Skip navigation
Disciplinary Self-Help Litigation Manual - Header

Articles by Douglas Ankney

Connecticut Supreme Court Rejects Davis and Announces State Constitution Requires Police to Clarify Ambiguous Request for Counsel Before Continuing Interrogation

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Connecticut held that the state constitution requires police to clarify an ambiguous request for counsel before continuing to interrogate a suspect.

In 2013, Robert John Purcell was arrested on multiple counts of sexual assault and risk of injury to a child. After Purcell ...

Flipping the Bird, Even Toward a Cop, Is a Constitutionally Protected Right

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed that raising one’s middle finger without the four other fingers showing is an expression protected by the First Amendment.

In doing so, the Court also affirmed the district court’s denial of Officer Matthew Wayne Minard’s plea of ...

Delaware Supreme Court: ‘The Sixth Amendment Demands More Than the Presence the Morning of Trial of a Warm Body With a Law Degree’

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Delaware ruled that an attorney’s limited pretrial contact deprived a defendant of effective assistance of counsel.

Everett Urquhart was charged with numerous felonies, including first-degree robbery. A witness saw the vehicle that had been loaned to Urquhart fleeing the area at the time ...

Fourth Circuit Holds 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) is Unconstitutional

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that the definition of a “crime of violence” in 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(3)(B)—commonly referred to as the “residual clause”—is  unconstitutional for vagueness.

Joseph Decore Simms pointed a gun at the manager of a ...

Fourth Circuit: District Court Must Provide Rationale When Denying Motion for § 3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that a district court must provide its rationale when denying a motion seeking a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). 

In this case, the Court consolidated the appeals of Paulette Martin and Luis Felipe ...

Fourth Circuit: Unreasonable Post-Seizure Delay in Obtaining Warrant Requires Suppression of Evidence

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a 31-day delay in obtaining a search warrant after seizing a defendant’s cellphone, without reasonable justification, violates the Fourth Amendment and requires suppression of the evidence obtained from the phone.

Samuel Pratt was suspected by the ...

Georgia Supreme Court Announces Statute Mandating Lifetime GPS Monitoring of ‘Sexually Dangerous Predator’ Even After Completion of Sentence Is Facially Unconstitutional

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Georgia held the state statute authorizing the lifetime global positioning system (“GPS”) monitoring of persons determined to be a “Sexually Dangerous Person” (“SDP”) but who are no longer serving their sentences is unconstitutional.

In 2003, Joseph Park was convicted of numerous sexual offenses. ...

Fourth Circuit: South Carolina Conviction for Assaulting, Wounding, or Beating Officer While Resisting Arrest Is Not Predicate Violent Felony Conviction Under ACCA

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a conviction for assaulting, beating, or wounding a law enforcement officer while resisting arrest (“ABWO”) in violation of South Carolina Code § 16-9-320(B) (“ABWO statute”) is not a predicate offense because it does not satisfy the ...

Second Circuit: Government’s Misleading Disclosure Warrants New Trial

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that the Government violated Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure when its misleading disclosure caused the defense to forego filing a motion to suppress the defendant’s statement. The Court vacated the district court’s decision ...

Why Brady Lists Still Don’t Work

by Douglas Ankney

Lists of discredited police officers whom prosecutors refuse to call as witnesses are known as Brady lists. These lists could play an important role in ensuring the criminal justice system is fair by tracking and exposing police officers who lie or engage in unethical behavior.

Unfortunately, these ...

 

 

Federal Prison Handbook - Side
Advertise Here 3rd Ad
Disciplinary Self-Help Litigation Manual - Side