Skip navigation
CLN bookstore

Miniken v. Walter, Ruling on fees and damages, Bulk Mail Ban on PLN Unconstitutional, 1997

Download original document:
Brief thumbnail
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
)

RECEIVED
OCT I 7
BRI ~KLI ~

"

I;~'
t'ILtU IN I H~

&. GENDLER, J !JI

U.S.OISTR ICTCC(J RT

UNI TED STATE S DISTR ICT COORTEastern Distrie: of Wa~i1 in!;!cn

,

EASTE R.."I DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

OCT 1 S jg97

JAMES R. LARSEN, CL~ RK
_
__ _ _
OEPUT'

•
5

DONALD W. MINI KIN ,

e

Pla intiff ,

r

NO .

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF

v• .

•
s

CS-'36-4 07-JLQ

JUDGMENT, STAYI NG REQUEST FOR
PUNITIVE DAMAGES._ AND AWARD ING
REASO NABLE ATTORNEY FEE S

KAY WALTER and DAVID BUSS ,

Defenda nts .
On August 25,

1 9 97, the cour t

entered a Memor a ndum Opinion

tt

and Order Granti ng Plainci f:'s Mo t ion f or Summary

"

and

De ny i ng Defendants' Moeien for Summary J ud gme nt in t he aboveentit led matter (Ct . Rec. 55 ).
injunct ion a g a ins t

i

Jud~ent

The c ou r t entered a

pe ~an ent

the Defendants "from prohibiti ng d e l i v e ry of

s
an i nmate's paid-for subscription t o . a profit or nonprof it
pub l ication b a s e d on ly on the fact tha t

"
"
"

inma te by ' s tandard ma il' ".

i t i s ma iled t o the

The court directe d the parties to

".
directed Plain t iff to f i l e a Statement setting fort h the hour s
expended and the reas o nab le fee per hour to li t i g a t e this case .

"

The parties have not com plied wi t h t hat dire c tive .

~i ch a el

aa
Gendler represe nts P laint iff .

w.

Ass i stant At t o rne y Ge neral Colleen

B . Evans repres ents Defendants.

"

as
ORDER DIRECTI~G ENTRY OF JUDGME.'IT, STAY ING REQUES T FOR
PUNITIVE DAMAGES , AND AWARDING REASONABLE ATTO~~ Y F E ES

1

DAMAGES

:

Plaintiff seeks $30.00 in compensa tory damages re pre s e nting

3

the cos t of a 2 year subsc ription to Pr i son Lega l New s , whi c h h e

4

was de ni e d , nominal d amages in t he a mount o f $1 . 0 0 f or

5

v iolatio n of his r i g ht to pr o c edu r a l due proc e s s because he

e

receive d n o ma il rejec t i o n no ti c e , a nd puni t ive da mages in the

7

amo un t of $250 .00 for eac h issue of

e

thro~

s

Plainti f f does not state how many issue s of Prison Lega l Ne ws

10

were t hr-cwn away by prison officials .

11

t o the $3 1. 00 but do o b j e c t t o t he reque s t f o r punitive c a mages .

12

There=are , the

13

the su::! o f $ 3 1 . 00 i:1. compensatory and nominal d a mage s .

14

the cou =t further finds t hat Plainti f f ' s r e que s t

15

damag e s s ho u l d be s t ayed p end i ng the a p pe al p e nd i ng wit h the

1e

Nint h Circuit Court o f Appe a l s .

Legal Ne·....:::

t ~a':;.

·.:a s

a way by prison o fficials wit ho ut notice to t he Plaintif f.

cou~

42 U.S.C .

§

Defe:1.dants do not object

fi nds t ha t Plain tif f is entit led t o r ec ove r

REAS ONABt . :=:

17

"

Pr i. s-~n

t~e

AT'I' O~

acvevee ,

f o r punitive

FEES

-

1 988 pro vides in pe r t i nent p art t ha t t he c o urt ,

19

i n its d iscret i on , may allow the p revailing party in a

20

a c z Lcn a reasonable ar t o rneyve fee.

21

that Pl a ir:.tiff 's attor:ley r eas ona b l y spe nt 56 hours ee t hi s case .

22

However , Defendants do dispute that $187.5 0 per hou r is a

23

reasonable hour ly rate pu r s u a nt to the Prison Litiga tion Re form

24

Act , 42 U.S.C . !i 1997e (d J 01.

"

§

1983

Defendants do no t d i spu t e

42 U.S.C. 5 1 997e(d J O J au tho r izes a f e e awa r d to be made at
ORDER DI RECTI NG ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. ST AYING REQUEST FOR
PUNIT I VE DAMAGES, AND AWARD ING REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES

,

..

1

ten days a ft e r t h e entry of judgment, serve on t he a t t o r n e y f or

2

the adverse party a nd file with t he Clerk of the Court a verified

3

bill of costs on a form whi c h will be f urnis hed by t he Cl e r k of

4

the Cour t upon request .

5

Defendants s t a t e that they have no objectio n to the

6

$1 ,332.70 origi na l ly claimed by the Plaintiff as

7

costs.

a

$194.60.

9

Court on the pr?per form in order to recover cos ts.

10

may file any objections wi t h the Clerk in accordance with th e

11

Local Ru le .

t

2

ou t-of~pccket

Plaintiff has n o w filed a reque st for a n additiona l
Plaintiff must submit the se cost s to the Cler k o f the

Defendan ts

I':' I S HERE BY ORDERED :

1.

The Clerk is d irected to enter a Judgment i n favor of

14

the Plaintiff against the Defe ndants a warding Plaintiff

15

damages and $4,339 .00 in re asonable attorney and paralegal fee s

16

for a total judgment of $4,370.00.
2.

Pl a i n t i f f ' s

rd q~ e s t

$3~ .aO

in

fo r pu nitive damage$ i s STAYED

18

pending th e a ppe a l filed by t he Defendants wi t h the Nin th Circuit

19

Court of Appeals.
I T IS SO ORD ERED .

The Cler k is d irected to e nter this Order

a nd fo rward copi e s to ~nsel.
DATE D

"as

this

""'--day of October, ~997.

/

JUSTIN

. QUA CKENEl.i", H

'SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

'-.-/
ORDER DIRECTI NG ENTRY OF JUDG ME~, STAYING REQUEST FOR
PUNI TIVE Dk~AGES . AND AWARDING REASONABLE ATT O~VE Y FEES

.•.

~~der

1

a n hourly r aCe whi ch i s 250 percent of t he fees authori zed

2

1 6 U.S .C .

3

t ha t cou rt s hav e a ut horized payme nt t o cour t -appoint ed counse l in

4

c a p i t al criminal cases at a maximum rate of $125 :00 per hour .

S

However, t his is not a cap ital crimi nal c as e.

6

all owe d in t h e Eastern Dis t r ic t

7

court-app oi nte¢. attc rn e y s i s $ .. 5.00 f o r out-o E- c ou rt. t i me , aec

a

$65 .00 for in- cou r t

9

§

J 0 06A f or court-appointed counsel .

of

Plaintiff argues

Rather , the r ate

Washington under

§

J 006A for

t ime .

He re , c ounse l fo r the Plaintif f expended 56 hours of out-of-

10

co u r t

t i me .

11

at to rney fe e of $ 3 , 780 .0 0

12

of

13

1 9 97 e ( d l (3).

$ 4 s ~00

Therefore,

Pl aint i ff is enti tled t o a r e a s on a ble
( 5 6 hours t i me s $6 7 .50 an hour o r

an h o ur ), u n der 1 8

a .s. c.

§

15 0 "

30 0 6A a n d 42 U.S .C. §

PARAL EGAL FEES

14

is

Again, Defendants do no t

objec~

to the 6 .6 hours request ed

16

for p aral e gal fee s , but d o obj e c t t o th e $6 5.00 h o u r ly rate of

17

ca l cula t ion .

16

t he ma xi mu m amoun t a ll owab le for paralegal fees .

19

t ha t

20

ent i t led t o r ecover S 5 59. 0 0 i n para legal fee s

21

$ 65 . 0 0 a n hou r ) .

24

Prison Litigation,

Re: ~rm

$ 6 5 .0 0 a n hour i s n et; u n r eas o n a b le .

az
23

T~e

ACt dces not

spea~

Th e cour t

Theref o re,

to

f inds

P l a i n ti f f is

(8 . 6 h our s tim e s

COSTS
Ea stern Distri ct of Wa s h i n g t o n Loc a l Rule 54 . 1 provides in
p ertinen t p a r t

tha t the p arty in whos e f a vor a jud gme :l t

is

as
re n d e r e d, and wh o i s entitled t o claim his costs, sha ll within
ORDER DI RECT I NG ENTRY OF JUDGMENT , STAY ING REQUEST FOR
PUN I TI VE DA.'tAGES, AND AWARDI NG REASONAB LE ATTORNEY FEES



 

CLN Subscribe Now Ad 450x600

 

Advertise Here 4th Ad

 

The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel Side

 

PLN Subscribe Now Ad 450x450
Prisoner Education Guide Footer