×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Clarifies Interpretation of Aggravating Provisions of Section 22.01(b)(2)(A) and (B), Charging One Provision at Guilt Phase Doesn’t Confer Jurisdiction to Argue Other Provision at Sentencing Phase
Loaded on July 15, 2021
by David Reutter
published in Criminal Legal News
August, 2021, page 22
Location:
Texas.
by David M. Reutter
The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas held that Texas Penal Code Section 22.01(b)(2)(A) establishes an element of an aggravated crime and not, alternatively, a punishment enhancement.
The Court’s opinion was issued in response to a petition for discretionary review filed by the State. The review ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Reevaluating Capital Punishment and Psychosis: How Sane Must We Be to Qualify for Execution?, by Michael Fortino, Ph.D
- Virginia Prosecutors to Dismiss 400 Drug Convictions Tied to Disgraced Cop, by Derek Gilna
- Drivers Beware: The Deadly Perils of Blank Check Traffic Stops, by Nisha Whitehead, John W. Whitehead
- U.S. District Court Grants Compassionate Release Based Entirely on Nearly Three-Decade-Old Sentencing Error, Reduces Life Sentence, by Dale Chappell
- Decades of Data Link Juvenile Lead Exposure and Criminal Behavior, by Casey Bastian
- New Jersey Governor Celebrates Juneteenth by Signing ‘Ban the Box’ Into Law, by Dale Chappell
- Fourth Circuit: Appeal Waiver Does Not Bar Challenge to Special Conditions Not Orally Pronounced in Open Court, by Dale Chappell
- Connecticut Supreme Court: Use of Jailhouse Informant Violated Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel, by Douglas Ankney
- Crime, the Myth, by Emile DeWeaver
- Physics Offers New Perspective on Blood Spatter Investigations, by Michael Fortino, Ph.D
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Clarifies Interpretation of Aggravating Provisions of Section 22.01(b)(2)(A) and (B), Charging One Provision at Guilt Phase Doesn’t Confer Jurisdiction to Argue Other Provision at Sentencing Phase, by David Reutter
- Ninth Circuit Affirms Denial of Qualified Immunity to Officers Who Coerced 13-Year-Old to Falsely Confess to Murder, by Douglas Ankney
- Simple Training Can Prevent Police From Mistaking Gun for Taser, by Matthew Clarke
- Seventh Circuit Holds Hobbs Act Robbery Not ‘Crime of Violence’ for Career Offender Enhancement, Likely IAC for Not Anticipating Outcome, by Dale Chappell
- SCOTUS Holds LWOP for Juveniles Does Not Require Finding of Incorrigibility, by Dale Chappell
- Maryland Court of Appeals: Erroneous Anti-CSI Jury Instruction Was Not Harmless Error, by Douglas Ankney
- Fourth Circuit Announces First Step Act Determinations Subject to Procedural and Reasonableness Requirements, by Douglas Ankney
- Michigan Supreme Court: Anonymous Tip Alleging Woman Was Driving Drunk Because She Yelled at Her Children Failed to Provide Reasonable Suspicion for Terry Stop, by Douglas Ankney
- SCOTUS Announces ACCA ‘Violent Felony’ Requires Knowing Use of Force, Not Mere Reckless Conduct, by Dale Chappell
- Eighth Circuit Suppresses Evidence, Ruling Plain View Exception Inapplicable, by David Reutter
- Is 743 Years Imprisonment Enough Time to Teach Someone A Lesson?, by Michael Fortino, Ph.D
- Ninth Circuit Clarifies Montana Supreme Court’s Sentence Review Division Is Not an ‘Appeal’ Triggering Habeas Clock, by Dale Chappell
- Kansas Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Convictions After State Fails to Preserve Issue for Appeal, by Dale Chappell
- New York City Ends Qualified Immunity for Police, by Matthew Clarke
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for Admission of Evidence of Third Party Guilt, by Douglas Ankney
- D.C. Circuit: Ambiguous Plea Agreement Requires Interpretation in Favor of Defendant, by David Reutter
- Sixth Circuit: First Step Act Amendments to § 924(c) Inapplicable to Defendant Sentenced Before Act’s Effective Date Even When Sentence Later Vacated, by Douglas Ankney
- Ninth Circuit: Oregon’s UUW Statute Improperly Assimilated Under Federal Assimilative Crimes Act, by Douglas Ankney
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Frees Bill Cosby, by Richard Resch
- "Arizona Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Possibility’ Standard in Balancing Right to Present Complete Defense Against Victim’s Refusal to Disclose Privileged Medical Records", by Douglas Ankney
- A New Age of Video Analytics, by Jayson Hawkins
- D.C. Circuit: Counsel’s Failure to Object to District Court’s Reliance Upon Wrong Sentencing Guideline Constitutes Ineffective Assistance, by Douglas Ankney
- Wisconsin Supreme Court: Department of Corrections Database on Sex Offenders Evaluated for Civil Commitment Discoverable in Civil Commitment Proceeding, by Matthew Clarke
- Illinois Supreme Court: State Failed to Prove Constructive Possession of Firearm, by Anthony Accurso
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court: Single Conviction for Non-Enumerated Crime of Violence Does Not Qualify as History of Violent Behavior Under RRRI Act, by Douglas Ankney
- Unjust Civil Asset Forfeiture in Phenix City, Alabama, by Edward Lyon
- Florida Police Accused of Misconduct Given Second Chances, by David Reutter
- The Vallejo Cop Controversy: Whistleblowers Expose a Secret Club of Killers, by Jayson Hawkins
- Fusion Technology Enables Vast Police Surveillance, by Jayson Hawkins
- Building Data on Police Conduct, by Jayson Hawkins
- Domestic Terrorism Laws and Civil Liberties, by Jayson Hawkins
- Report: Encryption No Barrier to Feds, by Jayson Hawkins
- News in Brief
More from David Reutter:
- Philadelphia Agrees to $9.1 Million Settlement for Wrongful Murder Conviction, Feb. 15, 2025
- ‘Fictional Pleas’ and ‘Hidden Departures’: Failure to Collect Data on Binding Federal Plea Bargains Hinders Researchers, Feb. 15, 2025
- First Circuit: Two-Level Enhancement Under § 3B1.1(c) for Leadership or Managerial Role Vacated Because Government Failed to Prove Defendant’s Order Was Actually ‘Obeyed’ by Fellow Criminal Participant, Feb. 15, 2025
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Witness Wearing Surgical Mask During Pandemic Is Denial of Sixth Amendment Right to Face-to-Face Confrontation and No General Exception to This Right for Pandemic or ‘Other Global Events’ Such as Wars and Natural, Feb. 15, 2025
- The Murky Waters of Parole, Feb. 1, 2025
- California Prisoner Awarded Over $1.26 Million in Suit Challenging Withheld Legal Mail Which Resulted in Habeas Loss, Jan. 15, 2025
- Muslim New York Prisoner’s Free Exercise of Religion Claim Reinstated, Jan. 15, 2025
- Fourth Circuit: Baltimore County Prisoners May Qualify as Employees under FLSA, Jan. 15, 2025
- In Failure-to-Treat Claims, Wellpath Denied Dismissal in Virginia, Settles in Pennsylvania, Dec. 15, 2024
- Trends Show Mortality Risks Increase with Higher Jail Turnover Rates, Dec. 15, 2024