

137.8

140.6

143.2

146.4

149.4

152.0

180.2

184.9

191.6

194.8

199.1

203.3

209.3

212.0

141.3

143.6

147.5

152.6

156.6

160.1

163.2

167.5

155.3
141.5

156.4
143.3

162.5
149.1

169.4
154.1

173.4
157.9

177.3
161.5

181.5
165.5

187.1
169.3

145.5

149.0

152.0

158.1

161.8

165.2

169.3

171.7

132.7

135.4

137.8

147.9

150.4

153.8

156.8

159.6

127.4

129.1

133.2

141.4

144.4

147.7

151.3

152.8

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

13

Kentucky
Louisville

91.0

99.0

106.9

114.4

120.4

123.3

130.4

89.2

96.6

106.4

113.8

121.6

127.8

134.2

86.1

92.5

101.0

110.6

120.9

127.6

131.8

95.5

102.5

112.5

122.9

129.2

136.6

141.3

107.7

114.1

125.0

132.4

145.9

154.5

163.7

105.5
86.0

114.8
93.2

125.5
101.7

136.2
111.8

145.8
120.6

150.6
125.6

155.7
129.2

98.3

107.6

117.6

124.7

134.7

140.3

149.3

80.1

88.7

98.8

105.5

111.0

115.9

120.2

98.0
97.2

105.9
106.2

115.4
117.0

124.2
124.0

133.6
131.2

138.6
137.4

145.2
144.9

93.8

101.4

110.7

118.8

128.1

135.5

142.2

90.2

99.8

107.4

114.6

123.0

128.3

132.9

102.0

112.1

124.2

137.0

143.6

151.6

155.0

87.0

93.4

102.0

111.7

122.2

128.9

133.2

104.7

112.2

122.9

131.6

141.7

149.6

159.5

93.9

101.5

113.8

123.3

132.7

137.0

142.9

103.6
117.7
100.7

111.5
124.5
108.3

121.9
136.3
118.1

132.6
147.8
129.6

141.8
160.2
141.6

151.3
170.4
147.7

156.4
180.5
153.1

79.4

86.8

93.5

101.9

106.9

113.7

116.9

Louisiana
New Orleans

Maine
Portland

Maryland
Baltimore

Massachusetts
Boston

Michigan
Detroit
Grand Rapids

Minnesota
Minneapolis

Mississippi
Jackson

Missouri
Kansas City
St. Louis

Montana
Billings

Nebraska
Omaha

Nevada
Las Vegas

New Hampshire
Nashua

New Jersey
Newark

New Mexico
Albuquerque

New York
Buffalo
New York
Rochester

North Carolina
Charlotte

14

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

131.4

132.9

136.9

146.8

149.2

152.7

155.6

158.4

136.1

136.3

139.2

143.3

142.8

145.2

147.6

150.1

133.6

136.5

141.5

145.8

149.7

153.2

156.8

159.2

143.1

147.7

153.2

153.0

155.8

159.7

166.5

165.6

169.3

176.2

183.2

186.1

191.4

196.1

199.3

202.6

157.0
130.3

160.1
132.9

165.8
137.9

172.1
142.3

177.1
146.2

180.9
149.5

185.3
153.2

189.1
155.9

149.0

153.5

157.9

160.7

164.2

167.8

171.7

174.6

122.3

122.3

123.8

131.6

134.6

136.6

139.7

141.7

145.0
149.1

147.4
153.3

152.6
158.5

156.5
164.0

159.4
165.3

162.9
169.0

166.4
171.0

167.4
174.6

137.8

142.3

145.7

151.7

152.8

155.8

159.9

162.4

130.2

133.4

137.8

145.8

149.2

152.6

156.4

158.8

156.5

157.5

162.3

171.3

175.0

178.8

184.0

186.4

134.9

137.9

143.0

147.3

151.2

154.8

158.4

160.8

167.5

173.8

180.7

180.1

185.5

191.2

196.8

200.8

142.6

143.6

145.5

151.5

153.5

157.3

159.4

163.7

159.8
188.8
155.4

167.6
196.1
162.4

172.8
206.1
167.3

173.4
207.7
169.1

176.9
215.0
172.5

178.9
223.4
174.5

184.5
230.4
179.9

186.5
236.7
181.8

119.1

121.0

126.6

129.1

131.9

135.0

138.1

140.3

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

15

II

I
I

Ohio
Cincinnati
Cleveland·
Columbus

98.5
103.8
97.0

107.8
113.5
106.7

117.6
124.7
116.4

125.5
134.3
127.2

133.7
144.8
136.2

138.0
149.9
141.9

145.1
157.2
145.9

88.5

96.5

105.7

116.9

125.7

129.4

132.3

99.8

110.5

120.2

132.1

140.6

145.3

148.0

95.3
104.1
101.1

103.0
111.2
109.4

112.8
123.4
120.4

123.5
130.2
129.8

131.6
139.5
135.8

138.5
148.1
142.9

143.6
155.8
150.1

96.4

103.6

113.0

123.9

135.4

142.9

147.6

78.0

84.3

91.6

101.3

110.0

116.2

118.1

79.7

86.6

94.5

102.7

111.2

116.4

121.5

87.1
84.8

93.9
93.6

105.5
102.3

111.2
110.2

118.4
116.5

123.8
120.0

128.8
125.0

87.8
81.7
91.7
84.9

95.9
90.1
101.5
93.6

106.7
98.7
110.4
102.4

115.3
107.1
122.4
112.2

123.8
115.2
129.5
120.2

130.3
120.3
136.4
124.6

136.2
123.4
141.1
127.8

94.1

101.4

111.1

117.8

125.5

132.4

140.9

84.7

90.9

99.2

108.8

118.9

125.5

129.6

87.1

93.6

102.1

112.4

117.6

125.1

127.5

101.4
99.6

112.9
109.8

124.5
119.9

135.8
131.9

146.8
139.7

151.4
146.2

155.0
150.4

98.3

106.2

116.3

127.4

135.8

142.9

148.2

99.9

108.2

117.3

128.3

135.5

140.7

146.0

87.6

95.5

104.7

113.7

123.3

130.0

134.9

Oklahoma
Oklahoma City

Oregon
Portland

Pennsylvania
Erie
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh

Rhode Island
Providence

South Carolina
Charleston

South Dakota
Sioux Falls

Tennessee
Memphis
Nashville

Texas
Dallas
El Paso
Houston
San Antonio

Utah
Salt Lake City

Vermont
Burlington

Virginia
Richmond

Washington
Seattle
Spokane

West Virginia
Charleston

Wisconsin
Milwaukee

Wyoming
Cheyenne

16

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

145.0
158.4
145.1

146.2
163.8
149.1

150.6
168.6
152.7

155.5
174.1
158.8

158.9
176.7
162.5

161.9
176.6
166.0

165.6
182.9
170.1

167.9
184.1
172.5

134.6

·132.3

132.9

142.0

143.9

147.5

149.4

153.5

149.1

150.9

153.5

163.2

167.5

171.2

174.6

179.1

146.2
160.1
154.1

149.0
165.6
157.1

153.6
173.1
160.4

156.3
175.9
162.0

159.3
181.1
164.3

163.8
186.1
169.5

167.4
190.8
172.6

169.8
196.1
175.0

149.6

152.8

158.5

163.3

167.6

171.6

175.6

178.2

119.1

121.3

126.3

129.4

132.4

135.5

138.8

140.9

122.0

125.0

129.3

132.0

135.1

138.2

141.7

143.9

130.9
127.3

132.9
127.7

135.4
130.1

144.1
137.6

146.6
140.8

149.9
142.8

152.8
146.1

155.5
148.2

135.6
122.8
138.3
128.1

133.0
121.9
136.5
128.2

134.8
126.3
136.4
130.3

134.8
131.6
147.9
137.0

138.4
133.4
149.9
138.8

142.1
136.7
153.6
142.2

142.1
138.5
155.6
144.1

147.8
142.3
159.9
148.0

136.3

140.9

143.6

150.3

151.5

154.4

158.5

161.0

131.3

134.2

139.1

143.4

147.l

150.6

154.2

156.5

129.6

133.6

136.5

140.7

143.7

147.3

152.3

153.0

155.5
152.3

157.7
154.6

160.2
158.2

166.7
164.4

171.2
168.7

174.8
172.5

176.8
175.9

183.8
180.4

150.8

153.7

158.4

161.2

164.3

168.9

172.7

175.2

147.7

150.4

156.0

163.1

167.1

170.9

175.2

179.1

134.1

135.0

139.9

144.6

145.8

148.6

152.6

154.9

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

17

Section 2
Index: State/county/city
Index: Inmate design capacity
Index: Category of construction
Index: Facility name

State/county/city

State Coooty/city
AR
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA

co
co
co
co
co
co
co
co
CT
CT
DE

FL
FL
FL
FL
FL

FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA

20

Grady
Alameda
Alameda County
Butte County
Dublin
Kem County
Live Oak
Los Angeles
San Bernardino County
San Diego
San Mateo County
Santa Oara County
Stanislaus County
Alamosa County
Arapahoe County
Boulder County
Denver
Huerfano County
Mesa County
Pueblo County
Saguache
Sandy Hook
Somers
Wilmington
Brevard County
Dade County
Duval County
Duval County
Hillsborough County
Indiantown
Orange County
Palm Beach County
Pinellas County
Atlanta
Blairsville
Buford
Butler
Cadwell
Cedartown
Claxton
Oaxton
Clayton County
Conyers
Davisboro
Davisboro
Garden City
Glynn County
Hardwick
Helena
Henry County

Index

Facility type
State prison
City complex
County jail
County jail
Federal detention/jail
County jail
State prison (privately operated)
Federal detention/jail
County jail
Regional jail (military)
County and city jail
County complex
County jail
County complex
County complex
County jail
State prison
County complex
County complex
County jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
County jail
County and city complex
County jail
State prison
County jail
County jail
County jail
Federal prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail

Facility name
Varner Unit
Alameda City Police Department and Jail
Alameda County Jail
Butte County Minimum Security Facility
Federal Detention Center-Dublin
Lerdo Pre-Trial
ECI: Leo Chesney Women's Center
Metropolitan Detention Center-Los Angeles
West Valley Detention Center
Naval Consolidated Brig Miramar
South County Detention Facility
Santa Clara County Main Jail
Stanislaus County Public Safety Center
Alamosa County Detention Center
Arapahoe County Justice Center
Boulder County Jail
Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center
Huerfano County Law Enforcement Center
Mesa County Detention Facility
Pueblo County Detention Facility-Work Release
Saguache County Jail
Garner Correctional Institution
Alexander Cybulski Correctional Institution
Multi-Putpose Criminal Justice Facility
Brevard County Detention Center
Metro West Detention Center
James I. Montgomery Correctional Center
John E. Goode Pre-Trial Detention Facility
Hillsborough County Orient Road Jail
Martin Correctional Institution
Genesis Unit 200 Bed Correctional Facility
Palm Beach County Stockade
Pinellas County Jail
U.S. Federal Penitentiary-Atlanta
Northeast Probation Detention Center
Phillips Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Western Probation Detention Center
Central Probation Detention Center
Northwest Probation Detention Center
Southeast Probation Detention Center
Women's Probation Detention Center
Clayton County Correctional Institution
Rockdale-Dekalb Probation Detention Center
Washington Correctional Institution--Boot Camp
Washington Correctional Institution
Coastal Correctional Institution
Glynn County Detention Center
Georgia Women's Correctional Institute
Telfair Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Henry County Jail

Page
36
38
40
42
46
48
44
50
60

52
56
54
58
62
64
66
68
70
72

74
76
80
78
82
84
96
90
92
88
94
86
98
100
142
126
130
152
104
128
136
154
106
132
146
148
108
114
112
138
118

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

State/county/city (continued)

Index

State County/city

Facility type

Facility name

GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
n,
n,
n,

State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
County complex
County complex
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
County jail
County jail
County complex
State prison
County jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
County complex
County complex
Regional jail
State prison
Federal prison
Federal detention/jail
County and city jail
County and city jail
County jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
County jail
State prison
County jail
County jail

Homerville Parole Center
Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
1 W. Davis Probation Detention Center
Lowndes County Jail
Central Correctional Institute
Rogers Correctional Institute
Treutlen Shock Unit
Hays Co~tional Institure-Boot Camp
Ware Correctional Institute
West Central Probation Detention Center
Illinois River Correctional Center
Danville Correctional Center
Hill Correctional Center
Robert H. Babcox Justice Center
McHenry County Government Center
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Robinson Correctional Center
Taylorville Correctional Center
Will County Adult Detention Facility
Boone County Jail
Gibson County Jail
Kosciusko County Work Release
Tippecanoe County Law Enforcement Center
El Dorado Correctional Facility
Johnson County Jail
Sedgwick County Adult Local Detention Facility
Lansing Correctional Facility-East
Lamed Correctional Mental Health Facility
Sedgwick County Work Release
Shawnee County Adult Detention Facility
Stanton County Law Enforcement Center
Wyandotte County Detention Center
Carroll County Regional Detention Center
Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Federal Correctional Institution-Oakdale I
Federal Detention Center-Oakdale Il
Orleans Parish Prison
Tulane Avenue Facility
St Bernard Jail Complex
Norfolk County Sheriffs Office and Correctional Center
Baltimore Pre-Release Unit for Women
Jessup Pre-Release Unit
Patuxentinstitution
Central Laundry Facility
Montgomery County Detention Center
Montgomery County Detention Center
Androscoggin County Jail
Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility
Macomb County Jail
Sergeant William Dickerson Detention Facility

IL
n,
Il.,

n,
n,
IL
IN
IN
IN
IN

KS
KS

KS
KS

KS
KS
KS
KS
KS

KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
MA

MD

MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
ME

MI
MI
MI

Homerville
Jackson
Jefferson
Lowndes County
Macon
Reidsville
Soperton
Trion
Waycross
'.Zebulon
Canton
Danville
Galesburg
Lake County
McHenry County
Mt Sterling
Robinson
Taylorville
Will County
Boone County
Gibson County
Kosciusko County
Tippecanoe County
El Dorado
Johnson County
Lake County
Lansing
Lamed
Sedgwick County
Shawnee County
Stanton County
Wyandotte County
Carroll County
West Liberty
Oakdale
Oakdale
Orleans Parish
Orleans Parish
St Bernard Parish
Norfolk County
Baltimore
Jessup
Jessup
Sykesville
Montgomery County
Montgomery County
Androscoggin County
Ionia
Macomb County
Wayne County

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Page
120

110
122
124
102
134
140

116
144
150
160

156
158
164

162
170
166

168
172

174
176
178
180
182
184
190
186
188
192
194
196
198
200
202
204
206
208
212
210
228
216
220
226
218
222
224
214

230
232
234

21

Index

State/county/city (continued)

State County/city

Facility type

Facility name

MN Hennepin County

County jail
State prison
County complex
County complex
State prison
State prison
County complex
County jail
County jail
County jail
County complex
Federal prison
County jail
County jail
State prison
County jail
County complex
County complex
County complex
State prison
State prison
State prison
Regional jail
County complex
Federal prison
Federal prison
County jail
Federal prison
City jail
State prison
County jail
County complex
County complex
County jail
County complex
County complex
County complex
Federal prison
County jail
Regional jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
County complex
State prison
State prison
County jail

Hennepin County Adult Detention Center
Minnesota Correctional Facility-Shakopee
Sherburne County Jail
Boone County Jail
Western Missouri Correctional Center
Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center
Marion County Jail and Law Enforcement Center
Harrison County Jail
Duplin County Jail
Durham County Jail Annex
Wake County Public Safety Center
Federal Correctional Institution-Fanton
Cumberland County Jail
Monmouth County Correction Institution
Ely State Prison
Cattaraugus County Jail
Genesee County Jail
Metro Jefferson Public Safety Building
Saratoga County Law Enforcement Center
Grafton Correctional Institution
Lorain Correctional Institution
Warren Correctional Institution
Northwest Ohio Regional Jail
Marion County Corrections Facility
Federal Correctional Institution-Sheridan
Federal Correctional Institution-McKean
Bucks County Rehabilitation Center
Federal Correctional Institution--Schuylkill
Philadelphia Industrial Correctional Center
State Correctional Institution at Waymart
York County Prison
Bee County Jail
Caldwell County Jail
Lew Sterrett Justice Center
Frio County Jail
Nacogdoches County Law Enforcement Center
Rusk County Sheriff's Department
Federal Correctional Institution-Three Rivers
Oxbow Jail Facility
Oarke-Frederick-Winchester Regional Adult Detention Center
Greensville Correctional Center
Lorton Maximum Security Facility
Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Clallam Bay Correctional Center
Milwaukee County Jail and Criminal Justice Facility
Columbia Correctional Institution
Racine Correctional Institution
Sublette County Jail

MN Shakopee
MN Sherburne County
MO Boone county
MO Cameron
MO Fulton
MO Marion County
MS Harrison County
NC Duplin County
NC Durham County
NC Wake County
NJ Cumberland
NJ Cumberland County
NJ Monmouth County
NV Ely
NY Cattaraugus County
NY Genesee County
NY Jefferson County
NY Saratoga County
OH Grafton
OH Grafton
OH Lebanon
OH William County
OR Marion County
OR Sheridan
PA Bradford
PA Bucks County
PA Minersville
PA Philadelphia
PA Waymart
PA York County
TX Bee County
TX Caldwell County
TX Dallas County
TX Frio County
TX Nacogdoches County
TX Rusk County
TX Three Rivers
UT Salt Lake County
VA Frederick County
VA Greensville
VA Lorton
VA Oakwood
WA OallamBay
WI Milwaukee County
WI Portage
WI Sturtevant
WY Sublette County

22

Page
236
238
240
244
250
246
248
242
268
270
272
256
254
258
252
260
262
264
266
274
276
280
278
284
282
288
286
290
292
294
296
298
300
306
304
308
310
302
312
314
316
320
318
322
326
324
328
330

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Inmate design capacity

Inmates
8
12

22
26
28
39
40
42
45
48
50
62
80
84
90
96
99
100
109

'

122
128
131
132
148
148
160
162
16.§.,
170
170
181
185
186
192
194
199
199
200
252
256
256
272
274
286
289
290
294
300
311
316

County/city facility name
Saguache County Jail
Stanton County Law Enforcement Center
Sublette County Jail
Alameda City Police Department and Jail
Pueblo County Detention Facility-Work Release
Huerfano County Law Enforcement Center
Duplin County Jail
Kosciusko County Work Release
Genesee County Jail
Alamosa County Detention Center
Sherburne County Jail
Gibson County Jail
Rusk County Sheriffs Department
Carroll County Regional Detention Center
Marion County Jail-and Law Enforcement Center
Butte County Minimum Security Facility
Sedgwick County Work Release
Ounberland County Jail
Hennepin County Adult Detention Center
Androscoggin County Jail
Bee County Jail
Montgomery County Detention Center
Cattaraugus County Jail
Caldwell County Jail
Nacogdoches County Law Enforcement Center
South County Detention Facility
Durham County Jail Annex
Saratoga County Law Enforcement Center
Frio County Jail
Henry County Jail
Metro Jefferson Public Safety Building
Tippecanoe County Law Enforcement Center
Boone County Jail
Mesa County Detention Facility
Boone County Jail
McHenry County Government Center
Shawnee County Adult Detention Facility
Genesis Unit 200 Bed Correctional Facility
Clayton County Correctional Institution
Monmouth County Correction Institution
Marion County Corrections Facility
Bucks County Rehabilitation Center
Johnson County Jail
Glynn County Detention Center
Palm Beach County Stockade
St Bernard Jail Complex
Stanislaus County Public Safety Center
Oarke-Frederick-Winchester Regional Adult
Boulder County Jail
Will County Adult Detention Facility

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Index

State

co
KS
WY

CA

co
co
NC

IN
NY

co

MN
IN
TX

KY
MO
CA
KS
NJ
MN
ME
TX

MD
NY
TX
TX

CA
NC
NY
TX

GA
NY
IN

MO

co
IN

IL
KS
FL
GA
NJ
OR
PA
KS
GA

FL
LA

CA
VA

co
IL

Page
76
196
330
38
74
70
268
178
262
62
240
176
310
200
248
42
192
254
236
214
298
222
260
300
308
56
270
266
304
118
264

180
244
72

174
162
194
86
106
258
284
286
184
114
98
210
58

314
66
172

23

Index

Inmate design capacity (continued)

Inmates

328
330
368
371
372
392
394
396
425
429
430
440

443
480
508
2
~
650
698
720
724
798
886
899
1,004

1,104
1,504
2,292
2,297
3,036
Inmates

74
106

120
128
150
154
154
154
154
154
154
154
154
154
200

200
200
200

24

County/city facility name

State

Page

Lowndes County Jail
Montgomery County Detention Center
Oxbow Jail Facility
Wyandotte County Detention Center
Tulane Avenue Facility
Brevard County Detention Center
Norfolk County Sheriffs Office and Correctional Center
Pinellas County Jail
Lew Sterrett Justice Center
Harrison County Jail
Sedgwick County Adult Local Detention Facility
James L Montgomery Correctional Center
Naval Consolidated Brig Miramar
Wake County Public Safety Center
Northwest Ohio Regional Jail
Orleans Parish Prison
York County Prison
Philadelphia Industrial Correctional Center
Robert H. Babcox Correctional Center
Santa Clara County Main Jail
Arapahoe County Justice Center
Milwaukee County Jail and Criminal Justice Facility
Sergeant William Dickerson Detention Facility
Macomb County Jail
Metro West Detention Center
Lerdo Pre-Trial
Hillsborough County Orient Road Jail
West Valley Detention Center
John E. Goode Pre-Trial Detention Facility
Alameda County Jail

GA
MD
UT

124
224
312
198
212

Ml
FL
CA
FL
CA
FL
CA

State facility name

State

Page

Baltimore Pre-Release Unit for Women
Minnesota Correctional Facility-Shakopee
ECT: Leo Chesney Women's Center
Patuxentlnstitution
Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Central Probation Detention Center
I.W. Davis Probation Detention Center
Northeast Probation Detention Center
Northwest Probation Detention Center
Rockdale-Dekalb Probation Detention Center
Southeast Probation Detention Center
West Central Probation Detention Center
Western Probation Detention Center
Women's Probation Detention Center
Central Correctional Institute
Coastal Correctional Institution
Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
Georgia Women's Correctional Institute

MD
MN
CA
MD

216
238

KS

LA
FL
MA

FL
TX
MS

KS
FL
CA
NC
OH
LA
PA
PA
IL
CA

co

WI
Ml

KS
GA
GA

GA
GA

GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA

GA
GA
GA

84

228
100
306
242
190
90

52
272
278
208
296
292
164
54
64
326
234
232
96
48
88
60

92
40

44

226
188
104
122
126
128
132
136
150
152
154
102
108

110
112

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Inmate design capacity (continued)

Inmates

200
200
200
200.
224
224
224
224
224
232
256
300
400

420
464

480
511
512
528
596
614
614
640

666

680
696
703
758
766
776
814
926
926
1,008
1,025
1,219
2,000
2,014
2,144
2,282

Index

State facility name

State

Rogers Correctional Institute
Ware Correctional Institute
Lansing Correctional Facility-E.ast
Lorton Maximum Security Facility
Hays Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Homerville Parole Center
Telfair Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Phillips Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Washington Correctional Institution-Boot Camp
Treutlen Shock Unit
Central Laundry Facility
Alexander Cybulski Correctional Institution
Clallam Bay Correctional Center
Jessup Pre-Release Unit
Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center
Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility
Columbia Correctional Institution
Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center
. Grafton Correctional Institution
Martin Correctional Institution
Robinson Correctional Center
Taylorville Correctional Center
El Dorado Correctional Facility
Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility
Washington Correctional Institution
Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Racine Correctional Institution
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Gamer Correctional Institution
Warren Correctional Institution
Illinois River Correctional Center
Danville Correctional Center
Hill Correctional Center
Ely State Prison
State Correctional Institution Waymart
Varner Unit
Western Missouri Correctional Center
Lorain Correctional Institution
E.astern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Greensville Correctional Center

at

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

GA
GA
KS
VA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
MD
CT

WA
MD

co
DE
Wl

MO
OH
FL

IL
IL
KS
Ml

GA
VA
Wl
IL
CT

OH
IL
IL
IL
NV
PA
AR

MO
OH
KY
VA

Page

134
144
186
320
116
120
138
130
146
140
218
78
322
220
68
82
324
246
274
94
166
168
182
230
148
318
328
170
80
280
160
156
158
252
294
36
250
276
202
316

25

Inmate design capacity (continued)

Inmates
236

426
588
699
725
l,OCO
1,040
1,066
1,088
.1,316

26

Index

Federalfacility name

State

Federal Detention Center-Dublin
U.S. Federal Penitentiary-Atlanta
.Metropolitan Detention Center-Los Angeles
Federal Detention Center-Oakdale II
Federal Conectional Institution-Oakdale I
Federal Correctional Institution-Fairtori .
Federal Conectional Institution-McKean
Federal Conectional Institution-Three Rivers
Federal Conectional Institution-Schuylldll
Federal Conectional Institution-Sheridan

CA
GA
CA
LA
LA
NJ
PA
TX
PA
OR

Page
46

142
50
206

204
256
288
302

290
282

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Category of construction

Category

New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction

Index

State

Facility name

Facility type

AR

Varner Unit
Alameda County Jail
Metropolitan Detention Center-Los Angeles
Naval Consolidated Brig Miramar
Santa Clara County Main Jail
Stanislaus County Public Safety Center
West Valley Detention Center
Alamosa County Detention Center
Arapahoe County Justice Center
Boulder County Jail
Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center
Huerfano County Law Enforcement Center
Alexander Cybulski Correctional Institution
Gamer Correctional Institution
Brevard County Detention Center
Hillsborough County Orient Road Jail
James I. Montgomery Correctional Center
John E. Goode Pre-Trial Detention Facility
Martin Correctional Institution
Central Probation Detention Center
Clayton County Correctional Institution
Glynn County Detention Center
Henry County Jail
I.W. Davis Probation Detention Center
Northeast Probation Detention Center
Northwest Probation Detention Center
Rockdale-Dekalb Probation Detention Center
Southeast Probation Detention Center
Treutlen Shock Unit
West Central Probation Detention Center
Westem Probation Detention Center
Women's Probation Detention Center
Danville Correctional Center
Hill Correctional Center
Illinois River Correctional Center
McHenry County Government Center
Robert H. Babcox Justice Center
Robinson Correctional Center
Taylorville Correctional Center
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Will County Adult Detention Facility
Boone County Jail
Tippecanoe County Law Enforcement Center
El Dorado Correctional Facility
Johnson County Jail
Lamed Correctional Mental Health Facility
Sedgwick County Adult Local Detention Facility
Shawnee County Adult Detention Facility
Wyandotte County Detention Center
Carroll County Regional Detention Center

State prison
County jail
Federal detention/jail
Regional jail (military)
County complex
County jail
County jail
County complex
County complex
County jail
State prison
County complex
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
County jail
County and city complex
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
County complex
County complex
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
County complex
State prison
County jail
State prison
County jail
County jail
County complex
Regional jail

CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA

co
co
co
co
co
CT
CT

FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL

IN
IN
KS

KS
KS

KS
KS
KS
KY

NIJ/National Directory ofCorrections Construction

Page

36
40

50
52
54
58
(i()

62
64
66
68
70

78
80
84
88
90
92

94
lOt
106

114
118
122
126
128

132
136
140
150
152
154

156
158
100
162
164
166

168
170
172
174
180

182
184

188
190
194

198
200

.27

Index

Category of construction (continued)

Category

State

Facility name

Facility type

New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction

KY
LA
LA

Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Federal Correctional Institution-Oakdale I
Federal Detention Center-Oakdale II
St Bernard Jail Complex
Norlolk County Sheriffs Office and Correctional Center
Baltimore Pre-Release Unit for Women
Jessup Pre-Release Unit
Androscoggin County Jail
Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility
Sergeant William Dickerson Detention Facility
Minnesota Correctional Facility-Shakopee
Boone County Jail
Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center
Marion County Jail and Law Enforcement Center
Western Missouri Correctional Center
Harrison County Jail
Wake County Public Safety Center
Federal Correctional Institution-Fairton
Ely State Prison
Metro Jefferson Public Safety Building
Grafton Correctional Institution
Lorain Correctional Institution
Northwest Ohio Regional Jail
Warren Correctional Institution
Federal Correctional Institution-Sheridan
Marion County Corrections Facility
Bucks County Rehabilitation Center
Federal Correctional Institution-McKean
Federal Correctional Institution-Schuylkill
Philadelphia Industrial Correctional Center
Bee County Jail
Caldwell County Jail
Federal Correctional Institution-Three Rivers
Frio County Jail
Nacogdoches County Law Enforcement Center
Rusk County Sheriffs Department
Oxbow Jail Facility
Clark-Frederick-Winchester Regional
Adult Detention Center
Greensville Correctional Center
Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Columbia Correctional Institution
Racine Correctional Institution
Butte County Minimum Security Facility
ECI: Leo Chesney Women's Center
Federal Detention Center-Dublin
South County Detention Facility
Mesa County Detention Facility
Genesis Unit 200 Bed Correctional Facility
Metro West Detention Center

State prison
Federal prison
Federal detention/jail
County jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
County jail
State prison
County complex
State prison
County complex
State prison
County complex
County complex
Federal prison
State prison
County complex
State prison
State prison
Regional jail
State prison
Federal prison
County complex
County jail
Federal prison
Federal prison
City jail
County complex
County complex
Federal prison
County complex
County complex
County complex
County jail

New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New Construction
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building

28

LA
MA

MD
MD
ME
MI
MI
MN

MO
MO
MO
MO
MS
NC
NJ
NV

NY

OH
OH
OH

OH
OR

OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UT
VA
VA
VA
WI
WI
CA
CA
CA
CA

co
FL

FL

Page
202
204
206
210
228
216
220
214
230
234
238
244
246
248
250
242
272
256
252
264
274
276
278
280
282
284
286
288
290
292
298
300
302
304
308
310
312

Regional jail
314
State prison
316
State prison
318
324
State prison
State prison
328
County jail
42
State prison (privately operated) 44
Federal detention/jail
46
County and city jail
56
County complex
72
County jail
86
County jail
96

NJJ/National Direc,tory of Corrections Construction

Category of construction (continued)

Index

Category

State

Facility name

Facility type

New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
New, ancillary building
RemodeVrenovation
RemodeVrenovation
Remodel/renovation
RemodeVrenovation
RemodeVrenovation
Remodel/renovation
Remodel/renovation
Remodel/renovation
Remodel/renovation
Remodel/renovation
Remodel/renovation
Remodel/renovation
Remodel/renovation
Remodel/renovation
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion

FL

Palm Beach CoWlty Stockade
Central Correctional Institute
Coastal Correctional Institution
Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
Georgia Women's Correctional Institute
Hays Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Homerville Parole Center
Phillips Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Rogers Correctional Institute
Telfair Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Ware Correctional Institute
Washington Correctional Institution-Boot Camp
Washington Correctional Institution
Gibson CoW1ty Jail
Lansing Correctional Facility-East
Orleans Parish Prison
Tulane Avenue Facility
Central Laundry Facility
Montgomery County Detention Center
Patuxent Institution
Duplin County Jail
York County Prison
Lorton Maximwn Security Facility
Clallam Bay Correctional Center
l'vlilwaukee County Jail and Criminal Justice Facility
Lerdo Pre-Trial
Saguache County Jail
Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility
U.S. Federal Penitentiary-Atlanta
Gibson County Jail
Kosciusko County Work Release
Sedgwick County Work Release
Stanton County Law Enforcement Center
Macomb County Jail
Monmouth County Correction Institution
State Correctional Institution at Waymart
Yorlc County Prison
Lew Sterrett Justice Center
Racine Correctional Institution
Varner Unit
Alameda City Police Department and Jail
ECI: Leo Chesney Women's Center
Pueblo CoWlty Detention Facility-Work Release
Saguache County Jail
Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility
Pinellas County Jail
Lowndes County Jail
Stanton County Law Enforcement Center
Montgomery County Detention Center
Macomb County Jail

CoWltyjail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison·
County and city jail
County and city jail
State prison
County jail
State prison
County jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
County complex
County jail
County jail
State prison
Federal prison
County jail
County jail
County jail
County complex
County jail
CoW1tyjail
State prison
County jail
CoWltyjail
State prison
State prison
City complex
State prison (privately operated)
County jail
County jail
State prison
County jail
County jail
County complex
County jail
County jail

GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA

GA
GA
GA

GA
GA

GA
IN

KS
LA
LA
IvID
IvID
IvID

NC
PA
VA
WA
WI

CA

co
DE

GA
IN
IN
KS

KS
MI

NJ
PA
PA
TX
WI
AR

CA
CA

co
co

DE
FL
GA

KS
IvID

MI

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Page

98
102
108
110
112
116

120
130
134
138
144
146

148
176

186
208
212
218
222
226
268
296
320
322
326
48
76
82
142
176
178
192
196
232
258
294
296
306
328

36
38
44

74
76
82
100
124
196

224
232

29

Category of construction (continued)

Index

Category

State

Facility name

Facility type

Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Expansion
Phased project (past)
Phased project (past)
Phased project (future)
Phased project (future)
Conversion
Conversion
Conversion
Conversion
Unknown

MN
NJ
NY
NY
PA

Sherburne County Jail
Cumberland County Jail
Cattaraugus County Jail
Genesee County Jail
York County Prison
Sublette County Jail
Robert H. Babcox Justice Center
Hennepin County Adult Detention Center
West Valley Detention Center
Lorain Correctional Institution
Robert H. Babcox Justice Center
Tulane Avenue Facility
Durham County Jail Annex
State Correctional Institution at Waymart
Saratoga County Law Enfmcement Center

County complex
County jail
County jail
County complex
County jail
County jail
County complex
CoWltyjail
County jail
State prison
County complex
County and city jail
County jail
State prison
Coooty complex

30

WY
IL
MN
CA
OH
IL

LA
NC
PA
NY

Page
240

254
260
262
296
330
164

236
60
276
164

212
270
294
266

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Facility name

Index

Facility name

State

Facility type

Alameda City Police Department and Jail
Alameda County Jail
Alamosa County Detention Center
Alexander Cybulski Correctional Institution
Androscoggin County Jail
Arapahoe County Justice Center
Baltimore Pre-Release Unit for Women
Bee County Jail
Boone County Jail
Boone County Jail
Boulder County Jail
Brevard County Detention Center
Bucks County Rehabilitation Center
Butte County Minimum Security Facility
Caldwell County Jail
Carroll County Regional Detention Center
Cattaraugus County Jail
Central Correctional Institute
Central Laundry Facility
Central Probation Detention Center
Clallam Bay Correctional Center
Oarke-Frederick-Winchester Regional Adult Detention Center
Clayton County Correctional Institution
Coastal Correctional Institution
Columbia Correctional Institution
Cumberland County Jail
Danville Correctional Center
Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center
Duplin County Jail
Durham County Jail Annex
ECI; Leo Chesney Women's Center
Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
El Dorado Correctional Facility
Ely State Prison
Federal Correctional lnstitution-Fairton
Federal Correctional Institution-McKean
Federal Correctional Institution-Oakdale I
Federal Correctional Institution-Schuylkill
Federal Correctional Institution-Sheridan
Federal Correctional Institution---Three Rivers
Federal Detention Center-Oakdale II
Federal Detention Center-Dublin
Frio County Jail
Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center
Garner Correctional Institution
Genesee County Jail
Genesis Unit 200 Bed Correctional Facility
Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
Georgia Women's Correctional Institute
Gibson County Jail

CA
CA

City complex
County jail
County complex
State prison
County jail
County complex
State prison
County complex
County jail
County complex
County jail
County jail
County jail
County jail
County complex
Regional jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
Regional jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
State prison (privately operated)
State prison
State prison
State prison
Federal prison
Federal prison
Federal prison
Federal prison
Federal prison
Federal prison
Federal detention/jail
Federal detention/jail
County complex
State prison
State prison
County complex
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

co
CT
:ME

co

MD

TX
IN

MO

co
FL
PA
CA

TX
KY
NY
GA
MD
GA
WA
VA
GA
GA
WI
NJ
IL

co
NC
NC
CA
KY
KS
NV
NJ
PA
LA
PA
OR
TX
LA
CA
TX
MO
CT
NY
FL
GA
GA
IN

Page
38
40
62
78
214

64
216
298
174
244
66
84
286
42
300
200
260
102
218
104
322
314
106
108
324
254
156
68
268
270
44
202
182
252
256
288
204
290
282
302

206
46
304

246
80
262
86
110

112
176

31

Index

Facility name (continued)

Facility name

State

Facility type

Glynn County Detention Center
Grafton Correctional Institution
Greensville Correctional Center
Harrison County Jail
Hays Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Hennepin County Adult Detention Center
Herny County Jail
Hill Correctional Center
Hillsborough County Orient Road Jail
Homerville Parole Center
Huerfano County Law Enforcement Center
I.W. Davis Probation Detention Center
Illinois River Correctional Center
Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility
James I. Montgomery Correctional Center
Jessup Pre-Release Unit
John E. Goode Pre-Trial Detention Facility
Johnson County Jail
Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Kosciusko County Work Release
Lansing Correctional Facility-East
Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Lerdo Pre-Trial
Lew Sterrett Justice Center
Lorain Correctional Institution
Lorton Maximum Security Facility
Lowndes County Jail
Macomb County Jail
Marion County Corrections Facility
Marion County Jail and Law Enforcement Center
Martin Correctional Institution
McHeruy County Government Center
Mesa County Detention Facility
Metro Jefferson Public Safety Building
Metro West Detention Center
Metropolitan Detention Center-Los Angeles
Milwaukee County Jail and Criminal Justice Facility
Minnesota Correctional Facility-Shakopee
Monmouth County Correction Institution
Montgomery County Detention Center
Montgomery County Detention Center
Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility
Nacogdoches County Law Enforcement Center
Naval Consolidated Brig Miramar
Norfolk County Sheriff's Office and Correctional Center
Northeast Probation Detention Center
Northwest Ohio Regional Jail
Northwest Probation Detention Center
Orleans Parish Prison
Oxbow Jail Facility

GA
OH
VA
MS
GA
MN
GA

County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
County jail
County jail
State prison
County jail
State prison
County complex
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
County and city complex
County jail
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
County complex
County complex
State prison
County complex
County complex
County complex
County jail
Federal detention/jail
County complex
State prison
County jail
County jail
County jail
State prison
County complex
Regional jail (military)
County jail
State prison
Regional jail
State prison
County and city jail
County jail

32

IL
FL

GA

co
GA
IL

MI
FL

MD
FL

KS
VA
IN

KS
KS
CA
TX
OH
VA
GA
MI
OR
MO
FL
IL

co
NY
FL

CA
WI
MN

NJ
MD
MD

DE
TX
CA
MA
GA
OH
GA
LA
UT

Page

114
274
316
242
116
236
118
158
88
120
70
122
160
230
90

220
92
184
318
178
186
188
48
306
276
320
124
232
284
248

94
162
72

264
96
50
326
238
258
222
224
82
308
52
228
126
278
128
208
312

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Facility name (continued)

Index

Facility name

State

Facility type

Palm Beach County Stockade
Patuxent Institution
Philadelphia Industrial Correctional Center
Phillips Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Pinellas County Jail
Pueblo County Detention Facility-Work Release
Racine Correctional Institution
Robert H. Babcox Justice Center
Robinson Correctional Center
Rockdale-Dekalb Probation Detention Center
Rogers Correctional Institute
Rusk County Sheriffs Deparnnent
Saguache County Jail
Santa Clara County Main Jail
Saratoga County Law Enforcement Center
Sedgwick County Adult Local Detention Facility
Sedgwick County Work Release
Sergeant William Dickerson Detention Facility
Shawnee County Adult Detention Facility
Sherburne County Jail
South County Detention Facility
Southeast Probation Detention Center
St Bernard Jail Complex
Stanislaus County Public Safety Center
Stanton County Law Enforcement Center
State Correctional Institution at Waymart
Sublette County Jail
Taylorville Correctional Center
Telfair Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Tippecanoe County Law Enforcement Center
Treutlen Shock Unit
Tulane Avenue Facility
U.S. Federal Penitentiary-Atlanta
Varner Unit
Wake County Public Safety Center
Ware Correctional Institute
Warren Correctional Institution
Washington Correctional Institution-Boot Camp
Washington Correctional Institution
West Central Probation Detention Center
West Valley Detention Center
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Western Missouri Correctional Center
Western Probation Detention Center
Will County Adult Detention Facility
Women's Probation Detention Center
Wyandotte County Detention Center
York County Prison

FL

County jail
State prison
City jail
State prison
County jail
County jail
State prison
County complex
State prison
State prison
State prison
County complex
County jail
County complex
County complex
County jail
County jail
County jail
County jail
County complex
County and city jail
State prison
County jail
County jail
County complex
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
County complex
State prison
County and city jail
Federal prison
State prison
County complex
State prison
State prison
State prison_
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
County complex
County jail

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

MD
PA
GA
FL

co
WI
IL
IL
GA
GA
TX

co
CA
NY
KS
KS

MI
KS
MN
CA
GA
LA
CA
KS
PA
WY
IL
GA
IN
GA
LA
GA
AR

NC
GA
OH
GA
GA
GA
CA
IL

MO
GA
IL

GA
KS

PA

Page

98
226
292
130
100
74
328
164

166
132
134
310
76
54
266
190

192
234
194

240
56
136
210
58
196
294
330
168
138
180
140
212
142
36
272
144

280
146

148
150
60
170
250
152
172
154
198
296

33

Section3
Facility Profiles

Varner Unit
Responsible official: Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections

Contact: Dale Reed, Warden, Vamer Unit, Highway 65 South and Highway 388, P.O. Box 600, Grady, AR 71644---0600, 501-479-3311
Architect: Wittenberg, Delany, and Davidson, Savers Federal Building, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-376--6681
Construction Manager: N/A
Facility type: State prison

Total GSF: 117,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 117,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 83,160
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 96
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet Unknown

IIIIDll:tillRIJJIPJl't111

Groundbreaking: September 1985
Finish date: March 1987
Construction time: 18 months

Total: Unknown
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $5,405,400
Housing per inmate: $4,504
Housing per cell: Unknown
Tot.al per inmate: Unknown
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $4,082,438

Structural: Precast concrete frame, load•
bearing masonry
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: Unknown
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring, custom control panels

36

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 1,200
Special population
Single occupancy: 1
Double occupancy: 18
Dorms:0
Tot.al design: 1,219
Current population: Unknown

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 24
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): 57
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Use of barrack

areas
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking, manual locking
Floor swface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), towers, perimeter patrols; costs
excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:43%
Minimum: 57%

Full•fune equivalent
Administration: 29
Security: 153
Programs and treatment: 45
Maintenance: 11
Total:238
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
simple design
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting rune schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design•bid•
build
Finance method: State funds
Use of inmate labor: Moderate; constructed
50% of housing areas
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ!National Directory ofCorrections Construction

Arkansas
Grady

zef·e:'

r
lu.

UJ

"2

....
::i

r

I

!

l

1.!.J.

i

Oayroom

•

■

I

·1
:1

®l
whl
~n;v·

~.t~:';1 ~i~~ ~l.£

=-'---·....
I l;..;.i.:.!I ;
·.•Iii

';'~11:.'•tJ

="'---·--·~; :1· ~

t.'l/..(..-..J'7

Lower Level Sleeping
~;

1')!

1rnnn.
L...: ~,.0L·

~

-HLVl~-!ii:AU'ffl~T :)..&..-s A-tttf" ,.,•?%.
!T'l.~NAL- iNF-1 fl-!IS A ~ . - - _ -

.-------------~-r.-.~"'11

.

:

~

u• I I I I
•ii
H

·.. · ·_· _: /j :·_.1

a-·

_}'

,.I

,..i:""'li_1?tu:~-o

s.J ..

-.;.

,AA

~

:;~6C::JI; ii=--i

'F'

~

.:...--:

.

j1

•

Lower level Sleeping
■

•

Dayroom

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

37

Alameda City Police Department and Jail
Responsible official: Captain, Alameda City

Contact: Bruce Edwards, Captain, Alameda City PoliceDeparb:nentandJail, 1555 Oak Street, Alameda, CA 94501, 510-522-1221
Architect: VBN Architects, 50114th Street, Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612, 510-763-1313
Construction Manager: JW and Sons, 3855 Cypress Drive, Suite A, Petaluma, CA 94954, 707-763-6114

Total GSF: 28,056
Total NSF: 28,056
Corrections GSF: 3,900
Corrections NSF: 3,900
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: 3,496
GSF per inmate (design): 150
GSF per inmate (current): 433
NSF per inmate (design): 150
NSF per inmate (current): 433
Size of cells: 58.5 (single and double),
212.5 (donn)
Net/gross square feet: 100%

Groundbreaking: June 1990
Finish date: November 1991
Construction time: 18 months

Total: $1,800,000
Building only: $1,800,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $800,000
Housing per inmate: $30,769
Housing per cell: $61,538
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $64.16
Total per NSF: $64.16
Total annual operating costs: $509,644

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMU block, brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior srnface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, custom
control panels, satellite/cable

General population
Single occupancy: 4
Double occupancy: 8
Dorms:4
Special population
Single occupancy: 1
Double occupancy: 2
Donns:7
Total design: 26
Current population: January 1993: 9
ye"

"m,IJ.@?'.il§

, '\ w~t 000:!4

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls and
interior of building
Cells per unit: 13
Inmates per unit (design): 26
Inmates per unit (current): 9
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening:2
Midnight: 2

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surrace: Epoxy coating
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common

areas
HVAC: Gas heat, air-conditioning
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 50%
Medium:42%
Minimum:8%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 1
Security: 9
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 0
Total: 10
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1: 1
Contracted services: N/A

W&lltflllfsttt._Bi
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

Contract methcxl: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: General city fund
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

38

NII/National Directory of Corrections Construction

California
Alameda

.\~
,· \

c·,, /\

.,....---....;

,

/

.. .·z

·o

,·

~

...

;

~

1_ .:._ ,-- '.
·~~

-...._

/
\

, _ _J

-.

•

'-

\

t,/'J

Q

cc

\

0

.::

(.)
LU

a.

LU

cc

'\ '-..._

(.)

LU

cc
;

\

i

~~-7

/

...,._:"=="""°__<~hil:_-_,.,
...-...____::i_/
....
I

- -1

''-........:

\

\
:
I

•.

""

\

'[

l,)
0

0

i

\

'·

z

0

~

(.)

u:::

.::
z
LU
e

i
/

/

i
-~

\
,

:l

,___-....

LJI

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

··,

1r·
-f,L.·-·,:

39

Alameda County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Alameda County

Contact: Steven A. Krahnke, Captain, Alameda County Jail, 5325 Broder Boulevard, Dublin, CA 94568, 510--551--6500
Architect: VBN Architects, 50114th Street, Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612, 510--763-1313
Construction Manager: Turner Construction, 353 Sacramento Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111, 415-391-1310

Total GSF: 915,200
Total NSF: 915,200
Corrections GSF: 915,200
Corrections NSF: 915,200
Housing area GSF: 613,200
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 301
GSFper inmate (current): 381
NSF per inmate (design): 301
NSF per inmate (current): 381
Siz.e of cells: 80 (single and double),
728 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 100%

Groundbreaking: March 1986
Finish date: September 1989
Construction time: 40 months

Total: $126,800,000
Building only: $111,200,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $70,300,000
Housing per inmate: $23,155
Housing per cell: $64,142
Total per inmate: $41,765
Total per GSF: $ 139
Total per NSF: $139
Total annual operating costs: $51,780,000

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
cast-in-place concrete frame, precast
concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Exterior
insulation system
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
sUIVeillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alann, satellite/cable

40

General population
Single occupancy: 450
Double occupancy: 900
Donns: 1,536
Special population
Single occupancy: 50
Double occupancy: 100
Donns:0
Total design: 3,036
Current population: December 1991: 2,400

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 100
Inmates per unit (design): 163
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
sUIVeillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
and remote slll"Veillance
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 1

_ ....

Contract methcxi: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance methcxi: State general obligation
bonds, general county fund
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; precast
walls

Door rnaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor swface: Lino/vinyl, carpet, epoxy
coating, sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, forced air,
air-conditioning
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detect:Qrs and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alann, raz.or wire on and
between fence(s), video camera
sUIVeillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 44%
Medium:23%
Minimum:33%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 125
Security: 312
Programs and treatment: 93
Maintenance: 110
Total: 640
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.8: I
Contracted services: Medical, food,
maintenance

IP!~"'llll:•IHlllllllt
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); good
competition
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials,
coordination of design
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

California
Alameda County

0

0:

0

0
0

0

ro

0

...J
LL

0

0

z

0

&1

Cl)

~

~

0

a:

00 Cl

§~

0

0

i

'
i I
/ ~

~0,

'

0.-_

'

0

I

i

~!

-r·-'

0

0:

0

0

::I
w
0

...J

<C

~
~

,fa

I //

~

0
0

a:

~

~

80

8

0

9
LL

0

I0:

a:

Cl

"t5

NJJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Cl)
0

LL

41

Butte County Minimum Security Facility
Responsible official: Sheriff-Coroner, Butte County

Contact: Daniel Gaeeng, Jail Commander, Butte County Minimum Security Facility, 31 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965,
916---538-7447
Architect: Unknown
Construction Manager: Unknown

Total GSF: 7,900
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 7,900
Corrections NSF: Unlmown
Housing area GSF: 7,900
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 82
GSF per inmate (current): 82
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: February 1986
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $1,770,757
Building only: $1,339,738
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unlmown
Total per inmate: $18,445
Total per GSF: $224.15
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $820,696

llllltll&IRJ■!111Bllij
Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: Stucco
Interior walls: Drywall
Exterior surface or facade: Stucco
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring

Doormaterial(s): Unknown
Type(s)of doors: Unlmown
Type(s) oflocks: Unknown
Floor surface: Carpet, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Air-conditioning, heat pumps
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for dorms
Windows: Standard

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Danns: 96
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 96
Currentpopulation:Decemberl991:96

lilillll-1111111

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: I
Inmates per unit (design): 96
Inmates per unit (current): 96
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Alternative
sanctions
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

1»11

Perimeter. Building exterior only, single
fence, double fence, razor wire on fence(s),
video camera surveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 50%
Medium:25%
Minimum: 25%

-~,m

~~~,,mm-;wr•·,,
. •
0;0

,

/('~

~

•· . •

'

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 2
Security: 10
Programs and treatment: 5
Maintenance: 2
Total: 19
Current inmate/staff ratio: 5:1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, good
competition
Negative: High labor costs, government
procedures and regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components,
coordination of design
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Cost shared by multiple
local government jurisdictions
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Unknown

42

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

California
Butte County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

43

ECI: Leo Chesney Women's Center
Responsible official: Deputy Director, California Department of Corrections

Cont.act: Ruth Bluitt, Facility Director, ECI: Leo Chesney Women's Center, 2800 Apricot Street, Live Oak, CA 95953, 916--695-1846
Architect: MZA, 594 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, 415--957--0909
Construction Manager: MZA, 594 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, 415-957--0909

Total GSF: 47,000
Total NSF: 40,000
Corrections GSF: 47,000
Corrections NSF: 40,000
Housing area GSF: 14,400
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 392
GSF per inmate (current): 470
NSF per inmate (design): 333
NSF per inmate (current): 400
Size of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet: 85%

w

Groundbreaking: April 1991
Finish date: March 1992
Construction time: 11 months

Total: $1,650,000
Building only: $1,500,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $1,250,000
Housing per inmate: $10,417
Housing per cell: N/A
Total per inmate: $13,750
TotalperGSF: $35.11
Total per NSF: $41.25
Total annual operating costs: $1,489,800

Structural: Steel frame
Exteriorwalls:CMUblock
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
smveillance, staff intercommunication,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, perimeter detection/alarm, satellite/
cable

44

-General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns: 120
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0

..fl-~

Doormaterial(s): NIA
Type(s) of doors: N/A
Type(s) oflocks: N/A
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: One-way to common areas
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Wood, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for common areas, manual
alarm stations
Windows: Standard and bars

arnfruwaq

Dorms:O

Perimeter: Single fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on
fence(s), video camera surveillance; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:25%
Minimum: 75%

Total design: 120
Current population: June 1992: 100

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 6
Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 60
Inmates per unit (current): 60
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
TotaJ officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight 1

Contract method: Turnkey design-build
Finance method: Rent from a private owner
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited;
maintenance building

Security: 20

Programs and treatment: 5
Maintenance: 6
Total:37
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.7:1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplie½governmentprocedures
and regulations

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

California
Live Oak

l

0 0
00
0 0
0 0
0 0

D

0
0

0 0

Ooo

8 000
□
0
□
Ei]

~

C

C

0

□
□
Q

0

do
g
Ooa o

0
0

0

□

G

G

G

G

A.
B.

C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I,
J.

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

DORMITORY
GUARD STATION
RECREATION AREA

TOILET ROOM
SHOWER ROOM
LAUNDRY
OFFICE
MECHANICAL ROOM
STORAGE

ENTRY

45

Federal Detention Center-Dublin
Responsible official: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Contact: Loy Hayes, Federal Correctional Institution-Pleasanton, 5765 Eighth Street, Camp Parks, Dublin, CA 94568, 510--833--7500
Architect: Unknown
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 31,500
Total NSF: 27,950
Corrections GSF: Unknown
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 28,200
Housing area NSF: 24,250
GSF per inmate (design): Unknown
GSF per inmate (current): Unlo1own
NSF per irunate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Siz.e of cells: 88 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 89%

Groundbreaking: September 1987
Finish date: June 1989
Construction time: 9 months

Total: $7,838,100
Building only: $6,418,500
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $5,721,600
Housing per inmate: $28,608
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $39,990
Total per GSF: $248
Total per NSF: $213
Total annual operating costs: $4,076,800

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: Precast panels
Exterior surface or facade: Stucco
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door controVmonitoring, perimeter
detection/alann, lighting protection,
inmate intercoms, card access, custom
control panels

46

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 200
Donns:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 36

Donns:O
Total design: 236
Current population: May 1993: 196

illllilliill811llll4~ililll
Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 50
Inmates per unit (design): 100
fumates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cell, multipurpose areas
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Conventional design-bid
build
Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s ): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
· Intercom: Two-way to cells, one-way to
common areas
HVAC: Air-conditioning, gas
Plumbing: China, stainless
Furniture: Steel, wood, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann station
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter
detection/alann, razor wire on and
between fence(s), perimeter patrols, video
camera surveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:3%
Medium:97%
Minimum:O

cg.r;w-~
,m,-;~~,,,
~2..'fficirnr110~~~llii&lli[l1l§ijlii~
" ,
· ,§llli11iil~qhlh li\[4Fdfuiw;:,Wom'W'""ilr'."'
\i';;'w,.i,,.~~,w.~~•w" ' ,;,

i.

·~{ffif§fili~f@.i;,~kWiJYJlli:..~iM@

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 2
Security: 16
Programs and treatment 2
Maintenance: 0
Total:20
Current inmate/staff ratio: 6.3: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, less expensive
materials and hardware
Negative: Difficult site conditions,
contractor perfonnance
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Slow responses and deliveries
from vendors and suppliers, contractor's
methods of construction

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

California
Dublin

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

47

Lerdo Pre-Trial
Responsible official: Sheriff, Kem County

Contact: Danny Harris, Commander, Lerdo Pre-Trial, 17695 Industrial Fann Road, Bakersfield, CA 93308--9770, 805-861-7901
Architect: N/A
Construction Manager: N/A

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: February 1993
Construction time: Unknown

Total: Unknown
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: Unknown
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMUblock
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior surface or facade: Natural wall,
CMUblock
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels

48

Total GSF: Unknown
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: Unknown
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): Unknown
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Siz.e of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging, sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Unknown
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Air-conditioning, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Special security

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 1,104
Donns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Total design: 1,104
Current population: April 1993: 950

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:0
Minimum:0

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: %

Inmates per unit (design): 192
Inmates per unit (current): 192
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, second bunk permanently
attached

Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight 1

-

-Full-time equivalent
Administration: 14
Security: 107
Programs and treatment: 33
Maintenance: 1
Total: 155
Current inmate/staff ratio: 6.1: 1
Contracted services: Commissary

-

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations

Contract method: N/A
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: Limited; welding
assistance
Use of prefabrication: Limited; furniture

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

California
Kem County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

49

Metropolitan Detention Center-Los Angeles
Responsible official: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Contact: Wayne H. Seifert, Warden, Metropolitan Detention Center-Los Angeles, 535 North Alameda Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012-1500, 213--485--0439
Architect: Ellerbe Becket, Inc., 2501 Colorado Avenue, Third Roor, Santa Monica, CA 90404-3585, 310-829-4000
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 272,258
Total NSF: 239,600
Corrections GSF: 272,258
Corrections NSF: 239,600
Housing area GSF: 178,500
Housing area NSF: 157,000
GSF per inmate (design): 463
GSF per inmate (current): 267
NSFperinmate (design): 407
NSF per inmate (current): 235
Size of cells: 77 (single and double)
Nel/gross square feet: 88%

Groundbreaking: November 1986
Finish date: December 1988
Construction time: 23 months

Total: $40,000,000
Building only: $35,500,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $23,600,000
Housing per inmate: $57,843
Housing per cell: $57,843
Total per inmate: $68,027
Total per GSF: $146.92
Total per NSF: $166.94
Total annual operating costs: $18,989,681

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block, granite.clad precast
futerior walls: CMU block, reinforced
security drywall
Exterior surface or facade: Textured and
colored concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, card access, custom control
panels, perimeter detection/alarm

50

-

General population
Single occupancy: 408
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 180
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 588
Current population: November 1992: 1,019

-

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 136
fumates per unit (design): 136
fumates per unit (current): 235
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells, second bunk pennanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day: I
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast
concrete panels, metal enclosures,
millwork

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking, manual locking
Floor surface: Lino/sheet vinyl, sealed
concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, gas heat
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Sprinklers for cells and
common areas
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior, single fence,
perimeter detection/alann, video camera
surveillance, wire enclosed elevated
terraces; costs included

hnnate security level
Maximum: 10%
Medium:90%
Minimum:O

-

Full-time equivalent
Administration:40
Security: 210
Programs and treatment: 75
Maintenance: 25
Total:350
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.9: 1
Contracted services: N/A

-

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, coordination of
design
Negative: NIA

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

California
Los Angeles

...

lll
...

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

51

Navfil Consolidated Brig Miramar
R,esponsible official: Commanding Officer, U.S. Navy

Contact: Captain J.E. Brown, Commanding Officer, U.S. Navy, Naval Consolidated Brig Miramar, 46141 Miramar Way,
Suite 1, San Diego, CA 92145-5499, 619-537-7001
Architect: Rosser Justice Systems, 524 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30308, 404--876--3800
Construction Manager: N/A

.....•,

Total GSF: 190,000
Total NSF: 122,000
Corrections GSF: 190,000
Corrections NSF: 122,000
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 430
GSFperinmate (current): 864
NSF per inmate (design): 275
NSF per inmate (current): 554
Size of cells: 80 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 64%

Groundbreaking: August 1987
Finish date: October 1989
Construction time: 26 months

Total: $20,000,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $10,100,000
Housing per inmate: $25,250
Housing per cell: $25,250
Total per inmate: $37,923
Total per GSF: $88.42
Total per NSF: $137.70
Total annual operating costs: $4,032,870

Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing CMU
block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block, metal stud with
gypsum ooard
Exterior surface or facade: Stucco, prefab.
metal panels
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels,
satellite/cable, metal detection, watch
tower system

52

General population
Single occupancy: 400
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 3
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:40
Total design: 443
Current population: January 1993: 250

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 20
Inmates per unit (design): 20
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: NJA
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited;
preengineered steel frame and
prefabricated metal panels

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm, general paging
throughout
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, gas heat,
forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, video camera surveillance; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 4.5%
Medium: 15.5%
Minimum: 80

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 54
Security: 60
Programs and treatment: 35
Maintenance: 20
Total:169
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.5: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods, less
expensive materials
Negative:Highlaoorcosts
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

4

,---__...--t

/

I

///

I

•

//

':::lt--+-11

I

1

1

I
I ">---+-111
I
I
I
I

I ..........._..

_j

2

TYPICAL HOUSING UNIT
GROUND FLOOR PLAN

1. DAY ROOM

2. CASE MANAGER
3.
4.
5.
6.

COUNSELOR
QUIET ROOM
STAFF 10ILET
JANI10RIAL

3

Santa Clara County Main Jail
Responsible official: Board of Supervisors, Santa Clara County Department of Corrections

Contact: Bob Conroy, Acting Director, Department of Corrections, Santa Oara County Main Jail, 150 West Hedding Street, San Jose, CA
95110, 408--299--4005
Architect: Dworsky and Associates, 3530 Wilshire Bloulevard, Suite 1000, Los Angeles, CA 90010--2300, 213-380--9100
Construction Manager: 0 'Brien Kreitzberg, Bayside Plaza 188 The Embarcadero, San Francisco, CA 94111, 415-777--0188

Total GSF: 331,000
Tot.al NSF: 264,800
Corrections GSF: 223,144
Corrections NSF: 178,515
Housing area GSF: 132,155
Housing area NSF: 105,600
GSF per inmate (design): 460
GSF per inmate (current): 460
NSF per inmate (design): 368
NSF per inmate (current): 368
Size of cells: 123 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 80%

Groundbreaking: October 1987
Finish date: October 1989
Construction time: 24 months

Tot.al: $54,500,000
Building only: $51,700,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $20,087,560
Housing per inmate: $27,899
Housing per cell: $46,500
Tot.al per inmate: N/A
Tot.al per GSF: $164.65
Tot.al per NSF: $205.82
Tot.al annual operating costs: $29,774,679

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Colored concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels

54

General population
Single occupancy: 432
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 224
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 64
Tot.al design: 720
Current population: April 1992: 720

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 48
Inmates per unit (design): 48
Inmates per unit (current): 48
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight 2

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild, multiple bid packages (fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds, cost shared by many local
goverment jurisdictions
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; exterior
precast panels

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells
HVAC: Air-conditioning, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 20%
Medium: 80%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 8
Security: 343
Programs and treatment: 74
Maintenance: 57
Total:482
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.5: 1
Contracted services: Transportation

IBlllll~i■IUl!fl!llililJli
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, less
expensive materials
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems;
claims-oriented contractor
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems; separate bid
packages

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

California
Santa Clara County

49•-o·

Q

;.,

y

7

~

~

I

+-----------3'-10"
83'-0"

44'-0"

210'-0"

rEb
N

TYPICAL MEZZANINE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
LEVELS 4M THRU SM

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

o·--8r-_,•6.....

55

South County Detention Facility
Responsible official: Sheriff, San Mateo County

Contact: Don Horsley, Lieutenant, South County Detention Facility, 330 Bradford Street, Redwood City, CA 94063, 415--363-4314
Architect: Patrick Sullivan Associates, 110 Harvard Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711, 909-624-4051
Construction Manager: SJ. Amorroso Construction Company, 348 Hatch Drive, Foster City, CA 94404, 415--349--0691

Total GSF: 44,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 44,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 18,432
HousingareaNSF: U,460
GSF per inmate (design): 275
GSF per inrnatt: (current): 78
NSF per inmatt: (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 200 (double), 350 (donn)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Groundbreaking: September 1986
Finish date: February 1988
Construction time: 17 months

Total: $6,300,000
Building only: $5,600,000
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $4,000,000
Housing per inmate: $25,000
Housing per cell: $166,667
Total per inmate: $39,375
Total perGSF: $143.18
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Steel frame, precastconcrete,
concrete block
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: Metal stud, gypsum board,
concrete block
Exterior swface or facade: Textured
concrete
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, paging and sound system,
duress/fire alarm, door control/monitoring

56

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 32
Dorms: 128
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 160
Current population: March 1993: 220

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 8
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells
Total officers per unit
Day:N/A
Evening: N/A
Midnight: NIA

Door matt:rial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: One-way to common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Sprinklers for common
areas
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium: 100%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 21
Security: 139
Programs and treatment: 2
Maintenance: 2
Total: 164
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.3: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods, less
expensive matt:rials
Negative: NIA
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Statt: general obligation
bonds, proposition 52+86
Use of inmate labor: Limited
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast
panels

NJJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

California
San Mateo County

@j--1______,/
i
!
i

~

;

f

!

~

L____j

I

D

7
_j
-----,
__J

7

L

►D
n~-.

~
_j

~:

;

==;

-

I

- -

Ig
I

I_,_
i

r--

1--,~

i----'.
f--t

•

•--

I

,

g

~ti

I!ru'.~ _,1_

r-----:

H

~

I ---+---------o-1

i---H
f-+--:

NJJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

57

Stanislaus County Public Safety Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Stanislaus County

Contact: George Lake, Lt Facility Commander, Stanislaus County Public Safety Center, 200 East Hackett Road, Modesto, CA 95351,
209-558-1054
Architect: SMP/The Design Partnership Joint Venture, 375 Fremont, Suite 200, San Francisco, CA 94105, 415-777-3737
Construction Manager: O'Brien-Kreitzberg, 200 East Hackell Road, Modesto, CA 95351, 209-541-2900
f

<

-

'

~t!iliifr

Total GSF: 99,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 99,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 337
GSF per inmate (current): 544
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 70 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Dilflll
General population
Groundbreaking: November 1990
Finish date: August 1992
Construction time: 21 months

Total: $19,219,000
Building only: $17,707,000
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $16,831,000
Housing per inmate: $75,138
Housing per cell: $75,138
Total per inmate: $65,371
TotalperGSF: $194.13
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $2,300,000

Structural: Concrete block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block, plaster
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door control/
monitoring, card access, custom control
panels, satellite/cable

58

■l'i

Single occupancy: 224
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 70
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 294
CUrrent population: March 1993: 182

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 56
Inmates per unit (design): 56
Inmates per unit (current): 56
l'vlanagementtype (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Federal court
imposed cap
Total officers per unit
Day: l
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

'

Doormaterial(s): Wood, steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Carpet, sealed concrete, vinyl
tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas, inmate duress alann
HVAC: Hot/chilled HVAC system
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture: Wood, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 24%
Medium:76%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 1
Security: 38
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 2
Total:41
CUrrent inmate/staff ratio: 4.4: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, less expensive materials
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds, local general fund
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

· · -NIJ!NationalDirectory of CorrectionsConstruction

California
Stanislaus County

SPECIAL HOUSING

LEGEND_
L typi,.lCcll
i. H.ondi<>pped Cell
3. D•y,oom/Dlnlng
4. St~ff Statioo

s.Showe..'-- Handlcapp,!d ShoYr'l!r
7, L801Jdey Holi:'ling:

s. Food Servtce Pantcy
9. StaflT•illet

10,lntl;'lrYl-ew
U. Multipttrpose
l:2. Janjt-o-r-'s CloSitt
13. SoUyPort
ldi. OuldoorRcc. Ya.-rd
lS.Eleclr'h:a.1
16.Mechanl-t.al
17."Exnm RGom

lS.J;:umToUd
19. S111-ragc
10. Inm:11le Conidor
21.SlaffOffl-ce
22, Llnen Storage
2,3. St:1.lf Bn:uk Roam
:W. Tr.ash Roortl%5. Comma.r.ali:ations
26. lnmu.te Vt$1Ung B1JOlb

17. Visttor's Dootb
28. Hand.leappcd Inmate Visit In:;:: Booth
29. Handicapped Vl:sUor's Boot'&
30. Vi.sJt~r-'.s Lobby
31,Elewlnr
3:2. E!evalur F.qu:lpment

___ .Jl.lllllll!IBi:::·L ............ i

33.StoJr
34. Conlral Rooin

35. E:dt Stnl-r

MEDIUM SECURITY
.HOUSING
14

.--=:. !.. -.......... :

INMATE HOUSING - LOWER LEVEL

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

59

West Valley Detention Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, San Bemadino County

Contact: Ronald W. Bieberdorf, Captain, West Valley Detention Center, 9500 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739,
714--463--5010
Architect: Rosser Justice Systems, 524 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30308, 404-876--3800
Construction Manager: Heery-Vanir, 660 J Street, Suite 285, Sacramento, CA 95814, 916--448--8474

Total GSF: 726,000
Total NSF: 442,000
Corrections GSF: 726,000
Corrections NSF: 442,000
Housing area GSF: 705,000
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate (design): 317
GSFperinmate (current): 323
NSF per inmate (design): 193
NSF per inmate (current): 196
Size of cells: 82 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: 61 %

GroWldbreaking: January 1989
Finish date: July 1991
Construction time: 31 months

_Total: $96,340,000
Building only: $88,443,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $59,600,000
Housing per inmate: $27,289
Housing per cell: $50,253
Total per inmate: $42,033
Total per GSF: $132.70
Total per NSF: $218.00
Total annual operating costs: $27,180,000

Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame, load-bearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block,
E.I.S.
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sollild system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, card
access, custom control panels, satellite/
cable, watch tower system, metal detection

60

General population
Single occupancy: 400
Double occupancy: 1,400
Donns: 384
Special population
Single occupancy: 42
Double occupancy: 66
Donns:0
Total design: 2,292
Current population: February 1993: 2,251

Doorrnaterial(s}: Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas, inmate duress alarm, general paging
to all areas
HVAC: Gas heat, forced air, ice storage
system
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, video camera surveillance; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 18%
Medium:64%
Minimum: 18%

!~~~~•11!1'FP~~-1w
~t!f~ll!i~~&~~tw.rnl~=im' ·~ ' •:ffi
Design: Modular/pod
Cells perllilit: 74
Inmates per unit (design): 144
Inmates per unit (current): 144
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, mattresses on floor,
second bunk pennanently attached

Total officers per unit
Day: I
Evening: 1
Midnight: I

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 8
Security: 290
Programs and treatment: 142
Maintenance: 15
Total:455
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4.9: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods, less
expensive materials
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, high labor costs
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track)
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

California
San Bemadino County

I
.

l

i

~

'

nO
~

•

. ~,.....,-,,,;,..
...,.

.

~-

•

i

• . j,,-,q:

,_

7
. .

!

.

."

I

~
I'

n

i

i

!

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

61

Alamosa County Detention Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Alamosa County

Contact: Captain John Bianca, Jail Administrator, Alamosa County Detention Center, 1315 17th Street, Alamosa, CO 81101,
719-589--6600
Architect: E. George Wynn-Architect, 52499 County Road, ''T'', Saguache, CO 81149
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 23,295
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 12,098
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 12,098
Housing area NSF: 11,579
GSFperinmate (design): 252
GSF per inmate (current): 605
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Siz.e of cells: 70 (single), 140 (double)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: May 1985
Finish date: September 1986
Construction time: 16 months

Total: $2,900,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $1,270,290
Housing per inmate: $31,757
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $124.49
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $428,724

Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing CMU
block
Exterior walls: C:MU block
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block, steel stud, drywall
Exterior surlace or facade: Stucco, natural
wall, fluted concrete block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, custom
control panels, AM-FM broadcast radio,
UHF television

62

General population
Single occupancy: 14
Double occupancy: 14
Dorms: 12
Special population
Single occupancy: 4
Double occupancy: 4
Dorms:0
Total design: 48
Currentpopulation:Decemberl991:20

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 25
Inmates per unit (design): 44
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds, fixed financing rate
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking, solenoid
driven and remote locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, solar heat,
gas heat
Plumbing: China, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, razor
wire on fence(s), video camera
surveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 35.3%
Medium: 31.4%
Minimum: 33.3%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 1
Security: 16
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 2
Total: 19
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
continuous participation by design
architect
Negative: Prefabricated "specializ.ed
detention" equipment
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
advanced order of materials, coordination
of design, continuous architectural
supervision in the field
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Colorado
Alamosa County

2

~·

Q;}

~
I(

~

II.;

d
iZ
:,

ir.,

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

63

Arapahoe County Justice Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Arapahoe County

Contact: Frank W. Henn, Captain, Arapahoe County Justice Center, 7375 South Potomac Street, Englewood, CO 80112-4030,
303--649-0960
Architect: Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall, 410 17th Street, Suite 300, Denver, CO 80202, 303-842-1300
Construction Manager: CRSS Constructors, Inc., 216 16th Street Mall, Suite 1700, Denver, CO 80202, 303-820--5200

Total GSF: 360,000
Total NSF: 315,000
Corrections GSF: 208,000
Corrections NSF: 182,000
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 287
GSF per inmate (current): 265
NSF per inmate (design): 251
NSF per inmate (current): 232
Size of cells: 74 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: 88%

Bltllillllillllllall
Groundbreaking: December 1984
Finish date: January 1987
Construction time: 25 months

Total: $31,589,293
Building only: $28,914,933
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $15,857,350
Housing per inmate: $24,063
Housing per cell: $39,251
Total per inmate: N/A
TotalperGSF: $87.75
Total per NSF: $100.28
Total annual operating costs: $12,449,767

Wt1.JlilPJSi!lli&l1il1
Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing
masonry
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, custom
control panels

General population
Single occupancy: 49
Double occupancy: 610
Donns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 35
Double occupancy: 30
Dorms: 0
Total design: 724
Current population: March 1993: 786

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 16
fumates per unit (design): 16
fumates per unit (current): 16
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
permanently attached to wall
Total officers per unit
Day:4
Evening:4
Midnight: 1

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Other energy recycle unit, hot.
water
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit and special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:0
Minimurn:O

- ~...~~f°il1iilfi'!!}illh,L·~~1:~
§JS~~~~fm.~~~1~&!,JhMOO~~m~
Full-time equivalent
.Administration: 4
See~ty: 166
Programs and treatment: 10
Maintenance: 63
Total:242
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.2: 1
Contracted services: Medical, food, library,
commissary

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track)
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Phased construction (fast track)
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds

Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast roof
and floor tees

64

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Colorado
Arapahoe County

-ti._.,,
.

J.

.-

..

-1~-q~~

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

65

Boulder County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Boulder Cowity

Contact: Charles Pringle, Captain, Boulder County Jail, 3200 Airport Road, Boulder, CO 80302, 303--441-3634
Architect: Lescher & Mahoney, 102 North Cascade, Suite 300, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, 719--634-1842
Construction Manager: G.E. Johnson, P.O. Box 2139, Colorado Springs, CO 80901, 719--473--5320

Total GSF: 104,000
Total NSF: 74,620
Corrections GSF: 104,000
Corrections NSF: 74,620
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFper inmate (design): 334
GSFperinmate (current): 374
NSF per inmate (design): 240
NSF per inmate (current): 268
Size of cells: 76 (single and double),
1,390 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 72%

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking, manual locking
Floor surlace: Carpet, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells
HVAC: Gas heat, air-conditioning
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture: Steel, wood, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Rfflilffli~~ifillfilWi&

~~~~~=•r~

Groundbreaking: August 1986
Finish date: August 1988
Construction time: 18 months

Total: $14,250,000
Building only: $10,639,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $4,250,000
Housing per inmate: $19,585
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $45,820
Total per GSF: $137.02
Total per NSF: $190.97
Total annual operating costs: $3,803,342

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
precast concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block,
drywall, glass
Exterior surlace or facade: Colored concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels

66

General population
Single occupancy: 136
Double occupancy: 48
'. Dorms: 34
Special population
Single occupancy: 31
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:62
Total design: 311
Current population: Februaiy 1993: 278

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 48
Inmates per unit (design): 48
Inmates per unit (current): 48
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: CM/GC with guaranteed
maximum price
Finance method: Lease-purchase
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited

Perimeter: Building exterior only, perimeter
patrols and detection/alarm, video camera
surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 28%
Medium:30%
Minimum: 42%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 6
Security: 81
Programs and treatment: 22
Maintenance: 2
Total: 111
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.5: 1
Contracted services: N/A

filil~r~w.~~~itwTu"I

~~~~

Factors affecting construction~
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, advanced order of
materials, coordination of design
Negative: Weather problems, client changes

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Colorado
Boulder County

"LO',INCiil111

"

LOUlilOl:1!

•

AREA B, AREA C

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

,:;;:;:::,

67

Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center
Responsible official: Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections

Cont.act: Danice Neal, Warden, Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center, 10900 East Smith Road, Denver, CO 80239, 303-375-2000
Architect: Hoover, Berg, Desmond, 1645 Grant Street, Denver, CO 80202, 303-837--8811
Construction Manager: CRSS Constructors, fuc., 216 16th Street Mall, Suite 1700, Denver, CO 80202, 303-820-5200

Total GSF: 273,523
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 273,523
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate (design): 589
GSF per inmate (current): 622
NSF per inmate (design}: Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 72 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

~1!!■11111-llllill

Groundbreaking: February 1989
Finish date: February 1991
Construction time: 23 months

Total: $36,000,000
Building only: $32,300,000
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $18,000,000
Housing per inmate: $47,368
Housing per cell: $53,571
Total per inmate: $77,586
Total per GSF: $131.62
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $12,193,978

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame, precast concrete frame, loadbearing structural masonry
Exterior walls: CMU block
futerior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels, perimeter detection/alarm,
satellite/cable, facility management system

68

General population
Single occupancy: 292
Double occupancy: 88
Dorms: 0
Special population
Single occupancy: 52
Double occupancy: 32
Dorms:0
Total design: 464
Current population: March 1992: 440

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit Unknown
fumates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current}: Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
pennanently attached
Tot.al officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight:2

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Proceeds from State lotto
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast wall
panels and floor

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote and manual
locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete, colored
concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas, inmate duress alann
HVAC: Hot water
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers, video camera
surveillance; fence shaker; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 13%
Medium:87%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 20
Security: 134
Programs and treatment: 80
Maintenance: 26
Total:260
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.7: 1
Contracted services: Food

a1itllJ!tWllllllllill
Factors affecting construction costs

Positive: Simple construction methods,
phasedconstruction(fasttrack);good
competition
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track)
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Building Services

Warehouse/Canteen

Recreation Yard

96 Inmate Cells

Food Service

Mec1ical Clinic

Huerfa·no County Law Enforcement Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Huerfano County

Contact: Harold Martinez, Sheriff, Huerfano County Law Enforcement Center, 111 West Fifth Street, Walsenburg, CO 81089,
719-738-1600
Architect: E. George Wynn-Architect, 52499 County Road ''T," Saguache, CO 81149, 719--655-2247
Construction Manager: N/A
·

Total GSF: 16,381
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 11,606
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 9,166
Housing area NSF: 5,674
GSF per inmate (design): 431
GSF per inmate (current): 712
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 79.1 (single), 104-(double)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Groundbreaking: August 1988
Finish date: September 1989
Construction time: 13 months

Total: $1,780,000
Building only: $1,780,000
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $1,334,575
Housing per inmate: $38,131
Housing per cell: $70,241
Total per inmate: NIA
Total per GSF: $108.66
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $297,826

Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing CMU
block
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMUblock
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block, metal stud/drywall/plaster
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
(textured)
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels, AM-FM radio-netwruk,
TV radio dispatch-sheriff's deparlment

70

General population
Single occupancy: 3
Double occupancy: 32
Dorrns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 2
Dorms:O
Total design: 39
Current population: January 1993: 23

Design: Circular, cells on outside wall
Cells per unit: 16
Inmates per unit (design): 32
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 3
Midnight: 2

· ~-,. ~,~, ~?!1111

~ ~~

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local special, time-limited
tax levy
Use of inmate labor. None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote and manual
locking
Floor surface: Lino/sheet vinyl, carpet,
sealed concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas, inmate duress alarm, medical and
judicial duress alarm
HVAC: Gas heat, forced air, prewash, air
handling, recirculating and fresh air
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, manual alarm stations,
duct-fire and smoke detectors
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, double
fence, razor wire on and between fence(s),
video camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 19%
Medium:25%
Minimum: 25%
Special handling and female: 31 %

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 1
Security: IO
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 0
Total: 11
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.1: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: NIA
Negative: N/A

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Colorado
Huerfano County

0

.
...
10

0

!-·.-;

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

71

Mesa County Detention Facility
Responsible official: Sheriff, Mesa County

Contact: Dennis Berry, AdministratorofDetention, Mesa Coooty Detention Facility, 215 Rice Street. Grand Junction, CO 81501,
303--244-3352
Architect: HD.R., Inc., 12700 Hillcrest Road, Dallas, TX 75230--2096, 214--960--400)
Construction Manager: G.E. Johnson Construction, Box 2139, Colorado Springs, CO 80901, 719--473--5321

Total GSF: 118,543
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 93,438
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 44,522
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 487
GSF per inmate (current): 754
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 70 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: September 1990
Finish date: Jooe 1992
Construction time: 21 months

Total: $15,700,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $132.44
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $2,527,471

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
precast concrete frame and cells
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Exposed
aggregate/tinted
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring, card access, custom control
panels

72

General population
Single occupancy: 164
Doubleoccupancy:0
Dorms:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 28
Double occupancy: 0

Dorms:O
Total design: 192
Current population: January 1992: 124-

-

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 96
Inmates per unit (design): 96
Inmates per unit (current): 96
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Alternative
sentencing
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight 1

-

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Lease-purchase
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Extensive; precast
concrete panels, plumbing stacks, air
handling equipment

Doormaterial(s): Wood, steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging, sliding
Type(s) of locks: Manual locking, motor
driven and remote locking
Floor surface: Carpet, sealed concrete, vinyl
tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells
HYAC: Gas heat, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic, concrete
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common areas, manual alann stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, video camera srnveillance; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum:8%
Medium: 16%
Minimum: 76%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 9
Security: 47
Programs and treatment: 11
Maintenance: 1
Total:68
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.8: I
Contracted services: Medical, dietician

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Phased construction, fast track
management
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Phased construction, fast track
management. contaminated soil

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Colorado
Mesa County

-

~f

0
0
0

,_-----.._

IT!T

.

'

I

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

73

Pueblo County Detention Facility-Work Release
Responsible official: Sheriff, Pueblo County

Contact: Warren Carere, Facility Admmistrator, Pueblo County Detention Facility-Work Release, 909 Court Street, Pueblo, CO 81003,
719-546-6135

Architect: Hurtig, Gardner & Froilich Architects, Inc., 429 West 10th Street, Pueblo, CO 81003
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 2,600
Total NSF: 2,560
Corrections GSF: 2,600
Corrections NSF: 2,560
Housing area GSF: 2,600
Housing area NSF: 2,560
GSF per inmate (design): 93
GSF per inmate (current): 124
NSF per inmate (design): 91
NSF per inmate (current): 122
Size of cells: 2,400 (dolTil)
Net/gross square feet: 98.5%

11~141Billllllifltlli11
Groundbreaking: September 1990
Finish date: December 1990
Construction time: 4 months

Total: Unknown
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $234,000
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: Unknown
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 28
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 28
Current population: December 1991: 21

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit 1
Inmates per unit (design): 28
Inmates per unit (current): 21
Management type (design): Remote

surveillanc.e
Management type (current): Intermittent
Structural: Precast concrete frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, door controVmonitoring, card

surveillance
Means to handle crowding: N/A

Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: I
Midnight: 1

~~41!~
Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking
Floor swface: Epoxy coating
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Manual alann stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
excluded
fumate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%
W.iiffiW$@Wh"D~~JWIBB'~~Ji'ia

,~m.111tlMmiwA~~
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 3
Security: 100
Programs and treatment: 12
Maintenance: 6
Total: 121
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Food

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

access

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

74

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Colorado
Pueblo County

&~
v~

~*+.I ()

_,4)
,D

"-9

,p-.

C

"v-I
~

~~

$

<'

.J,_✓.rJ"
~ . ,,.<(i,;_f'

~

~

=-====..--;-.:--;Iv~

'

.fi'r 'f!I" -4"

m--

•.

-

~

-•

-~

""v1

~

-\0

~

r

t:t-+---::1
NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

75

Saguache County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Saguache County

Contact: Ronald Franz, Jail Administrator, Saguache County Jail, 530 Fifth Street, Saguache, CO 81149-0265, 719-655-2544
Architect: Larry Zimmer, 530FifthStreet, Saguache, CO 81149, 719-655-2544
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 800
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 800
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 100
GSFper inmate (current): 100
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 120 (double), 257.5 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 100%

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: July 1988
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $8,000
Building only: $6,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Totalperinrnate: $1,000
Total per GSF: $10
Total per NSF: $10
Total annual operating costs: $107,778

••, _
Structural: Unknown
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Natural wall
Electronic technology systems: Unknown

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 2
Dorms: 6
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 8
Currentpopulation:December1991:8

~-~wA~~111111I11
~~lffl~ai~=~~.M~cw>~,,@~•, ..
Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
hunates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Door material(s): Unknown
Type(s)of doors: Unknown
Type(s) oflocks: Unknown
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Unknown
HVAC: Unknown
Plumbing: Unlmown
Furniture: Unknown
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
Windows: Security screens

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: Unknown
Medium: Unknown
Minimum: Unknown

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 1
Security: 3
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 0
Total:4
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2: 1
Contracted services: Medical, transportation

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Phased construction (fast track)
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Weather problems

~-•-•~"<
.
½Sm
.
Cffi

-

~~,/@~·~~
:@13/4~
-~~ .. _<i=?h<'.>'?¥4

Contract method: Unknown
Finance method: Budgeted with general
fund tax money
Use of inmate labor: Extensive; physical
labor with compensation (good time)
Use of prefabrication: None

76

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Colorado
Saguache County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

77

Alexander Cybulski Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Corrections

Contact: Ed Anington, Warden-CRCI, Alexander Cybulski Correctional Institution, 264 Bilton Road, Box 775, Somers, CT 06071,
203-566-1657
Architect: Stecker, LaBau, Ameill, McManus Architects, 80 Glastonbury Boulevard, Glastonbury, CT 06033--4400, 203-657-8077
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 101,622
Total NSF: 84,096
Corrections GSF: 101,622
Corrections NSF: 84,096
Housing area GSF: 46,00)
Housing area NSF: 34,812
GSFper inmate (design): 339
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSFperinmate (design): 280
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 100 (double), 207 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 83%
llfa~&r~~1m¥i.;'~~:~~.-m?~ilC?Ji.-:~I■

,mf~~~~~-Wlic~c~illl:tft:!J!,

Groundbreaking: April 1990
Finish date: February 1992
Construction time: 22 months

Total: $8,452,00)
Building only: $7,398,707
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $28,173
Total per GSF: $83.17
Total per NSF: $100.50
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick, metal
panel
Interior walls: CMU block, GWB
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, CMU
block, metal panel
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels

78

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 12
Dorms: 288
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 300
Current population: July 1993: 300

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote and manual
locking
Floor surface: Carpet, vinyl tile, epoxy
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm
HYAC: Gas heat, fmced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for common areas, manual
alarm stations
Windows: Tempered units in commercial
frame, insulating

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, perimeter patrols, video camera
surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:O
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: 184
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.6: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, less expensive materials
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Connecticut
Somers

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

79

Garner Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction

Contact: Frank Crose, Warden, Gamer Correctional Institute, 817 Sandy Hook, CT 06482, 203--270--2800
Architect: Rosser Justice Systems, 524 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30308, 404-876--3800
Construction Manager: Turner Construction, P.O. Box 817, Nunnawauk Road, Sandy Hook, CT 06482, 203--270--0325

Total GSF: 240,000
Total NSF: 160,000
Corrections GSF: 240,000
Corrections NSF: 160,000
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate (design): 313
GSFper inmate (current): 462
NSF per inmate (design): 200
NSF per inmate (current): 308
Size of cells: 80 (single and double), 300
(holding)
Net/gross square feet: 67%

Groundbreaking: September 1990
Finish date: November 1992
Construction time: 60 months

Total: $39,400,000
Building only: $37,200,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $19,500,000
Housing per inmate: $28,098
Housing per cell: $48,030
Total per inmate: $51,436
Total perGSF: $164-.17
Total per NSF: $246.25
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing CMU
block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block, metal stud with
gypsum board
Exterior surface or facade: Natural wall,
CMUblock
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, card
access, custom control panels, satellite/
cable, watch tower system, metal detection

80

General population
Single occupancy: 118
Double occupancy: 576
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 32
Double occupancy: 40
Dorms:0
Total design: 766
Current population: April, 1993: 520

-

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

---■

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds

Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alann, general paging
throughout
HVAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat, forced
air, heat recovery chiller for domestic
water preheating
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture:Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 17%
Medium:69%
Minimum: 14%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treaunent: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: N/A
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track)
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, high labor costs, difficult
site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track);
coordination of design
Negative: Weather problems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

.Connecticut
Sandy Hook

,......

(.----

.

....', ,

w,

~-✓
....:;.

,J
.
..r-·

_":_.,

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

81

Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility
Responsible official: Director, Delaware Department of Corrections

Contact: Elirabeth Neal, Warden Il, Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility, 1301 East 12th Street, Box 9279, Wilmington, DE 19809,
302-429--7747
Architect: Vitetta Group, 642 North Broad Street, The Wallace Building, Philadelphia, PA 19130, 215-235-3500
Construction Manager: EDIS/CRSS, 1530 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22209, 703-528-1300

~"'i:w®~f"~ffllJ:lll!l!~

-l!liGroundbreaking: December 1990
Finish date: October 1992
Construction time: 22 months

Total: $3.0,000,000
Building only: $26,200,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $19,000,000
Housing per inmate: $39,583
Housing per cell: $79,167
Total per inmate: $62,500
TotalperGSF: $150
Total per NSF: $188.00
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

-Structural: Cast-in-place and precast cell,
wall and floor panels
Exterior walls: Precast panels, CMU block,
glass block, metal panel
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Precast concrete,
CMUblock
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
smveillance, staff intercommunication,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels

82

Total GSF: 200,000
Total NSF: 160,000
Corrections GSF: 200,000
Corrections NSF: 160,000
Housing area GSF: 100,000
Housing area NSF: 72,000
GSFper inmate (design): 417
GSFper inmate (cwrent): 858
NSF per inmate (design): 333
NSF per inmate (cwrent): 687
Size of cells: 73 (double)
Net/gross square feet: 80%

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Remote and manual
locking
Floor surface: Epoxy
Intercom: Unknown
HYAC: Forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel, plastic, wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Security

General popuJation
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 480
Donns:O
Special popu1ation
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 480
Cwrentpopulation:Februruy1993:938

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, video camera smveillance; costs
excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium: 100%
Minimum:0

~r-,-~,
B~-- ~\.- -. ,:)
f

illi\,_, I!\@;\;;;;,

•

• :W.. C

~/.~

M

'si\t' •

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 30
Inmates per unit (design): 60
Inmates per unit (cwrent): 60
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
pennanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: Limited; precast
components, furniture
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast
concrete

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 15
Security: 257
Programs and treatment: 5
Maintenance: 6
Total:278
Cwrent inmate/staff ratio: 3.4:1
Contracted services: Medical, substance
abuse treatment, special programs
:e£WJ&]t

~

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); less expensive materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials
Negative: N/A

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Delaware
Wilmington

!

I

~-~-

"•

~o

..I
D,I

t

..I
D,I

:z:.

i,c
N
N

D,I

:Ii!

..I

w

1;i

..I

z

<
::E

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

83

Brevard County Detention Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Brevard County

Contact: Commander Harry Sands, Jail Administrator, Brevard County Detention Center, P.O. Box 800, Sharpes, FL 32959-0800,
407-690--1503
Architect: Rosser Justice Systems, 524 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30308, 404-876-3800
Construction Manager: N/A

~{111![••11&~~~2--

Total GSF: 204,000
Total NSF: 127,000
Corrections GSF: 204,000
Corrections NSF: 127,000
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 520
GSFper inmate (current): 315
NSF per inmate (design): 324
NSF per inmate (current): 196
Size of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet: 62%

111.1. .tll:41,~--~,~WIIII~

Groundbreaking: March 1985
Finish date: March 1987
Construction time: 24 months

Total: $18,000,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $8,000,000
Housing per inmate: $20,408
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $45,918
Total per GSF: $88.24
Total per NSF: $141.73
Total annual operating costs: $10,331,215

Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame, load-bearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
-Exterior stuface or facade: EIFS
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels, perimeter
detection/alarm, satellite/cable, metal
detection, watch tower system

84

General population
Single occupancy: 392
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Total design: 392
Current population: December 1991 : 647

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 96
Inmates per unit (design): 96
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intennittent
and remote surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Mattresses on
floor
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

~··~

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor stuface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm, general paging
HVAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat, forced
air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter
detection/alarm; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 17%
Medium: 83%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: 199
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.3: 1
Contracted services: Medical

lfllllll,411111111i1Jil
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods, less
expensive materials
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Florida
Brevard County

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

85

Genesis Unit 200 Bed Correctional Facility
Responsible official: Director, Corrections Division, Orange County

Contact: Richard Anderson, Facility Manager, Genesis Unit 220 Bed Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 4970, Orlando, fl. 32802,
407-836--3289
Architect: Hansen Lind Meyer, 800 North Magnolia Avenue, #1100, Orlando, FL 32803, 407-422-7061
Construction Manager: Jack Jennings and Sons, 1030 Wilfred Drive, Orlando, fl., 32803, 407--896--8181

Groundbreaking: October 1987
Finish date: June 1988
Construction time: 8 months

Total: $2,999,000
Building only: $2,906,985
Final construction cost: Same
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $11,715
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $1,925,693

Structural: Steel frame, precast concrete
frame
Exterior walls: CMU block, reinforced and
grouted
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior sUiface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels,
satellite/cable

86

Total GSF: Unknown
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: Unknown
Corrections NSF: Unknown
HousingareaGSF: 42,014
Housing area NSF: 36,255
GSF per inmate (design): Unknown
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor sUiface: Carpet, vinyl tile
Intercom: N/A
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Wood, vinyVplastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common areas
Windows: Standard and bars

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 200
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 200
Current population: January 1993: 215

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, razor wire on fence(s); costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium: 100%
Minimum:0

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): 55
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day: l
Evening: 1
Midnight 1

Contract method: Construction manager
withGMP
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 2
Security: 43
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 0
Total:45
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4.8: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track);
compactness of the building footprint
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); advanced
order of materials; coordination of design
Negative: NIA

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Florida
Orange County

_j

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

87

Hillsborough County Orient Road Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Hillsborough County

Contact: David M Parrish, Colonel, Department Commander, Hillsborough County Jail Central, 1201 Orient Road, Tampa, FL 33619,
813--247--8310
Architect: Ranon & Partners, fuc., Architects, 511 Bay Street, Tampa, FL 33606, 813--253--3465
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 636,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 636,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 386,000
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 368
GSF per inmate (current}: 407
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 70 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: November 1987
Finish date: June 1990
Construction time: 30 months

Total: $62,900,000
Building only: $61,000,000
Final construction cost: Same
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $36,400
Total per GSF: $98.90
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $25,679,000

=•mmm

®'Fa
Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels, CMU block,
brick
futerior walls: CMU block
Exterior smface or facade: Brick, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door control/monitoring

88

General population
Single occupancy: 1,330
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 174
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Total design: 1,504
Current population: April 1992: 1,542

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 192
fumates per unit (design): 192
fumates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current}: Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:7
Evening:?
Midnight: 7

-

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast cell
chases

Door material(s): Wood, hollow steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor smface: Carpet, vinyl tile, rubber tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Forced air, ice thermal storage
system
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Fumiture:Wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Horizontal slit and special
security

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: Unknown
Medium: Unknown
Minimum: Unknown

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 120
Security: 350
Programs and treatment: 65
Maintenance: 40
Total:575
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.7: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, less expensive materials
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time; difficult site conditions;
complex electronic, mechanical, and
electrical systems; limited staging area
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Florida
Hillsborough County

c:::J
0

D
DD

------------ --

-G' ol

t:Po
tJ

..

□

-

--------

oOo
D

·,_

-· o ~
D
□Q□

IP
0

.

.

::J ~

[](I RI
-r-----~---~- ------'

:

-----------

I
I

----

-----------------

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

89

James I. Montgomery Correctional Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Duval County

Contact: Thomas H. Bobbitt, Chief, James I. Montgomery Correctional Center, 4727 Lannie Road, Jacksonville, FL 32218, 904-766-5010
Architect: Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc., 2502 Rocky Point Road, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 32202, 813-281--0533
Construction Manager: TheHaskellCompany,P.O. Box44100,Jacksonville,FL32231, 904-791-4500

IL~t:~,3~-

Total GSF: 54,586
Total NSF: 43,670
Corrections GSF: 54,586
Corrections NSF: 43,670
Housing area GSF: 40,964
Housing area NSF: 35,416
GSF per inmate (design): 124
GSF per inmate (current): 280
NSF per inmate (design): 99
NSF per inmate (current): 224
Siz.e of cells: 4,345 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 80%

1~fiJi~'7i~ifflWF~n!Wii15~Hilli~
ti:;twdffi~~~lw~~W.a,w_m~~rn~

Groundbreaking:June1989
Finish date: September 1989
Construction time: 4 months

Total: $4,300,000
Building only: $4,042,000
Final construction cost: Same
Housing area: $2,910,000
Housing per inmate: $6,736
Housing per cell: $363,750
Total per inmate: $9,773
Total per GSF: $78.77
Total per NSF: $98.47
Total annual operating costs: $9,297,300

Structural: Precast concrete cells
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Stucco
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, staff intercommunication, door
controVmonitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:432
Special population
Single occupancy: 8
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 440
Current population: December 1991: 195

llllillllllraat111i111

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): 216
Inmates per unit (current): 25
Management type (design): Remote
sUIVeillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day: 3
Evening: 3
Midnight: 3

Contract method: Turnkey design-build
Finance method: Tax-exempt loan
Use of inmate labor: Limited; general
cleanup
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; precast
units

90

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Hoor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter. Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s); costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium: 100%
Minimum:O

illllllf.illillllllllltl!I
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 24
Security: 105
Programs and treatment: 9
Maintenance: 5
Total: 147
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.3: l
Contracted services: Food

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track)
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track)
Negative: N/A

NJJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Florida
Duval County

I

11

II

1!
Ii

l.

11

I~□ 0

_l

0

□

□ all □
I

1□ □ I □
D

·□

6
- _.._

D

i□

D
I-□~
0

D

Li

i

.

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

91

John E. Goode Pre-Trial Detention Facility
Responsible official: Sheriff, Duval County

Contact: Michael A. Berg, Deputy Director, John E. Goode Pre-Trial Detention Facility, 500 East Adams Street, Jacksonville,
H., 32202-1680, 904--630-2120
Architect: Sverdrup Corporation, 1650 Prudential Drive, Suite 200, Jacksonville, H., 32207, 904-399--8300
Construction Manager: Barton-:Malow/Tompkins-Beckwith, 2055 Wood Street, Suitel04, Sarasota, H., 34237, 813--957-3770

Total GSF: 629,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 480,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 453,000
Housing area NSF: 331,000
GSF per inmate (design): 209
GSF per inmate (current): 291
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 90 (double), 7,055 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

.....-~•.,••

~

Groundbreaking: June 1988
Finish date: April 1991
Construction time: 34 months

Total: $62,700,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost Higher
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: NIA
Total per GSF: $99.68
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $34,500,000

■BlliWIIIBl:4&11•■~snuctural: C.ast-in-place concrete frame,
precast concrete frame and cells
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block, coated insulated wall
system
Interior walls: Precast panels; cast-in-place
concrete; CMU block; precast modular cell
components, columns, beams, and hollowcore planks
Exterior surlace or facade: Stucco, natural wall,
textured and colored concrete, CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff intercommunication, inmate intercom, paging and
sound system, duress/fire alann, door control
and monitoring, card access, custom control
panels, pneumatic control system

92

General popu1ation
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 1,808
Donns:66
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 121
Donns:6
Total design: 2,297
Current population: July 1992: 1,652

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls;
modular/pod
Cells per unit Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:5
Evening: 5
Midnight 4

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Extensive; precast
columns and beams, hollow-core floor slab,
concrete cell and mechanical chase modules

Door material(s): Steel, glass
Type(s) of doors: Swinging, sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking, manual locking
Floor smface: Carpet, epoxy coating, sealed
concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Includes air-conditioning, heating
and air circulation, forced air, and coil airhandling units
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china, stainless
steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic, concrete
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Security and screens

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance
Inmate security level
Maximum: 16%
Medium:64%
Minimum: 10%
Holding and first appearance housing: 10%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 100
Security: 323
Programs and treatment: 22
Maintenance: 4
Total:449
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.7:1
Contracted services: Medical, food
a~~I'~'imi~T~!i
~~~
lb~Jffi
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Includes prefabricated components,
phased construction
Negative: High labor costs, difficult site
conditions, gov. procedures and regulations
Factors affecting time schedu1e
Positive: Prefabricated components, phased
construction, coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, gov. procedures and
regulations

NIJ/NationalDirectory of Corrections Construction

~

~

~
....

5·

-~-

E
~

/

(':>

~

/

~

Q

'·,

::i

u

"'

~

,·
'...

/

.I'

OUTOOM il,CTl\llfV

> '

//

~

-'·.V ~
,I.
•,,

"'

~

.,
"'

.

,::J

a
§.

.,

'•

.

~--~~LL~
';. ~
ctU..
;.,",,

•

•

C')

g.

au.

'147

0,1r,YA001,11
l~d

WALE

~

~CN

·•,1

r,i.

h

CEU.

I!

Cl~

I

ul

4TH FLOOR PLAN
4

r- ,•. u·

32·

0
~~
< e:..0

\0

vJ

n "1
0
§
Q.·

~

=

Martin Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Contact: Richard Kirkland, Superintendent, Martin Correctional Institution, 1150 SW., Allapttah Road, Indiantown, H.. 34956--4397,
407-597-3705
Architect: Rosser White Hobbs Davidson McClellan Kelly Inc., P.O. Box 2343, Savannah, GA 31402, 706--876--3800
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 265,028
Total NSF: 261,521
Corrections GSF: 265,028
Corrections NSF: 261,521
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFper inmate (design): 445
GSFperinmate(cwrent): 241
NSF per inmate (design): 439
NSF per inmate (current): 238
Size of cells: 70 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 99%

llmitlJ11IRlll!J11illJ~tiitli:

Groru1dbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: June 1985
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $23,601,642
Building only: $22,916,012
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $22,916,012
Housing per inmate: $51,152
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $39,600
Total per GSF: $89.05
Total per NSF: $90.25
Total annual operating costs: $18,497,819

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMU block, stucco
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior surface or facade: Stucco
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, staff intercommunication,
paging and soru1d system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels, perimeter detection/alarm

94

General population
Single occupancy: 448
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 148
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 596
Current population: February 1993: 1,099

IIIIIB[:ll&lll]lititllilll
Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 112
Inmates per unit (design): 112
Inmates per unit (cwrent): 224
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance
Management type (cwrent): Intermittent
surveillance and remote surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, second bunk permanently
attached
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: I

Contract method: Turnkey design-build
Finance method: State general revenue
Use of inmate labor: Limited; general labor
helpers
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging, sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking, motor
driven and remote locking
Floor surface: Lino/sheet vinyl, carpet,
epoxy coating, sealed concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Air-conditioning, heating/air
circulation, solar heat, steam heat, gas heat
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china, stainless
steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Special security and screens

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), motion detectors on
roof; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:0
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Food

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Phased construction (fast track)
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Phased construction (fast track)
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Florida
Indiantown

----.. ·-------......... ...

..-·-·-·-·-·-·-·

......

_

·,

,·!
i
i
i
i
i
i
i

!
~

!
!
!
~

!

i!
·•••••••••••OToOO

SITE PLAN
1.

2.
3.
4.

5.
6,

7.
8.
9.

10.
1t

HOUSING UNITS
HOUSING SUPPORT BUILDING
FOOD SERVICE
FUTURE EXPANSION
INMATE ACTIVITIES
MAINTENANCE
WAREHOUSE
MULTI-SERVICES
VISITOR AND CONTROL
ADMINISTRATION
GENERATOR

......__,ao

D

10

•••I

2DG

..........,IJCAli

HOUSING- FIRST FLOOR

t

SALLYPORT
CONTROL ROOM

2.
3.

OAYROOM

4.
5.
6.

TYPICAL CELL

LINEN STORAGE
MULTI-PURPOSE

a

11

1i,

20

~

,.
I

G,uJJttlC $CALE.

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

95

Metro West Detention Center
Responsible official: Director, Dade County Department of Corrections

Contact: Guy Evans, Captain, Facility Supervisor, Metro West Detention Center, 13850 NW. 41st Street, Miami, FL 33192, 305-597-2620
Architect: Eddie Frances, A.I.A, 1385 Coral Way, Suite 204, Miami, FL 33145, 305-854-4070
Construction Manager: NIA

'

."
"'

Total GSF: 177,000
Total NSF: 123,900
Corrections GSF: 177,000
Corrections NSF: 123,900
Housing area GSF: 116,820
Housing area NSF: 123,900
GSFperinmate(design): 176
GSF per inmate (current): 186
NSF per inmate (design): 123
NSFperinmate(current): 130
Siz.e of cells: 4,500 (donn)
Net/gross square feet: 70%

Groundbreaking: April 1991
Finish date: January 1992
Construction time: 8 months

Total: $15,200,000
Building only: $15,200,000
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $15,190,520
Housing per inmate: $15,823
Housing per cell: N/A
Total per inmate: 15,139
Total per GSF: 85.88
Total per NSF: 122.68
Total annual operating costs: $41,650,000

-~ilr--Structural: Precast concrete frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMUblock
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior surface or facade: Stucco, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels, perimeter
detection/alarm, satellite/cable, touch
screen integrated security system

96

-

·-··

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:960
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 42
Dorms:0
Total design: 1,004
Currentpopulation:June 1992:950

"'lllll"W"
'&W!l''&ITMPJllff'~riii!lil"'
r~~:
~~filhiR~Jrnffi

"'i&i[&llf!iii
•

C

':

_,

~~lift

- -

½ ,~3:m -~
,-;.,,-~%iw.R1~~~iw~i@ffe.'lt

Design: Mooular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 60
Inmates per unit (current): 60
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day: I
Evening: I
Midnight: 1

Contract methoo: Turnkey design-build
Finance methoo: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

=· _

~,:;filllt1@f2::l/lfuWMT ~' .. -

,'CIB'~ , ~~-- ---=

' - (f~~~~;m;;,,;,=, '
-~-~K~~~..-RW:>i::w.~

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Carpet, sealed concrete, vinyl
tile, quany tile
lntercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Other energy recycle unit, elecnical
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Wooo, vinyVplastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas
Windows: Slit, special security, standard

Perimeter: Building exterior only, double
fence, perimeter patrols and detection/
alarm, razor wire on fence(s), video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:4%
Medium:96%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 9
Security: 245
Programs and treatment: 23
Maintenance: 7
Total:284
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.5:1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); gooo
competition; less expensive materials
Negative: Government procedures/
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and elecnical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials;
coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, government procedures/
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and elecnical systems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Florida
Dade County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NJJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

97

Palm Beach County Stockade
Responsible official: Sheriff, Pahn Beach County

Contact: Major Reynolds, Facility Administrator, Palm Beach Coilllty Stockade, 673 West FairgroW1ds Road, P.O. Box 85, Loxahatchee,
FL 33409, 407--688-4807
Architect: Rosser Justice Systems, 524 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30308, 404-876-3800
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 80,000
Total NSF: 54,000
Corrections GSF: 80,000
Corrections NSF: 54,000
Housing area GSF: 80,000
Housing area NSF: 54,000
GSFperinmate (design): 277
GSFperinmate (current): 313
NSF per inmate (design): 187
NSF per inmate (current): 211
Size of cells: 80 (single), 85 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 68%
r11~ifif',ffl'i~At~&'w!r'ruillfill¾1*

~~~~!£!fillffittr•
GroWldbreaking: May 1991
Finish date: July 1992
Construction time: 14 months

Total: $8,800,000
Building only: $8,700,000
Final construction cost Higher
Housing area: $3,700,000
Housing per inmate: 14,453
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: 30,450
Total per GSF: 110.00
Total per NSF: 163.00
Total annual operating costs: $14,987,825

Structural: Steel frame, modular metal cells,
CMU load-bearing walls
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV SLU"Veillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate inten:om,
paging and soWld system, duress/fire
alann, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels, satellite/cable, metal
detection

98

General popu1ation
Single occupancy: 16
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:240
Special popu1ation
Single occupancy: 13
Double occupancy: 20
Dorms:O
Total design: 289
Current population: January 1993: 256

l0

•m:a,

r@i~il'i::3.~'i@.=}®3,;.;.,;:m..r,

Design: Modular/pod, dormitory
Cells per unit: Unknown
fumates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, mattresses on floor

Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 3
Midnight: 3
-

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate laoor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete, vinyl tile
Inten:om: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm, watch tower system,
metal detectors
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire between
fence(s); costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:6%
Medium:0
Minimum: 94%

LIi.=
..'llll.·c%!!!L~~~aL.
.'~
.. .
fus....
;.... ~~~~~
<>.

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods, less ·
expensive materials
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
advanced order of materials
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplie½govemmentprocedures
and regulations

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

FOURTH AND FIFTH FLOOR/TYPICAL HOUSING UNIT

'-0

\CJ

1. SALLY PORT
2. TYPICAL INMATE HOUSING
3.SHOWER
4. INDOOR RECREATION
MULTI-PURPOSE
5. OUTDOOR RECREATION
6. ELECTRICAL ROOM

7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

EXAM
TREATMENT
BARBER
DAYROOM
TYPICAL INMATE ROOM
STORAGE/MECHANICAL

Pinellas County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Bureau of Detention and Correction, Pinellas County

Contact: Major H.B. Wilber, Pinellas County Jail Maximum Security Unit, 14400 49th Street North, Cleaiwater, FL 34622, 813--530--6415
Architect: Watson and Company (out ofbusiness)
Construction Manager: Federal Construction Company, 1355 Snell Isle Boulevard NE., St Petersburg, FL 33704, 813--821--8000

,,,.,'F,- "~-~~ ,":' ci;¥{,:.
•
,.....,.....,..~y-~.....;;:i::~&-°~..:.@'TJffif.Wcra:'..lc,7 ,~ ,.c m~ ~'~.

lllm-ll_Wjj;~~~ili?,fz:

.

•

Tot.al GSF: 118,844
Total NSF: 89,133
Corrections GSF: 118,844
Corrections NSF: 89,133
Housing area GSF: 85,248
Housing area NSF: 59,674
GSF per inmate (design): 309
GSF per inmate (current): 340
NSF per inmate (design): 225
NSF per inmate (current): 255
Size of cells: 94 (double)
Net/gross square feet: 75%

111,J
Groundbreaking: December 1985
Finish date: March 1988
Construction time: 27 months

Tot.al: $12,450,000
Building only: $12,450,000
Final construction cost: Same
Housing area: $9,160,000
Housing per inmate: $23,854
Housing per cell: $47,708
Tot.al per inmate: $31,439
Tot.alperGSF: $104.76
Tot.al per NSF: $139.68
Tot.al annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Precast concrete frame, precast
concrete cells
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Stucco
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, duress/fire alarm,
door controVmonitoring, custom control
panels, satellite/cable

100

~=;;~

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 384
Dorms: 0
Special population
Single occupancy: 12
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 396
Current population: April 1993: 350

Design: Unknown
Cells per unit: 8
Inmates per unit (design): 16
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Beds in
dayroom
Total officers per unit
Day: 23
Evening: 20
Midnight: 21

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: No intercom system
HVAC: Steam heat, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Single fence, double fence, razor
wire on fence(s), towers, perimeter patrols
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:0
Minimum:0

l /........
_' .
. ,--"-'·.,-'■ili' '!lB
..
.

-, _

~ ,

~~Y~'F
JW
-

,

ii~Tim.
r-m i:w!
....~,~

Full-time equivalent

Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treannent: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Tot.al: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Ad valorem funds, budget
allocation
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Florida
Pinellas County

NIJ/National D~rectory of Corrections Construction

101

Central Correctional Institute
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Thomas C. Jones, Warden, Central Correctional Institute, 4600 Fulton Mill Road, Macon, GA 31213, 912-471-2909
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 22,575
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 22,575
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 16,870
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate (design): 113
GSFperinmate(current): 127
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 3,600 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking:April 1989
Finish date: September 1989
Conslruction time: 5 months

Total: $2,000,000
Building only: $2,000,000
Final conslruction cost Lower
Housing area: $1,625,000
Housing per inmate: $8,125
Housing per cell: $406,250
Total per inmate: $10,000
Total per GSF: $88.59
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior smface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:200
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 200
Current population: June 1992: 178

illl&iBllllilll■lllll.l
Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): 44
Management type (design): Remote
sUIVeillance
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day:7
Evening: 6
Midnight: 5

_..ltiltl
Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; preengineered structure

102

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor smface: Vinyl tile
fu.tercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

lll

ltt!111l■ftlii1

Full-time equivalent

Administration: 5
Security: 50
Programs and treatment: 6
Maintenance: 1
Total: 62
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2. 9: 1
Contracted services: NIA

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); good competition; less
expensive materials
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials;
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Macon

0

>-+--+---

...J...---F'.::~~.u...-,.._;=c'll----1-7,

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

103

Central Probation Detention Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Ross T. Gearinger, Superintendent, Central Disnict Probation Detention Center, Railroad Street, P.O. Box 190, Cadwell, GA
31009,912-689-4750

Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 31,642
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 3 I ,642
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 205
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,220 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Standard

General population
Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: August 1990
Construction time: 12 months

Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 152

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0

Total: $2,250,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $950,000
Housing per inmate: $6,250
Housing per cell: $237,500
Total per inmate: $14,610
Total per GSF: $71.11
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

illllllll,1Jllilflllllll
Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door control/
monitoring

104

Dmrns:O
Total design: 154
Current population: Unknown

Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 38
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight Unknown

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

-

Factors affecting construction costs

Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and elecnical systems

Factors affecting time schedule
Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Cadwell

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

105

Clayton County Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Commission Chairman, Clayton County

Contact: Mickey Camp, Warden, Clayton County Correctional Institution, 12010 Hastings Bridge Road, Lovejoy, GA 30250,
706-473-5777
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 33,500
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 33,500
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: I8,700
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 540
GSF per inmate (current): 168
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 1,813 (donn)
Nel/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: January 1991
Finish date: March 1992
Construction time: 14 months

Total: $2,300,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $1,200,000
Housing per inmate: $21,428
Housing per cell: $300,000
Total per inmate: $8,664
Total per GSF: $67.76
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $1,899,500

Structural:Steelfrarne
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior smface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:246
Special population
Single occupancy: 6
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 252
Current population: June 1992: 200

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): 50
Management type (design): Remote
sUNeillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
and remote surveillance
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor smface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:O
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 5
Security: 40
Programs and treatment: 1
Maintenance: 0
Total:46
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4.3: 1
Contracted services: NIA

lllllllllllllllr._..
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: NIA
Negative: NIA

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

106

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Clayton County

r---------,

NJJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

107

Coastal Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Patrick Donaldson, Warden, Coastal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 7150, Garden City, GA 31048-7150, 912-964--9330
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 22,575
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 22,575
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 16,870
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFper inmate (design): 113
GSFperinmate (current): 113
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 3,600 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

111!!1111Bllilllll1■

Groundbreaking: April 1989
Finish date: August 1989
Construction time: 5 months

Total: $2,030,000
Building only: $2,000,000
Final construction cost Unknown
Housing area: $1,625,000
Housing per inmate: $8,125
Housing per cell: $406,250
Total per inmate: $10,150
Total perGSF: $89.92
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $13,500,000

Structural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, dmess/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:200
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 200
Current population: July 1992: 200

Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit 1
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): 50
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Direct
supeivision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:5
Evening: 4
Midnight: 3

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; preengineered structure

108

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire between
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 0
Security: 25
Programs and treatment 4
Maintenance: 1
Total: 30
Current inmate/staff ratio: 6.7: 1
Contracted seivices: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); good competition; less
expensive materials
Negative: NIA
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
cons1ruction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials;
coordination of design
Negative: NIA

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Garden City

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

109

Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, P.O. Box 3877, Jackson, GA 30233, 706--775-3161
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 22,575
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 22,575
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 16,870
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 113
GSFperinmate (current): 113
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 3,600 (donn)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Standard

IIJllllil:~~~ir~
lil§"@lli5lfill"'!W:@1

-

1liillffl1•r1!!lll!l&mi
®ffl_@ :l~lt&$ill$;

Groundbreaking:April1989
Finish date: September 1989
Construction time: 5 months

Total: $2,108,944
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $1,625,000
Housing per inmate: $8,125
Housing per cell: NIA
Total per inmate: $10,545
Total per GSF: $93.42
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:200
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Total design: 200
Current population: July 1992: 200

Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): 50
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Mattresses on
floor
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; preengineered structure

110

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 0
Security: 28
Programs and treatment: 6
Maintenance: 0
Total:34
Current inmate/staff ratio: 5.9: 1
Contracted services: Medical, nursing and
physician assistants only

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); good competition; less
expensive materials
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricatro components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials;
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Jackson

-1-'

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

111

Georgia Women's Correctional Institute
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Mary Esposita, Warden, Georgia Women's Correctional Institute, P.O. Box 218, Hardwick, GA 31034, 912-453-5218
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 22,575
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 22,575
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 16,870
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate (design): 113
GSFperinmate (current): 31
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 3,600 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

-

Groundbreaking:Aprill989
Finish date: September 1989
Construction time: 5 months

Total: $2,030,000
Building only: $2,000,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $1,625,000
Housing per inmate: $8,125
Housing per cell: $406,250
Total per inmate: $10,150
Total per GSF: $89.92
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:200
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 200
Current population: April 1993: 722

--

Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Direct ·
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; preengineered structure

112

Doorrnaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for dorms and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs included

Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

~~.~ffe?~L~[
-~~~=~E~t¥lm!,.dl
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 5
Security: 202
Programs and treatment: 24
Maintenance: 3
Total:234
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.1: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); good competition; less
expensive materials
Negative: N/A

Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials;
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Hardwick

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

113

Glynn County Detention Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Glynn County

Contact: Ronald Corbett, Jail Administrator, Glynn County Detention Center, 1812 Newcastle Street, Brunswick, GA 31520,
912-267-5664Architect: Hansen Lind Meyer, 800 North Magnolia Avenue, Suite 1100, Orlando, FL 32803, 407-422-7061
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 86,413
Total NSF: 69,133
Corrections GSF: 86,413
Corrections NSF: 69,133
Housing area GSF: 33,017
Housing area NSF: 23,584
GSFperinmate (design): 302
GSFper inmate (current): 384
NSF per inmate (design): 242
NSF per inmate (current): 307
Size of cells: 96 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: 80%
~~illW®&'.¥1®¥~'¥'
,_

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: April 1989
Construction time: 18 months

Total: $9,171,160
Building only: $8,761,158
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $3,730,000
Housing per inmate: $13,815
Housing per cell: $21,686
Total per inmate: $32,067
TotalperGSF: $106.13
Total per NSF: $132.66
Total annual operating costs: $2,332,902

-Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing
masonary
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMUblock
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication. inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels

114

~~~---~~~-

General population
Single occupancy: 74
Double occupancy: 196
Dorms:O
Special popuJation
Single occupancy: 16
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 286
Current population: September 1992: 225

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Sliding, motor driven and
remote locking, manual locking
Floor surface: Carpet, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells, audio sound
threshold
HVAC: Steam heat
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china, stainless
steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security and fixed

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 15%
Medium:55%
Minimum: 30%

,·
:w
;,·

,,

,ffiWllii1',

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 31
Inmates per unit (design): 64
Inmates per unit (current): 56
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day: I
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method Local special, time-limited
tax levy
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

~
0

"

=-,:

~

.

· , , - ......
, · ,1rn--1
f®· ·, .. ,L~W"3&~'
WJM~ ,.,,

,

>:<

JM!WcW',m,~

· ·.

hlTuHt~g@mwrrni

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 8
Security: 57
Programs and treatment: 1
Maintenance: 1
Total: 67
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.4:1
Contracted services: Medical, food
' , . " '" lkffl.~
,,

.

'°''!L!I

·' ''',fdffe

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Labor problems; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Glynn County

z

<(
_,J

a..

a:
i!

i~

0
0

..J

LL

Ien

a:

u:::

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

115

Hays Correctional Institute-Bootcamp
Responsible official: Commisioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: John Crawford, Unit Manager, Hays Correctional Institute-Bootcamp, P.O. Box 668, Trion, GA 30753, 706--857-7489
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 157,450
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 157,450
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 13,780
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate (design): 703
GSF per inmate (current): 2,624
NSFperinmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,808 (donn)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: June 1991
Finish date: October 1992
Construction time: 12 months

Total: $5,000,000
Building only: $4,700,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $4,600,000
Housing per inmate: $20,536
Housing per cell: $1,150,000
Total per inmate: $22,321
Total per GSF: $31.76
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
Exterior surface or facade: Natural wall
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 224
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 224
Current population: January 1993: 600

·••1111111Qa11,111,~1~~,1
Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 56
Inmates per unit (current): 48
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day: 3
Evening: 3
Midnight: 2

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track), inmate construction
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: Extensive; everything
except structure
Use of prefabrication: Extensive;
preengineered structure

116

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: One-way to cells and common
areas
HYAC: Heating/air circulation only
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

tlBlllllllllttlllJlltlllll
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 5
Security: 21
Programs and treatment: 10
Maintenance: 1
Total: 37
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.6: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, less expensive
materials
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Labor problems, government
procedures and regulations, inmate labor

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Trion

UPPER 1.EVE1. PLAN

IT:::::]
a::::::]

i;::::::::JJ

a:::::::J

i;::::II

II:=,]

c::IJ

Cil[IC]
c:I) IT::::]

C]J

c:Il

ffl
F~:='.J~~
~~
c:::]J

i:c.:::l

C]Jrr=J
C]JII=::J

r::3J a:::::i
c=Il IJi:::=:J
c:Il [L)

[=rl

i::::::::Il
c::Il

c::Il
c::Il
c:::]J

r::3J

UPPER LEVa PlAN

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

117

Henry County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Henry County

Contact: Gregory Pope, Major, Herny County Jail, 120 Herny Parlcway, McDonough, GA 30253, 706-954--2236
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: BLI Construction, 3384 Peachtree Road, Suite 713, Atlanta, GA 30326, 706-261-4053

Total GSF: 55,591
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 36,881
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 23,147
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 300
GSF per inmate (current): 505
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 100 (double), 2,300 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

fillillllliRlll!lfllr■i~
Groundbreaking: August 1990
Finish date: February 1992
· Construction time: 19 months

Total: $5,600,000
Building only: $5,340,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $2,818,000
Housing per inmate: $16,576
Housing per cell: $33,153
Total per inmate: $32,941
Total per GSF: $100.74
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $3,348,342

Structural: Load-bearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior smface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, custom
control panels

118

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 72
Dorms: 88
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 10
Dorms:4
Total design: 170
Current population: October 1992: 110

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intennittent
and remote surveillance
Means to handle crowding: NJA
Total officers per unit
Day:N/A
Evening: N/A
Midnight: N/A

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Local special, time-limited
tax levy
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor smface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells,
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s); costs included

Inmate security level
Maximum: 48%
Medium:38%
Minimum: 14%

iltlll11Bllllftlillllllll
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 3
Security: 40
Programs and treatment: 3
Maintenance: 0
Total: 46
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.4: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

lfitriiE~tciiJll-lii
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Coordination of design
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Henry County

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

119

Homerville Parole Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Jeny Lightsey, Superintendent, Homerville Parole Center, 700 Reddick Road, Homerville, GA 31634, 912-487-3244
Architect: 1PG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 15,745
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 15,745
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 13,780
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 70
GSF per inmate (current): 157
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,808 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Groundbreaking: June 1991
Finish date: May 1992
Cons1ruction time: 12 months

Total: $500,000
Building only: $470,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $460,000
Housing per inmate: $2,054
Housing per cell: $115,000
Total per inmate: $2,232
Total per GSF: $31.76
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $2,636,940

S1ructural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
Exterior surlace or facade: Natural wall
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:224
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0

• Perimeter: Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Dorms:O
Total design: 224
Current population: July 1993: 100

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: I
Inmates per unit (design): 56
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 3
Midnight 3

-

Contract method: Inmate construction
Finance method: State general obligation
lxmds
Use of inmate labor: Extensive; everything
except structure
Use of prefabrication: Limited; preengineered structure

120

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
. Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surlace: Sealed concrete
Intercom: One-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation only
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard and bars

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 19
Security: 40
Programs and treatment: 10
Maintenance: 2
Total:71
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.4: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, less expensive
materials
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Labor problems, government
procedures and regulations

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Homerville

UPPER u:vEl.. PINI

IT:::::]
a::::::]

CL:]

a=:J
[C]

CC]
a::::]

C[l(lC]

i;::::::JJ a:::]

c:::Il~
"'tir
C-::I][C]

-

mil

:;::_.J.l[L~
~CC]

e31rv::-·J

~[C.:::;J

r:inrr=J

CI) [C]

CI)[C]

CJ]IT:::::]

CIJ.
CY]

L~
[-=::]]

~

CI]

C3]

ffl
C]J[IC]
Cl][IC]

C]J a::::J

C[l
C]J
C]J

c::]J

[CJ

r:::::Il [EJ
r:::::Il crc::i

[CJ

CJ] a;::::::]

C]J
C]J

c::::::::iD

UPPER L£V8. PIM

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

121

I. W. Davis Probation Detention Center
Responsible official: Commisioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Come Byrd, Director, I.W. Davis Probation Detention Center, Box 250, County Farm Road, P.O. Box 730, Jefferson, GA 30549,
706-367-1732
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 Noq:h Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 31,642
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 31,642
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 205
GSF per inmate (current): 911
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,220 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

lllll:4111iflliillllilll

Groundbreaking: June 1987
Finish date: January 1990
Construction time: 19 months

Total: $2,313,255
Building only: $2,313,255
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $950,000
Housing per inmate: $6,250
Housing per cell: $237,500
Total per inmate: $15,021
TotalperGSF: $73.10
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $1,758,718

[dllllll
Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: CMU block
futerior walls: CMU block
Exterior stuface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Doubleoccupancy:0
Dorms: 152
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Total design: 154
Current population: March 1993: 166

~'i!&Mfik*~-'

;,: · ·•· ··
ID •. "
. "
.. . · · .. ..,,," . . ~·.-·-,,@¥~@
~ c / 4 . tJk~~ ~"'~~Lm ~~;:;t.~·~fil~&~)Jfil
-

Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 38
Inmates per unit (current): 41
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day: 18
Evening: 7
:Midnight: 6

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

122

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Remote locking only
Floor stuface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:o·
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 8
Security: 31
Programs and treatment: 6
Maintenance: 5
Total:50
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.3: 1
Contracted services: N/A

fllJJIIBII
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Jefferson

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

123

Lowndes County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Lowndes County

Contact: G. Robert Carter, Sheriff, Lowndes County Jail, 111 Roswell Drive, Valdosta, GA 31601, 912-333--5149
Architect: IPG, fuc., 2722North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: Alcon Associates, fuc., 201 Baldwin Drive, Albany, GA 31707, 912-432-7411

Total GSF: 56,200
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 49,500
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 42,788
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate(design): 151
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 90 (double), 420 (donn)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: June 1992
Construction time: 24 months

Total; $5,819,000
Building only: $5,670,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $4,655,000
Housing per inmate: $14,192
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $17,905
Total per GSF: $103.54
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

llflllillllillllllll411

Structural: Precast concrete slabs on CMUblock-bearing walls and steel framing
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMU block, EIFS
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, C:MU block
Exterior swface or facade: CMU block.
EIFS

Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring

124

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 80
Donns:240
Special population
Single occupancy: 4
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:4
Total design: 328
Current population: Unknown

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
fumates per unit (design): 8
fumates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

-~~~~-Jif-~711
~~~~~~~~k§thY~-~,~

Contract method: Multiple bid packages not
fast track
Finance method: Local special, time-limited
tax levy
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormateiial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor swface: Sealed concrete
futercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation only, gas
heat
Plumbing; Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit, special security

Perimeter: Double fence, razor wire on
fence(s); costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 25%
Medium:75%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods, less
expensive materials
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Lowndes County

--L....>==-Uu
D:U;.nt,i,•..-W

(N,i,lm'),.._

"l!lll'f' A.!.lffiO:I lliOMIO"i

IBJJ

NII/National Directory of Corrections Construction

125

Northeast Probation Detention Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Johnie M. Gannon, Superintendent, Northeast Probation Detention Center, 797 Beasley Street, Blairsville, GA 30512,
706-745-3610
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: Bowen & Watson, Highway17 South, P.O. Box 877, Toccoa, GA 30577, 404-886-3197

Total GSF: 31,642
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 31,642
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 205
GSF per inmate (current): 191
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,220 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: June 1988
Finish date: J1U1e 1989
Construction time: 12 months

Total: $2,100,000
Building only: $2,100,000
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $950,000
Housing per inmate: $6,250
Housing per cell: $237,500
Total per inmate: $13,636
Total per GSF: $66.37
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $1,675,135

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: C:MU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 152
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Total design: 154
Current population: October 1992: 166

Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 38
Inmates per unit (current): 42
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Early release

Total officers per unit
Day:4
Evening:4
Midnight:4

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

126

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum:100%

rlllil!IBll!!ltillllBflllll

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 8
Security: 33
Programs and treatment: 6
Maintenance: 5
Total:52
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.2: 1
Contracted services: NIA

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Blairsville

:::J

18 -- .

lsI
:!M

•

Is

B

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

127

Northwest Probation Detention Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Jim Deal, Superintendent, Northwest Probation Detention Center, 1030 West Girard Avenue, Cedartown, GA 30125,
706--749-2300

Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, P.O. Box 2007, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 31,642
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 31,642
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 12,024
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 205
GSFperinmate (current): 191
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 96 (single), 2,200 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

~~~~General population

~~

Groundbreaking:Septemberl989
Finish date: August 1990
Construction time: 12 months

Total: $2,250,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $950,000
Housing per inmate: $6,250
Housing per cell: $237,500
Total per inmate: $14,610
Total per GSF: $71. I 1
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $1,918,998

Structural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
futerior walls: CMU block
Exterior sutface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door control/
monitoring

Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 152
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 154
Current population: January 1993: 166

Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 38
fumates per unit (current): 42
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:5
Evening: 3
Midnight:5

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor swface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Standard

~~-···
~~~~w

,

,

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:O
Minimum: 100%

foot~

Full-time equivalent

Administration: 8
Security: 28
Programs and treatment: 12
Maintenance: 1
Total:49
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.4: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

Contract method: Conventional design-bid.build
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

128

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Cedartown

NIJJNational Directory of Corrections Construction

129

Phillips Correctional Institute-Bootcamp
Responsible official: Commisioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Rick Abbott, Warden, Phillips Correctional Institute-Bootcamp, 2989 West Rock Quarry Road, Buford, GA 30518,
706-932-4500
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602-2007, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 15,745
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 15,745
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 13,780
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 70
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Siz.e of cells: 2,808 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

ff"'iV~~~~~~~,--

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflock.s: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: One-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation only
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard and bars

~iffl~~~~@$:WillW£I@IDi--wli'mi!

111111111111··.; ~ ·I!i
. ·1m·i··mi·ll~
-· ·ruw·

~

.

' ~

Groundbreaking: June 1991
Finish date: May 1992
Construction time: 12 months

Total: $500,000
Building only: $470,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $460,000
Housing per inmate: $2,054
Housing per cell: $115,000
Total per inmate: $2,232
TotalperGSF: $31.76
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

-~.-···
.... Eli

Structural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
Exterior surface or facade: Natural wall
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring

General popuJation
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:224
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 224
Current population: Unknown

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included

Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%
~~1@~~~

~-~-.~~

~~~,.-81i~
Hffiii[ffl"!:fiiB~J&mmHr"'fil'~■~•

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 56
Inmates per unit (current): 50
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

'

WN~~~#.ffl~~
~-mt~~~~

,Wif'.:zjj:~'"'/W

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track), inmate construction
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: Extensive; everything
except structure
Use of prefabrication: Limited; preengineered structure

130

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 100
Security: 319
Programs and treatment 0
Maintenance: 14
Total:433
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.8:1
Contracted services: Unknown

~~~~

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, less expensive
materials
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Labor problems, government
procedures and regulations, inmate labor

NII/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Buford

UPPER L.EVa. PL!!!:!

IT::::J
a:::::::::;iC:Yla:::::::]
CL:]
;,_::::JJ[C~

C]JQCJ

C]J IT:::]

ffl

lr=:l
a:::::J

r::::::::::zoa:::::J

Cil[CJ

CrJ

(_~cc:)

CIJ[CJ

Cil

c:JJa:::::J

Cil [CJ

r:::::]]

a:::::J

[CJ

UPPER

LEVEL

AM

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

131

Rockdale-Dekalb Probation Detention Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Arnold DePetro, Superintendent, Rockdale-Dekalb Probation Detention Center, 2165 Chambers Drive, Conyers, GA 30207,
706--388--5777
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: MG Engineering and Construction, 200 West Park Drive, Suite 300, Peachtree City, GA 30269, 404-487--0343

,.

· > -...

Total GSF: 31,642
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 31,642
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate (design): 205
GSF per inmate (current): 191
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,220 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: Unknown
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $2,250,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $950,000
Housing per inmate: $6,250
Housing per cell: $237,500
Total per inmate: $14,610
Total per GSF: $71.11
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $1,688,030

BJJ11111JJBi&lllll•lB

Structural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 152
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
DOimS: 0
Total design: 154
Current population: July 1992: 166

Design: Dormitory
Cells per ooit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 38
Inmates per unit (current): 41
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Waiting list
and early releases
Total officers per unit
Day:9
Evening: 8
Midnight: 5

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HYAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

-

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:O
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 11
Security: 36
Programs and treatment: 8
Maintenance: 1
Total:56
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
gocxl competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

132

NIJ/NationalDirectory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Conyers

U!

=i

IU

ill-·

•
111
1

!K
i

•

fs

~

NJJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

133

Rogers Correctional Institute
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Jackie Trim, Warden, Rogers Correctional Institute, Star Route, Box 5300, Reidsville, GA 30453, 912-557-4771
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 22,575
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 22,575
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 16,870
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 113
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 3,600 (donn)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

lillllf!r!IVAll-ifil11
General population
Groundbreaking: April 1989
Finish date: September 1989
Construction time: 5 months

Total: $2,030,000
Building only: $2,000,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $1,625,000
Housing per inmate: $8,125
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $10,150
Total perGSF: $89.92
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

llllililllllliwll•~J!II

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring

134

Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 200
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 200
Current population: Unknown

1111111111111111111111!4
Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit: I
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
swveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited;
preengineered structure

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HYAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for dorms and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:O
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

-~~~:&
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); good competition
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials
Negative: N/A

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Reidsville

--r--'

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

135

Southeast Probation Detention Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Robert E. Williams, Superintendent, Southeast DisnictProbation Detention Center, U.S. Highway 301 North, P.O. Box 869,

Claxton, GA 30417, 912-739-1911
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: Music and Worth Construction, Route 6, Box 499, Live Oak, FL 32060, 904-658-1598

Total GSF: 31,642 ·
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 31,642
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 205
GSFperinmate(current): 191
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,220 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: July 1988
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $2,250,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost Unknown
Housing area: $950,000
Housing per inmate: $6,250
Housing per cell: $237,500
Total per inmate: $14,610
TotalperGSF: $71.11
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior smface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 152
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 154
Current population: November 1992: 166

Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit 1
Inmates per unit (design): 38
Inmates per unit (current): 38
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight 1

-

-

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: Limited
Use of prefabrication: None

136

Door rnaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Epoxy coating, vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included

Inmate security level
Maximum: 0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

-

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 13
Security: 29
Programs and treatment: 6
Maintenance: 1
Total:49
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.4: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

'=,g
.. :lill
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and elecnical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and elecnical systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Claxton

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

137

Telfair Correctional Institute-Bootcamp
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: David Thompson, Warden, Telfair Correctional Institute-Bootcamp, P.O. Box 549, Longbridge Road, Helena, GA 31037,
912--868-7721
Architect: IPG, fuc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta. GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 15,745
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 15,745
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 13,780
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 70
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,808 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking:June1991
Finish date: May 1992
Construction time: 11 months

Total: $500,000
Building only: $470,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $460,000
Housing per inmate: $2,054
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $2,232
Total per GSF: $31.76
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Steel frame
.Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
Exterior surface or facade: Natural wall
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring

138

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 224
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 224
Current population: Unknown

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit 1
fumates per unit (design): 56
fumates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

-

Contract method: fumate construction
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: Extensive; Everything
except the structure
Use of prefabrication: Limited; preengineered structure

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
futercom: One-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation only
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for dorms and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included

Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Mediwn:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration:Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

-

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, less expensive
materials
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Labor problems, government
procedures and regulations, inmate labor

N/J!National Directory of Corrrctions Construction

Georgia
Helena

UPPER LEVEL Pl$!

CJ]

a::::::]

cr::::J
rr:=:;i

er:~

CI} i:r:::]

~rr=:I

L

~

C]][E:;J

er::=]

-

.

~CC]

C]J[["-•:i

~i:::c:]

c::::Il i::r=J

Cil[C]

c=]J[C]

CJ] [C]

CI]~

CI] a::::::i

~

[I=:]

C=:Tirr::J
DJ
:.._ .-11.l a::__.1
L~
lllll
~=:]]

~

CI]

CID

F~:='.j'S b-_d

~~

Cl..JLl_J

C]J

c::ilJ

c·.1J IJLJ

CTI
CI]IJLJ

UPPER LEVEL Pl.NI

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

139

Treutlen Shock Unit
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Jim Combs, Warden, Treutlen Shock Unit, P.O. Box 747 Session Street, Soperton, GA 30457, 912-529--6760
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 47;267
Total NSF: 38,625
Corrections GSF: 47,267
Corrections NSF: 38,625
Housing area GSF: 17,500
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 204
GSF per inmate (current): 283
NSF per inmate (design): 166
NSF per inmate (current): 231
Size of cells: 2,262 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 82%

llllf'Alillllltlll■I■

Groundbreaking: November 1989
Finish date: March 1991
Construction time: 17 months

Total: $3,400,000
Building only: $3, 190,880
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $1,265,000
Housing per inmate: $5,548
Housing per cell: $210,833
Total per inmate: $14,655
Total per GSF: $71.93
Total per NSF: $88.03
Total annual operating costs: $2,915,349

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Doubleoccupancy:0
Donns:228
Special population
Single occupancy: 4
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 232
Current population: June 1992: 167

lllill■I

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 38
Inmates per unit (current): 38
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day:5
Evening: 8
Midnight:4

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
INAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included

Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 9
Security: 49
Programs and treatment 9
Maintenance: 3
Total: 70
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.4: I
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition, less expensive
materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

140

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Soperton

,

,

,:: ::

~

::·~

d

~;;,:,tn"

- - - - .. - - ..

~

t:
g

~ "'
"'
di "'
~

@.

(2l,

,~

1~
1~

~~
I·

~

©
©
di

©.

~

(I)

1~

1~

dl
di
©

✓

✓

/

cg
@£

l1Afl
~

©

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

.

b

I

'lo

'

~

141

U.S. Federal Penitentiary-Atlanta
Responsible official: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Contact: Fred Stock, Warden, U.S. Federal Penitentiary-Atlanta, 601 McDonough Boulevard SE., Atlanta, GA 30315, 404--622--6241
Architect: Rosser Justice Systems, 524 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30308, 404-876-3800
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 134,000
Total NSF: 70,000
Corrections GSF: 134,000
Corrections NSF: 70,000
Housing area GSF: 134,000
Housing area NSF: 70,000
GSFperinmate (design): 315
GSF per imnate (cunent): 71
NSF per inmate (design): 164
NSF per inmate (current): 37
Size of cells: 80 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 52%

Groundbreaking: November 1986
Finish date: August 1990
Construction time: 45 months

Total: $9,600,000
Building only: $9,600,000
Final construction cost Same
Housing area: $9,600,000
Housing per inmate: $22,535
Housing per cell: $22,535
Total per inmate: $22,535
Total per GSF: $71.64
Total per NSF: $137.14
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

-

Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMUblock
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior swface or facade: Natural wall,
stone
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels, metal
detection

142

General popu1ation
Single occupancy: 426
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:O
Total design: 426
Current population: February 1993: 1,895

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 224
Inmates per unit (design): 224
Inmates per unit (current): 288
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells, transfer to another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:6
Evening: 6
Midnight: 1

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm, general paging
throughout
HVAC: Air-conditioning, steam heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Towers; costs excluded

Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium: 100%
Minimum:O
y"' ' ~ - , "'~,
K •. .
-

1~·m
C

., •

~m,~'WA,Tu=~~
•

'!&1h11:~,:.;

Full~time equivalent
Administration: 50
Security: 200
Programs and treatment 85
Maintenance: 39
Total:374
Current inmate/staff ratio: 5.1: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Atlanta

C

IV
D..

a,

·-~ -~
C

========-,-:::::==

~-t:,

0

CU

-~

:l

J: -I
-ra -c
C

~

e

F- Cl
NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

143

Ware Correctional Institute
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Doug Williams, Warden, Ware Correctional Institute, 3620 North Harris Road, Waycross, GA 31501, 912-285-6400
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 22,575
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 22,575
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 16,870
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 113
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Sire of cells: 3,600 (donn)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: April 1989
Finish date: September 1989
Construction time: 5 months

Total: $2,030,000
Building only: $2,000,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $1,625,000
Housing per inmate: $8,125
Housing per cell: $406,250
Total per inmate: $10,150
Total per GSF: $89.92
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door control/
monitoring

144

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorrns:200
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 200
Current population: Unknown

Design: Donnitory
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight Unknown

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; preengineered structure

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for dorms and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs included

Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration:Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown
ii< 'f~~:::-,_,:" ···cc,;
~~~.,

·-~~

~'7" -~~'

;;;,,,E, ._.

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); good competition; less
expensive materials
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials;
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Waycross

NII/National Directory of Corrections Construction

145

Washington Correctional Institution-Boot Camp
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Rose Renfroe, Warden, Washington Correctional Instirution-Boot Camp, P.O. Box 206, Davisboro, GA'31018,
912-348-5814
Architect: IPG, fuc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 15,745
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 15,745
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 13,780
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 70
GSF per inmate (current): 48
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,808 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

-

Groundbreaking: June 1991
Finish date: May 1992
Construction time: 12 months

Total: $500,000
Building only: $470,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $460,000
Housing per inmate: $2,054
Housing per cell: $115,000
Total per inmate: $2,232
Total perGSF: $31.76
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $9,999,000

-

Structural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
futerior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
Exterior surface or facade: Natural wall
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:224
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0

Perimeter: Single fence; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Donns:O
Total design: 224
Onrentpopulation: October 1992: 327

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 56
Inmates per unit (current): 96
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

-

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track), inmate construction
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: Extensive; everything
except structure
Use of prefabrication: Limited; preengineered structure

146

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
·
futercom: One-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation only
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard and bars

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 15
Security: 88
Programs and treatment: 5 I
Maintenance: 9
Total: 163
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, less expensive
materials
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Labor problems, government
procedures and regulations

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Davisboro

.,..,. 1110CM

·am

UPPER l.£VEl. Pl.AH

[IC]
[lC]

CC]

c:::IJcc:]
r.=:[]1I:::=:J.

[['.:::]

QC.1
[C]
[C]

rv::--::

"'--.YI-'---"'"

~

C]J~

~-"-!!-'---"'"

c:::IJ II::]

C]]

CI]~

C]J

C]J [Cj

C]J[Cj

Cil

CIJ[C::J

C]J[LJ

CJ] a:::::)

CI)[Cj

~

c:::IJ er::]

i:t:=J

ffl

~
;:::=..~

~

F-·ds~
~~
CI::)

[C'l

C]J

C]J
~

r::Il a:::::)

CI)[LJ
C]J [Cj

C]J
C]J
C]J

.. ··..
UPPER L£YEL Pl.AN

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

147

Washington Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Chuck Burden, Warden, Washington Correctional Institution P.O. Box 206, Davisboro, GA 31018, 912-348-5814
Architect: Rosser Justice Systems, 524 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30308, 404-876-3800
Constructjon Manager: N/A

lla~-~~~~21t!Total GSF: 227,000
Total NSF: 148,000
Corrections GSF: 227,000
Corrections NSF: 148,000
Housing area GSF: 123,000
Housing area NSF: 80,000
GSF per inmate (design): 334
GSF per inmate (current): 694
NSF per inmate (design): 218
NSF per inmate (current): 452
Size of cells: 80 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: 65%

lll!l!Dlll!IIIRllii&i:tilll
Groundbreaking: July 1989
Finish date: August 1991
Construction time: 25 months

Total: $18,500,000
Building only: $17,500,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $10,500,000
Housing per inmate: $15,441
Housing per cell: $21,875
Total per inmate: $27,206
Total per GSF: $81.50
Total per NSF: $125
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

~11tllllJlii~JllllllilJJ

Structural: Steel frame, precast concrete
cells, load-bearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block, precast cells
Exterior swface or facade: CMU block,
EIFS
Electronic teclmology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels, satellite/
cable, watch tower system, metal detection

148

General population
Single occupancy: 284
Double occupancy: 392
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 4
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 680
Current population: October 1992: 327

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor swface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm, general paging
throughout
HVAC: Heating/air circulation only, gas
heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Operable slit (one light fixed,
one light operable)

Perimeter: Double fence, razor wire on
fence(s); costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
.
Medium: 100%
Minimum:0

f
l w ~ - ~. .,,mwJH@-Will&ilY.~~I
-~~,·--·~m~~@~,:s~,J~m,m;
Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Unknown
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

filll!i9Jlf~lil!llm111

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Extensive

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

BJIIBllil\111111111!111
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods, less
expensive materials
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components,
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Davisboro

'-.

',_

..•

' .: ~

··-·- ·- ·-·-·-·------•--••-•

- - --- - -----

.' .

,

-

~

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

149

West Central Probation Detention Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Nathaniel Ray, Superintendent, West Central District Probation Detention Center, P.O. Box 589, Zebulon, GA 30295,
706-567--0631
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: Reddick Construction Company, 605 East Main Street, P.O. Box 1029, Thomaston, GA 30286

Total GSF: 31,642
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 31,642
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 205
GSFper inmate (current): 196
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,220 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: Unknown
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $2,250,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $950,000
Housing per inmate: $6,250
Housing per cell: $237,500
Total per inmate: $14,610
Total per GSF: $71.11
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $1,643,465

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 152
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 154
Currentpopulation:JanuaI)'1993: 161

Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 38
Inmates per unit (current): 40
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Admissions
control
Total officers per unit
Day: 10
Evening: 8
Midnight: 6

B::~IillilllL~~~IIIJ

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter. Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 6
Security: 32
Programs and treatment: 10
Maintenance: 1
Total:49
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.3: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

150

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Zebulon

-~
=i

Ill

18 -·
I

111

I

!11
I

•

111

~

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

151

Western Probation Detention Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Lee Oxford, Superintendent, Western Probation Detention Center, 1019 Billy Boulevard, P.O. Box 2259, Butler, GA 31006,
912--862-5851
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912-242-3557
Construction Manager: N/A

Groundbreaking:June1987
Finish date: September 1989
Construction time: 27 months

Total: $2,250,000
Building only: $750,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $950,000
Housing per inmate: $6,250
Housing per cell: $237,500
Total per inmate: $14,610
Total per GSF: $71.11
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $1,724,568

Structural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door control/
monitoring

Total GSF: 31,642
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 31,642
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 205
GSF per inmate (current): 301
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 2,220 (donn)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s)of locks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel.
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Standard

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 152
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Doubleoccupancy:0
Dorms:0
Total design: 154
Current population: January 1992: 105

Perimeter: Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

-Design: Donnitory
Cells per unit 1
fumates per unit (design): 38
Inmates per unit (current): 26
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (cmrent): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:5
Evening: 5
Midnight: 3

----

-Full-dme equivalent
Administration: 6
Security: 33
Programs and treatment: 6
Maintenance: 6
Total:51
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.1: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

152

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Butler

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

153

Women's Probation Detention Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Contact: Glenn R. Rich, Superintendent, Women's Probation Detention Center, Highway 301 North, P.O. Box 920, Claxton, GA 30417,
912-739--0716
Architect: IPG, Inc., 2722 North Oak Street, Valdosta, GA 31602, 912--242-3557
Construction Manager: Pages, Inc., 410 McIntosh Street, P.O. Box 1240, Vidalia, GA 30474, 912-537-2264

Total GSF: 31,642
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 31,642
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 8,880
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 209
GSFperinmate(current): 191
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Siz.e of cells: 2,220 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknmvn

Groundbreaking: November 1990
Finish date: November 1991
Construction time: 12 months

Total: $2,750,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $950,000
Housing per inmate: $6,250
Housing per cell: $237,500
Total per inmate: $17,857
Total per GSF: $86.91
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 152
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 154
Current population: March 1993: 166

ll!lfl,aaa118]f11fltt411
Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit 1
Inmates per unit (design): 38
Inmates per unit (current): 42
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
and remote surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Population cap
Total officers per unit
Day:4
Evening:4
Midnight:4

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation

Door material(s): Steel

Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor swface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HYAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter. Single fence; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 19
Security: 32
Programs and treatment 4
Maintenance: 1
Total:56
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3: 1
Contracted services: Medical, food

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
· Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

bonds

Use of inmate laoor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

154

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Georgia
Claxton

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

155

.Danville Correctional Center
Responsible official: Director, Illinois Department of Corrections

Contact: George E. DeTella, Warden, Danville Correctional Center, P.O. Box 4001, Danville, Il..,61834--4001, 217---446--0441
Architect: BLDD Architects, 100 Merchant Street, Suite 200, Decatur, Il., 62523, 217-429-5105
Construction Manager: Illinois Department of Corrections, Capital Programs Unit, 1301 Concordia Court, P.O. Box 19277, Springfield, Il.,
62794-9277,217-522-2666

Total GSF: 369,506
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 369,506
CorrectionsNSF:Unknown
Housing area GSF: 88,953
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 399
GSF per inmate (current): 216
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 60 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

!!'mli&Ii1lw!lstWmi~~

~Tu,,1! tlil.&o~Jm~

Groundbreaking: April 1983
Finish date: July 1985
Conslruction time: 27 months ·

Total: $40,500,000
Building only: $34,500,000
Final conslruetion cost Lower
Housing area: $14,000,000
Housing per inmate: $15,625
Housing per cell: $15,625
Total per inmate: $43,736
Tot.i.I per GSF: $109.60
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $17,076,480

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame, load-bearing masonry
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
Interior walls: C:MU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels, perimeter detection/alarm,
satellite/cable

156

General population
Single occupancy: 8%
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 30
Doubleoccupancy:0
Dorms:0
Total design: 926
Current population: January 1993: 1,712

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 56
Inmates per unit (design): 56
Inmates per unit (current): 112
Management type (design): Intermittent and
remote surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 3
Midnight 3

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, hot water
Plumbing: Stainless steel
.Furniture: Steel, wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas
Windows: Standard and bars, security
screens

-

Perimeter. Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:3%
Medium:97%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 29
Security: 257
Programs and treatment 74
Maintenance: 13
Total:373
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4.6: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: NIA

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Illinois
Danville

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

157

Hill Correctional Center
Responsible official: Director, Illinois Department of Corrections

Contact: Jerry D. Gihnore, Warden, Hill Correctional Center, 600 Linwood Road, P.O. Box 1327, Galesburg, IL 61401, 309-343-4212
Architect: BLDD Architects, 100 Merchant Street, Suite 200, Decatur, IL 62523, 217-429-5105 .
Construction Manager: Illinois Department of Corrections, Capital Programs Unit, 1301 Concordia Court, P.O. Box 19277, Springfield, IL
62794-9277,217-522-2666

L....~.~
Total GSF: 380,907
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 380,907
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 88,594
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFper inmate (design): 411
GSFper inmate (current): 236
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 60 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

llilllfill~ll[8lllllfl
Groundbreaking: October 1984
Finish date: August 1986
Construction time: 22 months

Total: $38,500,000
Building only: $32,500,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $16,000,000
Housing per inmate: $17,857
Housing per cell: $17,857
Total per inmate: $41,577
Total perGSF: $101.07
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $16,666,700

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame, load-bearing masonry
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, custom
control panels, perimeter detection/alarm,
satellite/cable

158

General population
Single occupancy: 896
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O

Special population
Single occupancy: 30
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0

Total design: 926
Current population: January 1993: 1,617

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 56
Inmates per unit (design): 56
Inmates per unit (current): 112
Management type (design): Intermittent and
remote surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 3
Midnight: 2

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm
HV AC: Heating/air circulation, gas heat,
forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel, wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:3%
Medium:97%
Minimum:O

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 85
Security: 227
Programs and treatment: 20
Maintenance: 11
Total: 343
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4.7: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: N/A

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Illinois
Galesburg

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

159

Illinois River Correctional Center
Responsible official: Director, Illinois Department of Corrections

Contact: Rodney Ahitow, Warden, Illinois River Correctional Center, P.O. Box 999, Canton, IL 61520, 309-647-7030
Architect: BLDD, lOOMerchantStreet, Suite 200, Decatur, IL62523, 217-429-5105
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 351,901
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 351,901
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 70,875
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 432
GSFper inmate (cwrent): 272
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (cwrent): Unknown
Size of cells: 60 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: April 1988
Finish date: October 1989
Construction time: 18 months

Total: $44,000,000
Building only: $33,000,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $13,370,000
Housing per inmate: $18,365
Housing per cell: $18,365
Total per inmate: $54,054
TotalperGSF: $125.04
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $15,103,700

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame, cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door control/monitoring, custom
control panels, perimeter detection/alann,
satellite/cable

General population
Single occupancy: 728
Double occupancy: 0
Dorrns:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 86
Double occupancy: 0
Dorrns:O
Total design: 814
· Cwrentpopulation: April 1992: 1,295

Design: Linear
Cells per unit: 56
Inmates per unit (design): 56
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Jntennittent and
remote surveillance
Management type (cwrent): Intennittent
and remote surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cell
Total officers per unit
Day:4
Evening: 4
Midnight: 3

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Epoxy coating
Intercom: One-way to common areas,
inmate duress alann
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, gas heat,
forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel, wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas
Windows: Standard and bars, security
screens

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alann, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 13%
Mediwn: 87%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 30
Security: 265
Programs and treatment: 56
Maintenance: 32
Total: 413
Cwrent inmate/staff ratio: 3.1: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations

bonds

Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

160

NJJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Illinois
Canton

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

161

McHenry County Government Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, McHeruy County

Contact: John E. Harrison, Administrator, McHemy County Government Center, 220 North Seminary Avenue, Woodstock, IL 60098,
815-338-2144
Architect: Legat Architects, 24 North Chapel Street, Waukegan, IL 60085, 708--662-3535
Construction Manager: N/A

.

Total GSF: 204,200
Total NSF: 140,900
Corrections GSF: 78,000
Corrections NSF: 54,600
Housing area GSF: 48,352
Housing area NSF: 29,300
GSF per inmate (design): 392
GSF per inmate (current): 765
NSF per inmate (design): 274
NSF per inmate (current): 535
Size of cells: 74 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: 69%

Groundbreaking: July 1990
Finish date: May 1992
Construction time: 21 months

Total: $30,600,000
Building only: $29,300,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $7,090,000
Housing per inmate: $38,533
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $149.85
Total per NSF: $217.18
Total annual operating costs: $2,826,551

.....

~

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMU block, brick
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block, steel wall panels
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door conttoV
monitoring, custom control panels,
satellite/cable

162

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Epoxy coating
Intercom: Two-way to cells
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations, smoke evacuation
system
Windows: Special security

General popuJation
Single occupancy: 120
Double occupancy: 64
Dorms:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 5
Double occupancy: 10
Donns: 0
Total design: 199
Current population: June 1992: 102

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 20%
Medium: 80%
Minimum:O

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 16
Inmates per unit (design): 16
Inmates per unit (current): 16
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
permanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

•!lfil;k-,

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild, multiple bid packages (fast track)
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; steel wall
panels for plumbing chases

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 6
Security: 86
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 2
Total: 94
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.1: 1
Contracted services: Medical, food

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, good competition,
complete and accurate construction
documents
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction meth~, good onsite project
management
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, labor problems.weather
problems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Illinois
McHenry County

Housing Unit Floor Plan
0
B
16
32 Feel
~

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

163

Robert H. Babcox Justice Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Lake County

Contact: Lawrence C. Lesza, Director of Corrections, Robert H. Babcox Justice Center, 20 South County Street, Waukegan, 1L 60085,
708-360--5760
Architect: Legat Architects, 24 North Chapel Street, Waukegan, 1L 60085, 708--662-3535
Construction Manager: N/A

~~~I~~~~~
Total GSF: 265,008
Total NSF: 253,008
Corrections GSF: 155,598
Corrections NSF: 150,598
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 223
GSF per inmate (current): 358
NSF per inmate (design): 216
NSF per inmate (current): 346
Size of cells: 70.5 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: 95%

m-

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking, manual locking
Floor surface: Epoxy coating, vinyl tile
futercom: Two-way to cells
HYAC: Gas heat, forced air.
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china, stainless
steel combination unit
Furniture: Unknown
Fire protection: Smoke evacuation plan
Windows: Special security

~
__-~™'ifi.i,\t1mW~~mm_.
·~_fi'~"'"=-=:4"""'

■-~,~•~~•~•Jk!IIM
"=_

Groundbreaking: November 1986
Finish date: Unknown
Construction time: 24 months

Total: $30,832,691
Building only: $30,332,000
Final construction cost Higher
Housing area: $22,199,538
Housing per inmate: $46,249
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: NIA
Total per GSF: $116.35
Total per NSF: $121.86
Total annual operating costs: $5,076,959

111111Dlllitllllllt:6t&
Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block, brick
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring, custom control panels,
satellite/cable

164

General population
Single occupancy: 240
Double occupancy: 240
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 22
Double occupancy: 4
Dorms: 192
Total design: 698
Current population: June 1992: 435

Design: Modular/pod; linear cells on inside
Cells per unit: 24
Inmates per unit (design): 24
Inmates per unit (current): 24
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, portable 40-bed unit

Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

-

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild, multiple bid packages (fast track)
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 16%
Medium:54%
Minimum: 30%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 9
. Security: 109
Programs and treatment: 7
Maintenance: 2
Total: 127
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.4: 1
Contracted services: Medical, programs

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
advancedorderofmaterials,coordination
of design
Negative: Weather problems; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Illinois
Lake County

~
__J

=-

=
=
=

__J

'-'I--

c..n
=
=

g-

=
=

2=.LL..J

:;2
LL..J
__J

~

==

§

D

D

◊

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

◊

165

Robinson Correctional Center
Responsible official: Director, Illinois Department of Corrections

Contact: Mary Hardy-Hall, Warden, Robinson Correctional Center, P.O. Box 1000, Robinson, IL62454, 618-546-5659
Architect: Phillip Swager Associates, 3622 North Knoxville Avenue, Peoria, IL 61603, 309-688-9511
Construction Manager: N/A

. '~it" ,

'·······=

Total GSF: 204,000
Total NSF: 164,000
Corrections GSF: 204,000
Corrections NSF: 164,000
Housing areaGSF: 79,5%
Housing area NSF: 64,000
GSF per inmate (design): 332
GSF per inmate (current): 211
NSF per inmate (design): 267
NSF per inmate (current): 170
Siz.e of cells: 544 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 80%

lllllllli:t11111flwlllft
Groundbreaking: October 1989
Finish date: January 1991
Construction time: 15 months

Total: $24,600,000
Building only: $12,525,000
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $5,280,000
Housing per inmate: $8,800
Housing per cell: $88,000
Total per inmate: $40,065
TotalperGSF: $120.59
Total per NSF: $150.00
Total annual operating costs: $12,932,500

Structural: Preengineered buildings
Exterior walls: CMU block. brick, metal
panel
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, metal
panel
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, duress/fire alarm,
door controVmonitoring, custom control
panels

166

General pojm]ation
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:600
Special population
Single occupancy: 10
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:4
Total design: 614
Current population: March 1993: 967

lllllll!IB9Brlfltlt1lll1
Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 10
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Intennittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells

Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; rigid
frame preengineered structure and siding

Door material(s): Hollow metal
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: No intercom system
HVAC: Air-conditioning, forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
Dorms and common areas, sprinklers for
common areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Fixed

Perimeter: Double fence, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers, perimeter
patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 1%
Medium:0
Minimum: 99%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 26
Security: 219
Programs and treatment: 21
Maintenance: 7
Total:275
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.5: I
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, phased
construction (fast track), coordination of
design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplie½governmentprocedures
and regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Illinois
Robinson

. . . . II

■ ..... -

•

■ -

•• -

■ " -

•• -

•• -

• - -

-

■ -

■ - -

•• -

•• -

■ • -

... -

■

BUILDING FUNCTIONS

A OUTSIDE ADMIN,
RECEPTION/GATE HOUSE
SECURITY CONTROL
ROLL CALL
B

MEDICAL
SECURITY ADMIN.
SEGREGATION

C

COMM ISARY
NEW ADMISSIONS
LAUNDRY
INSIDE YARD MAINT.

0

DINING/FOOD SERVICE

E

EDUCATION
ACADEMIC
VOCATIONAL

F

FIRING RANGE

STO!il'I WATER

DETENTION POND

G .GREENHOUSE
H VEHICLE SALLYPORT
GUARDHOUSE
L

REC YARD TOILET

M

MUL TIPUPOSE
INDOOR REC/GYM
SECURITY ADMIN.
VISITING

p

REC YARD SHELTERS

R

RESIDENCE HOUSING

T

PERIMETER TOWERS

T

J

l
/
/

/

RADIO TOWER

V VEHICLE MAINT.
INSTITUTIONAL MAINT.
INSTITUTlONAL STORAGE

w

1

<------ ◄

FOOD SERVICE
WAREHOUSE

\

\

\

\,

0

WATER TOWER

--·

■

-

-■- ■

·-·· -

■ ■-. ■-,--··

-··-··-·. -·· -

NII/National Directory of Corrections Construction

■

--· -

~

167

Taylorville Correctional Center
Responsible official: Director, Illinois Depanment of Corrections

Contact: Michael Fu:rrie, Warden, Taylorville Correctional Center, P.O. Box 1000, Taylorville, IL 62568, 217--824--4004 ·
Architect: Phillip Swager Associates, 3622 North Knoxville Avenue, Peoria, IL 61603, 309--688--9511
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 204,000
Total NSF: 164,000
Corrections GSF: Unknown
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 79,596
Housing area NSF: 64,000
GSFperinmate (design): Unknown
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 544 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 80%

-

Groundbreaking: November 1989
Finish date: December 1990
Construction time: 13 months

Total: $24,600,000
Building only: $12,525,000
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $5,280,000
Housing per inmate: $8,800
Housing per cell: $88,00)
Total per inmate: $40,065
Total per GSF: $120.60
Total per NSF: $150
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

llillliilllll\11111111

Structural: Preengineered
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick, metal
panel
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior smface or facade: Brick, metal
panel
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, duress/fire alarm,
door control/monitoring, custom control
panels

168

Genera] population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:600
Special population
Single occupancy: 10
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:4
Total design: 614
Current population: Unknown
*

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 10
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
TotaJ officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; rigid
frame preengineered, structure and siding

Door material(s): Hollow metal
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floorsmface:Vinyltile
Intercom: No intercom system
HYAC: Air-conditioning, forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for donns
and common areas, sprinklers for common
areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Fixed

Perimeter: Double fence, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers, perimeter
patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 1%
Medium:0
Minimum: 99%

-

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition
Negative: Slow consttuction and lengthy
building time; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, phased
construction (fast track), coordination of
design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier; government procedures
and regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Illinois
Taylorville

■

,.. •

-

•

■

-

•

■

-

•

■

-

• • -

•

■

-

• • -

11111

■

-

■ ■

-

Ill ■

■ ■

-

-

■

.. -

•

■

-

•

■

-

a a -

,1111

■

BUILDING FUNCTIONS
A tl.lTSIDE AOMIN.
RECEPTION/GATE HOUSE
SECURITY CONTRCl.

ROLL CILL

B IEDICAL
SEClRITY AOMIN.

SEGREGATION

C COt-ttISARY
NEW AOMISSittlS

LAUNDRY

INSIDE YARD HAINT,

D DINING/FOO) SERVICE
E EDUCATION
ACADEMIC
VOCATIONAL
F FIRING RANGE

G GREEtfflUSE
H VEHICLE SALLYPORT
GlJARDHOOSE

L REC YARD TOILET
M Mil.TIPlJlOSE
\

INDIXIR REC/GYM
SEMITY ACHIN.
VISITING

, RADIO TOWER
►-------­
/

I

P REC YARD S1£LTERS

I
I

R RESIDENCE HOUSING

I

.!

T PERIMETER TOWERS
V VEHICLE MAINT.

INSTlTUTIONAL MAINT.

INSTITUTIONAL STORAGf

II

FOOD SERVICE

WAREHOUSE

.

·/ •

STORM WATER
RETENTION POND
LOCATION

1•• - •• ...,,. •

•

/

••

■

~1

L .. - .... - .. - .. -· . - .. - .. -.:

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

169

Western Illinois Correctional Center
Responsible official: Director, Illinois Department of Corrections

Contact: William D. O'Sullivan. Warden, Western Illinois Correctional Center, P.O. Box 1000, Mt Sterling, IL 62353, 217-773--4441
Architect: Bradley, Likins, Dillow, Drayton, 100 Merchant Street, #200, Decatur, IL 62523, 217--429-5105
Construction Manager: Illinois Department of Corrections, Capital Programs Unit, 1301 Concordia Court, P.O. Box 19277,
Springfield, IL 62794--9277, 217-522-2666

Total GSF: 336,891
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 336,891
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 70,875
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFper inmate (design): 444
GSF per inmate (current): 263
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 60 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: October 1987
Finish date: April 1989
Construction time: 18 months

Total: $39,500,000
Building only: $33,000,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $13,370,000
Housing per inmate: $18,365
Housing per cell: $18,365
Total per inmate: $52,111
Total per GSF: $117 .25
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $16,589,000

~Strucrural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame, cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Brick
futerior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, custom
control panels, perimeter detection/alarm,
satellite/cable

170

-

General population
Single occupancy: 728
Doubleoccupancy:0
Donns:O

Special population
Single occupancy: 30
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Total design: 758
Current population: April 1993: 1,282

-

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit 224
hunates per unit (design): 224
fumates per unit (current): 403
Management type (design): Intermittent and
remote surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight Unknown

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor swface: Epoxy coating
Intercom: One-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, gas heat,
forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel, wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas
Windows: Standard and bars, security
screens

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers; costs included
hnnate security level
Maximum:4%
Medium:96%
Minimum:0

FuIUime equivalent
Administration: 29
Security: 249
Programs and treatment: 31
Maintenance: 13
Total: 322
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

--

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Illinois
Mt. Sterling

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

171

Will County Adult Detention Facility
Responsible official: Sheriff, Will County

Contact: Martin Nowak, Warden, Will County Adult Detention Facility, 95 South Chicago Street. Joliet. IL 60436, 815-740-5526
Architect: Phillips Swager Associates, 3622 North Knoxville Avenue, Peoria, IL 61603, 309-688-9511
Construction Manager: CRSS Constructors, Inc., 216 16th Street. Suite 1700, Denver, CO 80202, 303--820--5200

Total GSF: 154,562
Total NSF: 96,600
Corrections GSF: 154,562
Corrections NSF: 96,600
Housing area GSF: 103,825
Housing area NSF: 62,295
GSF per inmate (design): 489
GSF per inmate (current): 706
NSF per inmate (design): 306
NSF per inmate (current): 441
Size of cells: 72 (single), 630 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 63%

Groundbreaking:Septemberl987
Finish date: March 1990
Construction time: 28 months

Total: $22,900,000
Building only: $19,900,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $72,468
Total per GSF: $148.16
Total per NSF: $237 .06
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing
masomy
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block, gypsum board
Exterior surface or facade: Split-face block
Electronic technology systems: ccrv
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels,
satellite/cable

172

General population
Single occupancy: 276
Doubleoccupancy:O
Dorms: 0
Special population
Single occupancy: 16
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 24
Total design: 316
Current population: March 1992: 219

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit 46
Inmates per unit (design): 46
Inmates per unit (current): 25
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: NIA
HVAC: Other energy recycle unit. boiler,
chiller, water cooling tower
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual al.mm stations
Windows: Slit. security glass

Perimeter: Video camera surveillance; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 15%
Medium:78%
Minimum:8%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 14
Security: 99
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 29
Total: 142
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.5: 1
Contracted services: Medical, programs

RilllilllllililllliBII
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition, local
contracting
Negative: NIA

Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: Weather problems

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Illinois
Will County

----------·-····
------··-

..
;

1:

1!

I!

I:

I•

I:
I
I:

I•
, I
I:
I:

l.
I'

J:

/ /'·-....

•

;--.

)'·

~

'

,. ;i

_u_•,
I

I

, ....... ___ ).

__..,

=

~

~

.•

----·

-------

: r----

·: --n-r

1

j

j

;-·~
I
~:~-\-;:.::_[·
'
•
:
11·--·1

.:

1

,\

I

:

f----

'I

.,.-~1- t-~-\---_
. ,. . .

I .. __i__,

l

'
-

i

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

I

I

\
173

Boone County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Boone County

Contact: Em Hudson, Sheriff, Boone County Jail, 1905 Indianapolis Road, Lebanon, IN 46052, 317-482-1412
Architect: Schenkel Shultz, 3702 Rupp Drive, Fort Wayne, IN 46815, 219--484-9080
Construction Manager: N/A

Groundbreaking:May1991
Finish date: June 1992
Construction time: 14 months

Total: $7,600,000
Building only: $7,300,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $3,344,000
Housing per inmate: $20,642
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $39,175
Total per GSF: $97.44
Total per NSF: $152.00
Total annual operating costs: $330,000

-

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels, CMU block,
brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels

174

Total GSF: 78,000
Total NSF: 50,000
Corrections GSF: 78,000
Corrections NSF: 50,000
Housing area GSF: 34,656
Housing area NSF: 25,992
GSF per inmate (design): 402
GSF per inmate (current): 639
NSF per inmate (design): 258
NSF per inmate (current}: 410
Size of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet: 64%

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor swface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HYAC: Gas heat, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit

General population
Single occupancy: 22
Double occupancy: 140
Donns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 8
Double occupancy: 4
Donns:20
Total design: I 94
Current population: January 1993: 122

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 52%
Medium:43%
Minimum: 5%

Jffl"fil'~~~~~--if~j)

-~l;,wmrnrDesign: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: I I
Inmates per unit (design): 20
Inmates per unit (current): 13 (average}
Management type (design}: Indirect
supervision
Management type (current): futemrittent
and remote surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
permanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: I

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 3
Security: 10
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 1
Total: 14
Currentinmate/staff ratio: 8.7:1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Lease-purchase; local
special, time-limited tax levy
Use of inmate labor. None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Indiana
Boone County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

175

Gibson County Jail
Responsible official: Commissioner, Gibson County

Contact: E. Bruce McOellan, Sheriff, Gibson County Jail, 112 E.ast Emerson, Princeton, IN 47670, 812-385-3496
Architect: United Consulting Engineers and Architects, 1625 North Post Road, fudianapolis, IN 46219, 317--895-2585
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 32,300
Total NSF: 23,130
Corrections GSF: 32,300
Corrections NSF: 23,130
Housing area GSF: 23,860
Housing area NSF: 18,500
GSF per inmate (design): 521
GSFperinmate (current): 769
NSF per inmate (design): 373
NSF per inmate (current): 551
Siz.e of cells: 91 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 73%

Groundbreaking: July 1988
Finish date: July 1989
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $2,800,000
Building only: $2,700,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $2,200,000
Housing per inmate: $48,889
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $45,161
Total per GSF: $86.70
Total per NSF: $121.05
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete
futerior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMUblock
Exterior smface or facade: Stucco
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels, satellite/cable

176

General population
Single occupancy: 50
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 12
Total design: 62
Current population: December 1991: 42

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Carpet, sealed concrete, vinyl
tile
futercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, gas heat
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit and special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 80%
Medium:O
Minimum: 20%

Full-time equivalent
Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 6
Inmates per unit (design): 9
Inmates per unit (current): 6
Management type (design): futennittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: NIA

Administration: 10
Security: 18
Programs and treatment: 1
Maintenance: 2
Total:31
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.4: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Total officers per unit

Factors affecting construction costs

Day:3
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Fixed financing rate
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, less expensive
materials, creative use of materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems; phasing required to
maintain existing facility in operation

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Indiana
Gibson County

A-

~

-------~
i:

,....._
3

'1,,:

-~

Ley.a!Jp

i::=ii-~

FIRST FWOR PLAN

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

.......

-~~,,!I.I~.,...,.,....

--- ...........

177

Kosciusko County Work Release
Responsible official: Sheriff, Kosciusko County

Contact: Tom Kitch, Director, Kosciusko County Work Release, 221 West Center, Warsaw, IN 46580, 219--372-2490
Architect: Schenkel Shultz, 3702 Rupp Drive, Fort Wayne, IN 46815, 219--484-9080
Construction Manager: N/A

-

Groundbreaking: April 1991
Finish date: September 1991
Construction time: 5 months

Total: $260,00)
Building only: $252,()(X)
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $81,00)
Housing per inmate: $1,928.57
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $6,190
Total per GSF: $23.64
Total per NSF: $31.52
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

-

Structural: Preexisting
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
futerior walls: Stud and gypsum board
Exterior swface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
surveillance

. .

Total GSF: 11,()(X)
Total NSF: 8,250
Corrections GSF: 11,()(X)
Corrections NSF: 8,250
Housing area GSF: 2,932
Housing area NSF: 2,300
GSF per inmate (design): 262
GSF per inmate (current): 579
NSF per inmate (design): 196
NSF per inmate (current): 434
Size of cells: 109 (double), 214 (donn)
Net/gross square feet: 75%

Door material(s): Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: No locks
Floor swface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: Unknown
HVAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat. forced
air
Plumbing; China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas, manual alann stations
Windows: Slit

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 26
Donns: 16
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy; 0

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Donns:0

Total design: 42
Current population: December 1991: 19

Design: Linear
Cells per unit: 17
Inmates per unit (design): 42
Inmates per unit (current): 3
Management type (design): futennittent
surveillance
Management type (current): futennittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening:2
Midnight: I

-

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 2
Security: 3
Programs and treatment: 1
Maintenance: 0
Total:6
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.2: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods, less
expensive materials
Negative: NIA
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Labor problems

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local special, time-limited
tax levy
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

178

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Indiana
Kosciusko County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

179

Tippecanoe County Law Enforcement Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Tippecanoe County

Contact: David Heath, Sheriff, Tippecanoe County Law Enforcement Center, 2640 Duncan Road, Lafayette, IN 47904, 317-423-9388
Architect: Helhnuth, Obata & Kassabaum, 1831 Chestnut Street, St. Louis, MO 63103, 314-421-2000;
James Associates, 8888 Keystone Crossing, Suite 1400, Indianapolis, IN 46240, 317-571--8866
Construction Manager: Guepel DeMars, 1919 North Meridian, Indianapolis, IN 46206, 317-924-9192

Total GSF: 75,410
Total NSF: 53,600
Corrections GSF: 63,440
Corrections NSF: 45,000
Housing area GSF: 44,727
Housing area NSF: 31,756
GSF per inmate (design): 343
GSF per inmate (current): 322
NSF per inmate (design): 243
NSF per inmate (current): 228
Size of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet: 71 %

Blfllllllilfiliifiiliii
Groundbreaking: September 1988
Finish date: April 1990
Construction time: 19 months

Total: $9,500,000
Building only: $9,090,000
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $5,600,000
Housing per inmate: $31,461
Housing per cell: $39,437
Total per inmate: N/A
TotalperGSF: $125.98
Total per NSF: $177 .24
Total annual operating costs: $4,000,000

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Split face
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, inmate
intercom, paging and sound system,
duress/fire alarm, door control/monitoring,
card access, custom control panels,
satellite/cable

180

General population
Singleoccupancy: 106
Double occupancy: 72
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 7
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 185
Current population: April 1993:197

lllillllftCill!1&fliillll

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 12
Inmates per unit (design): 12
Inmates per unit (current): 12
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
pennanentlyattached
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells
HVAC: Heating/air circulation only,
forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter. Building exterior only, single
fence, rawr wire on fence(s), video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:89%
Minimum: 11 %

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 3
Security: 33
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 2
Total:38
Current inmate/staff ratio: 5.2: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations, multiple bid packages
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: NIA

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Bonding through County
Jail Building Cmporation
Use of inmate labor: Limited; building
components
Use of prefabrication: Limited; building
components

Nll!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Indiana
Tippecanoe County

z
<

-'
a..
a:
0
0
-'
u.
1-

(J)

a:
u.

•
I
I

I

I

I

l

!

• __ , ___.._ _JII

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

181

El Dorado Correctional Facility
Responsible official: Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections

Contact: Michael Nelson, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 311, Route 3 Box 191, El Dorado, KS 67042, 316--321-7284
Architect: Gossen Livingston Associates, 420 South Emporia, Wichita, KS 67202, 316--265-9367
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 434,255
Total NSF: 282,265
Corrections GSF: 434,255
Corrections NSF: 282,265
Housing area GSF: 203,500
Housing area NSF: 162,800
GSF per inmate (design): 678
GSF per inmate (current): 777
NSF per inmate (design): 441
NSF per inmate (current): 505
Size of cells: 90 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 65%

IJl\'lilJllrll.-iilflll@~lij
Groundbreaking:Februaryl990
Finish date: March 1992
Construction time: 21 months

Total: $50,503,049
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $20,110,000
Housing per inmate: $31,422
Housing per cell: $31,422
Total per inmate: $78,911
Total per GSF: $116.30
Total per NSF: $178.92
Total annual operating costs: $13,783,576

Structural: Steel frame, precast concrete
frame
Exterior walls: Insulated precast concrete
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Precast concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
duress/fire alann, door control/monitoring,
custom control panels, perimeter
detection/alann

182

General population
Single occupancy: 640
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 640
Current population: February 1993: 559

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 128
Inmates per unit (design): 128
Inmates per unit (current): 109
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 3
Midnight: 3

lllllitillltflillitfft1fJJl1■

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: Limited; security fence
installation, paving
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; housing
unit wall structure

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: One-way to cells
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: China, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Sprinklers for cells and
common areas
Windows: Slit, security glass

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter p;itrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:0
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 24
Security: 284
Programs and treatment: 102
Maintenance: 44
Total:454
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.2: 1
Contracted services: Medical

ll!WIIIJll_..t,
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); good competition, less
expensive materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials;
coordination of design
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

~

'.::::i

~
....~·
0
;::::

--.
~

...,.,,_

ti

HOU.SUtG

....
.........
"'
"""

-

--i
Cl)

,-,..i~,~--

t"l

c

°""..... "'

~

.Q,
("')
0

~

(1:,

....t"l

c5·

;::::

"'n
0

~

~-

,,

~-,

:)

t

~

....t"l

c5·
;::::

Typical Housing Unit

Typical Housing Unit

First Floor Plan

Second Floor Plan

~·

~·

Typical Housing Unit
Transverse Section

,_.
00
U,l

Johnson County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Jolmson County

Contact: Lany E. Smith, Major,Johnson County Jail, 101 North Kansas Avenue, Olathe, KS 66061, 913-791-1100
Architect: Shaughnessy Fickel and Scott Architects, Inc., 920 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106, 816--474--1397
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 142,995
Total NSF: 110,072
Corrections GSF: 135,854
Corrections NSF: 103,612
Housing area GSF: 94,610
Housing area NSF: 72,827
GSF per inmate (design): 522
GSFperinmate (current): 561
NSF per inmate (design): 402
NSF per inmate (current): 432
Size of cells: 71.9 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 77%

Groundbreaking:April1986
Finish date: August 1988
Construction time: 28 months
~!IL~~~~
~m@i]~B@w<W~~~-

Total: $16,000,000
Building only: $14,275,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $9,530,065
Housing per inmate: $44,533
Housing per cell: $44,533
Total per inmate: $58,395
Total per GSF: $111.89
Total per NSF: $145.36
Total annual operating costs: $8,439,148

Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels, brick
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring, card access, custom control
panels, satellite/cable

184

General population
Single occupancy: 214
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Special population
Single occupancy: 60
Doubleoccupancy:O
Dorms:0
Total design: 274
Current population: December 1991: 255

-Design: Modular/pcxl
Cells per unit: 48
Inmates per unit (design): 48
Inmates per unit {current): 48
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Beds in
dayroom, contract with other jurisdictions

Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: I

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Remote and manual
locking
Floor surface: Carpet, epoxy coating
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel, wood, upholstered
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit

...

'

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:4%
Medium:92%
Minimum:0
Juvenile/medical isolation: 4%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 9
Security: 116
Programs and treatment: 19
Maintenance: 6
Total: 150
Currentinmate/staffratio: 1.7:1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Kansas
Johnson County

I.Jail VisilOr Eleva/Or
2. Inmate/Security Staff Elevatnr
3. Contact Visiting
4. Non-Contact Visiting
5.Janitor Closet
6. Security Staff 7bilet
7. Storage
8.DaySpace
9. Outdoor Exercise
IO. Mecbanicol Equipment
IL Secured Vestibule
12. Inmate Shower
13. Control Booth

TYPICAL INMATE HOUSING
MEZZANINE LEVEL

JlLiII~ ---,
9

--- ---------.1

--..•.------_(- ""
·~ ·.-,-

8

..

.

.
.

''

;
'

....,,;-..,__ -''

•

----------~ ti

[

:
8

5

•

~

i.

r·
5

1,

8

•

~

·----- -- . . • . --- --- 0

TYPICAL INMATE HOUSING
DAY SPACE LEVEL

b

~

,2()

40

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

185

Lansing Correctional Facility-East
Responsible official: Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections

Contact: David R. McKooe, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility-East, P.O. Box 2, Lansing, KS 60043, 913-727-3235
Architect: Horst, Terrill & Karst Architects, 2900 MacVicar Avenue, Topeka, KS 66611, 913-266--5373
Construction Manager: N/A ·

Total GSF: 25,840
Total NSF: 21,336
Corrections GSF: 25,840
Corrections NSF: 21,336
Housing area GSF: 20,920
Housing area NSF: 17,102
GSF per inmate (design): 129
GSFper inmate (current): 129
NSF per inmate (design): 107
NSF per inmate (current): 107
Size of cells: 50 (sleeping cubicle)
Net/gross square feet: 83%

Door material(s): Standard hollow metal
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Electric latch
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to common areas
HVAt: Steam heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Unknown
Fire protection: Smoke detectors
throughout, manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard and screens

IIIPiiltillallllJJlr:i11

Grooodbreaking:Jooe1989
Finish date: December 1989
Construction time: 6 months

Total: $2,027,100
Building only: $1,482,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $1,482,000
Housing per inmate: $7,410
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $10,136
Total per GSF: $78.45
Total per NSF: $95.00
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

--4111-111
Structural: Steel frame, masonry bearing
walls
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, paging and soood
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:200
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 200
Current population: June 1992: 200

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 50
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): 50
Management type (design): Intennittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Intennittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 1

-

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:O
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 2
Security: 16
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 0
Total: 18
Current inmate/staff ratio: 11.1: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple consttuction methods,
good competition, less expensive materials
Negative: NIA
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State institutional building
fund
Use of inmate labor: Limited; concrete
paving
Use of prefabrication: None

186

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Kansas
Lansing

, POD TWO (MALE)---- - -- --- -- ------ -- -- ---------~

i POD 1HREE (MAU:/H.C.)--------------------------

DAYSPACE

'.'"'~;".'l°"l

- -~j---------,-•--

"""'

I

~POD ONE (MALE)--- - --- -- ------------ ----------~

200 BED DORMITORY

Nll!National Directory of Corrections Construction

...

...

187

Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Responsible official: Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections

Contact: Harold J. Nye, Warden, Lamed Correctional Mental Health Facility, Box E, Larned, KS 67550--0280, 316--258-6249
Architect: Gossen Livingston, 420 South Emporia, Wichita, KS 67202, 316--265-9367
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 115,885
Total NSF: 81,120
Corrections GSF: 115,885
Corrections NSF: 81,120
Housing area GSF: 49,528
Housing area NSF: 29,015
GSF per inmate (design): 773
GSF per inmate (current): 966
NSF per inmate (design): 541
NSF per inmate (current): 676
Siz.e of cells: 100 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 70%

Groundbreaking:Februaryl991
Finish date: January 1992
Construction time: 11 months

Total: $15,776,829
Building only: $13,709,785
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $105,179
TotalperGSF: $136.14
Total per NSF: $194.49
Total annual operating costs: $7,300,310

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame, load-bearing masonry
Exterior walls: Precast panels, brick, metal
panel
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: Brick, textured
concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels, perimeter detection/alann,
lighting in towers

188

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Doubleoccupancy:O
Dorms:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 150
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 150
Current population: April 1993: 120

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) ofloc:ks: Remote locking only
floor swface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Stearn heat:, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Single fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alann, razor wire on
fence(s), towers; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:0
Minimum:O

~-~-~-~.-.·
·
...

~
~· .
"·~"

~ , :

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 30
Inmates per unit (design): 30
Inmates per unit (current): 30
Management type (design): Intennittent and
remote surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Intennittent
and remote surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Admissions
curtailed
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

111··
A
Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds, Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; precast
wall/roof construction

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 35
Security: 117
Programs and treatment: 40
Maintenance: 22
Total:214
Current inmate/staff ratio: .6: 1
Contracted services: Medical, food,
programs

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, weather problems;
complex electronic, mechanical, and
electrical systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Kansas
Larned

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

189

Sedgwick County Adult Local Detention Facility
Responsible official: Sheriff, Lake County

Contact: Mitch Paige, Detention Division Captain, Sedgwick County Adult Local Detention Facility, 141 West Ehn Street,
Wichita, KS 67203, 316-383-7205
Architect: Schaefer, John, Cox, Frey & Associates, 220 Soulh Hillside, Wichita, KS 67211, 316-684--0171
Construction Manager: CRSS Constructors, Inc., 21616th Street Mall, Suite 1700, Denver, CO 80202, 303-820-5200

Total GSF: 202,459
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 202,459
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 471
GSF per inmate (current): 526
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Siz.e of cells: 70 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: October 1987
Finish date: April 1990
Construction time: 30 months

Total: $25,700,000
Building only: $20,712,730
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $59,767
TotalperGSF: $126.94
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $4,510,584

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Colored precast
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels

General population
Single occupancy: 398
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 12
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:20
Total design: 430
Current population: March 1992: 385

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 48
Inmates per unit (design): 48
Inmates per unit (current): 48
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, beds in dayroom
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast
exterior panels

190

Door rnaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Unknown
Floor surface: Continuous resin coating
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Hot water
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 23%
Medium:69%
Minimum:8%

Br~SIIJlitlBIIII
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 5
Security: 113
Programs and treatment: 7
Maintenance: 0
Total: 125
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.1: 1
Contracted services: Food, medical, dental

MIJllllllllJfllllllllil
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); good
competition
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time; difficult site conditions;
complex electronic, mechanical, and
electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); advanced
order of materials; coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Kansas
Lake County

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

191

Sedgwick County Work Release
Responsible official: Sheriff, Sedgwick-County

Contact: Lyman Reese, Administrator, Sedgwick County Work Release, 70 I West Harry Street, Wichita, KS 67213, 316--383-7685
Architect: Wilson-Darnell Associates, 128 North Oliver, Wichita, KS 67208, 316--681-2099
Construction Manager: CRSS Constructors, Inc., P.O. Box 87, Wichita, KS 67201, 316--268-3586

Total GSF: Unknown
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: Unknown
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 23,500
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): Unknown
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 3,156 (pod)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: September 1987
Finish date: May 1988
Construction time: 9 months

Total: $1,531,854
Building only: $1,219,412
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $978,300
Housing per inmate: $9,882
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $15,473
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $624,278

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
synthetic plaster
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior smface or facade: Stucco
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, duress/fire alarm, door
control/monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alarm

192

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0

Dorms:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 55
Donns:44
Total design: 99
Current population: March 1992: 59

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 5
Inmates per unit (design): 28
Inmates per unit (current): 28
Management type (design): Intennittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Controlled
admittance to program
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 3
Midnight: 2

-·
Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Unknown
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Carpet, epoxy coating, sealed
concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Gas heat, forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: NIA
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard

Perimeter: Building exterior only, perimeter
detection/alarm, video camera
surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 4
Security: 13
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 0
Total: 17
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.5: I
Contracted services: Food

-

Factors affecting ronstruction costs
Positive: Good competition, less expensive
materials
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Phased construction (fast track),
advanced order of materials, coordination
of design
Negative: N/A

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

·Kansas
Sedgwick County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

193

Shawnee County Adult Detention Facility
Responsible official: Kansas Board of Commissioners, Shawnee County

Contact: Thomas R. Merkel, Jail Administrator, Shawnee County Adult Detention Facility, 501 Southeast Eighth Street, Topeka,
KS 66607, 913--291-5100
Architect: Slemmons Associates, An:hitects, 534 South Kansas Avenue, Suite 1030, Topeka, KS 66603--3432, 913--235-9244
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 124,765
Total NSF: 104,475
Corrections GSF: 124,765
Corrections NSF: 104,475
Housing area GSF: 32,200
Housing area NSF: 14,400
GSF per inmate (design): 627
GSF per inmate (current): 693
NSF per inmate (design): 525
NSF per inmate (current): 580
Size of cells: 80 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 84%

Groundbreaking:September1985
Finish date: March 1988
Construction time: 29 months

Total: $14,407,900
Building only: $14,322,365
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $4,385,000
Housing per inmate: $24,361
Housing per cell: $24,361
Total per inmate: $72,402
Total per GSF: $115.48
Total per NSF: $137.91
Total annual operating costs: $3,926,885

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMU block, brick
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, card
access, custom control panels, perimeter
detection/alarm, satellite/cable

194

General population
Single occupancy: 180
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0

Special population
Single occupancy: 19
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 199
Current population: December 1991: 180

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Mattresses on
floor in gymnasium
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight 1

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Carpet, epoxy coating, sealed
concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells, inmate duress
alarm
HVAC: Gas fire boiler, air-conditioning
Plumbing: Stainless steel, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel, wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only, perimeter
detection/alarm, video camera
surveillance, fenced restraining areas for
emergencies; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 20%
Medium:80%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 3
Security: 74
Programs and treatment: 23
Maintenance: 10
Total: 110
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.6: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple constr. methods, good
competition, less expensive materials
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems; gov. requirements
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
advanced order of materials
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier; weather problems; gov.
procedures and regulations; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

''

'
FUTURE CORRIDOR--•
TO JUDICIAL CENTER

.'.

''

◄
T H I R D

\0

u,

F

Stanton County Law Enforcement Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Stanton County

Contact: James Garrison, Sheriff, Stanton County Law Enforcement Center, 208 North Chestnut, Johnson, KS 67855, 316-492---6866
Architect: N/A
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: ll,718
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 4,216
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 976
GSFperinmate (current): 1,172
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: July 1991
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $260,000
Building only: $200,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $22.19
Total per NSF: $61.67
Total annual operating costs: $363,000

Blfillllt~iilll\1illll
Structural: Block, brick
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Unknown
Electronic technology systems: ccrv
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, duress/fire alann, door
control/monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 5
Double occupancy: 6
Donns:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 1
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Total design: 12
Current population: July 1991: 10

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 7
Inmates per unit (design): IO
Inmates per unit (current): 10
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1
-

___

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s)ofdoors:Swinging,sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Remote and manual
locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas

HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Double fence, video camera
surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 12.5%
Medium:50%
Minimum: 37.5%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 2
Security: 7
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 1
Total: 10
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: N/A
Negative: High labor costs
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Unknown
Finance method: Unknown
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

196

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Kansas
Stanton County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

197

Wyandotte County Detention Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Wyandotte County

Contact: Captain Dewey W. Bond, Warden, Wyandotte County Detention Center, 710 North Seventh Street. Kansas City, KS 66101,
913-573-2865
Architect: Schlup, Becker & Brennan, Fourth and State Avenue, Suite 900, Gateway II, Kansas City, KS 66101, 913-281-4210
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 229,625
TotalNSF: 197,391
Corrections GSF: 186,077
Corrections NSF: 162,123
Housing area GSF: 140,244
Housing area NSF: 124,944
GSFperinmate (design): 502
GSF per inmate (current): 756
NSF per inmate (design): 437
NSF per inmate (current): 659
Size of cells: 72.1 and 90 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 86%

Groundbreaking: January 1988
Finish date: March 1990
Construction time: 23 months

Total: $26,347,685
Building only: $26,000,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $114.74
Total per NSF: $133.48
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior surface or facade: Textured
concrete, colored concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels

198

General population
Single occupancy: 338
Double occupancy: 0

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum:6%
Medium:94%
Minimum:O

Dorms:0

Special population
Single occupancy: 33
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0

Total design: 371
Current population: June 1992: 246

111\llftl

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 44
Inmates per unit (design): 44
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: I
Midnight: 1

.

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Carpet. sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells, inmate duress
alarm
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

-~-

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Bonds by public building
coqx>ration
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

lllalllllll11llrlllP&
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 9
Security: 85
Programs and treatment: 31
Maintenance: 8
Total: 133
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.8: I
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, general contractor
involved at early stage
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
advanced order of materials, coordination
of design
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

1 • Cells
2 • Upper Dayroom
3 - Upper Outdoor Recreation
4 • Visitation
5 • Storage
6 - Classlllcallon Offices
7 • Upper Classlllcallon Dayroom
B - Uppar Ma,<lmun Security Dayroom
9 - Upper Admlnlslrallvo Segregellon Dayroom ·
10 • Control Booth
11 - Juvenile Upper Outdoor Recreellon
12 • High Risk Boys
13 - Upper Boy's Dayroom
14 • Juvenlle Classroom
15 • Juvenile Vlsllallon
16 - Juvenile Arts and Crafts
17 • Juvenile Offices
18 • Upper Women Dayroom
19 • Upper Trustee Dayroom

EE,
NORTH
50

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN

.....

\0

\0

Carroll County Regional Detention Center
Responsible official: Jailer, Carroll County

· Contact: David Miles, Jailer, Carroll County Regional Detention Center, 800 Oay Street, Carrollton, KY 41008, 502-732--9499
Architect: CMW, Inc., 326 South Broadway, Lexington, KY 40508, 606-254-6623
Construction Manager: N/A

Corrections GSF: 14,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: 6,000
GSF per inmate (design): 167
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSFperinmate (design): Unknown
NSFperinmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 81 (single), 75 (double),
420(dorm)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Groundbreaking: July 1991
Finish date: June 1992
Construction time: 12 months

Total: $2,060,000
Building only: $1,874,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $820,000
Housing per inmate: $10,513
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $24,524
TotalperGSF: $147
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

lftW::rn«
Structural: Load-bearing precast panels
Exterior walls: Precast panels, CMU block,
brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels

200

General population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 32
Dorrns:44
Special population
Single occupancy: 4
Double occupancy: 2

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking, motor
driven and remote locking
Floor surface: Lino/sheet vinyl, sealed
concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas, inmate duress alarm
HYAC: Rooftop heating and cooling units
Plumbing: Stainless steel, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas, manual alann stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 38%
Medium:62%
Minimum:O

Dmms:O
Total design: 84
Current population: April 1992: 72

~·
f~~

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 7
Inmates per unit (design): 14
Inmates per unit (current): 14
Management type (design): Intennittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility

Total officers per unit
Day:5
Evening:4
Midnight: 3

-

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 2
Security: 19
Programs and treatment: 3
Maintenance: 0
Total:24
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds; local special, time-limited tax levy
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Kentucky
Carroll County

1-

j

NJJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

201

Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Responsible official: Commissioner, Kentucky Corrections Cabinet

Contact: Michael O'Dea III, Warden, Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex, P.O. Box 636, West Liberty, KY 41472, 606--743-2800
Architect: Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall (DMJM), 300 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, 212-983--2400

Construction Manager: GRW Engineers, Inc., 801 Corporate Drive, Lexmgton, KY 40503

Total GSF: 560,036
Total NSF: 360,000
Corrections GSF: 560,036
Corrections NSF: 360,000
Housing area GSF: 235,496
Housing area NSF: 158,788
GSF per inmate (design): 261
GSF per inmate (current): 368
NSF per inmate (design): 168
NSF per inmate (current): 237
Size of cells: 80 (double)
Net/gross square feet: 64%
~~~~tffi'fffft',£',fil!lfilif~t

=~~Jill&i~aii
Groundbreaking: January 1987
Finish date: February 1991
Construction time: 49 months

Total: $62,999,219
Building only: $61,499,219
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $31,272,640
Housing per inmate: $19,743
Housing per cell: $30,510
Total per inmate: $38,602
Total per GSF: $112.49
Total per NSF: $175.00
Total annual operating costs: $12,999,000

Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame, load-bearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block, cementitious
exterior system (EIFS) over reinforced
CMUblock
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior sutface or facade: Stucco, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring, card access, custom control
panels, perimeter detection/alarm, satellite/
cable

202

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 2,048
Dorms:48
Special population
Single occupancy: 48
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 2,144
Current population: April 1993: 1,520

&
."w~~-l~
~-~-~<@mjfflmifuDesign: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 128

Inmates per unit (design): 128
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
permanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening:2
Midnight: 2

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor sutface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Inmate duress alann
RVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit, special security

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on
fence(s), towers; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:4%
Medium:92%
Minimum:4%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 23
Security: 278
Programs and treatment: 30
Maintenance: 31
Total: 389
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.9: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods; less
expensive materials
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: NIA
Negative: NIA

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Kentucky
West Liberty

-._. ..

/:·-_._··

··:

I

·.

'I

I

I

\

I

'

/
{

I

\

/

O

'

10

20

FL.FU

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

203

Federal Correctional Institution-Oakdale I
Responsible official: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Contact: Keith Hall, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution-Oakdale I, P.O. Box 5050, East Whatley Road, Oakdale, LA 71463,
318--335-4070
Architect: Barron, Heinberg & Brocato Architects & Engineers, 1015 Wisteria Street, Alexandria, LA 71301, 318-443--7291
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 317,266
Total NSF: 235,197
Corrections GSF: 317,266
Corrections NSF: 235,197
Housing area GSF: 184,320
Housing area NSF: 57,037
GSF per inmate (design): 438
GSFperinmate (current): 265
NSF per inmate (design): 324
NSF per inmate (current): 196
Siz.e of cells: 75 (single), 164 (double)
Net/gross square feet: 74%

IIIPJl!lla111Bitlrllllit
GroW1dbreaking: August 1984
Finish date: December 1988
Construction time: 52 months

Total: $24,059,826
Building only: $20,821,395
Final construction cost: Same
Housing area: $12,550,335
Housing per inmate: $38,263
Housing per cell: $25,510
Total per inmate: $33,186
Total per GSF: $75.83
Total per NSF: $102.30
Total annual operating costs: $18,100,000

Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame, precast concrete cells
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door control/
monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alann

204

General population
Single occupancy: 328
Double occupancy: 328
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 69
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 725
Current population: April 1993: 1,198

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 164
Inmates per unit (design): 164
Inmates per unit (current): 225
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, bunk beds in cells
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: I

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; precast
concrete cells and wall panels, prefabricated steel framing, preengineered trusses

Door material(s): Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Epoxy coating, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
INAC: Gas heat, air-conditioning
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common areas, manual alann stations,
duct smoke detectors within air-handling
units, supervised sprinkler system
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alann, razor wire on and
between fence(s), video camera
surveillance, observation moWlds for
patrol vehicles; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 11 %
Medium: 89%
Minimum:0

flliilrAllllllillL. . .
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 41
Security: 190
Programs and treatment: 50
Maintenance: 24
Total: 305
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.9: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, good competition,
less expensive materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, coordination of
design
Negative: Weather problems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Louisiana
Oakdale

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

205

Federal Detention Center-Oakdale II
Responsible official: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Contact: Bob Guzik, Warden, Federal Detention Center-Oakdale II, P.O. Box 5060, East Whatley Road, Oakdale, LA 71463,
318-335-4466
Architect: Barron, Heinberg & Brocato Architects & Engineers, 1015 Wisteria Street, Alexandria, LA 71301, 318-443-7291
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 255,548
Total NSF: 199,610
Corrections GSF: 255,548
Corrections NSF: 199,610
Housing area GSF: 133,896
Housing area NSF: 43,113
GSF per inmate (design): 446
GSF per inmate (current): 198
NSF per inmate (design): 348
NSF per inmate (current): 155
Size of cells: 75 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 78%

-----~
Groundbreaking:September1988
Finish date: September 1991
Construction time: 36 months

Total: $23,955,951
Building only: $22,023,451
Final construction cost: Same
Housing area: $12,925,000
Housing per inmate: $25,645
Housing per cell: $25,645
Total per inmate: $41,808
Total per GSF: $93.74
Total per NSF: $ 120.01
Total annual operating costs: $13,582,900

Structural: Steel frame, precast concrete
cells
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alarm

206

.,••

General population
Single occupancy: 630
Double occupancy: 0
Dorrns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 69
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 699
Current population: January 1993: 1,289

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common areas, manual alann stations,
duct smoke detectors within air-handling
units, sprinkler system
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter. Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alann, razor wire on and
between fence(s), video camera
surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 11 %

Medium:89%
Minimum:0

~•~!!~~~~-~

~~~~~,ccWIBt.~,®&llil'ifflmIB!N

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 168
lnrtlates per unit (design): 168
Inmates per unit (current): 300
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
. Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, bunk beds in cells
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening:2
Midnight: 1

. . .11

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; precast
concrete cells and wall panels,
prefabricated steel framing, millwork,
doors, preengineered trusses

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 40
Security: 190
Programs and treatment: 50
Maintenance: 25
Total:305
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4.2: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, good
competition, less expensive materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, coordination of
design
Negative: Weather problems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Louisiana
Oakdale

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

207

Orleans Parish Prison
Responsible official: Criminal Sheriff, Orleans Parish

Contact: Charles C. Foti, Jr., Criminal Sheriff, Orleans Parish Prison, Perdido Street, New Orleans, LA 70119, 504-822--8000

Architect: L. Dow Oliver & Associates, 3131 Harvard Avenue, Suite 201, Metairie, LA 70006, 504--455--7965
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 53,520
Total NSF: 49,920
Corrections GSF: 53,520
Corrections NSF: 49,920
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 101
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): 94
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 1,485 (donn)
Net/gross square feet: 93%

-

Groundbreaking: December 1988
Finish date: May 1990
Construction time: 17 months

Total: $5,400,000
Building only: $5,200,000
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $10,227
Total per GSF: $101
Total per NSF: $108.17
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

-

Structural: Precast concrete frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior smface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, custom control panels, satellite/
cable

208

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 528
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 528
Current population: Unknown

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 22
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

-

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor smface: Lino/sheet vinyl, sealed
concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Air-conditioning forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for donns
and common areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

-Perimeter: Double fence, razor wire on and
between fence(s), video camera
surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium: 100%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

-

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: NIA
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State and local general
obligation bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Louisiana
Orleans Parish

[] []

Il []

IT

~

[] []
[] []

[]
[] []

]

IT

em

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

R1PI A.AN

209

St. Bernard Jail Complex
Responsible official: Sheriff, St. Bernard Parish

Contact: Jack Stephens, Sheriff, St Bernard Jail Complex, Paris Road and St Bernard Highway, Chalmette, LA 70043, 504--271-2504
Architect: L. Dow Oliver & Associates, 3131 Harvard Avenue, Suite 201, Metairie, LA 70006, 504-455-7965
Construction Manager: N/A

Groundbreaking: December 1990
Finish date: May 1992
Construction time: 17 months

Total: $5,900,000
Building only: $5,750,000
Final construction cost Higher
Housing area: $4,800,000
Housing per inmate: $21,428
Housing per cell: $47,060
Total per inmate: $20,345
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior surlace or facade: Brick, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels,
satellite/cable

210

Total GSF: Unknbwn
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: Unknown
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 35,559
Housing area NSF: 20,765
GSF per inmate (design): Unknown
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 72 (double), 780 (donn)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surlace: Lino/sheet vinyl, carpet,
sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Air-conditioning, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit, standard and bars

General popuJation
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 200
Dorms:24
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 24
Dorms:40
Total design: 290
Currentpopulation:Unknown

•~=®slllllll"
~ ~.'. .~
'
m~~m:<
Perimeter: Double fence, razor wire on and
between fence(s); costs included
Inmate security level
Maxnnum: 76%
Medium: 10%
Minimum: 14%

-

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening:Unknown
Midnight Unknown

-

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: High labor costs, difficult site
conditions, weather problems
Factors affecting time scheduJe
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Weather problems

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

l

i

Louisiana
St. Bernard Parish

.lMffl..E EN1

ITY

r
,Ml

ffCI IIY

IIDN& BP fUI

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

211

Tulane Avenue Facility
Responsible official: Criminal Sheriff, Orleans Parish

Contact: Charles C. Foti, Jr., Criminal Sheriff, Tulane Avenue Facility, Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70119, 504-822--8000
Architect: L. Dow Oliver & Associates, 3131 Harvard Avenue, Suite 201, Metairie, LA 70006, 504-455-7965
Construction Manager: NIA

Groundbreaking: December 1990
Finish date: December 1991
Construction time: 12 months

Total: $2,900,000
Building only: $2,700,000
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $2,400,000
Housing per inmate: $6,452
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $7,796
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Precast concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block,
plaster security partitions, steel
Exterior surface or facade: Unknown
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, custom control panels, satellite/
cable

212

Total GSF: Unknown
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: Unknown
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 30,000
Housing area NSF: 25,200
GSFperinmate (design): Unknown
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 78 (double), 2,400 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Lino/sheet vinyl
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Air-conditioning, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas, manual alann stations
Windows: Slit, standard and bars

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: .96
Dorms: 276
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 372
Current population: Unknown

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), video camera surveillance; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 26%
Medium:0
Minimum: 74%

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition
Negative: Difficult site conditions (work
inside existing building)
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: Weather problems, adaptation of
existing building

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Louisiana
Orleans Parish

[] u]

tr.11.TFUFOSE.
Cl

san«> ecm
NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

pt..AN
213

Androscoggin County Jail
Responsible official: County Commissioner, Androscoggin County

Contact: John R. Lebel, Jail Administrator, Androscoggin County Jail, 40 Pleasant Street, Box 23, Auburn, ME 04210, 207-784-7361

Architect: WBRC Architect, 44 Central Street, Bangor, ME 04401, 207-947-4511
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 69,800
Total NSF: 59,000
Corrections GSF: 69,800
Corrections NSF: 59,000
Housing area GSF: 35,000
Housing area NSF: 29,000
GSF per inmate (design): 572
GSF per inmate (current): 851
NSF per inmate (design): 484
NSF per inmate (current): 720
Size of cells: 70 (single), 140 (double)
Net/gross square feet: 85%

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: August 1990
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $8,900,000
Building only: $8,000,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $4,600,000
Housing per inmate: $42,202
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $72,951
TotalperGSF: $127.51
Total per NSF: $ 150.85
Total annual operating costs: $1,637,841

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Cast-in-place concrete,
CMU block, brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, CMU
. block
Electronic technology systems: CCfV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alarm, satellite/cable

214

General population
Single occupancy: 65
Double occupancy: 30
Dorms: 14
Special population
Singleoccupancy: 13
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 122
Current population: December 1991: 82

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit 10
Inmates per unit (design): 10
Inmates per unit (current): IO
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Beds in
classrooms
Total officers per unit
Day: 10
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: 8

!lllflliJ!!Plt@ml~l~!~l~!l~l!t
Contract method: Public bid
Finance method: Countywide bond issued
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Carpet, epoxy coating, vinyl
tile

Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Forced air

Plumbing: Stainless steel, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Sprinklers for common
areas, smoke and heat sensing units
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Chainlink fence, concrete walls;
costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 15%
Medium:55%
Minimum: 30%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 3
Security: 40
Programs and treatment: 2
Maintenance: 3
Total:48
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.7: I
Contracted services: Medical

lllfiltl:lllllflWl•lii
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: N/A
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems; tight urban slope; approved
juvenile pod within structure
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Phased construction (fast track)
Negative: Phased construction (fast track)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Maine
Androscoggin County

"·~
'l

"'
-::t=-

""

.,

.J

(ii}

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

SECOND FLOOR

215

Baltimore Pre-Release Unit for Women
Responsible official: Commissioner, Maryland Division of Corrections

Contact: Barbara Shaw, Facility Administrator, Baltimore Pre-Release Unit for Women, 301 North Calverton Road, Baltimore, MD 21223,
410--566--5747
Architect: May and Holbrook, 901 North Calvert Street, Baltimore, l\1D 21202, 410--752-1554
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 28,234
Total NSF: 16,952
Corrections GSF: 28,234
Corrections NSF: 16,952
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 382
GSF per inmate (current): 392
NSF per inmate (design): 229
NSF per inmate (current): 235
Size of cells: 131 (double)
Net/gross square feet: 60%

-111111
,,
"" ' 0

,

. ·
- , ;
..
·
·,
~ • •r
.

~

,B:~_w:,_l\';l'~$

Groundbreaking: January 1990
Finish date: July 1991
Construction time: 17 months

Total: $4,021,000
Building only: $3,866,000
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $54,338
TotalperGSF: $142.42
Total per NSF: $237 .20
Total annual operating costs: $1,600,000

Structural: Unknown
Exterior walls: Unknown
Interior walls: Unknown
Exterior surface or facade: Unknown
Electronic technology systems: Unknown

·~

-

General population
Single occupancy: 8
Double occupancy: 64
Donns:O
Special population
Single occupancy; 2
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:O
Total design: 74
Current population: April 1993: 72

Design: Unknown
Cells per unit: 18
Inmates per unit (design): 36
Inmates per unit (current); 36
Management type (design): Unknown
Management type (current): Intermittent
smveillance
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day:7
Evening: 5
Midnight 5

Doormaterial(s): Wood
Type(s)ofdoors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: Unknown
HYAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat
Plumbing: Aluminum
Furniture: Fabric, leather
Fire protection: Sprinklers for cells and
common areas
Windows: Standard and screens

Perimeter: Costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 5
Security: 22
Programs and treatment 2
Maintenance: 1
Total:30
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.4: 1
Contrac~ services: Medical

Factors affecting construction com
Positive: N/A
Negative: NIA
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: NIA

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

216

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Maryland
Baltimore

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

217

Central Laundry Facility
Responsible official: Commissioner, Maryland Division of Corrections

Contact: Marsha Maloff, Warden, Central Laundry Facility, P.O. Box 395, Sykesville, MD 21784, 410--781-4734
Architect: Architectural Technologies, Inc., 8950 Route 108, Suite 218, Columbia, MD 21045, 410--995-4067
Construction Manager: Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., 300 East Joppa Road, Towson, MD 21286, 410--821-1100

;~:~~A&~.a1tli~:~ -''
Total GSF: 27,551
Total NSF: 23,025
Corrections GSF: 27,551
Corrections NSF: 23,025
Housing area GSF: 27,551
Housing area NSF: 23,025
GSF per inmate (design): 108
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): 100
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 1,437.3 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 84%
~~~~~411~
-~~~~~~m@f

Groundbreaking: December 1989
Finish date: June 1990
Construction time: 7 months

Total: $3,150,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $3,150,000
Housing per inmate: $12,305
Housing per cell: $393,750
Total per inmate: $12,305
Total per GSF: $114.33
Total per NSF: $136.81
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

11aw•••

Structurai:Steelframe,precastroofpanels
Exterior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block, glazed block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:256
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 256
Current population: June 1992: 256

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 32
Inmates per unit (current): 32
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 2
Midnight:2

-Contract method: Turnkey design-build
lfali
Finance method: Private-sector funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; precast
roof panels

218

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking, manual locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, steam heat,
forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security, security screens

Perimeter: Building exterior only, double
fence, razor wire on and between fence(s);
costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 0
Security: 6
Programs and treatment: 2
Maintenance: 1
Total:9
Current inmate/staff ratio: 28.4: 1
Contracted services: Medical

la'IIBiJIIIIL-.Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: High labor costs, difficult site
conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, coordination of
design
Negative: Weather problems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Maryland
Sykesville

~l

..

~

h ..

.
Gl

'

z,i:
.J
Q.

1I
1

I

I
t
I

a

a

.J

IL ,

It

w
:,:

a·- -

~

.J

©

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

219

Jessup Pre-Release Unit
Responsible official: Commissioner, Maryland Division of Corrections

Contact: Thomas Corcoran, Warden, Jessup Pre-Release Unit, P.O. Box 536, Jessup, MD 20794--0536, 410--799-1363
Architect: Architectural Technologies, Inc., 8950 Route 108, Suite 218, Columbia, MD 21045, 410--995--4067
Construction Manager: Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., 300 East Joppa Road, Towson, MD 21286, 410--821-1100

Total GSF: 48,768
Total NSF: 40,052
Corrections GSF: 48,768
Corrections NSF: 40,052
Housing area GSF: 12,228
Housing area NSF: 10,158
GSF per inmate (design): 116
GSF per inmate (current): 116
NSF per inmate (design): 95
NSF per inmate (current): 95
Size of cells: 3,571 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 82%

~~}ffli~~~~~-i®\f.®I
¾~t~'1=-~~dlW~.At¥1iltm
Groundbreaking: March 1990
Finish date: July 1990
Construction time: 5 months

Total: $6,300,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $1,400,000
Housing per inmate: $3,333
Housing per cell: $233,333
Total per inmate: $15,000
Total per GSF: $129.18
Total per NSF: $157.30
Total annual operating costs: $7,500,000

■IIIIBlJlllll:illlB!

Structural: Steel frame, preengineered
building system
Exterior walls: Preengineered building
system
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block, preengineered building system
Exterior swface or facade: CMU block,
glazed block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels

220

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:420
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0

Donns:O
Total design: 420
Current population: December 1992: 420

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 70
Inmates per unit (current): 70
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

llr(J,. ~ L~~~,=,
Contract method: Turnkey design-build
Finance method: Private-sector funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Extensive;
preengineered building system

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking, manual locking
Floor swface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security, security screens

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, razor wire on fence(s); costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 14
Security: 98
Programs and treatment 3
Maintenance: 5
Total: 120
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.5: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track)
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); advanced
order of materials; coordination of design
Negative: Weather problems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction
I

I

Maryland
Jessup

.•
i ~·
••
-' ·...,,'•~
•'
,,

<

:
Io .; ..,"

.

i_~ ;~
::t.; v-,.

0

_Ii. ~i ...g
? .. : ..
: :a 0 ;;;

.
~

.......

.......

~

~

-;•

.

II

I

-·.....

.
·•
.

;

-.

.....

·i

!

....s,w.L -

·'

i

©

~

.•

-;

,!

i

-'ii

~

l

i'0s

e

©
~

.

.

~

'i

.

:J
-

©.

.
.

-.

a

-------

·=

-~

-

.,

i

•

-

-: -i

.

f

.,. 1

·,

':"I

a
.;
i. ;_
il

..;,

.

I

·t

-.

.

-·

.

.
.

.

-~

N

-~

.
-.
.
·~
·.;

·:

;I

..

•;

·,

~

I

!

'''

&

I

...

I

',_I
I
I

'I
l

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I'l
I
I

'
,. m

"'
=--<
~

;;;

"'z

• <l
.. J
:

0..

.. a::
~ 0

.83.,
"-

.: I-

..

• a::

~ "-

.

8"' .

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

221

Montgomery County Detention Center
Responsible official: Director, Montgomery County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation

Contact: Albert Hanulik, Acting Warden, Montgomery County Detention Center, 1307 Seven Locks Road, Rockville, MD 20854,
301-294--1700
Architect: Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, 1110 Vennont Avenue NW., Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005, 202-457-9400
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 46,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 46,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 43,000
Housing area NSF: 23,650
GSFperinmate(design): 351
GSFperinmate (current): 176
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 90 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: April 1984
Finish date: July 1986
Construction time: 26 months

Total: $5,878,000
Building only: $5,278,000
Final construction cost Higher
Housing area: $5,278,000
Housing per inmate: $43,983
Housing per cell: $43,983
Total per inmate: $44,870
TotalperGSF: $127.78
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Textured
concrete
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door control/
monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alann

222

General population
Single occupancy: 120
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 11
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 131
Current population: April 1993: 262

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 14
Inmates per unit (design): 14
Inmates per unit (current): 28
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
pennanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening:2
Midnight: 2

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Steam heat
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
connnon areas
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, perimeter detection/alarm; costs
excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium: 100%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 3
Security: 38
Programs and treatment: 2
Maintenance: 0
Total:43
Current inmate/staff ratio: 6.1: 1
Contracted services: Medical, commissary

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Site conditions

lllllLl!lllf&l:elitliJII
Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State and local general
obligation bonds, cost shared by local
jurisdictions
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Maryland
Montgomery County

---

-

-

--

ROOF PUN

SECOND MEZZANINE PLAN

FIRST MEZZANINE PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

223

Montgomery County Detention Center
Responsible official: Director, Montgomery County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation

Contact: Albert Hanulik, Acting Warden, Montgomery County Detention Center, 1307 Seven Locks Road, Rockville, l'vID 20854,
301-294--1700
Architect: James A Lichty, 9948 West 87, Overland Park, KS 66206, 913-341-2356
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 39,043
Total NSF: 33,427
Corrections GSF: 39,043
Corrections NSF: 33,427
Housing area GSF: 39,043
Housing area NSF: 33,427
GSFperinmate (design): 118
GSFperinmate (current): 145
NSF per inmate (design): 101
NSF per inmate (current): 124
Size of cells: 80 (single), 160 (double)
Net/gross square feet: 86%

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Carpet, sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HYAC: Forced air .
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture: Wood, vinyVplastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

JB111lllilllllliBl1111•1
General population
Groundbreaking: October 1989
Finish date: July 1990
Construction time: 7 months

Total: $6,700,000
Building only: $6,600,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $6,600,000
Housing per inmate: $22,000
Housing per cell: $44,000
Total per inmate: $20,303
TotalperGSF: $171.61
Total per NSF: $200.44
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Precast concrete cells
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: Precast panels
Exterior sutface or facade: Stucco, textured
concrete
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, paging and sound system,
door control/monitoring

Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 300
Dorms: 0
Special population
Single occupancy: 22
Double occupancy: 8
Donns:0
Total design: 330
Current population: February 1993: 270

~, ' ·ww-·
· ~ t ···-·······_·, ·. ,. ,mm~;~i®'&!l
-¼l~Jt~wtm~~~1fil

-dill :m,m<'
. "'·-".;;, •• ·»fud'. '1ilffiif~•
-

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 30
Inmates per unit (design): 60
Inmates per unit (current): 60
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
pennanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

lltllllfjl

••

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, perimeter detection/alarm; costs
excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium: 100%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 0
Security: 42
Programs and treatment 8
Maintenance: 0
Total: 50
Current inmate/staff ratio: 5.4: I
Contracted services: Medical, commissary

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, phased
construction (fast track)
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Turnkey design-build
Finance method: State and local general
obligation bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Extensive; precast
panels

224

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Maryland
Montgomery County

i
-l--~--"!11=1=-="""""c=!="'-"'""'"-'=F"-=""""""'=;1

l

i

if
·1

1 -__o=;=j=a;-=;~=;;=~;=-;=i=--=.i'!'-'rii

'.

lll--...-r..----.--...--=t=._-=~

,

di "

I

'

'

t

l :;:

+- ...
I

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

225

Patuxent Institution
Responsible official: Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services

Contact: Archie Gee, Warden, Patuxent Institution, P.O. Box 7000, Jessup, :MD 20794, 410--799-3400
Architect: Architectural Technologies, Inc., 8950 Route 108, Suite 218, Columbia, :MD 21045, 410--995--4067
Construction Manager: Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., 300 East Joppa Road, Towson, :MD 21204,410--821-l 100

Total GSF: 13,785
Total NSF: 11,330
Corrections GSF: 13,785
Corrections NSF: 11,330
Housing area GSF: 13,785
Housing area NSF: 11,330
GSF per inmate (design}: 108
GSFperinmate(current): 108
NSF per inmate (design): 89
NSF per inmate (current): 89
Size of cells: 1,676 (donn)
Net/gross square feet: 82%

IIIIIIW1..Groundbreaking: December 1989
Finish date: June 1990
Construction time: 6 months

Total: $1,300,000
Building only: $1,300,000
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $1,300,000
Housing per inmate: $10,156
Housing per cell: $325,000
Total per inmate: $10,156
Total per GSF: $94.31
Total per NSF: $114.74
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Steel frame, precast roof panels
Exterior walls: CMU block, cavity wall
system
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block, glazed block
Exterior swface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels

226

Genera1 population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns: 124
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:4
Total design: 128
Current population: January 1993: 128

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 32
Inmates per unit (current): 32
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

Contract method: Turnkey design-build
Finance method: State funded
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s} of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common

areas
HYAC: Heating/air circulation, steam heat,
forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for donns and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security and screens

Perimeter: Building exterior only, double
fence, razor wire on and between fence(s);
costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:0
Minimum:O

Full•time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: High labor costs
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, coordination of
design
Negative: Weather problems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

z:,..:..,e'------+---'

-- -~L1~1':1_ru.
~
'

➔-H--1''"''~"---.-

.

-

N

OAYROOH
J;.L, 'I.ti,

'I
I
'
;!
'
'''t 1'I 3·'2-BEO

#'2

,.
I

,ti

I

@
I

l 3'2-BEO

.

- -

OORH

#1

-

....

• 3'2-BED

....

EXIi<TtMG TUNNF.:L

DORM

"'3

...

-• I

9;, 1 . i - - - ~
!
I

1

DDRH

.#-1:
'

Norfolk County Sheriff's Office and Correctional Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Norfolk County

Contact: Gifford H. Marshall, Sheriff, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office and Correctional Center, 200 West Street, Dedham, MA 02026,
617-329--0730
Architect: The Architect's Collaborative, 46 Brattle Street, Cambridge, MA 02146, 617--868-4200
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 144,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 144,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 365
GSF per inmate (current): 409
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 70 (single), 120 {double and
donn)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Groundbreaking: July 1989
Finish date: October 1991
Construction time: 27 months

Total: $32,000,000
Building only: $27,800,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $81,218
Total per GSF: $222.22
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $15,200,000

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, brick
futerior walls: CMU block, brick
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels, perimeter
detection/alann, satellite/cable

228

General population
Single occupancy: 212
Double occupancy: 96
Donns:62
Special population
Single occupancy: 23
Double occupancy: 1
Donns:0
Total design: 394
Current population: January 1993: 352

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
pennanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight 1
.
w:-C8

~

>

.....,.,..,..,,.,,.,..........

'
w.

~

.
•
.

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; precast
concrete exterior panels

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and manual
locking
Floor surface: Lino/sheet vinyl, carpet, vinyl
tile
futercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas, inmate duress alann
HYAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture: Wood, vinyl
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
comnion areas, manual alann stations
Windows: Security with horizontal steel
tubes

Perimeter: Single fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alann; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 70%
Medium:20%
Minimum: 10%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 19
Security: 123
Programs and treatment 56
Maintenance: 29
Total: 227
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.6: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

-

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Phased construction (fast track),
good competition, less expensive materials
Negative: Coordination between agencies
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track}; advanced
order of materials; coordination of design
Negative: Coordination between agencies

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Massachusetts
Norfolk County

,-111:XJ~
1-<l ,.--········, H
\--, :.. ,

:-' t--1

H 111
i

~=-""--I

: D-t

i --i

I •.
·-

:.....•..1:::r"' .. _.:

--

~

-

f

I>--!

~I___.·.
.
...I

8

1-R
MMj

:::{

-~---··

.

,=:!::;!11::;::r-'

-r.-·-->

;

:

.

.. _,;,.___ ,j

i"""i
l

I

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

229

Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility
Responsible official: Director, Michigan Department of Corrections

Contact: Raymond Toornbs, Warden, Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility, 1576 West Bluewater Highway, Ionia, MI 48846,
616---527-6331
Architect: R.C. Byce & Associates,487 Portage Street, Kalamazoo, MI 49007, 616---381-6170
Construction Manager: Oark Construction Company, 3225 West St Joseph Street, Lansing, MI48917, 517-372-0940

Total GSF: 263,381
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 263,381
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 125,000
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate (design): 395
GSF per inmate (current): 450
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 80 (single), 228 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: June 1985
Finish date: May 1987
Construction time: 20 months

Total: $34,000,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost Same
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $51,051
Total per GSF: $129.09
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $18,410,663

IIBlllllliillt!ti\llitll
Structural: Load-bearing masonry
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block, brick
Exterior surtace or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alarm, satellite/cable

230

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:240
Special population
Single occupancy: 426
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 666
Current population: April 1993: 585

flllll1._llri~l1~1J!l:~!I

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 80
Inmates per unit (design): 80
Inmates per unit (current): 75
Management type (design): Intermittent
sUNeillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
SUNeillance
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells
Total officers per unit
Day:6
Evening: 6
Midnight: 3

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: State general funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floorsurface:Terrazo
Intercom: One-way to cells, inmate duress
alarm
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, hot water
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel, concrete
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers, video camera
surveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 60%
Medium:40%
Minimum:O

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 36
Security: 277
Programs and treatment: 38
Maintenance: 9
Total: 360
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.6: 1
Contracted services: Pest control, garbage

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good construction management
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track);
coordination of design
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Michigan
Ionia

z

~

~_,
u..
...J

~.J

a:

;a

_,

I
NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

231

Macomb County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Macomb County

Contact: Dr. Donald J. Amboyer, Jail Administrator, Macomb County Jail, 43565 Elizabeth Road, Mt Clemens, MI 48043, 313--469-5024
Architect: Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc., 1831 Chestnut Street, St Louis, MO 63103, 314-421-2000;
Wakey Associates, 30500 VanDyke Avenue, Suite M-7, Warren, MI 48093, 313--573--4100
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 202,042
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 202,042
Corrections NSF: Unknown
HousingareaGSF: 167,700
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 225
GSFper inmate (current): 228
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSFperinmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 75 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: October 1984
Finish date: June 1987
Construction time: 32 months

Total: $27,000,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $22,400,000
Housing per inmate: $25,926
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $30,033
Total per GSF: $133.64
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $16,400,000

·-•--•....a
Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: Clay-faced tile
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, inmate intercom, paging and
sound system, duress/fire alarm, door
controVmonitoring, custom control panels

General population
Single occupancy: 216
Double occupancy: 648
Dorms: 0
Special population
Single occupancy: 35
Doubleoccupancy:0
Dorms:0
Total design: 899
Current population: February 1993: 885

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 18
Inmates per unit (design): 36
Inmates per unit (current): 36
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
and remote surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Mattresses on
floor, second bunk permanently attached

Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

','':"}:

-·

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote and manual
locking
Floor surface: Carpet, epoxy coating, sealed
concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Video camera surveillance; costs
excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 25%
Medium:50%
Minimum: 25%

-·
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 4
Security: 167
Programs and treatment: 65
Maintenance: 4
Total:240
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.7: 1
Contracted services: Medical, food

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Weather problems

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

232

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Michigan
Macomb County

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

233

Sergeant William Dickerson Detention Facility
Responsible official: Director, Wayne County

Contact: Peter Wilson, Sergeant William Dickerson Detention Facility, 3502 Hamtramck Drive, Hamtramck, MI 48211, 313--875-7006
Architect: Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc., 1831 Chestnut Street, St Louis, MO 63103, 314-421-2000
Construction Manager: Barton-Malow, 27777 Franklin Road, Southfield, MI 48034, 313--351-4500

Total GSF: 518,635
Total NSF: 302,306
Corrections GSF: 518,635
Corrections NSF: 302,306
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFper inmate (design): 585
GSF per inmate (current): 960
NSFperinmate(design): 341
NSF per inmate (current): 560
Size of cells: 70.5 (single), 235 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 50%

Groundbreaking: October 1989
Finish date: September 1991
Construction time: 23 months

Total: $54,975,000
Building only: $52,975,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $62,048
Total per GSF: $106
Total per NSF: $181.85
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

1:1111111

Structural: Precast concrete frame, loadbearing exterior masonry
Exterior walls: Brick, precast lintels
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate inten:om, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, card access, custom control
panels, satellite/cable

234

General population
Single occupancy: 480
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:360
Special population
Single occupancy: 46
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0 ·
Total design: 886
Current population: April 1993: 540

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 60
Inmates per unit (design): 60
Inmates per unit (current): 60
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Turnkey design-build
Finance method: Local special, time-limited
tax levy
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate;
prefabricated concrete columns, hollowcore planks, and lintels

Doormaterial(s): Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Lino/sheet vinyl, carpet,
sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alann
HYAC: Gas heat, forced air
Plumbing: China, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel, wood, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, manual alann stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, video camera surveillance; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maxirnum:5%
Medium:27%
Minimum: 68%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 15
Security: 125
Programs and treatment: 9
Maintenance: 4
Total: 153
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.5: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); less expensive materials
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); advanced
order of materials; coordination of design
Negative: N/A

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

ALTERf,/ATIVE
WORKFORCE
ENTRAr,iCE

~-I
21

PUBLIC
ENTRAlllCE

-----,
-~-J:

UNIT TYPE Ill
OORMITORV

LEVEL ONE

1 Vohlcla Sallypo~
2IMW•Ptopony

111..obtrf
12 VllllarW,;tlng

21-

31'-.Wolting

t3 Adl'lll!llstrlllonO-s

4 Hol<llng

14 Sllff L.ocl<III
1! Tllllnlng

ti

11a•c.•

Z1 PIOllram
24 Exon:IN
25 Vl&lt

aMoot.,Conlro!

380.n!BlS......S

11 Slt.fl'Oinlng
11FoodS....,.
20 L.auodly

il:7~m
28 -111 Ubrory

37 Clorl<lll

30 _.WIHlng

11111-•

!
IModlcal

7-

• Claosilk:ation Offlc<o

9 l.t>lfi.Puq,cJoe
10 UnlHIP

17 Plllonor Lod<ara

22~

29 Sto-

31 Nu...
32-Reeord•
33-0ffice•
34 X•Ray

S5 Modica! Lab
38fltno11
39 Maln!anan011
40 CommilSal)'

41 Control

UNIT TYPE Ill
DORMITORY

SERlllCE

Hennepin County Adult Detention Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Hennepin County

Contact: Michael Jalma, Captain, Hennepin County Adult Detention Center, Room 6, 300 South Fourth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55415,
612-348--8358
Architect: Setter Leach & Lindstrom, Inc., 1100 Peavey Building Second Avenue at Eighth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402-2454,
612-338--8741
Construction Manager: N/A
Total GSF: 22,650
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 22,650
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 22,650
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFper inmate {design): 208
GSF per inmate (current): 184
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 70 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

lll\lf

Groundbreaking: February 1984
Finish date: July 1987
Construction time: 41 months

Total: $3,207,851
Building only: $3,207,851
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $2,383,000
Housing per inmate: $21,862
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $29,430
Total per GSF: $141.63
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $4,310,124

Structural: Existing concrete/masoruy
Exterior walls: Existing stone with new
interior CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Existing stone
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, inmate intercom, paging and
sound system, duress/fire alarm, door
control/monitoring, custom control panels,
satellite/cable

lltllltt

General population
Single occupancy: 81
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:28
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 109
Current population: January 1992: 123

l;~~i!ir~~~--"""'"'vtm"'"""'ffiL~
~~~~i!itt~~,-~11

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 8
Inmates per unit (design): 8
Inmates per unit (current): 8
Management type (design): Intermittent and
remote surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
and remote surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, second bunk pennanently
attached
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening:2
Midnight: 1

--~lj
Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Unknown
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

236

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Epoxy coating
Intercom: Two-way to cells
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Security screens, standard

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
excluded

hnnate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:O
Minimum:0

.. .....21~

Full-time equivalent

Administration: 1
Security: 20
Programs and treatment: 3
Maintenance: 2
Total: 26
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4.7: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time; difficult site conditions;
complex electronic, mechanical, and
electrical systems; construction phasing
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems;
unexpected delays due to age of building

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Minnesota
Hennepin County

PLAN - 5th FLOOR HCADC
QUAD 5

8 BEDS

ROTUNDA

VISITING

Q-UAD 7
SOUTHWEST

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

237

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Shakopee
Responsible official: Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Corrections

Contact: Connie M. Roehrich, Superintendent, Minnesota Correctional Facility-Shakopee, 1010 West Sixth Avenue, Box 7, Shakopee,
~55379,612-496-4441
Architect: Helhnuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc., 1831 Chestnut Street, St Louis, MO 63103, 314-421-2000;
BWBR, 400 Sibley Street, Suite 500, St Paul, MN 55101, 612-222-3701
Construction Manager: N/A
Total GSF: 107,867
Total NSF: 72,050
Corrections GSF: 107,867
Corrections NSF: 72,050
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 749
GSF per inmate (current): 740
NSF per inmate (design): 500
NSF per inmate (current): 493
Size of cells: 103 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 67%

11111:{llil._l'Jlill
Groundbreaking: September 1984
Finish date: August 1986
Construction time: 24 months

Total: $15,000,000
Building only: Unknown ·
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: Unknown
Total per GSF: $139.06
Total per NSF: $208.19
Total annual operating costs: $5,747,484

Structural: Unknown
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: Concrete block, gypsum
board, burnished block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Unknown

General population
Single occupancy: 106
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 106
Current population: February 1993: 146

lrllllf&llllllli1Jillll1

Design: Other
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, bunk beds in "wing
lounge"

Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 2
Midnight: 1

Door material(s): Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
floor surface: Oupet, quarry tile
Intercom: Unknown
HVAC: Multiple fuel energy plant utilizing
peat and wood
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Unknown
Fire protection: Unknown
Windows: Unknown

Perimeter: Single fence, perimeter border
created by landscaping; costs included

Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 32
Security: 52
Programs and treatment: 20
Maintenance: 11
Total: 115
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.3: 1
Contracted services: Medical, food

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Unknown
Finance method: Unknown
Use of inmate labor: Unknown
Use of prefabrication: Unknown

238

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Minnesota
Shakopee

.·c:

r------------

::,

7

C:

I
I

·-.,ca
0

I
I

cs,

I

ecs,

,...

I
I

cl

I

I
I
I
--- -

_ _ _ _ _ _ _J

•

,-

II)

,11

t __ -

I

I1-■--=-

L

I

l

I
I

N

L---------~-~7--........,--'==~
I

1•- - - - - - - - - - - - \

N

,-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

0

IO

I
, - - - - - - - - - - - - __ J

I
I

LO

I

N

I
I
I _ _111111 . __ _ . II
L ____________ J

0

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

...

0

239

Sherburne County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Sherburne County

Contact: Stephen Daniels, Jail Administrator, Sherburne County Jail, 13880 Highway 10, P.O Box 308, Elk River, MN 55330,
612-241-2500
Architect: Birkeland Architects (out of business)
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 133,232
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 22,330
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 22,330
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFper inmate (design): 447
GSF per inmate (current): 429
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: NIA
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: January 1987
Finish date: June 1988
Construction time: 18 months

Total: Unknown
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $2,950,000
Housing per inmate: $59,000
Housing per cell: $59,000
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block, brick
futerior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv srnveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door control/
monitoring, card access, custom control
panels

240

General population
Single occupancy: 50
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 50
Current population: January 1992: 52

111111&11&4111,r1r111tfi
Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 4
Inmates per unit (design): 4
fumates per unit (current): 4
Management type (design): futermittent
srnveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 3
Midnight: 3

lilBJ

rEalfi,i

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging, sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking, manual
locking
Floor surface: Carpet, epoxy coating, sealed
. concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells and common
areas, duress voice alarm
HVAC: Steam heat, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera srnveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 12%
Medium:64%
Minimum: 24%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 2
Security: 17
Programs and treatment: 3
Maintenance: 0
Total:22
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.4:1
Contracted services: Unknown

1111:-.11DJ11111!~
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Unknown
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Minnesota
Sherburne County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NJJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

241

Harrison County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Harrison County

Contact: Rick Gaston, Administrator, Hamson County Jail, 10451 Larkin!. Smith Drive, Gulfport, MS 39503, 601--865-7072
Architect: Rosser Justice Systems, 524 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30308, 404--876--3800
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: Unknown
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 204,000
Corrections NSF: 127,000
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 476
GSF per inmate (current): 408
NSF per inmate (design): 296
NSF per inmate (current): 254
Siz.e of cells: 82 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 62%

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: Unknown
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $13,000,000
Building only: $12,600,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $9,000,000
Housing per inmate: $23,438
Housing per cell: $23,438
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $1,493,258

Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame, load-bearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surlace or facade: EIFS
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV sUIVeillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels, perimeter
detection/al.arm, satellite/cable

242

General population
Single occupancy: 384
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 5
Double occupancy: 40
Donns:0
Total design: 429
Current population: January 1993: 500

-

~
-~=i!

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
SUIVeillance
Management type (current): Remote
sUIVeillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day: 16
Evening: 16
Midnight: 16

Contract methcxl: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance methcxl: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel

Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alann, general paging
HVAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat, forced
air

Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence perimeter detection/al.arm; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 17%
Medium:83%
Minimum:O

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 2
Security: 31
Programs and treatment: 4
Maintenance: 1
Total:38
Current inmate/staff ratio: 13.2: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

liltFactors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, less expensive
materials, bidding alternative construction
systems
Negative: NIA
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Mississippi
Harrison County

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

243

Boone County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Boone County

Contact: Warren Brewer, Division Commander, Boone County Jail, 2121 County Drive, Columbia, MO 65202, 314-875-1111
Architect: Durrant Architects, Inc., One Cycare Plaza, Dubuque, IA 52001, 319-583-9131
Construction Manager: CRSS Constructors, Inc., 106 North Seventh Street, Columbia, MO 65201, 314-874-2514

Total GSF: 53,476
Total NSF: 39,475
Corrections GSF: 38,252
Corrections NSF: 28,209
Housing area GSF: 31,913
Housing area NSF: 24,367
GSFper inmate (design): 206
GSF per inmate (current): 324
NSF per inmate (design): 152
NSF per inmate (current): 239
Size of cells: 79 (single), 126 (double),
373 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 74%

Groundbreaking: June 1989
Finish date: February 1991
Construction time: 20 months

Total: $5,632,381
Building only: $5,447,400
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $105.32
Total per NSF: $142.68
Total annual operating costs: $1,473,699

lllllifflililtll!llllii

Structural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block,
metal stud, gypsum board
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: Unknown

General population
Single occupancy: 60
Double occupancy: 48
Dorms: 19
Special population
Single occupancy: 5
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 50
Total design: 186
Current population: May 1992: 118

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 20
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Local special, time-limited
tax levy
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast
concrete panels

244

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging, sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
· Intercom: Two-way to cells, inmate duress
alarm
HVAC: Forced air, air to air heat/recovery,
direct digital control system
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Security glass block

Perimeter: Double
razor wire on and
between fence(s), video camera
surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 16%
Medium:21%
Minimum: 63%

llll&IIIIJIEtlill1i11
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 6
Security: 26
Programs and treatment 0
Maintenance: 3
Total:35
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.4: 1
Contracted services: Medical

1E~-~illllll[_:l'1fllillJ
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); good
competition
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods;
phased construction (fast track); advanced
order of materials; coordination of design
Negative: NIA

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Missouri
Boone County

•

!

n

.. ii

·... .:; ~. . . .

.

•

··rrI

.

.

. I

i I
I

•

I

"ij
,..____.,
t

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

••T·

·'

...._

,·

! ~~··

245

Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center
. Responsible official: Director, Missouri Department of Corrections

Contact: Donald L. Smith, Superintendent, Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center, P.O. Box 190, State Route 0, Fulton, MO 65251,
314-592-4040
Architect: Hoffman DeMichele, Inc., 710 North Second Street, Suite 200 South, St Louis, MO 63102, 314-621-0700
Construction Manager: CRSS Constructors, Inc., 106 North Seventh Street, Columbia, MO 65201, 314--874-2514

Total GSF: 297,000
Total NSF: 194,000
Corrections GSF: 297,000
Corrections NSF: 194,000
Housing area GSF: 297,000
Housing area NSF: 194,000
GSF per inmate (design): 580
GSF per inmate (current): 280
NSF per inmate (design): 380
NSF per inmate (current): 183
Size of cells: 84 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 65%

QIIJflll81~~1~~~ll~~-~ffi~I~J~~1
Groundbreaking: September 1984
Finish date: May 1987
Construction time: 24 months

Total: $29,094,184
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $18,000,000
Housing per inmate: $35,156
Housing per cell: $35,156
Total per inmate: $56,825
Total per GSF: $97.96
Total per NSF: $149.97
Total annual operating costs: $3,097,710

Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame, load-bearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior sruface or facade: Brick, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, inmate intercom, paging and
sound system, duress/fire alarm, door
control/monitoring, satellite/cable, joint
domain system, taut wire system, fence
disturbance system

246

General population
Single occupancy: 512
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 512
Current population: December 1992: 1,062

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 64
Inmates per unit (design): 64
Inmates per unit (current): 128
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, mattresses on floor, beds
in dayroom, second bunk
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor sruface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm, general paging
throughout
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter
detection/alarm, razor wire on and between
fence(s), towers; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 81 %
Medium: 19%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: I0
Security: 143
Programs and treatment: 111
Maintenance: I6
Total:270
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.9: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Blllli§i-iiti111iili~
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); good
competition
Negative: High labor costs; difficult site
conditions; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track);
coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier; weather problems;
complex electronic, mechanical, and
electrical systems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Missouri
Fulton

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

247

Marion County Jail and Law Enforcement Center
Responsible official: Presiding Commissioner, Marion County

Contact: Dan Campbell, Sheriff, Marion County Jail and Law Enforcement Center, 210 West Lafayette, Pahnyra. MO 63461,
314-769-2077
Architect: Abend Singleton Associates, Inc., 1200 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64106, 816--221-5011
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 29,700
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 24,200
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 19,500
Housing area NSF: 18,600
GSFperinmate (design): 267
GSF per inmate (current): 733
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Siz.e of cells: 60.7 (single), 115 (double)
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Groundbreaking: June 1991
Finish date: September 1992
Construction time: 15 months

Total: $3,176,000
Building only: $3,075,930
Final construction cost Unknown
Housing area: $2,220,000
Housing per inmate: $30,833
Housing per cell: $37,000
Total per inmate: N/A
TotalperGSF: $106.94
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $907,222

Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing
masonry walls
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: Brick, glazed
CMU block, split face
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring, custom control panels

General population
Single occupancy: 48
Double occupancy: 32
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 5
Double occupancy: 0
Danns: 5
Total design: 90
Current population: January 1993: 33

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
hnnates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 2
Midnight:2

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation

Door material(s): Steel

Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor swface: Epoxy coating
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Gas heat, forced air
. Plwnbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit and special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximwn: 10%
Medium:80%
Minimwn: 10%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 3
Security: 22
Programs and treatment: 3
Maintenance: 1
Total:29
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.1: 1
Contracted services: Phone

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Weather problems; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems

bonds

Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

248

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Missouri
Marion County

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

249

Western Missouri Correctional Center
Responsible official: Director, Missouri Department of Corrections

Contact: Michael L. Kemna, Superintendent, Western Missouri Correctional Center, Route 5, Box IE, Cameron, MO 64429-0376,
816--632-1390
Architect: Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff, 1201 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106, 816--472-1201
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 462,865
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 462,865
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 444
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 85,9 (double)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

lllllPAilllBlllll111i:lf:i_ll

Groundbreaking: January 1987
Finish date: September 1988
Construction time: 20 months

Total: $41,901,119
Building only: $33,500,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $2,000,000
Housing per inmate: $1,012
Housing per cell: $2,000
Total per inmate: $21,215
Total per GSF: $90.52
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $16,756,917

111111111Ulll&illltl111snuctura1: Steel frame, precast concrete
cells, load-bearing CMU block
Exterior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Exterior srnface or facade: Stucco, CMU
block, precast walls, colored metal roofs
Electronic technology systems: ccrv
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door control/
monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alann, satellite/cable

250

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 2,000
Dorms: 0
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 2,000
Current population: January 1993: 1,975

~,~~~~U41Si

~~,iir£~~~'}fulli~W./$;~Wffi,rnm%

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 100
Inmates per unit (design): 200
Inmates per unit (current): 200
Management type (design): Intermittent and
remote surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 3
Midnight: 3

litlii&llllell1111811

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Unknown
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast
exterior walls

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture: Unknown
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, double
fence, perimeter patrols and detection/
alann, razor wire on fence(s), video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 30%
Medium:70%
Minimum:0

~llEillllltlllfilJIIJII
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 10
Security: 376
Programs and treatment: 148
Maintenance: 31
Total:565
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.5:1
Contracted services: Unknown

-c-B~in.[@.i.~.•.·~
. /'.fo/~
±>"

@rA1$*.;n.·.1.,·.jj/:·:r·

1

,MW.~
~

'

~~J;g_Mt?iim~<$1il&~2o1tl-

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods, good competition
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
advanced order of materials
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Missouri
Cameron

I

.

®

►

II!
::,

I
\

I
I

l;-

u

==

::E 0

::, 0

Z5
w

..J

I&.

::& 0

.. z

~6

::, a::
C,

I
I
I

/
/

I

/

I
I

i,.

'

.

@

z

c.,

m

i

'

\

\

\

\

'·,

:,

:

~

\
\

.

·,.

'·,

'

·. ··.,\\s:--\
\:_

,,

.

···\
\
I
I
I

\
\
\

\

G

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

251

Ely State Prison Responsible official: Director, Nevada Department of Prisons

Contact: Chuck Wolff, Associate Warden, Ely State Prison, P.O. Box 1989, Ely, NV 89301, 702-289--8800
Architect: Ganthner, Melby, Lee Architects and Planners, 5190 Neil Road, #231, Reno, NV 89502, 702-829--8814
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 387,220
Total NSF: 348,498
Corrections GSF: 387,220
Corrections NSF: 348,498
Housing area GSF: 238,960
Housing area NSF: 215,064
GSFper inmate (design): 384
GSFperinmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): 346
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 86 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: 90%

Groundbreaking: August 1987
Finish date: December 1990
Construction time: 40 months

Total: $52,000,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $25,000,000
Housing per inmate: $24,802
Housing per cell: $31,888
Total per inmate: $51,587
Total per GSF: $134.29
Total per NSF: $149.21
Total annual operating costs: $14,000,000

lliJJIJ!ll!III[~. .
Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame, cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Stucco, natural
wall, CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, custom
control panels, satellite/cable

252

General population
Single occupancy: 576
Double occupancy: 384
Danns: 16
Special population
Single occupancy: 32
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Total design: 1,008
Current population: Unknown

~'111Rlt111(1fl
Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 96
Inmates per unit (design): 96
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown
~~~~Sfil'l:"TI®IJ'W

~,~~~~~M@1~i~
Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking, motor
driven and remote locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells
HVAC: Air-conditioning, heating/air
circulation
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit

~~-Wilii
---....... _.·
,.,J
~t.m:~

Perimeter: Double fence, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers, perimeter
patrols; costs included

Inmate security level
Maximum: 98%
Medium:O
Minimum:2%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: 0
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

~~•~*~~1!zl
~~~~
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive:· Simple construction methods
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, high labor costs, difficult
site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Coordination of design
Negative: Weather problems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Nevada
Ely

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

253

Cumberland County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Cumberland County

Contact: Captain Dennis Flukey, Undersheriff, Cwnberland County Jail, 54 West Broad Street, Bridgeton, NJ 08332, 609-451--8000
Architect: VitettaGroup, 642 North Broad Street, The Wallace Building, Philadelphia, PA 19130, 215-235-3500;
K.A. Parsons Associates, 605 Wagner Road, Studio I, Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2024, 215--828--4193
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: Unknown
Total NSF: 28,460
Corrections GSF: Unknown
Corrections NSF: 28,460
Housing area GSF: 17,024
Housing area NSF: 10,640
GSF per inmate (design): Unknown
GSFperimnate(current):Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): 285
NSF per inmate (current): 75
Size of cells: 70 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: January 1988
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $6,200,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $62,000
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: $217 .85
Total annual operating costs: $2,177,000

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels

General population
Single occupancy: 96
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 4
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 100
Current population: October 1992: 380

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 96
Inmates per unit (design): 96
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supetvision
Management type (current): Intennittent
surveillance, direct supetvision
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells, mattresses on floor
Total officers per unit
Day: 17
Evening: 17
Midnight: 15

1111Bllli1illltltlill1!4
Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds, State contribution
Use of inmate labor: Limited; painting and
site cleaning
Use of prefabrication: None

254

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging, sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete, vinyl tile,
tile in kitchen
futercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm
HYAC: Air-conditioning, steam heat
Plumbing: China, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance, razor wire on walls
in exercise yard; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximwn:4%
Mediwn:96%
Minimum:0%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 16
Security: 108
Programs and treatment: 6
· Maintenance: 1
Total: 131
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.9: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

l1Blfll!arlf~111
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition, good
contractor
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Advanced order of materials,
coordination of design
Negative: Weather problems, political
issues

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

New Jersey
Cumberland County

C:
Cll

0::
Ol
C:

"in

:::,
0

I

ro
u

·a.
~

C:
Cll

0::
2
lf.l
a3
>
Q)
_J
Q)

C:

·c

ro
N
N

Cl)

~
Ol
C:

·en
::::i
0

I

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

255

Federal Correctional Institution-Fairton
Responsible official: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Contact: :Michael Cooksey, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution-Fairton, P.O. Box 280, Highway 698, Fairton, NJ 08320,
609--4-53-1177
Architect: Vitetta Group, 642 North Broad Street, The Wallace Building, Philadelphia, PA 19130, 215-235-3500
Construction Manager: Morse Diesel, 120 Wood Avenue South, Suite 500, Iselin, NJ 08830, 908--494--1800

Total GSF: 340,000
Total NSF: 212,500
Corrections GSF: 340,000
Corrections NSF: 212,500
Housing area GSF: 105,000
Housing area NSF: 88,000
GSF per inmate (design): 340
GSF per inmate (current): 362
NSF per inmate (design): 213
NSF per inmate (current): 227
Size of cells: 80 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 62.5%

Groundbreaking: October 1987
Finish date: January 1990
Construction time: 27 months

Total: $50,700,000
Building only: $43,200,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $13,800,000
Housing per inmate: $14,375
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $50,700
Total per GSF: $149.11
Total per NSF: $238.59
Total annual operating costs: $18,200,000

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Staff
intercommunication, inmate in~rcom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, perimeter
detection/alarm

256

General population
Single occupancy: 960
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 40
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Total design: 1,000
Current population: February 1993: 938

Dlll?Bllll!flil~i111i1tk~1

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 120
Irunates per unit (design): 120
Irunates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
:Midnight: I

liall-~~-·

Door material(s): Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: One-way to cells
HV AC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard and bars

areas,

Perimeter: Double fence; costs included

Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
:Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 28
Security: 109
Programs and treatment: 42
Maintenance: 24
Total:203
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

-

Factors affecting construction costs

Positive: Simple construction methods, less
expensive materials
Negative: High labor costs; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, labor problems

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

New Jersey
Fairton

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

257

Monmouth County Correction Institution
Responsible official: Sheriff, Monmouth County

Contact: Clifford l Daniels, Warden, Monmouth County Correction Instiwtion, 1 Wateiworlcs Road, Freehold, NJ 07728, 908--431--6524
Architect: Grad Partnership, One Gateway Center, Newarlc, NJ 07102-5388, 201--621-1700
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 26,000
Total NSF: 18,600
Corrections GSF: 26,000
Corrections NSF: I 8,600
Housing area GSF: 26,000
Housing area NSF: 18,600
GSF per inmate (design): 102
GSF per inmate (current): 103
NSF per inmate (design): 73
NSFperinmate (current): 74
Size of cells: 80 (double)
Net/gross square feet: 72%

11111181111:allllPJtlil
Groundbreaking: March 1983
Finish date: October 1985
Construction time: 31 months

Total: $11,000,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost Higher
Housing area: $6,000,000
Housing per inmate: $23,438
Housing per cell: $46,875
Total per inmate: $42,968
Total perGSF: $423.08
Total per NSF: $591 .40
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Strucwral: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Drivit on concrete
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior surface or facade: Stucco
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alann

258

General popuJation
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 256
Dorms:O
Special popuJation
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 256
Current population: January 1992: 252

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 64
Inmates per unit (design): 128
Inmates per unit (current): 128
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Beds in
dayroom
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

---.~-

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floorsurface:Epoxycoating
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Air-conditioning, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniwre: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit and special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
· fence; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:O
Minimum:O

Full-time equivalent
Administration: l
Security: 30
Programs and treatment: 6
Maintenance: 2
Total:39
Current inmate/staffratio: 6.5: 1
Contracted services: Food

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State and local general
obligation bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

New Jersey
Monmouth County

-

~-!...LLLi
~F UJJJJJJ
_ _ J.-j--l.
_ _ _-lL
;,...

.

I

I~.

---~... ·mrr1 ~
----r_,I

r

i
•-;

~1
~

~,
---1~

t-

'

M-.---1

~im j
.

I

i

,<_

&

=

~1

I

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

259

Cattaraugus County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Cattaraugus County

Contact: Jeny E. Burrell, Sheriff, Cattaraugus County Jail, 301 Court Street, Little Valley, NY 14755, 716-938-9191
Architect: Habiterra Associates, 1279 North Main Street, P.O. Box 609, Jamestown, NY 14702--0609, 716--664-4710
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 57,821
Total NSF: 43,366
Corrections GSF: 33,536
Corrections NSF: 25,152
Housing area GSF: 30,258
Housing area NSF: 8,470
GSF per inmate (design): 438
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): 328
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 70 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 75%

matllllllllllt!Jrfll

Groundbreaking: June 1991
Finish date: April 1993
Construction time: 22 months

Total: $4,767,230
Building only: $4,651,330
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $2,791,000
Housing per inmate: $22,508
Housing per cell: $22,508
Total per inmate: $36,115
Total per GSF: $82.45
Total per NSF: $109.93
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

~~-&m4iliie~~=~=~~

<·": >:
Structural: Load-bearing CMU block

& 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .

0

~ · ~ - - -

Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
duress/fire alarm, door controVmonitoring,
custom control panels, satellite/cable

General population
Single occupancy: 124
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 8
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 132
Current population: Unknown

Dl111!3111L.V,Alllllt

Design: Mcxlular/pod
Cells per unit 12
Inmates per unit (design): 12
Inmates per unit (current): 12
Management type (design): Direct
supeIVision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Beds in
recreation room
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance methcxl: Local general obligation
bonds, fixed financing rate
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast
concrete plank

260

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Epoxy coating, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation only, gas
heat, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 58%
Medium:37%

Minimum:5%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

181

~,~'F~~

"?cl!

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition, less expensive
materials
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Coordination of design
Negative: Weather problems; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems

NJJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

New York
Cattaraugus County

MAXIMUM SECURITY

1

EXIST

ADDN

OUTDOOR
EXERCISE

EXISTING

ADDITION

MEDIUM SECURITY

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

261

Genesee County Jail
Responsible official: Genesee Sheriff, Genesee County

Contact: Robert Stevens, Chief Deputy, Genesee County Jail, 14 West Main Street., P.O. Box 151, Batavia, NY 14020--0I51,
716--343-0911
Architect: Habiterra, 1279 North Main Street P.O. Box 609, Jamestown, NY 14702, 716--664--4710
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 36,556
Total NSF: 26,837
Corrections GSF: 24,967
Corrections NSF: 18,725
Housing area GSF: 15,335
HousingareaNSF: 11,501
GSF per inmate (design): 555
GSF per inmate (current): 454
NSF per inmate (design): 416
NSFperinmate (current): 340
Size of cells: 42 (single), 360 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 73%

Groundbreaking: June 1984
Finish date: January 1987
Construction time: 30 months

Total: $3,500,000
Building only: 2,500,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $1,600,000
Housing per inmate: $35,555
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $95.74
Total per NSF: $130.42
Total annual operating costs: $1,212,279

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: ccrv
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, duress/fire alarm, door
controVmonitoring, satellite/cable

General population
Single occupancy: 30
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 12
Special population
Single occupancy: 3
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 45
Current population: January 1992: 55

IIIE1'1-1rlll1

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 3
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, beds in dayroom
Total officers per unit
Day:6
Evening: 6
Midnight: 4

Door material(s): Aluminum
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Epoxy coating
Intercom: One-way to common areas
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 71 %
Medium:29%
Minimum:O

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 2
Security: 21
Programs and treatment: 7
Maintenance: 3
Total:33
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1.7: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: General contractor went bankrupt

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds, fixed financing rate
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast
concrete plank flooring

262

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

New York
Genesee Cowity

RECREATION

MEDIUM
SECURITY

ADDITION
EXISTING

MAXIMUM
SECURITY

SHERIFF"$
DEPARTMENT

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

263

Metro Jefferson Public Safety Building
Responsible official: Sheriff, Jefferson County

Contact: Donald Newbeny, Sheriff, Metro Jefferson Public Safety Building, 753 City Center Drive West, Watertown, NY 13601,
315-786--2660
.
Architect: Robertson Strong Apgar Architects, 1054 James Street, Syracuse, NY 13203, 315--472-7761
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 115,800
Total NSF: 86,500
Corrections GSF: 68,600
Corrections NSF: 48,000
Housing area GSF: 43,700
Housing area NSF: 36,500
GSF per inmate (design): 379
GSF per inmate (current): 418
NSF per inmate (design): 265
NSF per inmate (current}: 293
Size of cells: 80 (single)
Nel/gross square feet: 75%

Groundbreaking: November 1989
Finish date: Febuacy 1992
Construction time: 26 months

Total: $14,000,000
Building only: $14,000,000
Final construction cost: Same
Housing area: $7,600,000
Housing per inmate: $46,341
Housing per cell: $46,341
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $120.90
Total per NSF: $161.85
Total annual operating costs: $1,373,935

Structural: Precast concrete plank on loadbearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior sUiface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, custom
controlpanels

264

General population
Single occupancy: I64
Double occupancy: 0
Danns: 0

Special population
Single occupancy: 17
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 181
Current population: January 1992: 164

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 32
fumates per unit (design): 32
fumates per unit (current): 32
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:7
Evening: 7
Midnight: 6

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild, multiple bid packages (fast track)
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Gas heat, forced air
Plumbing: China, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas, sprinklers for common
areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium: 100%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 8
Security: 52
Programs and treatment: 7
Maintenance: 4
Total:71
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.3: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); good
competition; less expensive materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Phased construction (fast track),
advanced order of materials, coordination
of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

New York
Jefferson County

z

0

~

i...

· (I)

w

>
:!

w

z

0

~

C

...a:
0

z

:I
Cl
C

CJ

w

2

:::i

:::i

z

~
z

60:z:
u w CJ
,:!~

~~I
OCJ 0

0

I

0

I=

•=...
en

all

l

0

d

I

B
d

'

C

8~

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

265

Saratoga County Law Enforcement Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Saratoga County

. Contact: James Bowen, Sheriff, Saratoga County Law Enforcement Center, 5010 County Fann Road, Ballston Spa, NY 12020,
518-885-5381
Architect: Rosser Justice Systems, 524 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta. GA 30308, 404-876-3800
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: Unknown
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 104,000
Corrections NSF: 64,000
Housing area GSF: 94,000
Housing area NSF: 54,000
GSF per inmate (design): 619
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): 381
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Sizeofcells:Unknown
Net/gross square feet: 62%

Groundbreaking: October 1986
Finish date: April 1988
Construction time: 19 months

Total: $10,000,000
Building only: $9,200,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $7,000,000
Housing per inmate: $41,667
Housing per cell: $41,667
Total per inmate: NIA
Total per GSF: $96.15
Total per NSF: $156.25
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

&.aWlilimllillllll
Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame, load-bearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: ElFS
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
interconnnunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels, perimeter detection/alann,
satellite/cable, metal detection, watch
tower system

266

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to connnon areas,
inmate duress alann, general paging
throughout
HVAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat, forced
air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and connnon areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

General population
Single occupancy: 168
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:O
Total design: 168
Current population: Unknown

Perimeter: Building exterior only, double
fence, perimeter detection/alarm; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 38%
Medium:62%
Minimum:0

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

--Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods, less
expensive materials
Negative: High labor costs
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Labor problems, weather
problems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

New York
Saratoga County

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

267

Duplin County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Duplin County

Contact: Jesse Scott, Sergeant, Duplin County Jail, P.O. Box 206, NC 11 South, Kenansville, NC 28349, 919--296--2150
Architect: Ron Webb (outofbusiness)
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 2,400
Total NSF: 2,400
Corrections GSF: 2,400
Corrections NSF: 2,400
Housing area GSF: 2,400
Housing area NSF: 2,400
GSF per inmate (design): 60
GSFperinmate(current}: 160
NSF per inmate (design): 60
NSF per inmate (current): 160
Size of cells: N/A
Net/gross square feet: N/A

Groundbreaking: September 1989
Finish date: March 1991
Construction time: 18 months

Total: $125,000
Building only: $125,000
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $3,125
Total per GSF: $52.08
Total per NSF: $52.08
Total annual operating costs: Unknown
~~M'~~'%"""'"""Mli111
~,a~mrtrAlli~
Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: Metal building
Interiorwalls:Metal,sheetrock
Electronic technology systems: Duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, perimeter
detection/alann

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:40
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 40
Current population: December 1992: 15

llllll!IUJitilllllllili■r~

Design: Dormitory
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 40
Inmates per unit (current): 15
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Tot.al officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Doormaterial(s): Unknown
Type(s) of doors: Unknown
Type(s) oflocks: Unknown
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: N/A
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for dorms and common areas
Windows: No bars -

Perimeter: Single fence, perimeter
detection/alarm, razor wire on fence(s);
costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:O
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 0
Security: 4
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 0
Total:4
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.8: I
Contracted services: None

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: N/A

lllllilltl\lllllafall~

Contract method: Turnkey design-build
Finance method: County tax
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

268

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

North Carolina
Duplin County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

269

Durham County Jail Annex
Responsible official: Sheriff, Durham County

Contact: Director Cote, Durham County Jail Annex, 300 East Main Street, Durham, NC 27701, 919-560--0010
Architect: O'Brien Atkins Associates, P.O. Box 12037, Research Triangle Park, NC 27700, 919-941-9000
Construction Manager: Davidson and Jones Construction, P.O. Box 19067, Raleigh, NC 27619, 919-828-6260

Total GSF: 42,()(X)
Total NSF: 40,()(X)
Corrections GSF: 42,()(X)
Corrections NSF: 40,()(X)
Housing area GSF: 38,()(X)
Housing area NSF: 36,800
GSF per inmate (design): 259
GSF per inmate (current): 359
NSF per inmate (design): 247
NSF per inmate (current): 342
Size of cells: 8,100 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 95%

lttiiil■IIIIIBlllll~iil

Groundbreaking: January 1990
Finish date: September 1990
Construction time: 9 months

Total: $2,300,()(X)
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $2,()(X),OCK)
Housing per inmate: $12,346
Housing per cell: $400,()(X)
Total per inmate: $14,198
Total per GSF: $54.76
Total per NSF: $57.50
Total annual operating costs: $3,265,430

-

Structural: Preexisting cast-in-place
concrete frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Stucco, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, duress/fire alann,
door controVmonitoring, custom control
panels, perimeter detection/alann

270

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 162
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 162
Current population: January 1992: 117

Design: Unknown
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 32
Inmates per unit (current): 32
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, mattresses on floor
Total officers per unit
Day: 18
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: 18

--•~--~l4'J

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote and manual
locking
Floor surface: Carpet
Intercom: Unknown
HVAC: Air-conditioning, heating, forced
air

Plumbing: China
Furniture: VinyVplastic
Fire protection: Unknown
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: Unknown
Medium: Unknown
Minimum: Unknown

Full-time equivalent
Achninistration: 4
Security: 151
Programs and treatment: 7
Maintenance: 1
Total: 163
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1: 1
Contracted services: Medical, food

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: NIA
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations, site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction; coordination of
design
Negative: NIA

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Emergency mandate
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

North Carolina
Durham County

....____

i

.,..;

--------

y·-

-I \

I

I

(

I
I

;s
'

,_

:~

:

..

, I

'

I

I

:~
l ;

j

~. ·-·
r ....
I

i

L

1M

,-

'.J

~

u

I

!

NJJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

271

Wake County Public Safety Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Wake County

Contact: John H. Baker, Jr., Sheriff, Wake County Public Safety Center, Salsbury Street., Raleigh, NC 270J2, 919-856--6900
Architect: O'Brien Atkins Associates,P.O. Box 12037, Re.5eaICh Triangle Park, NC 277W, 919-941-9000
Construction Manager: Davidson and Jones, P.O. Box 19067, Raleigh, NC 27619

Total GSF: 231,060
Total NSF: 176,500
Corrections GSF: 195,600
Corrections NSF: 110,000
Housing area GSF: 114,720
Housing area NSF: 67,860
GSF per inmate (design): 408
GSF per inmate (current): 394
NSF per inmate (design): 229
NSF per inmate (current): 221
Sireofcells: 70(single)
Net/gross square feet: 76%

Groundbreaking: NIA
Finish date: July 1991
Construction time: 42 months

Total: $56,000,000
Building only: $41,000,000
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $242.36
Total per NSF: $317.28
Total annual operating costs: $8,000,000

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Textured
concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door controVmonitoring, card
access, custom control panels, satellite/
cable

-

General population
Single occupancy: 456
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 24
Double occupancy: 0

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Forced air
Plwnbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and .
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximwn: 100%
Medium:0
Minimwn:0

Donns:O

Total design: 480
Current population: January 1993: 497

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 24
Inmates per unit (design): 24
Inmates per unit (current): 24
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, mattresses on floor
Total officers per unit
Day:4
Evening: 3
Midnight: 3

llllrlll
Contract method: Multiple bid packages

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 4
Security: 185
Programs and treatment: 28
Maintenance: 2
Total:219
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.3: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: N/A

(fast track)
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds

Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

272

NJJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

North Carolina
Wake County

.

•

•
Doy

-- -- --· ·---- ----·· --- -- ..... ~- ·-. -----· ..... --- ..... .

l

•

•

Room

•••

I

·•.

'-·\··

··.·.,

OutdoOI"
Exerc:lse

/

i

Do, Room

•

•

Ooy

i -- ---·. ----•.......... ··-· .........
•.

1

~

...... p•--• .. •• ••• ••••• •••••••• ••~ ■ •••••,ii

Typical Housing
East Fifth-Ninth Levels
~
0

I 4

Room

Floor Plan

~
t

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

32
----•

,e

273

Grafton Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Contact: Carl Anderson, Warden, Grafton Correctional Institution, 2500 South Avon Belden Road, Grafton; OH 44044, 216-748-1161
Architect: Robert P. Madison International, 2930 Euclid Avenue, Oeveland, OH 44115, 216-861--8195
Construction Manager: Heery/Ozanne, 1635 East 25th Street, Oeveland, OH 44114, 216--696-2876

Total GSF: 285,404
Total NSF: 228,370
Corrections GSF: 285,404
Corrections NSF: 228,370
Housing area GSF: 116,480
Housing area NSF: 93,844
GSFperinmate (design): 540
GSF per inmate (current): 294
NSF per inmate (design): 432
NSF per inmate (current): 235
Size of cells: 75 (single)
Net/gross square feet 80%

Groundbreaking:Mayl986
Finish date: October 1988
Construction time: 29 months

Total: $30,000,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $12,000,000
Housing per inmate: $24,194
Housing per cell: $22,727
Total per inmate: $56,818
TotalperGSF: $105.11
Total per NSF: $131.37
Total annual operating costs: $13,500,000

Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing
masonry
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick, metal
roofing
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels, perimeter
detection/alarm, satellite/cable

274

General population
Single occupancy: 496
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 32
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 528
Current population: December 1992: 1,100

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 124
Inmates per unit (design): 124
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells, mattresses in gymnasium
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

-

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Capital Improvement
State House Bill 530
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Unknown
Floor surface: Carpet, sealed concrete, vinyl
tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas, inmate duress alann
HVAC: Gas heat, forced air
Plumbing: China, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel, wood, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard and bars, security
screens

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), video camera
surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium: I 00%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 63
Security: 157
Programs and treatment: 27
Maintenance: 33
Total: 280
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.9: I
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: NIA
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: NIA

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Ohio
Grafton

~

'
/1

'\ I
'

f
I

\

''

'

'
'

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

275

Lorain Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Contact: Teny Collins, Warden, Lorain Correctional Institution, 2075 South Avon Belden Road, Grafton, OH44044, 216--748--1049
Architect: Richard Bowen and Associates, Incorporated, 13000 Shaker Boulevard, Oeveland, OH 44120, 216--491-9300
Construction Manager: Turner Construction, 100 ErieviewTower, Cleveland, OH 44114, 216--522-1180

-- "4.W

Total GSF: 348,430
Total NSF: 197,200
Corrections GSF: 348,430
Corrections NSF: 197,200
Housing area GSF: 182,286
Housing area NSF: 107,682
GSF per inmate (design): 173
GSF per inmate (current): 176
NSF per inmate (design): 98
NSFperinmate(current): 100
Size of cells: 35 (double)
Net/gross square feet: 57%

Eiillaiiul!~ilJIIIIJ

Groundbreaking: April 1987
Finish date: April 1990
Construction time: 36 months

Total: $40,000,000
Building only: $31,000,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $18,226,123
Housing per inmate: $9,256
Housing per cell: $24,301
Total per inmate: $19,860
Total per GSF: $114.80
Total per NSF: $202.84
Total annual operating costs: $14,639,193

Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing precast
columns, cast concrete
Exterior walls: Concrete block with brick
overlay
Interior walls: Precast columns, concrete
block
Exterior swface or facade: Brick, stucco
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door control/
monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alann, satellite/cable

276

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 1,969
Donns:O
Special population
Single occupancy: 9
Double occupancy: 36
Dorms: 0
Total design: 2,014
Current population: December 1991: 1,976

IIBtJl■JllilillllJlllilli

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 124
Inmates per unit (design): 248
Inmates per unit (current): 248
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, bunk beds in cells, beds in
dayroom
Total officers per unit
Day:4
Evening:4
Midnight: 4

ll!ll'IDJIIIBli!tllllli

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Unknown
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: No intercom system
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, gas heat
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Sprinklers for cells and
common areas
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), video camera
surveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 11 %
Medium:75%
Minimum: 6%
Short-tenn holds and medical: 8%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 44
Security: 171
Programs and treatment: 42
Maintenance: 14
Total: 271
Current inmate/staff ratio: 7 .3: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track)
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, high labor costs,
government procedures and regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); advanced
order of materials; coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, labor problems, weather
problems, government procedures and
regulations, obsolete materials, wmk done
out of order

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Ohio
Grafton

- ..
. .

.

.

·.

... --:-..

J1
..-

;_~: ••. •.. .......••.. =~11
'\ +: -· ·
- '_ _:~~:-t\ F<; --:·, -:-~·£::;n;:o'o-:-, "-. ~ ::~~I
._ ·: \ . - >~----itlJ ~: :- ~: _:_: '.
D

i,1,

f

·

•

·

·

1

1

~-----.

-- -- ----~----,.._ ______ _
.

. . . . .

..

·-

. ..

........

---+___

-+••-L, _________ ,__

- - - - · - · .... "{>,--

-

-~--

------+--•

•

·-·---ll ~--

►-1 1.1·DiJ

f

.

-I

l
I
I

•l'

,·E;;lj=="ll

l(

t~

:-__ 8

I.

.

I'

1 ' a....-

-------------.
1,

~-

I _ ~-

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

'r-

----.

____ _,,:

i"
-_I

~

ik-~l

Ij

~

277

Northwest Ohio Regional Jail
Responsible official: Director, Corrections Commission of Northwest Ohio, William County

Contact: Jim Dennis, Executive Director, Northwest Ohio Regional Jail, 03151 Road 24.25, Route 1, Box 100-A, Snyker, OH 43557,
419--428---3800
Architect: Rosser Justice Systems, 524 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30308, 404--876--3800
Construction Manager: Unknown

Total GSF: 178,000
Total NSF: 115,000
Corrections GSF: 178,000
Corrections NSF: 115,000
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 350
GSF per inmate (current): 390
NSF per inmate (design): 226
NSF per inmate (current): 252
Siz.e of cells: 80 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 65%

Groundbreaking: July 1988
Finish date: November 1990
Construction time: 30 months

Total: $15,000,000
Building only: $14,300,000
Final construction cost Higher
Housing area: $9,700,000
Housing per inmate: $20,464
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $29,528
Total per GSF: $84.27
Total per NSF: $130.43
Total annual operating costs: $9,326,109

IJillllill•llllllllJllll!¼fl

Structural: Steel frame, cast-in-place
concrete frame, modular metal cells, loadbearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels, satellite/cable, remote
arraignment court, metal detection, watch
tower system

278

General population
Single occupancy: 174
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 300
Special population
Single occupancy: 14
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 20
Total design: 508
Current population: April 1993: 456

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): 45
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Administrative
release
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Cost shared by local
jurisdictions
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; hollow-core
floor and ceiling panels

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: General paging throughout
HVAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat,
forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Single fence, razor wire on
fence(s), video camera surveillance; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 10%
Medium:26%
Minimum: 64%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 8
Security: 126
Programs and treatment: 29
Maintenance: 5
Total: 168
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.7: 1
Contracted services: Medical, mental health

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative:Highlaborcosts
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track)
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, weather problems

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Ohio
William County

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

279

Warren Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Contact: Anthony Brigano, Warden, Warren Correctional Institution, 5787 State Route 63, P.O. Box 120, Lebanon, OH 45036,
513--932-3388
Architect: Lorenz & Williams, Inc., 120 West Third Street, Dayton, OH 45402-1819, 513--223--6500
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 396,795
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 396,795
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 192,381
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 511
GSF per inmate (cwrent): 284
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (cwrent): Unknown
Siz.e of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Groundbreaking: July 1986
Finish date: August 1989
Construction time: 37 months

Total: $33,067,000
Building only: $28,504,095
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $14,465,259
Housing per inmate: $20,724
Housing per cell: $24,110
Total per inmate: $42,612
Total per GSF: $83.34
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $13,649,879

Structural: Precast concrete frame, CMU
block (walls) P.C.C. (floors)
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, staff intercommunication,
duress/fire alarm, door control/monitoring

General population
Single occupancy: 598
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 100
Special population
Single occupancy: 78
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:O
Total design: 776
Current population: March 1993: 1,399

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 62
Inmates per unit (design): 62
Inmates per unit (cwrent): 124
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Multiple prime contracts
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast
concrete floors, roofs

280

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
. Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking, manual locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Inmate duress alann
HVAC: Heating/air circulation only, gas
.heat

Plumbing: Stainless steel, china
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Standard and bars

-

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on
fence(s); costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:3%
Medium:3%
Minimum: 10%
Close security: 84%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 52
Security: 172
Programs and treatment: 36
Maintenance: 23
Total:283
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4.9: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, high labor costs
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Ohio
Lebanon

••
-

••

•

♦

•

... . ••
.

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

.

281

Federal Correctional Institution-Sheridan
Responsible official: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Contact: Joe Crabtree, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution-Sheridan, P.O. Box 5001, 27fJ72 Ballston Road, Sheridan, OR 97378,
503-M3-4442
Architect: Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Partnership, 1191 Second Avenue, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98101, 206--623--9414
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 471,789
Total NSF: 322,414
Corrections GSF: 471,789
Corrections NSF: 322,414
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 359
GSF per inmate (current): 266
NSF per inmate (design): 245
NSF per inmate (current): 182
Size of cells: 77 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet 68%

Doormaterial(s): Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: N/A
HVAC: Air-conditioning, gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas, sprinklers for common
areas, manual alann stations
Windows: Standard and bars
·0-,,'.

~~ma_'c, ~~

-

Groundbreaking: August 1987
Finish date: June 1989
Construction time: 24 months

Total: 51,400,000
Building only: 42,700,000
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: $16,602,989
Housing per inmate: 13,094
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: 39,058
Total per GSF: 108.95
Total per NSF: 159.42
Total annual operating costs: 19,500,000

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: Natural wall,
CMU block, metal panels, wood
Electronic technology systems: Paging and
SOWld system, duress/fire alarm, door
controVmonitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alann

282

General population
Single occupancy: 256 .
Double occupancy: 512
Donns: 500
Special population
Single occupancy: 48
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Totaldesign: 1,316
Current population: May 1993: 1,773

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 128
Inmates per unit (design): 192
Inmates per unit (current): 317
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: BWlk beds in
cells, transfer to another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening:2
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; precast
concrete, inmate cells

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alann, razor wire on and
between fence(s), video camera
surveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:75%
Minimum: 25%

Full.time equivalent
Administration: 45
Security: 129
Programs and treatment: 136
Maintenance: 25
Total:335
Current inmate/staff ratio: 5.3: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, less expensive materials
Negative:Highlaborcosts
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track)
Negative: Weather problems; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Oregon
Sheridan

0

IO

IO

N

....0
0

...
Q
Q

ti:
~

;:
Q

~

~

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

283

Marion County Corrections Facility
Responsible official: Director, Marion County Department of Corrections

Contact: Bill Wasson, Director, Marion County Conections Facility, 3950 Aumsville Highway, Salem, OR 97301, 503-588--8417
Architect: Lescher & Mahoney/DLR Group, 2141 East Camelback Road, Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ 85016, 602-381--8580
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 115,465
Total NSF: 80,825
Conections GSF: 85,964
Conections NSF: 60,174
Housing area GSF: 73,000
Housing area NSF: 51,125
GSFper inmate (design): 451
GSFper inmate (current}: 391
NSF per inmate (design): 316
NSF per inmate (current): 294
Siz.e of cells: 75 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 70%

Door material(s}: Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm
HVAC: Steam heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Slit

Groundbreaking: September 1987
Finish date: January 1988
Construction time: 4 months

Total: $11,287,000
Building only: $11,177,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $7,400,000
Housing per inmate: $35,577
Housing per cell: $35,577
Total per inmate: NIA
Total per GSF: $97.75
Total per NSF: $139.65
Total annual operating costs: $6,800,000

Structural: Load-bearing masonry with
precast roof
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, CMU
block split face
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door control/monitoring, custom
control panels

284

General population
Single occupancy: 208
Double occupancy: 0
Donns: 0
Special population
Single occupancy: 48
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 256
Cwrent population: February 1993: 295

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 12
Inmates per unit (design): 12
Inmates per unit (current}: Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current}: Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Adjust release
policies
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

-

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 14%
Medium:86%
Minimum:O

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 16
Security: 70
Programs and treatment: 12
Maintenance: 2
Total: 100
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: High labor costs
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, labor problems

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Oregon
Marion County

z

:5
a..
cc

8
•

.

~

(

:

'

'
:r

-,

., .

~

~

en
cc

u::

g

~·~
_.:,

-.

0.
NIJ/ National Directory of Corrections Construction

285

Bucks County Rehabilitation Center
Responsible official: Commissioners, Bucks County Prison Board

Contact: J. Allen Nesbitt, Director, Bucks County Department of Corrections, Bucks County Rehabilitation Center, 1730 South Easton
Road, Doylestown, PA 18901, 215-345-3702
Architect: Vitetta Group, 642 North Broad Street, The Wallace Building, Philadelphia, PA 19130, 215-345-3500
Construction Manager: O'Donnell and Maccarato, Inc., 9 West Court Street, Doylestown, PA 18901, 215-340-2420

Total GSF: 62,230
Total NSF: 49,784
Corrections GSF: 62,230
Corrections NSF: 49,784
Housing area GSF: 34,861
Housing area NSF: 20,916
GSF per inmate (design): 230
GSF per inmate (current): 244
NSF per inmate (design): 184
NSFperinmate (current): 195
Size of cells: 123 (double)
Net/gross square feet 80%

llfmWl•ll;jji!itiM,;ili&~~~~
Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: July 1991
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $4,525,050
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Totalperinmate: $16,636
TotalperGSF: $72.71
Total per NSF: $90.89
Total annual operating costs: $3,247,702

Structural: Load-bearing CMU block
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: Paging and
sound system

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 270
Dorms: 0
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 272
Current population: December 1991: 255

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: NIA
Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: l
Midnight: 1

Door material(s): Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Roor surface: Carpet, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Wood, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Custom hollow metal and
security glass

Perimeter: Building exterior only, perimeter
detection/alarm; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 95%
Disciplinary: 5%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 9
Security: 32
Programs and treatment: 12
Maintenance: 7
Total:60
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4.3: 1
Contracted services: Medical, mental health
services, educational instructors

IIIIIBllli

■

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: NIA
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; roof,
decks, precast planks

286

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Pennsylvania
Bucks County

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

287

Federal Correctional Institution-McKean
Responsible official: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Contact: Dennis M. Luther, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution-McKean, P.O. Box 5000, Bradford, PA 16701--0950,
814-362-8900
Architect: Geddes, Brecher, Qualls, Cunningham, 2401 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, 215-561-2401
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 492,505
Total NSF: 307,000
Corrections GSF: 492,505
Corrections NSF: 307,000
Housing area GSF: 145,000
Housing area NSF: 87,7(fJ
GSF per inmate (design): 474
GSFperinmate (current): 439
NSF per inmate (design): 295
NSF per inmate (current): 273
Size of cells: 77 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 62%

lllllllJIJ:11111111\lllll
Groundbreaking: June 1987
Finish date: October 1989
Construction time: 25 months

Total: $50,300,000
Building only: $43,000,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $15,000,000
Housing per inmate: $15,121
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $48,365
TotalperGSF: $102.13
Total per NSF: $163.84
Total annual operating costs: $18,900,000

Bllllll1!1111
Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Natural wall,
CMUblock
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring, perimeter detection/alann,
satellite/cable

288

General population
Single occupancy: 248
Double occupancy: 496
Donns: 248
Special population
Single occupancy: 48
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 1,040
Current population: April 1993: 1,123

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 124
Inmates per unit (design): 124
fumates per unit (current): 248
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: N/A
HVAC: Air-conditioning, M1HW central
boiler
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common areas, manual alarm stations,
smoke detectors in ducts
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on arid
between fence(s); costs excluded
Inmate security level
Administrative: 0
High:5%
Medium:70%
Low:24.4%
Minimum: .6%

i1lili~filmffi-11fo-"',
,.t<J@~~
©;,J'i,~•-~~-~~J%

C

(

~~-

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 14
Security: 124
Programs and treatment: 184
Maintenance: 27
Total: 349
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.2: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Phased construction (fast track),
good competition
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: Labor problems, weather
problems

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Pennsylvania
Bradford

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

289

Federal Correctional Institution-Schuylkill
Responsible official: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Contact: George C. Wigen, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution-Schuylkill, P.O. Box 700, Minersville, PA 17954, 717-544--7100
Architect: Benatec Associates, 101 Erford.Road, Camp Hill, PA 17011--8866, 717-763-7391
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 424,300
Total NSF: 265,000
Corrections GSF: 399,411
Corrections NSF: 265,000
Housing area GSF: 120,976
Housing area NSF: 87,760
GSF per inmate (design): 390
GSF per inmate (current): 293
NSF per inmate (design): 243
NSF per inmate (current): 183
Size of cells: 78 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 62.5%

_

Groundbreaking:Junel989
Finish date: April 1991
Construction time: 23 months

Total: $53,904,873
Building only: $44,500,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $22,800,000
Housing per inmate: $20,000
Housing per cell: $40,000
Total per inmate: $43,612
Total perGSF: $127.04
Total per NSF: $203.41
Total annual operating costs: $16,300,000

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior swface or facade: Natural wall,
CMU block, metal panel siding
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
. monitoring, perimeter detection/alarm,
satellite/cable

290

.....

General population
Single occupancy: 248
Double occupancy: 496
Donns:296
Special population
Single occupancy: 48
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 1,088
Current population: May 1993: 1,448

Door material(s): Wood
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor swface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: No intercom system
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, M1HW
central boiler plant
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common areas, smoke detectors in ducts
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alann, razor wire on and
between fence(s); costs excluded
Inmate security level
High: 2%
Medium:52%
Low:25%
Minimum: 21%

---~~1'fflffl--~~-·.
i!!fflllBffllwRH!llliim.WmimlliIIDL~~

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 124
Inmates per unit (design}: 186
Inmates per unit (current): 248
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

-

>

..

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 45
Security: 129
Programs and treatment: 136
Maintenance: 25
Total: 335
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3.2: 1
Contracted services: NIA

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Phased construction (fast track)
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Phased construction (fast track)
Negative: Weather problems

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

· .Pennsylvania
Minersville

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

291

Philadelphia Industrial Correctional Center
Responsible official: Commissioner, Philadelphia Prison System

Contact: Thomas Shields, Warden, Philadelphia Industrial Correctional Center, 8301 State Road, Philadelphia, PA 19136, 215-335-7104Architect: Jacobs, Wyner, Ehrenfrantz, 1232 Chancellor Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, 215-985-0900
Construction Manager: Monison-Knudsen Parametric Co., P.O. Box 7808, Boise ID, 83729, 208-386--5000

Total GSF: 280,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 280,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 126,020
Housing area NSF: 79,586
GSF per inmate (design): 431
GSFperinmate (current): 316
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 70 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

IIIIBB!Bilrtllll
Groundbreaking: July 1984
Finish date: June 1986
Construction time: 24 months

Total: $46,000,000
Building only: $44,500,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $70,769
TotalperGSF: $164.28
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural:Steelfrarne
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, CMU
block
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door controVmonitoring, custom
control panels, perimeter detection/alann,
satellite/cable

292

General population
Single occupancy: 600
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 50
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 650
Current population: January 1992: 885

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 50
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): 70
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
permanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 1

tlEllll

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild, multiple bid packages (fast track)
Finance method:Lease-purchase through
municipal authority via sale bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Carpet, sealed concrete, vinyl
tile
Intercom: One-way to common areas,
inmate duress alann
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Wood, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, double
fence, razor wire on fence(s), perimeter
patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 61 %
Medium:39%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 9
Security: 290
Programs and treatment: 47
Maintenance: .19
Total:365
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.4: 1
Contracted services: Medical, equipment
service contracts
mI:~¥iI~~~~~:,rJ,\!!&WBftF'

~~:t~-~~9~~
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple const methods, phased
const (fast track); less expensive materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions; gov.
procedures/regulations; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track);
coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

c=
,----r--,,,;✓.,,

i
''

:

--

7
1

7

-----

-------

, .,,.

GROUNO FLOOR

1. Entrance/visitor registration
2. Gym

3. Kitchen

4. Intake

t6
v)

SECOND FLOOR

5.
G.
7.
8.

Housing unit
Management unit
Recreation
Industry/shop area

9. Infirmary
10. Administration

State Correctional Institution at Waymart
Responsible official: Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

Contact: Charles H. Zimmennan, Superintendent:, State Correctional Institution at Waymart, Route 6, P.O. Box 256, Waymart, PA 18472,
717-488-2500
Architect: Multiple
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 492,206
Total NSF: 435,045
Corrections GSF: 492,206
Corrections NSF: 435,045
Housing area GSF: 200,708
Housing area NSF: 121,320
GSFper inmate (design): 480
GSFperinmate (current): 484
NSF per inmate (design): 424
NSF per inmate (current): 428
Size of cells: 95 (single and double)
Nel/gross square feet: 88%

ltJlll1ltlfllLWi!llllllllllJ

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: October I989
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $14,000,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $13,658
Total per GSF: $28.44
Total per NSF: $32.18
Total annual operating costs: $30,837,000

Structural: Modular metal cells
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, brick
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
srnveillance, staff intercommunication,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, perimeter detection/alann, satellite/
cable

General population
Single occupancy: 8
Double occupancy: 160
Dorms: 823
Special population
Single occupancy: 14
Double occupancy: 20
Donns:0
Total design: 1,025
Currentpopulation:April 1993: 1,017

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls and
building interior
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Intermittent
swveillance, direct supervision
Managementtype(current):Intennittent
srnveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells, beds in dayroom
Total officers per unit
Day: 15
Evening: 15
Midnight 13

w"·~?iff)
Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Fixed financing rate
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate;
prefabrication of some units

294

Door material(s): Wood, steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor surface: Lino/sheet vinyl, epoxy
coating, sealed concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Steam heat:, forced air, electric heat
pumps, air-conditioning
Plumbing: Stainless steel, china, stainless
steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel, wood
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for common areas, manual
alann stations
Windows: Standard and bars, special
security and screens

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, perimeter patrols and detection/
alann, razor wire on fence(s), video
camera srnveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximwn:4%
Medium:20%
Minimum: 76%

......,.,.....
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 48
Security: 196
Programs and treatment: 48
Maintenance: 63
Total:355
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.9: 1
Contracted services: Medical

IJiill\\:41

II

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, difficult site conditions,
quality of materials
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Coordination of design ·
Negative: N/A

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

01 l\l'MIN BLDG

12 PROPERTY RCX:M

02 CXNI'OOL

13 STORE RCX:M
14 MAIN KITCHEN
15 FSH VISITIOO RCCM

03. OPERATIONS

04 TREA'IMENT
05 A-BLOCK

06 B-BLCCK
07 C-BLOCK
08 D-BLOCK
09 AUDITORitJ-1
10 K-3 DINil'l3 HALL
11 STAFF D!Nlr«; Hl'\LL

16 LAUNDRY

17 GYM
18 E-BLCCK
19 MEDICAL

20 J-BLCCK
21 F-BUX:K
22 G-BUX:K
23 FSH DINI1'G M:JDULE
24 R.H.U.
25 EDOCATIOO BLDG (sarrH)

26 EDUCATIOO BLOO (001ml)

27 FSH l\l'MIN BLOO
28 FSH Q WARD
29 FSH M WARD
0 FSH BB WARD

31 GARAGE
32
33
34
37

GRCUNDS SHOP
R/R STATION
Z BLDG { Uto::CUPIED)
rolERHOUSE

38 SALLY PORT GATE HOOSE
HAIN EXEOCISE YARD

York County Prison
Responsible official: President, York County Commissioners

Contact: Richard J. Hahn, Warden, York County Prison, 3400 Concord Road, York, PA 17402, 717-771-9599
Architect: BASCO Associates, 611 West Market Street, York, PA 17404, 717-843--3854
Construction Manager: Quandel, 4309 Lingelstown Road, Suite 114, Hanisburg, PA 17112, 717--657--0909

Total GSF: 146,100
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 146,100
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 235
GSF per inmate (current): 239
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 70 (single), 100 (double)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Groundbreaking: November 1990
Finish date: October 1992
Construction time: 23 months

Total: $16,085,105
Building only: $15,453,746
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $25,860
Total per GSF: $110.10
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $6,600,000

Structural: Steel frame, precast plank on
load-bearing masonry
Exterior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Textured
concrete, CMU block
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring, custom control panels,
satellite/cable

296

General population
Single occupancy: %
Double occupancy: 328
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 30
Double occupancy: 24
Dorms: 144
Total design: 622
Current population: March 1992: 612

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 32
Inmates per unit (design): 64
Inmates per unit (current): 100
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Beds in
dayroom, second bunk permanently
attached

Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 3
Midnight: 3

-

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; precast roof
plank, concrete floor and wall panels

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking, manual locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas,
inmate duress alarm
HVAC: Gas heat, forced air
Plumbing: China, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for common areas, manual
alarm stations
Windows: Special security

-

Perimeter: Double fence, raz.or wire on
fence(s), perimeter patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 54%
Medium:23%
Minimum: 23%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 11
Security: 179
Programs and treatment: 12
Maintenance: 10
Total:212
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.9: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, special security needed to
keep part of facility operational
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track);
coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, special security needed to
keep part of facility operational

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Pennsylvania
York County

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

297

Bee County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Bee County

Contact: Robert L. Hom, Sheriff, Bee County Jail, 407 Hillside Drive, Beeville, TX 78102-5300, 512-362-3221
Architect: Di Stefano/Santopetro Architects, Inc., 10260 Westheimer, Suite 390, Houston, TX 77042, 713--953--9032
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 28,800
Total NSF: 23,600
Corrections GSF: 22,000
Corrections NSF: 18,000
Housing area GSF: 22,000
Housing area NSF: 18,000
GSFperinmate (design): 172
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): 141
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 58.5 (single), 520 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet 82%

Groundbreaking: June 1988
Finish date: July 1989
Construction time: 13 months

Total: $2,660,000
Building only: $2,575,000
Final construction cost Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $92.36
Total per NSF: $112.71
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
concrete colunms and steel beams
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: CMU block, steel plate
Exterior swface or facade: Textured
concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
duress/fire alarm, door control/monitoring

298

--General population
Single occupancy: 34
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:48
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:44
Total design: 128
Current population: Unknown

Design: Linear, cells on building interior
Cells per unit Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Intermittent and
remote surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight Unknown

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Fmance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor swface: Epoxy coating, sealed
concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HYAC: Eleclric
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas
Windows: Unknown

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 28%
Medium:38%
Minimum: 34%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

:·m.·

-

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time; complex electronic,
mechanical, and eleclrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: NIA
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, labor problems, weather
problems

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

~

~

....~
~·

-~·

el-tctri-,col

t:i

.·•·,.

("l

3,Q.,

i

·:?,_,/

··:···
!IDlly patl

'~rii1'l

·... ,.

i,~·,, ..
\

\

::\.

~-

("')
0

;:! .

~
s::

tN:1lt1l11119 room

::\.

§'

trotil •n1,y

tJ;;I

~

'-0

8 ~
(j 4.'C>
g ~

~

e;

Caldwell County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Caldwell County

Contact: Dian Bolton, Jail Administrator, Caldwell County Jail, 202 East San Antonio Street, P.O. Box 422, Lockhart, TX 78644,
512-398-4343
Architect: Di Stefano/Santopetro Architects, 10260 Westheimer, Suite 390, Houston, TX77042, 713--953--9032
Construction Manager: N/A

'

Total GSF: 32,500
Total NSF: 31,000
Corrections GSF: 24,500
Corrections NSF: 23,000
Housing area GSF: 24,500
Housing area NSF: 23,000
GSF per inmate (design): 220
GSFperinmate(current): 175
NSF per inmate (design): 209
NSF per inmate (current): 164
Size of cells: 58.5 (single), 492 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 95%

Groundbreaking: April 1989
Finish date: September 1990
Construction time: 17 months

Total: $3,000,000
Building only: $2,860,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $92.31
Total per NSF: $96.77
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
concrete colwnns and steel beams
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: CMU block, steel plate
Exterior surface or facade: Paint, textured
concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
duress/fire alann, door controVmonitoring

300

General population
Single occupancy: 50
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:48
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:48
Total design: 148
Current population: April 1993: 140
mf'Allilfflitit'l/=l~,mf'BWJi[g!ll!lltlfll

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¾ ' i : 4 f i l @ L ,,-@h&!b

Design: Linear, cells on building interior
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 48
Inmates per unit (current): 48
Management type (design): Intermittent and
remote surveillance
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

'

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, electric
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas
Windows: Unknown

r,~---·
~~-,'~\rn°_~,:

.~l

,

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 35%
Medium:33%
Minimum: 32%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, weather problems,
government procedures and regulations

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Texas
Caldwell County

------.,..~, . ..._

1

!

8IDmm
1----tt--t--11-' · ~

BJfil]ffl

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

301

Federal Correctional Institution-Three Rivers
Responsible official: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Contact: Philip Spears, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution-Three Rivers, P.O. Box 4000, Three Rivers, TX 78071, 512-786-3576
Architect: Helhnuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc., 6688 North Central Expressway, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75206, 214-739--6688
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 471,789
Total NSF: 322,414
Corrections GSF: 471,789
Corrections NSF: 322,414
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate (design}: 443
GSF per inmate (current): 312
NSF per inmate (design}: 302
NSF per inmate (current): 213
Size of cells: 77 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: 68%

~l,w-~·.
;;;;w~v-;
~LI~

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: June 1990
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $54,800,000
Building only: $46,000,000

Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $14,700,000
Housing per inmate: $14,440
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $51,407
TotalperGSF: $116.15
Total per NSF: $169.97
Total annual operating costs: $17,300,000

------11111111
Structural: Steel frame, precast
concrete
cells
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: Precast panels, CMU block
Exterior smface or facade: Stucco, CMU
block
Electtonic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alarm, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels, perimeter
detection/alarm, satellite/cable

302

~ ~

·_ ,"

r.•···, ' ,.

.. . · ~ ·pi •

General population
Single occupancy: 256
Double occupancy: 512
Dorms: 250
Special population
Single occupancy: 48
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 1,066
Current population: May 1993: 1,513

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 128
Inmates per unit (design): 192
Inmates per unit (current): 292
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, bunk beds in cells
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild

Finance method: Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Moderate; cells
prefabricated

-

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor smface: Vinyl tile
·
Intercom: N/A
HYAC: Gas heat, forced air
Plumbing: China, stainless steel
combination unit in special housing
Furniture: Steel, wood, vinyl/plastic
Fireprotection:Sprinklers
Windows: Standard and bars

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alann, razor wire on and
between fence(s), video camera
surveillance; costs excluded

Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium:80%
Minimum: 20%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 45
Security: 129
Programs and treatment: 136
Maintenance: 25
Total:335

Cmrent inmate/staff ratio: 4.5: 1
Contracted services: Unknown

-

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefab components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); good competition
Negative: Slow construction; high labor costs;
difficult site conditions; complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefab components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials;
coordination of design
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier; labor problems; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Texas
Three Rivers

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

303

Frio County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Frio County

Contact: Gabriel DelToro Jr., Sheriff, Frio County Jail, 505 Cedar Street (at Leona Street), Pearsall, TX 78061, 512-334-3311
Architect: Di Stefano/Santopetro Architects, Inc., 10260 Westheimer, #390, Houston, TX 77042, 713-953-9032
Construction Manager: N/A

,,
Total GSF: 40,000
Total NSF: 35,700
Corrections GSF: 30,000
Corrections NSF: 27,000
Housing area GSF: 30,000
Housing area NSF: 27,000
GSF per inmate (design): 176
GSF per inmate (cwrent): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): 159
NSF per inmate (cwrent): Unknown
Siz.e of cells: 58.5 (single), 383.5 (double),
1,424.5 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 89%

Groundbreaking:Septemberl987
Finish date: June 1988
Construction time: 9 months

Total: $3,100,000
Building only: $3,018,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $77 .50
Total per NSF: $86.83
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
concrete columns and steel beams
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: CMU block, steel plate
Exterior surface or facade: Textured
concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
duress/fire alarm, door control/monitoring

304

General population
Single occupancy: 50
Double occupancy: 6
Donns:40
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:72
Total design: 170
Current population: Unknown
~~~-~rt@~
~~•~llmigil

Design: Linear, cells on building interior
Cells per unit: Unknown
Inmates per unit (design): Unknown
Inmates per unit (cwrent): Unknown
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance
Management type (cwrent): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight Unknown

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Epoxy coating, sealed
concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Unknown
HVAC: Electric
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Unknown
Fire protection: Unknown
Windows: Unknown

Perimeter: Building exterior only, single
fence, video camera surveillance; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 31 %
Medium:69%
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Good competition
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
advanced order of materials
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Private-sector funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

N/J!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Texas
Frio County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

305

Lew Sterrett Justice Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Dallas County

Contact: Chuck Fawns, Director, Lew Sterrett Justice Center, Dallas, TX 79202, 214-653-8704
Architect: Vitetta Group, Inc., 642 North Broad Street, The Wallace Building, Philadelphia, PA 19130;
HarwoodK. Smith &Partners, 1111 Plazaof AmericaNorth,l.B 307,Dallas, TX75201, 214-969--5599
Construction Manager: N/A

TotalGSF: 59,914
Total NSF: 41,931
Corrections GSF: 59,914
Corrections NSF: 41,931
Housing area GSF: 59,914
Housing area NSF: 41,931
GSFperinmate(design): 141
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): 99
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Sire of cells: 246 (donn)
Net/gross square feet: 70%

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: March 1991
Construction time: 24 months

Total: Unknown
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: Unknown
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

-

Structural: Precast concrete
Exterior walls: CMU block-filled panels,
brick
futerior walls: Structural clay tile block
units, reinforced CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick face
Electronic technology systems: ccrv
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels,
satellite/cable

306

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:352
Special population
Single occupancy: 13
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 60
Total design: 425
Current population: Unknown

Design: Linear, cells on interior walls
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 8
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Intennittent and
remote surveillance
Management type (current): futennittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Mattresses on
floor, second bunk pennanently attached

Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

-

Contract method: Unknown
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: Limited; demolition
and painting
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Epoxy coating
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
RVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel, concrete
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for dorms
and common areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, perimeter
detection/alann, video camera
surveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximwn: 100%
Medium:0
Minimum:O

-

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
phased construction (fast track); good
competition
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Advanced order of materials,
coordination of design
Negative: Renovation occurred in
operational areas

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Texas
Dallas County

SECOND THROUGH tlNTH FLOORS BUI.DING - A

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

307

Nacogdoches County Law Enforcement Center
Responsible official: Sheriff, Nacogdoches County

Contact: Jack West, Jail Administrator, Nacogdoches Cmmty Jail, 2306 Douglas Highway, Nacogdoches, TX 75961, 409-560--7783
Architect: Di Stefano/Santopetro Architects, Inc., 10260 Westheimer, Houston,TX 77042, 713-953-9032
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 41,000
Total NSF: 38,000
Corrections GSF: 29,000
Corrections NSF: 27,000
Housing area GSF: 29,000
Housing area NSF: 27,000
GSF per inmate (design): 196
GSF per inmate (current): 220
·NSF per inmate (design): 182
NSF per inmate (current): 205
Siz.e of cells: 58.5 (single), 533 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: 93%

Groundbreaking: November 1988
Finish date: January 1990
Construction time: 13 months

Total: $3,999,000
Building only: $3,914,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $97.54
Total per NSF: $105.24
Total annual operating costs: $612,367

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
concrete columns and steel beams
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: CMU block, steel plate at
detention
Exterior surface or facade: Textured
concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
duress/fire alarm, door controVmonitoring

308

General population
Single occupancy: 50
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:48
Special population
Single occupancy: 2
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:48
Total design: 148
Current population: January 1992: 132

Design: Linear, cells on interior of building
Cells per unit: 8
Inmates per unit (design): 8
Inmates per unit (current): 8
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Intermittent
and remote surveillance
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:4
Evening:4
Midnight: 4

iP.DmU~JiDiijfi~iykl~~~~~~~!IN
Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking, electromechanical
Floor surface: Sealed concn:;te, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Other energy recycle unit, electric
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas
Windows: Unknown

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 34%
Medium:34%
Minimum: 32%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition
Negative: Complex electronic, mechanical,
and electrical systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Texas
Nacogdoches

r

,.O-..UII

I

i

.+--------

~
f !

j1

I
I

i

I

~I

1..--L

I

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

309

Rusk County Sheriff's Department
Responsible official: Sheriff, Rusk County

Contact: Dale Summers, Lieutenant, Rusk County Sheriff's Department, 210 Charlevoix, Henderson, TX 75652, 903-657-3581
Architect: Creative Environmental Concepts, Inc., 1313 South John Redditt, Lufkin, TX 75901, 409--637--6969
Construction Manager: N/A

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: February 1988
Construction time: Unknown

Total: $3,040,510
Building only: $2,815,510
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $382,115

-•■11111,1
Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: CMU block, brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior stnface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, duress/fire alarm, door
control/monitoring, custom control panels,
satellite/cable

310

Total GSF: Unknown
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: Unknown
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: Unknown
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): Unknown
GSFperinmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: N/A
Net/gross square feet Unknown

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Remote locking only
Floor stnface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation only
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
and common areas, manual alarm stations
Windows: Special security

General population
Single occupancy: 26
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 54
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 80
Current population: February 1993: 80

Perimeter: Building exterior only, perimeter
patrols and detection/alann; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:O
Minimum:O

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 15
Inmates per unit (design): 15
Inmates per unit (current): 15
Management type (design): Intennittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:3
Evening: 3
Midnight: 3

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 1
Security: 12
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 0
Total: 14
Current inmate/staff ratio: 5.7: 1
Contracted services: N/A

BlJIIIJ■RIIIIIBJI

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Unknown
Finance method: Unknown
Use of inmate labor. Unknown
Use of prefabrication: Unknown

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Texas
Rusk County

(No floorplan available at time of publication)

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

311

Oxbow Jail Facility
Responsible official: Sheriff, Salt Lake County

Contact: Captain Dan Ipson, Oxbow Jail Facility, 3152 South 1100West, South Salt Lake City, UT 84119, 801-974-7727
Architect: Gillies, Stransky, Brems & Smith Architects, 175 South Main Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84101, 801-521-8600
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 118,455
Total NSF: 97,130
Corrections GSF: 118,455
Corrections NSF: 97,130
Housing area GSF: 83,186
Housing area NSF: 75,878
GSFper inmate (design): 322
GSFper inmate (current): 643
NSF per inmate (design): 264
NSF per inmate (current): 528
Size of cells: Unknown
Net/gross square feet: 82%

llllll11B-.•1&I
Groundbreaking: July 1990
Finish date: October 1991
Construction time: 15 months

Total: $9,731,250
Building only: $9,731,250
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $6,834,000
Housing per inmate: $18,571
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $26,443
Total per GSF: $82.15
Total per NSF: $ 100.18
Total annual operating costs: $2,947,335

Structural: Load-bearing CMU block with
metal deck and steel joists
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior stuface or facade: CMU block
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, door control/monitoring,
custom control panels, satellite/cable

General population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 368
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 368
Current population: April 1993: 184

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 2
Inmates per unit (design): 184
Inmates per unit (current): 184
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Open additional
unit
Total officers per unit
Day: 3
Evening: 3

.-111
Midnight: 2

Door material(s): Polycarbonate
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: One-way to cells, two-way to
common areas
HVAC: Gas heat, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel, vinyl/plastic
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Slit

~,I\~•.
Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:0
Medium:0
Minimum: 100%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 3
Security: 34
Programs and treatment: 17
Maintenance: 8
Total:62
Current inmate/staff ratio: 3: 1
Contracted services: N/A

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, less expensive materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

312

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Utah
Salt Lake County

Iffi

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

313

Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Regional Adult Detention Center
Responsible official: County Administrator, Jail Board Chainnan

Contact: Darnley R. Hodge, Administrator, Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Regional Adult Detention Center, 1026 Fort Collier Road,
Winchester, VA22601, 703--665-6374
Architect: Sherertz Franklin Crawford Shaffner, 305 South Jefferson Street, Roanoke, VA 24011, 703-344--6664
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 99,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 99,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 62,900
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): Unknown
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: N/A
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

flllilll.rillliJ.tC•11111111t11

Groundbreaking: October 1989
Finish date: March 1991
Construction time: 17 months

Total: $15,400,000
Building only: $13,500,000
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: Unknown
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $3,352,591

Structural: Load-bearing masonry, precast
planks
Exterior walls: Brick
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: CCIV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels

314

General population
Single occupancy: 194
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 34
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 72
Total design: 300
Current population: May 1992: 255

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit 96
hunates per unit (design): 96
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: NIA

Total officers per unit
Day: 1
Evening: 1
Midnight: 1

Door material(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Unknown
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Concrete
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for
common areas, sprinklers for cells and
common areas, manual alann stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Building exterior only, video
camera surveillance; costs excluded

Inmate security level
Maximum: 17%
Medium:57%
Minimum: 13%
Other: 13%

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 9
Security: 73
Programs and treatment: 7
Maintenance: 6
Total:95
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.7: 1
Contracted services: Medical

~v,m-eyo
. . mB,~imf•~-~i
~~:~~~~:r~Y~~ I I I \ , , , ~ ~ ~ • ~
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, less expensive materials
Negative: N/A
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: Cost shared by local
jurisdictions
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Limited; structural
planks

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Virginia
Winchester

-~"'_/,==~,f;-.

~/"'

"'';.,,,,,c:,vl'.,,,,.

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

315

Greensville Correctional Center
Responsible official: Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

Contact: Ellis B. Wright Jr., Chief Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, 901 Corrections Way, Jarratt, VA 23870--9614, 804-535-7000
Architect: Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall (DMJM), 300 East42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, 212-983-2400
Construction Manager: Monison Knudson, 2430 Southland Drive, Chester, VA 23831, 804-796-1555

Total GSF: 883,211
Total NSF: 560,000
Corrections GSF: 883,211
Corrections NSF: 560,000
Housing area GSF: 425,736
Housing area NSF: 281,592
GSF per inmate (design): 387
GSFperinmate (current): 359
NSF per inmate (design): 245
NSF per inmate (current): 228
Size of cells: 74.5 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: 63%

Groundbreaking: December 1988
Finish date: June 1991
Construction time: 22 months

Total: $106,000,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Higher
Housing area: $42,397,596
Housing per inmate: $20,286
Housing per cell: $27,400
Total per inmate: $46,450
Total per GSF: $120.02
Total per NSF: $189.28
Total annual operating costs: $36,016,016

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
precast concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Natural wall,
textured concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring, card access, custom control
panels, perimeter detection/alarm, satellite/
cable

316

General population
Single occupancy: 1,006
Double occupancy: 1,084
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 192
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 2,282
Current population: April 1993: 2,459

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 43
Inmates per unit (design): 58
Inmates per unit (current): 67
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Intermittent
and remote surveillance, direct supervision
Means to handle crowding: Bunk beds in
cells, second bunk permanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day:4
Evening: 4
Midnight: 4

111111Nilillllill:111WR

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Inmate duress alarm
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Special security and screens

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers, video camera
surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:O
Minimum:O

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 65
Security: 673
Programs and treatment: 38
Maintenance: 39
Total: 910
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.7: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); less expensive materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Construction manager/
guaranteed maximum price (GMP)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Extensive; precast
concrete walls and structural tees

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Virginia
Jarratt

0

10

20

A......FI....J

NU/National Directory of Corrections Construction

317

Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Responsible official: Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

Contact: Bob Beck, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center, P.O. Box 860, Oakwood, VA 24631, 703-498-7411
Architect: Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall (DMJM), 300 East 42nd Street, New Yolk, NY 10017, 212-983-2400
Construction Manager: Fluor Daniel, 100 Fluor Daniel Drive, Greenville, SC 29607-2762, 803-281-4400

Total GSF: 306,414
Total NSF: 205,000
Corrections GSF: 306,414
Corrections NSF: 205,000
Housing area GSF: 141,912
Housing area NSF: 93,864
GSF per inmate (design): 440
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): 294
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 74.5 (single and double)
Net/gross square feet: 67%

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, forced air
Plumbing: China, stainless steel
combination unit
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas
Windows: Special security, security screens

Jlri'i1i,illi"'"'7§;,~~i!W;'~~'W!Eg

•ilti-ml~~~~•~i
Groundbreaking: December 1988
Finish date: Unknown
Construction time: 22 months

Total: $41,000,000
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: $14,132,532
Housing per inmate: $20,305
Housing per cell: $27,389
Total per inmate: $58,908
Total per GSF: $133.81
Total per NSF: $200
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
precast concrete cells
Exterior walls: Precast panels
Interior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Natural wall,
textured concrete
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, ccrv surveillance, staff
intercommunication, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring, card access, custom control
panels, perimeter detection/alann, satellite/
cable

318

General population
Single occupancy: 336
Double occupancy: 360
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 696
Current population: Unknown

Design: Modular/pod
• Cells per unit: 43
Inmates per unit (design): 58
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current): Unknown
Means to handle crowding: Unknown
Total officers per unit
Day: Unknown
Evening: Unknown
Midnight: Unknown

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s), towers; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:0
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: Unknown
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components, simple
construction methods
Negative: Difficult site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Construction Manager/
Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Extensive; precast
concrete cells, precast concrete structural
tees for roofs and exterior walls

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Virginia
Oakwood

0

10

20

FLFLJ

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

319

Lorton Maximum Security Facility
Responsible official: Administrator, District of Columbia Department of Corrections

Contact: Clarence Cotton, Project Manager, Lorton Maximum Security Facility, Furnace Road, Lorton, VA 22079, 202-939-7198
Architect: N/A
Construction Manager: Scotsman Buildings, 8211 Town Center Drive, Baltimore, MD 21236, 410-931--6000

Total GSF: Unknown
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: Unknown
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 22,320
Housing
NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): Unknown
GSF per inmate (current): Unknown
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 3,240 (dorm)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

area

ffiffi,,

Groundbreaking: March 1990
Finish date: September 1990
Construction time: 6 months

-

\

'

'

Total: $4,100,000
Building only: $2,400,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $20,500
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $1,188,000

Structural:Steelframe
Exterior walls: Steel stud, drywall
Interior walls: Steel stud, drywall
Exterior sutface or facade: Metal siding
Electronic technology systems: ccrv
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alann, door controV
monitoring

General popuJation
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:200
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 200
Current population: Unknown

Design: Dorms
Cells per unit: 1
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): 85
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance
Management type (current}: Remote
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility
Total officers per unit
Day:4
Evening: 4
Midnight: 2

Contract method: Turnkey design-build
Finance method: Cost shared by local
jurisdictions
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Extensive; module
buildings

320

Door material(s}: Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote locking only
Floor sutface: Vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells and common
areas
HVAC: Forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Unknown
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for dorms and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Standard and bars, security
screens

Perimeter: Double fence, razor wire on
fence(s}, towers, perimeter patrols, video
camera surveillance; costs excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:O
Minirnum:O

~~~~il~imi:~liiJlr;w
• ·•ITT
~~.wa:m<111rom1~1ffl
,L
Full-time equivalent
Administration: Unknown
Security: Unknown
Programs and treatment: Unknown
Maintenance: Unknown
Total: 297
Current inmate/staff ratio: Unknown
Contracted services: Unknown

I~"· ~ - .. ,
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components;
simple construction methods, phased
construction (fast track}; fast track
modular construction
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations, high labor cost onsite and low
labor cost for offsite module production
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components
Negative: Government procedures and
regulations, lengthy approval time

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Virginia
Lorton

--------.-,-:
s

-+:

[J

I!! 1

I

r
I

--------t---·

I!. 1
g

Nll!National Directory of Corrections Construction

321

Clallam Bay Correctional Center
Responsible official: Secretary, Washington Department of Corrections

Contact: Bob Wright, Superintendent, Oallam Bay Correctional Center, HC 63 Box 5000, Clallam Bay, WA 98326--9775, 206--963-3200
Architect: John GrahamAssociates,P.O. Box 521166, Tulsa, OK 74114-1720,404--876-3800
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 127,228
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 127,228
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 66,435
Housing area NSF: 48,915
GSFperinmate (design): 318
GSFperinmate(current): 318
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 88 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) of locks: Remote locking only
Floor surface: Lino/sheet vinyl, epoxy
coating, sealed concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to common areas
HYAC: Forced air
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Slit and special security

IIIIIJl!il!4-1111flllll

Groundbreaking: July 1991
Finish date: February 1993
Construction time: 20 months

Total: $13,200,000
Building only: $13,200,000
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $6,155,995
Housing per inmate: $15,400
Housingpercell: $15,400
Total per inmate: $33,000
TotalperGSF: $103.75
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $2,974,236

Structural: Steel frame, load-bearing
masonry
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior sUiface or facade: Stucco
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCTV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door control/monitoring, custom
control panels

322

General population
Single occupancy: 400
Double occupancy: 0
Donns: 0
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Donns:O
Total design: 400
Current population: October 1992: 400

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 50
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current): 50
Management type (design): Direct
supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, second bunk permanently
attached
Total officers per unit
Day:7
Evening: 7
Midnight: 7

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: Limited; painting,
fabrication of cell furniture
Use of prefabrication: None

Perimeter: Building exterior only, double
fence, razor wire on and between fence(s),
towers, perimeter patrols; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum:O
Medium: 100%
Minimum:O

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 14
Security: 111
Programs and treatment: 221
Maintenance: 25
Total: 371
Current inmate/staff ratio: 1. 1:1
Contracted services: Medical, educational
programs, water

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods, less
expensive materials
Negative: Slow construction and lengthy
building time, high labor costs, difficult
site conditions
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: Labor problems, weather
problems

N/J!National Direct01y of Corrections Construction

Washington
Clallam Bay

cc

0
0

..J
LL

:l:
I-

CC

:::,
0

LL

cc

0
0

..J

LL

C

cc

~

I-

NIJ!Nation.al Directory of Corrections Construction

323

Columbia Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Corrections

Contact: Jeff Endicott, Warden, Columbia Correctional Institution, Route 3, Highway 127, P.O. Box 950, Portage, WI53901,
608-742-9100
Architect: Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, 1831 Chestnut Street, St Louis, MO 63103, 314--421-2000
Construction Manager: Potter, Lawson & Pawlowsky, Inc., 15 Ellis Potter Court, Madison, WI 53711, 608-274-2741

Total GSF: 296,600
Total NSF: 207,620
Corrections GSF: 296,600
Corrections NSF: 207,620
Housing area GSF: 176,860
Housing area NSF: 123,800
GSF per inmate (design): 580
GSF per inmate (current): 516
NSF per inmate (design): 406
NSF per inmate (current): 361
Size of cells: 80 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 70%

Groundbreaking: February 1984
Finish date: May 1986
Construction time: 27 months

Total: $30,362,286
Building only: $27,739,014
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $18,100,000
Housing per inmate: $40,222
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: $59,417
Total per GSF: $102.37
Total per NSF: $146.24
Total annual operating cost.s: $13,083,358

Structural: Steel frame
Exterior walls: CMU block
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior stnface or facade: Brick
Electronic technology systems: ccrv
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door controV
monitoring, custom control panels,
perimeter detection/alarm

324

General population
Single occupancy: 450
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 61
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms: 0
Total design: 511
Current population: April 1993: 575

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls
Cells per unit: 50
Inmates per unit (design): 50
Inmates per unit (current}: 62
Management type (design): futermittent
surveillance
Management type (current): Remote
surveillance,directsupervision
Means to handle crowding: Second bunk
permanently attached
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening:2
Midnight: 1

-

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Doormaterial(s}: Steel
Type(s} of doors: Sliding
Type(s} of locks: Motor driven and remote
locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete
Intercom: Two-way to cells
HVAC: Gas heat
Plumbing: China
Furniture: Steel
. Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Slit

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on and
between fence(s}, towers, video camera
surveillance; costs included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:0
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
· Administration: 12
Security: 218
Programs and treatment: 34
Maintenance: 10
Total:274
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.1: 1
Contracted services: Medical

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, nine identical housing
unit.s
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems; long lead time for detention
equipment
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
coordination of design, onsite supervision
Negative: Slow response or delivery from
vendor/supplier, complex electronic,
mechanical, and electrical systems

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Wisconsin
Portage

;t::::
C

:::,
a>
C

en

::::,
0

:r:

c

~

Q)

~

Q)

en

o

O=-~

.c Cl) -0
(1)0<(

..... co a,

+-'
C

Q)

E§
Cl)·-

Ol°etj

co+-'
C <.F.J
~co-

-o~2
C
......,
::::, .t:::: C
CO C 0

__J:::, 0
~ U") co
a,

·-

C
Cit

:I

0

:c

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

325

Milwaukee County Jail and Criminal Justice Facility
Responsible official: Sheriff, Milwaukee Cowity

Contact: John Logowski, Acting Director, Milwaukee County Jail and Criminal Justice Facility, 949 North Ninth Street,
Milwaukee, WI 53213, 414-226--7050
Architect: Venture Architects, 205 West Highland, Milwaukee, WI 53203, 414-271-3359
Construction Manager: CRSS/BOWT, Oscar J. Boldt Construction Company, P.O. Box 8, Waukesha, WI 53188, 414-544-9118

Total GSF: 436,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 335,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 253,000
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSF per inmate (design): 420
GSF per inmate (current): 447
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: 70 (single)
Net/gross square feet: Unknown

Door material(s): Wood, metal

Type(s) of doors: Swinging, sliding
Type(s) oflocks: Manual locking
Floor smface: Sealed concrete
futercom: Two-way to cells
HVAC: Hot water, forced air
Plumbing: China, stainless steel
Furniture: Concrete
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alann stations
Windows: Slit

ffif~~Mi~~%WWimF""'"%"'1

~~~~~~,-•&1

Groundbreaking: November 1989
Finish date: October 1992
Construction time: 36 months

Total: $76,843,324
Building only: $75,419,075
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $43,763,821
Housing per inmate: $58,222
Housing per cell: $54,842
Total per inmate: N/A
Total per GSF: $176.25
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: Unknown

Structural: Cast-in-place concrete frame
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, stone
Interior walls: Cast-in-place concrete, CMU
block
Exterior smface or facade: Textured
concrete, stone
Electronic technology systems: Lighting
protection, CCIV surveillance, staff
intercommunication, inmate intercom,
paging and sound system, duress/fire
alann, door control/monitoring, card
access, custom control panels, integrated
computerized infonnation system for jail,
booking, and court

326

General population
Single occupancy: 744
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 54
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:0
Total design: 798
Current population: March 1993: 750

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 48
Inmates per unit (design): 48
Inmates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Intennittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, release by special master
Total officers per unit
Day: I
Evening: I
Midnight: I

Contract method: Multiple bid packages
(fast track)
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Extensive

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
excluded
Inmate security level
Maximum: 100%
Medium:0
Minimum:0

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 21 ·
Security: 128
Programs and treatment: 14
Maintenance: 9
Total: 172
Current inmate/staff ratio: 4.4: 1
Contracted services: Food

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); good competition, less
expensive materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Prefabricated components; simple
construction methods, phased construction
(fast track); advanced order of materials;
coordination of design
Negative: Weather problems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

?;;
~

~

::.!.
C

--~

1 state Ollender Housing

~

I:::.

t:,

l")

c

2 Protective Cuatody and

~

Trualy Housing

.Q,

3 General Housing

()

4 High Security and

C

Diaclplinary Houaing

~

5 Pod Support

(I:,
l")

,...

--

6 Floor Control
7 Non-Contact Visiting

C

~

""()

8 Contact Viaitlng

C

9 Indoor Exercise

~

""z;

10 Indoor/Outdoor Exercise

;;::

--,...
l")

C

~

:a
t =-·
=

;
i

t,.,)

t-,...}

-..J

"

"

.

r.tl
~

LEVEL FIVE MAIN

Q
§

'<

-·

r.tl

=

Racine Correctional Institution
Responsible official: Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Corrections

Contact: Oscar Shade, Warden, Racine Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 900, Sturtevant, WI 53177--0900, 414-886-3214
Architect: Venture Architects, 205 West Highland, Milwaukee, WI 53203, 414-271-3359
Construction Manager: NIA

Total GSF: 352,500
Total NSF: 188,500
Corrections GSF: 352,500
Corrections NSF: 188,500
Housing area GSF: 193,830
Housing area NSF: 116,300
GSFperinmate (design): 501
GSF per inmate (current): 402
NSF per inmate (design): 268
NSF per inmate (current): 215
Size of cells: 80 (single)
Net/gross square feet: 53%

Groundbreaking: March 1989
Finish date: April 1991
Construction time: 25 months

Total: $53,000,000
Building only: $30,324,241
Final construction cost: Lower
Housing area: $25,829,997
Housing per inmate: $39,738
Housing per cell: $39,738
Total per inmate: $75,391
Total per GSF: $150.35
Total per NSF: $281.17
Total annual operating costs: $12,312,734

li!IIIPJlawJiiilllll
Structural: Precast concrete frame, loadbearing masonry, brick
Exterior walls: CMU block, exterior
insulation finish system
Interior walls: CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, exterior
insulation finish system
Electronic technology systems: ccrv
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, door control/
monitoring, card access, custom control
panels, perimeter detection/alarm, satellite/
cable

328

General population
Single occupancy: 650
Double occupancy: 0
Dorrns:0
Special population
Single occupancy: 53
Double occupancy: 0
Dorrns:0
Total design: 703
Current population: April 1993: 877

Doormaterial(s): Wood, steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging, sliding
Type(s} oflocks: Remote and manual
locking
Floor surface: Sealed concrete, vinyl tile
Intercom: Two-way to cells
HVAC: Heating/air circulation, steam heat,
forced air, central plant/hot water
Plumbing: Unknown
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors and
sprinklers for cells and common areas,
manual alarm stations
Windows: Commercial grade with bars

Perimeter: Double fence, perimeter patrols
and detection/alarm, razor wire on
fence(s), towers; costs excluded

Inmate security level
Maximum: 36%
Medium:58%
Minimum:0
Segregation cells: 6%

~~~"lmm~~
r~~~~-

Design: Modular/pod
Cells per unit: 100
Inmates per unit (design): 100
Inmates per unit (current): 125
Management type (design): Remote
surveillance, direct supervision
Management type (current): Direct
supervision
Means to handle crowding: Transfer to
another facility, bunk beds in cells,
mattresses on floor
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 2
Midnight: 2

-

Contract method: Conventional design-bidbuild
Finance method: State general obligation
bonds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: None

Full-time equivalent
Administration: 50
Security: 211
Programs and treatment: 30
Maintenance: 20
Total: 311
Current inmate/staff ratio: 2.8: 1
Contracted services: Medical

-····.
I

.

~

...

Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Simple construction methods,
good competition, less expensive materials
Negative: Difficult site conditions; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical
systems
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: Simple construction methods,
advanced order of materials, coordination
of design
Negative: Weather problems

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Wisconsin
Sturtevant

♦

•

.
i

!

~

C

<II

a:

0
-

0

0

!"'"_______ ---- ____ _, _,_. ,. _________ ----- -.!
l
~

,

i

r· :··

r---

i

::
::I

~

..,

~

ii::

~:;-

!ii (-

·,., ..

. . .~-·~,--=·,.
'-..

...

C

ftl

a:

-

Cll
C

C

0

E

X

:I

GI

GI
<II
ftl

al

0

~

?:

u. :iu

-

jJJ

i:n
C

GI
U)

E
E

:I

!! c
'Ei
ID

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

~

329

Sublette County Jail
Responsible official: Sheriff, Sublette County

Contact: Robert Sutherland, Jail Administrator, Sublette County Jail, 33 l/2 South Tyler Avenue, Pinedale, WY 82941, 307-367-4378
Architect: Unknown
Construction Manager: N/A

Total GSF: 4,000
Total NSF: Unknown
Corrections GSF: 4,000
Corrections NSF: Unknown
Housing area GSF: 4,000
Housing area NSF: Unknown
GSFperinmate (design): 182
GSF per inmate (current): 800
NSF per inmate (design): Unknown
NSF per inmate (current): Unknown
Size of cells: N/A
Net/gross square feet Unknown

llllllll■lai11111111111

Groundbreaking: Unknown
Finish date: January 1985
Construction time: Unknown

Total: Unknown
Building only: Unknown
Final construction cost: Unknown
Housing area: Unknown
Housing per inmate: Unknown
Housing per cell: Unknown
Total per inmate: Unknown
Total per GSF: Unknown
Total per NSF: Unknown
Total annual operating costs: $167,857

Structural: Load-bearing precast panels,
steel frame, cast-in-place concrete frame,
modular metal cells
Exterior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
futerior walls: Precast panels, cast-in-place
concrete, CMU block
Exterior surface or facade: Brick, stucco,
textured concrete
Electronic technology systems: CCTV
surveillance, staff intercommunication,
inmate intercom, paging and sound
system, duress/fire alarm, satellite/cable

330

General population
Single occupancy: 6
Double occupancy: 12
Dorms:4
Special population
Single occupancy: 0
Double occupancy: 0
Dorms:O
Total design: 22
Current population: January 1992: 5

ll:lllw!tllftol:41Ellllll;lllt;

Design: Linear, cells on outside walls and
building interior
Cells per unit: 3
fumates per unit (design): Unknown
fumates per unit (current): Unknown
Management type (design): Intermittent
surveillance,video
Management type (current): Intermittent
surveillance
Means to handle crowding: N/A
Total officers per unit
Day:2
Evening: 1
Midnight 1

Doormaterial(s): Steel
Type(s) of doors: Swinging
Type(s) oflocks: Remote and manual
locking
Floor surface: Steel
futercom: Two-way to cells
INAC: Heating/air circulation, gas heat,
forced air
Plumbing: Stainless steel
Furniture: Steel
Fire protection: Smoke detectors for cells
Windows: Slit, special security

Perimeter: Building exterior only; costs
included
Inmate security level
Maximum: 33%
Medium:O
Minimum: 66%

lillillllilh1111t111BIII
Full-time equivalent
Administration: 1
Security: 5
Programs and treatment: 0
Maintenance: 0
Total: 6
Current inmate/staff ratio: 8
Contracted services: Medical, food

~IIIBI•III
■
Factors affecting construction costs
Positive: Prefabricated components
Negative: Construction and equipment
complications
Factors affecting time schedule
Positive: N/A
Negative: N/A

Contract method: Turnkey design-build
Finance method: Local general obligation
bonds, Federal funds
Use of inmate labor: None
Use of prefabrication: Extensive; steel
modular system

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

Wyoming
Sublette County

..

-~

-~

►

n· -

•t,

......,

~

,.._

-

~

~ N

V'i
il...

T

C)

..,

l 1

. ~-

.

<:<

\_

1 _...

~

(j

~

(.,___ ~~

•

(2~

\,\

-~

0
0

<::")
~

<:,

::...__

a::

l

(

><!

0

-

11
'f

"'"

I

rn

()'

"'"
ric.o

q

:1

L()

~J

.

-- -

(\J

r<) ~

- -

l

.

.s

1

-

rn

--~

'~---

,:_

2.

.r---

Cl)

- -

I
T

f

::r\

('

'."'>
\.'·
--c.-

~,

"

·~

'

T

-

-

:a:

.,-.--iL-

.:,
-7'

"'=-

er::

l
-,.
OJ
2.

0

-->

i....:...

t
-<-

0)

>;:1

0
0

~

.

.

-

<D

- -

t

~~
------0
,:,

~

~
'

l.{)

"<
~

0

'
'
"
<;_---:,
'~

-

-

l~t!::

r.0 ~

a)

l1.,,,

l

t

z
.Z

('J

.

' ..

N
~

L0

~
\)

~

~

2.

.

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

-

.

N

0

""I
{'

0

-

(\J

·m
-

a..

~

<I
a:

:r
(./'\

w

ex:

-

Ct: <C
Li...

~

lu

~

<t:..

•

331

AppendixA
Reference: Architects and
Construction Managers

Architects and construction managers

Firm name
Abend Singleton Associates, Inc.
Alcon Associates, Inc.
Architectural Technologies, Inc.
Architectural Technologies, Inc.
Architectural Technologies, Inc.
BASCO Associates
BLDD Architects
BLDD Architects
BLDD Architects
BLDD Architects
BLI Construction
Barron, Heinberg & Brocato Architects
&Engineers
Barron, Heinberg & Brocato Architects
&Engineers
Barton-Malow
Barton-Malow/fornpkins-Beckwith
Benatec Associates
Birkeland Architects (out of business)
Bowen & Watson
CMW,Inc.
CRSS/B0WT
CRSS Constructors, Inc.
CRSS Constructors, Inc.
CRSS Constructors, Inc.
CRSS Constructors, Inc.
CRSS Constructors, Inc.
CRSS Constructors, Inc.
CRSS Constructors, Inc.
Oark Construction Company
Creative Environmental Concepts, Inc.
Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall (DMJM)
Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall (DMJM)
Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall (DMJM)
Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall (DMJM)
Davidson and Jones Construction
Davidson and Jones Construction
Di Stefano/Santopetro Architects, Inc.
Di Stefano/Santopetro Architects, Inc.
Di Stefano/Santopetro Architects, Inc.
Di Stefano/Santopetro Architects, Inc.
Durrant Architects, Inc.
Dworsky Associates
EDIS/CRSS
E. George Wynn-Architect
E. George Wynn-Architect
Eddie Frances, A.I.A.
Ellerbe Becket, Inc.
Federal Construction Company
Hour Daniel

Reference

Facility name

Facility type

Marion County Jail and Law Enforcement Center
Lowndes County Jail
Central Lam1dry Facility
Jessup Pre-Release Unit
Patuxent Institution
York County Prison
Danville Correctional Center
Hill Correctional Center
Illinois River Correctional Center
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Herny County Jail

County complex
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail

248
124
218
220
226
296
156
158

Federal Correctional Institution-Oakdale I

Federal prison

204

Federal Detention Center-Oakdale II
Sergeant William Dickerson Detention Facility
John E. Goode Pre-Trial Detention Facility
Federal Correctional Institution-Schuylkill
Sherburne County Jail
Northeast Probation Detention Center
Carroll County Regional Detention Center
Milwaukee County Jail and Criminal Justice Facility
Arapahoe County Justice Center
Boone County Jail
Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center
Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center
Sedgwick County Adult Local Detention Facility
Sedgwick County Work Release
Will County Adult Detention Facility
Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility
Rusk County Sheriffs Department
Arapahoe County Justice Center
Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Greensville Correctional Center
Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Durham County Jail Annex
Wake County Public Safety Center
Bee County Jail
Caldwell County Jail
Frio County Jail
Nacogdoches County Law Enforcement Center
Boone County Jail
Santa Oara County Main Jail
Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility
Alamosa County Detention Center
Huerfano County Law Enforcement Center
Metro West Detention Center
Metropolitan Detention Center-Los Angeles
Pinellas County Jail
Keen Mountain Correctional Center

Federal detention/jail
County jail
County and city complex
Federal prison
Com1ty complex
State prison
Regional jail
County complex
Jail complex
Jail complex
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
County jail
State prison
County complex
County complex
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
County complex
County complex
County complex
County complex
County complex
County jail
County complex
State prison
County complex
County complex
County jail
Federal detention/jail
County jail
State prison

206
234

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Page

160

170
118

92

290
240
126
200
326
64
174
68
246

190
192
172

230
310
64

202
316
318
270
272
298

300
304
308
244

54
82
62
70
96
50
100

318

335

Architects and construction managers (continued)

Reference

Firm name

Facility name

Facility type

G.E. Johnson Construction

Boulder County Jail
Mesa County Detention Facility
Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Ely State Prison
Federal Correctional lnstitu.tion-McKean
Oxbow Jail Facility
El Dorado Correctional Facility
Lamed Correctional Mental Health Facility
Monmouth County Correction Institution
Tippecanoe County Law Enforcement Center
Mesa County Detention Facility
Cattaraugus County Jail
Genesee County Jail
Glynn County Detention Center
Genesis Unit 200 Bed Correctional Facility
Grafton Correctional fustitution
West Valley Detention Center
Columbia Correctional Institution
Federal Correctional fustitution-Three Rivers
James I. Montgomery Correctional Center
Macomb County Jail
Minnesota Correctional Facility-Shakopee
Montgomery County Detention Center
Sergeant William Dickerson Detention Facility
Tippecanoe County Law Enforcement Center
Wake County Public Safety Center
Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center
Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center
Lansing Correctional Facility-Fast
Western Missouri Correctional Center
Pueblo County Detention Facility-Work Release
Central Correctional Institute
Central Probation Detention Center
Clayton County Correctional Institution
Coastal Correctional fustitution
Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
Georgia Women's Correctional fustitute
Hays Correctional Institute-Boot Camp
Henry County Jail
Homerville Parole Center
I.W. Davis Probation Detention Center
Lowndes County Jail
Northeast Probation Detention Center
Northwest Probation Detention Center
Phillips Correctional fustitute---Boot Camp
Rockdale-Dekalb Probation Detention Center
Rogers Correctional Institute
Southeast Probation Detention Center
Telfair Correctional Jnstitu.te-Boot Camp
Treutlen Shock Unit

County jail
County complex
State prison
State prison
Federal prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
County complex
County complex
County jail
County complex
County complex
County jail
State prison
County jail
State prison
Federal prison
County jail
County jail
State prison
County jail
County jail
County complex
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison

G.E. Johnson Construction

GRW Engineers, fuc.
Ganthner, Melby, Lee Architects & Planners
Geddes, Brecher, Qualls, Cunningham
Gillies, Stransky, Brems & Smith Architects
Gossen Livingston Associates
Gossen Livingston Associates
Grad Partnership
Guepel DeMars
H.D.R., fuc.
·Habiterra Associates
Habiterra Associates
Hansen Lind Meyer
Hansen Lind Meyer
Heery/Oz.anne
Heery-Vanir
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, fuc.
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, fuc.
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, fuc.
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Hoffinan De.Michele, Inc.
Hoover, Berg, Desmond
Horst, Terrill & Karst Architects
Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff
Hurtig, Gardner & Froilich Architects, Inc.
IPG,fuc.
IPG,Inc.
IPG,Inc.
IPG,fuc.
IPG,fuc.
IPG,Jnc.
IPG,Jnc.
IPG,fuc.
IPG,Inc.
IPG,Inc.
, IPG,Jnc.
IPG,Jnc.
IPG,Inc.
IPG,fuc.
IPG,fuc.
IPG, Inc.
IPG,Inc.
IPG,Jnc.
IPG,Jnc.

336

Page
66

72
202
252
288
312
182
188
258
180
72
260
262
114
86
274
60
324
302
90
232
238
222
234
180
272
246
68
186
250
74
102
104
106
108
110
112
116
118
120
122
124
126
128

130
132
134
136
138
140

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Architects and construction managers (continued)

Reference

Firm name

Facility name

Facility type

IPG,Inc.
IPG,Inc.
IP:G,Inc.
IPG,Inc.
IPG,Inc.
Illinois Department of Corrections,
Capital Programs Unit
Illinois Department of Corrections,
Capital Programs Unit
lliinois Department of Corrections,
Capital Program Unit
Jack Jennings and Sons
Jacobs, Wyner, Ehrenfrantz
James A Lichty
James Associates
John Graham Associates
JWandSons
KA Parsons Associates
KA. Parsons Associates
Larry Zimmer-Architect
L. Dow Oliver & Associates
L. Dow Oliver & Associates
L. Dow Oliver & Associates
Legat Architects
Legat Architects
Lescher & Mahoney/ DIR Group
Lescher & Mahoney
Lorenz & Williams, Inc.
MG Engineering and Construction
MZA
May and Holbrook
Morris Diesel
Morrison-Knudson Parametric Co.
Morrison-Knudsen Parametric Co.
Multiple architects
Music and Worth Construction
No Architect
No Architect
No Architect
O'Brien Atkins Associates
O'Brien Atkins Associates
O'Brien Kreitzberg
O'Brien Kreitzberg
O'Donnell and Maccarato, Inc.
Pages,Inc.
Patrick Sullivan Associates
Phillips Swager Associates
Phillips Swager Associates
Phillips Swager Associates
Potter, Lawson & Pawlowsky, Inc.

Ware Correctional Instimte
Washington Correctional Instimtion-Boot Camp
West Central Probation Detention Center
Western Probation Detention Center
Women's Probation Detention Center

State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison
State prison

146
150
152
154

Danville Correctional Center

State prison

156

Hill Correctional Center

State prison

158

Western Illinois Correctional Center
Genesis Unit 200 Bed Correctional Facility
Philadelphia Industrial Correctional Center
Montgomery County Detention Center
Tippecanoe County Law Enforcement Center
Clallam Bay Correctional Center
Alameda City Police Department and Jail
Cumberland County Jail
Lew Sterrett Justice Center
Saguache County Jail
Orleans Parish Prison
St. Bernard Jail Complex
Tulane Avenue Facility
McHenry County Government Center
Robert H. Babcox Justice Center
Marion County Corrections Facility
Boulder County Jail
Warren Correctional Institution
Rockdale-Dekalb Probation Detention Center
ECI: Leo Chesney Women's Center
Baltimore Pre-Release Unit for Women
Federal Correctional Institution-Fairton
Greensville Correctional Center
Philadelphia Industrial Correctional Center
State Correctional Institution at Waymart
Southeast Probation Detention Center
Lerdo Pre-Trial
Lorton Maximum Security Facility
Stanton County Law Enforcement Center
Durham County Jail Annex
Wake County Public Safety Center
Santa Clara County Main Jail
Stanislaus County Public Safety Center
Bucks County Rehabilitation Center
Women's Probation Detention Center
South County Detention Facility
Robinson Correctional Center
Taylorville Correctional Center
Will County Adult Detention Facility
Columbia Correctional Institution

State prison
County jail
City jail
County jail
County complex
State prison
City complex
County jail
County jail
County jail
County and city jail
County jail
County and city jail
County complex
County complex
County complex
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison (privately operated)
State prison
Federal prison
State prison
City jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
County complex
County complex
County complex
County complex
County jail
County jail
State prison
County andcity jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison

170
86
~92
224
180
322
38
254
306
76
208
210
212
162

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Page
144

164

284
66
280
132
44

216
256
316
292
294
136
4S
320
196

270
272
54

58
286

154
56
166
168
172
324

337

Architects and construction managers (continued}

Reference

Page

Firm name

Facility name

Facility type

Quandel
RC. Byce & Associates
Ranon & Partners, Inc.
Reddick Construction Company
Richard Bowen and Associates
Robert P. Madison futernational
Robertson Strong Apgar Architects
Ron Webb (out of business)
Rosser Justice Systems
Rosser Justice Systems
Rosser Justice Systems
Rosser Justice Systems
Rosser Justice Systems
Rosser Justice Systems
Rosser Justice Systems
Rosser Justice Systems
Rosser Justice Systems
Rosser Justice Systems
Rosser White Hobbs Davidson McClellan
Kelly,Inc.
SMP(The Design Partnership
SJ. Amorroso Construction Company
Schaefer, John, Cox, Frey & Asssociates
Schenkel Shultz
Schenkel Shultz
Schlup, Becker & Brennan
Scotsman Buildings
Setter Leach & Lindstrom, Inc.
Shaughnessy Fickel and Scott Architects, Inc.
Sherertz Franklin Crawford Shaffner

York County Prison
Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility
Hillsborough County Orient Road Jail
West Central Probation Detention Center
Lorain Correctional Institution
Grafton Correctional Institution
Metro Jefferson Public Safety Building
Duplin County Jail
Brevard County Detention Center
Garner Correctional Institution
Harrison County Jail
Naval Consolidated Brig Miramar
Northwest Ohio Regional Jail
Palm Beach County Stockade
Saratoga County Law Enforcement Center
U.S. Federal Penitentimy-Atlanta
Washington Correctional Institution
West Valley Detention Center

County jail
State prison
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
County complex
County jail
County jail
State prison
County complex
Regional jail (military)
Regional jail
County jail
County complex
Federal prison
State prison
County jail

Martin Correctional Institution
Stanislaus County Public Safety Center
South County Detention Facility
Sedgwick County Adult Local Detention Facility
Boone County Jail
Kosciusko County Work Release
Wyandotte County Detention Center
Lorton Maximum Security Facility
Hennepin County Adult Detention Center
Johnson County Jail
Clruke-Frederick-Winchester Regional Adult
Detention Center
Shawnee County Adult Detention Facility
Alexander Cybulski Correctional Institution
John E. Goode Pre-Trial Detention Facility
Norfolk County Sheriffs Office and
Correctional Center
James I. Montgomery Correctional Center
Alameda County Jail
Garner Correctional Institution
Lorain Correctional Institution
Gibson County Jail
Butte County Minimum Security Facility
Sublette County Jail
Alameda City Police Department and Jail
Alameda County Jail
Milwaukee County Jail and Criminal Justice Facility
Racine Correctional Institution
Bucks County Rehabilitation Center
Cumberland County Jail
Federal Correctional Institution-Fairton

State prison
County jail
County and city jail
County jail
County jail
County jail
County complex
State prison
County jail
County jail

94
58
56
190
174
178
198
320
236

Regional jail
County jail
State prison
County and city complex

314
194
78
92

County jail
County jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
County jail
County jail
County jail
,City complex
County jail
County complex
State prison
County jail
County jail
Federal prison

228
90

Slemmons Associates, Architects
Stecker, LaBau, Arneill, McManus Architects
Sverdrup Corporation
The Architect's Collaborative
The Haskell Company
Turner Construction
Turner Construction
Turner Construction
United Consulting Engineers and Architects
Unknown
Unknown
VEN Architects
VBN Architects
Venture Architects
Venture Architects
Vitetta Group
Vitetta Group
Vitetta Group

338

296
230
88
150
276
274
264

268
84
80
242
52
278
98
266

142
148
60

184

40

80
276
176
42
330
38
40

326
328
286
254
256

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Architects and construction managers (continued)

Reference

Firm name

Facility name

Facility type

VitettaGroup
Vitetta Group
WBRC

Lew Sterrett Justice Center
Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility
Androscoggin County Jail
Federal Detention Center-Dublin
Pinellas County Jail
Central Laundry Facility
Jessup Pre-Release Unit
Patuxent Institution
Sedgwick County Work Release
Varner Unit
Federal Correctional Institution-Sheridan

County jail
State prison
County jail
Federal detention/jail
County jail
State prison
State prison
State prison
County jail
State prison
Federal prison

WRO Architects

Watson and Company (out of business)
Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.
Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.
Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.
Wilson-Darnell Associates
Wittenberg, Delany, and Davidson
Zimmwe Gunsul Frasca Partnership

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Page
306
82
214
46

100
218
220
226
192
36
282

339

j

/

AppendixB
Data Base
Proftle Information

\

Data Base Profile Information

Each facility profile appearing in this directory provides 91
pieces of information. listed below is the full range of data
supplied by the architects and facility administrators for
each facility. The data are maintained on the Construction
Information Exchange data base. This information is
available on diskette and in hardcopy printout to meet
individual needs.

Time frames (e.g., bid, groundbreaking, and completion
dates}
General population capacity (e.g., double cell capacity and
size, dorm capacity and size}
Special housing capacity (e.g., single cell capacity and size,
dorm capacity and size)

Facility
Total design capacity (e.g., cells, inmates)
County
Single cell percentage
Jurisdiction official
Special population percentage
Facility official
Architectural firm

Number of cells (cells allocated for specific inmate populations, such as females, drug offenders, and illegal aliens)

Additional architectural firm

Percentage crowded

Private organization (facility owned/managed by
private-sector organization)

Current population (e.g., date, inmate capacity)

Category (e.g., new construction, expansion, conversion)

Means to handle crowding (e.g., transfer to another facility,
bunk beds)

Facility type (e.g., jail, prison, complex-use)

Total costs (e.g., construction, per inmate, per GSF)

Facility complex use (e.g., law enforcement, courts)

Final construction cost

Commitment type (e.g., pretrial, sentenced)

Building costs (e.g., total, per cell, per NSF)

Jurisdiction level (e.g., Federal, State, county)

Site acquisition cost

Building(s) configuration (e.g., integrated structure,
campus style, highrise)

Unusual site/offsite cost
Furnishing and equipment cost

Facility location (e.g., rural, urban, suburb)
Housing costs (e.g., housing area, per inmate)
Amount ofland
Land for future construction

Operating costs-corrections (e.g., total, staff, food,
medical)

Included spaces (e.g., housing, support services,
programming)

Operating costs-law enforcement (e.g., total, staff,
supplies/equipment)

Excluded spaces (e.g., housing, support services,
programming)

Operating costs-court (e.g., total, staff, transportation)
Cost per inmate per year

NIJ!National Directory of Corrections Construction

343

Cost per inmate per day

Positive cost factors (e.g., phased construction, less
expensive materials and hardware)

Gross square feet (e.g., total, corrections, courts)
Net square feet (e.g., total, corrections, law enforcement)
NSF/GSF percentage
Housing gross square feet
Housing net square feet
Housing space percentage
GSF per inmate (e.g., design, current)
NSF per inmate (e.g., housing design)

Housing design (e.g., modular/pod, linear)
Housing unit composition (e.g., cells and inmates per
housing unit)
Management type-design (e.g., direct supervision,
intermittent or remote surveillance)
Management type---current (e.g., direct supervision,
intermittent or remote surveillance)
Security levels (maximum, medium, minimum, other}
Perimeter security (e.g., building exterior, razor wire on
fence(s), perimeter detection/alarm)
Electronic technology systems (e.g., CCTV surveillance,
custom control panels, door control/monitoring systems)
Closed circuit television (e.g., bond/arraignment hearings,
inmate surveillance)
Construction materials (construction materials for the
interior, exterior, structural, and surface/facade of building,
such as CMU block, precast panels, steel frame, precast
concrete cells, brick, textured concrete)
Cell furnishings, finishes, and fixtures (e.g., sliding,
remote-locking steel doors, stainless steel plumbing, airconditioning, gas heat, sealed concrete floors, special
security windows, wooden furniture, two-way intercom
system to cells and common areas, smoke detectors in cells
and common areas)

344

Negative cost factors (e.g., high labor costs, government
procedures (regulations and "red tape"))
Positive time factors (e.g., prefabricated components,
coordination of design [between construction manager and
owner])
Negative time factors (e.g., weather problems; complex
electronic, mechanical, and electrical systems)
Contract method (e.g., conventional design-bid-build,
multiple bid packages/fast track)
Finance method (e.g., State and local general obligation
bonds, lease purchase, fixed financing rate, Federal funds,
private-sector funds)
Use of inmate labor (e.g., extensive, moderate, limited,
explanation)
Use of prefabrication (e.g., extensive, moderate, limited,
explanation)
Contract services (e.g., medical, transportation)
Staffing-design (number of administrative, security,
maintenance, program, and treatment staff)
Staffing---current (number of administrative, security,
maintenance, program, and treatment staff)
Staffing adequacy
Number of inmates per staff (inmates per security, program, treatment, and total staff)
Officers per housing unit (e.g., day, evening, midnight)
General contractor
Construction manager
Structural engineer
Government official

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Law Enforcement Complex

Total courtrooms

Facility official

Courtrooms shared with corrections

Building(s) configuration (e.g., clusters, courtyard, integrated structure)

Gross square feet (e.g., male lockup/holding, average
courtroom, administrative offices)

Included spaces (e.g., lockup/holding, administration,
training, communications/dispatch, processing/in take)

Net square feet (e.g., female lockup/holding, juvenile
lockup/holding, average courtroom)

Gross square feet (e.g., lockup/holding, administration,
sallyport, firing range)

Detainee transportation to and from courthouse (e.g.,
skybridge, vehicle, officer(s) escort)

Net square feet (e.g., lockup/holding, training facility, roll
call room, administration)

Detainee movement within courthouse (e.g., separate
elevator/stairwell, same elevator/stairwell)

Lockup/holding area total cells

Separate security entrance/exit

Lockup/holding area average daily number of detainees

Types of courthouse security systems (e.g., court officers/
deputies, bullet-proof shielding, panic buttons, CCTV
surveillance)

Special housing cells (e.g., total, medical, suicidal,
isolation)
Detainee management-special housing (e.g., CCTV
surveiUance, intermittent surveillance)

Types of courthouse security personnel (e.g., bailiffs,
deputy sheriffs, private police)
Courtroom lockup/holding space

Detainee management-lockup/holding area (e.g., intercom
system, CCTV surveillance)

Separate juvenile lockup/holding

Number of hours prior to transport

Separate female lockup/holding

Secure area for juvenile offenders

Lockup/holding area cells (e.g., juvenile, male, female)

Number of staff-lockup/holding area

Lockup/holding area average daily detainees (e.g., juvenile,
male, female)

Types of security systems-lockup/holding area (e.g.,
detainee duress alarm, card access, metal detector(s))

Types of lockup/holding security personnel (e.g., deputy
sheriffs, local police, U.S. marshals)

Courts Complex

Number oflockup/holding officers (e.g., juvenile, male,
female)

Facility official

Types of lockup/holding security systems (e.g., intercom
systems, high security glazing, door controVmonitoring
systems)

Facility type (e.g., criminal, district, circuit, juvenile)
Building(s) configuration (e.g., highrise, integrated
structure,courtyard)

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

345

AppendixC
Additional Resources

i

I
i

Additional Resources

Publications
The following publications are available through ND's
Construction Information Exchange.
Construction Bulletin Series

Acquiring New Prison Sites: The Federal Experience. 1987.
4 pp. NCJ 106784. Free.
This bulletin explains how the Federal prison system
chooses and acquires sites for new prisons.
California Tests New Construction Concepts. 1986. 12 pp.
NCJ 101593. Free.
In an attempt to ease prison crowding, California has
initiated an expansion plan using two advanced construction techniques.
Construction Options: A California Case Study. 1992. 8 pp.
NCJ 136079. Free.
This case study demonstrates how Santa Clara County
(California), pressed by the court in inmate litigation,
assessed alternative construction methods and assembled
its own building system that met the criteria of quality,
economy, and rapid construction.
Cost Savings in New Generation Jails: The Direct Supervision Approach. 1988. 8 pp. NCJ 105288. Free.
To resolve crowding in jails, many local governments
are now considering "new generation" jails with an
innovative management method known as direct
supervision.
Florida Sets Example With Use of Concrete Modules. 1986.
8 pp. NCJ 100125. Free.
A construction technique using prefabricated concrete
cell modules has enabled Florida to open a new 336-bed
unit for the prison at Raiford in only 8 months and at a
cost of about $16,000 per cell.
From Arizona to South Carolina: Transfer of a Prison
Design Model. 1990. 8 pp. NCJ 114915. Free.
Prison officials in South Carolina adapted plans prepared
for a Federal prison in Arizona, thereby eliminating
several costly and time-consuming steps required by the
conventional approach to prison construction.

Nil/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Inmates Build Prisons in South Carolina. 1987. 12 pp. NCJ
106783. Free.
Use of inmates for construction of correctional facilities
will decrease the cost of building and at the same time
provide incentives and training to develop skills.
Jail Construction in California. 1990. 12 pp. NCJ 125097.
Free.
California's program to fund construction of county jails
is an attempt to address the problems of crowding and
deterioration of facilities that are faced by corrections
authorities nationwide.
Maine Jails: Progress Through Partnerships. 1987. 8 pp.
NCJ 104918. Free.
This summary of Maine's successful efforts to improve
its jails focuses on State, county, and local planning; jail
design; fostering public support for jail improvements;
and State jail standards and inspection.
New Construction Methods for Correctional Facilities. 1986.
8 pp. NCJ 100121. Free.
After reviewing the problems of prison and jail crowding
as well as the high cost of prison construction, this
bulletin presents case studies of cost-effective prison
construction and describes ND's technical assistance
services for prison construction.
Ohio's New Approach to Prison and Jail Financing. 1986.
12 pp. NCJ 102093. Free.
Ohio's innovative method for financing prison construction-the leasing of prison facilities by the Department
of Rehabilitation and Correction and the use of securities
with a variable interest rate-offers advantages worthy
of consideration by other States planning prison
construction.
Oklahoma Prison Expansion Saves Time and Money. 1987.
6 pp. NCJ 105290. Free.
Oklahoma achieved rapid and inexpensive prison
construction by expanding an existing institution with
a minimum security housing unit of 90 cells, using
the design of a previous project and prefabricated
construction.

349

Stopping Escapes: Perimeter Security. 1987. 12 pp. NCJ
104600. Free.
Based on a 1984 Bureau of Justice Statistics survey of
903 State correctional facilities, this report compares
types of prison perimeter security, with particular
attention to New York State's procedure for selecting the
appropriate type of perimeter security for each prison,
and provides guidelines for selecting perimeter security.

Other Publications and Reports
Building On Experience (Model program description). 1987.
70 pp. NCJ 103869. $8.40 (U.S.), $9.10 (Canada), $12.50
(other).
This case study describes how Ohio has exploited the
potential of new approaches in construction, design, and
financing to build a prison that was not only less
expensive to construct than a traditional design, but is
expected to realize long-term savings because of
innovative management and financing methods.
Correctional Facility Design and Management (Issues and
Practices). 1985. 128 pp. NCJ 096969. $9.90 (U.S.),
$11.55 (Canada), $15.60 (other).
This publication discusses a 1-year study of correctional
facilities construction in 15 States and outlines the
practices and processes used in the planning, design, and
construction of the facilities.
Development of a Test Method To Evaluate Penetrating
Resistance of High Security Glazing. 1986. 240 pp. NCJ
104868. $5.20 (U.S.), $5.20 (Canada), $7.10 (other).
This report describes the development of a test method to
evaluate the penetration resistance of glazing materials
(used as a barrier material in correctional facilities)
subjected to a simultaneous attack of mechanical impact
with a sharp-pointed tool and heat application.
Federal Surplus Real Property Transfer Program (Fact
sheet). 1992. 1 p. LT000045. Free.
The purpose of the Federal Surplus Real Property
Transfer Program is to transfer or convey to State and
local governments, at no cost, surplus real property
determined by the Attorney General to be required for
correctional facility use. Through this program, correctional facility capacity is enhanced so that programs and
projects may be provided for the care and rehabilitation
of incarcerated criminal offenders.

350

Additional Readings
These additional readings reflect a representative sample of
citations available from the NIJ,INCJRS literature collection
on corrections construction.

Planning and Design
"Architecture and Design: Solutions to Crowding." Corrections Today, vol. SO, no. 2 (April 1988). 199 pp. American
Correctional Association, 8025 Laurel Lakes Court, Laurel,
:MD 20707. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ
110579.
Twenty-three articles discuss various aspects of building
correctional facilities quickly and efficiently, without
sacrificing quality, to help relieve prison crowding
rapidly and without excessive costs.

Comparison of "Direct" and "Indirect" Supervision
Correctional Facilities, Final Report. 1989. 107 pp. Jay
Farbstein and Associates, Inc., San Obispo, CA 93401.
National Institute of Corrections, Prison Division, Washington, DC 20534. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan.
NCJ 120820.
Data from a mail survey and case studies of direct and
indirect supervision jails and prisons formed the basis of
a comparison of the two approaches in terms of their
costs, staff impacts, safety and security, behavior in
relationship to the physical environment, design issues,
and overcrowding.
Correctional Facility Planning and Design, Second Edition.
J. Farbstein. 1986. 396 pp. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 135
West 50th Street, New York, NY 10020. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 104227.
These step-by-step guidelines give local officials detailed
information on planning new jail construction or making
major renovations to existing facilities.
Design Considerations in the Building of Women's Prisons.
S.V. Carp and J.A. Davis. 104 pp. National Institute of
Corrections, Washington, DC 20534. NCJRS availability:
Interlibrary loan, copy reproduction, and microfiche. NCJ
131813.
Issues specific to the design of a correctional facility for
women are discussed with emphasis on the need to
support programming that recognizes and addresses
female offenders' roles as parents, their histories of
abuse, and their involvement with crime because of their
distorted perceptions of their relationships with men.

NII/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Design, Equipment, Construction and Other Blunders in
Detention and Correctional Facilities. J.R. Rowan. 1990.
14 pp. Juvenile and Criminal Justice International, Inc.,
Roseville, MN 55113. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan
and microfiche. NCJ 123655.
This study consists of interviews and onsite surveys at
correctional facilities at the State and local level to
determine the extent to which faulty facility design and
construction have threatened operations and life-safety.
Design Resource File: A Guide to Information/or Architects
Designing Justice Facilities. 1988. 115 pp. American
Institute of Architects, Washington, DC 20006. NCJRS
availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 118733.
This guide provides resources to assist in the design of
criminal justice facilities, a glossary of corrections
terminology, and an outline for courtroom planning. The
planning and design of law enforcement, judicial, and
correctional facilities are described.
"Designing Tomorrow's Jails." J.T. Potter. American Jails,
vol. 4, no. 3 (September/October 1990). 8 pp. American Jail
Association, 1000 Day Road, Suite 100, Hagerstown, MD
21740. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 132389.
The advantages and disadvantages of three types of jail
designs (linear intermittent supervision, podular indirect
supervision, and podular direct supervision) are discussed regarding new construction.

Federal Prisons: Revised Design Standards Could Save
Expansion Funds. 1991. 18 pp. U.S. General Accounting
Office, Document Handling and Information Services
Facility, P.O. Box 6015, Gaithersburg, MD 20877. NCJRS
availability: Interlibrary loan. NO 129936.
Federal prison crowding and plans for expanding
correctional facilities were studied with emphasis on
whether the Federal Bureau of Prisons is using reasonable and cost-effective measures of capacity in
determining the extent of crowding and the need for
additional facilities.
Guidelines for Reducing the Liability for Inmate Suicide.
R. Atlas. 1987. 31 pp. Atlas and Associates, 600 Northeast
36th Street, Suite 1522, Miami, FL 33137. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NO 107383.
This manual examines prior research on suicides in jails
and lockups, explores the responsibilities of the supervising agency, discusses several case studies, and presents
architectural and management strategies to reduce the
desire and opportunity to commit suicide.

N/J/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Jails: Reform and the New Generation Philosophy. L.L.
Zupan. 1991. 196 pp. National Institute of Corrections.
Anderson Publishing Company, 2035 Reading Road,
Cincinnati, OH 45202. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan.
NO 126941.
The evaluations presented focus on how the ''new
generation" (podular/direct supervision) jail philosophy
is implemented in jail architectural design and inmate
management style and how the philosophy affects the
quality of institutional life for inmates and staff.
More For Less: Jail Construction Cost Management
Handbook 1987. 161 pp. Kitchell CEM, Sacramento;CA
95816. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 127977.
This handbook is designed to assist California's local
governments in designing and constructing cost-effective
jails.
Prison Expansion: Program to Identify DOD Property for
Prison Use Could Be Improved. 1990. 44 pp. U.S. General
Accounting Office, General Government Division, Washington, DC 20548. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan and
microfiche. NCJ 128034.
An analysis of actions taken by Federal agencies to
ensure that military property is considered for conversion
to minimum security prisons as an alternative to new
prison construction found that as of September 1990 no
military property had been identified that will be
converted to prison use.
Small Jail Design Guide: A Planning and Design Resource
for Local Facilities of Up to 50 Beds. 1988. 440 pp.
National Institute of Corrections, Jail Division, Boulder, CO
80301. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 114582.
This manual uses the results of a survey of 255 jails of
50 beds or fewer as the basis of a discussion of the
operational and design issues that must be addressed for
each functional component of a small jail.
What Is the Future of the "New Generation Jail" in California? C.S. Koehler. 1987. 134 pp. California Commission
on Peace Officers Standards and Training Center for Executive Development, 1601 Alhambra Boulevard, Sacramento,
CA 95816. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan and
microfiche. NO I 11021.
This paper surveys new jail construction in California to
ascertain the impact of the "new generation" jail technology on the future of corrections.

351

Siting and Community Impact

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of a State Prison Near Wasco,
Kern County. LL. Parks, E.M. Lofting, and C.E. Davis.

Comparative Analysis ofProperty Values in the Vicinity of
New Correctional Facilities at the Oshkosh Correctional
Institution and Its Relationship to the Proposed Racine
Correctional Institution. 1987. 12 pp. Howard, Needles,

1988. 80 pp. Engineering-Economics Associates, Inc.,
Berkeley, CA 94707. California Department of Corrections,
Sacramento, CA 95814. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary
loan. NCJ 115503.
This study evaluated the economic and fiscal impacts of
a proposed State prison facility near Wasco in Kem
County, California.

Tammen, and Bergendoff, 1127 West Park Place, Milwaukee, WI 53224. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ
114940.
This study of the potential effects on surrounding
neighborhood property values of the construction of a
new prison at the St. Bonaventure site in Sturtevant
(Wisconsin) uses an appropriate parallel case for
comparison.

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of a State Prison at Dela,w,
Kern County. L.L. Parks, E.M. Lofting, and C.E. Davis.
1988. 105 pp. Engineering-Economics Associates, Inc.,
Berkeley, CA 94707. California Department of Corrections,
Sacramento, CA 95814. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary
loan. NCJ 115504.
This study evaluated the economic and fiscal impacts of
a proposed State prison for men near Delano in Kem
County, California.

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of a State Prison in Madera
County. L.L. Parks and E.M. Lofting. 1987. 66 pp.
Engineering-Economics Associates, Inc., Berkeley, CA
94707. California Department of Corrections, Sacramento,
CA 95814. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NO
115508.
This study evaluated the economic and fiscal impacts of
a proposed State prison for women to be constructed
between Madera City and Chowchilla in Madera
County, California.
"Effects of Prison Siting Practices on Community Status
Arrangements: A Framework Applied to the Siting of
California State Prisons." J.D. Krause. 1992. 29 pp. Crime
and Delinquency, vol. 38, no. 1, special issue (January 1992).
NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 135968.
This article contends that positive relations between
prison facilities and the community promote the quality
of life of correctional staff, inmates being reintegrated,
and noncorrectional community members.

352

Impact of Correctional Facilities on Land Values and Public
Policy. K.S. Abrams and W. Lyons. 1987. 600 pp. Rorida
International University, FAV-FIU, Joint Center for Environmental and Urban Problems, North Miami, FL 33181.
National Institute of Corrections, Washington, DC 20534.
NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NO 127852.
This study investigated the popularly held notions that
the presence of a correctional facility in a community
creates a risk to public safety, lowers nearby property
values, and reduces the community's quality of life.

Impacts of a New Prison on a Small Town: Twice Blessed or
Double Whammy? K.A. Carlson. 1990. 282 pp. Clallam
County Sheriff's Department, Port Angeles, WA 98362.
National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC 20531. NCJRS
availability: Interlibrary loan, microfiche, and copy reproduction. NCJ 128309.
The initial impacts of a new medium-security prison on
a small, rural Washington community were analyzed
during a period starting in August 1985 just before the
completion of construction through September 1989.

Prison Impacts: A Review of the Research. K.A. Carlson.
1989. 23 pp. Peninsula College, Port Angeles, WA 98362.
National Institute of Justice, Washington DC 20531. NCJRS
availability: Interlibrary loan and microfiche. NO 120517.
This review of the research on the impact of a prison on
the community in which it is located concludes that the
community and prison sizes, the prison's location in
relation to inmate and employee origins, and four other
factors all influence the direction of the impacts.

State Environmental Quality Review: Notice of Completion of
Final Environmental Impact Statement. 1987. 11 pp. New
York State Department of Correctional Services, Division of
Program Planning, Research and Evaluation, Albany, NY
12226. NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. ·No 108460.
This final report describes the environmental impact of a
proposed 700-bed, medium-security correctional facility
to be built on an 81.3-acre site in Ogdensburg, New
York.

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

l

Department of Defense, Washington, DC 20301. Bureau of
Prisons and Bureau of Justice Assistance, Washington, DC.
NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 124375.
This manual summarizes the ways in which Federal,
State, and local governments have acquired 14 former
military properties and used them as 19 separate
correctional facilities.

Prison Financing and Construction Plan, State of Texas.
R. Scott. 1987. 48 pp. Texas Criminal Justice Division,
P.O. Box 13084, Austin, TX 78711. NCJRS availability:
Interlibrary loan, copy reproduction, and microfiche. NCJ
112057.
From 1980 to 1986, total admissions to Texas prisons
rose by 122.8 percent, while prison capacity increased by
only 51.5 percent. Ruiz-mandated depopulation agreements will reduce capacity further in 1987-1989.

Finance Methods

Standards

Approaches/or Capital Cost Avoidance in State Correctional
Facility Construction. S.A. Carter. 1987. 15 pp. Carter-

Goble Associates, Inc., Columbia, SC 29201. National
Conference of State Legislatures. NCJRS availability:
Interlibrary loan. NCJ 127870.
State legislatures should evaluate every feasible means
of avoiding excessive capital costs for new correctional
facilities, while providing safe and humane institutions
that meet constitutionally mandated requirements.

Correctional Standards Review and Evaluation. 1991. 114
pp. American Correctional Association, 8025 Laurel Lakes
Court, Laurel, MD 20707. National Institute of Justice.
NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan, copy reproduction, and
microfiche. NCJ 131239.
This final report on the review and evaluations of revised
National Correctional Standards and Accreditation
includes the first draft and camera-ready copy of a study
of the cost implications of the third edition.

Constructing Correctional Facilities: ls There a Role/or the
Private Sector? 1987. 60 pp. Brookings Institution, 1775

Standards for Building Materials, Equipment, and Systems
Used in Detention and Correctional Facilities. R.D. Dikkers

Massachusetts Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20036.
NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 111104.
Conference proceedings.

and S.C. Reeder. 1987. 105 pp. U.S. Department of
Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Center for
Building Technology, Washington,DC 20534. National
Institute of Corrections, Washington, DC 20534. NCJRS
availability: Interlibrary loan. NCI 127937.
This study develops guidelines, tests methods, and sets
technical bases for standards that can assist in the
selection, application, and maintenance of building
materials, equipment, and systems for use in detention
and correctional facilities.

Using Former Military Installations as Correctional Facilities. 1990. 66 pp. Office of Economic Adjusnnent, U.S.

Dollars and Sense: Cost-Cutting Strategies for Correctional
Facilities in the 90' sand Beyond. D.N. Sandberg. 1990. 35

pp. American Institute of Architects, Committee on Architecture for Justice, Washington, DC 20006. NCJRS
availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 128843.
A 1990 conference sponsored by the American Institute
of Architects Committee on Architecture for Justice
brought architects, officials of State and Federal corrections agencies, and planners together to discuss the
current and future needs of correctional systems and
strategies for increasing the cost-effectiveness of
correctional facilities.
"Lease/Purchase Option Solves Financial Dilemmas."
M. Scott and M. Gotschall. Corrections Today, vol. 51, no. 2
(April 1989). 3 pp. American Correctional Association,
8025 Laurel Lakes Court, Laurel, MD 20707. NCJRS
availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 129554.
Lease/purchase has emerged as an attractive alternative
for corrections agencies as well as municipal issuers with
important financing needs.

NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

Standards Sketchbook: Cost Implications of Third Edition
Standards for Adult Correctional Institutions. 1990. 80 pp.

Community Resource Services, Inc., Kents Hill, ME 04349.
NCJRS availability: Interlibrary loan and microfiche. NCJ
127478.
These drawings, tables, and accompanying text describe
the differences between the second and third editions of
the American Correctional Association's standards for
adult correctional institutions, illustrate the design
implications of both sets of standards, and portray the
range of practice that might be possible under the old and
new standards.

353

Technical Criteria for Detention and Correctional Facilities.
241 pp. Alberta Public Works, Supply and Service Capital
Development, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 5A9.
NORS availability: Interlibrary loan. NCJ 125834.
This report represents minimum standards for security in·
the design and construction of detention and correctional
facilities in Alberta, Canada.

Explanation of Availability
NCJRS Document Loan Program. Documents in the
collection are available through interlibrary loan for a
transaction fee of $4.50 per document ($5.00 U.S. funds for
Canadian borrowers). NCJRS lends documents only to other
libraries. To initiate a document loan, contact your local
public library or agency library. Include full title(s) and NCJ
number(s) on a standard four-part ALA form. Libraries
exempt from the interlibrary loan fee include Federal
libraries, State and local criminal justice libraries, and
members of the Criminal Justice Information Exchange
Group.
NCJRS Microfiche Program. Selected documents in the
collection are available from NCJRS on microfiche. Micro.fiche documents may be purchased for $2.00 per title.
NCJRS Copy Reproduction. NCJRS will photocopy
documents with no copyright restrictions on a cost-recovery
basis ($5.00 a document, 10 cents per page).
For further assistance, contact the Construction Information
Exchange: NlJ/NORS, Box 6000, Rockville, MD 20850;
800--851-3420.

*U.S. G.P.0.:1993-342-496:84297

354

. NIJ/National Directory of Corrections Construction

NIJ's Construction
Information Exchange . • •
Bringing corrections officials fresh insight to help
plan, finance, design, and build prisons and jails
As a result of an extensive data-gathering effort, NIJ's Construction Information
Exchange (CIE) has for the first time collected information on:
■

Secure areas of facilities that have law enforcement or court components within them.

■

Facilities serving special inmate populations such as drug offenders, females, elderly
inmates, and inmates who are HIV positive.

■

Facilities using closed-circuit television, perimeter detection/alarm(s). satellite or
cable communication, paging or sound systems, and other systems using advanced
technologies.

■

Land acquisition costs, equipment and furnishing purchases, site development and
acreage, financing methods, and location-specific information.

Corrections officials! This is only a fraction of the information available through the Exchange. CIE 's services and resources can also help you:
Access up-to-date and cost-oriented data.
Updated regularly, the Construction Data Base now includes information on more than 500 facilities nationwide. The full array
of data supplied by the architects and facility administrators for each completed and operational prison and jail is included,
ranging from design concepts, construction costs, and financing methods to staffing levels, cell capacity,
inmate profiles, and operational costs. Selected information from the data base is available in book form,
with floorplans, in the National Directory of Corrections Construction.

Benefit from the experiences and approaches of other corrections officials.
The Construction Reference and Referral Service has specialists who can locate answers to your
questions or refer you to knowledgeable sources. The specialists also link coordinators of
corrections conferences to resources helpful in planning and publicizing events.

Learn how to save construction time and money.
Construction Bulletins highlight critical corrections issues and provide
case studies of selected construction projects. The Bulletins describe new
time- and cost-saving building techniques, creative partnerships, and
financing methods.

To tap into this unique network for corrections information,
call 800-851-3420 or write to Construction Information
Exchange, National Institute of Justice/NCJRS, Box 6000,
Rockville, MD 20850.

U.S. Department of !ustice
Office of Justice Programs
National Institute ofJustice

BULK RATE

POSTAQE&FEESPAID.
DOJ/ND
Permit No. G-91

J

Washington, D.C. 20531
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

NCJ 142525