Skip navigation
The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel - Header
× You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Clarifies Ex Post Facto Analysis Focuses on When, Not Where, Crime Occurred and Does Not Require Showing of Disadvantage to Defendant

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that the state’s sex-offender registry law constitutes punishment when imposed retroactively to sex offenders who committed their offenses prior to the law’s enactment and whose triggering offenses occurred in another state and thus amounts to an unconstitutional ex post facto law. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

 

 

Prisoner Education Guide side
Advertise Here 4th Ad
Disciplinary Self-Help Litigation Manual - Side