Skip navigation
PYHS - Header

Articles by Douglas Ankney

NYPD’s Solution for Abusive Cops Who Cost Taxpayers Millions of Dollars in Civil Suits—Promote Them

by Douglas Ankney

The New York Police Department (“NYPD”) hired David Grieco as an officer in 2006. Earning the street name “Bullethead,” Grieco was named in 17 lawsuits between his hiring and his first promotion in 2016. Although payouts to settle suits naming Grieco as a defendant exceeded $1 million, ...

California Court of Appeal: Confrontation Clause Violated Where Defense Prohibited From Cross-Examining Prosecution Witness About Biased Motivation and Fabrication

by Douglas Ankney

The Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, held that Cecilio Castaneda-Prado’s right to confront his accusers was violated when the superior court prohibited his attorney from cross-examining a prosecution witness about biased motivation and fabrication after the witness had testified at the preliminary hearing that ...

Fourth Circuit: Evidentiary Hearing Required Where Prisoner’s Allegation of Mental Illness, if True, Is Sufficient to Demonstrate ‘Extraordinary Circumstances’ Warranting Both Rule 60(b)(6) Relief and Tolling of Habeas SOL

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that an evidentiary hearing was required where Berman Justus, Jr.’s, allegation of mental illness, if true, was sufficient to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances warranting relief under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and equitable tolling ...

Study Reveals That Aging Federal Judges May Experience Cognitive Impairment Affecting Their Opinions

by Douglas Ankney

According to a recent study titled The Effects of Lifetime Tenure and Aging in the United States Federal Judiciary (“Study”), as federal judges age, they may experience a decline in their cognitive abilities that affects their written opinions.

The Study, authored by Ryan Owens of the University ...

Eleventh Circuit Announces Defendant May Not Be Sentenced to Home Confinement for Violating Terms of Supervised Release When Sentenced to Statutory Maximum Period of Imprisonment for the Violation

by Douglas Ankney

In a case of first impression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the revised sentences of defendants who violate the terms of their supervised release cannot include the maximum term of imprisonment and a period of home confinement because “home confinement with ...

Third Circuit: Pennsylvania Conviction for First-Degree Aggravated Assault Does Not Require Physical Force so Is Not Qualifying Predicate for ACCA Purposes

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that because a conviction under Pennsylvania’s first-degree aggravated assault statute, 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2702(a)(1), does not require the element of physical force, such a conviction cannot serve as a qualifying predicate for purposes of the Armed ...

Indiana Supreme Court Reverses Involuntary Manslaughter Conviction Where Trial Court Denied Defense Counsel Opportunity to Directly Voir Dire Prospective Jurors

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Indiana reversed Kyle N. Doroszko’s involuntary manslaughter conviction because the trial court denied defense counsel the opportunity to voir dire prospective jurors directly in violation of Indiana Trial Rule 47(D).

During a prearranged marijuana transaction, Traychon Taylor attempted to rob Doroszko. A struggle ...

Fourth Circuit: Disparate Sentence of 30 Years for Two § 924(c) Convictions Constitutes ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reason’ for Early Release and § 3553(a) Sentencing Factors ‘Overwhelmingly’ Favor Sentence Reduction

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that Kelvin Brown’s disparate sentence of 30 years on two convictions for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) created an “extraordinary and compelling reason” for his early release, and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors overwhelmingly favored a sentence ...

Fourth Circuit Reverses § 924(c) Conviction Because Kidnapping No Longer Qualifies as Predicate Offense and ‘Critical Record Documents’ Do Not Show Firearm Charge Was ‘Expressly Predicated Upon’ Any Other Offense

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed Elliott B. Graham’s 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction for “using a firearm during a crime of violence” because (1) the conviction was predicated upon a kidnapping conviction, (2) kidnapping is no longer considered a qualifying predicate crime of ...

Fifth Circuit: Fourth Amendment Seizure Occurred When Officer Pulled Behind Parked Vehicle, Activated Emergency Lights, and Simultaneously Ordered Suspect to Remain in Vehicle

by Douglas Ankney

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a Fourth Amendment seizure occurred when an officer, with emergency lights activated, pulled in behind Jacob Boone Wright’s vehicle and almost simultaneously ordered him to remain in his car to which Wright sufficiently complied.

Officer Jakobsohn ...

 

 

Federal Prison Handbook - Side
Advertise Here 3rd Ad
PLN Subscribe Now Ad