Skip navigation
Criminal Legal News
PYHS - Header
× You have 2 more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.

Geofencing Warrants Are Putting Civil Rights and Free Speech in Jeopardy

Loaded on March 15, 2022 by Dale Chappell published in Criminal Legal News April, 2022, page 48
Filed under: First Amendment, rights, Electronic Surveillance. Location: Wisconsin.

by Dale Chappell

Hundreds of protestors marched in Kenosha, Wisconsin, after the police shooting of Jacob Blake in August 2020. Little did these protestors know that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms issued at least a dozen geofence warrants to gather data from their electronic devices they carried that day, even if they didn’t break any laws. Critics charge this type of digital harassment chills constitutionally protected speech and prevents the public from holding the government accountable.

A geofence warrant requires a company to disclose personal information to the police that the company obtains from any electronic devices in the area covered by the warrant. These warrants usually reach a broad range of people, from tens to hundreds, in a given area and are not unlike a “dragnet” of sorts to target a large group of people. Some say it’s not any different from a “general warrant,” which the First Amendment was designed to prohibit.

The information gathered in the geofence warrants issued to Google during the Kenosha protests, for instance, included email addresses, phone numbers, and any information on Google’s services used by the device owner. It exposes the intimate details of the protestors who were ensnared in the geofence warrants issued. Google, the only company that is known to provide data in response to these warrants, provided information that police have issued at least 20,000 warrants in the last three years to their company.

Another problem with geofence warrants is that a vast majority of them remain sealed and out of the public’s knowledge. That means the public has no idea when the police—the very people the public may be trying to hold accountable through public demonstrations—are gathering their personal information in an attempt to retaliate and silence these protests. 

Source: eff.org

As a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. A Guide to Getting the Most Out of a Plea Bargain, by Jacob Barrett
  2. Second Circuit: District Court Required to Explain Rationale for Reducing Sentence to ‘Time Served’ Under First Step Act but Refused to Reduce Supervised Release Portion of Sentence Despite Being Longer Than New Mandatory Minimum, by Dale Chappell
  3. What You Need to Know Before Contacting a Conviction Integrity Unit, by Kia Hall Hayes, Marissa Boyers Bluestine
  4. Study Examines the ‘Black Box’ of Prosecutorial Charging and Plea Bargaining Discretion, by David Reutter
  5. Man Rejects Plea Deal and Is Sentenced to 110 Years in Colorado Prison for Doing So, by Ashleigh Dye
  6. Systematic Lying in Plea Bargaining Is a Feature, Not a Flaw, by David Reutter
  7. Iowa Supreme Court Clarifies When Forensic Interviews of Child Complaining Witnesses Are Admissible, by Douglas Ankney
  8. Sixth Circuit: Government Violated Plea Agreement by Arguing for Sentence Exceeding Guidelines Range, Despite Promise Not to ‘Suggest in Any Way’ Variance Is Appropriate, by David Reutter
  9. Tenth Circuit: Where Defendant Actually Sentenced to Drug Treatment and Probation Rather Than 28-32 Months in Prison as Per State Sentencing Guidelines, Conviction Can’t Serve as Predicate ‘Felony’ for 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), by Dale Chappell
  10. ACLU Report Suggests Disturbing Pattern of Police Surveilling Protests to Identify People Peacefully Protesting Police Brutality
  11. Plea Bargaining: An Illegitimate System to Administer Justice?, by David Reutter
  12. First Circuit: Appellate Counsel’s Failure to Raise Brady Claim on Direct Appeal Constituted Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Under Strickland, § 2255 Motion Granted, by Anthony Accurso
  13. Ending Eyewitness Memory Contamination, by Matthew Clarke
  14. Fourth Circuit: Bodily Injury Sentence Enhancement for Robbery Inapplicable Where Victim Sustained ‘Momentary’ Injury and Sought ‘Precautionary’ Medical Treatment, by Jacob Barrett
  15. Iowa Supreme Court Reverses Conviction Where Prosecutor Allowed to Amend Trial Information at Trial to Charge a ‘Wholly New and Different Offense’, by David Reutter
  16. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals: Trial Court Did Not Abuse Discretion by Granting Rule 508 Motion to Dismiss Capital Murder Charge Where State Refused to Disclose Identity of Confidential Informant, by Douglas Ankney
  17. Vermont Supreme Court Announces Rule 12.1 Doesn’t Require Notice of Diminished Capacity Defense When Expert Testimony Won’t Be Used, by Matthew Clarke
  18. California Court of Appeal: Hearing on Discretionary Resentencing Under §1170.91(b)(1) for U.S. Servicemembers Requires Only That Petition Allege Defendant ‘May’ Be Suffering From a ‘Qualifying Condition’, by Douglas Ankney
  19. Fifth Circuit: Aggravated Assault in Texas Does Not Qualify as Aggravated Felony Under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), Reentry With Prior Aggravated Felony, by Jacob Barrett
  20. Massachusetts Supreme Court: Prosecution Failed to Prove Defendant Knowingly, Voluntarily, and Intelligently Waived Right to Counsel After Having Asked for Lawyer Earlier But Officer Continued to Engage in ‘General’ Talk for Nearly 45 Minutes, by Anthony Accurso
  21. Third Circuit, Joining Every Other Circuit That’s Addressed the Issue, Holds Hobbs Act Robbery Does Not Qualify as ‘Crime of Violence’, by David Reutter
  22. A ‘Lucky’ Exoneration in Syracuse, by Jayson Hawkins
  23. Ninth Circuit Announces Irizarry Didn’t Eliminate Wise Requirement That Sentencing Court Provide Notice of Special Conditions of Supervised Release Prior to Imposing Sentence, by Matthew Clarke
  24. Maryland Prosecutor Covers for FBI Agent’s Lies in Defense of Junk Science, by Jayson Hawkins
  25. SCOTUS Rejects ‘Opening the Door’ Rule to Correct ‘Misleading Impression’ as Exception to Confrontation Clause Allowing Admission of Unconfronted Testimonial Hearsay, by Richard Resch
  26. North Dakota Supreme Court Suppresses Evidence Found in Passenger’s Backpack Located Outside Vehicle When Drug-Detection Dog Alerted to Presence of Drugs Inside Vehicle, by Anthony Accurso
  27. Fear and Freedom Twenty Years Later: How Post 9/11 Security Measures Overstepped Privacy, by Ashleigh Dye
  28. FBI Program Surveils Subject for 24 Days Using Spy Planes, by Anthony Accurso
  29. California Court of Appeal Announces Suffering From a Nonqualifying Mental Disorder While Also Suffering From a Qualifying Disorder Does Not Bar Eligibility for Mental Health Diversion Under § 1001.36, by Anthony Accurso
  30. Google Confirms Increasing Police Reliance on Geofence Warrants, by Anthony Accurso
  31. Pandemic Pressures Defendants into False Guilty Pleas, by David Reutter
  32. Search Your Constitution in Vain for the Fourth Amendment—the DOJ Seized It (Stealthily), by Douglas Ankney
  33. NYPD Using Secret Money for Surveillance Tech, by Anthony Accurso
  34. Dangers of Data Gathering by Los Angeles Police Department, by Edward Lyon
  35. Geofencing Warrants Are Putting Civil Rights and Free Speech in Jeopardy, by Dale Chappell
  36. Oregon Bans Police Lying to Obtain Confessions from Juveniles, by Jacob Barrett
  37. ‘Possible Cause’ Is All That’s Needed for Geofence Warrants, by Douglas Ankney
  38. News in Brief
  39. Police Disparage Philadelphia Citizenry with False Report That SEPTA Riders Stood Idle While Passenger was Raped, by Douglas Ankney

More from Dale Chappell:

More from these topics:

 

 

The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel Side
Advertise here
The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel Side