×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Washington Supreme Court: Judgment and Sentence Facially Invalid Based on Miscalculated Offender Score Despite Defendant’s Stipulation to Exceptional Sentence
Loaded on Dec. 1, 2024
by Sam Rutherford
published in Criminal Legal News
December, 2024, page 45
Filed under:
Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
Location:
Washington.
by Sam Rutherford
The Supreme Court of Washington held that a defendant’s judgment and sentence was facially invalid and thus exempt from the one-year time limit for seeking postconviction relief where it included several “washed out” prior juvenile offenses in the offender score calculation which in turn resulted in an ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Forensic Genetic Genealogy: Police Are Searching Genetic Genealogy Companies’ Databases Regardless of Whether They Have Permission, by Ann Foster, Matthew Clarke
- Montana Supreme Court: Expert Witness Testimony Presented Via Two-Way Video Conferencing Technology Violates Confrontation Clause, by Sam Rutherford
- Indigent Defense: Appointed Counsel Does Not Mean Free Counsel, by David Reutter
- Parole Rate Plummets in South Carolina, by Matthew Clarke
- Washington Supreme Court Announces Prohibition Against Use of ‘In-Court Holding Cell’ for Court Proceedings Without Individualized Determination of Need, by Sam Rutherford
- False Confessions and Wrongful Convictions: Known Causes and Steps to Eliminate Them, by Douglas Ankney
- Federal Court Rules Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Laws Violate Constitution, by Dale Chappell
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Announces Prosecution’s Duty to Provide Discoverable Evidence Upon Request Applies to Discoverable Items in Law Enforcement Agencies’ Possession Unbeknownst to Prosecution and Exclusion Is Appropriate Remedy for Violation, by Sam Rutherford
- Second Circuit Holds Full De Novo Resentencing Hearing Required Based on Partially Successful Habeas Petition Where Resentencing Judge Not Original Judge and Changed Circumstances Plausibly Alleged, by Sam Rutherford
- Michigan Supreme Court: Fundamentally Unfair to Deny Indigent Defendant Funds to Retain False Confession Expert Where Genuineness of Confession Key Issue at Trial, by Sam Rutherford
- Ninth Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to California Prisoner on Napue Claim Because Prosecution Failed to Correct Informant’s False Testimony That He Did Not Receive Any Benefit In Exchange for His Testimony, by Sam Rutherford
- Nevada Supreme Court Announces Incorporated Probable Cause Affidavit Cannot Broaden Scope of Warrant’s Description of Places and Persons to be Searched or Items to Be Seized, by Anthony Accurso
- Wrongfully Convicted Actor Exonerated After 24 Years in Prison
- Missouri Man Awarded Record $38 Million After Insurance Company Refuses to Pay Wrongful Conviction Settlement, by Sam Rutherford
- California Supreme Court Announces Uncharged and Unproven Offense-Specific Enhancements May Not Be Imposed Under § 1172.6(e) Resentencing, by Sam Rutherford
- Arkansas Supreme Court Announces Petition for Testing Forensic Evidence Based on Advances in Technology Under Act 1780 of 2001 May Be Filed by Anyone Convicted of a Crime, Not Just Those Still in State Custody, by Anthony Accurso
- Rhode Island Supreme Court: Officer Lacked Reasonable Suspicion for Terry Stop Based on Unsubstantiated, Anonymous Tip, by Sam Rutherford
- Third Circuit: Despite ‘Expressly and Repeatedly’ Requesting Low-End Sentence, Government Breached Plea Agreement by Emphasizing ‘Heinous’ Nature of Offense and Presenting Victim-Impact Evidence at Sentencing Thereby Undermining Recommendation, by Sam Rutherford
- Indiana Supreme Court: Defendant Entitled to Discharge by Showing No Court ‘Congestion’ After Trial Court’s Unexplained Denial of Speedy Trial Motion, by Sam Rutherford
- Mississippi Supreme Court: Defendant’s Guilty Plea Not Knowing and Voluntary Because He Was Not Informed of His Habitual Offender Status, by Sam Rutherford
- Washington Supreme Court: Judgment and Sentence Facially Invalid Based on Miscalculated Offender Score Despite Defendant’s Stipulation to Exceptional Sentence, by Sam Rutherford
- Cell-Site Simulator Proposal: A Glimpse Inside the Black Box Whose Secrets Are Protected by NDAs and Obfuscation, by Michael Thompson
- Chula Vista’s Police Drones, by Michael Thompson
- News In Brief
More from Sam Rutherford:
- Ninth and Tenth Circuits Find Bivens Extension Orders Not Immediately Appealable, March 1, 2025
- New Mexico Corrections Department Continues Pattern of Abuse With Contract Medical Provider Wexford Health Sources, Feb. 15, 2025
- Hawai’i Supreme Court Reverses Murder Conviction for Prosecutorial Misconduct Based on Prosecution’s Improper Statements During Closing Arguments, Feb. 15, 2025
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025
- Fourth Circuit Decision on Claim of Retaliation for Exercising First And Sixth Amendment Rights Highlights Police Corruption, Feb. 15, 2025
- Washington DOC Physician Assistant Surrenders Medical License in Wake of Malpractice Allegations, Feb. 15, 2025
- California Court of Appeal Announces Defendants May Obtain Brady Evidence From Police Officers’ Personnel Files in Advance of § 1172.6 Hearing Requesting Vacatur of Conviction and Resentencing for Certain Types of Murder Convictions, Feb. 15, 2025
- Massachusetts Supreme Court Vacates Threat-Based Conviction on First Amendment Grounds Because Jury Instructions Failed to Include Mens Rea Element Mandated by Counterman for ‘True-Threat’ Conviction, Feb. 15, 2025
- California Court of Appeal Announces Equal Protection Entitles Youth Offenders Convicted of Special Circumstances Murder Predicated on Robbery or Burglary to Franklin and Parole Hearings Under Cal. Penal Code § 3051, Feb. 15, 2025
- Law Enforcement Obscures Use of Facial Recognition Technology, Feb. 15, 2025
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Clarifies ‘Implicit Breach’ Case Law Regarding When Government Breaches Plea Agreement by Responding to Defendant’s Request for Downward Variant Sentence, Oct. 1, 2024. Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Breach of Plea/Coop./Immunity Agreements, Breach of trust, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- First Circuit Holds Government Breached Plea Agreement With Defendant by Failing to Explain Why It Agreed to Substantial Downward-Variant Sentence, Sept. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Third Circuit: Pennsylvania Second-Degree Aggravated Assault of a Protected Individual Not a ‘Violent Felony’ Under ACCA, Court Acknowledges ‘Bizarre Result’, Sept. 1, 2023. Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Protected Persons, Sentence Enhancements/Departures.
- Tenth Circuit Joins Other Circuits, Holding Federal Offense of Conviction, Not Underlying Conduct, Determines First Step Act Eligibility, Sept. 15, 2021. First Step Act, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- Massachusetts Supreme Court Announces ‘Habitual Offender’ Statute Allows for Sentence of Probation Only, March 15, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Sentence of Probation.
- Fourth Circuit: Erroneous Career Offender Sentence Correctable in First Step Act Resentencing, July 15, 2020. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- Smith v. Stegall, No. 02-2441 (6th Cir.) (385 F.3d 993) (August 4, 2004) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman), Nov. 1, 2004. Punch And Jurists, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- U.S. v. Redemann, No. 03-CR-71 (E.D.Wisc.) (295 F.Supp.2d 887) (December 4, 2003) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman), Feb. 1, 2004. Punch And Jurists, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- U.S. v. Snyder, No. 00-1043 (1st Cir.) (235 F.3d 42) (December 21, 2000) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch), Feb. 1, 2001. Punch And Jurists, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- U.S. v. Brown, No. 99-6152 (11th Cir.) (224 F.3d 1237) (August 18, 2000) (Judge Charles R. Wilson), Oct. 1, 2000. Punch And Jurists, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
